TheoremBase

Bounds the Gaussian weight by an exponential tail to get a finite positive normalizing constant, checks continuity of the distribution function, and computes the square of the constant as a plane integral by the layer-cake identity and the scaling of disks, using a self-contained preliminary on affine changes of variable for Lebesgue measure.

Proof

We keep the notation of the statement, use the [0,∞][0,\infty]-valued measurability and integral of Nonnegative Measurable Maps and Their Lebesgue Integral, and use the vocabulary jointly Borel of Joint Distribution, Expectations, and Block Independence for Independent Random Variables for maps on R2\mathbb{R}^2 measurable with respect to B(R)⊗B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}). From Basic Properties of the Exponential Function: exp⁡\exp is positive, strictly increasing, satisfies exp⁡(s+t)=exp⁡(s)exp⁡(t)\exp(s+t)=\exp(s)\exp(t) and exp⁡′=exp⁡\exp'=\exp, and from the defining series exp⁡(t)≥1+t≥t\exp(t)\ge1+t\ge t for t≥0t\ge0; the natural logarithm ln⁡\ln is its inverse, so for s>0s>0 and real ww: exp⁡(w)>s  ⟺  w>ln⁡s\exp(w)>s\iff w>\ln s, and exp⁡(−ln⁡s)=1/s\exp(-\ln s)=1/s by the product property. Note gg is continuous, hence Borel measurable, and 0<g≤10<g\le1.

Preliminary (affine maps). Let T(x)=αx+βT(x)=\alpha x+\beta with real α≠0\alpha\neq0 and β\beta, and write λ∗\lambda^{*} for the Lebesgue outer measure. Images of intervals under TT are intervals with lengths multiplied by ∣α∣|\alpha|, so interval covers of EE map to interval covers of T(E)T(E) and λ∗(T(E))≤∣α∣λ∗(E)\lambda^{*}(T(E))\le|\alpha|\lambda^{*}(E); applying the same to the affine map T−1T^{-1} gives equality, λ∗(T(E))=∣α∣λ∗(E)\lambda^{*}(T(E))=|\alpha|\lambda^{*}(E) for every E⊆RE\subseteq\mathbb{R}. For Borel BB both T−1(B)T^{-1}(B) and T(B)=(T−1)−1(B)T(B)=(T^{-1})^{-1}(B) are Borel, being preimages under continuous maps (preimages of the generating open sets are open), and on Borel sets λ\lambda is the restriction of λ∗\lambda^{*} (claim 3 of Lebesgue Measure on the Real Line: Existence, Lengths of Intervals and Uniqueness); hence

λ(T−1(B))=λ∗(T−1(B))=∣α∣−1λ∗(B)=∣α∣−1λ(B),\lambda(T^{-1}(B))=\lambda^{*}(T^{-1}(B))=|\alpha|^{-1}\lambda^{*}(B)=|\alpha|^{-1}\lambda(B),

and in the same way λ(T(B))=∣α∣λ(B)\lambda(T(B))=|\alpha|\lambda(B). By the standard machine (indicators: ∫1B∘T dλ=λ(T−1(B))=∣α∣−1∫1B dλ\int\mathbf{1}_B\circ T\,d\lambda=\lambda(T^{-1}(B))=|\alpha|^{-1}\int\mathbf{1}_B\,d\lambda; nonnegative simple functions by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion; general hh by Monotone Convergence Theorem along the dyadic staircase approximations φL∘h\varphi_L\circ h, where φL(t)=min⁡{L,2−L⌊2Lt⌋}\varphi_L(t)=\min\{L,2^{-L}\lfloor2^{L}t\rfloor\} for t≥0t\ge0 and L∈NL\in\mathbb{N}, nonnegative simple functions increasing pointwise to hh, whose compositions with TT increase to h∘Th\circ T), for every nonnegative Borel measurable hh,

∫Rh(αx+β) dλ(x)=1∣α∣∫Rh dλ.\int_{\mathbb{R}}h(\alpha x+\beta)\,d\lambda(x)=\frac{1}{|\alpha|}\int_{\mathbb{R}}h\,d\lambda .

