Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.
Conventions. Throughout, n n n denotes a natural number, γ n \gamma_{n} γ n abbreviates the diagonal Gaussian measure γ c ( n ) \gamma_{c^{(n)}} γ c ( n ) on R n \mathbb{R}^{n} R n of Variance Sequences and Their Truncations §truncations , and ρ n \rho_{n} ρ n is the diagonal Gaussian density with variances c ( n ) c^{(n)} c ( n ) . By Diagonal Gaussian Measures on Euclidean Space §measure , γ n \gamma_{n} γ n is the measure with density ρ n \rho_{n} ρ n with respect to Lebesgue measure λ n \lambda_{n} λ n on B ( R n ) \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) B ( R n ) ; so by claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables every Borel f : R n → [ 0 , ∞ ] f:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to[0,\infty] f : R n → [ 0 , ∞ ] satisfies ∫ f d γ n = ∫ f ρ n d λ n \int f\,d\gamma_{n}=\int f\rho_{n}\,d\lambda_{n} ∫ f d γ n = ∫ f ρ n d λ n in [ 0 , ∞ ] [0,\infty] [ 0 , ∞ ] , and a Borel f : R n → R f:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} f : R n → R is γ n \gamma_{n} γ n -integrable exactly when f ρ n f\rho_{n} f ρ n is λ n \lambda_{n} λ n -integrable, with the same identity. We call this the density rule . Integrals ∫ … d z \int\dots\,dz ∫ … d z over R n \mathbb{R}^{n} R n are taken with respect to λ n \lambda_{n} λ n . For real v > 0 v>0 v > 0 , γ ( v ) \gamma_{(v)} γ ( v ) denotes the diagonal Gaussian measure on R 1 \mathbb{R}^{1} R 1 with variance vector ( v ) (v) ( v ) , which is the measure written γ v \gamma_{v} γ v in Hermite Polynomials: Low Orders, Derivatives, Recursion, Scaling, the Addition Formula, Gaussian Orthogonality and the Mehler Identity , and ρ ( v ) \rho_{(v)} ρ ( v ) is its density. For a , b ∈ R n \mathbf{a},\mathbf{b}\in\mathbb{R}^{n} a , b ∈ R n put a ⊙ b = ( a 1 b 1 , … , a n b n ) \mathbf{a}\odot\mathbf{b}=(\mathbf{a}_{1}\mathbf{b}_{1},\dots,\mathbf{a}_{n}\mathbf{b}_{n}) a ⊙ b = ( a 1 b 1 , … , a n b n ) ; if every b k \mathbf{b}_{k} b k is nonzero, b − 1 = ( b 1 − 1 , … , b n − 1 ) \mathbf{b}^{-1}=(\mathbf{b}_{1}^{-1},\dots,\mathbf{b}_{n}^{-1}) b − 1 = ( b 1 − 1 , … , b n − 1 ) ; 1 = ( 1 , … , 1 ) \mathbf{1}=(1,\dots,1) 1 = ( 1 , … , 1 ) ; and for k ∈ [ n ] k\in[n] k ∈ [ n ] , δ ( k ) ∈ R n \delta^{(k)}\in\mathbb{R}^{n} δ ( k ) ∈ R n is the point with k k k -th entry 1 1 1 and all other entries 0 0 0 . For real r ≥ 0 r\ge0 r ≥ 0 put η ( r ) = ( η 1 ( r ) , … , η n ( r ) ) \eta(r)=(\eta_{1}(r),\dots,\eta_{n}(r)) η ( r ) = ( η 1 ( r ) , … , η n ( r )) and ξ ( r ) = ( ξ 1 ( r ) , … , ξ n ( r ) ) \xi(r)=(\xi_{1}(r),\dots,\xi_{n}(r)) ξ ( r ) = ( ξ 1 ( r ) , … , ξ n ( r )) , with the numbers η k ( r ) \eta_{k}(r) η k ( r ) , ξ k ( r ) \xi_{k}(r) ξ k ( r ) of The Mehler Maps and the Mehler Semigroup with Noise Weights on Continuous Cylindrical Functions of Polynomial Growth §map ; by that clause 0 < η k ( r ) ≤ 1 0<\eta_{k}(r)\le1 0 < η k ( r ) ≤ 1 , 0 ≤ ξ k ( r ) ≤ 1 0\le\xi_{k}(r)\le1 0 ≤ ξ k ( r ) ≤ 1 and η k ( r ) 2 + ξ k ( r ) 2 = 1 \eta_{k}(r)^{2}+\xi_{k}(r)^{2}=1 η k ( r ) 2 + ξ k ( r ) 2 = 1 . We write Θ n = max { θ 1 , … , θ n } \Theta_{n}=\max\{\theta_{1},\dots,\theta_{n}\} Θ n = max { θ 1 , … , θ n } , with the rates of Gaussian Analysis Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure with Noise Weights: Standing Notation §rates .
A function φ : R n → R \varphi:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} φ : R n → R is called of polynomial growth with constants ( B φ , q φ ) (B_{\varphi},q_{\varphi}) ( B φ , q φ ) if it is continuous, B φ ≥ 0 B_{\varphi}\ge0 B φ ≥ 0 is real, q φ ∈ N ∪ { 0 } q_{\varphi}\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\} q φ ∈ N ∪ { 0 } , and ∣ φ ( y ) ∣ ≤ B φ ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ q φ ) |\varphi(y)|\le B_{\varphi}(1+\lVert y\rVert^{q_{\varphi}}) ∣ φ ( y ) ∣ ≤ B φ ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ q φ ) for every y ∈ R n y\in\mathbb{R}^{n} y ∈ R n . By Continuous Cylindrical Functions of Polynomial Growth on a Hilbert Space §class and Continuous Cylindrical Functions of Polynomial Growth on a Hilbert Space §representation , ( n , ψ , B , q ) (n,\psi,B,q) ( n , ψ , B , q ) is a representation of F F F exactly when ψ \psi ψ is of polynomial growth with constants ( B , q ) (B,q) ( B , q ) and F = ψ ∘ p n F=\psi\circ p_{n} F = ψ ∘ p n . For such φ \varphi φ and real r ≥ 0 r\ge0 r ≥ 0 we put
φ r ( u ) = ∫ R n φ ( η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z ) γ n ( d z ) ( u ∈ R n ) , \varphi_{r}(u)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\varphi\bigl(\eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot z\bigr)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\qquad(u\in\mathbb{R}^{n}), φ r ( u ) = ∫ R n φ ( η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z ) γ n ( d z ) ( u ∈ R n ) ,
which is well defined by Step 9 below; for φ = ψ \varphi=\psi φ = ψ and r = t r=t r = t this is the function ψ t \psi_{t} ψ t of claim 2.
Step 1 (Elementary inequalities). Let a , b ≥ 0 a,b\ge0 a , b ≥ 0 be real and q , q ′ , Q ∈ N ∪ { 0 } q,q',Q\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\} q , q ′ , Q ∈ N ∪ { 0 } , with a 0 = 1 a^{0}=1 a 0 = 1 . (E1) If q ≤ Q q\le Q q ≤ Q , then a q ≤ 1 + a Q a^{q}\le1+a^{Q} a q ≤ 1 + a Q : for a ≤ 1 a\le1 a ≤ 1 , a q ≤ 1 a^{q}\le1 a q ≤ 1 , and for a ≥ 1 a\ge1 a ≥ 1 , a q ≤ a Q a^{q}\le a^{Q} a q ≤ a Q . (E2) 1 + a q ≤ 2 ( 1 + a 2 ) q 1+a^{q}\le2(1+a^{2})^{q} 1 + a q ≤ 2 ( 1 + a 2 ) q , since each of 1 1 1 and a q a^{q} a q is at most ( 1 + a 2 ) q (1+a^{2})^{q} ( 1 + a 2 ) q : for a ≤ 1 a\le1 a ≤ 1 because a q ≤ 1 a^{q}\le1 a q ≤ 1 , and for a ≥ 1 a\ge1 a ≥ 1 because a q ≤ a 2 q ≤ ( 1 + a 2 ) q a^{q}\le a^{2q}\le(1+a^{2})^{q} a q ≤ a 2 q ≤ ( 1 + a 2 ) q . (E3) ( a + b ) q ≤ 2 q ( a q + b q ) (a+b)^{q}\le2^{q}(a^{q}+b^{q}) ( a + b ) q ≤ 2 q ( a q + b q ) and 1 + ( a + b ) q ≤ 2 q ( 1 + a q ) ( 1 + b q ) 1+(a+b)^{q}\le2^{q}(1+a^{q})(1+b^{q}) 1 + ( a + b ) q ≤ 2 q ( 1 + a q ) ( 1 + b q ) : for q = 0 q=0 q = 0 these read 1 ≤ 2 1\le2 1 ≤ 2 and 2 ≤ 4 2\le4 2 ≤ 4 ; for q ≥ 1 q\ge1 q ≥ 1 , with m = max { a , b } m=\max\{a,b\} m = max { a , b } , ( a + b ) q ≤ ( 2 m ) q = 2 q m q ≤ 2 q ( a q + b q ) (a+b)^{q}\le(2m)^{q}=2^{q}m^{q}\le2^{q}(a^{q}+b^{q}) ( a + b ) q ≤ ( 2 m ) q = 2 q m q ≤ 2 q ( a q + b q ) , whence 1 + ( a + b ) q ≤ 2 q ( 1 + a q + b q + a q b q ) = 2 q ( 1 + a q ) ( 1 + b q ) 1+(a+b)^{q}\le2^{q}(1+a^{q}+b^{q}+a^{q}b^{q})=2^{q}(1+a^{q})(1+b^{q}) 1 + ( a + b ) q ≤ 2 q ( 1 + a q + b q + a q b q ) = 2 q ( 1 + a q ) ( 1 + b q ) . (E4) ( 1 + a q ) ( 1 + a q ′ ) ≤ 4 ( 1 + a q + q ′ ) (1+a^{q})(1+a^{q'})\le4(1+a^{q+q'}) ( 1 + a q ) ( 1 + a q ′ ) ≤ 4 ( 1 + a q + q ′ ) , since by (E1) each of 1 1 1 , a q a^{q} a q , a q ′ a^{q'} a q ′ , a q + q ′ a^{q+q'} a q + q ′ is at most 1 + a q + q ′ 1+a^{q+q'} 1 + a q + q ′ ; also 1 + a q ≤ 2 ( 1 + a Q ) 1+a^{q}\le2(1+a^{Q}) 1 + a q ≤ 2 ( 1 + a Q ) for q ≤ Q q\le Q q ≤ Q , by (E1). (E5) If p ≥ 1 p\ge1 p ≥ 1 is real, m ∈ N m\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N and p ≤ m p\le m p ≤ m , then a p ≤ 1 + a m a^{p}\le1+a^{m} a p ≤ 1 + a m , for the power a p a^{p} a p of Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §powers . Indeed 1 p = 1 1^{p}=1 1 p = 1 , because 1 p = ( 1 ⋅ 1 ) p = 1 p 1 p 1^{p}=(1\cdot1)^{p}=1^{p}1^{p} 1 p = ( 1 ⋅ 1 ) p = 1 p 1 p and 1 p > 0 1^{p}>0 1 p > 0 by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §product and Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §values ; so for a ≤ 1 a\le1 a ≤ 1 , a p ≤ 1 a^{p}\le1 a p ≤ 1 by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone , while for a ≥ 1 a\ge1 a ≥ 1 and p < m p<m p < m , a m = a p a m − p ≥ a p 1 m − p = a p a^{m}=a^{p}a^{m-p}\ge a^{p}1^{m-p}=a^{p} a m = a p a m − p ≥ a p 1 m − p = a p by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §exponents , Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone and Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §agreement , the case p = m p=m p = m being Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §agreement . Finally, for a , y ∈ R n \mathbf{a},y\in\mathbb{R}^{n} a , y ∈ R n with ∣ a k ∣ ≤ 1 |\mathbf{a}_{k}|\le1 ∣ a k ∣ ≤ 1 for every k k k , ∥ a ⊙ y ∥ ≤ ∥ y ∥ \lVert\mathbf{a}\odot y\rVert\le\lVert y\rVert ∥ a ⊙ y ∥ ≤ ∥ y ∥ by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n §square and claim 5 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities ; and ∣ y k ∣ ≤ ∥ y ∥ |y_{k}|\le\lVert y\rVert ∣ y k ∣ ≤ ∥ y ∥ by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n §coordinate .
Step 2 (Moments and the transfer rule). For N ∈ N ∪ { 0 } N\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\} N ∈ N ∪ { 0 } the function y ↦ ( 1 + ∣ y ∣ 2 ) N y\mapsto(1+|y|^{2})^{N} y ↦ ( 1 + ∣ y ∣ 2 ) N on X X X is continuous, hence Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space , and
K N = ∫ X ( 1 + ∣ y ∣ 2 ) N γ c ( d y ) < ∞ . K_{N}=\int_{X}(1+|y|^{2})^{N}\,\gamma_{c}(dy)<\infty . K N = ∫ X ( 1 + ∣ y ∣ 2 ) N γ c ( d y ) < ∞.
Indeed, put c ˉ = ∑ k = 1 ∞ c k > 0 \bar{c}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}>0 c ˉ = ∑ k = 1 ∞ c k > 0 , so that c k ≤ c ˉ c_{k}\le\bar{c} c k ≤ c ˉ for every k k k by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §dominates , and α = 1 / ( 4 c ˉ ) \alpha=1/(4\bar{c}) α = 1/ ( 4 c ˉ ) . The function u ↦ ( 1 + u / α ) N u\mapsto(1+u/\alpha)^{N} u ↦ ( 1 + u / α ) N is a polynomial function , so claim 1 of The Exponential Function Dominates Every Polynomial Function (with ε = 1 \varepsilon=1 ε = 1 , multiplying by exp ( u ) > 0 \exp(u)>0 exp ( u ) > 0 and using claims 1 and 2 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function ) gives a real u 0 ≥ 1 u_{0}\ge1 u 0 ≥ 1 with ( 1 + u / α ) N < exp ( u ) (1+u/\alpha)^{N}<\exp(u) ( 1 + u / α ) N < exp ( u ) for u ≥ u 0 u\ge u_{0} u ≥ u 0 , while ( 1 + u / α ) N ≤ ( 1 + u 0 / α ) N (1+u/\alpha)^{N}\le(1+u_{0}/\alpha)^{N} ( 1 + u / α ) N ≤ ( 1 + u 0 / α ) N for 0 ≤ u ≤ u 0 0\le u\le u_{0} 0 ≤ u ≤ u 0 ; with u = α ∣ y ∣ 2 u=\alpha|y|^{2} u = α ∣ y ∣ 2 and C N = ( 1 + u 0 / α ) N C_{N}=(1+u_{0}/\alpha)^{N} C N = ( 1 + u 0 / α ) N this gives ( 1 + ∣ y ∣ 2 ) N ≤ C N + exp ( α ∣ y ∣ 2 ) (1+|y|^{2})^{N}\le C_{N}+\exp(\alpha|y|^{2}) ( 1 + ∣ y ∣ 2 ) N ≤ C N + exp ( α ∣ y ∣ 2 ) for every y ∈ X y\in X y ∈ X . The function y ↦ exp ( α ∣ y ∣ 2 ) y\mapsto\exp(\alpha|y|^{2}) y ↦ exp ( α ∣ y ∣ 2 ) is Borel and γ c \gamma_{c} γ c -integrable by Moments of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space: Coordinate Covariances, Finite Second Moment, and Exponential Moments of the Squared Norm §exponential , applied with this α \alpha α and with 1 / 2 1/2 1/2 in place of the number written θ \theta θ there, since 2 α c k ≤ 1 / 2 2\alpha c_{k}\le1/2 2 α c k ≤ 1/2 ; constants are integrable by claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space , so K N < ∞ K_{N}<\infty K N < ∞ by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative . The coordinate map p n p_{n} p n is linear with ∥ p n ( x ) ∥ ≤ ∣ x ∣ \lVert p_{n}(x)\rVert\le|x| ∥ p n ( x )∥ ≤ ∣ x ∣ by Orthonormal Expansions in a Real Hilbert Space §bessel , hence Lipschitz, continuous and Borel; and ( p n ) # γ c = γ n (p_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{n} ( p n ) # γ c = γ n by Diagonal Gaussian Measures on a Hilbert Space §measure , push-forwards being the image measures of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward . So claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables gives the transfer rule : ∫ R n g d γ n = ∫ X g ( p n x ) γ c ( d x ) \int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}g\,d\gamma_{n}=\int_{X}g(p_{n}x)\,\gamma_{c}(dx) ∫ R n g d γ n = ∫ X g ( p n x ) γ c ( d x ) for every Borel g : R n → [ 0 , ∞ ] g:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to[0,\infty] g : R n → [ 0 , ∞ ] , and a Borel g : R n → R g:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} g : R n → R is γ n \gamma_{n} γ n -integrable exactly when g ∘ p n g\circ p_{n} g ∘ p n is γ c \gamma_{c} γ c -integrable, with the same identity. In particular
∫ R n ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ 2 ) N γ n ( d z ) = ∫ X ( 1 + ∥ p n y ∥ 2 ) N γ c ( d y ) ≤ K N , \int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}(1+\lVert z\rVert^{2})^{N}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=\int_{X}(1+\lVert p_{n}y\rVert^{2})^{N}\,\gamma_{c}(dy)\le K_{N}, ∫ R n ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ 2 ) N γ n ( d z ) = ∫ X ( 1 + ∥ p n y ∥ 2 ) N γ c ( d y ) ≤ K N ,
and therefore, by (E2), ∫ ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ m ) γ n ( d z ) ≤ 2 K m \int(1+\lVert z\rVert^{m})\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\le2K_{m} ∫ ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ m ) γ n ( d z ) ≤ 2 K m for every m ∈ N ∪ { 0 } m\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\} m ∈ N ∪ { 0 } , and ∫ ∥ z ∥ 2 γ n ( d z ) ≤ K 1 \int\lVert z\rVert^{2}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\le K_{1} ∫ ∥ z ∥ 2 γ n ( d z ) ≤ K 1 . Since the k k k -th entry of p n ( y ) p_{n}(y) p n ( y ) is y k y_{k} y k , Moments of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space: Coordinate Covariances, Finite Second Moment, and Exponential Moments of the Squared Norm §coordinates and the transfer rule show that for j , k ∈ [ n ] j,k\in[n] j , k ∈ [ n ] the functions z ↦ z k z\mapsto z_{k} z ↦ z k and z ↦ z j z k z\mapsto z_{j}z_{k} z ↦ z j z k are γ n \gamma_{n} γ n -integrable, with ∫ z k γ n ( d z ) = 0 \int z_{k}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=0 ∫ z k γ n ( d z ) = 0 , ∫ z k 2 γ n ( d z ) = c k \int z_{k}^{2}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=c_{k} ∫ z k 2 γ n ( d z ) = c k , and ∫ z j z k γ n ( d z ) = 0 \int z_{j}z_{k}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=0 ∫ z j z k γ n ( d z ) = 0 for j ≠ k j\ne k j = k .
Step 3 (Measurability). Equip R n × R n \mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n} R n × R n with the product metric of two copies of ( R n , d E ) (\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}) ( R n , d E ) ; by Euclidean Space is a Separable Metric Space §separable and The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Product of Two Separable Metric Spaces is the Product Sigma-Algebra §product its Borel σ \sigma σ -algebra is B ( R n ) ⊗ B ( R n ) \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) B ( R n ) ⊗ B ( R n ) , on which the product measures of Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure are defined. A map between two of the spaces R \mathbb{R} R , R n \mathbb{R}^{n} R n , R n × R n \mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n} R n × R n each of whose entries is a constant plus a fixed real linear combination of the entries of the argument satisfies a Lipschitz bound, since by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n §coordinate each entry of the difference of two arguments is at most their distance; so such an affine map is continuous, hence Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space . Continuous real functions are Borel by the same claim, composites of Borel maps are Borel by claim 4 there, and sums, products, absolute values, maxima and positive and negative parts of measurable real functions are measurable by Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions and Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral . Every function on R n \mathbb{R}^{n} R n or on R n × R n \mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n} R n × R n integrated below is built in this way from Borel functions on R n \mathbb{R}^{n} R n and affine maps (for instance ( y , z ) ↦ φ ( a ⊙ y + b ⊙ z ) (y,z)\mapsto\varphi(\mathbf{a}\odot y+\mathbf{b}\odot z) ( y , z ) ↦ φ ( a ⊙ y + b ⊙ z ) with φ \varphi φ Borel), and is therefore Borel; we use this without further comment. The measures λ n \lambda_{n} λ n , γ n \gamma_{n} γ n , γ c \gamma_{c} γ c are σ \sigma σ -finite (λ n \lambda_{n} λ n by Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space is Sigma-Finite §sigma-finite , the others being probability measures), so Tonelli and Fubini Theorems applies to their products. A composite of continuous maps is continuous by Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §on-subset . Continuity at every point in the sense of clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set (continuity at a point ) coincides with continuity for the Euclidean distances in the sense of Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces : by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n §distance and Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n §square , the sums of squares occurring in the former are the squares of the corresponding distances, and for real a , b ≥ 0 a,b\ge0 a , b ≥ 0 one has a 2 < b 2 a^{2}<b^{2} a 2 < b 2 exactly when a < b a<b a < b , by claim 5 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities (the square root being strictly increasing, with a 2 = a \sqrt{a^{2}}=a a 2 = a ); so the two notions are used interchangeably.
