TheoremBase

Proof

Throughout, c=(σ,γ)c=(\sigma,\gamma) denotes a label, 1E\mathbf{1}_{E} the indicator of a set EE, and πσ\pi_\sigma the coordinate map x↦xσx\mapsto x_\sigma on U×VU\times V. Two elementary facts are used repeatedly. (F1) The simplex is convex: if x,y∈Δlx,y\in\Delta^l and τ∈[0,1]\tau\in[0,1] then x+τ(y−x)x+\tau(y-x) has nonnegative coordinates ((1−τ)xγ+τyγ≥0(1-\tau)x^\gamma+\tau y^\gamma\ge0) summing to (1−τ)+τ=1(1-\tau)+\tau=1, so it lies in Δl\Delta^l; hence for x,y∈Δlx,y\in\Delta^l and α∈A\alpha\in\mathcal{A} the segment between (x,α)(x,\alpha) and (y,α)(y,\alpha) lies in Δl×A⊆U×V\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A}\subseteq U\times V, and the Euclidean distance between these two points is ∣y−x∣|y-x|. (F2) Piecewise constant maps are measurable: by condition 1 of Open-Loop Aggregate Solution Driven by Aggregate Transition Clocks each component of Σ\Sigma, of Σ+\Sigma^{+} and hence of YY is a finite sum of constants times indicators of subintervals of [0,T][0,T], which is measurable by claims 1 and 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions and bounded because Σs,Σs+∈GN⊆Δl\Sigma_s,\Sigma^{+}_s\in\mathbb{G}_N\subseteq\Delta^l have coordinates in [0,1][0,1]; and if FF is a function on U×VU\times V that is sequentially continuous on Δl×A\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A}, then s↦F(Σs,as)s\mapsto F(\Sigma_s,a_s) and s↦F(Σs+,as)s\mapsto F(\Sigma^{+}_s,a_s) are measurable by Sequentially Continuous Functions of Measurable Euclidean Maps are Measurable, the components of s↦(Σs,as)s\mapsto(\Sigma_s,a_s) and of s↦(Σs+,as)s\mapsto(\Sigma^{+}_s,a_s) being measurable; they are bounded whenever FF is bounded on Δl×A\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A}.

Step 1 (Claim 1). The perturbed clock family. Put ν(u)=#{k:uk≤u}\nu(u)=\#\{k:u_k\le u\}, so p+,c0=pc0+νp^{+,c_0}=p^{c_0}+\nu. The map ν\nu takes values in {0,…,m}\{0,\dots,\mathsf{m}\}, vanishes at 00 (as every uk>0u_k>0), is nondecreasing, and is right-continuous: for u≥0u\ge0 let ϵ>0\epsilon>0 be smaller than every positive difference uk−uu_k-u; then ν(s)=ν(u)\nu(s)=\nu(u) for s∈[u,u+ϵ)s\in[u,u+\epsilon). Its left limit is ν(u−)=#{k:uk<u}\nu(u-)=\#\{k:u_k<u\}, so ν(u)−ν(u−)=#{k:uk=u}≤1\nu(u)-\nu(u-)=\#\{k:u_k=u\}\le1, the uku_k being distinct. The sum of two nondecreasing right-continuous functions is nondecreasing and right-continuous (the greatest lower bound over s>us>u of a sum of two nondecreasing functions is the sum of the greatest lower bounds), its left limits add, and p+,c0(u)−p+,c0(u−)=(pc0(u)−pc0(u−))+(ν(u)−ν(u−))p^{+,c_0}(u)-p^{+,c_0}(u-)=(p^{c_0}(u)-p^{c_0}(u-))+(\nu(u)-\nu(u-)): if u=uku=u_k for some kk, then uu is not a jump time of pc0p^{c_0}, so the first difference is 00 and the sum is 11; otherwise the second difference is 00 and the sum is at most 11. Also p+,c0p^{+,c_0} takes values in N0\mathbb{N}_0 as a sum of two such functions. Thus p+,c0p^{+,c_0} satisfies all four conditions of Counting Path and Its Jump Times, and since p+,c=pcp^{+,c}=p^{c} for c≠c0c\neq c_0, p+p^{+} is a clock family. We also record that ∣vc∣=2|v_c|=\sqrt{2} for every label: vc=δγ−δσv_c=\delta_\gamma-\delta_\sigma with γ≠σ\gamma\neq\sigma has two coordinates equal to ±1\pm1 and the others 00, so ∣vc∣2=2|v_c|^{2}=2 by The Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n; and that for vectors y1,…,yn∈Rly_1,\dots,y_n\in\mathbb{R}^l and reals λ1,…,λn\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_n one has ∣∑iλiyi∣≤∑i∣λi∣∣yi∣|\sum_i\lambda_iy_i|\le\sum_i|\lambda_i||y_i|, by induction on nn from claims 6 (triangle inequality) and 5 (absolute homogeneity) of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square. Also p+,c0(0)=pc0(0)+ν(0)=0p^{+,c_0}(0)=p^{c_0}(0)+\nu(0)=0, and a maximum of finitely many continuous real functions is continuous, being obtained by iterating max⁡(f,g)=12(f+g+∣f−g∣)\max(f,g)=\tfrac12(f+g+|f-g|).

