TheoremBase

Mehler integrals are reduced via the coordinate projection to Gaussian integrals on RnR^n. Invariance of a product of two diagonal Gaussians under coordinatewise orthogonal reflections (affine changes of variables, Tonelli) gives the semigroup law, invariance, contraction and symmetry; coordinate factorisation plus the 1D Mehler identity gives the Hermite eigenfunctions; convolution and Gaussian smoothing give commutation and smoothing; uniform Taylor bounds, dominated convergence and Gaussian integration by parts give the generator.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Conventions. Throughout, nn denotes a natural number, γn\gamma_{n} abbreviates the diagonal Gaussian measure γc(n)\gamma_{c^{(n)}} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} of Variance Sequences and Their Truncations §truncations, and ρn\rho_{n} is the diagonal Gaussian density with variances c(n)c^{(n)}. By Diagonal Gaussian Measures on Euclidean Space §measure, γn\gamma_{n} is the measure with density ρn\rho_{n} with respect to Lebesgue measure λn\lambda_{n} on B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}); so by claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables every Borel f:Rn→[0,∞]f:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to[0,\infty] satisfies ∫f dγn=∫fρn dλn\int f\,d\gamma_{n}=\int f\rho_{n}\,d\lambda_{n} in [0,∞][0,\infty], and a Borel f:Rn→Rf:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} is γn\gamma_{n}-integrable exactly when fρnf\rho_{n} is λn\lambda_{n}-integrable, with the same identity. We call this the density rule. Integrals ∫… dz\int\dots\,dz over Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} are taken with respect to λn\lambda_{n}. For real v>0v>0, γ(v)\gamma_{(v)} denotes the diagonal Gaussian measure on R1\mathbb{R}^{1} with variance vector (v)(v), which is the measure written γv\gamma_{v} in Hermite Polynomials: Low Orders, Derivatives, Recursion, Scaling, the Addition Formula, Gaussian Orthogonality and the Mehler Identity, and ρ(v)\rho_{(v)} is its density. For a,b∈Rn\mathbf{a},\mathbf{b}\in\mathbb{R}^{n} put a⊙b=(a1b1,…,anbn)\mathbf{a}\odot\mathbf{b}=(\mathbf{a}_{1}\mathbf{b}_{1},\dots,\mathbf{a}_{n}\mathbf{b}_{n}); if every bk\mathbf{b}_{k} is nonzero, b−1=(b1−1,…,bn−1)\mathbf{b}^{-1}=(\mathbf{b}_{1}^{-1},\dots,\mathbf{b}_{n}^{-1}); 1=(1,…,1)\mathbf{1}=(1,\dots,1); and for k∈[n]k\in[n], δ(k)∈Rn\delta^{(k)}\in\mathbb{R}^{n} is the point with kk-th entry 11 and all other entries 00. For real r≥0r\ge0 put η(r)=(η1(r),…,ηn(r))\eta(r)=(\eta_{1}(r),\dots,\eta_{n}(r)) and ξ(r)=(ξ1(r),…,ξn(r))\xi(r)=(\xi_{1}(r),\dots,\xi_{n}(r)), with the numbers ηk(r)\eta_{k}(r), ξk(r)\xi_{k}(r) of The Mehler Maps and the Mehler Semigroup with Noise Weights on Continuous Cylindrical Functions of Polynomial Growth §map; by that clause 0<ηk(r)≤10<\eta_{k}(r)\le1, 0≤ξk(r)≤10\le\xi_{k}(r)\le1 and ηk(r)2+ξk(r)2=1\eta_{k}(r)^{2}+\xi_{k}(r)^{2}=1. We write Θn=max⁡{θ1,…,θn}\Theta_{n}=\max\{\theta_{1},\dots,\theta_{n}\}, with the rates of Gaussian Analysis Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure with Noise Weights: Standing Notation §rates.

A function φ:Rn→R\varphi:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} is called of polynomial growth with constants (Bφ,qφ)(B_{\varphi},q_{\varphi}) if it is continuous, Bφ≥0B_{\varphi}\ge0 is real, qφ∈N∪{0}q_{\varphi}\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\}, and ∣φ(y)∣≤Bφ(1+∥y∥qφ)|\varphi(y)|\le B_{\varphi}(1+\lVert y\rVert^{q_{\varphi}}) for every y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. By Continuous Cylindrical Functions of Polynomial Growth on a Hilbert Space §class and Continuous Cylindrical Functions of Polynomial Growth on a Hilbert Space §representation, (n,ψ,B,q)(n,\psi,B,q) is a representation of FF exactly when ψ\psi is of polynomial growth with constants (B,q)(B,q) and F=ψ∘pnF=\psi\circ p_{n}. For such φ\varphi and real r≥0r\ge0 we put

φr(u)=∫Rnφ(η(r)⊙u+ξ(r)⊙z) γn(dz)(u∈Rn),\varphi_{r}(u)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\varphi\bigl(\eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot z\bigr)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\qquad(u\in\mathbb{R}^{n}),

which is well defined by Step 9 below; for φ=ψ\varphi=\psi and r=tr=t this is the function ψt\psi_{t} of claim 2.

Step 1 (Elementary inequalities). Let a,b≥0a,b\ge0 be real and q,q′,Q∈N∪{0}q,q',Q\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\}, with a0=1a^{0}=1. (E1) If q≤Qq\le Q, then aq≤1+aQa^{q}\le1+a^{Q}: for a≤1a\le1, aq≤1a^{q}\le1, and for a≥1a\ge1, aq≤aQa^{q}\le a^{Q}. (E2) 1+aq≤2(1+a2)q1+a^{q}\le2(1+a^{2})^{q}, since each of 11 and aqa^{q} is at most (1+a2)q(1+a^{2})^{q}: for a≤1a\le1 because aq≤1a^{q}\le1, and for a≥1a\ge1 because aq≤a2q≤(1+a2)qa^{q}\le a^{2q}\le(1+a^{2})^{q}. (E3) (a+b)q≤2q(aq+bq)(a+b)^{q}\le2^{q}(a^{q}+b^{q}) and 1+(a+b)q≤2q(1+aq)(1+bq)1+(a+b)^{q}\le2^{q}(1+a^{q})(1+b^{q}): for q=0q=0 these read 1≤21\le2 and 2≤42\le4; for q≥1q\ge1, with m=max⁡{a,b}m=\max\{a,b\}, (a+b)q≤(2m)q=2qmq≤2q(aq+bq)(a+b)^{q}\le(2m)^{q}=2^{q}m^{q}\le2^{q}(a^{q}+b^{q}), whence 1+(a+b)q≤2q(1+aq+bq+aqbq)=2q(1+aq)(1+bq)1+(a+b)^{q}\le2^{q}(1+a^{q}+b^{q}+a^{q}b^{q})=2^{q}(1+a^{q})(1+b^{q}). (E4) (1+aq)(1+aq′)≤4(1+aq+q′)(1+a^{q})(1+a^{q'})\le4(1+a^{q+q'}), since by (E1) each of 11, aqa^{q}, aq′a^{q'}, aq+q′a^{q+q'} is at most 1+aq+q′1+a^{q+q'}; also 1+aq≤2(1+aQ)1+a^{q}\le2(1+a^{Q}) for q≤Qq\le Q, by (E1). (E5) If p≥1p\ge1 is real, m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} and p≤mp\le m, then ap≤1+ama^{p}\le1+a^{m}, for the power apa^{p} of Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §powers. Indeed 1p=11^{p}=1, because 1p=(1⋅1)p=1p1p1^{p}=(1\cdot1)^{p}=1^{p}1^{p} and 1p>01^{p}>0 by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §product and Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §values; so for a≤1a\le1, ap≤1a^{p}\le1 by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone, while for a≥1a\ge1 and p<mp<m, am=apam−p≥ap1m−p=apa^{m}=a^{p}a^{m-p}\ge a^{p}1^{m-p}=a^{p} by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §exponents, Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone and Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §agreement, the case p=mp=m being Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §agreement. Finally, for a,y∈Rn\mathbf{a},y\in\mathbb{R}^{n} with ∣ak∣≤1|\mathbf{a}_{k}|\le1 for every kk, ∥a⊙y∥≤∥y∥\lVert\mathbf{a}\odot y\rVert\le\lVert y\rVert by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square and claim 5 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities; and ∣yk∣≤∥y∥|y_{k}|\le\lVert y\rVert by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §coordinate.

Step 2 (Moments and the transfer rule). For N∈N∪{0}N\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\} the function y↦(1+∣y∣2)Ny\mapsto(1+|y|^{2})^{N} on XX is continuous, hence Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, and

KN=∫X(1+∣y∣2)N γc(dy)<∞.K_{N}=\int_{X}(1+|y|^{2})^{N}\,\gamma_{c}(dy)<\infty .

Indeed, put cˉ=∑k=1∞ck>0\bar{c}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}>0, so that ck≤cˉc_{k}\le\bar{c} for every kk by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §dominates, and α=1/(4cˉ)\alpha=1/(4\bar{c}). The function u↦(1+u/α)Nu\mapsto(1+u/\alpha)^{N} is a polynomial function, so claim 1 of The Exponential Function Dominates Every Polynomial Function (with ε=1\varepsilon=1, multiplying by exp⁡(u)>0\exp(u)>0 and using claims 1 and 2 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function) gives a real u0≥1u_{0}\ge1 with (1+u/α)N<exp⁡(u)(1+u/\alpha)^{N}<\exp(u) for u≥u0u\ge u_{0}, while (1+u/α)N≤(1+u0/α)N(1+u/\alpha)^{N}\le(1+u_{0}/\alpha)^{N} for 0≤u≤u00\le u\le u_{0}; with u=α∣y∣2u=\alpha|y|^{2} and CN=(1+u0/α)NC_{N}=(1+u_{0}/\alpha)^{N} this gives (1+∣y∣2)N≤CN+exp⁡(α∣y∣2)(1+|y|^{2})^{N}\le C_{N}+\exp(\alpha|y|^{2}) for every y∈Xy\in X. The function y↦exp⁡(α∣y∣2)y\mapsto\exp(\alpha|y|^{2}) is Borel and γc\gamma_{c}-integrable by Moments of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space: Coordinate Covariances, Finite Second Moment, and Exponential Moments of the Squared Norm §exponential, applied with this α\alpha and with 1/21/2 in place of the number written θ\theta there, since 2αck≤1/22\alpha c_{k}\le1/2; constants are integrable by claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, so KN<∞K_{N}<\infty by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative. The coordinate map pnp_{n} is linear with ∥pn(x)∥≤∣x∣\lVert p_{n}(x)\rVert\le|x| by Orthonormal Expansions in a Real Hilbert Space §bessel, hence Lipschitz, continuous and Borel; and (pn)#γc=γn(p_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{n} by Diagonal Gaussian Measures on a Hilbert Space §measure, push-forwards being the image measures of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward. So claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables gives the transfer rule: ∫Rng dγn=∫Xg(pnx) γc(dx)\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}g\,d\gamma_{n}=\int_{X}g(p_{n}x)\,\gamma_{c}(dx) for every Borel g:Rn→[0,∞]g:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to[0,\infty], and a Borel g:Rn→Rg:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} is γn\gamma_{n}-integrable exactly when g∘png\circ p_{n} is γc\gamma_{c}-integrable, with the same identity. In particular

∫Rn(1+∥z∥2)N γn(dz)=∫X(1+∥pny∥2)N γc(dy)≤KN,\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}(1+\lVert z\rVert^{2})^{N}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=\int_{X}(1+\lVert p_{n}y\rVert^{2})^{N}\,\gamma_{c}(dy)\le K_{N},

and therefore, by (E2), ∫(1+∥z∥m) γn(dz)≤2Km\int(1+\lVert z\rVert^{m})\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\le2K_{m} for every m∈N∪{0}m\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\}, and ∫∥z∥2 γn(dz)≤K1\int\lVert z\rVert^{2}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\le K_{1}. Since the kk-th entry of pn(y)p_{n}(y) is yky_{k}, Moments of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space: Coordinate Covariances, Finite Second Moment, and Exponential Moments of the Squared Norm §coordinates and the transfer rule show that for j,k∈[n]j,k\in[n] the functions z↦zkz\mapsto z_{k} and z↦zjzkz\mapsto z_{j}z_{k} are γn\gamma_{n}-integrable, with ∫zk γn(dz)=0\int z_{k}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=0, ∫zk2 γn(dz)=ck\int z_{k}^{2}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=c_{k}, and ∫zjzk γn(dz)=0\int z_{j}z_{k}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=0 for j≠kj\ne k.