Step 4 (Partial derivatives after an affine substitution). Let f : R n → R f:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} f : R n → R , a , b ∈ R n \mathbf{a},\mathbf{b}\in\mathbb{R}^{n} a , b ∈ R n , g ( v ) = f ( a + b ⊙ v ) g(v)=f(\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\odot v) g ( v ) = f ( a + b ⊙ v ) , k ∈ [ n ] k\in[n] k ∈ [ n ] and v ∈ R n v\in\mathbb{R}^{n} v ∈ R n , and suppose that the partial derivative ∂ k f ( w ) \partial_{k}f(w) ∂ k f ( w ) exists at w = a + b ⊙ v w=\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\odot v w = a + b ⊙ v . Then ∂ k g ( v ) \partial_{k}g(v) ∂ k g ( v ) exists and equals b k ∂ k f ( w ) \mathbf{b}_{k}\partial_{k}f(w) b k ∂ k f ( w ) . Indeed, for real h ≠ 0 h\ne0 h = 0 , a + b ⊙ ( v + h δ ( k ) ) = w + b k h δ ( k ) \mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\odot(v+h\delta^{(k)})=w+\mathbf{b}_{k}h\,\delta^{(k)} a + b ⊙ ( v + h δ ( k ) ) = w + b k h δ ( k ) . If b k = 0 \mathbf{b}_{k}=0 b k = 0 , the difference quotient of g g g is 0 = b k ∂ k f ( w ) 0=\mathbf{b}_{k}\partial_{k}f(w) 0 = b k ∂ k f ( w ) for every h h h . If b k ≠ 0 \mathbf{b}_{k}\ne0 b k = 0 and ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 , let δ > 0 \delta>0 δ > 0 be as in Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set for f f f at w w w and ε / ∣ b k ∣ \varepsilon/|\mathbf{b}_{k}| ε /∣ b k ∣ ; for 0 < ∣ h ∣ < δ / ∣ b k ∣ 0<|h|<\delta/|\mathbf{b}_{k}| 0 < ∣ h ∣ < δ /∣ b k ∣ the number h ′ = b k h h'=\mathbf{b}_{k}h h ′ = b k h satisfies 0 < ∣ h ′ ∣ < δ 0<|h'|<\delta 0 < ∣ h ′ ∣ < δ , and
∣ g ( v + h δ ( k ) ) − g ( v ) h − b k ∂ k f ( w ) ∣ = ∣ b k ∣ ∣ f ( w + h ′ δ ( k ) ) − f ( w ) h ′ − ∂ k f ( w ) ∣ < ε . \Bigl|\frac{g(v+h\delta^{(k)})-g(v)}{h}-\mathbf{b}_{k}\partial_{k}f(w)\Bigr|=|\mathbf{b}_{k}|\,\Bigl|\frac{f(w+h'\delta^{(k)})-f(w)}{h'}-\partial_{k}f(w)\Bigr|<\varepsilon . h g ( v + h δ ( k ) ) − g ( v ) − b k ∂ k f ( w ) = ∣ b k ∣ h ′ f ( w + h ′ δ ( k ) ) − f ( w ) − ∂ k f ( w ) < ε .
Since v ↦ a + b ⊙ v v\mapsto\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\odot v v ↦ a + b ⊙ v is continuous (Step 3) and a real multiple of a function of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 (directly from Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set ), clauses 1 to 4 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set give: if f f f is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 on R n \mathbb{R}^{n} R n , so is g g g , with ∂ k g ( v ) = b k ∂ k f ( a + b ⊙ v ) \partial_{k}g(v)=\mathbf{b}_{k}\partial_{k}f(\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\odot v) ∂ k g ( v ) = b k ∂ k f ( a + b ⊙ v ) ; and if f f f is of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 , then ∂ k g \partial_{k}g ∂ k g is b k \mathbf{b}_{k} b k times the function obtained in the same way from the C 1 C^{1} C 1 function ∂ k f \partial_{k}f ∂ k f , so g g g is of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 with ∂ l ∂ k g ( v ) = b l b k ∂ l ∂ k f ( a + b ⊙ v ) \partial_{l}\partial_{k}g(v)=\mathbf{b}_{l}\mathbf{b}_{k}\partial_{l}\partial_{k}f(\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\odot v) ∂ l ∂ k g ( v ) = b l b k ∂ l ∂ k f ( a + b ⊙ v ) . Consequently, if f f f and its first (and second) partial derivatives are bounded, so are those of g g g ; when ∣ b k ∣ ≤ 1 |\mathbf{b}_{k}|\le1 ∣ b k ∣ ≤ 1 for every k k k , with the same bounds.
Step 5 (Affine change of variables). Let a , b ∈ R n \mathbf{a},\mathbf{b}\in\mathbb{R}^{n} a , b ∈ R n with b k > 0 \mathbf{b}_{k}>0 b k > 0 for every k k k , and β = ∏ k = 1 n b k > 0 \beta=\prod_{k=1}^{n}\mathbf{b}_{k}>0 β = ∏ k = 1 n b k > 0 . Then for every Borel f : R n → [ 0 , ∞ ] f:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to[0,\infty] f : R n → [ 0 , ∞ ] ,
∫ f ( a + b ⊙ z ) d z = β − 1 ∫ f ( w ) d w in [ 0 , ∞ ] . \int f(\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\odot z)\,dz=\beta^{-1}\int f(w)\,dw\qquad\text{in }[0,\infty]. ∫ f ( a + b ⊙ z ) d z = β − 1 ∫ f ( w ) d w in [ 0 , ∞ ] .
Indeed, Φ ( z ) = a + b ⊙ z \Phi(z)=\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\odot z Φ ( z ) = a + b ⊙ z is a bijection of R n \mathbb{R}^{n} R n with inverse Φ − 1 ( w ) = b − 1 ⊙ ( w − a ) \Phi^{-1}(w)=\mathbf{b}^{-1}\odot(w-\mathbf{a}) Φ − 1 ( w ) = b − 1 ⊙ ( w − a ) . The coordinate functions v ↦ v j v\mapsto v_{j} v ↦ v j are continuous with constant partial derivatives 0 0 0 or 1 1 1 , directly from Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set ; so by Step 4 the components of Φ \Phi Φ and of Φ − 1 \Phi^{-1} Φ − 1 are of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 , and their Jacobian matrices are, at every point, the diagonal matrices with diagonal entries b k \mathbf{b}_{k} b k , respectively b k − 1 \mathbf{b}_{k}^{-1} b k − 1 . The first is symmetric and positive definite , since x ⋅ ( D Φ x ) = ∑ k b k x k 2 > 0 x\cdot(D\Phi\,x)=\sum_{k}\mathbf{b}_{k}x_{k}^{2}>0 x ⋅ ( D Φ x ) = ∑ k b k x k 2 > 0 for x ≠ 0 x\ne0 x = 0 ; the second is its inverse matrix; and det D Φ = β \det D\Phi=\beta det D Φ = β by The Determinant of a Triangular Matrix is the Product of its Diagonal Entries , a diagonal matrix being lower triangular. So Change of Variables for the Lebesgue Integral under a Continuously Differentiable Bijection of Euclidean Space with Symmetric Positive Definite Jacobian Matrix, and the Density of a Push-Forward §integrals gives ∫ ( f ∘ Φ ) β d z = ∫ f d w \int(f\circ\Phi)\,\beta\,dz=\int f\,dw ∫ ( f ∘ Φ ) β d z = ∫ f d w , and the claim follows by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative .
Step 6 (The coefficients). Let k ∈ N k\in\mathbb{N} k ∈ N . (i) For real y ≥ 0 y\ge0 y ≥ 0 , 0 ≤ 1 − exp ( − y ) ≤ y 0\le1-\exp(-y)\le y 0 ≤ 1 − exp ( − y ) ≤ y : by claim 6 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities , exp ( − y ) ≤ 1 \exp(-y)\le1 exp ( − y ) ≤ 1 and exp ( y ) − 1 ≤ y exp ( y ) \exp(y)-1\le y\exp(y) exp ( y ) − 1 ≤ y exp ( y ) , and multiplying the latter by exp ( − y ) > 0 \exp(-y)>0 exp ( − y ) > 0 gives 1 − exp ( − y ) ≤ y 1-\exp(-y)\le y 1 − exp ( − y ) ≤ y , since exp ( y ) exp ( − y ) = exp ( 0 ) = 1 \exp(y)\exp(-y)=\exp(0)=1 exp ( y ) exp ( − y ) = exp ( 0 ) = 1 by claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function . (ii) For real y > 0 y>0 y > 0 , ∣ 1 − exp ( − y ) y − 1 ∣ ≤ y exp ( y ) \bigl|\frac{1-\exp(-y)}{y}-1\bigr|\le y\exp(y) y 1 − e x p ( − y ) − 1 ≤ y exp ( y ) : by (i), exp ( − y ) ≥ 1 − y \exp(-y)\ge1-y exp ( − y ) ≥ 1 − y , and by claim 6 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities , y ≤ exp ( y ) − 1 ≤ y + y 2 exp ( y ) y\le\exp(y)-1\le y+y^{2}\exp(y) y ≤ exp ( y ) − 1 ≤ y + y 2 exp ( y ) ; as 1 − exp ( − y ) = exp ( − y ) ( exp ( y ) − 1 ) 1-\exp(-y)=\exp(-y)(\exp(y)-1) 1 − exp ( − y ) = exp ( − y ) ( exp ( y ) − 1 ) and 0 < exp ( − y ) ≤ 1 0<\exp(-y)\le1 0 < exp ( − y ) ≤ 1 , this gives ( 1 − y ) y ≤ 1 − exp ( − y ) ≤ y + y 2 exp ( y ) (1-y)y\le1-\exp(-y)\le y+y^{2}\exp(y) ( 1 − y ) y ≤ 1 − exp ( − y ) ≤ y + y 2 exp ( y ) , and y ≤ y exp ( y ) y\le y\exp(y) y ≤ y exp ( y ) . (iii) Hence, for real h > 0 h>0 h > 0 , 0 ≤ 1 − η k ( h ) ≤ θ k h 0\le1-\eta_{k}(h)\le\theta_{k}h 0 ≤ 1 − η k ( h ) ≤ θ k h and 0 ≤ ξ k ( h ) 2 = 1 − exp ( − 2 θ k h ) ≤ 2 θ k h 0\le\xi_{k}(h)^{2}=1-\exp(-2\theta_{k}h)\le2\theta_{k}h 0 ≤ ξ k ( h ) 2 = 1 − exp ( − 2 θ k h ) ≤ 2 θ k h , and
∣ 1 − η k ( h ) h − θ k ∣ ≤ θ k 2 h exp ( θ k h ) , ∣ ξ k ( h ) 2 h − 2 θ k ∣ ≤ 4 θ k 2 h exp ( 2 θ k h ) , \Bigl|\frac{1-\eta_{k}(h)}{h}-\theta_{k}\Bigr|\le\theta_{k}^{2}h\exp(\theta_{k}h),\qquad\Bigl|\frac{\xi_{k}(h)^{2}}{h}-2\theta_{k}\Bigr|\le4\theta_{k}^{2}h\exp(2\theta_{k}h), h 1 − η k ( h ) − θ k ≤ θ k 2 h exp ( θ k h ) , h ξ k ( h ) 2 − 2 θ k ≤ 4 θ k 2 h exp ( 2 θ k h ) ,
by (i) and (ii) with y = θ k h y=\theta_{k}h y = θ k h , respectively y = 2 θ k h y=2\theta_{k}h y = 2 θ k h ; for 0 < h ≤ 1 0<h\le1 0 < h ≤ 1 the right-hand sides are at most θ k 2 exp ( θ k ) h \theta_{k}^{2}\exp(\theta_{k})h θ k 2 exp ( θ k ) h and 4 θ k 2 exp ( 2 θ k ) h 4\theta_{k}^{2}\exp(2\theta_{k})h 4 θ k 2 exp ( 2 θ k ) h , exp \exp exp being increasing by claim 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function . (iv) If ( r m ) m ∈ N (r_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} ( r m ) m ∈ N is a sequence in [ 0 , ∞ ) [0,\infty) [ 0 , ∞ ) converging to r r r , then η k ( r m ) → η k ( r ) \eta_{k}(r_{m})\to\eta_{k}(r) η k ( r m ) → η k ( r ) and ξ k ( r m ) → ξ k ( r ) \xi_{k}(r_{m})\to\xi_{k}(r) ξ k ( r m ) → ξ k ( r ) , by claims 3(f) and 3(e) of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities . (v) η k ( 0 ) = 1 \eta_{k}(0)=1 η k ( 0 ) = 1 and ξ k ( 0 ) = 0 \xi_{k}(0)=0 ξ k ( 0 ) = 0 , since exp ( 0 ) = 1 \exp(0)=1 exp ( 0 ) = 1 ; for r > 0 r>0 r > 0 , exp ( − 2 θ k r ) < exp ( 0 ) = 1 \exp(-2\theta_{k}r)<\exp(0)=1 exp ( − 2 θ k r ) < exp ( 0 ) = 1 by claim 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function , so ξ k ( r ) > 0 \xi_{k}(r)>0 ξ k ( r ) > 0 by claim 5 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities . (vi) For real s , t ≥ 0 s,t\ge0 s , t ≥ 0 , claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function gives η k ( s ) η k ( t ) = η k ( s + t ) \eta_{k}(s)\eta_{k}(t)=\eta_{k}(s+t) η k ( s ) η k ( t ) = η k ( s + t ) , η k ( t ) 2 = exp ( − 2 θ k t ) \eta_{k}(t)^{2}=\exp(-2\theta_{k}t) η k ( t ) 2 = exp ( − 2 θ k t ) , and
η k ( t ) 2 ξ k ( s ) 2 + ξ k ( t ) 2 = exp ( − 2 θ k t ) ( 1 − exp ( − 2 θ k s ) ) + 1 − exp ( − 2 θ k t ) = 1 − exp ( − 2 θ k ( s + t ) ) = ξ k ( s + t ) 2 . \eta_{k}(t)^{2}\xi_{k}(s)^{2}+\xi_{k}(t)^{2}=\exp(-2\theta_{k}t)\bigl(1-\exp(-2\theta_{k}s)\bigr)+1-\exp(-2\theta_{k}t)=1-\exp(-2\theta_{k}(s+t))=\xi_{k}(s+t)^{2}. η k ( t ) 2 ξ k ( s ) 2 + ξ k ( t ) 2 = exp ( − 2 θ k t ) ( 1 − exp ( − 2 θ k s ) ) + 1 − exp ( − 2 θ k t ) = 1 − exp ( − 2 θ k ( s + t )) = ξ k ( s + t ) 2 .
Step 7 (Gaussian reflection). Let a , b ∈ R n \mathbf{a},\mathbf{b}\in\mathbb{R}^{n} a , b ∈ R n with b k > 0 \mathbf{b}_{k}>0 b k > 0 and a k 2 + b k 2 = 1 \mathbf{a}_{k}^{2}+\mathbf{b}_{k}^{2}=1 a k 2 + b k 2 = 1 for every k ∈ [ n ] k\in[n] k ∈ [ n ] , and let S : R n × R n → R n × R n S:\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n} S : R n × R n → R n × R n be the affine map S ( y , z ) = ( a ⊙ y + b ⊙ z , b ⊙ y − a ⊙ z ) S(y,z)=(\mathbf{a}\odot y+\mathbf{b}\odot z,\ \mathbf{b}\odot y-\mathbf{a}\odot z) S ( y , z ) = ( a ⊙ y + b ⊙ z , b ⊙ y − a ⊙ z ) .
(a) For every measurable f : R n × R n → [ 0 , ∞ ) f:\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n}\to[0,\infty) f : R n × R n → [ 0 , ∞ ) ,
∫ ( ∫ f ( S ( y , z ) ) γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) = ∫ ( ∫ f ( y , z ) γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) in [ 0 , ∞ ] , \int\Bigl(\int f(S(y,z))\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)=\int\Bigl(\int f(y,z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)\qquad\text{in }[0,\infty], ∫ ( ∫ f ( S ( y , z )) γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) = ∫ ( ∫ f ( y , z ) γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) in [ 0 , ∞ ] ,
the inner integrands and the inner integrals, as functions of y y y , being measurable by Tonelli and Fubini Theorems applied to γ n ⊗ γ n \gamma_{n}\otimes\gamma_{n} γ n ⊗ γ n .
(b) If f : R n × R n → R f:\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} f : R n × R n → R is measurable and ∣ f ( y , z ) ∣ ≤ K ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ m ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ m ) |f(y,z)|\le K(1+\lVert y\rVert^{m})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{m}) ∣ f ( y , z ) ∣ ≤ K ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ m ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ m ) for some real K ≥ 0 K\ge0 K ≥ 0 and m ∈ N ∪ { 0 } m\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\} m ∈ N ∪ { 0 } , then for every y y y the functions z ↦ f ( y , z ) z\mapsto f(y,z) z ↦ f ( y , z ) and z ↦ f ( S ( y , z ) ) z\mapsto f(S(y,z)) z ↦ f ( S ( y , z )) are γ n \gamma_{n} γ n -integrable, the functions y ↦ ∫ f ( y , z ) γ n ( d z ) y\mapsto\int f(y,z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz) y ↦ ∫ f ( y , z ) γ n ( d z ) and y ↦ ∫ f ( S ( y , z ) ) γ n ( d z ) y\mapsto\int f(S(y,z))\,\gamma_{n}(dz) y ↦ ∫ f ( S ( y , z )) γ n ( d z ) are γ n \gamma_{n} γ n -integrable, and the two iterated integrals of (a) are equal real numbers.