Label rates. By claim 2 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set the coordinate map πσ\pi_\sigma is smooth on the open set U×VU\times V, in particular of class C2C^2 there, and βˉ(σ,γ,⋅,⋅)\bar{\beta}(\sigma,\gamma,\cdot,\cdot) is of class C2C^2 there by condition 2 of Twice Continuously Differentiable Extension of a Transition-Rate Family; so ψc=πσβˉ(σ,γ,⋅,⋅)\psi_c=\pi_\sigma\bar{\beta}(\sigma,\gamma,\cdot,\cdot) is of class C2C^2 on U×VU\times V by claim 3 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set. Since ∂iπσ=1{i=σ}\partial_i\pi_\sigma=\mathbf{1}\{i=\sigma\} (the difference quotient of πσ\pi_\sigma in the iith variable is constantly 1{i=σ}\mathbf{1}\{i=\sigma\}, with 1{i=σ}=1\mathbf{1}\{i=\sigma\}=1 if i=σi=\sigma and 00 otherwise), claim 1 of the same lemma gives, at every point x=(Σ,α)x=(\Sigma,\alpha) of U×VU\times V,

∂iψc(x)=1{i=σ} βˉ(σ,γ,x)+Σσ ∂iβˉ(σ,γ,x),∂j∂iψc(x)=1{i=σ} ∂jβˉ(σ,γ,x)+1{j=σ} ∂iβˉ(σ,γ,x)+Σσ ∂j∂iβˉ(σ,γ,x),\partial_i\psi_c(x)=\mathbf{1}\{i=\sigma\}\,\bar{\beta}(\sigma,\gamma,x)+\Sigma^{\sigma}\,\partial_i\bar{\beta}(\sigma,\gamma,x),\qquad \partial_j\partial_i\psi_c(x)=\mathbf{1}\{i=\sigma\}\,\partial_j\bar{\beta}(\sigma,\gamma,x)+\mathbf{1}\{j=\sigma\}\,\partial_i\bar{\beta}(\sigma,\gamma,x)+\Sigma^{\sigma}\,\partial_j\partial_i\bar{\beta}(\sigma,\gamma,x),