Step 3 (Measurability). Equip Rn×Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n} with the product metric of two copies of (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}); by Euclidean Space is a Separable Metric Space §separable and The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Product of Two Separable Metric Spaces is the Product Sigma-Algebra §product its Borel σ\sigma-algebra is B(Rn)⊗B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), on which the product measures of Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure are defined. A map between two of the spaces R\mathbb{R}, Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, Rn×Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n} each of whose entries is a constant plus a fixed real linear combination of the entries of the argument satisfies a Lipschitz bound, since by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §coordinate each entry of the difference of two arguments is at most their distance; so such an affine map is continuous, hence Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. Continuous real functions are Borel by the same claim, composites of Borel maps are Borel by claim 4 there, and sums, products, absolute values, maxima and positive and negative parts of measurable real functions are measurable by Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions and Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral. Every function on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} or on Rn×Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n} integrated below is built in this way from Borel functions on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} and affine maps (for instance (y,z)↦φ(a⊙y+b⊙z)(y,z)\mapsto\varphi(\mathbf{a}\odot y+\mathbf{b}\odot z) with φ\varphi Borel), and is therefore Borel; we use this without further comment. The measures λn\lambda_{n}, γn\gamma_{n}, γc\gamma_{c} are σ\sigma-finite (λn\lambda_{n} by Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space is Sigma-Finite §sigma-finite, the others being probability measures), so Tonelli and Fubini Theorems applies to their products. A composite of continuous maps is continuous by Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §on-subset. Continuity at every point in the sense of clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set (continuity at a point) coincides with continuity for the Euclidean distances in the sense of Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces: by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §distance and Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square, the sums of squares occurring in the former are the squares of the corresponding distances, and for real a,b≥0a,b\ge0 one has a2<b2a^{2}<b^{2} exactly when a<ba<b, by claim 5 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities (the square root being strictly increasing, with a2=a\sqrt{a^{2}}=a); so the two notions are used interchangeably.

Step 4 (Partial derivatives after an affine substitution). Let f:Rn→Rf:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}, a,b∈Rn\mathbf{a},\mathbf{b}\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, g(v)=f(a+b⊙v)g(v)=f(\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\odot v), k∈[n]k\in[n] and v∈Rnv\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, and suppose that the partial derivative ∂kf(w)\partial_{k}f(w) exists at w=a+b⊙vw=\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\odot v. Then ∂kg(v)\partial_{k}g(v) exists and equals bk∂kf(w)\mathbf{b}_{k}\partial_{k}f(w). Indeed, for real h≠0h\ne0, a+b⊙(v+hδ(k))=w+bkh δ(k)\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\odot(v+h\delta^{(k)})=w+\mathbf{b}_{k}h\,\delta^{(k)}. If bk=0\mathbf{b}_{k}=0, the difference quotient of gg is 0=bk∂kf(w)0=\mathbf{b}_{k}\partial_{k}f(w) for every hh. If bk≠0\mathbf{b}_{k}\ne0 and ε>0\varepsilon>0, let δ>0\delta>0 be as in Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set for ff at ww and ε/∣bk∣\varepsilon/|\mathbf{b}_{k}|; for 0<∣h∣<δ/∣bk∣0<|h|<\delta/|\mathbf{b}_{k}| the number h′=bkhh'=\mathbf{b}_{k}h satisfies 0<∣h′∣<δ0<|h'|<\delta, and

∣g(v+hδ(k))−g(v)h−bk∂kf(w)∣=∣bk∣ ∣f(w+h′δ(k))−f(w)h′−∂kf(w)∣<ε.\Bigl|\frac{g(v+h\delta^{(k)})-g(v)}{h}-\mathbf{b}_{k}\partial_{k}f(w)\Bigr|=|\mathbf{b}_{k}|\,\Bigl|\frac{f(w+h'\delta^{(k)})-f(w)}{h'}-\partial_{k}f(w)\Bigr|<\varepsilon .

Since v↦a+b⊙vv\mapsto\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\odot v is continuous (Step 3) and a real multiple of a function of class C1C^{1} is of class C1C^{1} (directly from Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set), clauses 1 to 4 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set give: if ff is of class C1C^{1} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, so is gg, with ∂kg(v)=bk∂kf(a+b⊙v)\partial_{k}g(v)=\mathbf{b}_{k}\partial_{k}f(\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\odot v); and if ff is of class C2C^{2}, then ∂kg\partial_{k}g is bk\mathbf{b}_{k} times the function obtained in the same way from the C1C^{1} function ∂kf\partial_{k}f, so gg is of class C2C^{2} with ∂l∂kg(v)=blbk∂l∂kf(a+b⊙v)\partial_{l}\partial_{k}g(v)=\mathbf{b}_{l}\mathbf{b}_{k}\partial_{l}\partial_{k}f(\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\odot v). Consequently, if ff and its first (and second) partial derivatives are bounded, so are those of gg; when ∣bk∣≤1|\mathbf{b}_{k}|\le1 for every kk, with the same bounds.

Step 5 (Affine change of variables). Let a,b∈Rn\mathbf{a},\mathbf{b}\in\mathbb{R}^{n} with bk>0\mathbf{b}_{k}>0 for every kk, and β=∏k=1nbk>0\beta=\prod_{k=1}^{n}\mathbf{b}_{k}>0. Then for every Borel f:Rn→[0,∞]f:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to[0,\infty],

∫f(a+b⊙z) dz=β−1∫f(w) dwin [0,∞].\int f(\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\odot z)\,dz=\beta^{-1}\int f(w)\,dw\qquad\text{in }[0,\infty].

Indeed, Φ(z)=a+b⊙z\Phi(z)=\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\odot z is a bijection of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with inverse Φ−1(w)=b−1⊙(w−a)\Phi^{-1}(w)=\mathbf{b}^{-1}\odot(w-\mathbf{a}). The coordinate functions v↦vjv\mapsto v_{j} are continuous with constant partial derivatives 00 or 11, directly from Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set; so by Step 4 the components of Φ\Phi and of Φ−1\Phi^{-1} are of class C1C^{1}, and their Jacobian matrices are, at every point, the diagonal matrices with diagonal entries bk\mathbf{b}_{k}, respectively bk−1\mathbf{b}_{k}^{-1}. The first is symmetric and positive definite, since x⋅(DΦ x)=∑kbkxk2>0x\cdot(D\Phi\,x)=\sum_{k}\mathbf{b}_{k}x_{k}^{2}>0 for x≠0x\ne0; the second is its inverse matrix; and det⁡DΦ=β\det D\Phi=\beta by The Determinant of a Triangular Matrix is the Product of its Diagonal Entries, a diagonal matrix being lower triangular. So Change of Variables for the Lebesgue Integral under a Continuously Differentiable Bijection of Euclidean Space with Symmetric Positive Definite Jacobian Matrix, and the Density of a Push-Forward §integrals gives ∫(f∘Φ) β dz=∫f dw\int(f\circ\Phi)\,\beta\,dz=\int f\,dw, and the claim follows by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative.

Step 6 (The coefficients). Let k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. (i) For real y≥0y\ge0, 0≤1−exp⁡(−y)≤y0\le1-\exp(-y)\le y: by claim 6 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities, exp⁡(−y)≤1\exp(-y)\le1 and exp⁡(y)−1≤yexp⁡(y)\exp(y)-1\le y\exp(y), and multiplying the latter by exp⁡(−y)>0\exp(-y)>0 gives 1−exp⁡(−y)≤y1-\exp(-y)\le y, since exp⁡(y)exp⁡(−y)=exp⁡(0)=1\exp(y)\exp(-y)=\exp(0)=1 by claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function. (ii) For real y>0y>0, ∣1−exp⁡(−y)y−1∣≤yexp⁡(y)\bigl|\frac{1-\exp(-y)}{y}-1\bigr|\le y\exp(y): by (i), exp⁡(−y)≥1−y\exp(-y)\ge1-y, and by claim 6 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities, y≤exp⁡(y)−1≤y+y2exp⁡(y)y\le\exp(y)-1\le y+y^{2}\exp(y); as 1−exp⁡(−y)=exp⁡(−y)(exp⁡(y)−1)1-\exp(-y)=\exp(-y)(\exp(y)-1) and 0<exp⁡(−y)≤10<\exp(-y)\le1, this gives (1−y)y≤1−exp⁡(−y)≤y+y2exp⁡(y)(1-y)y\le1-\exp(-y)\le y+y^{2}\exp(y), and y≤yexp⁡(y)y\le y\exp(y). (iii) Hence, for real h>0h>0, 0≤1−ηk(h)≤θkh0\le1-\eta_{k}(h)\le\theta_{k}h and 0≤ξk(h)2=1−exp⁡(−2θkh)≤2θkh0\le\xi_{k}(h)^{2}=1-\exp(-2\theta_{k}h)\le2\theta_{k}h, and

∣1−ηk(h)h−θk∣≤θk2hexp⁡(θkh),∣ξk(h)2h−2θk∣≤4θk2hexp⁡(2θkh),\Bigl|\frac{1-\eta_{k}(h)}{h}-\theta_{k}\Bigr|\le\theta_{k}^{2}h\exp(\theta_{k}h),\qquad\Bigl|\frac{\xi_{k}(h)^{2}}{h}-2\theta_{k}\Bigr|\le4\theta_{k}^{2}h\exp(2\theta_{k}h),

by (i) and (ii) with y=θkhy=\theta_{k}h, respectively y=2θkhy=2\theta_{k}h; for 0<h≤10<h\le1 the right-hand sides are at most θk2exp⁡(θk)h\theta_{k}^{2}\exp(\theta_{k})h and 4θk2exp⁡(2θk)h4\theta_{k}^{2}\exp(2\theta_{k})h, exp⁡\exp being increasing by claim 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function. (iv) If (rm)m∈N(r_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} is a sequence in [0,∞)[0,\infty) converging to rr, then ηk(rm)→ηk(r)\eta_{k}(r_{m})\to\eta_{k}(r) and ξk(rm)→ξk(r)\xi_{k}(r_{m})\to\xi_{k}(r), by claims 3(f) and 3(e) of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities. (v) ηk(0)=1\eta_{k}(0)=1 and ξk(0)=0\xi_{k}(0)=0, since exp⁡(0)=1\exp(0)=1; for r>0r>0, exp⁡(−2θkr)<exp⁡(0)=1\exp(-2\theta_{k}r)<\exp(0)=1 by claim 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function, so ξk(r)>0\xi_{k}(r)>0 by claim 5 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities. (vi) For real s,t≥0s,t\ge0, claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function gives ηk(s)ηk(t)=ηk(s+t)\eta_{k}(s)\eta_{k}(t)=\eta_{k}(s+t), ηk(t)2=exp⁡(−2θkt)\eta_{k}(t)^{2}=\exp(-2\theta_{k}t), and

ηk(t)2ξk(s)2+ξk(t)2=exp⁡(−2θkt)(1−exp⁡(−2θks))+1−exp⁡(−2θkt)=1−exp⁡(−2θk(s+t))=ξk(s+t)2.\eta_{k}(t)^{2}\xi_{k}(s)^{2}+\xi_{k}(t)^{2}=\exp(-2\theta_{k}t)\bigl(1-\exp(-2\theta_{k}s)\bigr)+1-\exp(-2\theta_{k}t)=1-\exp(-2\theta_{k}(s+t))=\xi_{k}(s+t)^{2}.

Step 7 (Gaussian reflection). Let a,b∈Rn\mathbf{a},\mathbf{b}\in\mathbb{R}^{n} with bk>0\mathbf{b}_{k}>0 and ak2+bk2=1\mathbf{a}_{k}^{2}+\mathbf{b}_{k}^{2}=1 for every k∈[n]k\in[n], and let S:Rn×Rn→Rn×RnS:\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n} be the affine map S(y,z)=(a⊙y+b⊙z, b⊙y−a⊙z)S(y,z)=(\mathbf{a}\odot y+\mathbf{b}\odot z,\ \mathbf{b}\odot y-\mathbf{a}\odot z).

(a) For every measurable f:Rn×Rn→[0,∞)f:\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n}\to[0,\infty),

∫(∫f(S(y,z)) γn(dz))γn(dy)=∫(∫f(y,z) γn(dz))γn(dy)in [0,∞],\int\Bigl(\int f(S(y,z))\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)=\int\Bigl(\int f(y,z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)\qquad\text{in }[0,\infty],

the inner integrands and the inner integrals, as functions of yy, being measurable by Tonelli and Fubini Theorems applied to γn⊗γn\gamma_{n}\otimes\gamma_{n}.

(b) If f:Rn×Rn→Rf:\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} is measurable and ∣f(y,z)∣≤K(1+∥y∥m)(1+∥z∥m)|f(y,z)|\le K(1+\lVert y\rVert^{m})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{m}) for some real K≥0K\ge0 and m∈N∪{0}m\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\}, then for every yy the functions z↦f(y,z)z\mapsto f(y,z) and z↦f(S(y,z))z\mapsto f(S(y,z)) are γn\gamma_{n}-integrable, the functions y↦∫f(y,z) γn(dz)y\mapsto\int f(y,z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz) and y↦∫f(S(y,z)) γn(dz)y\mapsto\int f(S(y,z))\,\gamma_{n}(dz) are γn\gamma_{n}-integrable, and the two iterated integrals of (a) are equal real numbers.

