Finiteness comes from finiteness of tuple sets and of their subsets, with the constant word 1 witnessing that cyclically reduced words of each length exist. The counting bound extends a by zero to all of [2d]^k and compares with the constant M, using that the sum of ones over [2d]^k equals (2d)^k, proved by induction via the bijection [2d]^k x [2d] -> [2d]^{k+1}.
Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.
Throughout, denotes the natural number , and also its image in under the canonical map of The Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to a Field; the power is that of this real number. Sums over finite index sets are those of Sum over a Finite Index Set.
Clause 1 (finiteness). Let . By claim 1 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, has elements, so it is finite by Finite Set; it is nonempty because , as by claim 4 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers. Hence, by claim 3 of Finiteness of Cartesian Products, Tuple Sets, and Permutation Sets (with and ), the set is nonempty and finite. By claim 3 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, every subset of , in particular every nonempty one, is finite.
The set is a subset of , since by Reduced and Cyclically Reduced Words in Unitary Letters §cyclically-reduced its elements are words of length , which are the elements of by Words over a Finite Alphabet: the Empty Word, Concatenation and Reversal §words; so it is finite once it is nonempty. Let be the map with constant value , a word of length . Since (claim 4 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers), Words in Unitary Letters: Generators, Signs, Inverse Letters, Lengths and Adjoint Words §letters gives , and by claim 7 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers. Therefore for every with , so is reduced by Reduced and Cyclically Reduced Words in Unitary Letters §reduced; and if then , so is cyclically reduced by Reduced and Cyclically Reduced Words in Unitary Letters §cyclically-reduced. Thus , and is nonempty and finite.
Step A (sums of ones over initial segments). For , let be the map with constant value . By claim 1 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set and The Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to a Field,
Step B (the sum of ones over ). For put , defined because is nonempty and finite by clause 1. We prove for all by the principle of induction Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers, applied to the set of for which it holds.
Base . The initial segment is : if then , and by claim 4 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, so by claim 2 of that lemma. Hence the map sending to the -tuple with component is a bijection: it is injective because the component at of is , and surjective because every , being a map on , equals . By claim 2 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set (reindexing along , with the constant map on ) and (A),
the last equality by claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field.
Step. Suppose for some , and write for the successor map. By claim 2 of Finiteness of Cartesian Products, Tuple Sets, and Permutation Sets (with and ) there is a bijection . The Cartesian product is finite by claim 1 of Finiteness of Cartesian Products, Tuple Sets, and Permutation Sets, and nonempty since it contains for any and , both sets being nonempty by clause 1. By claim 2 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set (reindexing along ), then by The Product of Two Sums over Finite Index Sets is a Sum over the Cartesian Product (with the constant maps on and on , using ), and finally by (A),
the last equality by claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field. This completes the induction.
Clause 2 (counting bound). Let , , and be as in clause 2, and put . Since is nonempty, pick ; then , so . Define by for and for . Then for every (for because ), and the restriction of to is . The sets and are nonempty and finite by clause 1. By Real Sums over a Finite Index Set: Comparison, Nonnegativity, Monotonicity, Term Bounds, Absolute Values, Counting and Limits §monotone (with and ), then by Real Sums over a Finite Index Set: Comparison, Nonnegativity, Monotonicity, Term Bounds, Absolute Values, Counting and Limits §comparison (with and the constant map ), then by claim 4 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set (homogeneity, with ), and finally by Step B,
Loading…