the second by applying claim 1 to the sum 1{i=σ}βˉ+πσ ∂iβˉ\mathbf{1}\{i=\sigma\}\bar{\beta}+\pi_\sigma\,\partial_i\bar{\beta} (all partial derivatives involved existing, βˉ\bar{\beta} being C2C^2). At points of Δl×A\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A} one has 0≤Σσ≤10\le\Sigma^{\sigma}\le1 and 0≤βˉ(σ,γ,x)=β(σ,γ,Σ,α)≤B0\le\bar{\beta}(\sigma,\gamma,x)=\beta(\sigma,\gamma,\Sigma,\alpha)\le B (conditions 1 of the extension and of Transition-Rate Family), and all partial derivatives of βˉ\bar{\beta} of order one and two are bounded by KK (condition 3 of the extension), so ∣∂iψc∣≤B+K|\partial_i\psi_c|\le B+K and ∣∂j∂iψc∣≤K+K+K=3K|\partial_j\partial_i\psi_c|\le K+K+K=3K there. The identity ψc=Σσβ(σ,γ,Σ,α)\psi_c=\Sigma^\sigma\beta(\sigma,\gamma,\Sigma,\alpha) on Δl×A\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A} is condition 1 of the extension, and the formula for Ctc\mathsf{C}^{c}_t is then the definition of the consumed clock times, Σs∈GN⊆Δl\Sigma_s\in\mathbb{G}_N\subseteq\Delta^l and as∈Aa_s\in\mathcal{A}.

Measurability. The map s↦Yss\mapsto Y_s is bounded and its components are measurable, by (F2). Each ∂ηψc\partial_\eta\psi_c is continuous on U×VU\times V (a C2C^2 map has continuous first partial derivatives, by clauses 1 and 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set), hence sequentially continuous on Δl×A\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A}, so s↦∂ηψc(Σs,as)s\mapsto\partial_\eta\psi_c(\Sigma_s,a_s) is measurable by (F2) and bounded by B+KB+K; the components of s↦E(Σs,as)Yss\mapsto\mathcal{E}(\Sigma_s,a_s)Y_s are finite sums of products of such maps with the components of YY, hence bounded and measurable by claims 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions.

Exact identity. By condition 2 of Open-Loop Aggregate Solution Driven by Aggregate Transition Clocks for the two solutions, Σt+−Σt=1N∑cvc(Nt+,c−Ntc)\Sigma^{+}_t-\Sigma_t=\frac1N\sum_c v_c(\mathsf{N}^{+,c}_t-\mathsf{N}^{c}_t), with Ntc=pc(Ctc)\mathsf{N}^{c}_t=p^{c}(\mathsf{C}^{c}_t), Nt+,c=p+,c(Ct+,c)=pc(Ct+,c)\mathsf{N}^{+,c}_t=p^{+,c}(\mathsf{C}^{+,c}_t)=p^{c}(\mathsf{C}^{+,c}_t) for c≠c0c\neq c_0, and Nt+,c0=pc0(Ct+,c0)+ν(Ct+,c0)=pc0(Ct+,c0)+ιt\mathsf{N}^{+,c_0}_t=p^{c_0}(\mathsf{C}^{+,c_0}_t)+\nu(\mathsf{C}^{+,c_0}_t)=p^{c_0}(\mathsf{C}^{+,c_0}_t)+\iota_t. Multiplying by NN gives the displayed identity, and 0≤ιt≤m0\le\iota_t\le\mathsf{m} is clear.

Consumed-time difference. By the formula for the consumed clock times and linearity, Ct+,c−Ctc=∫[0,t]N(ψc(Σs+,as)−ψc(Σs,as)) ds\mathsf{C}^{+,c}_t-\mathsf{C}^{c}_t=\int_{[0,t]}N\bigl(\psi_c(\Sigma^{+}_s,a_s)-\psi_c(\Sigma_s,a_s)\bigr)\,ds. For each ss, part (i) of Multivariate Taylor Expansion with Uniform Second-Order Remainder, applied on the open set O=U×V⊆Rl+m\mathcal{O}=U\times V\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{l+m} to f=ψcf=\psi_c (of class C1C^1 there) and the points (Σs,as)(\Sigma_s,a_s), (Σs+,as)(\Sigma^{+}_s,a_s), whose segment lies in Δl×A\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A} by (F1) with M1=B+KM_1=B+K there, gives ∣ψc(Σs+,as)−ψc(Σs,as)∣≤l+m (B+K) ∣Σs+−Σs∣=Λ1∣Ys∣/N|\psi_c(\Sigma^{+}_s,a_s)-\psi_c(\Sigma_s,a_s)|\le\sqrt{l+m}\,(B+K)\,|\Sigma^{+}_s-\Sigma_s|=\Lambda_1|Y_s|/N. The bound ∣Ct+,c−Ctc∣≤Λ1∫[0,t]∣Ys∣ ds|\mathsf{C}^{+,c}_t-\mathsf{C}^{c}_t|\le\Lambda_1\int_{[0,t]}|Y_s|\,ds follows from Norm Bound for a Vector-Valued Lebesgue Integral over a Compact Interval (with n=1n=1) and monotonicity of the integral; the integrand s↦∣Ys∣s\mapsto|Y_s| is measurable by Sequentially Continuous Functions of Measurable Euclidean Maps are Measurable (the norm being continuous) and bounded.