Proof of (a). Let β = ∏ k b k \beta=\prod_{k}\mathbf{b}_{k} β = ∏ k b k . For all y , z y,z y , z and k k k , ( a k y k + b k z k ) 2 + ( b k y k − a k z k ) 2 = y k 2 + z k 2 (\mathbf{a}_{k}y_{k}+\mathbf{b}_{k}z_{k})^{2}+(\mathbf{b}_{k}y_{k}-\mathbf{a}_{k}z_{k})^{2}=y_{k}^{2}+z_{k}^{2} ( a k y k + b k z k ) 2 + ( b k y k − a k z k ) 2 = y k 2 + z k 2 ; so the weighted squares of The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §scaling satisfy ∣ S 1 ( y , z ) ∣ c ( n ) 2 + ∣ S 2 ( y , z ) ∣ c ( n ) 2 = ∣ y ∣ c ( n ) 2 + ∣ z ∣ c ( n ) 2 |S_{1}(y,z)|^{2}_{c^{(n)}}+|S_{2}(y,z)|^{2}_{c^{(n)}}=|y|^{2}_{c^{(n)}}+|z|^{2}_{c^{(n)}} ∣ S 1 ( y , z ) ∣ c ( n ) 2 + ∣ S 2 ( y , z ) ∣ c ( n ) 2 = ∣ y ∣ c ( n ) 2 + ∣ z ∣ c ( n ) 2 , where S = ( S 1 , S 2 ) S=(S_{1},S_{2}) S = ( S 1 , S 2 ) , and The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §density with claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function gives
ρ n ( S 1 ( y , z ) ) ρ n ( S 2 ( y , z ) ) = ρ n ( y ) ρ n ( z ) . ( 7.1 ) \rho_{n}(S_{1}(y,z))\,\rho_{n}(S_{2}(y,z))=\rho_{n}(y)\,\rho_{n}(z).\qquad(7.1) ρ n ( S 1 ( y , z )) ρ n ( S 2 ( y , z )) = ρ n ( y ) ρ n ( z ) . ( 7.1 )
Put g ( w , v ) = ρ n ( w ) ρ n ( v ) f ( w , v ) g(w,v)=\rho_{n}(w)\rho_{n}(v)f(w,v) g ( w , v ) = ρ n ( w ) ρ n ( v ) f ( w , v ) , measurable and nonnegative, ρ n \rho_{n} ρ n being Borel and positive by The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Gradient, Normalization, Second Moments and Exponential Moments of Diagonal Quadratic Forms §regularity . By the density rule (twice), Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative (to move the factor ρ n ( y ) \rho_{n}(y) ρ n ( y ) inside) and (7.1), the left-hand side of (a) equals ∫ ( ∫ g ( S ( y , z ) ) d z ) d y \int\bigl(\int g(S(y,z))\,dz\bigr)dy ∫ ( ∫ g ( S ( y , z )) d z ) d y . Fix y y y and put k y ( w ) = g ( w , b − 1 ⊙ ( y − a ⊙ w ) ) k_{y}(w)=g\bigl(w,\mathbf{b}^{-1}\odot(y-\mathbf{a}\odot w)\bigr) k y ( w ) = g ( w , b − 1 ⊙ ( y − a ⊙ w ) ) . Since b k 2 = 1 − a k 2 \mathbf{b}_{k}^{2}=1-\mathbf{a}_{k}^{2} b k 2 = 1 − a k 2 , for every z z z
b − 1 ⊙ ( y − a ⊙ ( a ⊙ y + b ⊙ z ) ) = b − 1 ⊙ ( b ⊙ b ⊙ y − a ⊙ b ⊙ z ) = b ⊙ y − a ⊙ z , \mathbf{b}^{-1}\odot\bigl(y-\mathbf{a}\odot(\mathbf{a}\odot y+\mathbf{b}\odot z)\bigr)=\mathbf{b}^{-1}\odot(\mathbf{b}\odot\mathbf{b}\odot y-\mathbf{a}\odot\mathbf{b}\odot z)=\mathbf{b}\odot y-\mathbf{a}\odot z, b − 1 ⊙ ( y − a ⊙ ( a ⊙ y + b ⊙ z ) ) = b − 1 ⊙ ( b ⊙ b ⊙ y − a ⊙ b ⊙ z ) = b ⊙ y − a ⊙ z ,
that is, k y ( a ⊙ y + b ⊙ z ) = g ( S ( y , z ) ) k_{y}(\mathbf{a}\odot y+\mathbf{b}\odot z)=g(S(y,z)) k y ( a ⊙ y + b ⊙ z ) = g ( S ( y , z )) ; so Step 5 gives ∫ g ( S ( y , z ) ) d z = β − 1 ∫ k y ( w ) d w \int g(S(y,z))\,dz=\beta^{-1}\int k_{y}(w)\,dw ∫ g ( S ( y , z )) d z = β − 1 ∫ k y ( w ) d w . With the measurable function κ ( y , w ) = g ( w , b − 1 ⊙ ( y − a ⊙ w ) ) \kappa(y,w)=g\bigl(w,\mathbf{b}^{-1}\odot(y-\mathbf{a}\odot w)\bigr) κ ( y , w ) = g ( w , b − 1 ⊙ ( y − a ⊙ w ) ) on R n × R n \mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n} R n × R n , Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative and Tonelli and Fubini Theorems for λ n ⊗ λ n \lambda_{n}\otimes\lambda_{n} λ n ⊗ λ n give that the left-hand side equals β − 1 ∫ ( ∫ κ ( y , w ) d y ) d w \beta^{-1}\int\bigl(\int\kappa(y,w)\,dy\bigr)dw β − 1 ∫ ( ∫ κ ( y , w ) d y ) d w . Fix w w w ; for every v v v , κ ( a ⊙ w + b ⊙ v , w ) = g ( w , v ) \kappa(\mathbf{a}\odot w+\mathbf{b}\odot v,w)=g(w,v) κ ( a ⊙ w + b ⊙ v , w ) = g ( w , v ) , so Step 5 (with a ⊙ w \mathbf{a}\odot w a ⊙ w in place of a \mathbf{a} a ) gives ∫ g ( w , v ) d v = β − 1 ∫ κ ( y , w ) d y \int g(w,v)\,dv=\beta^{-1}\int\kappa(y,w)\,dy ∫ g ( w , v ) d v = β − 1 ∫ κ ( y , w ) d y . Hence the left-hand side equals ∫ ( ∫ g ( w , v ) d v ) d w = ∫ ( ∫ f ( w , v ) ρ n ( v ) d v ) ρ n ( w ) d w \int\bigl(\int g(w,v)\,dv\bigr)dw=\int\bigl(\int f(w,v)\rho_{n}(v)\,dv\bigr)\rho_{n}(w)\,dw ∫ ( ∫ g ( w , v ) d v ) d w = ∫ ( ∫ f ( w , v ) ρ n ( v ) d v ) ρ n ( w ) d w , which is the right-hand side by the density rule and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative .
Proof of (b). Since ∣ a k ∣ , ∣ b k ∣ ≤ 1 |\mathbf{a}_{k}|,|\mathbf{b}_{k}|\le1 ∣ a k ∣ , ∣ b k ∣ ≤ 1 , Step 1 and Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n §triangle give ∥ S 1 ( y , z ) ∥ , ∥ S 2 ( y , z ) ∥ ≤ ∥ y ∥ + ∥ z ∥ \lVert S_{1}(y,z)\rVert,\lVert S_{2}(y,z)\rVert\le\lVert y\rVert+\lVert z\rVert ∥ S 1 ( y , z )∥ , ∥ S 2 ( y , z )∥ ≤ ∥ y ∥ + ∥ z ∥ , so by (E3) and (E4)
∣ f ( S ( y , z ) ) ∣ ≤ K 2 2 m ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ m ) 2 ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ m ) 2 ≤ 2 2 m + 4 K ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ 2 m ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ 2 m ) , |f(S(y,z))|\le K\,2^{2m}(1+\lVert y\rVert^{m})^{2}(1+\lVert z\rVert^{m})^{2}\le2^{2m+4}K(1+\lVert y\rVert^{2m})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{2m}), ∣ f ( S ( y , z )) ∣ ≤ K 2 2 m ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ m ) 2 ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ m ) 2 ≤ 2 2 m + 4 K ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ 2 m ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ 2 m ) ,
and by (E4) also ∣ f ( y , z ) ∣ ≤ 4 K ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ 2 m ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ 2 m ) |f(y,z)|\le4K(1+\lVert y\rVert^{2m})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{2m}) ∣ f ( y , z ) ∣ ≤ 4 K ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ 2 m ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ 2 m ) . Let h h h be f f f or f ∘ S f\circ S f ∘ S , so ∣ h ( y , z ) ∣ ≤ K ′ ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ 2 m ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ 2 m ) |h(y,z)|\le K'(1+\lVert y\rVert^{2m})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{2m}) ∣ h ( y , z ) ∣ ≤ K ′ ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ 2 m ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ 2 m ) with K ′ = 2 2 m + 4 K K'=2^{2m+4}K K ′ = 2 2 m + 4 K . Then h + , h − ≤ ∣ h ∣ h^{+},h^{-}\le|h| h + , h − ≤ ∣ h ∣ , and by Step 2 and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative , ∫ ∣ h ( y , z ) ∣ γ n ( d z ) ≤ 2 K ′ K 2 m ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ 2 m ) < ∞ \int|h(y,z)|\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\le2K'K_{2m}(1+\lVert y\rVert^{2m})<\infty ∫ ∣ h ( y , z ) ∣ γ n ( d z ) ≤ 2 K ′ K 2 m ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ 2 m ) < ∞ for every y y y , so z ↦ h ( y , z ) z\mapsto h(y,z) z ↦ h ( y , z ) is integrable; the functions y ↦ ∫ h ± ( y , z ) γ n ( d z ) y\mapsto\int h^{\pm}(y,z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz) y ↦ ∫ h ± ( y , z ) γ n ( d z ) are measurable (Tonelli and Fubini Theorems ) with integrals at most 4 K ′ K 2 m 2 < ∞ 4K'K_{2m}^{2}<\infty 4 K ′ K 2 m 2 < ∞ ; hence y ↦ ∫ h ( y , z ) γ n ( d z ) = ∫ h + ( y , z ) γ n ( d z ) − ∫ h − ( y , z ) γ n ( d z ) y\mapsto\int h(y,z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=\int h^{+}(y,z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)-\int h^{-}(y,z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz) y ↦ ∫ h ( y , z ) γ n ( d z ) = ∫ h + ( y , z ) γ n ( d z ) − ∫ h − ( y , z ) γ n ( d z ) is integrable, and its integral is the difference of the iterated integrals of h + h^{+} h + and h − h^{-} h − , by Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable . Since ( f ∘ S ) ± = f ± ∘ S (f\circ S)^{\pm}=f^{\pm}\circ S ( f ∘ S ) ± = f ± ∘ S , (a) applied to f + f^{+} f + and to f − f^{-} f − gives the claim.
Step 8 (Products of one-dimensional integrals). Let g 1 , … , g n : R → R g_{1},\dots,g_{n}:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} g 1 , … , g n : R → R be Borel with ∫ ∣ g k ∣ d γ ( c k ) < ∞ \int|g_{k}|\,d\gamma_{(c_{k})}<\infty ∫ ∣ g k ∣ d γ ( c k ) < ∞ for every k k k . Then z ↦ ∏ k = 1 n g k ( z k ) z\mapsto\prod_{k=1}^{n}g_{k}(z_{k}) z ↦ ∏ k = 1 n g k ( z k ) is Borel and γ n \gamma_{n} γ n -integrable on R n \mathbb{R}^{n} R n , and
∫ R n ∏ k = 1 n g k ( z k ) γ n ( d z ) = ∏ k = 1 n ∫ R g k d γ ( c k ) . \int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\prod_{k=1}^{n}g_{k}(z_{k})\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=\prod_{k=1}^{n}\int_{\mathbb{R}}g_{k}\,d\gamma_{(c_{k})} . ∫ R n k = 1 ∏ n g k ( z k ) γ n ( d z ) = k = 1 ∏ n ∫ R g k d γ ( c k ) .
The function is Borel because the coordinate maps z ↦ z k z\mapsto z_{k} z ↦ z k are measurable by claims 1 and 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets (Step 3). We argue by induction on n n n . For n = 1 n=1 n = 1 , γ 1 = γ ( c 1 ) \gamma_{1}=\gamma_{(c_{1})} γ 1 = γ ( c 1 ) . Let n ≥ 2 n\ge2 n ≥ 2 and identify R n \mathbb{R}^{n} R n with R n − 1 × R \mathbb{R}^{n-1}\times\mathbb{R} R n − 1 × R , z = ( z ′ , s ) z=(z',s) z = ( z ′ , s ) , as in Finite Products of Lebesgue Measure and Coordinate Integration on R l \mathbb{R}^l R l ; by claim 1 there, Lebesgue Measure on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n and claim 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets , B ( R n ) = B ( R n − 1 ) ⊗ B ( R ) \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})=\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n-1})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) B ( R n ) = B ( R n − 1 ) ⊗ B ( R ) and λ n = λ n − 1 ⊗ λ 1 \lambda_{n}=\lambda_{n-1}\otimes\lambda_{1} λ n = λ n − 1 ⊗ λ 1 , both factors being σ \sigma σ -finite. Since ∣ z ∣ c ( n ) 2 = ∣ z ′ ∣ c ( n − 1 ) 2 + s 2 / c n |z|^{2}_{c^{(n)}}=|z'|^{2}_{c^{(n-1)}}+s^{2}/c_{n} ∣ z ∣ c ( n ) 2 = ∣ z ′ ∣ c ( n − 1 ) 2 + s 2 / c n and the normalising sum of The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §density for c ( n ) c^{(n)} c ( n ) is the sum of those for c ( n − 1 ) c^{(n-1)} c ( n − 1 ) and for ( c n ) (c_{n}) ( c n ) , claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function gives ρ n ( z ) = ρ n − 1 ( z ′ ) ρ ( c n ) ( s ) \rho_{n}(z)=\rho_{n-1}(z')\rho_{(c_{n})}(s) ρ n ( z ) = ρ n − 1 ( z ′ ) ρ ( c n ) ( s ) . Put a ( z ′ ) = ∏ k < n g k ( z k ′ ) ρ n − 1 ( z ′ ) a(z')=\prod_{k<n}g_{k}(z'_{k})\rho_{n-1}(z') a ( z ′ ) = ∏ k < n g k ( z k ′ ) ρ n − 1 ( z ′ ) and b ( s ) = g n ( s ) ρ ( c n ) ( s ) b(s)=g_{n}(s)\rho_{(c_{n})}(s) b ( s ) = g n ( s ) ρ ( c n ) ( s ) , so that ∏ k g k ( z k ) ρ n ( z ) = a ( z ′ ) b ( s ) \prod_{k}g_{k}(z_{k})\rho_{n}(z)=a(z')b(s) ∏ k g k ( z k ) ρ n ( z ) = a ( z ′ ) b ( s ) . By the induction hypothesis, applied to g 1 , … , g n − 1 g_{1},\dots,g_{n-1} g 1 , … , g n − 1 and to ∣ g 1 ∣ , … , ∣ g n − 1 ∣ |g_{1}|,\dots,|g_{n-1}| ∣ g 1 ∣ , … , ∣ g n − 1 ∣ , and the density rule, a a a is λ n − 1 \lambda_{n-1} λ n − 1 -integrable with ∫ a d λ n − 1 = ∏ k < n ∫ g k d γ ( c k ) \int a\,d\lambda_{n-1}=\prod_{k<n}\int g_{k}\,d\gamma_{(c_{k})} ∫ a d λ n − 1 = ∏ k < n ∫ g k d γ ( c k ) ; likewise b b b is λ 1 \lambda_{1} λ 1 -integrable with ∫ b d λ 1 = ∫ g n d γ ( c n ) \int b\,d\lambda_{1}=\int g_{n}\,d\gamma_{(c_{n})} ∫ b d λ 1 = ∫ g n d γ ( c n ) . For each choice of signs, the function ( z ′ , s ) ↦ a ± ( z ′ ) b ± ( s ) (z',s)\mapsto a^{\pm}(z')b^{\pm}(s) ( z ′ , s ) ↦ a ± ( z ′ ) b ± ( s ) is measurable for B ( R n − 1 ) ⊗ B ( R ) \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n-1})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) B ( R n − 1 ) ⊗ B ( R ) (the projections being measurable by Product Sigma-Algebra ), and Tonelli and Fubini Theorems with Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative gives ∫ a ± b ± d λ n = ∫ a ± d λ n − 1 ∫ b ± d λ 1 < ∞ \int a^{\pm}b^{\pm}\,d\lambda_{n}=\int a^{\pm}\,d\lambda_{n-1}\int b^{\pm}\,d\lambda_{1}<\infty ∫ a ± b ± d λ n = ∫ a ± d λ n − 1 ∫ b ± d λ 1 < ∞ . As ∣ a b ∣ = ( a + + a − ) ( b + + b − ) |ab|=(a^{+}+a^{-})(b^{+}+b^{-}) ∣ ab ∣ = ( a + + a − ) ( b + + b − ) and a b = a + b + − a + b − − a − b + + a − b − ab=a^{+}b^{+}-a^{+}b^{-}-a^{-}b^{+}+a^{-}b^{-} ab = a + b + − a + b − − a − b + + a − b − , the function a b ab ab is λ n \lambda_{n} λ n -integrable and, by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable and Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral , ∫ a b d λ n = ( ∫ a + − ∫ a − ) ( ∫ b + − ∫ b − ) = ∫ a d λ n − 1 ∫ b d λ 1 \int ab\,d\lambda_{n}=\bigl(\int a^{+}-\int a^{-}\bigr)\bigl(\int b^{+}-\int b^{-}\bigr)=\int a\,d\lambda_{n-1}\int b\,d\lambda_{1} ∫ ab d λ n = ( ∫ a + − ∫ a − ) ( ∫ b + − ∫ b − ) = ∫ a d λ n − 1 ∫ b d λ 1 . The density rule turns this into the claim.
Step 9 (The integrals φ r \varphi_{r} φ r ). Let φ \varphi φ be of polynomial growth with constants ( B φ , q ) (B_{\varphi},q) ( B φ , q ) and let r ≥ 0 r\ge0 r ≥ 0 . For u , z ∈ R n u,z\in\mathbb{R}^{n} u , z ∈ R n , Step 1 and Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n §triangle give ∥ η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z ∥ ≤ ∥ u ∥ + ∥ z ∥ \lVert\eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot z\rVert\le\lVert u\rVert+\lVert z\rVert ∥ η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z ∥ ≤ ∥ u ∥ + ∥ z ∥ , so by (E3)
∣ φ ( η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z ) ∣ ≤ B φ ( 1 + ( ∥ u ∥ + ∥ z ∥ ) q ) ≤ 2 q B φ ( 1 + ∥ u ∥ q ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ q ) . ( 9.1 ) |\varphi(\eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot z)|\le B_{\varphi}\bigl(1+(\lVert u\rVert+\lVert z\rVert)^{q}\bigr)\le2^{q}B_{\varphi}(1+\lVert u\rVert^{q})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{q}).\qquad(9.1) ∣ φ ( η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z ) ∣ ≤ B φ ( 1 + (∥ u ∥ + ∥ z ∥ ) q ) ≤ 2 q B φ ( 1 + ∥ u ∥ q ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ q ) . ( 9.1 )
The function z ↦ φ ( η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z ) z\mapsto\varphi(\eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot z) z ↦ φ ( η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z ) is continuous (Step 3), hence Borel, and by (9.1) and Step 2 it is γ n \gamma_{n} γ n -integrable; so φ r ( u ) \varphi_{r}(u) φ r ( u ) is defined, and by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable and Step 2
∣ φ r ( u ) ∣ ≤ B φ ′ ( 1 + ∥ u ∥ q ) , B φ ′ = 2 q + 1 B φ K q . ( 9.2 ) |\varphi_{r}(u)|\le B'_{\varphi}(1+\lVert u\rVert^{q}),\qquad B'_{\varphi}=2^{q+1}B_{\varphi}K_{q}.\qquad(9.2) ∣ φ r ( u ) ∣ ≤ B φ ′ ( 1 + ∥ u ∥ q ) , B φ ′ = 2 q + 1 B φ K q . ( 9.2 )
φ r \varphi_{r} φ r is continuous: let ( u m ) (u_{m}) ( u m ) converge to u u u in R n \mathbb{R}^{n} R n ; there is a real R R R with ∥ u m ∥ ≤ R \lVert u_{m}\rVert\le R ∥ u m ∥ ≤ R for every m m m (take R R R larger than ∥ u ∥ + 1 \lVert u\rVert+1 ∥ u ∥ + 1 and than the finitely many ∥ u m ∥ \lVert u_{m}\rVert ∥ u m ∥ with ∥ u m − u ∥ > 1 \lVert u_{m}-u\rVert>1 ∥ u m − u ∥ > 1 ). For every z z z , the points η ( r ) ⊙ u m + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z \eta(r)\odot u_{m}+\xi(r)\odot z η ( r ) ⊙ u m + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z converge to η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z \eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot z η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z , their distance being at most ∥ u m − u ∥ \lVert u_{m}-u\rVert ∥ u m − u ∥ by Step 1, so the integrands converge by Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §sequential ; by (9.1) they are dominated by the integrable function z ↦ 2 q B φ ( 1 + R q ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ q ) z\mapsto2^{q}B_{\varphi}(1+R^{q})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{q}) z ↦ 2 q B φ ( 1 + R q ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ q ) . So φ r ( u m ) → φ r ( u ) \varphi_{r}(u_{m})\to\varphi_{r}(u) φ r ( u m ) → φ r ( u ) by Dominated Convergence Theorem , and φ r \varphi_{r} φ r is continuous at u u u by Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §criterion . Thus φ r \varphi_{r} φ r is of polynomial growth with constants ( B φ ′ , q ) (B'_{\varphi},q) ( B φ ′ , q ) . Next, for fixed u u u :
r ↦ φ r ( u ) is continuous on [ 0 , ∞ ) . ( 9.3 ) r\mapsto\varphi_{r}(u)\ \text{is continuous on }[0,\infty).\qquad(9.3) r ↦ φ r ( u ) is continuous on [ 0 , ∞ ) . ( 9.3 )
Indeed, if ( r m ) (r_{m}) ( r m ) is a sequence in [ 0 , ∞ ) [0,\infty) [ 0 , ∞ ) converging to r r r , then by Step 6(iv) every entry of η ( r m ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r m ) ⊙ z \eta(r_{m})\odot u+\xi(r_{m})\odot z η ( r m ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r m ) ⊙ z converges to the corresponding entry of η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z \eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot z η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z , so these points converge in R n \mathbb{R}^{n} R n (by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n §square and claim 3(e) of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities ), the integrands converge by Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §sequential , they are dominated by 2 q B φ ( 1 + ∥ u ∥ q ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ q ) 2^{q}B_{\varphi}(1+\lVert u\rVert^{q})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{q}) 2 q B φ ( 1 + ∥ u ∥ q ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ q ) by (9.1), and Dominated Convergence Theorem and Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §criterion (with A = [ 0 , ∞ ) A=[0,\infty) A = [ 0 , ∞ ) ) apply. Finally:
( α 1 φ + α 2 χ ) r = α 1 φ r + α 2 χ r , φ r = φ if φ is constant , φ 0 = φ , ( 9.4 ) (\alpha_{1}\varphi+\alpha_{2}\chi)_{r}=\alpha_{1}\varphi_{r}+\alpha_{2}\chi_{r},\qquad\varphi_{r}=\varphi\ \text{if }\varphi\text{ is constant},\qquad\varphi_{0}=\varphi,\qquad(9.4) ( α 1 φ + α 2 χ ) r = α 1 φ r + α 2 χ r , φ r = φ if φ is constant , φ 0 = φ , ( 9.4 )
for χ \chi χ also of polynomial growth and real α 1 , α 2 \alpha_{1},\alpha_{2} α 1 , α 2 : the function α 1 φ + α 2 χ \alpha_{1}\varphi+\alpha_{2}\chi α 1 φ + α 2 χ is continuous and, by (E4), of polynomial growth with constants ( 2 ( ∣ α 1 ∣ B φ + ∣ α 2 ∣ B χ ) , max { q , q χ } ) (2(|\alpha_{1}|B_{\varphi}+|\alpha_{2}|B_{\chi}),\max\{q,q_{\chi}\}) ( 2 ( ∣ α 1 ∣ B φ + ∣ α 2 ∣ B χ ) , max { q , q χ }) , and the first identity is Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable ; the second is claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space , γ n \gamma_{n} γ n being a probability measure; and the third holds because η ( 0 ) = 1 \eta(0)=\mathbf{1} η ( 0 ) = 1 and ξ ( 0 ) = 0 \xi(0)=0 ξ ( 0 ) = 0 (Step 6(v)), so that the integrand of φ 0 ( u ) \varphi_{0}(u) φ 0 ( u ) is the constant φ ( u ) \varphi(u) φ ( u ) .