Proof of (a). Let β=∏kbk\beta=\prod_{k}\mathbf{b}_{k}. For all y,zy,z and kk, (akyk+bkzk)2+(bkyk−akzk)2=yk2+zk2(\mathbf{a}_{k}y_{k}+\mathbf{b}_{k}z_{k})^{2}+(\mathbf{b}_{k}y_{k}-\mathbf{a}_{k}z_{k})^{2}=y_{k}^{2}+z_{k}^{2}; so the weighted squares of The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §scaling satisfy ∣S1(y,z)∣c(n)2+∣S2(y,z)∣c(n)2=∣y∣c(n)2+∣z∣c(n)2|S_{1}(y,z)|^{2}_{c^{(n)}}+|S_{2}(y,z)|^{2}_{c^{(n)}}=|y|^{2}_{c^{(n)}}+|z|^{2}_{c^{(n)}}, where S=(S1,S2)S=(S_{1},S_{2}), and The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §density with claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function gives

ρn(S1(y,z)) ρn(S2(y,z))=ρn(y) ρn(z).(7.1)\rho_{n}(S_{1}(y,z))\,\rho_{n}(S_{2}(y,z))=\rho_{n}(y)\,\rho_{n}(z).\qquad(7.1)

Put g(w,v)=ρn(w)ρn(v)f(w,v)g(w,v)=\rho_{n}(w)\rho_{n}(v)f(w,v), measurable and nonnegative, ρn\rho_{n} being Borel and positive by The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Gradient, Normalization, Second Moments and Exponential Moments of Diagonal Quadratic Forms §regularity. By the density rule (twice), Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative (to move the factor ρn(y)\rho_{n}(y) inside) and (7.1), the left-hand side of (a) equals ∫(∫g(S(y,z)) dz)dy\int\bigl(\int g(S(y,z))\,dz\bigr)dy. Fix yy and put ky(w)=g(w,b−1⊙(y−a⊙w))k_{y}(w)=g\bigl(w,\mathbf{b}^{-1}\odot(y-\mathbf{a}\odot w)\bigr). Since bk2=1−ak2\mathbf{b}_{k}^{2}=1-\mathbf{a}_{k}^{2}, for every zz

b−1⊙(y−a⊙(a⊙y+b⊙z))=b−1⊙(b⊙b⊙y−a⊙b⊙z)=b⊙y−a⊙z,\mathbf{b}^{-1}\odot\bigl(y-\mathbf{a}\odot(\mathbf{a}\odot y+\mathbf{b}\odot z)\bigr)=\mathbf{b}^{-1}\odot(\mathbf{b}\odot\mathbf{b}\odot y-\mathbf{a}\odot\mathbf{b}\odot z)=\mathbf{b}\odot y-\mathbf{a}\odot z,

that is, ky(a⊙y+b⊙z)=g(S(y,z))k_{y}(\mathbf{a}\odot y+\mathbf{b}\odot z)=g(S(y,z)); so Step 5 gives ∫g(S(y,z)) dz=β−1∫ky(w) dw\int g(S(y,z))\,dz=\beta^{-1}\int k_{y}(w)\,dw. With the measurable function κ(y,w)=g(w,b−1⊙(y−a⊙w))\kappa(y,w)=g\bigl(w,\mathbf{b}^{-1}\odot(y-\mathbf{a}\odot w)\bigr) on Rn×Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n}, Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative and Tonelli and Fubini Theorems for λn⊗λn\lambda_{n}\otimes\lambda_{n} give that the left-hand side equals β−1∫(∫κ(y,w) dy)dw\beta^{-1}\int\bigl(\int\kappa(y,w)\,dy\bigr)dw. Fix ww; for every vv, κ(a⊙w+b⊙v,w)=g(w,v)\kappa(\mathbf{a}\odot w+\mathbf{b}\odot v,w)=g(w,v), so Step 5 (with a⊙w\mathbf{a}\odot w in place of a\mathbf{a}) gives ∫g(w,v) dv=β−1∫κ(y,w) dy\int g(w,v)\,dv=\beta^{-1}\int\kappa(y,w)\,dy. Hence the left-hand side equals ∫(∫g(w,v) dv)dw=∫(∫f(w,v)ρn(v) dv)ρn(w) dw\int\bigl(\int g(w,v)\,dv\bigr)dw=\int\bigl(\int f(w,v)\rho_{n}(v)\,dv\bigr)\rho_{n}(w)\,dw, which is the right-hand side by the density rule and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative.

Proof of (b). Since ∣ak∣,∣bk∣≤1|\mathbf{a}_{k}|,|\mathbf{b}_{k}|\le1, Step 1 and Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §triangle give ∥S1(y,z)∥,∥S2(y,z)∥≤∥y∥+∥z∥\lVert S_{1}(y,z)\rVert,\lVert S_{2}(y,z)\rVert\le\lVert y\rVert+\lVert z\rVert, so by (E3) and (E4)

∣f(S(y,z))∣≤K 22m(1+∥y∥m)2(1+∥z∥m)2≤22m+4K(1+∥y∥2m)(1+∥z∥2m),|f(S(y,z))|\le K\,2^{2m}(1+\lVert y\rVert^{m})^{2}(1+\lVert z\rVert^{m})^{2}\le2^{2m+4}K(1+\lVert y\rVert^{2m})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{2m}),

and by (E4) also ∣f(y,z)∣≤4K(1+∥y∥2m)(1+∥z∥2m)|f(y,z)|\le4K(1+\lVert y\rVert^{2m})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{2m}). Let hh be ff or f∘Sf\circ S, so ∣h(y,z)∣≤K′(1+∥y∥2m)(1+∥z∥2m)|h(y,z)|\le K'(1+\lVert y\rVert^{2m})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{2m}) with K′=22m+4KK'=2^{2m+4}K. Then h+,h−≤∣h∣h^{+},h^{-}\le|h|, and by Step 2 and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative, ∫∣h(y,z)∣ γn(dz)≤2K′K2m(1+∥y∥2m)<∞\int|h(y,z)|\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\le2K'K_{2m}(1+\lVert y\rVert^{2m})<\infty for every yy, so z↦h(y,z)z\mapsto h(y,z) is integrable; the functions y↦∫h±(y,z) γn(dz)y\mapsto\int h^{\pm}(y,z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz) are measurable (Tonelli and Fubini Theorems) with integrals at most 4K′K2m2<∞4K'K_{2m}^{2}<\infty; hence y↦∫h(y,z) γn(dz)=∫h+(y,z) γn(dz)−∫h−(y,z) γn(dz)y\mapsto\int h(y,z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=\int h^{+}(y,z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)-\int h^{-}(y,z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz) is integrable, and its integral is the difference of the iterated integrals of h+h^{+} and h−h^{-}, by Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable. Since (f∘S)±=f±∘S(f\circ S)^{\pm}=f^{\pm}\circ S, (a) applied to f+f^{+} and to f−f^{-} gives the claim.

Step 8 (Products of one-dimensional integrals). Let g1,…,gn:R→Rg_{1},\dots,g_{n}:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} be Borel with ∫∣gk∣ dγ(ck)<∞\int|g_{k}|\,d\gamma_{(c_{k})}<\infty for every kk. Then z↦∏k=1ngk(zk)z\mapsto\prod_{k=1}^{n}g_{k}(z_{k}) is Borel and γn\gamma_{n}-integrable on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, and

∫Rn∏k=1ngk(zk) γn(dz)=∏k=1n∫Rgk dγ(ck).\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\prod_{k=1}^{n}g_{k}(z_{k})\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=\prod_{k=1}^{n}\int_{\mathbb{R}}g_{k}\,d\gamma_{(c_{k})} .

The function is Borel because the coordinate maps z↦zkz\mapsto z_{k} are measurable by claims 1 and 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets (Step 3). We argue by induction on nn. For n=1n=1, γ1=γ(c1)\gamma_{1}=\gamma_{(c_{1})}. Let n≥2n\ge2 and identify Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with Rn−1×R\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\times\mathbb{R}, z=(z′,s)z=(z',s), as in Finite Products of Lebesgue Measure and Coordinate Integration on Rl\mathbb{R}^l; by claim 1 there, Lebesgue Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and claim 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets, B(Rn)=B(Rn−1)⊗B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})=\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n-1})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) and λn=λn−1⊗λ1\lambda_{n}=\lambda_{n-1}\otimes\lambda_{1}, both factors being σ\sigma-finite. Since ∣z∣c(n)2=∣z′∣c(n−1)2+s2/cn|z|^{2}_{c^{(n)}}=|z'|^{2}_{c^{(n-1)}}+s^{2}/c_{n} and the normalising sum of The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §density for c(n)c^{(n)} is the sum of those for c(n−1)c^{(n-1)} and for (cn)(c_{n}), claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function gives ρn(z)=ρn−1(z′)ρ(cn)(s)\rho_{n}(z)=\rho_{n-1}(z')\rho_{(c_{n})}(s). Put a(z′)=∏k<ngk(zk′)ρn−1(z′)a(z')=\prod_{k<n}g_{k}(z'_{k})\rho_{n-1}(z') and b(s)=gn(s)ρ(cn)(s)b(s)=g_{n}(s)\rho_{(c_{n})}(s), so that ∏kgk(zk)ρn(z)=a(z′)b(s)\prod_{k}g_{k}(z_{k})\rho_{n}(z)=a(z')b(s). By the induction hypothesis, applied to g1,…,gn−1g_{1},\dots,g_{n-1} and to ∣g1∣,…,∣gn−1∣|g_{1}|,\dots,|g_{n-1}|, and the density rule, aa is λn−1\lambda_{n-1}-integrable with ∫a dλn−1=∏k<n∫gk dγ(ck)\int a\,d\lambda_{n-1}=\prod_{k<n}\int g_{k}\,d\gamma_{(c_{k})}; likewise bb is λ1\lambda_{1}-integrable with ∫b dλ1=∫gn dγ(cn)\int b\,d\lambda_{1}=\int g_{n}\,d\gamma_{(c_{n})}. For each choice of signs, the function (z′,s)↦a±(z′)b±(s)(z',s)\mapsto a^{\pm}(z')b^{\pm}(s) is measurable for B(Rn−1)⊗B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n-1})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) (the projections being measurable by Product Sigma-Algebra), and Tonelli and Fubini Theorems with Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative gives ∫a±b± dλn=∫a± dλn−1∫b± dλ1<∞\int a^{\pm}b^{\pm}\,d\lambda_{n}=\int a^{\pm}\,d\lambda_{n-1}\int b^{\pm}\,d\lambda_{1}<\infty. As ∣ab∣=(a++a−)(b++b−)|ab|=(a^{+}+a^{-})(b^{+}+b^{-}) and ab=a+b+−a+b−−a−b++a−b−ab=a^{+}b^{+}-a^{+}b^{-}-a^{-}b^{+}+a^{-}b^{-}, the function abab is λn\lambda_{n}-integrable and, by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable and Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral, ∫ab dλn=(∫a+−∫a−)(∫b+−∫b−)=∫a dλn−1∫b dλ1\int ab\,d\lambda_{n}=\bigl(\int a^{+}-\int a^{-}\bigr)\bigl(\int b^{+}-\int b^{-}\bigr)=\int a\,d\lambda_{n-1}\int b\,d\lambda_{1}. The density rule turns this into the claim.

