TheoremBase

Finiteness comes from finiteness of tuple sets and of their subsets, with the constant word 1 witnessing that cyclically reduced words of each length exist. The counting bound extends a by zero to all of [2d]^k and compares with the constant M, using that the sum of ones over [2d]^k equals (2d)^k, proved by induction via the bijection [2d]^k x [2d] -> [2d]^{k+1}.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Throughout, 2d2d denotes the natural number d+dd+d, and also its image in R\mathbb{R} under the canonical map ιR\iota_{\mathbb{R}} of The Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to a Field; the power (2d)k(2d)^{k} is that of this real number. Sums over finite index sets are those of Sum over a Finite Index Set.

Clause 1 (finiteness). Let k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. By claim 1 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, [2d][2d] has 2d2d elements, so it is finite by Finite Set; it is nonempty because 1∈[2d]1\in[2d], as 1≤2d1\le 2d by claim 4 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers. Hence, by claim 3 of Finiteness of Cartesian Products, Tuple Sets, and Permutation Sets (with X=[2d]X=[2d] and n=kn=k), the set [2d]k[2d]^{k} is nonempty and finite. By claim 3 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, every subset of [2d]k[2d]^{k}, in particular every nonempty one, is finite.

The set Wd,k∘W^{\circ}_{d,k} is a subset of [2d]k[2d]^{k}, since by Reduced and Cyclically Reduced Words in Unitary Letters §cyclically-reduced its elements are words of length kk, which are the elements of [2d]k[2d]^{k} by Words over a Finite Alphabet: the Empty Word, Concatenation and Reversal §words; so it is finite once it is nonempty. Let oo be the map [k]→[2d][k]\to[2d] with constant value 11, a word of length kk. Since 1≤d1\le d (claim 4 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers), Words in Unitary Letters: Generators, Signs, Inverse Letters, Lengths and Adjoint Words §letters gives 1−1=d+11^{-1}=d+1, and d+1≠1d+1\ne1 by claim 7 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers. Therefore oi+1=1≠1−1=(oi)−1o_{i+1}=1\ne1^{-1}=(o_{i})^{-1} for every i∈[k]i\in[k] with i<ki<k, so oo is reduced by Reduced and Cyclically Reduced Words in Unitary Letters §reduced; and if 1<k1<k then ok=1≠1−1=(o1)−1o_{k}=1\ne1^{-1}=(o_{1})^{-1}, so oo is cyclically reduced by Reduced and Cyclically Reduced Words in Unitary Letters §cyclically-reduced. Thus o∈Wd,k∘o\in W^{\circ}_{d,k}, and Wd,k∘W^{\circ}_{d,k} is nonempty and finite.

Step A (sums of ones over initial segments). For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, let un:[n]→Ru^{n}:[n]\to\mathbb{R} be the map with constant value 11. By claim 1 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set and The Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to a Field,

∑x∈[n]1=∑k=1nukn=ιR(n).(A)\sum_{x\in[n]}1=\sum_{k=1}^{n}u^{n}_{k}=\iota_{\mathbb{R}}(n).\tag{A}

Step B (the sum of ones over [2d]k[2d]^{k}). For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} put Nk=∑t∈[2d]k1N_{k}=\sum_{t\in[2d]^{k}}1, defined because [2d]k[2d]^{k} is nonempty and finite by clause 1. We prove Nk=(2d)kN_{k}=(2d)^{k} for all k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} by the principle of induction Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers, applied to the set of k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} for which it holds.