Step 10 (Cylindrical reduction). Let G ∈ F C p o l ( X ) G\in\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) G ∈ F C pol ( X ) have representation ( n , φ , B φ , q ) (n,\varphi,B_{\varphi},q) ( n , φ , B φ , q ) , let r ≥ 0 r\ge0 r ≥ 0 and x ∈ X x\in X x ∈ X , and put u = p n ( x ) u=p_{n}(x) u = p n ( x ) . Then P r G ( x ) = φ r ( u ) P_{r}G(x)=\varphi_{r}(u) P r G ( x ) = φ r ( u ) . Indeed, by The Mehler Maps and the Mehler Semigroup with Noise Weights on Continuous Cylindrical Functions of Polynomial Growth §map the k k k -th coordinate of M r ( x , y ) M_{r}(x,y) M r ( x , y ) is η k ( r ) x k + ξ k ( r ) y k \eta_{k}(r)x_{k}+\xi_{k}(r)y_{k} η k ( r ) x k + ξ k ( r ) y k , so p n ( M r ( x , y ) ) = η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ p n ( y ) p_{n}(M_{r}(x,y))=\eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot p_{n}(y) p n ( M r ( x , y )) = η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ p n ( y ) and G ( M r ( x , y ) ) = g ( p n ( y ) ) G(M_{r}(x,y))=g(p_{n}(y)) G ( M r ( x , y )) = g ( p n ( y )) for the Borel function g ( z ) = φ ( η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z ) g(z)=\varphi(\eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot z) g ( z ) = φ ( η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z ) , which is γ n \gamma_{n} γ n -integrable by Step 9. By the transfer rule of Step 2, the integral defining P r G ( x ) P_{r}G(x) P r G ( x ) in The Mehler Maps and the Mehler Semigroup with Noise Weights on Continuous Cylindrical Functions of Polynomial Growth §semigroup is ∫ X g ( p n y ) γ c ( d y ) = ∫ g d γ n = φ r ( u ) \int_{X}g(p_{n}y)\,\gamma_{c}(dy)=\int g\,d\gamma_{n}=\varphi_{r}(u) ∫ X g ( p n y ) γ c ( d y ) = ∫ g d γ n = φ r ( u ) .
Step 11 (Smoothing of bounded C 1 C^{1} C 1 functions). Let φ ∈ C b 1 ( R n ) \varphi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) φ ∈ C b 1 ( R n ) (Bounded Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded ), let C 0 , C 1 ≥ 0 C_{0},C_{1}\ge0 C 0 , C 1 ≥ 0 be real with ∣ φ ∣ ≤ C 0 |\varphi|\le C_{0} ∣ φ ∣ ≤ C 0 and ∣ ∂ k φ ∣ ≤ C 1 |\partial_{k}\varphi|\le C_{1} ∣ ∂ k φ ∣ ≤ C 1 for k ∈ [ n ] k\in[n] k ∈ [ n ] , and let r ≥ 0 r\ge0 r ≥ 0 . Then φ \varphi φ and each ∂ k φ \partial_{k}\varphi ∂ k φ are of polynomial growth with constants ( C 0 , 0 ) (C_{0},0) ( C 0 , 0 ) and ( C 1 , 0 ) (C_{1},0) ( C 1 , 0 ) , being continuous by clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set ; and φ r ∈ C b 1 ( R n ) \varphi_{r}\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) φ r ∈ C b 1 ( R n ) , with ∣ φ r ∣ ≤ C 0 |\varphi_{r}|\le C_{0} ∣ φ r ∣ ≤ C 0 and, for k ∈ [ n ] k\in[n] k ∈ [ n ] ,
∂ k ( φ r ) = η k ( r ) ( ∂ k φ ) r , ∣ ∂ k ( φ r ) ∣ ≤ C 1 . \partial_{k}(\varphi_{r})=\eta_{k}(r)\,(\partial_{k}\varphi)_{r},\qquad|\partial_{k}(\varphi_{r})|\le C_{1}. ∂ k ( φ r ) = η k ( r ) ( ∂ k φ ) r , ∣ ∂ k ( φ r ) ∣ ≤ C 1 .
Proof. Let G ( v ) = φ ( η ( r ) ⊙ v ) G(v)=\varphi(\eta(r)\odot v) G ( v ) = φ ( η ( r ) ⊙ v ) ; by Step 4, G G G is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 with ∂ k G ( v ) = η k ( r ) ∂ k φ ( η ( r ) ⊙ v ) \partial_{k}G(v)=\eta_{k}(r)\partial_{k}\varphi(\eta(r)\odot v) ∂ k G ( v ) = η k ( r ) ∂ k φ ( η ( r ) ⊙ v ) , so ∣ G ∣ ≤ C |G|\le C ∣ G ∣ ≤ C and ∣ ∂ k G ∣ ≤ C |\partial_{k}G|\le C ∣ ∂ k G ∣ ≤ C with C = max { C 0 , C 1 } C=\max\{C_{0},C_{1}\} C = max { C 0 , C 1 } . Let T ( z ) = − η ( r ) − 1 ⊙ ξ ( r ) ⊙ z T(z)=-\eta(r)^{-1}\odot\xi(r)\odot z T ( z ) = − η ( r ) − 1 ⊙ ξ ( r ) ⊙ z , a Borel map (Step 3), and μ = T # γ n \mu=T_{\#}\gamma_{n} μ = T # γ n , a probability measure on B ( R n ) \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) B ( R n ) by claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables . For u ∈ R n u\in\mathbb{R}^{n} u ∈ R n and a bounded Borel H : R n → R H:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} H : R n → R , claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables and claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space give ∫ H ( u − x ) μ ( d x ) = ∫ H ( u − T ( z ) ) γ n ( d z ) \int H(u-x)\,\mu(dx)=\int H(u-T(z))\,\gamma_{n}(dz) ∫ H ( u − x ) μ ( d x ) = ∫ H ( u − T ( z )) γ n ( d z ) , and η ( r ) ⊙ ( u − T ( z ) ) = η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z \eta(r)\odot(u-T(z))=\eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot z η ( r ) ⊙ ( u − T ( z )) = η ( r ) ⊙ u + ξ ( r ) ⊙ z . Hence, in the notation of The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral , ( G ∗ μ ) ( u ) = φ r ( u ) (G*\mu)(u)=\varphi_{r}(u) ( G ∗ μ ) ( u ) = φ r ( u ) and ( ( ∂ k G ) ∗ μ ) ( u ) = η k ( r ) ( ∂ k φ ) r ( u ) ((\partial_{k}G)*\mu)(u)=\eta_{k}(r)(\partial_{k}\varphi)_{r}(u) (( ∂ k G ) ∗ μ ) ( u ) = η k ( r ) ( ∂ k φ ) r ( u ) . By The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral §derivative , φ r = G ∗ μ \varphi_{r}=G*\mu φ r = G ∗ μ is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 with ∂ k ( φ r ) = ( ∂ k G ) ∗ μ = η k ( r ) ( ∂ k φ ) r \partial_{k}(\varphi_{r})=(\partial_{k}G)*\mu=\eta_{k}(r)(\partial_{k}\varphi)_{r} ∂ k ( φ r ) = ( ∂ k G ) ∗ μ = η k ( r ) ( ∂ k φ ) r . By The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral §continuous , applied to G G G with the bound C 0 C_{0} C 0 and to v ↦ ∂ k φ ( η ( r ) ⊙ v ) v\mapsto\partial_{k}\varphi(\eta(r)\odot v) v ↦ ∂ k φ ( η ( r ) ⊙ v ) with the bound C 1 C_{1} C 1 , ∣ φ r ∣ ≤ C 0 |\varphi_{r}|\le C_{0} ∣ φ r ∣ ≤ C 0 and ∣ ( ∂ k φ ) r ∣ ≤ C 1 |(\partial_{k}\varphi)_{r}|\le C_{1} ∣ ( ∂ k φ ) r ∣ ≤ C 1 ; and 0 < η k ( r ) ≤ 1 0<\eta_{k}(r)\le1 0 < η k ( r ) ≤ 1 .
Claim 1. Common length. Let ( n , ψ , B , q ) (n,\psi,B,q) ( n , ψ , B , q ) represent F F F and let N ≥ n N\ge n N ≥ n be a natural number. If N > n N>n N > n , let π : R N → R n \pi:\mathbb{R}^{N}\to\mathbb{R}^{n} π : R N → R n be the coordinate projection p r 1 n , N − n \mathrm{pr}^{n,N-n}_{1} pr 1 n , N − n of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §projections , which sends y y y to ( y 1 , … , y n ) (y_{1},\dots,y_{n}) ( y 1 , … , y n ) and satisfies ∥ π ( y ) ∥ ≤ ∥ y ∥ \lVert\pi(y)\rVert\le\lVert y\rVert ∥ π ( y )∥ ≤ ∥ y ∥ ; it is affine, hence continuous (Step 3). Then p n = π ∘ p N p_{n}=\pi\circ p_{N} p n = π ∘ p N , so F = ( ψ ∘ π ) ∘ p N F=(\psi\circ\pi)\circ p_{N} F = ( ψ ∘ π ) ∘ p N , and ψ ∘ π \psi\circ\pi ψ ∘ π is continuous with ∣ ψ ( π ( y ) ) ∣ ≤ B ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ q ) |\psi(\pi(y))|\le B(1+\lVert y\rVert^{q}) ∣ ψ ( π ( y )) ∣ ≤ B ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ q ) ; thus ( N , ψ ∘ π , B , q ) (N,\psi\circ\pi,B,q) ( N , ψ ∘ π , B , q ) is a representation of F F F . Consequently any two elements of F C p o l ( X ) \mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) F C pol ( X ) have representations with the same first entry, the larger of two given ones.
Algebraic closure. Let ( n , ψ , B , q ) (n,\psi,B,q) ( n , ψ , B , q ) and ( n , χ , B G , q G ) (n,\chi,B_{G},q_{G}) ( n , χ , B G , q G ) represent F F F and G G G , let α 1 ∈ R \alpha_{1}\in\mathbb{R} α 1 ∈ R , and put Q = max { q , q G } Q=\max\{q,q_{G}\} Q = max { q , q G } . Sums, products and real multiples of continuous functions are continuous (Step 3), and by (E4), ∣ ψ + χ ∣ ≤ 2 ( B + B G ) ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ Q ) |\psi+\chi|\le2(B+B_{G})(1+\lVert y\rVert^{Q}) ∣ ψ + χ ∣ ≤ 2 ( B + B G ) ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ Q ) , ∣ ψ χ ∣ ≤ 4 B B G ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ q + q G ) |\psi\chi|\le4BB_{G}(1+\lVert y\rVert^{q+q_{G}}) ∣ ψ χ ∣ ≤ 4 B B G ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ q + q G ) and ∣ α 1 ψ ∣ ≤ ∣ α 1 ∣ B ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ q ) |\alpha_{1}\psi|\le|\alpha_{1}|B(1+\lVert y\rVert^{q}) ∣ α 1 ψ ∣ ≤ ∣ α 1 ∣ B ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ q ) . So F + G = ( ψ + χ ) ∘ p n F+G=(\psi+\chi)\circ p_{n} F + G = ( ψ + χ ) ∘ p n , F G = ( ψ χ ) ∘ p n FG=(\psi\chi)\circ p_{n} FG = ( ψ χ ) ∘ p n and α 1 F = ( α 1 ψ ) ∘ p n \alpha_{1}F=(\alpha_{1}\psi)\circ p_{n} α 1 F = ( α 1 ψ ) ∘ p n belong to F C p o l ( X ) \mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) F C pol ( X ) . The constant function with value α 1 \alpha_{1} α 1 is φ ∘ p 1 \varphi\circ p_{1} φ ∘ p 1 with φ \varphi φ the constant function α 1 \alpha_{1} α 1 on R 1 \mathbb{R}^{1} R 1 , so ( 1 , φ , ∣ α 1 ∣ , 0 ) (1,\varphi,|\alpha_{1}|,0) ( 1 , φ , ∣ α 1 ∣ , 0 ) represents it.
Cylindrical classes. If φ ∈ F C b 1 ( X ) \varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) φ ∈ F C b 1 ( X ) has representation ( n , ψ ) (n,\psi) ( n , ψ ) , then ψ ∈ C b 1 ( R n ) \psi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) ψ ∈ C b 1 ( R n ) is continuous by clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set and bounded by some real B ≥ 0 B\ge0 B ≥ 0 by Bounded Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded , so ( n , ψ , B , 0 ) (n,\psi,B,0) ( n , ψ , B , 0 ) represents φ \varphi φ . Every element of F C b 2 ( X ) \mathcal{F}C^{2}_{b}(X) F C b 2 ( X ) belongs to F C b 1 ( X ) \mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) F C b 1 ( X ) by The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Operator with Noise Weights on Bounded C^2 Cylindrical Functions §second-derivatives . For α ∈ A \alpha\in\mathcal{A} α ∈ A with length bound n n n , Cylindrical Hermite Polynomials: Growth and Integrability, Partial Derivatives, Orthogonality, and Monomials as Hermite Combinations §cylindrical gives H α = h α ∘ p n H_{\alpha}=h_{\alpha}\circ p_{n} H α = h α ∘ p n with h α ( y ) = ∏ k = 1 n H α k c k ( y k ) h_{\alpha}(y)=\prod_{k=1}^{n}H^{c_{k}}_{\alpha_{k}}(y_{k}) h α ( y ) = ∏ k = 1 n H α k c k ( y k ) of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 , hence continuous, and ∣ h α ( y ) ∣ ≤ M ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ ∣ α ∣ ) |h_{\alpha}(y)|\le M(1+\lVert y\rVert^{|\alpha|}) ∣ h α ( y ) ∣ ≤ M ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ ∣ α ∣ ) , where M ≥ 0 M\ge0 M ≥ 0 because 0 ≤ ∣ h α ( 0 ) ∣ ≤ M ( 1 + ∥ 0 ∥ ∣ α ∣ ) 0\le|h_{\alpha}(0)|\le M(1+\lVert0\rVert^{|\alpha|}) 0 ≤ ∣ h α ( 0 ) ∣ ≤ M ( 1 + ∥ 0 ∥ ∣ α ∣ ) and 1 + ∥ 0 ∥ ∣ α ∣ > 0 1+\lVert0\rVert^{|\alpha|}>0 1 + ∥ 0 ∥ ∣ α ∣ > 0 ; so ( n , h α , M , ∣ α ∣ ) (n,h_{\alpha},M,|\alpha|) ( n , h α , M , ∣ α ∣ ) represents H α H_{\alpha} H α .
Continuity and integrability. With ( n , ψ , B , q ) (n,\psi,B,q) ( n , ψ , B , q ) representing F F F , F = ψ ∘ p n F=\psi\circ p_{n} F = ψ ∘ p n is a composite of continuous maps (Step 2), hence continuous, and Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space . Let p ≥ 1 p\ge1 p ≥ 1 be real and m ∈ N m\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N with p ≤ m p\le m p ≤ m . Since ∥ p n x ∥ ≤ ∣ x ∣ \lVert p_{n}x\rVert\le|x| ∥ p n x ∥ ≤ ∣ x ∣ , (E2) gives ∣ F ( x ) ∣ ≤ 2 B ( 1 + ∣ x ∣ 2 ) q |F(x)|\le2B(1+|x|^{2})^{q} ∣ F ( x ) ∣ ≤ 2 B ( 1 + ∣ x ∣ 2 ) q ; so by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone , Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §product , Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §agreement and (E5) applied to ( 1 + ∣ x ∣ 2 ) q ≥ 1 (1+|x|^{2})^{q}\ge1 ( 1 + ∣ x ∣ 2 ) q ≥ 1 ,
∣ F ( x ) ∣ p ≤ ( 2 B ) p ( ( 1 + ∣ x ∣ 2 ) q ) p ≤ 2 ( 2 B ) p ( 1 + ∣ x ∣ 2 ) q m . |F(x)|^{p}\le(2B)^{p}\bigl((1+|x|^{2})^{q}\bigr)^{p}\le2(2B)^{p}(1+|x|^{2})^{qm}. ∣ F ( x ) ∣ p ≤ ( 2 B ) p ( ( 1 + ∣ x ∣ 2 ) q ) p ≤ 2 ( 2 B ) p ( 1 + ∣ x ∣ 2 ) q m .
The function ∣ F ∣ p |F|^{p} ∣ F ∣ p is measurable by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §measurable-power , and Step 2 with Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative gives ∫ X ∣ F ∣ p d γ c ≤ 2 ( 2 B ) p K q m < ∞ \int_{X}|F|^{p}\,d\gamma_{c}\le2(2B)^{p}K_{qm}<\infty ∫ X ∣ F ∣ p d γ c ≤ 2 ( 2 B ) p K q m < ∞ ; so F ∈ L p ( γ c ) F\in L^{p}(\gamma_{c}) F ∈ L p ( γ c ) by Gaussian Analysis Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure with Noise Weights: Standing Notation §lebesgue . The same argument shows that every Borel g : R n → R g:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} g : R n → R with ∣ g ( z ) ∣ ≤ C ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ q ) |g(z)|\le C(1+\lVert z\rVert^{q}) ∣ g ( z ) ∣ ≤ C ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ q ) satisfies ∫ ∣ g ∣ p d γ n ≤ 2 ( 2 C ) p K q m \int|g|^{p}\,d\gamma_{n}\le2(2C)^{p}K_{qm} ∫ ∣ g ∣ p d γ n ≤ 2 ( 2 C ) p K q m , by Step 2.