Step 9 (The integrals φr\varphi_{r}). Let φ\varphi be of polynomial growth with constants (Bφ,q)(B_{\varphi},q) and let r≥0r\ge0. For u,z∈Rnu,z\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, Step 1 and Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §triangle give ∥η(r)⊙u+ξ(r)⊙z∥≤∥u∥+∥z∥\lVert\eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot z\rVert\le\lVert u\rVert+\lVert z\rVert, so by (E3)

∣φ(η(r)⊙u+ξ(r)⊙z)∣≤Bφ(1+(∥u∥+∥z∥)q)≤2qBφ(1+∥u∥q)(1+∥z∥q).(9.1)|\varphi(\eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot z)|\le B_{\varphi}\bigl(1+(\lVert u\rVert+\lVert z\rVert)^{q}\bigr)\le2^{q}B_{\varphi}(1+\lVert u\rVert^{q})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{q}).\qquad(9.1)

The function z↦φ(η(r)⊙u+ξ(r)⊙z)z\mapsto\varphi(\eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot z) is continuous (Step 3), hence Borel, and by (9.1) and Step 2 it is γn\gamma_{n}-integrable; so φr(u)\varphi_{r}(u) is defined, and by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable and Step 2

∣φr(u)∣≤Bφ′(1+∥u∥q),Bφ′=2q+1BφKq.(9.2)|\varphi_{r}(u)|\le B'_{\varphi}(1+\lVert u\rVert^{q}),\qquad B'_{\varphi}=2^{q+1}B_{\varphi}K_{q}.\qquad(9.2)

φr\varphi_{r} is continuous: let (um)(u_{m}) converge to uu in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}; there is a real RR with ∥um∥≤R\lVert u_{m}\rVert\le R for every mm (take RR larger than ∥u∥+1\lVert u\rVert+1 and than the finitely many ∥um∥\lVert u_{m}\rVert with ∥um−u∥>1\lVert u_{m}-u\rVert>1). For every zz, the points η(r)⊙um+ξ(r)⊙z\eta(r)\odot u_{m}+\xi(r)\odot z converge to η(r)⊙u+ξ(r)⊙z\eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot z, their distance being at most ∥um−u∥\lVert u_{m}-u\rVert by Step 1, so the integrands converge by Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §sequential; by (9.1) they are dominated by the integrable function z↦2qBφ(1+Rq)(1+∥z∥q)z\mapsto2^{q}B_{\varphi}(1+R^{q})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{q}). So φr(um)→φr(u)\varphi_{r}(u_{m})\to\varphi_{r}(u) by Dominated Convergence Theorem, and φr\varphi_{r} is continuous at uu by Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §criterion. Thus φr\varphi_{r} is of polynomial growth with constants (Bφ′,q)(B'_{\varphi},q). Next, for fixed uu:

r↦φr(u) is continuous on [0,∞).(9.3)r\mapsto\varphi_{r}(u)\ \text{is continuous on }[0,\infty).\qquad(9.3)

Indeed, if (rm)(r_{m}) is a sequence in [0,∞)[0,\infty) converging to rr, then by Step 6(iv) every entry of η(rm)⊙u+ξ(rm)⊙z\eta(r_{m})\odot u+\xi(r_{m})\odot z converges to the corresponding entry of η(r)⊙u+ξ(r)⊙z\eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot z, so these points converge in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} (by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square and claim 3(e) of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities), the integrands converge by Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §sequential, they are dominated by 2qBφ(1+∥u∥q)(1+∥z∥q)2^{q}B_{\varphi}(1+\lVert u\rVert^{q})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{q}) by (9.1), and Dominated Convergence Theorem and Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §criterion (with A=[0,∞)A=[0,\infty)) apply. Finally:

(α1φ+α2χ)r=α1φr+α2χr,φr=φ if φ is constant,φ0=φ,(9.4)(\alpha_{1}\varphi+\alpha_{2}\chi)_{r}=\alpha_{1}\varphi_{r}+\alpha_{2}\chi_{r},\qquad\varphi_{r}=\varphi\ \text{if }\varphi\text{ is constant},\qquad\varphi_{0}=\varphi,\qquad(9.4)

for χ\chi also of polynomial growth and real α1,α2\alpha_{1},\alpha_{2}: the function α1φ+α2χ\alpha_{1}\varphi+\alpha_{2}\chi is continuous and, by (E4), of polynomial growth with constants (2(∣α1∣Bφ+∣α2∣Bχ),max⁡{q,qχ})(2(|\alpha_{1}|B_{\varphi}+|\alpha_{2}|B_{\chi}),\max\{q,q_{\chi}\}), and the first identity is Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable; the second is claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, γn\gamma_{n} being a probability measure; and the third holds because η(0)=1\eta(0)=\mathbf{1} and ξ(0)=0\xi(0)=0 (Step 6(v)), so that the integrand of φ0(u)\varphi_{0}(u) is the constant φ(u)\varphi(u).

Step 10 (Cylindrical reduction). Let G∈FCpol(X)G\in\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) have representation (n,φ,Bφ,q)(n,\varphi,B_{\varphi},q), let r≥0r\ge0 and x∈Xx\in X, and put u=pn(x)u=p_{n}(x). Then PrG(x)=φr(u)P_{r}G(x)=\varphi_{r}(u). Indeed, by The Mehler Maps and the Mehler Semigroup with Noise Weights on Continuous Cylindrical Functions of Polynomial Growth §map the kk-th coordinate of Mr(x,y)M_{r}(x,y) is ηk(r)xk+ξk(r)yk\eta_{k}(r)x_{k}+\xi_{k}(r)y_{k}, so pn(Mr(x,y))=η(r)⊙u+ξ(r)⊙pn(y)p_{n}(M_{r}(x,y))=\eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot p_{n}(y) and G(Mr(x,y))=g(pn(y))G(M_{r}(x,y))=g(p_{n}(y)) for the Borel function g(z)=φ(η(r)⊙u+ξ(r)⊙z)g(z)=\varphi(\eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot z), which is γn\gamma_{n}-integrable by Step 9. By the transfer rule of Step 2, the integral defining PrG(x)P_{r}G(x) in The Mehler Maps and the Mehler Semigroup with Noise Weights on Continuous Cylindrical Functions of Polynomial Growth §semigroup is ∫Xg(pny) γc(dy)=∫g dγn=φr(u)\int_{X}g(p_{n}y)\,\gamma_{c}(dy)=\int g\,d\gamma_{n}=\varphi_{r}(u).

Step 11 (Smoothing of bounded C1C^{1} functions). Let φ∈Cb1(Rn)\varphi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) (Bounded Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded), let C0,C1≥0C_{0},C_{1}\ge0 be real with ∣φ∣≤C0|\varphi|\le C_{0} and ∣∂kφ∣≤C1|\partial_{k}\varphi|\le C_{1} for k∈[n]k\in[n], and let r≥0r\ge0. Then φ\varphi and each ∂kφ\partial_{k}\varphi are of polynomial growth with constants (C0,0)(C_{0},0) and (C1,0)(C_{1},0), being continuous by clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set; and φr∈Cb1(Rn)\varphi_{r}\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), with ∣φr∣≤C0|\varphi_{r}|\le C_{0} and, for k∈[n]k\in[n],

∂k(φr)=ηk(r) (∂kφ)r,∣∂k(φr)∣≤C1.\partial_{k}(\varphi_{r})=\eta_{k}(r)\,(\partial_{k}\varphi)_{r},\qquad|\partial_{k}(\varphi_{r})|\le C_{1}.

Proof. Let G(v)=φ(η(r)⊙v)G(v)=\varphi(\eta(r)\odot v); by Step 4, GG is of class C1C^{1} with ∂kG(v)=ηk(r)∂kφ(η(r)⊙v)\partial_{k}G(v)=\eta_{k}(r)\partial_{k}\varphi(\eta(r)\odot v), so ∣G∣≤C|G|\le C and ∣∂kG∣≤C|\partial_{k}G|\le C with C=max⁡{C0,C1}C=\max\{C_{0},C_{1}\}. Let T(z)=−η(r)−1⊙ξ(r)⊙zT(z)=-\eta(r)^{-1}\odot\xi(r)\odot z, a Borel map (Step 3), and μ=T#γn\mu=T_{\#}\gamma_{n}, a probability measure on B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables. For u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and a bounded Borel H:Rn→RH:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}, claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables and claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space give ∫H(u−x) μ(dx)=∫H(u−T(z)) γn(dz)\int H(u-x)\,\mu(dx)=\int H(u-T(z))\,\gamma_{n}(dz), and η(r)⊙(u−T(z))=η(r)⊙u+ξ(r)⊙z\eta(r)\odot(u-T(z))=\eta(r)\odot u+\xi(r)\odot z. Hence, in the notation of The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral, (G∗μ)(u)=φr(u)(G*\mu)(u)=\varphi_{r}(u) and ((∂kG)∗μ)(u)=ηk(r)(∂kφ)r(u)((\partial_{k}G)*\mu)(u)=\eta_{k}(r)(\partial_{k}\varphi)_{r}(u). By The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral §derivative, φr=G∗μ\varphi_{r}=G*\mu is of class C1C^{1} with ∂k(φr)=(∂kG)∗μ=ηk(r)(∂kφ)r\partial_{k}(\varphi_{r})=(\partial_{k}G)*\mu=\eta_{k}(r)(\partial_{k}\varphi)_{r}. By The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral §continuous, applied to GG with the bound C0C_{0} and to v↦∂kφ(η(r)⊙v)v\mapsto\partial_{k}\varphi(\eta(r)\odot v) with the bound C1C_{1}, ∣φr∣≤C0|\varphi_{r}|\le C_{0} and ∣(∂kφ)r∣≤C1|(\partial_{k}\varphi)_{r}|\le C_{1}; and 0<ηk(r)≤10<\eta_{k}(r)\le1.

Claim 1. Common length. Let (n,ψ,B,q)(n,\psi,B,q) represent FF and let N≥nN\ge n be a natural number. If N>nN>n, let π:RN→Rn\pi:\mathbb{R}^{N}\to\mathbb{R}^{n} be the coordinate projection pr1n,N−n\mathrm{pr}^{n,N-n}_{1} of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §projections, which sends yy to (y1,…,yn)(y_{1},\dots,y_{n}) and satisfies ∥π(y)∥≤∥y∥\lVert\pi(y)\rVert\le\lVert y\rVert; it is affine, hence continuous (Step 3). Then pn=π∘pNp_{n}=\pi\circ p_{N}, so F=(ψ∘π)∘pNF=(\psi\circ\pi)\circ p_{N}, and ψ∘π\psi\circ\pi is continuous with ∣ψ(π(y))∣≤B(1+∥y∥q)|\psi(\pi(y))|\le B(1+\lVert y\rVert^{q}); thus (N,ψ∘π,B,q)(N,\psi\circ\pi,B,q) is a representation of FF. Consequently any two elements of FCpol(X)\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) have representations with the same first entry, the larger of two given ones.

Algebraic closure. Let (n,ψ,B,q)(n,\psi,B,q) and (n,χ,BG,qG)(n,\chi,B_{G},q_{G}) represent FF and GG, let α1∈R\alpha_{1}\in\mathbb{R}, and put Q=max⁡{q,qG}Q=\max\{q,q_{G}\}. Sums, products and real multiples of continuous functions are continuous (Step 3), and by (E4), ∣ψ+χ∣≤2(B+BG)(1+∥y∥Q)|\psi+\chi|\le2(B+B_{G})(1+\lVert y\rVert^{Q}), ∣ψχ∣≤4BBG(1+∥y∥q+qG)|\psi\chi|\le4BB_{G}(1+\lVert y\rVert^{q+q_{G}}) and ∣α1ψ∣≤∣α1∣B(1+∥y∥q)|\alpha_{1}\psi|\le|\alpha_{1}|B(1+\lVert y\rVert^{q}). So F+G=(ψ+χ)∘pnF+G=(\psi+\chi)\circ p_{n}, FG=(ψχ)∘pnFG=(\psi\chi)\circ p_{n} and α1F=(α1ψ)∘pn\alpha_{1}F=(\alpha_{1}\psi)\circ p_{n} belong to FCpol(X)\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X). The constant function with value α1\alpha_{1} is φ∘p1\varphi\circ p_{1} with φ\varphi the constant function α1\alpha_{1} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1}, so (1,φ,∣α1∣,0)(1,\varphi,|\alpha_{1}|,0) represents it.

Cylindrical classes. If φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) has representation (n,ψ)(n,\psi), then ψ∈Cb1(Rn)\psi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) is continuous by clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set and bounded by some real B≥0B\ge0 by Bounded Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded, so (n,ψ,B,0)(n,\psi,B,0) represents φ\varphi. Every element of FCb2(X)\mathcal{F}C^{2}_{b}(X) belongs to FCb1(X)\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) by The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Operator with Noise Weights on Bounded C^2 Cylindrical Functions §second-derivatives. For α∈A\alpha\in\mathcal{A} with length bound nn, Cylindrical Hermite Polynomials: Growth and Integrability, Partial Derivatives, Orthogonality, and Monomials as Hermite Combinations §cylindrical gives Hα=hα∘pnH_{\alpha}=h_{\alpha}\circ p_{n} with hα(y)=∏k=1nHαkck(yk)h_{\alpha}(y)=\prod_{k=1}^{n}H^{c_{k}}_{\alpha_{k}}(y_{k}) of class C2C^{2}, hence continuous, and ∣hα(y)∣≤M(1+∥y∥∣α∣)|h_{\alpha}(y)|\le M(1+\lVert y\rVert^{|\alpha|}), where M≥0M\ge0 because 0≤∣hα(0)∣≤M(1+∥0∥∣α∣)0\le|h_{\alpha}(0)|\le M(1+\lVert0\rVert^{|\alpha|}) and 1+∥0∥∣α∣>01+\lVert0\rVert^{|\alpha|}>0; so (n,hα,M,∣α∣)(n,h_{\alpha},M,|\alpha|) represents HαH_{\alpha}.

Continuity and integrability. With (n,ψ,B,q)(n,\psi,B,q) representing FF, F=ψ∘pnF=\psi\circ p_{n} is a composite of continuous maps (Step 2), hence continuous, and Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. Let p≥1p\ge1 be real and m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} with p≤mp\le m. Since ∥pnx∥≤∣x∣\lVert p_{n}x\rVert\le|x|, (E2) gives ∣F(x)∣≤2B(1+∣x∣2)q|F(x)|\le2B(1+|x|^{2})^{q}; so by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone, Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §product, Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §agreement and (E5) applied to (1+∣x∣2)q≥1(1+|x|^{2})^{q}\ge1,

∣F(x)∣p≤(2B)p((1+∣x∣2)q)p≤2(2B)p(1+∣x∣2)qm.|F(x)|^{p}\le(2B)^{p}\bigl((1+|x|^{2})^{q}\bigr)^{p}\le2(2B)^{p}(1+|x|^{2})^{qm}.