Claim 1. ν(∅)=0\nu(\emptyset)=0. For pairwise disjoint Borel BjB_j: 1⋃jBj g=∑j1Bjg\mathbf{1}_{\bigcup_jB_j}\,g=\sum_j\mathbf{1}_{B_j}g pointwise, the partial sums are nondecreasing, finite sums pull out of the integral by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion, and Monotone Convergence Theorem gives ν(⋃jBj)=∑jν(Bj)\nu(\bigcup_jB_j)=\sum_j\nu(B_j). So ν\nu is a measure.

Claim 2. For ∣x∣≥2|x|\ge2 we have x2/2≥∣x∣x^{2}/2\ge|x|, so g(x)≤exp⁡(−∣x∣)g(x)\le\exp(-|x|) by monotonicity of exp⁡\exp. Moreover ∫Rexp⁡(−∣x∣) dλ≤4\int_{\mathbb{R}}\exp(-|x|)\,d\lambda\le4: by monotonicity of the integral on each interval [k,k+1)[k,k+1) (where exp⁡(−x)≤exp⁡(−k)\exp(-x)\le\exp(-k), a constant on an interval of Lebesgue measure one), the simple-function bounds and Monotone Convergence Theorem along 1[0,L)exp⁡(−x)↑1[0,∞)exp⁡(−x)\mathbf{1}_{[0,L)}\exp(-x)\uparrow\mathbf{1}_{[0,\infty)}\exp(-x) give ∫[0,∞)exp⁡(−x) dλ≤∑k≥0exp⁡(−1)k≤2\int_{[0,\infty)}\exp(-x)\,d\lambda\le\sum_{k\ge0}\exp(-1)^{k}\le2 (geometric series; exp⁡(1)≥2\exp(1)\ge2 from the series, so exp⁡(−1)≤1/2\exp(-1)\le1/2). The negative half-line contributes the same: the Preliminary with α=−1\alpha=-1, β=0\beta=0, applied to h(x)=1[0,∞)(x)exp⁡(−x)h(x)=\mathbf{1}_{[0,\infty)}(x)\exp(-x), for which h(−x)=1(−∞,0](x)exp⁡(−∣x∣)h(-x)=\mathbf{1}_{(-\infty,0]}(x)\exp(-|x|), gives ∫(−∞,0]exp⁡(−∣x∣) dλ=∫[0,∞)exp⁡(−x) dλ≤2\int_{(-\infty,0]}\exp(-|x|)\,d\lambda=\int_{[0,\infty)}\exp(-x)\,d\lambda\le2. Since exp⁡(−∣x∣)≤1(−∞,0](x)exp⁡(−∣x∣)+1[0,∞)(x)exp⁡(−x)\exp(-|x|)\le\mathbf{1}_{(-\infty,0]}(x)\exp(-|x|)+\mathbf{1}_{[0,\infty)}(x)\exp(-x) pointwise (the point 00 is counted in both halves, which only enlarges the bound), the two halves give ∫exp⁡(−∣x∣) dλ≤4\int\exp(-|x|)\,d\lambda\le4. Hence, splitting R\mathbb{R} into [−2,2][-2,2] and its complement and using g≤1g\le1,

c=∫g dλ ≤ λ([−2,2])+∫exp⁡(−∣x∣) dλ ≤ 4+4 < ∞.c=\int g\,d\lambda\ \le\ \lambda([-2,2])+\int\exp(-|x|)\,d\lambda\ \le\ 4+4\ <\ \infty .

Also c>0c>0: gg is nonincreasing in ∣x∣|x|, so g≥g(1)=exp⁡(−1/2)>0g\ge g(1)=\exp(-1/2)>0 on [−1,1][-1,1], whence c≥exp⁡(−1/2) λ([−1,1])=2exp⁡(−1/2)>0c\ge\exp(-1/2)\,\lambda([-1,1])=2\exp(-1/2)>0 by monotonicity. Finally N=ν/cN=\nu/c is a measure (additivity is preserved under multiplication by the constant 1/c1/c) with N(R)=c/c=1N(\mathbb{R})=c/c=1, a probability measure.