Claim 2. Let ( n , ψ , B , q ) (n,\psi,B,q) ( n , ψ , B , q ) represent F F F . By Step 9 (with φ = ψ \varphi=\psi φ = ψ ) the integrand is integrable, ψ t \psi_{t} ψ t is continuous, and ∣ ψ r ( u ) ∣ ≤ B ′ ( 1 + ∥ u ∥ q ) |\psi_{r}(u)|\le B'(1+\lVert u\rVert^{q}) ∣ ψ r ( u ) ∣ ≤ B ′ ( 1 + ∥ u ∥ q ) for every real r ≥ 0 r\ge0 r ≥ 0 and u ∈ R n u\in\mathbb{R}^{n} u ∈ R n , with B ′ = 2 q + 1 B K q B'=2^{q+1}BK_{q} B ′ = 2 q + 1 B K q , which depends only on B B B , q q q and c c c . By Step 10, P t F = ψ t ∘ p n P_{t}F=\psi_{t}\circ p_{n} P t F = ψ t ∘ p n ; so ( n , ψ t , B ′ , q ) (n,\psi_{t},B',q) ( n , ψ t , B ′ , q ) is a representation of P t F ∈ F C p o l ( X ) P_{t}F\in\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) P t F ∈ F C pol ( X ) . By (9.4), P 0 F = ψ 0 ∘ p n = ψ ∘ p n = F P_{0}F=\psi_{0}\circ p_{n}=\psi\circ p_{n}=F P 0 F = ψ 0 ∘ p n = ψ ∘ p n = F . For F , G ∈ F C p o l ( X ) F,G\in\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) F , G ∈ F C pol ( X ) and real α 1 , α 2 \alpha_{1},\alpha_{2} α 1 , α 2 , α 1 F + α 2 G ∈ F C p o l ( X ) \alpha_{1}F+\alpha_{2}G\in\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) α 1 F + α 2 G ∈ F C pol ( X ) by claim 1, and for x ∈ X x\in X x ∈ X the functions y ↦ F ( M t ( x , y ) ) y\mapsto F(M_{t}(x,y)) y ↦ F ( M t ( x , y )) and y ↦ G ( M t ( x , y ) ) y\mapsto G(M_{t}(x,y)) y ↦ G ( M t ( x , y )) are γ c \gamma_{c} γ c -integrable by The Mehler Maps and the Mehler Semigroup with Noise Weights on Continuous Cylindrical Functions of Polynomial Growth §semigroup ; so P t ( α 1 F + α 2 G ) ( x ) = α 1 P t F ( x ) + α 2 P t G ( x ) P_{t}(\alpha_{1}F+\alpha_{2}G)(x)=\alpha_{1}P_{t}F(x)+\alpha_{2}P_{t}G(x) P t ( α 1 F + α 2 G ) ( x ) = α 1 P t F ( x ) + α 2 P t G ( x ) by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable . For the constant function with value α 1 \alpha_{1} α 1 , its image under P t P_{t} P t has the value ∫ X α 1 γ c ( d y ) = α 1 \int_{X}\alpha_{1}\,\gamma_{c}(dy)=\alpha_{1} ∫ X α 1 γ c ( d y ) = α 1 at every x x x , by claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space , γ c \gamma_{c} γ c being a probability measure.
Claim 3. If s = 0 s=0 s = 0 or t = 0 t=0 t = 0 , the claim follows from P 0 G = G P_{0}G=G P 0 G = G for every G ∈ F C p o l ( X ) G\in\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) G ∈ F C pol ( X ) (claim 2). Let s , t > 0 s,t>0 s , t > 0 and let ( n , ψ , B , q ) (n,\psi,B,q) ( n , ψ , B , q ) represent F F F . By claim 2, ( n , ψ t , B ′ , q ) (n,\psi_{t},B',q) ( n , ψ t , B ′ , q ) represents P t F P_{t}F P t F , so P s ( P t F ) = ( ψ t ) s ∘ p n P_{s}(P_{t}F)=(\psi_{t})_{s}\circ p_{n} P s ( P t F ) = ( ψ t ) s ∘ p n by Step 10, and it suffices to show ( ψ t ) s ( u ) = ψ s + t ( u ) (\psi_{t})_{s}(u)=\psi_{s+t}(u) ( ψ t ) s ( u ) = ψ s + t ( u ) for u ∈ R n u\in\mathbb{R}^{n} u ∈ R n . Put σ = ξ ( s + t ) \sigma=\xi(s+t) σ = ξ ( s + t ) , whose entries are positive by Step 6(v), a = σ − 1 ⊙ η ( t ) ⊙ ξ ( s ) \mathbf{a}=\sigma^{-1}\odot\eta(t)\odot\xi(s) a = σ − 1 ⊙ η ( t ) ⊙ ξ ( s ) and b = σ − 1 ⊙ ξ ( t ) \mathbf{b}=\sigma^{-1}\odot\xi(t) b = σ − 1 ⊙ ξ ( t ) ; then b k > 0 \mathbf{b}_{k}>0 b k > 0 by Step 6(v) and a k 2 + b k 2 = 1 \mathbf{a}_{k}^{2}+\mathbf{b}_{k}^{2}=1 a k 2 + b k 2 = 1 by Step 6(vi). Since η ( t ) ⊙ η ( s ) = η ( s + t ) \eta(t)\odot\eta(s)=\eta(s+t) η ( t ) ⊙ η ( s ) = η ( s + t ) by Step 6(vi), for all y , z ∈ R n y,z\in\mathbb{R}^{n} y , z ∈ R n
η ( t ) ⊙ ( η ( s ) ⊙ u + ξ ( s ) ⊙ y ) + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z = η ( s + t ) ⊙ u + σ ⊙ ( a ⊙ y + b ⊙ z ) . \eta(t)\odot\bigl(\eta(s)\odot u+\xi(s)\odot y\bigr)+\xi(t)\odot z=\eta(s+t)\odot u+\sigma\odot(\mathbf{a}\odot y+\mathbf{b}\odot z). η ( t ) ⊙ ( η ( s ) ⊙ u + ξ ( s ) ⊙ y ) + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z = η ( s + t ) ⊙ u + σ ⊙ ( a ⊙ y + b ⊙ z ) .
Let ϕ ( w ) = ψ ( η ( s + t ) ⊙ u + σ ⊙ w ) \phi(w)=\psi(\eta(s+t)\odot u+\sigma\odot w) ϕ ( w ) = ψ ( η ( s + t ) ⊙ u + σ ⊙ w ) and f ( y , z ) = ϕ ( y ) f(y,z)=\phi(y) f ( y , z ) = ϕ ( y ) ; by (9.1), ∣ f ( y , z ) ∣ ≤ 2 q B ( 1 + ∥ u ∥ q ) ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ q ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ q ) |f(y,z)|\le2^{q}B(1+\lVert u\rVert^{q})(1+\lVert y\rVert^{q})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{q}) ∣ f ( y , z ) ∣ ≤ 2 q B ( 1 + ∥ u ∥ q ) ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ q ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ q ) . With S S S the map of Step 7 for these a , b \mathbf{a},\mathbf{b} a , b , f ( S ( y , z ) ) = ϕ ( a ⊙ y + b ⊙ z ) f(S(y,z))=\phi(\mathbf{a}\odot y+\mathbf{b}\odot z) f ( S ( y , z )) = ϕ ( a ⊙ y + b ⊙ z ) , so by the displayed identity, Step 7(b) and claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space ,
( ψ t ) s ( u ) = ∫ ( ∫ f ( S ( y , z ) ) γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) = ∫ ( ∫ ϕ ( y ) γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) = ∫ ϕ d γ n = ψ s + t ( u ) . (\psi_{t})_{s}(u)=\int\Bigl(\int f(S(y,z))\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)=\int\Bigl(\int\phi(y)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)=\int\phi\,d\gamma_{n}=\psi_{s+t}(u). ( ψ t ) s ( u ) = ∫ ( ∫ f ( S ( y , z )) γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) = ∫ ( ∫ ϕ ( y ) γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) = ∫ ϕ d γ n = ψ s + t ( u ) .
Claim 4. Let ( n , ψ , B , q ) (n,\psi,B,q) ( n , ψ , B , q ) represent F F F . By claims 1 and 2 and the transfer rule, ∫ X P t F d γ c = ∫ ψ t d γ n \int_{X}P_{t}F\,d\gamma_{c}=\int\psi_{t}\,d\gamma_{n} ∫ X P t F d γ c = ∫ ψ t d γ n and ∫ X F d γ c = ∫ ψ d γ n \int_{X}F\,d\gamma_{c}=\int\psi\,d\gamma_{n} ∫ X F d γ c = ∫ ψ d γ n , all these integrals existing. For t = 0 t=0 t = 0 there is nothing to prove. For t > 0 t>0 t > 0 , apply Step 7(b) with a = η ( t ) \mathbf{a}=\eta(t) a = η ( t ) and b = ξ ( t ) \mathbf{b}=\xi(t) b = ξ ( t ) (admissible by Step 6(v) and The Mehler Maps and the Mehler Semigroup with Noise Weights on Continuous Cylindrical Functions of Polynomial Growth §map ) to f ( y , z ) = ψ ( y ) f(y,z)=\psi(y) f ( y , z ) = ψ ( y ) , for which ∣ f ( y , z ) ∣ ≤ B ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ q ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ q ) |f(y,z)|\le B(1+\lVert y\rVert^{q})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{q}) ∣ f ( y , z ) ∣ ≤ B ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ q ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ q ) and f ( S ( y , z ) ) = ψ ( η ( t ) ⊙ y + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z ) f(S(y,z))=\psi(\eta(t)\odot y+\xi(t)\odot z) f ( S ( y , z )) = ψ ( η ( t ) ⊙ y + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z ) :
∫ ψ t d γ n = ∫ ( ∫ f ( S ( y , z ) ) γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) = ∫ ( ∫ ψ ( y ) γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) = ∫ ψ d γ n , \int\psi_{t}\,d\gamma_{n}=\int\Bigl(\int f(S(y,z))\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)=\int\Bigl(\int\psi(y)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)=\int\psi\,d\gamma_{n}, ∫ ψ t d γ n = ∫ ( ∫ f ( S ( y , z )) γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) = ∫ ( ∫ ψ ( y ) γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) = ∫ ψ d γ n ,
the last step by claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space .
Claim 5. For x ∈ X x\in X x ∈ X , P t F ( x ) P_{t}F(x) P t F ( x ) is the integral of the γ c \gamma_{c} γ c -integrable function y ↦ F ( M t ( x , y ) ) y\mapsto F(M_{t}(x,y)) y ↦ F ( M t ( x , y )) (The Mehler Maps and the Mehler Semigroup with Noise Weights on Continuous Cylindrical Functions of Polynomial Growth §semigroup ), which is nonnegative; so P t F ( x ) ≥ ∫ X 0 d γ c = 0 P_{t}F(x)\ge\int_{X}0\,d\gamma_{c}=0 P t F ( x ) ≥ ∫ X 0 d γ c = 0 by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable .
Claim 6. Let p ≥ 1 p\ge1 p ≥ 1 be real. For t = 0 t=0 t = 0 there is nothing to prove; let t > 0 t>0 t > 0 and let ( n , ψ , B , q ) (n,\psi,B,q) ( n , ψ , B , q ) represent F F F . Fix u ∈ R n u\in\mathbb{R}^{n} u ∈ R n and let g ( z ) = ψ ( η ( t ) ⊙ u + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z ) g(z)=\psi(\eta(t)\odot u+\xi(t)\odot z) g ( z ) = ψ ( η ( t ) ⊙ u + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z ) , which by (9.1) and the last sentence of claim 1 is γ n \gamma_{n} γ n -integrable and satisfies ∫ ∣ g ∣ p d γ n < ∞ \int|g|^{p}\,d\gamma_{n}<\infty ∫ ∣ g ∣ p d γ n < ∞ . We show
∣ ψ t ( u ) ∣ p ≤ ∫ ∣ g ∣ p d γ n . ( 6.1 ) |\psi_{t}(u)|^{p}\le\int|g|^{p}\,d\gamma_{n}.\qquad(6.1) ∣ ψ t ( u ) ∣ p ≤ ∫ ∣ g ∣ p d γ n . ( 6.1 )
For p = 1 p=1 p = 1 this is Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable . For p > 1 p>1 p > 1 let p ′ p' p ′ be its conjugate exponent ; the constant function 1 1 1 has p ′ p' p ′ -seminorm ( ∫ 1 p ′ d γ n ) 1 / p ′ = 1 (\int1^{p'}d\gamma_{n})^{1/p'}=1 ( ∫ 1 p ′ d γ n ) 1/ p ′ = 1 (Step 1 and claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space ), so Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable and Hoelder's Inequality, for Two and for Finitely Many Factors §holder give ∣ ψ t ( u ) ∣ ≤ ∫ ∣ g ∣ d γ n ≤ ∥ g ∥ p |\psi_{t}(u)|\le\int|g|\,d\gamma_{n}\le\lVert g\rVert_{p} ∣ ψ t ( u ) ∣ ≤ ∫ ∣ g ∣ d γ n ≤ ∥ g ∥ p , with the seminorm of Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §seminorm , and (6.1) follows by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone and Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §inverse . Now apply Step 7(a) with a = η ( t ) \mathbf{a}=\eta(t) a = η ( t ) , b = ξ ( t ) \mathbf{b}=\xi(t) b = ξ ( t ) to the nonnegative measurable function f ( y , z ) = ∣ ψ ( y ) ∣ p f(y,z)=|\psi(y)|^{p} f ( y , z ) = ∣ ψ ( y ) ∣ p (Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §measurable-power ), for which f ( S ( y , z ) ) = ∣ ψ ( η ( t ) ⊙ y + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z ) ∣ p f(S(y,z))=|\psi(\eta(t)\odot y+\xi(t)\odot z)|^{p} f ( S ( y , z )) = ∣ ψ ( η ( t ) ⊙ y + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z ) ∣ p . By claim 2, the transfer rule, (6.1), Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative , Step 7(a) and claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space ,
∫ X ∣ P t F ∣ p d γ c = ∫ ∣ ψ t ∣ p d γ n ≤ ∫ ( ∫ ∣ ψ ( η ( t ) ⊙ y + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z ) ∣ p γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) = ∫ ∣ ψ ∣ p d γ n = ∫ X ∣ F ∣ p d γ c . \int_{X}|P_{t}F|^{p}\,d\gamma_{c}=\int|\psi_{t}|^{p}\,d\gamma_{n}\le\int\Bigl(\int|\psi(\eta(t)\odot y+\xi(t)\odot z)|^{p}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)=\int|\psi|^{p}\,d\gamma_{n}=\int_{X}|F|^{p}\,d\gamma_{c}. ∫ X ∣ P t F ∣ p d γ c = ∫ ∣ ψ t ∣ p d γ n ≤ ∫ ( ∫ ∣ ψ ( η ( t ) ⊙ y + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z ) ∣ p γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) = ∫ ∣ ψ ∣ p d γ n = ∫ X ∣ F ∣ p d γ c .
Taking powers with exponent 1 / p 1/p 1/ p (Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone ) gives ∥ P t F ∥ p ≤ ∥ F ∥ p \lVert P_{t}F\rVert_{p}\le\lVert F\rVert_{p} ∥ P t F ∥ p ≤ ∥ F ∥ p , by The Lebesgue Space of Power-Integrable Functions §norm and Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §seminorm .
Claim 7. By claims 1 and 2, G P t F G\,P_{t}F G P t F and F P t G F\,P_{t}G F P t G belong to F C p o l ( X ) \mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) F C pol ( X ) , hence are γ c \gamma_{c} γ c -integrable. If t = 0 t=0 t = 0 both equal F G FG FG . Let t > 0 t>0 t > 0 . By claim 1 choose representations ( n , ψ , B , q ) (n,\psi,B,q) ( n , ψ , B , q ) of F F F and ( n , χ , B G , q G ) (n,\chi,B_{G},q_{G}) ( n , χ , B G , q G ) of G G G with the same n n n . By claim 2 and the transfer rule, ∫ X G P t F d γ c = ∫ χ ψ t d γ n \int_{X}G\,P_{t}F\,d\gamma_{c}=\int\chi\,\psi_{t}\,d\gamma_{n} ∫ X G P t F d γ c = ∫ χ ψ t d γ n and ∫ X F P t G d γ c = ∫ ψ χ t d γ n \int_{X}F\,P_{t}G\,d\gamma_{c}=\int\psi\,\chi_{t}\,d\gamma_{n} ∫ X F P t G d γ c = ∫ ψ χ t d γ n . Let f ( y , z ) = χ ( y ) ψ ( η ( t ) ⊙ y + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z ) f(y,z)=\chi(y)\,\psi(\eta(t)\odot y+\xi(t)\odot z) f ( y , z ) = χ ( y ) ψ ( η ( t ) ⊙ y + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z ) ; by (9.1) and (E4), ∣ f ( y , z ) ∣ ≤ K ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ m ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ m ) |f(y,z)|\le K(1+\lVert y\rVert^{m})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{m}) ∣ f ( y , z ) ∣ ≤ K ( 1 + ∥ y ∥ m ) ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ m ) with m = q + q G m=q+q_{G} m = q + q G and K = 2 q + 3 B B G K=2^{q+3}BB_{G} K = 2 q + 3 B B G . Let S S S be the map of Step 7 for a = η ( t ) \mathbf{a}=\eta(t) a = η ( t ) , b = ξ ( t ) \mathbf{b}=\xi(t) b = ξ ( t ) . Since η k ( t ) 2 + ξ k ( t ) 2 = 1 \eta_{k}(t)^{2}+\xi_{k}(t)^{2}=1 η k ( t ) 2 + ξ k ( t ) 2 = 1 ,
η ( t ) ⊙ ( η ( t ) ⊙ y + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z ) + ξ ( t ) ⊙ ( ξ ( t ) ⊙ y − η ( t ) ⊙ z ) = y , \eta(t)\odot\bigl(\eta(t)\odot y+\xi(t)\odot z\bigr)+\xi(t)\odot\bigl(\xi(t)\odot y-\eta(t)\odot z\bigr)=y, η ( t ) ⊙ ( η ( t ) ⊙ y + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z ) + ξ ( t ) ⊙ ( ξ ( t ) ⊙ y − η ( t ) ⊙ z ) = y ,
so f ( S ( y , z ) ) = χ ( η ( t ) ⊙ y + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z ) ψ ( y ) f(S(y,z))=\chi(\eta(t)\odot y+\xi(t)\odot z)\,\psi(y) f ( S ( y , z )) = χ ( η ( t ) ⊙ y + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z ) ψ ( y ) . Taking the factors ψ ( y ) \psi(y) ψ ( y ) , respectively χ ( y ) \chi(y) χ ( y ) , out of the inner integrals (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable ), Step 7(b) gives
∫ ψ χ t d γ n = ∫ ( ∫ f ( S ( y , z ) ) γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) = ∫ ( ∫ f ( y , z ) γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) = ∫ χ ψ t d γ n . \int\psi\,\chi_{t}\,d\gamma_{n}=\int\Bigl(\int f(S(y,z))\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)=\int\Bigl(\int f(y,z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)=\int\chi\,\psi_{t}\,d\gamma_{n}. ∫ ψ χ t d γ n = ∫ ( ∫ f ( S ( y , z )) γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) = ∫ ( ∫ f ( y , z ) γ n ( d z ) ) γ n ( d y ) = ∫ χ ψ t d γ n .