Step 2 (Claim 2). Assume Λ1TA0<L\Lambda_1TA_0<L; since A0>0A_0>0, this forces L>0L>0. Put Wt=max⁡c∣Ct+,c−Ctc∣W_t=\max_{c}|\mathsf{C}^{+,c}_t-\mathsf{C}^{c}_t| for t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T]; by claim 2(a) of Existence, Uniqueness, Causality, and Measurability of the Open-Loop Aggregate Solution for both solutions, each t↦∣Ct+,c−Ctc∣t\mapsto|\mathsf{C}^{+,c}_t-\mathsf{C}^{c}_t| is continuous on [0,T][0,T] (the absolute value of a difference of continuous functions), hence so is WW (a maximum of finitely many continuous functions), W0=0W_0=0, and every level Ctc\mathsf{C}^{c}_t, Ct+,c\mathsf{C}^{+,c}_t lies in [0,NBT]⊆[0,R][0,NBT]\subseteq[0,R]. Let S={t∈[0,T]:Ws≤L for all s∈[0,t]}S=\{t\in[0,T]:W_s\le L\text{ for all }s\in[0,t]\} and let t∗t^{*} be its least upper bound; 0∈S0\in S, SS is an interval containing [0,t∗)[0,t^{*}), and Wt∗≤LW_{t^{*}}\le L by continuity, so t∗∈St^{*}\in S; moreover t∗>0t^{*}>0 by continuity and W0=0<LW_0=0<L.

For t∈[0,t∗]t\in[0,t^{*}] and every label cc the two levels Ctc,Ct+,c\mathsf{C}^{c}_t,\mathsf{C}^{+,c}_t bound a window in [0,R][0,R] of length Wt≤LW_t\le L, so hypothesis (D) gives ∣pc(Ct+,c)−pc(Ctc)∣≤∣Ct+,c−Ctc∣+D|p^{c}(\mathsf{C}^{+,c}_t)-p^{c}(\mathsf{C}^{c}_t)|\le|\mathsf{C}^{+,c}_t-\mathsf{C}^{c}_t|+D (if Ct+,c<Ctc\mathsf{C}^{+,c}_t<\mathsf{C}^{c}_t apply (D) to the window [Ct+,c,Ctc][\mathsf{C}^{+,c}_t,\mathsf{C}^{c}_t] and change signs). By the exact identity of claim 1, the triangle inequality for finite sums and ∣vc∣=2|v_c|=\sqrt{2} (both recorded in Step 1), ιt≤m\iota_t\le\mathsf{m}, and the consumed-time bound of claim 1,

∣Yt∣≤2 m+2∑c(Λ1∫[0,t]∣Ys∣ ds+D)=2(m+l(l−1)D)+2 l(l−1)Λ1∫[0,t]∣Ys∣ ds(t∈[0,t∗]).|Y_t|\le\sqrt{2}\,\mathsf{m}+\sqrt{2}\sum_{c}\Bigl(\Lambda_1\int_{[0,t]}|Y_s|\,ds+D\Bigr)=\sqrt{2}\bigl(\mathsf{m}+l(l-1)D\bigr)+\sqrt{2}\,l(l-1)\Lambda_1\int_{[0,t]}|Y_s|\,ds\qquad(t\in[0,t^{*}]).

