Claim 2. Let 0<ε. By claim 8 the element η=ε⋅2−1 satisfies 0<η and η+η=ε. Continuity of f and of g at x relative to A gives δ1 and δ2, both positive, such that d(x,z)<δ1 implies ∣f(z)−f(x)∣<η and d(x,z)<δ2 implies ∣g(z)−g(x)∣<η, for z∈A. By claim 9 there is δ with δ≤δ1, δ≤δ2 and δ equal to δ1 or to δ2; in either case 0<δ.
By claim 3 the right-hand side is smaller than η+η=ε, so claim 2 gives ∣(f+g)(z)−(f+g)(x)∣<ε.
Claim 3. Let 0<ε, and set M=∣g(x)∣+1 and N=∣f(x)∣+1. By claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field we have 0≤∣g(x)∣, so 0+1≤∣g(x)∣+1 by compatibility of the order with addition in an ordered field; since 0<1 by claim 6 and 0+1=1, claim 2 gives 0<M, and likewise 0<N. By claim 7 the inverses M−1 and N−1 exist and are positive. By claim 8 the element η=ε⋅2−1 is positive with η+η=ε, and by claim 5 the elements η⋅M−1 and η⋅N−1 are positive.
Continuity of f and of g at x relative to A gives positive δ0,δ1,δ2 such that, for z∈A: d(x,z)<δ0 implies ∣g(z)−g(x)∣<1; d(x,z)<δ1 implies ∣f(z)−f(x)∣<η⋅M−1; and d(x,z)<δ2 implies ∣g(z)−g(x)∣<η⋅N−1. Applying claim 9 twice produces δ with δ≤δ0, δ≤δ1, δ≤δ2 and δ equal to one of them, so 0<δ.
First, ∣g(z)∣=∣(g(z)−g(x))+g(x)∣≤v+∣g(x)∣ by claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, and v<1 gives v+∣g(x)∣<1+∣g(x)∣=M by claim 1; so ∣g(z)∣<M by claim 2, and in particular ∣g(z)∣≤M. Also ∣f(x)∣+0≤∣f(x)∣+1=N by compatibility of the order with addition applied to 0≤1, that is ∣f(x)∣≤N.
By distributivity, commutativity and associativity in the field,
Since 0≤u and ∣g(z)∣≤M, claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives u∣g(z)∣≤uM. Since u<η⋅M−1 and 0<M, claim 10 gives Mu<M⋅(η⋅M−1), and the right-hand side equals η by associativity and commutativity of multiplication together with the defining property of the multiplicative inverse and of the multiplicative identity. As uM=Mu, claim 2 yields u∣g(z)∣<η. The same argument with v, ∣f(x)∣ and N in place of u, ∣g(z)∣ and M yields ∣f(x)∣v<η.
By claim 3, u∣g(z)∣+∣f(x)∣v<η+η=ε, and claim 2 gives ∣f(z)g(z)−f(x)g(x)∣<ε.
Claim 4. By claim 1 the constant map with value c is continuous at x relative to A, and cf is its pointwise product with f. Applying claim 3 with that constant map in place of f and with f in place of g gives the assertion.
Claim 5. If f and g are continuous on A, they are continuous at every point of A relative to A, so claims 2, 3 and 4 apply at every such point; hence f+g, fg and cf are continuous at every point of A relative to A, that is, continuous on A.