The function ∣F∣p|F|^{p} is measurable by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §measurable-power, and Step 2 with Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative gives ∫X∣F∣p dγc≤2(2B)pKqm<∞\int_{X}|F|^{p}\,d\gamma_{c}\le2(2B)^{p}K_{qm}<\infty; so F∈Lp(γc)F\in L^{p}(\gamma_{c}) by Gaussian Analysis Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure with Noise Weights: Standing Notation §lebesgue. The same argument shows that every Borel g:Rn→Rg:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} with ∣g(z)∣≤C(1+∥z∥q)|g(z)|\le C(1+\lVert z\rVert^{q}) satisfies ∫∣g∣p dγn≤2(2C)pKqm\int|g|^{p}\,d\gamma_{n}\le2(2C)^{p}K_{qm}, by Step 2.

Claim 2. Let (n,ψ,B,q)(n,\psi,B,q) represent FF. By Step 9 (with φ=ψ\varphi=\psi) the integrand is integrable, ψt\psi_{t} is continuous, and ∣ψr(u)∣≤B′(1+∥u∥q)|\psi_{r}(u)|\le B'(1+\lVert u\rVert^{q}) for every real r≥0r\ge0 and u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, with B′=2q+1BKqB'=2^{q+1}BK_{q}, which depends only on BB, qq and cc. By Step 10, PtF=ψt∘pnP_{t}F=\psi_{t}\circ p_{n}; so (n,ψt,B′,q)(n,\psi_{t},B',q) is a representation of PtF∈FCpol(X)P_{t}F\in\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X). By (9.4), P0F=ψ0∘pn=ψ∘pn=FP_{0}F=\psi_{0}\circ p_{n}=\psi\circ p_{n}=F. For F,G∈FCpol(X)F,G\in\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) and real α1,α2\alpha_{1},\alpha_{2}, α1F+α2G∈FCpol(X)\alpha_{1}F+\alpha_{2}G\in\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) by claim 1, and for x∈Xx\in X the functions y↦F(Mt(x,y))y\mapsto F(M_{t}(x,y)) and y↦G(Mt(x,y))y\mapsto G(M_{t}(x,y)) are γc\gamma_{c}-integrable by The Mehler Maps and the Mehler Semigroup with Noise Weights on Continuous Cylindrical Functions of Polynomial Growth §semigroup; so Pt(α1F+α2G)(x)=α1PtF(x)+α2PtG(x)P_{t}(\alpha_{1}F+\alpha_{2}G)(x)=\alpha_{1}P_{t}F(x)+\alpha_{2}P_{t}G(x) by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable. For the constant function with value α1\alpha_{1}, its image under PtP_{t} has the value ∫Xα1 γc(dy)=α1\int_{X}\alpha_{1}\,\gamma_{c}(dy)=\alpha_{1} at every xx, by claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, γc\gamma_{c} being a probability measure.

Claim 3. If s=0s=0 or t=0t=0, the claim follows from P0G=GP_{0}G=G for every G∈FCpol(X)G\in\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) (claim 2). Let s,t>0s,t>0 and let (n,ψ,B,q)(n,\psi,B,q) represent FF. By claim 2, (n,ψt,B′,q)(n,\psi_{t},B',q) represents PtFP_{t}F, so Ps(PtF)=(ψt)s∘pnP_{s}(P_{t}F)=(\psi_{t})_{s}\circ p_{n} by Step 10, and it suffices to show (ψt)s(u)=ψs+t(u)(\psi_{t})_{s}(u)=\psi_{s+t}(u) for u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. Put σ=ξ(s+t)\sigma=\xi(s+t), whose entries are positive by Step 6(v), a=σ−1⊙η(t)⊙ξ(s)\mathbf{a}=\sigma^{-1}\odot\eta(t)\odot\xi(s) and b=σ−1⊙ξ(t)\mathbf{b}=\sigma^{-1}\odot\xi(t); then bk>0\mathbf{b}_{k}>0 by Step 6(v) and ak2+bk2=1\mathbf{a}_{k}^{2}+\mathbf{b}_{k}^{2}=1 by Step 6(vi). Since η(t)⊙η(s)=η(s+t)\eta(t)\odot\eta(s)=\eta(s+t) by Step 6(vi), for all y,z∈Rny,z\in\mathbb{R}^{n}

η(t)⊙(η(s)⊙u+ξ(s)⊙y)+ξ(t)⊙z=η(s+t)⊙u+σ⊙(a⊙y+b⊙z).\eta(t)\odot\bigl(\eta(s)\odot u+\xi(s)\odot y\bigr)+\xi(t)\odot z=\eta(s+t)\odot u+\sigma\odot(\mathbf{a}\odot y+\mathbf{b}\odot z).

Let ϕ(w)=ψ(η(s+t)⊙u+σ⊙w)\phi(w)=\psi(\eta(s+t)\odot u+\sigma\odot w) and f(y,z)=ϕ(y)f(y,z)=\phi(y); by (9.1), ∣f(y,z)∣≤2qB(1+∥u∥q)(1+∥y∥q)(1+∥z∥q)|f(y,z)|\le2^{q}B(1+\lVert u\rVert^{q})(1+\lVert y\rVert^{q})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{q}). With SS the map of Step 7 for these a,b\mathbf{a},\mathbf{b}, f(S(y,z))=ϕ(a⊙y+b⊙z)f(S(y,z))=\phi(\mathbf{a}\odot y+\mathbf{b}\odot z), so by the displayed identity, Step 7(b) and claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space,

(ψt)s(u)=∫(∫f(S(y,z)) γn(dz))γn(dy)=∫(∫ϕ(y) γn(dz))γn(dy)=∫ϕ dγn=ψs+t(u).(\psi_{t})_{s}(u)=\int\Bigl(\int f(S(y,z))\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)=\int\Bigl(\int\phi(y)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)=\int\phi\,d\gamma_{n}=\psi_{s+t}(u).

Claim 4. Let (n,ψ,B,q)(n,\psi,B,q) represent FF. By claims 1 and 2 and the transfer rule, ∫XPtF dγc=∫ψt dγn\int_{X}P_{t}F\,d\gamma_{c}=\int\psi_{t}\,d\gamma_{n} and ∫XF dγc=∫ψ dγn\int_{X}F\,d\gamma_{c}=\int\psi\,d\gamma_{n}, all these integrals existing. For t=0t=0 there is nothing to prove. For t>0t>0, apply Step 7(b) with a=η(t)\mathbf{a}=\eta(t) and b=ξ(t)\mathbf{b}=\xi(t) (admissible by Step 6(v) and The Mehler Maps and the Mehler Semigroup with Noise Weights on Continuous Cylindrical Functions of Polynomial Growth §map) to f(y,z)=ψ(y)f(y,z)=\psi(y), for which ∣f(y,z)∣≤B(1+∥y∥q)(1+∥z∥q)|f(y,z)|\le B(1+\lVert y\rVert^{q})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{q}) and f(S(y,z))=ψ(η(t)⊙y+ξ(t)⊙z)f(S(y,z))=\psi(\eta(t)\odot y+\xi(t)\odot z):

∫ψt dγn=∫(∫f(S(y,z)) γn(dz))γn(dy)=∫(∫ψ(y) γn(dz))γn(dy)=∫ψ dγn,\int\psi_{t}\,d\gamma_{n}=\int\Bigl(\int f(S(y,z))\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)=\int\Bigl(\int\psi(y)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)=\int\psi\,d\gamma_{n},

the last step by claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space.

Claim 5. For x∈Xx\in X, PtF(x)P_{t}F(x) is the integral of the γc\gamma_{c}-integrable function y↦F(Mt(x,y))y\mapsto F(M_{t}(x,y)) (The Mehler Maps and the Mehler Semigroup with Noise Weights on Continuous Cylindrical Functions of Polynomial Growth §semigroup), which is nonnegative; so PtF(x)≥∫X0 dγc=0P_{t}F(x)\ge\int_{X}0\,d\gamma_{c}=0 by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable.

Claim 6. Let p≥1p\ge1 be real. For t=0t=0 there is nothing to prove; let t>0t>0 and let (n,ψ,B,q)(n,\psi,B,q) represent FF. Fix u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and let g(z)=ψ(η(t)⊙u+ξ(t)⊙z)g(z)=\psi(\eta(t)\odot u+\xi(t)\odot z), which by (9.1) and the last sentence of claim 1 is γn\gamma_{n}-integrable and satisfies ∫∣g∣p dγn<∞\int|g|^{p}\,d\gamma_{n}<\infty. We show

∣ψt(u)∣p≤∫∣g∣p dγn.(6.1)|\psi_{t}(u)|^{p}\le\int|g|^{p}\,d\gamma_{n}.\qquad(6.1)

For p=1p=1 this is Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable. For p>1p>1 let p′p' be its conjugate exponent; the constant function 11 has p′p'-seminorm (∫1p′dγn)1/p′=1(\int1^{p'}d\gamma_{n})^{1/p'}=1 (Step 1 and claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space), so Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable and Hoelder's Inequality, for Two and for Finitely Many Factors §holder give ∣ψt(u)∣≤∫∣g∣ dγn≤∥g∥p|\psi_{t}(u)|\le\int|g|\,d\gamma_{n}\le\lVert g\rVert_{p}, with the seminorm of Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §seminorm, and (6.1) follows by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone and Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §inverse. Now apply Step 7(a) with a=η(t)\mathbf{a}=\eta(t), b=ξ(t)\mathbf{b}=\xi(t) to the nonnegative measurable function f(y,z)=∣ψ(y)∣pf(y,z)=|\psi(y)|^{p} (Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §measurable-power), for which f(S(y,z))=∣ψ(η(t)⊙y+ξ(t)⊙z)∣pf(S(y,z))=|\psi(\eta(t)\odot y+\xi(t)\odot z)|^{p}. By claim 2, the transfer rule, (6.1), Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative, Step 7(a) and claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space,

∫X∣PtF∣p dγc=∫∣ψt∣p dγn≤∫(∫∣ψ(η(t)⊙y+ξ(t)⊙z)∣p γn(dz))γn(dy)=∫∣ψ∣p dγn=∫X∣F∣p dγc.\int_{X}|P_{t}F|^{p}\,d\gamma_{c}=\int|\psi_{t}|^{p}\,d\gamma_{n}\le\int\Bigl(\int|\psi(\eta(t)\odot y+\xi(t)\odot z)|^{p}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)=\int|\psi|^{p}\,d\gamma_{n}=\int_{X}|F|^{p}\,d\gamma_{c}.

Taking powers with exponent 1/p1/p (Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone) gives ∥PtF∥p≤∥F∥p\lVert P_{t}F\rVert_{p}\le\lVert F\rVert_{p}, by The Lebesgue Space of Power-Integrable Functions §norm and Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §seminorm.

Claim 7. By claims 1 and 2, G PtFG\,P_{t}F and F PtGF\,P_{t}G belong to FCpol(X)\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X), hence are γc\gamma_{c}-integrable. If t=0t=0 both equal FGFG. Let t>0t>0. By claim 1 choose representations (n,ψ,B,q)(n,\psi,B,q) of FF and (n,χ,BG,qG)(n,\chi,B_{G},q_{G}) of GG with the same nn. By claim 2 and the transfer rule, ∫XG PtF dγc=∫χ ψt dγn\int_{X}G\,P_{t}F\,d\gamma_{c}=\int\chi\,\psi_{t}\,d\gamma_{n} and ∫XF PtG dγc=∫ψ χt dγn\int_{X}F\,P_{t}G\,d\gamma_{c}=\int\psi\,\chi_{t}\,d\gamma_{n}. Let f(y,z)=χ(y) ψ(η(t)⊙y+ξ(t)⊙z)f(y,z)=\chi(y)\,\psi(\eta(t)\odot y+\xi(t)\odot z); by (9.1) and (E4), ∣f(y,z)∣≤K(1+∥y∥m)(1+∥z∥m)|f(y,z)|\le K(1+\lVert y\rVert^{m})(1+\lVert z\rVert^{m}) with m=q+qGm=q+q_{G} and K=2q+3BBGK=2^{q+3}BB_{G}. Let SS be the map of Step 7 for a=η(t)\mathbf{a}=\eta(t), b=ξ(t)\mathbf{b}=\xi(t). Since ηk(t)2+ξk(t)2=1\eta_{k}(t)^{2}+\xi_{k}(t)^{2}=1,

η(t)⊙(η(t)⊙y+ξ(t)⊙z)+ξ(t)⊙(ξ(t)⊙y−η(t)⊙z)=y,\eta(t)\odot\bigl(\eta(t)\odot y+\xi(t)\odot z\bigr)+\xi(t)\odot\bigl(\xi(t)\odot y-\eta(t)\odot z\bigr)=y,

so f(S(y,z))=χ(η(t)⊙y+ξ(t)⊙z) ψ(y)f(S(y,z))=\chi(\eta(t)\odot y+\xi(t)\odot z)\,\psi(y). Taking the factors ψ(y)\psi(y), respectively χ(y)\chi(y), out of the inner integrals (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable), Step 7(b) gives

∫ψ χt dγn=∫(∫f(S(y,z)) γn(dz))γn(dy)=∫(∫f(y,z) γn(dz))γn(dy)=∫χ ψt dγn.\int\psi\,\chi_{t}\,d\gamma_{n}=\int\Bigl(\int f(S(y,z))\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)=\int\Bigl(\int f(y,z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)\gamma_{n}(dy)=\int\chi\,\psi_{t}\,d\gamma_{n}.