Base k=1k=1. The initial segment [1][1] is {1}\{1\}: if m∈[1]m\in[1] then m≤1m\le1, and 1≤m1\le m by claim 4 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, so m=1m=1 by claim 2 of that lemma. Hence the map θ:[2d]→[2d]1\theta:[2d]\to[2d]^{1} sending xx to the 11-tuple with component xx is a bijection: it is injective because the component at 11 of θ(x)\theta(x) is xx, and surjective because every t∈[2d]1t\in[2d]^{1}, being a map on {1}\{1\}, equals θ(t1)\theta(t_{1}). By claim 2 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set (reindexing along θ\theta, with the constant map 11 on [2d]1[2d]^{1}) and (A),

N1=∑x∈[2d]1=ιR(2d)=(2d)1,N_{1}=\sum_{x\in[2d]}1=\iota_{\mathbb{R}}(2d)=(2d)^{1},

the last equality by claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field.

Step. Suppose Nk=(2d)kN_{k}=(2d)^{k} for some k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, and write SS for the successor map. By claim 2 of Finiteness of Cartesian Products, Tuple Sets, and Permutation Sets (with Y=[2d]Y=[2d] and n=kn=k) there is a bijection q:[2d]k×[2d]→[2d]S(k)q:[2d]^{k}\times[2d]\to[2d]^{S(k)}. The Cartesian product [2d]k×[2d][2d]^{k}\times[2d] is finite by claim 1 of Finiteness of Cartesian Products, Tuple Sets, and Permutation Sets, and nonempty since it contains (t0,x0)(t_{0},x_{0}) for any t0∈[2d]kt_{0}\in[2d]^{k} and x0∈[2d]x_{0}\in[2d], both sets being nonempty by clause 1. By claim 2 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set (reindexing along qq), then by The Product of Two Sums over Finite Index Sets is a Sum over the Cartesian Product (with the constant maps 11 on [2d]k[2d]^{k} and on [2d][2d], using 1⋅1=11\cdot1=1), and finally by (A),

NS(k)=∑p∈[2d]k×[2d]1=(∑t∈[2d]k1)(∑x∈[2d]1)=Nk⋅ιR(2d)=(2d)k (2d)=(2d)S(k),N_{S(k)}=\sum_{p\in[2d]^{k}\times[2d]}1=\Bigl(\sum_{t\in[2d]^{k}}1\Bigr)\Bigl(\sum_{x\in[2d]}1\Bigr)=N_{k}\cdot\iota_{\mathbb{R}}(2d)=(2d)^{k}\,(2d)=(2d)^{S(k)},

the last equality by claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field. This completes the induction.

Clause 2 (counting bound). Let kk, BB, MM and aa be as in clause 2, and put G=[2d]kG=[2d]^{k}. Since BB is nonempty, pick w0∈Bw_{0}\in B; then 0≤a(w0)≤M0\le a(w_{0})\le M, so 0≤M0\le M. Define a′:G→Ra':G\to\mathbb{R} by a′(w)=a(w)a'(w)=a(w) for w∈Bw\in B and a′(w)=0a'(w)=0 for w∈G∖Bw\in G\setminus B. Then 0≤a′(w)≤M0\le a'(w)\le M for every w∈Gw\in G (for w∉Bw\notin B because 0≤M0\le M), and the restriction of a′a' to BB is aa. The sets GG and BB are nonempty and finite by clause 1. By Real Sums over a Finite Index Set: Comparison, Nonnegativity, Monotonicity, Term Bounds, Absolute Values, Counting and Limits §monotone (with h=a′h=a' and E=BE=B), then by Real Sums over a Finite Index Set: Comparison, Nonnegativity, Monotonicity, Term Bounds, Absolute Values, Counting and Limits §comparison (with h=a′h=a' and h′h' the constant map MM), then by claim 4 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set (homogeneity, with M=M⋅1M=M\cdot1), and finally by Step B,

∑w∈Ba(w)=∑w∈Ba′(w)≤∑w∈Ga′(w)≤∑w∈GM=M∑w∈G1=M Nk=M (2d)k.\sum_{w\in B}a(w)=\sum_{w\in B}a'(w)\le\sum_{w\in G}a'(w)\le\sum_{w\in G}M=M\sum_{w\in G}1=M\,N_{k}=M\,(2d)^{k}.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…