Claim 3. For s<ts<t, additivity gives ν((−∞,t])−ν((−∞,s])=ν((s,t])=∫1(s,t] g dλ≤∫1(s,t] dλ=t−s\nu((-\infty,t])-\nu((-\infty,s])=\nu((s,t])=\int\mathbf{1}_{(s,t]}\,g\,d\lambda\le\int\mathbf{1}_{(s,t]}\,d\lambda=t-s, using g≤1g\le1, monotonicity, and interval lengths. So t↦ν((−∞,t])t\mapsto\nu((-\infty,t]) satisfies ∣ν((−∞,t])−ν((−∞,s])∣≤∣t−s∣|\nu((-\infty,t])-\nu((-\infty,s])|\le|t-s| and is continuous at every point (take δ=ε\delta=\varepsilon); dividing by cc, Φ\Phi is continuous on R\mathbb{R}.

Claim 4. Write g2(x,y)=g(x)g(y)g_2(x,y)=g(x)g(y), jointly Borel: coordinate projections are jointly Borel and compositions with Borel maps remain jointly Borel (claim 4 of Joint Distribution, Expectations, and Block Independence for Independent Random Variables), and products of jointly Borel functions are jointly Borel since uv=((u+v)2−u2−v2)/2uv=((u+v)^{2}-u^{2}-v^{2})/2.

(i) c2c^{2} as a plane integral. λ\lambda is σ\sigma-finite (R=⋃L[−L,L]\mathbb{R}=\bigcup_L[-L,L]), so Tonelli's and Fubini's Theorems applies to g2≥0g_2\ge0: for fixed yy, ∫g(x)g(y) dλ(x)=g(y) c\int g(x)g(y)\,d\lambda(x)=g(y)\,c (nonnegative scalars pull out, claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion), hence

∫R2g2 d(λ⊗λ)=∫Rc g(y) dλ(y)=c2.\int_{\mathbb{R}^2}g_2\,d(\lambda\otimes\lambda)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}c\,g(y)\,d\lambda(y)=c^{2}.

(ii) Layer-cake identity. Let (W,A,m)(W,\mathcal{A},m) be a σ\sigma-finite measure space and h:W→[0,∞]h:W\to[0,\infty] an A\mathcal{A}-measurable function. Then

∫Wh dm=∫(0,∞)m({h>s}) dλ(s).\int_Wh\,dm=\int_{(0,\infty)}m(\{h>s\})\,d\lambda(s).

Indeed, by density of the rationals the set Eh={(w,s):0<s<h(w)}E_h=\{(w,s):0<s<h(w)\} satisfies Eh=⋃q∈Q,q>0({h>q}×(0,q))E_h=\bigcup_{q\in\mathbb{Q},q>0}\bigl(\{h>q\}\times(0,q)\bigr), a countable union of measurable rectangles, so Eh∈A⊗B(R)E_h\in\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) (Measurable Rectangles and the Product σ-Algebra). Applying Tonelli's and Fubini's Theorems to 1Eh\mathbf{1}_{E_h} over m⊗λm\otimes\lambda: the ww-indexed sections are (Eh)w=(0,h(w))(E_h)_w=(0,h(w)) with λ((0,h(w)))=h(w)\lambda((0,h(w)))=h(w) (interval lengths, including the value ∞\infty for h(w)=∞h(w)=\infty, since λ((0,∞))=∞\lambda((0,\infty))=\infty by continuity from below), while the ss-indexed sections are {h>s}\{h>s\} for s>0s>0 and ∅\emptyset otherwise; the two iterated integrals give the two sides.