Claim 8. Let α∈A\alpha\in\mathcal{A} have length bound nn (Finitely Supported Multi-Indices: Order, Factorial, Powers and Weighted Order §multi-indices). By claim 1, (n,hα,M,∣α∣)(n,h_{\alpha},M,|\alpha|) represents HαH_{\alpha}, where hα(y)=∏k=1nHαkck(yk)h_{\alpha}(y)=\prod_{k=1}^{n}H^{c_{k}}_{\alpha_{k}}(y_{k}), so PtHα=(hα)t∘pnP_{t}H_{\alpha}=(h_{\alpha})_{t}\circ p_{n} by claim 2. Fix u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and put gk(τ)=Hαkck(ηk(t)uk+ξk(t)τ)g_{k}(\tau)=H^{c_{k}}_{\alpha_{k}}(\eta_{k}(t)u_{k}+\xi_{k}(t)\tau) for τ∈R\tau\in\mathbb{R} and k∈[n]k\in[n]. Since ck>0c_{k}>0 and ηk(t)2+ξk(t)2=1\eta_{k}(t)^{2}+\xi_{k}(t)^{2}=1, Hermite Polynomials: Low Orders, Derivatives, Recursion, Scaling, the Addition Formula, Gaussian Orthogonality and the Mehler Identity §mehler, applied with v=ckv=c_{k}, r=ηk(t)r=\eta_{k}(t), s=ξk(t)s=\xi_{k}(t) and uku_{k} in place of the number written tt there, shows that gkg_{k} is Borel and γ(ck)\gamma_{(c_{k})}-integrable (so ∫∣gk∣ dγ(ck)<∞\int|g_{k}|\,d\gamma_{(c_{k})}<\infty by Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral) with ∫gk dγ(ck)=ηk(t)αkHαkck(uk)\int g_{k}\,d\gamma_{(c_{k})}=\eta_{k}(t)^{\alpha_{k}}H^{c_{k}}_{\alpha_{k}}(u_{k}). The integrand of (hα)t(u)(h_{\alpha})_{t}(u) is z↦∏kgk(zk)z\mapsto\prod_{k}g_{k}(z_{k}), so Step 8 gives

(hα)t(u)=∏k=1nηk(t)αkHαkck(uk)=exp⁡(−t∑k=1nαkθk)hα(u)=exp⁡(−t θ⋅α) hα(u),(h_{\alpha})_{t}(u)=\prod_{k=1}^{n}\eta_{k}(t)^{\alpha_{k}}H^{c_{k}}_{\alpha_{k}}(u_{k})=\exp\Bigl(-t\sum_{k=1}^{n}\alpha_{k}\theta_{k}\Bigr)h_{\alpha}(u)=\exp(-t\,\theta\cdot\alpha)\,h_{\alpha}(u),

using ηk(t)αk=exp⁡(−αkθkt)\eta_{k}(t)^{\alpha_{k}}=\exp(-\alpha_{k}\theta_{k}t) and ∏kexp⁡(bk)=exp⁡(∑kbk)\prod_{k}\exp(b_{k})=\exp(\sum_{k}b_{k}), both from claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function (with exp⁡(b)0=1=exp⁡(0)\exp(b)^{0}=1=\exp(0)), and Finitely Supported Multi-Indices: Order, Factorial, Powers and Weighted Order §order with the sequence θ\theta. Hence PtHα=exp⁡(−t θ⋅α) hα∘pn=exp⁡(−t θ⋅α) HαP_{t}H_{\alpha}=\exp(-t\,\theta\cdot\alpha)\,h_{\alpha}\circ p_{n}=\exp(-t\,\theta\cdot\alpha)\,H_{\alpha}.

Claim 9. Let F∈FCb1(X)F\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) have representation (n,ψ)(n,\psi), ψ∈Cb1(Rn)\psi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), and let C0,C1C_{0},C_{1} bound ∣ψ∣|\psi| and the ∣∂kψ∣|\partial_{k}\psi|, k∈[n]k\in[n]. By claim 1, (n,ψ,C0,0)(n,\psi,C_{0},0) represents FF, so PtF=ψt∘pnP_{t}F=\psi_{t}\circ p_{n} by claim 2, and ψt∈Cb1(Rn)\psi_{t}\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by Step 11; hence PtF∈FCb1(X)P_{t}F\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical, with representation (n,ψt)(n,\psi_{t}). Let k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. If k≤nk\le n, Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial gives ∂kF=(∂kψ)∘pn\partial_{k}F=(\partial_{k}\psi)\circ p_{n}, where ∂kψ\partial_{k}\psi is of polynomial growth with constants (C1,0)(C_{1},0) (Step 11); so ∂kF∈FCpol(X)\partial_{k}F\in\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) and Pt(∂kF)=(∂kψ)t∘pnP_{t}(\partial_{k}F)=(\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}\circ p_{n} by claim 2. Applying Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial to PtFP_{t}F with representation (n,ψt)(n,\psi_{t}), and Step 11,

∂k(PtF)=(∂kψt)∘pn=ηk(t) (∂kψ)t∘pn=exp⁡(−θkt) Pt(∂kF).\partial_{k}(P_{t}F)=(\partial_{k}\psi_{t})\circ p_{n}=\eta_{k}(t)\,(\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}\circ p_{n}=\exp(-\theta_{k}t)\,P_{t}(\partial_{k}F).

If k>nk>n, the same lemma gives ∂kF=0\partial_{k}F=0 and ∂k(PtF)=0\partial_{k}(P_{t}F)=0; the constant 00 lies in FCpol(X)\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X) and Pt0=0P_{t}0=0 by claims 1 and 2, so both sides of the identity vanish.

Claim 10. Let t>0t>0, let FF be bounded, and let (n,ψ,B,q)(n,\psi,B,q) represent FF. For u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n} the point pn∗(u)=∑k=1nukekp_{n}^{*}(u)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}u_{k}e_{k} of Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates satisfies pn(pn∗(u))=up_{n}(p_{n}^{*}(u))=u, by linearity of the inner product and orthonormality of (ek)(e_{k}) (Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §space); so ψ(u)=F(pn∗(u))\psi(u)=F(p_{n}^{*}(u)), and ∣ψ∣≤M0|\psi|\le M_{0} for some real M0≥0M_{0}\ge0.

Standardisation. For 0<s≤10<s\le1 let gsg_{s} be the Gaussian weight of The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails, read with nn in place of the dimension written qq there, so g1(w)=ϰexp⁡(−∥w∥2/2)g_{1}(w)=\varkappa\exp(-\lVert w\rVert^{2}/2), where ϰ\varkappa is the unique positive real number with ∫g1 dw=1\int g_{1}\,dw=1 (written c1c_{1} there). Let ς=(c1,…,cn)\varsigma=(\sqrt{c_{1}},\dots,\sqrt{c_{n}}) and β0=∏kck\beta_{0}=\prod_{k}\sqrt{c_{k}}. Since (ck wk)2/ck=wk2(\sqrt{c_{k}}\,w_{k})^{2}/c_{k}=w_{k}^{2}, The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §density, Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square and claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function give β0ρn(ς⊙w)=Cexp⁡(−∥w∥2/2)\beta_{0}\rho_{n}(\varsigma\odot w)=C\exp(-\lVert w\rVert^{2}/2) for a real C>0C>0 independent of ww. By the density rule and Step 5 (with a=0\mathbf{a}=0, b=ς\mathbf{b}=\varsigma), for every Borel ϕ:Rn→[0,∞)\phi:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to[0,\infty),

∫ϕ dγn=∫ϕρn dz=∫ϕ(ς⊙w) Cexp⁡(−∥w∥2/2) dw.\int\phi\,d\gamma_{n}=\int\phi\rho_{n}\,dz=\int\phi(\varsigma\odot w)\,C\exp(-\lVert w\rVert^{2}/2)\,dw .

With ϕ=1\phi=1 the left side is 11, so C=ϰC=\varkappa by the uniqueness just quoted; hence ∫ϕ dγn=∫ϕ(ς⊙w)g1(w) dw\int\phi\,d\gamma_{n}=\int\phi(\varsigma\odot w)g_{1}(w)\,dw, and, splitting ϕ=ϕ+−ϕ−\phi=\phi^{+}-\phi^{-} (Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral, Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable), the same holds for every γn\gamma_{n}-integrable Borel ϕ\phi, the right-hand integrand being then λn\lambda_{n}-integrable. (10.1)

Reduction to a Gaussian smoothing. Let D=ξ(t)⊙ςD=\xi(t)\odot\varsigma, whose entries are positive by Step 6(v), E=D−1⊙η(t)E=D^{-1}\odot\eta(t), and H(v)=ψ(D⊙v)H(v)=\psi(D\odot v), a continuous, hence Borel, function with ∣H∣≤M0|H|\le M_{0}. For u,w∈Rnu,w\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, η(t)⊙u+ξ(t)⊙ς⊙w=D⊙(E⊙u+w)\eta(t)\odot u+\xi(t)\odot\varsigma\odot w=D\odot(E\odot u+w), so by (10.1)

ψt(u)=∫H(E⊙u+w) g1(w) dw=∫H(E⊙u−x) g1(x) dx=H1(E⊙u),\psi_{t}(u)=\int H(E\odot u+w)\,g_{1}(w)\,dw=\int H(E\odot u-x)\,g_{1}(x)\,dx=H_{1}(E\odot u),

where the second equality is claim 3 of Translation and Reflection Invariance of Lebesgue Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n with a=0a=0, applied to the integrable function w↦H(E⊙u+w)g1(w)w\mapsto H(E\odot u+w)g_{1}(w), together with g1(−x)=g1(x)g_{1}(-x)=g_{1}(x) (The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §derivatives), and H1H_{1} is the smoothing of HH of Gaussian Smoothing of a Bounded Borel Function on Euclidean Space: the Two Forms, Derivatives through the Kernel and through the Function, and Pointwise Convergence §smoothing with s=1s=1.

H1∈Cb2(Rn)H_{1}\in C^{2}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}). Fix y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. By The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §convolution with s=12s=\tfrac12 and the evenness of g1/2g_{1/2} and g1g_{1}, g1(y−z)=∫g1/2(w−y) g1/2(w−z) dwg_{1}(y-z)=\int g_{1/2}(w-y)\,g_{1/2}(w-z)\,dw for every zz. The functions H+,H−H^{+},H^{-} are Borel with values in [0,M0][0,M_{0}]. Applying Tonelli and Fubini Theorems for λn⊗λn\lambda_{n}\otimes\lambda_{n} to the nonnegative measurable function (z,w)↦g1/2(w−y) g1/2(w−z) H±(z)(z,w)\mapsto g_{1/2}(w-y)\,g_{1/2}(w-z)\,H^{\pm}(z), with Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative, and then Gaussian Smoothing of a Bounded Borel Function on Euclidean Space: the Two Forms, Derivatives through the Kernel and through the Function, and Pointwise Convergence §smoothing (second form) with s=12s=\tfrac12,

∫g1(y−z) H±(z) dz=∫g1/2(w−y)(∫g1/2(w−z) H±(z) dz)dw=∫g1/2(y−w) (H±)1/2(w) dw,\int g_{1}(y-z)\,H^{\pm}(z)\,dz=\int g_{1/2}(w-y)\Bigl(\int g_{1/2}(w-z)\,H^{\pm}(z)\,dz\Bigr)dw=\int g_{1/2}(y-w)\,(H^{\pm})_{1/2}(w)\,dw,

all these quantities being finite by the same claim (the functions (H±)1/2(H^{\pm})_{1/2} are bounded by M0M_{0} and Borel, being continuous by Gaussian Smoothing of a Bounded Borel Function on Euclidean Space: the Two Forms, Derivatives through the Kernel and through the Function, and Pointwise Convergence §kernel-derivative). Subtracting the two identities and using Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable (so that (H+)1/2−(H−)1/2=H1/2(H^{+})_{1/2}-(H^{-})_{1/2}=H_{1/2}) gives H1(y)=∫g1/2(y−w) H1/2(w) dw=(H1/2)1/2(y)H_{1}(y)=\int g_{1/2}(y-w)\,H_{1/2}(w)\,dw=(H_{1/2})_{1/2}(y), the smoothing with s=12s=\tfrac12 of the Borel function H1/2H_{1/2}, which is bounded by M0M_{0}. By Gaussian Smoothing of a Bounded Borel Function on Euclidean Space: the Two Forms, Derivatives through the Kernel and through the Function, and Pointwise Convergence §kernel-derivative, H1/2H_{1/2} is of class C1C^{1} with ∣∂iH1/2∣≤M0n2|\partial_{i}H_{1/2}|\le M_{0}\sqrt{n}\sqrt{2}, so H1/2∈Cb1(Rn)H_{1/2}\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}). By Gaussian Smoothing of a Bounded Borel Function on Euclidean Space: the Two Forms, Derivatives through the Kernel and through the Function, and Pointwise Convergence §function-derivative, applied with H1/2H_{1/2} in place of HH, ∂iH1=(∂iH1/2)1/2\partial_{i}H_{1}=(\partial_{i}H_{1/2})_{1/2}, the smoothing of the bounded Borel function ∂iH1/2\partial_{i}H_{1/2}; by Gaussian Smoothing of a Bounded Borel Function on Euclidean Space: the Two Forms, Derivatives through the Kernel and through the Function, and Pointwise Convergence §smoothing and Gaussian Smoothing of a Bounded Borel Function on Euclidean Space: the Two Forms, Derivatives through the Kernel and through the Function, and Pointwise Convergence §kernel-derivative, applied with ∂iH1/2\partial_{i}H_{1/2} in place of HH, this function is bounded and of class C1C^{1} with bounded partial derivatives. Since H1H_{1} is of class C1C^{1} and bounded (same claims with s=1s=1), clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set shows that H1H_{1} is of class C2C^{2}, and H1∈Cb2(Rn)H_{1}\in C^{2}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by Bounded Twice Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded First and Second Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded.