Claim 8. Let α ∈ A \alpha\in\mathcal{A} α ∈ A have length bound n n n (Finitely Supported Multi-Indices: Order, Factorial, Powers and Weighted Order §multi-indices ). By claim 1, ( n , h α , M , ∣ α ∣ ) (n,h_{\alpha},M,|\alpha|) ( n , h α , M , ∣ α ∣ ) represents H α H_{\alpha} H α , where h α ( y ) = ∏ k = 1 n H α k c k ( y k ) h_{\alpha}(y)=\prod_{k=1}^{n}H^{c_{k}}_{\alpha_{k}}(y_{k}) h α ( y ) = ∏ k = 1 n H α k c k ( y k ) , so P t H α = ( h α ) t ∘ p n P_{t}H_{\alpha}=(h_{\alpha})_{t}\circ p_{n} P t H α = ( h α ) t ∘ p n by claim 2. Fix u ∈ R n u\in\mathbb{R}^{n} u ∈ R n and put g k ( τ ) = H α k c k ( η k ( t ) u k + ξ k ( t ) τ ) g_{k}(\tau)=H^{c_{k}}_{\alpha_{k}}(\eta_{k}(t)u_{k}+\xi_{k}(t)\tau) g k ( τ ) = H α k c k ( η k ( t ) u k + ξ k ( t ) τ ) for τ ∈ R \tau\in\mathbb{R} τ ∈ R and k ∈ [ n ] k\in[n] k ∈ [ n ] . Since c k > 0 c_{k}>0 c k > 0 and η k ( t ) 2 + ξ k ( t ) 2 = 1 \eta_{k}(t)^{2}+\xi_{k}(t)^{2}=1 η k ( t ) 2 + ξ k ( t ) 2 = 1 , Hermite Polynomials: Low Orders, Derivatives, Recursion, Scaling, the Addition Formula, Gaussian Orthogonality and the Mehler Identity §mehler , applied with v = c k v=c_{k} v = c k , r = η k ( t ) r=\eta_{k}(t) r = η k ( t ) , s = ξ k ( t ) s=\xi_{k}(t) s = ξ k ( t ) and u k u_{k} u k in place of the number written t t t there, shows that g k g_{k} g k is Borel and γ ( c k ) \gamma_{(c_{k})} γ ( c k ) -integrable (so ∫ ∣ g k ∣ d γ ( c k ) < ∞ \int|g_{k}|\,d\gamma_{(c_{k})}<\infty ∫ ∣ g k ∣ d γ ( c k ) < ∞ by Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral ) with ∫ g k d γ ( c k ) = η k ( t ) α k H α k c k ( u k ) \int g_{k}\,d\gamma_{(c_{k})}=\eta_{k}(t)^{\alpha_{k}}H^{c_{k}}_{\alpha_{k}}(u_{k}) ∫ g k d γ ( c k ) = η k ( t ) α k H α k c k ( u k ) . The integrand of ( h α ) t ( u ) (h_{\alpha})_{t}(u) ( h α ) t ( u ) is z ↦ ∏ k g k ( z k ) z\mapsto\prod_{k}g_{k}(z_{k}) z ↦ ∏ k g k ( z k ) , so Step 8 gives
( h α ) t ( u ) = ∏ k = 1 n η k ( t ) α k H α k c k ( u k ) = exp ( − t ∑ k = 1 n α k θ k ) h α ( u ) = exp ( − t θ ⋅ α ) h α ( u ) , (h_{\alpha})_{t}(u)=\prod_{k=1}^{n}\eta_{k}(t)^{\alpha_{k}}H^{c_{k}}_{\alpha_{k}}(u_{k})=\exp\Bigl(-t\sum_{k=1}^{n}\alpha_{k}\theta_{k}\Bigr)h_{\alpha}(u)=\exp(-t\,\theta\cdot\alpha)\,h_{\alpha}(u), ( h α ) t ( u ) = k = 1 ∏ n η k ( t ) α k H α k c k ( u k ) = exp ( − t k = 1 ∑ n α k θ k ) h α ( u ) = exp ( − t θ ⋅ α ) h α ( u ) ,
using η k ( t ) α k = exp ( − α k θ k t ) \eta_{k}(t)^{\alpha_{k}}=\exp(-\alpha_{k}\theta_{k}t) η k ( t ) α k = exp ( − α k θ k t ) and ∏ k exp ( b k ) = exp ( ∑ k b k ) \prod_{k}\exp(b_{k})=\exp(\sum_{k}b_{k}) ∏ k exp ( b k ) = exp ( ∑ k b k ) , both from claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function (with exp ( b ) 0 = 1 = exp ( 0 ) \exp(b)^{0}=1=\exp(0) exp ( b ) 0 = 1 = exp ( 0 ) ), and Finitely Supported Multi-Indices: Order, Factorial, Powers and Weighted Order §order with the sequence θ \theta θ . Hence P t H α = exp ( − t θ ⋅ α ) h α ∘ p n = exp ( − t θ ⋅ α ) H α P_{t}H_{\alpha}=\exp(-t\,\theta\cdot\alpha)\,h_{\alpha}\circ p_{n}=\exp(-t\,\theta\cdot\alpha)\,H_{\alpha} P t H α = exp ( − t θ ⋅ α ) h α ∘ p n = exp ( − t θ ⋅ α ) H α .
Claim 9. Let F ∈ F C b 1 ( X ) F\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) F ∈ F C b 1 ( X ) have representation ( n , ψ ) (n,\psi) ( n , ψ ) , ψ ∈ C b 1 ( R n ) \psi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) ψ ∈ C b 1 ( R n ) , and let C 0 , C 1 C_{0},C_{1} C 0 , C 1 bound ∣ ψ ∣ |\psi| ∣ ψ ∣ and the ∣ ∂ k ψ ∣ |\partial_{k}\psi| ∣ ∂ k ψ ∣ , k ∈ [ n ] k\in[n] k ∈ [ n ] . By claim 1, ( n , ψ , C 0 , 0 ) (n,\psi,C_{0},0) ( n , ψ , C 0 , 0 ) represents F F F , so P t F = ψ t ∘ p n P_{t}F=\psi_{t}\circ p_{n} P t F = ψ t ∘ p n by claim 2, and ψ t ∈ C b 1 ( R n ) \psi_{t}\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) ψ t ∈ C b 1 ( R n ) by Step 11; hence P t F ∈ F C b 1 ( X ) P_{t}F\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) P t F ∈ F C b 1 ( X ) by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical , with representation ( n , ψ t ) (n,\psi_{t}) ( n , ψ t ) . Let k ∈ N k\in\mathbb{N} k ∈ N . If k ≤ n k\le n k ≤ n , Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial gives ∂ k F = ( ∂ k ψ ) ∘ p n \partial_{k}F=(\partial_{k}\psi)\circ p_{n} ∂ k F = ( ∂ k ψ ) ∘ p n , where ∂ k ψ \partial_{k}\psi ∂ k ψ is of polynomial growth with constants ( C 1 , 0 ) (C_{1},0) ( C 1 , 0 ) (Step 11); so ∂ k F ∈ F C p o l ( X ) \partial_{k}F\in\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) ∂ k F ∈ F C pol ( X ) and P t ( ∂ k F ) = ( ∂ k ψ ) t ∘ p n P_{t}(\partial_{k}F)=(\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}\circ p_{n} P t ( ∂ k F ) = ( ∂ k ψ ) t ∘ p n by claim 2. Applying Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial to P t F P_{t}F P t F with representation ( n , ψ t ) (n,\psi_{t}) ( n , ψ t ) , and Step 11,
∂ k ( P t F ) = ( ∂ k ψ t ) ∘ p n = η k ( t ) ( ∂ k ψ ) t ∘ p n = exp ( − θ k t ) P t ( ∂ k F ) . \partial_{k}(P_{t}F)=(\partial_{k}\psi_{t})\circ p_{n}=\eta_{k}(t)\,(\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}\circ p_{n}=\exp(-\theta_{k}t)\,P_{t}(\partial_{k}F). ∂ k ( P t F ) = ( ∂ k ψ t ) ∘ p n = η k ( t ) ( ∂ k ψ ) t ∘ p n = exp ( − θ k t ) P t ( ∂ k F ) .
If k > n k>n k > n , the same lemma gives ∂ k F = 0 \partial_{k}F=0 ∂ k F = 0 and ∂ k ( P t F ) = 0 \partial_{k}(P_{t}F)=0 ∂ k ( P t F ) = 0 ; the constant 0 0 0 lies in F C p o l ( X ) \mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) F C pol ( X ) and P t 0 = 0 P_{t}0=0 P t 0 = 0 by claims 1 and 2, so both sides of the identity vanish.
Claim 10. Let t > 0 t>0 t > 0 , let F F F be bounded, and let ( n , ψ , B , q ) (n,\psi,B,q) ( n , ψ , B , q ) represent F F F . For u ∈ R n u\in\mathbb{R}^{n} u ∈ R n the point p n ∗ ( u ) = ∑ k = 1 n u k e k p_{n}^{*}(u)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}u_{k}e_{k} p n ∗ ( u ) = ∑ k = 1 n u k e k of Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates satisfies p n ( p n ∗ ( u ) ) = u p_{n}(p_{n}^{*}(u))=u p n ( p n ∗ ( u )) = u , by linearity of the inner product and orthonormality of ( e k ) (e_{k}) ( e k ) (Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §space ); so ψ ( u ) = F ( p n ∗ ( u ) ) \psi(u)=F(p_{n}^{*}(u)) ψ ( u ) = F ( p n ∗ ( u )) , and ∣ ψ ∣ ≤ M 0 |\psi|\le M_{0} ∣ ψ ∣ ≤ M 0 for some real M 0 ≥ 0 M_{0}\ge0 M 0 ≥ 0 .
Standardisation. For 0 < s ≤ 1 0<s\le1 0 < s ≤ 1 let g s g_{s} g s be the Gaussian weight of The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails , read with n n n in place of the dimension written q q q there, so g 1 ( w ) = ϰ exp ( − ∥ w ∥ 2 / 2 ) g_{1}(w)=\varkappa\exp(-\lVert w\rVert^{2}/2) g 1 ( w ) = ϰ exp ( − ∥ w ∥ 2 /2 ) , where ϰ \varkappa ϰ is the unique positive real number with ∫ g 1 d w = 1 \int g_{1}\,dw=1 ∫ g 1 d w = 1 (written c 1 c_{1} c 1 there). Let ς = ( c 1 , … , c n ) \varsigma=(\sqrt{c_{1}},\dots,\sqrt{c_{n}}) ς = ( c 1 , … , c n ) and β 0 = ∏ k c k \beta_{0}=\prod_{k}\sqrt{c_{k}} β 0 = ∏ k c k . Since ( c k w k ) 2 / c k = w k 2 (\sqrt{c_{k}}\,w_{k})^{2}/c_{k}=w_{k}^{2} ( c k w k ) 2 / c k = w k 2 , The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §density , Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n §square and claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function give β 0 ρ n ( ς ⊙ w ) = C exp ( − ∥ w ∥ 2 / 2 ) \beta_{0}\rho_{n}(\varsigma\odot w)=C\exp(-\lVert w\rVert^{2}/2) β 0 ρ n ( ς ⊙ w ) = C exp ( − ∥ w ∥ 2 /2 ) for a real C > 0 C>0 C > 0 independent of w w w . By the density rule and Step 5 (with a = 0 \mathbf{a}=0 a = 0 , b = ς \mathbf{b}=\varsigma b = ς ), for every Borel ϕ : R n → [ 0 , ∞ ) \phi:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to[0,\infty) ϕ : R n → [ 0 , ∞ ) ,
∫ ϕ d γ n = ∫ ϕ ρ n d z = ∫ ϕ ( ς ⊙ w ) C exp ( − ∥ w ∥ 2 / 2 ) d w . \int\phi\,d\gamma_{n}=\int\phi\rho_{n}\,dz=\int\phi(\varsigma\odot w)\,C\exp(-\lVert w\rVert^{2}/2)\,dw . ∫ ϕ d γ n = ∫ ϕ ρ n d z = ∫ ϕ ( ς ⊙ w ) C exp ( − ∥ w ∥ 2 /2 ) d w .
With ϕ = 1 \phi=1 ϕ = 1 the left side is 1 1 1 , so C = ϰ C=\varkappa C = ϰ by the uniqueness just quoted; hence ∫ ϕ d γ n = ∫ ϕ ( ς ⊙ w ) g 1 ( w ) d w \int\phi\,d\gamma_{n}=\int\phi(\varsigma\odot w)g_{1}(w)\,dw ∫ ϕ d γ n = ∫ ϕ ( ς ⊙ w ) g 1 ( w ) d w , and, splitting ϕ = ϕ + − ϕ − \phi=\phi^{+}-\phi^{-} ϕ = ϕ + − ϕ − (Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral , Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable ), the same holds for every γ n \gamma_{n} γ n -integrable Borel ϕ \phi ϕ , the right-hand integrand being then λ n \lambda_{n} λ n -integrable. (10.1)
Reduction to a Gaussian smoothing. Let D = ξ ( t ) ⊙ ς D=\xi(t)\odot\varsigma D = ξ ( t ) ⊙ ς , whose entries are positive by Step 6(v), E = D − 1 ⊙ η ( t ) E=D^{-1}\odot\eta(t) E = D − 1 ⊙ η ( t ) , and H ( v ) = ψ ( D ⊙ v ) H(v)=\psi(D\odot v) H ( v ) = ψ ( D ⊙ v ) , a continuous, hence Borel, function with ∣ H ∣ ≤ M 0 |H|\le M_{0} ∣ H ∣ ≤ M 0 . For u , w ∈ R n u,w\in\mathbb{R}^{n} u , w ∈ R n , η ( t ) ⊙ u + ξ ( t ) ⊙ ς ⊙ w = D ⊙ ( E ⊙ u + w ) \eta(t)\odot u+\xi(t)\odot\varsigma\odot w=D\odot(E\odot u+w) η ( t ) ⊙ u + ξ ( t ) ⊙ ς ⊙ w = D ⊙ ( E ⊙ u + w ) , so by (10.1)
ψ t ( u ) = ∫ H ( E ⊙ u + w ) g 1 ( w ) d w = ∫ H ( E ⊙ u − x ) g 1 ( x ) d x = H 1 ( E ⊙ u ) , \psi_{t}(u)=\int H(E\odot u+w)\,g_{1}(w)\,dw=\int H(E\odot u-x)\,g_{1}(x)\,dx=H_{1}(E\odot u), ψ t ( u ) = ∫ H ( E ⊙ u + w ) g 1 ( w ) d w = ∫ H ( E ⊙ u − x ) g 1 ( x ) d x = H 1 ( E ⊙ u ) ,
where the second equality is claim 3 of Translation and Reflection Invariance of Lebesgue Measure on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n with a = 0 a=0 a = 0 , applied to the integrable function w ↦ H ( E ⊙ u + w ) g 1 ( w ) w\mapsto H(E\odot u+w)g_{1}(w) w ↦ H ( E ⊙ u + w ) g 1 ( w ) , together with g 1 ( − x ) = g 1 ( x ) g_{1}(-x)=g_{1}(x) g 1 ( − x ) = g 1 ( x ) (The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §derivatives ), and H 1 H_{1} H 1 is the smoothing of H H H of Gaussian Smoothing of a Bounded Borel Function on Euclidean Space: the Two Forms, Derivatives through the Kernel and through the Function, and Pointwise Convergence §smoothing with s = 1 s=1 s = 1 .
H 1 ∈ C b 2 ( R n ) H_{1}\in C^{2}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) H 1 ∈ C b 2 ( R n ) . Fix y ∈ R n y\in\mathbb{R}^{n} y ∈ R n . By The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §convolution with s = 1 2 s=\tfrac12 s = 2 1 and the evenness of g 1 / 2 g_{1/2} g 1/2 and g 1 g_{1} g 1 , g 1 ( y − z ) = ∫ g 1 / 2 ( w − y ) g 1 / 2 ( w − z ) d w g_{1}(y-z)=\int g_{1/2}(w-y)\,g_{1/2}(w-z)\,dw g 1 ( y − z ) = ∫ g 1/2 ( w − y ) g 1/2 ( w − z ) d w for every z z z . The functions H + , H − H^{+},H^{-} H + , H − are Borel with values in [ 0 , M 0 ] [0,M_{0}] [ 0 , M 0 ] . Applying Tonelli and Fubini Theorems for λ n ⊗ λ n \lambda_{n}\otimes\lambda_{n} λ n ⊗ λ n to the nonnegative measurable function ( z , w ) ↦ g 1 / 2 ( w − y ) g 1 / 2 ( w − z ) H ± ( z ) (z,w)\mapsto g_{1/2}(w-y)\,g_{1/2}(w-z)\,H^{\pm}(z) ( z , w ) ↦ g 1/2 ( w − y ) g 1/2 ( w − z ) H ± ( z ) , with Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative , and then Gaussian Smoothing of a Bounded Borel Function on Euclidean Space: the Two Forms, Derivatives through the Kernel and through the Function, and Pointwise Convergence §smoothing (second form) with s = 1 2 s=\tfrac12 s = 2 1 ,
∫ g 1 ( y − z ) H ± ( z ) d z = ∫ g 1 / 2 ( w − y ) ( ∫ g 1 / 2 ( w − z ) H ± ( z ) d z ) d w = ∫ g 1 / 2 ( y − w ) ( H ± ) 1 / 2 ( w ) d w , \int g_{1}(y-z)\,H^{\pm}(z)\,dz=\int g_{1/2}(w-y)\Bigl(\int g_{1/2}(w-z)\,H^{\pm}(z)\,dz\Bigr)dw=\int g_{1/2}(y-w)\,(H^{\pm})_{1/2}(w)\,dw, ∫ g 1 ( y − z ) H ± ( z ) d z = ∫ g 1/2 ( w − y ) ( ∫ g 1/2 ( w − z ) H ± ( z ) d z ) d w = ∫ g 1/2 ( y − w ) ( H ± ) 1/2 ( w ) d w ,
all these quantities being finite by the same claim (the functions ( H ± ) 1 / 2 (H^{\pm})_{1/2} ( H ± ) 1/2 are bounded by M 0 M_{0} M 0 and Borel, being continuous by Gaussian Smoothing of a Bounded Borel Function on Euclidean Space: the Two Forms, Derivatives through the Kernel and through the Function, and Pointwise Convergence §kernel-derivative ). Subtracting the two identities and using Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable (so that ( H + ) 1 / 2 − ( H − ) 1 / 2 = H 1 / 2 (H^{+})_{1/2}-(H^{-})_{1/2}=H_{1/2} ( H + ) 1/2 − ( H − ) 1/2 = H 1/2 ) gives H 1 ( y ) = ∫ g 1 / 2 ( y − w ) H 1 / 2 ( w ) d w = ( H 1 / 2 ) 1 / 2 ( y ) H_{1}(y)=\int g_{1/2}(y-w)\,H_{1/2}(w)\,dw=(H_{1/2})_{1/2}(y) H 1 ( y ) = ∫ g 1/2 ( y − w ) H 1/2 ( w ) d w = ( H 1/2 ) 1/2 ( y ) , the smoothing with s = 1 2 s=\tfrac12 s = 2 1 of the Borel function H 1 / 2 H_{1/2} H 1/2 , which is bounded by M 0 M_{0} M 0 . By Gaussian Smoothing of a Bounded Borel Function on Euclidean Space: the Two Forms, Derivatives through the Kernel and through the Function, and Pointwise Convergence §kernel-derivative , H 1 / 2 H_{1/2} H 1/2 is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 with ∣ ∂ i H 1 / 2 ∣ ≤ M 0 n 2 |\partial_{i}H_{1/2}|\le M_{0}\sqrt{n}\sqrt{2} ∣ ∂ i H 1/2 ∣ ≤ M 0 n 2 , so H 1 / 2 ∈ C b 1 ( R n ) H_{1/2}\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) H 1/2 ∈ C b 1 ( R n ) . By Gaussian Smoothing of a Bounded Borel Function on Euclidean Space: the Two Forms, Derivatives through the Kernel and through the Function, and Pointwise Convergence §function-derivative , applied with H 1 / 2 H_{1/2} H 1/2 in place of H H H , ∂ i H 1 = ( ∂ i H 1 / 2 ) 1 / 2 \partial_{i}H_{1}=(\partial_{i}H_{1/2})_{1/2} ∂ i H 1 = ( ∂ i H 1/2 ) 1/2 , the smoothing of the bounded Borel function ∂ i H 1 / 2 \partial_{i}H_{1/2} ∂ i H 1/2 ; by Gaussian Smoothing of a Bounded Borel Function on Euclidean Space: the Two Forms, Derivatives through the Kernel and through the Function, and Pointwise Convergence §smoothing and Gaussian Smoothing of a Bounded Borel Function on Euclidean Space: the Two Forms, Derivatives through the Kernel and through the Function, and Pointwise Convergence §kernel-derivative , applied with ∂ i H 1 / 2 \partial_{i}H_{1/2} ∂ i H 1/2 in place of H H H , this function is bounded and of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 with bounded partial derivatives. Since H 1 H_{1} H 1 is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 and bounded (same claims with s = 1 s=1 s = 1 ), clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set shows that H 1 H_{1} H 1 is of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 , and H 1 ∈ C b 2 ( R n ) H_{1}\in C^{2}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) H 1 ∈ C b 2 ( R n ) by Bounded Twice Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded First and Second Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded .
Conclusion. Since ψ t ( u ) = H 1 ( E ⊙ u ) \psi_{t}(u)=H_{1}(E\odot u) ψ t ( u ) = H 1 ( E ⊙ u ) , Step 4 (with a = 0 \mathbf{a}=0 a = 0 , b = E \mathbf{b}=E b = E ) shows that ψ t \psi_{t} ψ t is of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 with ∂ k ψ t ( u ) = E k ∂ k H 1 ( E ⊙ u ) \partial_{k}\psi_{t}(u)=E_{k}\partial_{k}H_{1}(E\odot u) ∂ k ψ t ( u ) = E k ∂ k H 1 ( E ⊙ u ) and ∂ l ∂ k ψ t ( u ) = E l E k ∂ l ∂ k H 1 ( E ⊙ u ) \partial_{l}\partial_{k}\psi_{t}(u)=E_{l}E_{k}\partial_{l}\partial_{k}H_{1}(E\odot u) ∂ l ∂ k ψ t ( u ) = E l E k ∂ l ∂ k H 1 ( E ⊙ u ) , all bounded; so ψ t ∈ C b 2 ( R n ) \psi_{t}\in C^{2}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) ψ t ∈ C b 2 ( R n ) , and P t F = ψ t ∘ p n ∈ F C b 2 ( X ) P_{t}F=\psi_{t}\circ p_{n}\in\mathcal{F}C^{2}_{b}(X) P t F = ψ t ∘ p n ∈ F C b 2 ( X ) by claim 2 and Bounded C^2 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical .
Claim 11. Let ( n , ψ , B , q ) (n,\psi,B,q) ( n , ψ , B , q ) represent F F F , let x ∈ X x\in X x ∈ X and u = p n ( x ) u=p_{n}(x) u = p n ( x ) . By claim 2, P r F ( x ) = ψ r ( u ) P_{r}F(x)=\psi_{r}(u) P r F ( x ) = ψ r ( u ) for every real r ≥ 0 r\ge0 r ≥ 0 , and r ↦ ψ r ( u ) r\mapsto\psi_{r}(u) r ↦ ψ r ( u ) is continuous on [ 0 , ∞ ) [0,\infty) [ 0 , ∞ ) by (9.3); this is the first assertion. Let p ≥ 1 p\ge1 p ≥ 1 be real, m ∈ N m\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N with p ≤ m p\le m p ≤ m , and let ( r m ′ ) m ′ ∈ N (r_{m'})_{m'\in\mathbb{N}} ( r m ′ ) m ′ ∈ N be a sequence in [ 0 , ∞ ) [0,\infty) [ 0 , ∞ ) converging to t t t . The functions f m ′ = ∣ P r m ′ F − P t F ∣ p f_{m'}=|P_{r_{m'}}F-P_{t}F|^{p} f m ′ = ∣ P r m ′ F − P t F ∣ p on X X X are measurable (Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §measurable-power ) and converge to 0 0 0 at every point, by the first assertion and Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §continuity . By claim 2, ∣ P r m ′ F ( x ′ ) − P t F ( x ′ ) ∣ ≤ 2 B ′ ( 1 + ∥ p n x ′ ∥ q ) ≤ 4 B ′ ( 1 + ∣ x ′ ∣ 2 ) q |P_{r_{m'}}F(x')-P_{t}F(x')|\le2B'(1+\lVert p_{n}x'\rVert^{q})\le4B'(1+|x'|^{2})^{q} ∣ P r m ′ F ( x ′ ) − P t F ( x ′ ) ∣ ≤ 2 B ′ ( 1 + ∥ p n x ′ ∥ q ) ≤ 4 B ′ ( 1 + ∣ x ′ ∣ 2 ) q for x ′ ∈ X x'\in X x ′ ∈ X , using (E2); so, as in claim 1, f m ′ ( x ′ ) ≤ 2 ( 4 B ′ ) p ( 1 + ∣ x ′ ∣ 2 ) q m f_{m'}(x')\le2(4B')^{p}(1+|x'|^{2})^{qm} f m ′ ( x ′ ) ≤ 2 ( 4 B ′ ) p ( 1 + ∣ x ′ ∣ 2 ) q m , which is γ c \gamma_{c} γ c -integrable by Step 2. By Dominated Convergence Theorem , ∫ X f m ′ d γ c → 0 \int_{X}f_{m'}\,d\gamma_{c}\to0 ∫ X f m ′ d γ c → 0 . Now suppose that ∥ P r F − P t F ∥ p \lVert P_{r}F-P_{t}F\rVert_{p} ∥ P r F − P t F ∥ p did not tend to 0 0 0 as r → t r\to t r → t over r ≥ 0 r\ge0 r ≥ 0 , the difference belonging to L p ( γ c ) L^{p}(\gamma_{c}) L p ( γ c ) by claims 1 and 2. Then there would be ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 and, for each m ′ ∈ N m'\in\mathbb{N} m ′ ∈ N , a real r m ′ ≥ 0 r_{m'}\ge0 r m ′ ≥ 0 with ∣ r m ′ − t ∣ < 1 / m ′ |r_{m'}-t|<1/m' ∣ r m ′ − t ∣ < 1/ m ′ and ∥ P r m ′ F − P t F ∥ p ≥ ε \lVert P_{r_{m'}}F-P_{t}F\rVert_{p}\ge\varepsilon ∥ P r m ′ F − P t F ∥ p ≥ ε , that is, ∫ X f m ′ d γ c ≥ ε p \int_{X}f_{m'}\,d\gamma_{c}\ge\varepsilon^{p} ∫ X f m ′ d γ c ≥ ε p by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §seminorm , Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone and Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §inverse ; since r m ′ → t r_{m'}\to t r m ′ → t , this contradicts what was just shown.
Claim 12. Let F ∈ F C b 2 ( X ) F\in\mathcal{F}C^{2}_{b}(X) F ∈ F C b 2 ( X ) , F = ψ ∘ p n F=\psi\circ p_{n} F = ψ ∘ p n with ψ ∈ C b 2 ( R n ) \psi\in C^{2}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) ψ ∈ C b 2 ( R n ) (Bounded C^2 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical ), and let M 0 , M 1 , M 2 ≥ 0 M_{0},M_{1},M_{2}\ge0 M 0 , M 1 , M 2 ≥ 0 be real bounds of ∣ ψ ∣ |\psi| ∣ ψ ∣ , of the ∣ ∂ k ψ ∣ |\partial_{k}\psi| ∣ ∂ k ψ ∣ and of the ∣ ∂ l ∂ k ψ ∣ |\partial_{l}\partial_{k}\psi| ∣ ∂ l ∂ k ψ ∣ (k , l ∈ [ n ] k,l\in[n] k , l ∈ [ n ] ). By clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set , each ∂ k ψ \partial_{k}\psi ∂ k ψ is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 , and it is bounded with bounded partial derivatives, so ∂ k ψ ∈ C b 1 ( R n ) \partial_{k}\psi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) ∂ k ψ ∈ C b 1 ( R n ) ; and ( n , ψ , M 0 , 0 ) (n,\psi,M_{0},0) ( n , ψ , M 0 , 0 ) represents F F F (claim 1).
(a) P t F ∈ F C b 2 ( X ) P_{t}F\in\mathcal{F}C^{2}_{b}(X) P t F ∈ F C b 2 ( X ) . By Step 11 applied to ψ \psi ψ and to each ∂ k ψ \partial_{k}\psi ∂ k ψ , ψ t \psi_{t} ψ t is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 with ∂ k ψ t = η k ( t ) ( ∂ k ψ ) t \partial_{k}\psi_{t}=\eta_{k}(t)(\partial_{k}\psi)_{t} ∂ k ψ t = η k ( t ) ( ∂ k ψ ) t , and ( ∂ k ψ ) t (\partial_{k}\psi)_{t} ( ∂ k ψ ) t is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 with ∂ l ( ∂ k ψ ) t = η l ( t ) ( ∂ l ∂ k ψ ) t \partial_{l}(\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}=\eta_{l}(t)(\partial_{l}\partial_{k}\psi)_{t} ∂ l ( ∂ k ψ ) t = η l ( t ) ( ∂ l ∂ k ψ ) t , these functions being bounded by M 0 M_{0} M 0 , M 1 M_{1} M 1 and M 1 M_{1} M 1 (Step 11), and ∣ ( ∂ l ∂ k ψ ) t ∣ ≤ M 2 |(\partial_{l}\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}|\le M_{2} ∣ ( ∂ l ∂ k ψ ) t ∣ ≤ M 2 by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable . Hence each ∂ k ψ t \partial_{k}\psi_{t} ∂ k ψ t is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 , ψ t \psi_{t} ψ t is of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 by clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set , with
∂ l ∂ k ψ t = η l ( t ) η k ( t ) ( ∂ l ∂ k ψ ) t , ( 12.1 ) \partial_{l}\partial_{k}\psi_{t}=\eta_{l}(t)\eta_{k}(t)\,(\partial_{l}\partial_{k}\psi)_{t},\qquad(12.1) ∂ l ∂ k ψ t = η l ( t ) η k ( t ) ( ∂ l ∂ k ψ ) t , ( 12.1 )
and ψ t ∈ C b 2 ( R n ) \psi_{t}\in C^{2}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) ψ t ∈ C b 2 ( R n ) . Since P t F = ψ t ∘ p n P_{t}F=\psi_{t}\circ p_{n} P t F = ψ t ∘ p n (claim 2), P t F ∈ F C b 2 ( X ) P_{t}F\in\mathcal{F}C^{2}_{b}(X) P t F ∈ F C b 2 ( X ) .
(b) The operator in cylindrical form. For φ ∈ C b 2 ( R n ) \varphi\in C^{2}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) φ ∈ C b 2 ( R n ) put Λ φ ( v ) = ∑ k = 1 n a k ( ∂ k ∂ k φ ( v ) − c k − 1 v k ∂ k φ ( v ) ) \Lambda\varphi(v)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\bigl(\partial_{k}\partial_{k}\varphi(v)-c_{k}^{-1}v_{k}\,\partial_{k}\varphi(v)\bigr) Λ φ ( v ) = ∑ k = 1 n a k ( ∂ k ∂ k φ ( v ) − c k − 1 v k ∂ k φ ( v ) ) . Then L a ( φ ∘ p n ) = ( Λ φ ) ∘ p n L^{a}(\varphi\circ p_{n})=(\Lambda\varphi)\circ p_{n} L a ( φ ∘ p n ) = ( Λ φ ) ∘ p n : for k ≤ n k\le n k ≤ n , Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial gives ∂ k ( φ ∘ p n ) = ( ∂ k φ ) ∘ p n \partial_{k}(\varphi\circ p_{n})=(\partial_{k}\varphi)\circ p_{n} ∂ k ( φ ∘ p n ) = ( ∂ k φ ) ∘ p n , which belongs to F C b 1 ( X ) \mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) F C b 1 ( X ) with representation ( n , ∂ k φ ) (n,\partial_{k}\varphi) ( n , ∂ k φ ) by The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Operator with Noise Weights on Bounded C^2 Cylindrical Functions §second-derivatives , so the same lemma gives ∂ k ∂ k ( φ ∘ p n ) = ( ∂ k ∂ k φ ) ∘ p n \partial_{k}\partial_{k}(\varphi\circ p_{n})=(\partial_{k}\partial_{k}\varphi)\circ p_{n} ∂ k ∂ k ( φ ∘ p n ) = ( ∂ k ∂ k φ ) ∘ p n ; since x k x_{k} x k is the k k k -th entry of p n ( x ) p_{n}(x) p n ( x ) , The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Operator with Noise Weights on Bounded C^2 Cylindrical Functions §operator (with the pair ( n , φ ) (n,\varphi) ( n , φ ) ) gives the formula. The function Λ ψ \Lambda\psi Λ ψ is continuous, and by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n §coordinate , ∣ Λ ψ ( v ) ∣ ≤ C Λ ( 1 + ∥ v ∥ ) |\Lambda\psi(v)|\le C_{\Lambda}(1+\lVert v\rVert) ∣Λ ψ ( v ) ∣ ≤ C Λ ( 1 + ∥ v ∥) with C Λ = ∑ k a k ( M 2 + c k − 1 M 1 ) C_{\Lambda}=\sum_{k}a_{k}(M_{2}+c_{k}^{-1}M_{1}) C Λ = ∑ k a k ( M 2 + c k − 1 M 1 ) . So ( n , Λ ψ , C Λ , 1 ) (n,\Lambda\psi,C_{\Lambda},1) ( n , Λ ψ , C Λ , 1 ) represents L a F = ( Λ ψ ) ∘ p n L^{a}F=(\Lambda\psi)\circ p_{n} L a F = ( Λ ψ ) ∘ p n ; thus L a F ∈ F C p o l ( X ) L^{a}F\in\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) L a F ∈ F C pol ( X ) , P t ( L a F ) = ( Λ ψ ) t ∘ p n P_{t}(L^{a}F)=(\Lambda\psi)_{t}\circ p_{n} P t ( L a F ) = ( Λ ψ ) t ∘ p n by claim 2, and L a ( P t F ) = ( Λ ψ t ) ∘ p n L^{a}(P_{t}F)=(\Lambda\psi_{t})\circ p_{n} L a ( P t F ) = ( Λ ψ t ) ∘ p n by (a).
(c) Commutation. Fix u ∈ R n u\in\mathbb{R}^{n} u ∈ R n , write η k = η k ( t ) \eta_{k}=\eta_{k}(t) η k = η k ( t ) , ξ k = ξ k ( t ) \xi_{k}=\xi_{k}(t) ξ k = ξ k ( t ) and w ( z ) = η ( t ) ⊙ u + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z w(z)=\eta(t)\odot u+\xi(t)\odot z w ( z ) = η ( t ) ⊙ u + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z . For k ∈ [ n ] k\in[n] k ∈ [ n ] let f k ( z ) = ∂ k ψ ( w ( z ) ) f_{k}(z)=\partial_{k}\psi(w(z)) f k ( z ) = ∂ k ψ ( w ( z )) ; by Step 4, f k f_{k} f k is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 with ∂ i f k ( z ) = ξ i ∂ i ∂ k ψ ( w ( z ) ) \partial_{i}f_{k}(z)=\xi_{i}\,\partial_{i}\partial_{k}\psi(w(z)) ∂ i f k ( z ) = ξ i ∂ i ∂ k ψ ( w ( z )) , so ∣ ∂ i f k ( z ) ∣ ≤ M 2 ≤ M 2 ( 1 + ∥ z ∥ ) |\partial_{i}f_{k}(z)|\le M_{2}\le M_{2}(1+\lVert z\rVert) ∣ ∂ i f k ( z ) ∣ ≤ M 2 ≤ M 2 ( 1 + ∥ z ∥) . Hence Gaussian Integration by Parts for Functions of Finitely Many Coordinates Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §coordinate , applied with f k f_{k} f k in place of ψ \psi ψ and i = k i=k i = k , together with the transfer rule of Step 2 (the k k k -th entry of p n ( x ) p_{n}(x) p n ( x ) being x k x_{k} x k ), gives
∫ z k f k ( z ) γ n ( d z ) = c k ∫ ∂ k f k d γ n = c k ξ k ( ∂ k ∂ k ψ ) t ( u ) . \int z_{k}\,f_{k}(z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=c_{k}\int\partial_{k}f_{k}\,d\gamma_{n}=c_{k}\,\xi_{k}\,(\partial_{k}\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}(u). ∫ z k f k ( z ) γ n ( d z ) = c k ∫ ∂ k f k d γ n = c k ξ k ( ∂ k ∂ k ψ ) t ( u ) .
The k k k -th entry of w ( z ) w(z) w ( z ) is η k u k + ξ k z k \eta_{k}u_{k}+\xi_{k}z_{k} η k u k + ξ k z k , and the functions z ↦ ∂ k ∂ k ψ ( w ( z ) ) z\mapsto\partial_{k}\partial_{k}\psi(w(z)) z ↦ ∂ k ∂ k ψ ( w ( z )) , f k f_{k} f k and z ↦ z k f k ( z ) z\mapsto z_{k}f_{k}(z) z ↦ z k f k ( z ) are γ n \gamma_{n} γ n -integrable (the first two being bounded, the third bounded by M 1 ∣ z k ∣ M_{1}|z_{k}| M 1 ∣ z k ∣ ; Step 2). So by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable , 1 − ξ k 2 = η k 2 1-\xi_{k}^{2}=\eta_{k}^{2} 1 − ξ k 2 = η k 2 , Step 11 and (12.1),
( Λ ψ ) t ( u ) = ∑ k = 1 n a k ( ( ∂ k ∂ k ψ ) t ( u ) − η k u k c k ( ∂ k ψ ) t ( u ) − ξ k c k ∫ z k f k ( z ) γ n ( d z ) ) = ∑ k = 1 n a k ( η k 2 ( ∂ k ∂ k ψ ) t ( u ) − u k c k η k ( ∂ k ψ ) t ( u ) ) = Λ ψ t ( u ) . (\Lambda\psi)_{t}(u)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\Bigl((\partial_{k}\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}(u)-\frac{\eta_{k}u_{k}}{c_{k}}(\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}(u)-\frac{\xi_{k}}{c_{k}}\int z_{k}f_{k}(z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\Bigl(\eta_{k}^{2}(\partial_{k}\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}(u)-\frac{u_{k}}{c_{k}}\,\eta_{k}(\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}(u)\Bigr)=\Lambda\psi_{t}(u). ( Λ ψ ) t ( u ) = k = 1 ∑ n a k ( ( ∂ k ∂ k ψ ) t ( u ) − c k η k u k ( ∂ k ψ ) t ( u ) − c k ξ k ∫ z k f k ( z ) γ n ( d z ) ) = k = 1 ∑ n a k ( η k 2 ( ∂ k ∂ k ψ ) t ( u ) − c k u k η k ( ∂ k ψ ) t ( u ) ) = Λ ψ t ( u ) .
By (b), L a ( P t F ) = P t ( L a F ) L^{a}(P_{t}F)=P_{t}(L^{a}F) L a ( P t F ) = P t ( L a F ) .
