TheoremBase

Proof of Small Cases, Reduction, and Membership for Convex Combinations

lemmalem:convex-combination-properties-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of the small cases, the reduction of an (N+1)-term convex combination to a binary one, and membership of convex combinations in a convex set.

Proof

Sums of real numbers are the finite sums of the field R\mathbb{R}, and coordinates of convex combinations are as in Convex Combination of Finitely Many Points of Rn\mathbb{R}^n. Write SS for the successor map of Natural Numbers; by Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers we have p+1=S(p)p+1=S(p) for every natural number pp, so claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums may be applied in the form βˆ‘k=1p+1ak=βˆ‘k=1pak+ap+1\sum_{k=1}^{p+1}a_k=\sum_{k=1}^{p}a_k+a_{p+1}. Record that 0 t=00\,t=0 for every t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}, since 0 t=(0+0) t=0 t+0 t0\,t=(0+0)\,t=0\,t+0\,t by distributivity and claim 2 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field applies.

Claim 1. Let tt be a system of convex weights of length 11. By claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums, βˆ‘k=11tk=t1\sum_{k=1}^{1}t_k=t_1, so t1=1t_1=1; and for j∈[n]j\in[n] the same claim gives (βˆ‘k=11tkxk)j=t1 (x1)j=(x1)j\bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{1}t_kx_k\bigr)_j=t_1\,(x_1)_j=(x_1)_j. Hence βˆ‘k=11tkxk=x1\sum_{k=1}^{1}t_kx_k=x_1.

Let uu be a system of convex weights of length 22. By claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums, 1=βˆ‘k=12uk=u1+u21=\sum_{k=1}^{2}u_k=u_1+u_2, so, by commutativity and associativity of addition together with claims 3 and 4 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, u2=(u1+u2)βˆ’u1=1βˆ’u1u_2=(u_1+u_2)-u_1=1-u_1. For j∈[n]j\in[n] the same claim gives

(βˆ‘k=12ukyk)j=u1 (y1)j+u2 (y2)j,\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{2}u_ky_k\Bigr)_j=u_1\,(y_1)_j+u_2\,(y_2)_j ,

which by Sum of Points of Rn\mathbb{R}^n and Scalar Multiple of a Point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n is the jjth coordinate of u1y1+u2y2u_1y_1+u_2y_2. Hence βˆ‘k=12ukyk=u1y1+(1βˆ’u1)y2\sum_{k=1}^{2}u_ky_k=u_1y_1+(1-u_1)y_2.

Claim 2. By claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums, in its restriction part and its recursion part,

1=βˆ‘k=1N+1tk=βˆ‘k=1Ntkβ€²+tN+1=s+tN+1,1=\sum_{k=1}^{N+1}t_k=\sum_{k=1}^{N}t'_k+t_{N+1}=s+t_{N+1},

so s=1βˆ’tN+1s=1-t_{N+1} as in the computation of u2u_2 above. Since 0≀tk0\le t_k for every k∈[N+1]k\in[N+1], claim 5 of Properties of Finite Sums gives 0≀s0\le s, and claim 6 of that lemma gives tN+1≀1t_{N+1}\le1; since 1βˆ’s=tN+11-s=t_{N+1} is nonnegative, claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives s≀1s\le1.

For j∈[n]j\in[n], claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums also gives

(βˆ‘k=1N+1tkxk)j=βˆ‘k=1Ntk′ (xkβ€²)j+tN+1 (xN+1)j.(βˆ—)\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{N+1}t_kx_k\Bigr)_j=\sum_{k=1}^{N}t'_k\,(x'_k)_j+t_{N+1}\,(x_{N+1})_j . \tag{$*$}

(a) Suppose tN+1=1t_{N+1}=1. Then s=1βˆ’1=0s=1-1=0, so claim 5 of Properties of Finite Sums forces tkβ€²=0t'_k=0 for every k∈[N]k\in[N]. Every summand of βˆ‘k=1Ntkβ€²(xkβ€²)j\sum_{k=1}^{N}t'_k(x'_k)_j is then 0 (xkβ€²)j=00\,(x'_k)_j=0, so that sum equals 00 by claim 7 of Properties of Finite Sums. By (βˆ—)(*), the jjth coordinate of βˆ‘k=1N+1tkxk\sum_{k=1}^{N+1}t_kx_k is (xN+1)j(x_{N+1})_j for every j∈[n]j\in[n], that is, βˆ‘k=1N+1tkxk=xN+1\sum_{k=1}^{N+1}t_kx_k=x_{N+1}.