The function u(t)=∣Yt∣u(t)=|Y_t| restricted to [0,t∗][0,t^{*}] is bounded and measurable with respect to the trace Borel σ\sigma-algebra of [0,t∗][0,t^{*}] (Step 1; the trace σ\sigma-algebra of [0,t∗][0,t^{*}] consists of the sets S′∩[0,t∗]S'\cap[0,t^{*}] with S′S' in the trace Borel σ\sigma-algebra of [0,T][0,T]), so Gronwall's Lemma for Bounded Measurable Functions, applied on [0,t∗][0,t^{*}] (with t∗>0t^{*}>0 in the role of TT there) with a=2(m+l(l−1)D)a=\sqrt{2}(\mathsf{m}+l(l-1)D) and the constant 2 l(l−1)Λ1≥0\sqrt{2}\,l(l-1)\Lambda_1\ge0, yields ∣Yt∣≤aexp⁡(2 l(l−1)Λ1t)≤A0|Y_t|\le a\exp(\sqrt{2}\,l(l-1)\Lambda_1t)\le A_0 for t∈[0,t∗]t\in[0,t^{*}], exp⁡\exp being nondecreasing (claim 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function). Consequently, by the consumed-time bound of claim 1 and monotonicity of the integral, Wt∗≤Λ1∫[0,t∗]∣Ys∣ ds≤Λ1t∗A0≤Λ1TA0<LW_{t^{*}}\le\Lambda_1\int_{[0,t^{*}]}|Y_s|\,ds\le\Lambda_1t^{*}A_0\le\Lambda_1TA_0<L. If t∗<Tt^{*}<T, then, since Wt∗<LW_{t^{*}}<L strictly, continuity of WW at t∗t^{*} would give ϵ>0\epsilon>0 with t∗+ϵ≤Tt^{*}+\epsilon\le T and Ws<LW_s<L for all s∈[t∗,t∗+ϵ]s\in[t^{*},t^{*}+\epsilon]; together with Ws≤LW_s\le L on [0,t∗][0,t^{*}] this yields t∗+ϵ∈St^{*}+\epsilon\in S, contradicting the definition of t∗t^{*}. Hence t∗=Tt^{*}=T, and the two bounds of claim 2 hold on all of [0,T][0,T] (the bound on WtW_t by the same computation with tt in place of t∗t^{*}).

Step 3 (Claim 3). Assume Λ1TA0<L\Lambda_1TA_0<L, so that claim 2 applies. Fix s∈[0,T]s\in[0,T] and a label cc. Part (ii) of Multivariate Taylor Expansion with Uniform Second-Order Remainder, applied on O=U×V\mathcal{O}=U\times V to f=ψcf=\psi_c (of class C2C^2), the points x=(Σs,as)x=(\Sigma_s,a_s) and y=(Σs+,as)y=(\Sigma^{+}_s,a_s), whose segment lies in Δl×A\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A} by (F1), and M2=3KM_2=3K (Step 1), gives, with h=y−x=(Σs+−Σs,0)h=y-x=(\Sigma^{+}_s-\Sigma_s,0), whose coordinates hih_i vanish for i>li>l,

∣ψc(Σs+,as)−ψc(Σs,as)−gc(Σs,as)⋅(Σs+−Σs)∣≤12(l+m) 3K ∣Σs+−Σs∣2=Λ2∣Ys∣2N2.\Bigl|\psi_c(\Sigma^{+}_s,a_s)-\psi_c(\Sigma_s,a_s)-g^{c}(\Sigma_s,a_s)\cdot(\Sigma^{+}_s-\Sigma_s)\Bigr|\le\tfrac12(l+m)\,3K\,|\Sigma^{+}_s-\Sigma_s|^{2}=\frac{\Lambda_2|Y_s|^{2}}{N^{2}} .