(d) An expansion. Write Θ = Θ n \Theta=\Theta_{n} Θ = Θ n . For real h h h with 0 < h ≤ 1 0<h\le1 0 < h ≤ 1 and v , z ∈ R n v,z\in\mathbb{R}^{n} v , z ∈ R n put d h ( v , z ) = ( η ( h ) − 1 ) ⊙ v + ξ ( h ) ⊙ z d_{h}(v,z)=(\eta(h)-\mathbf{1})\odot v+\xi(h)\odot z d h ( v , z ) = ( η ( h ) − 1 ) ⊙ v + ξ ( h ) ⊙ z , so that η ( h ) ⊙ v + ξ ( h ) ⊙ z = v + d h ( v , z ) \eta(h)\odot v+\xi(h)\odot z=v+d_{h}(v,z) η ( h ) ⊙ v + ξ ( h ) ⊙ z = v + d h ( v , z ) . By Step 6(iii), ∣ η k ( h ) − 1 ∣ ≤ Θ h |\eta_{k}(h)-1|\le\Theta h ∣ η k ( h ) − 1∣ ≤ Θ h and ξ k ( h ) 2 ≤ 2 Θ h \xi_{k}(h)^{2}\le2\Theta h ξ k ( h ) 2 ≤ 2Θ h , so by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n §square and claim 5 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities
∥ d h ( v , z ) ∥ 2 ≤ 2 Θ 2 h 2 ∥ v ∥ 2 + 4 Θ h ∥ z ∥ 2 . ( 12.2 ) \lVert d_{h}(v,z)\rVert^{2}\le2\Theta^{2}h^{2}\lVert v\rVert^{2}+4\Theta h\lVert z\rVert^{2}.\qquad(12.2) ∥ d h ( v , z ) ∥ 2 ≤ 2 Θ 2 h 2 ∥ v ∥ 2 + 4Θ h ∥ z ∥ 2 . ( 12.2 )
As γ n \gamma_{n} γ n is a probability measure, ψ h ( v ) − ψ ( v ) = ∫ ( ψ ( v + d h ( v , z ) ) − ψ ( v ) ) γ n ( d z ) \psi_{h}(v)-\psi(v)=\int\bigl(\psi(v+d_{h}(v,z))-\psi(v)\bigr)\gamma_{n}(dz) ψ h ( v ) − ψ ( v ) = ∫ ( ψ ( v + d h ( v , z )) − ψ ( v ) ) γ n ( d z ) . With d = d h ( v , z ) d=d_{h}(v,z) d = d h ( v , z ) define
R h ( v , z ) = ψ ( v + d ) − ψ ( v ) − ∑ i = 1 n ∂ i ψ ( v ) d i − 1 2 ∑ i , j = 1 n ∂ j ∂ i ψ ( v ) d i d j . R_{h}(v,z)=\psi(v+d)-\psi(v)-\sum_{i=1}^{n}\partial_{i}\psi(v)\,d_{i}-\frac12\sum_{i,j=1}^{n}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi(v)\,d_{i}d_{j}. R h ( v , z ) = ψ ( v + d ) − ψ ( v ) − i = 1 ∑ n ∂ i ψ ( v ) d i − 2 1 i , j = 1 ∑ n ∂ j ∂ i ψ ( v ) d i d j .
By Step 2, ∫ d i γ n ( d z ) = ( η i ( h ) − 1 ) v i \int d_{i}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=(\eta_{i}(h)-1)v_{i} ∫ d i γ n ( d z ) = ( η i ( h ) − 1 ) v i and ∫ d i d j γ n ( d z ) = ( η i ( h ) − 1 ) ( η j ( h ) − 1 ) v i v j + ϵ i j ξ i ( h ) 2 c i \int d_{i}d_{j}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=(\eta_{i}(h)-1)(\eta_{j}(h)-1)v_{i}v_{j}+\epsilon_{ij}\xi_{i}(h)^{2}c_{i} ∫ d i d j γ n ( d z ) = ( η i ( h ) − 1 ) ( η j ( h ) − 1 ) v i v j + ϵ ij ξ i ( h ) 2 c i , where ϵ i j = 1 \epsilon_{ij}=1 ϵ ij = 1 if i = j i=j i = j and 0 0 0 otherwise. Hence, R h ( v , ⋅ ) R_{h}(v,\cdot) R h ( v , ⋅ ) being integrable as a combination of integrable functions,
ψ h ( v ) − ψ ( v ) h = ∑ i η i ( h ) − 1 h v i ∂ i ψ ( v ) + 1 2 ∑ i , j ( η i ( h ) − 1 ) ( η j ( h ) − 1 ) h v i v j ∂ j ∂ i ψ ( v ) + 1 2 ∑ i ξ i ( h ) 2 h c i ∂ i ∂ i ψ ( v ) + 1 h ∫ R h ( v , z ) γ n ( d z ) . ( 12.3 ) \frac{\psi_{h}(v)-\psi(v)}{h}=\sum_{i}\frac{\eta_{i}(h)-1}{h}\,v_{i}\,\partial_{i}\psi(v)+\frac12\sum_{i,j}\frac{(\eta_{i}(h)-1)(\eta_{j}(h)-1)}{h}\,v_{i}v_{j}\,\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi(v)+\frac12\sum_{i}\frac{\xi_{i}(h)^{2}}{h}\,c_{i}\,\partial_{i}\partial_{i}\psi(v)+\frac1h\int R_{h}(v,z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz).\qquad(12.3) h ψ h ( v ) − ψ ( v ) = i ∑ h η i ( h ) − 1 v i ∂ i ψ ( v ) + 2 1 i , j ∑ h ( η i ( h ) − 1 ) ( η j ( h ) − 1 ) v i v j ∂ j ∂ i ψ ( v ) + 2 1 i ∑ h ξ i ( h ) 2 c i ∂ i ∂ i ψ ( v ) + h 1 ∫ R h ( v , z ) γ n ( d z ) . ( 12.3 )
By Multivariate Taylor Expansion with Uniform Second-Order Remainder , part (iii) with ε ˉ = 2 M 2 \bar{\varepsilon}=2M_{2} ε ˉ = 2 M 2 (the segment lying in W = R n W=\mathbb{R}^{n} W = R n ),
∣ R h ( v , z ) ∣ ≤ n M 2 ∥ d h ( v , z ) ∥ 2 , ( 12.4 ) |R_{h}(v,z)|\le n\,M_{2}\,\lVert d_{h}(v,z)\rVert^{2},\qquad(12.4) ∣ R h ( v , z ) ∣ ≤ n M 2 ∥ d h ( v , z ) ∥ 2 , ( 12.4 )
and by part (ii), integrated with Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable , (12.2) and Step 2, ∣ ψ h ( v ) − ψ ( v ) − ∑ i ( η i ( h ) − 1 ) v i ∂ i ψ ( v ) ∣ ≤ 1 2 n M 2 ( 2 Θ 2 h 2 ∥ v ∥ 2 + 4 Θ h K 1 ) \bigl|\psi_{h}(v)-\psi(v)-\sum_{i}(\eta_{i}(h)-1)v_{i}\partial_{i}\psi(v)\bigr|\le\frac12nM_{2}(2\Theta^{2}h^{2}\lVert v\rVert^{2}+4\Theta hK_{1}) ψ h ( v ) − ψ ( v ) − ∑ i ( η i ( h ) − 1 ) v i ∂ i ψ ( v ) ≤ 2 1 n M 2 ( 2 Θ 2 h 2 ∥ v ∥ 2 + 4Θ h K 1 ) ; with ∣ v i ∣ ≤ ∥ v ∥ ≤ 1 + ∥ v ∥ 2 |v_{i}|\le\lVert v\rVert\le1+\lVert v\rVert^{2} ∣ v i ∣ ≤ ∥ v ∥ ≤ 1 + ∥ v ∥ 2 and h ≤ 1 h\le1 h ≤ 1 this gives
∣ ψ h ( v ) − ψ ( v ) ∣ ≤ C ∗ h ( 1 + ∥ v ∥ 2 ) , C ∗ = n Θ M 1 + n M 2 Θ 2 + 2 n M 2 Θ K 1 . ( 12.5 ) |\psi_{h}(v)-\psi(v)|\le C_{*}\,h\,(1+\lVert v\rVert^{2}),\qquad C_{*}=n\Theta M_{1}+nM_{2}\Theta^{2}+2nM_{2}\Theta K_{1}.\qquad(12.5) ∣ ψ h ( v ) − ψ ( v ) ∣ ≤ C ∗ h ( 1 + ∥ v ∥ 2 ) , C ∗ = n Θ M 1 + n M 2 Θ 2 + 2 n M 2 Θ K 1 . ( 12.5 )
(e) Convergence of difference quotients. Let ( h m ) (h_{m}) ( h m ) be a sequence in ( 0 , 1 ] (0,1] ( 0 , 1 ] converging to 0 0 0 and ( v m ) (v_{m}) ( v m ) a sequence in R n \mathbb{R}^{n} R n converging to v v v . Then ( ψ h m ( v m ) − ψ ( v m ) ) / h m → Λ ψ ( v ) (\psi_{h_{m}}(v_{m})-\psi(v_{m}))/h_{m}\to\Lambda\psi(v) ( ψ h m ( v m ) − ψ ( v m )) / h m → Λ ψ ( v ) . Indeed, use (12.3) with ( h m , v m ) (h_{m},v_{m}) ( h m , v m ) . By Step 6(iii), ( η i ( h m ) − 1 ) / h m → − θ i (\eta_{i}(h_{m})-1)/h_{m}\to-\theta_{i} ( η i ( h m ) − 1 ) / h m → − θ i and ξ i ( h m ) 2 / h m → 2 θ i \xi_{i}(h_{m})^{2}/h_{m}\to2\theta_{i} ξ i ( h m ) 2 / h m → 2 θ i , and ∣ ( η i ( h m ) − 1 ) ( η j ( h m ) − 1 ) ∣ / h m ≤ Θ 2 h m → 0 |(\eta_{i}(h_{m})-1)(\eta_{j}(h_{m})-1)|/h_{m}\le\Theta^{2}h_{m}\to0 ∣ ( η i ( h m ) − 1 ) ( η j ( h m ) − 1 ) ∣/ h m ≤ Θ 2 h m → 0 ; the entries of v m v_{m} v m converge to those of v v v ; and ∂ i ψ \partial_{i}\psi ∂ i ψ , ∂ j ∂ i ψ \partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi ∂ j ∂ i ψ are continuous (Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §sequential ). So the first three terms of (12.3) converge to ∑ i ( − θ i v i ∂ i ψ ( v ) + θ i c i ∂ i ∂ i ψ ( v ) ) = Λ ψ ( v ) \sum_{i}\bigl(-\theta_{i}v_{i}\partial_{i}\psi(v)+\theta_{i}c_{i}\partial_{i}\partial_{i}\psi(v)\bigr)=\Lambda\psi(v) ∑ i ( − θ i v i ∂ i ψ ( v ) + θ i c i ∂ i ∂ i ψ ( v ) ) = Λ ψ ( v ) , because θ i c i = a i \theta_{i}c_{i}=a_{i} θ i c i = a i and θ i = a i / c i \theta_{i}=a_{i}/c_{i} θ i = a i / c i by Gaussian Analysis Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure with Noise Weights: Standing Notation §rates . For the last term let V V V be a real bound of the ∥ v m ∥ \lVert v_{m}\rVert ∥ v m ∥ , and let ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 . By continuity of the finitely many functions ∂ j ∂ i ψ \partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi ∂ j ∂ i ψ at v v v there is ϱ > 0 \varrho>0 ϱ > 0 with ∣ ∂ j ∂ i ψ ( y ) − ∂ j ∂ i ψ ( v ) ∣ ≤ ε / 2 |\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi(y)-\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi(v)|\le\varepsilon/2 ∣ ∂ j ∂ i ψ ( y ) − ∂ j ∂ i ψ ( v ) ∣ ≤ ε /2 whenever ∥ y − v ∥ < ϱ \lVert y-v\rVert<\varrho ∥ y − v ∥ < ϱ . Fix z z z and put d m = d h m ( v m , z ) d_{m}=d_{h_{m}}(v_{m},z) d m = d h m ( v m , z ) ; by (12.2), ∥ d m ∥ 2 ≤ ( 2 Θ 2 V 2 + 4 Θ ∥ z ∥ 2 ) h m → 0 \lVert d_{m}\rVert^{2}\le(2\Theta^{2}V^{2}+4\Theta\lVert z\rVert^{2})h_{m}\to0 ∥ d m ∥ 2 ≤ ( 2 Θ 2 V 2 + 4Θ ∥ z ∥ 2 ) h m → 0 , so there is m 0 m_{0} m 0 with ∥ v m − v ∥ < ϱ / 2 \lVert v_{m}-v\rVert<\varrho/2 ∥ v m − v ∥ < ϱ /2 and ∥ d m ∥ < ϱ / 2 \lVert d_{m}\rVert<\varrho/2 ∥ d m ∥ < ϱ /2 for m ≥ m 0 m\ge m_{0} m ≥ m 0 . For such m m m every point of the segment from v m v_{m} v m to v m + d m v_{m}+d_{m} v m + d m lies within ϱ \varrho ϱ of v v v , so ∣ ∂ j ∂ i ψ ( y ) − ∂ j ∂ i ψ ( v m ) ∣ ≤ ε |\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi(y)-\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi(v_{m})|\le\varepsilon ∣ ∂ j ∂ i ψ ( y ) − ∂ j ∂ i ψ ( v m ) ∣ ≤ ε on it, and part (iii) of Multivariate Taylor Expansion with Uniform Second-Order Remainder with ε ˉ = ε \bar{\varepsilon}=\varepsilon ε ˉ = ε gives ∣ R h m ( v m , z ) ∣ / h m ≤ 1 2 n ε ( 2 Θ 2 V 2 + 4 Θ ∥ z ∥ 2 ) |R_{h_{m}}(v_{m},z)|/h_{m}\le\frac12n\varepsilon(2\Theta^{2}V^{2}+4\Theta\lVert z\rVert^{2}) ∣ R h m ( v m , z ) ∣/ h m ≤ 2 1 n ε ( 2 Θ 2 V 2 + 4Θ ∥ z ∥ 2 ) . As ε \varepsilon ε was arbitrary, R h m ( v m , z ) / h m → 0 R_{h_{m}}(v_{m},z)/h_{m}\to0 R h m ( v m , z ) / h m → 0 for every z z z . By (12.4) and (12.2), ∣ R h m ( v m , z ) ∣ / h m ≤ n M 2 ( 2 Θ 2 V 2 + 4 Θ ∥ z ∥ 2 ) |R_{h_{m}}(v_{m},z)|/h_{m}\le nM_{2}(2\Theta^{2}V^{2}+4\Theta\lVert z\rVert^{2}) ∣ R h m ( v m , z ) ∣/ h m ≤ n M 2 ( 2 Θ 2 V 2 + 4Θ ∥ z ∥ 2 ) , which is γ n \gamma_{n} γ n -integrable by Step 2; so Dominated Convergence Theorem gives 1 h m ∫ R h m ( v m , z ) γ n ( d z ) → 0 \frac{1}{h_{m}}\int R_{h_{m}}(v_{m},z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\to0 h m 1 ∫ R h m ( v m , z ) γ n ( d z ) → 0 .
(f) The derivative. Let x ∈ X x\in X x ∈ X , u = p n ( x ) u=p_{n}(x) u = p n ( x ) , and let h ≠ 0 h\ne0 h = 0 be real with t + h ≥ 0 t+h\ge0 t + h ≥ 0 and ∣ h ∣ ≤ 1 |h|\le1 ∣ h ∣ ≤ 1 ; put s h = min { t , t + h } ≥ 0 s_{h}=\min\{t,t+h\}\ge0 s h = min { t , t + h } ≥ 0 . If h > 0 h>0 h > 0 , claim 3 (with t t t , h h h in place of s s s , t t t ) and the linearity in claim 2 give P t + h F − P t F = P t ( P h F ) − P t F = P t ( P h F − F ) P_{t+h}F-P_{t}F=P_{t}(P_{h}F)-P_{t}F=P_{t}(P_{h}F-F) P t + h F − P t F = P t ( P h F ) − P t F = P t ( P h F − F ) ; if h < 0 h<0 h < 0 , claim 3 gives P t F = P t + h ( P ∣ h ∣ F ) P_{t}F=P_{t+h}(P_{|h|}F) P t F = P t + h ( P ∣ h ∣ F ) , so P t + h F − P t F = − P t + h ( P ∣ h ∣ F − F ) P_{t+h}F-P_{t}F=-P_{t+h}(P_{|h|}F-F) P t + h F − P t F = − P t + h ( P ∣ h ∣ F − F ) . In both cases P t + h F − P t F = h ∣ h ∣ P s h ( P ∣ h ∣ F − F ) P_{t+h}F-P_{t}F=\frac{h}{|h|}P_{s_{h}}(P_{|h|}F-F) P t + h F − P t F = ∣ h ∣ h P s h ( P ∣ h ∣ F − F ) . The function Q h = ( ψ ∣ h ∣ − ψ ) / ∣ h ∣ Q_{h}=(\psi_{|h|}-\psi)/|h| Q h = ( ψ ∣ h ∣ − ψ ) /∣ h ∣ is continuous and, by (12.5), of polynomial growth with constants ( C ∗ , 2 ) (C_{*},2) ( C ∗ , 2 ) ; as P ∣ h ∣ F − F = ∣ h ∣ Q h ∘ p n P_{|h|}F-F=|h|\,Q_{h}\circ p_{n} P ∣ h ∣ F − F = ∣ h ∣ Q h ∘ p n by claim 2, Step 10 and (9.4) give
P t + h F ( x ) − P t F ( x ) h = ∫ Q h ( η ( s h ) ⊙ u + ξ ( s h ) ⊙ z ) γ n ( d z ) . ( 12.6 ) \frac{P_{t+h}F(x)-P_{t}F(x)}{h}=\int Q_{h}\bigl(\eta(s_{h})\odot u+\xi(s_{h})\odot z\bigr)\,\gamma_{n}(dz).\qquad(12.6) h P t + h F ( x ) − P t F ( x ) = ∫ Q h ( η ( s h ) ⊙ u + ξ ( s h ) ⊙ z ) γ n ( d z ) . ( 12.6 )
Let ( h m ) (h_{m}) ( h m ) be a sequence of such numbers converging to 0 0 0 . Then s h m → t s_{h_{m}}\to t s h m → t , and for each z z z the points v m ( z ) = η ( s h m ) ⊙ u + ξ ( s h m ) ⊙ z v_{m}(z)=\eta(s_{h_{m}})\odot u+\xi(s_{h_{m}})\odot z v m ( z ) = η ( s h m ) ⊙ u + ξ ( s h m ) ⊙ z converge to v ( z ) = η ( t ) ⊙ u + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z v(z)=\eta(t)\odot u+\xi(t)\odot z v ( z ) = η ( t ) ⊙ u + ξ ( t ) ⊙ z by Step 6(iv); so (e), applied with ∣ h m ∣ |h_{m}| ∣ h m ∣ in place of h m h_{m} h m , gives Q h m ( v m ( z ) ) → Λ ψ ( v ( z ) ) Q_{h_{m}}(v_{m}(z))\to\Lambda\psi(v(z)) Q h m ( v m ( z )) → Λ ψ ( v ( z )) . By (12.5), Step 1 and claim 5 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities , ∣ Q h m ( v m ( z ) ) ∣ ≤ C ∗ ( 1 + ( ∥ u ∥ + ∥ z ∥ ) 2 ) ≤ C ∗ ( 1 + 2 ∥ u ∥ 2 + 2 ∥ z ∥ 2 ) |Q_{h_{m}}(v_{m}(z))|\le C_{*}(1+(\lVert u\rVert+\lVert z\rVert)^{2})\le C_{*}(1+2\lVert u\rVert^{2}+2\lVert z\rVert^{2}) ∣ Q h m ( v m ( z )) ∣ ≤ C ∗ ( 1 + (∥ u ∥ + ∥ z ∥ ) 2 ) ≤ C ∗ ( 1 + 2 ∥ u ∥ 2 + 2 ∥ z ∥ 2 ) , which is γ n \gamma_{n} γ n -integrable by Step 2. By Dominated Convergence Theorem , the quotients (12.6) along ( h m ) (h_{m}) ( h m ) converge to ∫ Λ ψ ( v ( z ) ) γ n ( d z ) = ( Λ ψ ) t ( u ) = P t ( L a F ) ( x ) \int\Lambda\psi(v(z))\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=(\Lambda\psi)_{t}(u)=P_{t}(L^{a}F)(x) ∫ Λ ψ ( v ( z )) γ n ( d z ) = ( Λ ψ ) t ( u ) = P t ( L a F ) ( x ) , by (b). Finally, if the limit in claim 12 failed, there would be ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 and, for each m ∈ N m\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N , a real h m ≠ 0 h_{m}\ne0 h m = 0 with ∣ h m ∣ < 1 / m |h_{m}|<1/m ∣ h m ∣ < 1/ m and t + h m ≥ 0 t+h_{m}\ge0 t + h m ≥ 0 whose difference quotient differs from P t ( L a F ) ( x ) P_{t}(L^{a}F)(x) P t ( L a F ) ( x ) by at least ε \varepsilon ε ; as h m → 0 h_{m}\to0 h m → 0 , this contradicts what was just shown. Hence
lim h → 0 P t + h F ( x ) − P t F ( x ) h = P t ( L a F ) ( x ) . \lim_{h\to0}\frac{P_{t+h}F(x)-P_{t}F(x)}{h}=P_{t}(L^{a}F)(x). h → 0 lim h P t + h F ( x ) − P t F ( x ) = P t ( L a F ) ( x ) .