Conclusion. Since ψt(u)=H1(E⊙u)\psi_{t}(u)=H_{1}(E\odot u), Step 4 (with a=0\mathbf{a}=0, b=E\mathbf{b}=E) shows that ψt\psi_{t} is of class C2C^{2} with ∂kψt(u)=Ek∂kH1(E⊙u)\partial_{k}\psi_{t}(u)=E_{k}\partial_{k}H_{1}(E\odot u) and ∂l∂kψt(u)=ElEk∂l∂kH1(E⊙u)\partial_{l}\partial_{k}\psi_{t}(u)=E_{l}E_{k}\partial_{l}\partial_{k}H_{1}(E\odot u), all bounded; so ψt∈Cb2(Rn)\psi_{t}\in C^{2}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), and PtF=ψt∘pn∈FCb2(X)P_{t}F=\psi_{t}\circ p_{n}\in\mathcal{F}C^{2}_{b}(X) by claim 2 and Bounded C^2 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical.

Claim 11. Let (n,ψ,B,q)(n,\psi,B,q) represent FF, let x∈Xx\in X and u=pn(x)u=p_{n}(x). By claim 2, PrF(x)=ψr(u)P_{r}F(x)=\psi_{r}(u) for every real r≥0r\ge0, and r↦ψr(u)r\mapsto\psi_{r}(u) is continuous on [0,∞)[0,\infty) by (9.3); this is the first assertion. Let p≥1p\ge1 be real, m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} with p≤mp\le m, and let (rm′)m′∈N(r_{m'})_{m'\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in [0,∞)[0,\infty) converging to tt. The functions fm′=∣Prm′F−PtF∣pf_{m'}=|P_{r_{m'}}F-P_{t}F|^{p} on XX are measurable (Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §measurable-power) and converge to 00 at every point, by the first assertion and Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §continuity. By claim 2, ∣Prm′F(x′)−PtF(x′)∣≤2B′(1+∥pnx′∥q)≤4B′(1+∣x′∣2)q|P_{r_{m'}}F(x')-P_{t}F(x')|\le2B'(1+\lVert p_{n}x'\rVert^{q})\le4B'(1+|x'|^{2})^{q} for x′∈Xx'\in X, using (E2); so, as in claim 1, fm′(x′)≤2(4B′)p(1+∣x′∣2)qmf_{m'}(x')\le2(4B')^{p}(1+|x'|^{2})^{qm}, which is γc\gamma_{c}-integrable by Step 2. By Dominated Convergence Theorem, ∫Xfm′ dγc→0\int_{X}f_{m'}\,d\gamma_{c}\to0. Now suppose that ∥PrF−PtF∥p\lVert P_{r}F-P_{t}F\rVert_{p} did not tend to 00 as r→tr\to t over r≥0r\ge0, the difference belonging to Lp(γc)L^{p}(\gamma_{c}) by claims 1 and 2. Then there would be ε>0\varepsilon>0 and, for each m′∈Nm'\in\mathbb{N}, a real rm′≥0r_{m'}\ge0 with ∣rm′−t∣<1/m′|r_{m'}-t|<1/m' and ∥Prm′F−PtF∥p≥ε\lVert P_{r_{m'}}F-P_{t}F\rVert_{p}\ge\varepsilon, that is, ∫Xfm′ dγc≥εp\int_{X}f_{m'}\,d\gamma_{c}\ge\varepsilon^{p} by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §seminorm, Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone and Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §inverse; since rm′→tr_{m'}\to t, this contradicts what was just shown.

Claim 12. Let F∈FCb2(X)F\in\mathcal{F}C^{2}_{b}(X), F=ψ∘pnF=\psi\circ p_{n} with ψ∈Cb2(Rn)\psi\in C^{2}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) (Bounded C^2 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical), and let M0,M1,M2≥0M_{0},M_{1},M_{2}\ge0 be real bounds of ∣ψ∣|\psi|, of the ∣∂kψ∣|\partial_{k}\psi| and of the ∣∂l∂kψ∣|\partial_{l}\partial_{k}\psi| (k,l∈[n]k,l\in[n]). By clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, each ∂kψ\partial_{k}\psi is of class C1C^{1}, and it is bounded with bounded partial derivatives, so ∂kψ∈Cb1(Rn)\partial_{k}\psi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}); and (n,ψ,M0,0)(n,\psi,M_{0},0) represents FF (claim 1).

(a) PtF∈FCb2(X)P_{t}F\in\mathcal{F}C^{2}_{b}(X). By Step 11 applied to ψ\psi and to each ∂kψ\partial_{k}\psi, ψt\psi_{t} is of class C1C^{1} with ∂kψt=ηk(t)(∂kψ)t\partial_{k}\psi_{t}=\eta_{k}(t)(\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}, and (∂kψ)t(\partial_{k}\psi)_{t} is of class C1C^{1} with ∂l(∂kψ)t=ηl(t)(∂l∂kψ)t\partial_{l}(\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}=\eta_{l}(t)(\partial_{l}\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}, these functions being bounded by M0M_{0}, M1M_{1} and M1M_{1} (Step 11), and ∣(∂l∂kψ)t∣≤M2|(\partial_{l}\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}|\le M_{2} by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable. Hence each ∂kψt\partial_{k}\psi_{t} is of class C1C^{1}, ψt\psi_{t} is of class C2C^{2} by clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, with

∂l∂kψt=ηl(t)ηk(t) (∂l∂kψ)t,(12.1)\partial_{l}\partial_{k}\psi_{t}=\eta_{l}(t)\eta_{k}(t)\,(\partial_{l}\partial_{k}\psi)_{t},\qquad(12.1)

and ψt∈Cb2(Rn)\psi_{t}\in C^{2}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}). Since PtF=ψt∘pnP_{t}F=\psi_{t}\circ p_{n} (claim 2), PtF∈FCb2(X)P_{t}F\in\mathcal{F}C^{2}_{b}(X).

(b) The operator in cylindrical form. For φ∈Cb2(Rn)\varphi\in C^{2}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) put Λφ(v)=∑k=1nak(∂k∂kφ(v)−ck−1vk ∂kφ(v))\Lambda\varphi(v)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\bigl(\partial_{k}\partial_{k}\varphi(v)-c_{k}^{-1}v_{k}\,\partial_{k}\varphi(v)\bigr). Then La(φ∘pn)=(Λφ)∘pnL^{a}(\varphi\circ p_{n})=(\Lambda\varphi)\circ p_{n}: for k≤nk\le n, Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial gives ∂k(φ∘pn)=(∂kφ)∘pn\partial_{k}(\varphi\circ p_{n})=(\partial_{k}\varphi)\circ p_{n}, which belongs to FCb1(X)\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) with representation (n,∂kφ)(n,\partial_{k}\varphi) by The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Operator with Noise Weights on Bounded C^2 Cylindrical Functions §second-derivatives, so the same lemma gives ∂k∂k(φ∘pn)=(∂k∂kφ)∘pn\partial_{k}\partial_{k}(\varphi\circ p_{n})=(\partial_{k}\partial_{k}\varphi)\circ p_{n}; since xkx_{k} is the kk-th entry of pn(x)p_{n}(x), The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Operator with Noise Weights on Bounded C^2 Cylindrical Functions §operator (with the pair (n,φ)(n,\varphi)) gives the formula. The function Λψ\Lambda\psi is continuous, and by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §coordinate, ∣Λψ(v)∣≤CΛ(1+∥v∥)|\Lambda\psi(v)|\le C_{\Lambda}(1+\lVert v\rVert) with CΛ=∑kak(M2+ck−1M1)C_{\Lambda}=\sum_{k}a_{k}(M_{2}+c_{k}^{-1}M_{1}). So (n,Λψ,CΛ,1)(n,\Lambda\psi,C_{\Lambda},1) represents LaF=(Λψ)∘pnL^{a}F=(\Lambda\psi)\circ p_{n}; thus LaF∈FCpol(X)L^{a}F\in\mathcal{F}C_{\mathrm{pol}}(X), Pt(LaF)=(Λψ)t∘pnP_{t}(L^{a}F)=(\Lambda\psi)_{t}\circ p_{n} by claim 2, and La(PtF)=(Λψt)∘pnL^{a}(P_{t}F)=(\Lambda\psi_{t})\circ p_{n} by (a).

(c) Commutation. Fix u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, write ηk=ηk(t)\eta_{k}=\eta_{k}(t), ξk=ξk(t)\xi_{k}=\xi_{k}(t) and w(z)=η(t)⊙u+ξ(t)⊙zw(z)=\eta(t)\odot u+\xi(t)\odot z. For k∈[n]k\in[n] let fk(z)=∂kψ(w(z))f_{k}(z)=\partial_{k}\psi(w(z)); by Step 4, fkf_{k} is of class C1C^{1} with ∂ifk(z)=ξi ∂i∂kψ(w(z))\partial_{i}f_{k}(z)=\xi_{i}\,\partial_{i}\partial_{k}\psi(w(z)), so ∣∂ifk(z)∣≤M2≤M2(1+∥z∥)|\partial_{i}f_{k}(z)|\le M_{2}\le M_{2}(1+\lVert z\rVert). Hence Gaussian Integration by Parts for Functions of Finitely Many Coordinates Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §coordinate, applied with fkf_{k} in place of ψ\psi and i=ki=k, together with the transfer rule of Step 2 (the kk-th entry of pn(x)p_{n}(x) being xkx_{k}), gives

∫zk fk(z) γn(dz)=ck∫∂kfk dγn=ck ξk (∂k∂kψ)t(u).\int z_{k}\,f_{k}(z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=c_{k}\int\partial_{k}f_{k}\,d\gamma_{n}=c_{k}\,\xi_{k}\,(\partial_{k}\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}(u).

The kk-th entry of w(z)w(z) is ηkuk+ξkzk\eta_{k}u_{k}+\xi_{k}z_{k}, and the functions z↦∂k∂kψ(w(z))z\mapsto\partial_{k}\partial_{k}\psi(w(z)), fkf_{k} and z↦zkfk(z)z\mapsto z_{k}f_{k}(z) are γn\gamma_{n}-integrable (the first two being bounded, the third bounded by M1∣zk∣M_{1}|z_{k}|; Step 2). So by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable, 1−ξk2=ηk21-\xi_{k}^{2}=\eta_{k}^{2}, Step 11 and (12.1),

(Λψ)t(u)=∑k=1nak((∂k∂kψ)t(u)−ηkukck(∂kψ)t(u)−ξkck∫zkfk(z) γn(dz))=∑k=1nak(ηk2(∂k∂kψ)t(u)−ukck ηk(∂kψ)t(u))=Λψt(u).(\Lambda\psi)_{t}(u)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\Bigl((\partial_{k}\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}(u)-\frac{\eta_{k}u_{k}}{c_{k}}(\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}(u)-\frac{\xi_{k}}{c_{k}}\int z_{k}f_{k}(z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\Bigr)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\Bigl(\eta_{k}^{2}(\partial_{k}\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}(u)-\frac{u_{k}}{c_{k}}\,\eta_{k}(\partial_{k}\psi)_{t}(u)\Bigr)=\Lambda\psi_{t}(u).

By (b), La(PtF)=Pt(LaF)L^{a}(P_{t}F)=P_{t}(L^{a}F).