Define ρsc=N(ψc(Σs+,as)−ψc(Σs,as))−gc(Σs,as)⋅Ys\rho^{c}_s=N\bigl(\psi_c(\Sigma^{+}_s,a_s)-\psi_c(\Sigma_s,a_s)\bigr)-g^{c}(\Sigma_s,a_s)\cdot Y_s, a bounded measurable function of ss (Step 1 and (F2)) with ∣ρsc∣≤Λ2∣Ys∣2/N≤Λ2A02/N|\rho^{c}_s|\le\Lambda_2|Y_s|^{2}/N\le\Lambda_2A_0^{2}/N by claim 2. Integrating (linearity),

Ct+,c−Ctc=∫[0,t]gc(Σs,as)⋅Ys ds+∫[0,t]ρsc ds,∣∫[0,t]ρsc ds∣≤Λ2TA02N,\mathsf{C}^{+,c}_t-\mathsf{C}^{c}_t=\int_{[0,t]}g^{c}(\Sigma_s,a_s)\cdot Y_s\,ds+\int_{[0,t]}\rho^{c}_s\,ds,\qquad\Bigl|\int_{[0,t]}\rho^{c}_s\,ds\Bigr|\le\frac{\Lambda_2TA_0^{2}}{N},

the last bound by Norm Bound for a Vector-Valued Lebesgue Integral over a Compact Interval, monotonicity, and the value t≤Tt\le T of the restricted Lebesgue measure of [0,t][0,t]. Next put dtc=pc(Ct+,c)−pc(Ctc)−(Ct+,c−Ctc)d^{c}_t=p^{c}(\mathsf{C}^{+,c}_t)-p^{c}(\mathsf{C}^{c}_t)-(\mathsf{C}^{+,c}_t-\mathsf{C}^{c}_t); by claim 2 the two levels bound a window in [0,R][0,R] of length at most Λ1TA0<L\Lambda_1TA_0<L, so hypothesis (D) gives ∣dtc∣≤D|d^{c}_t|\le D (when Ct+,c<Ctc\mathsf{C}^{+,c}_t<\mathsf{C}^{c}_t, apply (D) to the window [Ct+,c,Ctc][\mathsf{C}^{+,c}_t,\mathsf{C}^{c}_t] and note that dtcd^{c}_t changes sign). Substituting into the exact identity of claim 1,

Yt=vc0ιt+∑cvc(∫[0,t]gc(Σs,as)⋅Ys ds+∫[0,t]ρsc ds+dtc)=vc0ιt+∫[0,t]E(Σs,as)Ys ds+dt,Y_t=v_{c_0}\iota_t+\sum_{c}v_c\Bigl(\int_{[0,t]}g^{c}(\Sigma_s,a_s)\cdot Y_s\,ds+\int_{[0,t]}\rho^{c}_s\,ds+d^{c}_t\Bigr)=v_{c_0}\iota_t+\int_{[0,t]}\mathcal{E}(\Sigma_s,a_s)Y_s\,ds+\mathsf{d}_t,

where dt=∑cvc(∫[0,t]ρsc ds+dtc)\mathsf{d}_t=\sum_c v_c\bigl(\int_{[0,t]}\rho^{c}_s\,ds+d^{c}_t\bigr) and where we used, for each coordinate γ\gamma, linearity of the integral to write ∑cvcγ∫[0,t]gc(Σs,as)⋅Ys ds=∫[0,t]∑cvcγ gc(Σs,as)⋅Ys ds=∫[0,t](E(Σs,as)Ys)γ ds\sum_c v_c^{\gamma}\int_{[0,t]}g^{c}(\Sigma_s,a_s)\cdot Y_s\,ds=\int_{[0,t]}\sum_c v_c^{\gamma}\,g^{c}(\Sigma_s,a_s)\cdot Y_s\,ds=\int_{[0,t]}\bigl(\mathcal{E}(\Sigma_s,a_s)Y_s\bigr)^{\gamma}\,ds, by the definition of E\mathcal{E}. Finally, by the triangle inequality for finite sums and ∣vc∣=2|v_c|=\sqrt{2} (Step 1), ∣dt∣≤2∑c(Λ2TA02/N+D)=2 l(l−1)(D+Λ2TA02/N)|\mathsf{d}_t|\le\sqrt{2}\sum_c\bigl(\Lambda_2TA_0^{2}/N+D\bigr)=\sqrt{2}\,l(l-1)\bigl(D+\Lambda_2TA_0^{2}/N\bigr).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…