(b) Suppose tN+1β‰ 1t_{N+1}\ne1. With tN+1≀1t_{N+1}\le1 this gives tN+1<1t_{N+1}<1, so 0<1βˆ’tN+1=s0<1-t_{N+1}=s by claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. By claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, sβˆ’1s^{-1} exists and 0<sβˆ’10<s^{-1}, so Ο„k=sβˆ’1tkβ€²\tau_k=s^{-1}t'_k satisfies 0≀τk0\le\tau_k by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and s τk=s (sβˆ’1tkβ€²)=tkβ€²s\,\tau_k=s\,(s^{-1}t'_k)=t'_k by associativity. By claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums,

βˆ‘k=1NΟ„k=sβˆ’1βˆ‘k=1Ntkβ€²=sβˆ’1s=1,\sum_{k=1}^{N}\tau_k=s^{-1}\sum_{k=1}^{N}t'_k=s^{-1}s=1,

so Ο„\tau is a system of convex weights of length NN and the convex combination y=βˆ‘k=1NΟ„kxkβ€²y=\sum_{k=1}^{N}\tau_kx'_k is defined. Using tkβ€²=s τkt'_k=s\,\tau_k and claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums again,

βˆ‘k=1Ntk′ (xkβ€²)j=sβˆ‘k=1NΟ„k (xkβ€²)j=s yj.\sum_{k=1}^{N}t'_k\,(x'_k)_j=s\sum_{k=1}^{N}\tau_k\,(x'_k)_j=s\,y_j .

Substituting into (βˆ—)(*) and using tN+1=1βˆ’st_{N+1}=1-s shows that the jjth coordinate of βˆ‘k=1N+1tkxk\sum_{k=1}^{N+1}t_kx_k equals s yj+(1βˆ’s) (xN+1)js\,y_j+(1-s)\,(x_{N+1})_j, which by Sum of Points of Rn\mathbb{R}^n and Scalar Multiple of a Point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n is the jjth coordinate of s y+(1βˆ’s) xN+1s\,y+(1-s)\,x_{N+1}. This proves (b).

Claim 3. We use the induction principle for the natural numbers. Let P\mathcal{P} be the set of natural numbers NN with 1≀N1\le N such that, for every convex CβŠ†RnC\subseteq\mathbb{R}^n, every x:[N]β†’Rnx:[N]\to\mathbb{R}^n taking all of its values in CC and every system of convex weights tt of length NN, the combination βˆ‘k=1Ntkxk\sum_{k=1}^{N}t_kx_k lies in CC.

By claim 1 the combination for N=1N=1 is x1x_1, which lies in CC; so 1∈P1\in\mathcal{P}.

Suppose N∈PN\in\mathcal{P}, and let CC, a map x:[N+1]β†’Rnx:[N+1]\to\mathbb{R}^n with values in CC, and a system tt of convex weights of length N+1N+1 be given; adopt the notation of claim 2. If tN+1=1t_{N+1}=1, then by claim 2(a) the combination equals xN+1x_{N+1}, which lies in CC. Otherwise claim 2(b) applies: Ο„\tau is a system of convex weights of length NN and the restriction xβ€²x' takes all of its values in CC, so y∈Cy\in C by the induction hypothesis, and

βˆ‘k=1N+1tkxk=s y+(1βˆ’s) xN+1\sum_{k=1}^{N+1}t_kx_k=s\,y+(1-s)\,x_{N+1}

with 0≀s0\le s and s≀1s\le1. Since CC is convex, this point lies in CC. Hence N+1∈PN+1\in\mathcal{P}, and by induction P\mathcal{P} contains every natural number NN with 1≀N1\le N.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…