(d) An expansion. Write Θ=Θn\Theta=\Theta_{n}. For real hh with 0<h≤10<h\le1 and v,z∈Rnv,z\in\mathbb{R}^{n} put dh(v,z)=(η(h)−1)⊙v+ξ(h)⊙zd_{h}(v,z)=(\eta(h)-\mathbf{1})\odot v+\xi(h)\odot z, so that η(h)⊙v+ξ(h)⊙z=v+dh(v,z)\eta(h)\odot v+\xi(h)\odot z=v+d_{h}(v,z). By Step 6(iii), ∣ηk(h)−1∣≤Θh|\eta_{k}(h)-1|\le\Theta h and ξk(h)2≤2Θh\xi_{k}(h)^{2}\le2\Theta h, so by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square and claim 5 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities

∥dh(v,z)∥2≤2Θ2h2∥v∥2+4Θh∥z∥2.(12.2)\lVert d_{h}(v,z)\rVert^{2}\le2\Theta^{2}h^{2}\lVert v\rVert^{2}+4\Theta h\lVert z\rVert^{2}.\qquad(12.2)

As γn\gamma_{n} is a probability measure, ψh(v)−ψ(v)=∫(ψ(v+dh(v,z))−ψ(v))γn(dz)\psi_{h}(v)-\psi(v)=\int\bigl(\psi(v+d_{h}(v,z))-\psi(v)\bigr)\gamma_{n}(dz). With d=dh(v,z)d=d_{h}(v,z) define

Rh(v,z)=ψ(v+d)−ψ(v)−∑i=1n∂iψ(v) di−12∑i,j=1n∂j∂iψ(v) didj.R_{h}(v,z)=\psi(v+d)-\psi(v)-\sum_{i=1}^{n}\partial_{i}\psi(v)\,d_{i}-\frac12\sum_{i,j=1}^{n}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi(v)\,d_{i}d_{j}.

By Step 2, ∫di γn(dz)=(ηi(h)−1)vi\int d_{i}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=(\eta_{i}(h)-1)v_{i} and ∫didj γn(dz)=(ηi(h)−1)(ηj(h)−1)vivj+ϵijξi(h)2ci\int d_{i}d_{j}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=(\eta_{i}(h)-1)(\eta_{j}(h)-1)v_{i}v_{j}+\epsilon_{ij}\xi_{i}(h)^{2}c_{i}, where ϵij=1\epsilon_{ij}=1 if i=ji=j and 00 otherwise. Hence, Rh(v,⋅)R_{h}(v,\cdot) being integrable as a combination of integrable functions,

ψh(v)−ψ(v)h=∑iηi(h)−1h vi ∂iψ(v)+12∑i,j(ηi(h)−1)(ηj(h)−1)h vivj ∂j∂iψ(v)+12∑iξi(h)2h ci ∂i∂iψ(v)+1h∫Rh(v,z) γn(dz).(12.3)\frac{\psi_{h}(v)-\psi(v)}{h}=\sum_{i}\frac{\eta_{i}(h)-1}{h}\,v_{i}\,\partial_{i}\psi(v)+\frac12\sum_{i,j}\frac{(\eta_{i}(h)-1)(\eta_{j}(h)-1)}{h}\,v_{i}v_{j}\,\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi(v)+\frac12\sum_{i}\frac{\xi_{i}(h)^{2}}{h}\,c_{i}\,\partial_{i}\partial_{i}\psi(v)+\frac1h\int R_{h}(v,z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz).\qquad(12.3)

By Multivariate Taylor Expansion with Uniform Second-Order Remainder, part (iii) with εˉ=2M2\bar{\varepsilon}=2M_{2} (the segment lying in W=RnW=\mathbb{R}^{n}),

∣Rh(v,z)∣≤n M2 ∥dh(v,z)∥2,(12.4)|R_{h}(v,z)|\le n\,M_{2}\,\lVert d_{h}(v,z)\rVert^{2},\qquad(12.4)

and by part (ii), integrated with Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable, (12.2) and Step 2, ∣ψh(v)−ψ(v)−∑i(ηi(h)−1)vi∂iψ(v)∣≤12nM2(2Θ2h2∥v∥2+4ΘhK1)\bigl|\psi_{h}(v)-\psi(v)-\sum_{i}(\eta_{i}(h)-1)v_{i}\partial_{i}\psi(v)\bigr|\le\frac12nM_{2}(2\Theta^{2}h^{2}\lVert v\rVert^{2}+4\Theta hK_{1}); with ∣vi∣≤∥v∥≤1+∥v∥2|v_{i}|\le\lVert v\rVert\le1+\lVert v\rVert^{2} and h≤1h\le1 this gives

∣ψh(v)−ψ(v)∣≤C∗ h (1+∥v∥2),C∗=nΘM1+nM2Θ2+2nM2ΘK1.(12.5)|\psi_{h}(v)-\psi(v)|\le C_{*}\,h\,(1+\lVert v\rVert^{2}),\qquad C_{*}=n\Theta M_{1}+nM_{2}\Theta^{2}+2nM_{2}\Theta K_{1}.\qquad(12.5)

(e) Convergence of difference quotients. Let (hm)(h_{m}) be a sequence in (0,1](0,1] converging to 00 and (vm)(v_{m}) a sequence in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} converging to vv. Then (ψhm(vm)−ψ(vm))/hm→Λψ(v)(\psi_{h_{m}}(v_{m})-\psi(v_{m}))/h_{m}\to\Lambda\psi(v). Indeed, use (12.3) with (hm,vm)(h_{m},v_{m}). By Step 6(iii), (ηi(hm)−1)/hm→−θi(\eta_{i}(h_{m})-1)/h_{m}\to-\theta_{i} and ξi(hm)2/hm→2θi\xi_{i}(h_{m})^{2}/h_{m}\to2\theta_{i}, and ∣(ηi(hm)−1)(ηj(hm)−1)∣/hm≤Θ2hm→0|(\eta_{i}(h_{m})-1)(\eta_{j}(h_{m})-1)|/h_{m}\le\Theta^{2}h_{m}\to0; the entries of vmv_{m} converge to those of vv; and ∂iψ\partial_{i}\psi, ∂j∂iψ\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi are continuous (Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §sequential). So the first three terms of (12.3) converge to ∑i(−θivi∂iψ(v)+θici∂i∂iψ(v))=Λψ(v)\sum_{i}\bigl(-\theta_{i}v_{i}\partial_{i}\psi(v)+\theta_{i}c_{i}\partial_{i}\partial_{i}\psi(v)\bigr)=\Lambda\psi(v), because θici=ai\theta_{i}c_{i}=a_{i} and θi=ai/ci\theta_{i}=a_{i}/c_{i} by Gaussian Analysis Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure with Noise Weights: Standing Notation §rates. For the last term let VV be a real bound of the ∥vm∥\lVert v_{m}\rVert, and let ε>0\varepsilon>0. By continuity of the finitely many functions ∂j∂iψ\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi at vv there is ϱ>0\varrho>0 with ∣∂j∂iψ(y)−∂j∂iψ(v)∣≤ε/2|\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi(y)-\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi(v)|\le\varepsilon/2 whenever ∥y−v∥<ϱ\lVert y-v\rVert<\varrho. Fix zz and put dm=dhm(vm,z)d_{m}=d_{h_{m}}(v_{m},z); by (12.2), ∥dm∥2≤(2Θ2V2+4Θ∥z∥2)hm→0\lVert d_{m}\rVert^{2}\le(2\Theta^{2}V^{2}+4\Theta\lVert z\rVert^{2})h_{m}\to0, so there is m0m_{0} with ∥vm−v∥<ϱ/2\lVert v_{m}-v\rVert<\varrho/2 and ∥dm∥<ϱ/2\lVert d_{m}\rVert<\varrho/2 for m≥m0m\ge m_{0}. For such mm every point of the segment from vmv_{m} to vm+dmv_{m}+d_{m} lies within ϱ\varrho of vv, so ∣∂j∂iψ(y)−∂j∂iψ(vm)∣≤ε|\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi(y)-\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi(v_{m})|\le\varepsilon on it, and part (iii) of Multivariate Taylor Expansion with Uniform Second-Order Remainder with εˉ=ε\bar{\varepsilon}=\varepsilon gives ∣Rhm(vm,z)∣/hm≤12nε(2Θ2V2+4Θ∥z∥2)|R_{h_{m}}(v_{m},z)|/h_{m}\le\frac12n\varepsilon(2\Theta^{2}V^{2}+4\Theta\lVert z\rVert^{2}). As ε\varepsilon was arbitrary, Rhm(vm,z)/hm→0R_{h_{m}}(v_{m},z)/h_{m}\to0 for every zz. By (12.4) and (12.2), ∣Rhm(vm,z)∣/hm≤nM2(2Θ2V2+4Θ∥z∥2)|R_{h_{m}}(v_{m},z)|/h_{m}\le nM_{2}(2\Theta^{2}V^{2}+4\Theta\lVert z\rVert^{2}), which is γn\gamma_{n}-integrable by Step 2; so Dominated Convergence Theorem gives 1hm∫Rhm(vm,z) γn(dz)→0\frac{1}{h_{m}}\int R_{h_{m}}(v_{m},z)\,\gamma_{n}(dz)\to0.

(f) The derivative. Let x∈Xx\in X, u=pn(x)u=p_{n}(x), and let h≠0h\ne0 be real with t+h≥0t+h\ge0 and ∣h∣≤1|h|\le1; put sh=min⁡{t,t+h}≥0s_{h}=\min\{t,t+h\}\ge0. If h>0h>0, claim 3 (with tt, hh in place of ss, tt) and the linearity in claim 2 give Pt+hF−PtF=Pt(PhF)−PtF=Pt(PhF−F)P_{t+h}F-P_{t}F=P_{t}(P_{h}F)-P_{t}F=P_{t}(P_{h}F-F); if h<0h<0, claim 3 gives PtF=Pt+h(P∣h∣F)P_{t}F=P_{t+h}(P_{|h|}F), so Pt+hF−PtF=−Pt+h(P∣h∣F−F)P_{t+h}F-P_{t}F=-P_{t+h}(P_{|h|}F-F). In both cases Pt+hF−PtF=h∣h∣Psh(P∣h∣F−F)P_{t+h}F-P_{t}F=\frac{h}{|h|}P_{s_{h}}(P_{|h|}F-F). The function Qh=(ψ∣h∣−ψ)/∣h∣Q_{h}=(\psi_{|h|}-\psi)/|h| is continuous and, by (12.5), of polynomial growth with constants (C∗,2)(C_{*},2); as P∣h∣F−F=∣h∣ Qh∘pnP_{|h|}F-F=|h|\,Q_{h}\circ p_{n} by claim 2, Step 10 and (9.4) give

Pt+hF(x)−PtF(x)h=∫Qh(η(sh)⊙u+ξ(sh)⊙z) γn(dz).(12.6)\frac{P_{t+h}F(x)-P_{t}F(x)}{h}=\int Q_{h}\bigl(\eta(s_{h})\odot u+\xi(s_{h})\odot z\bigr)\,\gamma_{n}(dz).\qquad(12.6)

Let (hm)(h_{m}) be a sequence of such numbers converging to 00. Then shm→ts_{h_{m}}\to t, and for each zz the points vm(z)=η(shm)⊙u+ξ(shm)⊙zv_{m}(z)=\eta(s_{h_{m}})\odot u+\xi(s_{h_{m}})\odot z converge to v(z)=η(t)⊙u+ξ(t)⊙zv(z)=\eta(t)\odot u+\xi(t)\odot z by Step 6(iv); so (e), applied with ∣hm∣|h_{m}| in place of hmh_{m}, gives Qhm(vm(z))→Λψ(v(z))Q_{h_{m}}(v_{m}(z))\to\Lambda\psi(v(z)). By (12.5), Step 1 and claim 5 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities, ∣Qhm(vm(z))∣≤C∗(1+(∥u∥+∥z∥)2)≤C∗(1+2∥u∥2+2∥z∥2)|Q_{h_{m}}(v_{m}(z))|\le C_{*}(1+(\lVert u\rVert+\lVert z\rVert)^{2})\le C_{*}(1+2\lVert u\rVert^{2}+2\lVert z\rVert^{2}), which is γn\gamma_{n}-integrable by Step 2. By Dominated Convergence Theorem, the quotients (12.6) along (hm)(h_{m}) converge to ∫Λψ(v(z)) γn(dz)=(Λψ)t(u)=Pt(LaF)(x)\int\Lambda\psi(v(z))\,\gamma_{n}(dz)=(\Lambda\psi)_{t}(u)=P_{t}(L^{a}F)(x), by (b). Finally, if the limit in claim 12 failed, there would be ε>0\varepsilon>0 and, for each m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}, a real hm≠0h_{m}\ne0 with ∣hm∣<1/m|h_{m}|<1/m and t+hm≥0t+h_{m}\ge0 whose difference quotient differs from Pt(LaF)(x)P_{t}(L^{a}F)(x) by at least ε\varepsilon; as hm→0h_{m}\to0, this contradicts what was just shown. Hence

lim⁡h→0Pt+hF(x)−PtF(x)h=Pt(LaF)(x).\lim_{h\to0}\frac{P_{t+h}F(x)-P_{t}F(x)}{h}=P_{t}(L^{a}F)(x).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…