(iii) Dilations of the plane. For r>0r>0 and E∈B(R)⊗B(R)E\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}), write rE={(rx,ry):(x,y)∈E}rE=\{(rx,ry):(x,y)\in E\}. The map Sr(x,y)=(x/r,y/r)S_r(x,y)=(x/r,y/r) satisfies Sr−1(A×B)=(rA)×(rB)S_r^{-1}(A\times B)=(rA)\times(rB), with rArA Borel (it is the preimage of AA under the continuous map x↦x/rx\mapsto x/r), so SrS_r is measurable and rE=Sr−1(E)rE=S_r^{-1}(E) is again in the product σ\sigma-algebra. The set function E↦(λ⊗λ)(rE)E\mapsto(\lambda\otimes\lambda)(rE) is a measure (preimages preserve disjoint unions) assigning to a rectangle the value λ(rA)λ(rB)=r2λ(A)λ(B)\lambda(rA)\lambda(rB)=r^{2}\lambda(A)\lambda(B), by the Preliminary with α=r\alpha=r, β=0\beta=0. The set function E↦r2(λ⊗λ)(E)E\mapsto r^{2}(\lambda\otimes\lambda)(E) is a measure with the same rectangle values, namely those of the product of the σ\sigma-finite measure rλr\lambda with itself; by the uniqueness clause of Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure both equal (rλ)⊗(rλ)(r\lambda)\otimes(r\lambda), so

(λ⊗λ)(rE)=r2 (λ⊗λ)(E).(\lambda\otimes\lambda)(rE)=r^{2}\,(\lambda\otimes\lambda)(E).

(iv) Disks. Let D∘={(x,y):x2+y2<1}D^{\circ}=\{(x,y):x^{2}+y^{2}<1\}, which is in the product σ\sigma-algebra since (x,y)↦x2+y2(x,y)\mapsto x^{2}+y^{2} is jointly Borel; similarly DD (use ≤\le). For 0<s<10<s<1, sD⊆D∘⊆DsD\subseteq D^{\circ}\subseteq D, so by monotonicity and (iii), s2π≤(λ⊗λ)(D∘)≤πs^{2}\pi\le(\lambda\otimes\lambda)(D^{\circ})\le\pi; letting s→1s\to1 gives (λ⊗λ)(D∘)=π(\lambda\otimes\lambda)(D^{\circ})=\pi. Hence for R>0R>0, (λ⊗λ)(R D∘)=πR2(\lambda\otimes\lambda)(R\,D^{\circ})=\pi R^{2}.

(v) Conclusion. For 0<s<10<s<1: g2(x,y)>s  ⟺  exp⁡(−(x2+y2)/2)>s  ⟺  −(x2+y2)/2>ln⁡s  ⟺  x2+y2<2ln⁡(1/s)g_2(x,y)>s\iff\exp(-(x^{2}+y^{2})/2)>s\iff-(x^{2}+y^{2})/2>\ln s\iff x^{2}+y^{2}<2\ln(1/s), using the inverse relation between exp⁡\exp and ln⁡\ln and −ln⁡s=ln⁡(1/s)-\ln s=\ln(1/s); thus {g2>s}=Rs D∘\{g_2>s\}=R_s\,D^{\circ} with Rs=2ln⁡(1/s)R_s=\sqrt{2\ln(1/s)} (positive square root), of measure πRs2=2πln⁡(1/s)\pi R_s^{2}=2\pi\ln(1/s) by (iv). For s≥1s\ge1, {g2>s}=∅\{g_2>s\}=\emptyset since g2≤1g_2\le1. By (i) and (ii) applied on (R2,λ⊗λ)(\mathbb{R}^2,\lambda\otimes\lambda) (σ\sigma-finite by Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure),

c2=∫(0,∞)(λ⊗λ)({g2>s}) dλ(s)=2π∫(0,1)ln⁡(1/s) dλ(s).c^{2}=\int_{(0,\infty)}(\lambda\otimes\lambda)(\{g_2>s\})\,d\lambda(s)=2\pi\int_{(0,1)}\ln(1/s)\,d\lambda(s).

Finally ∫(0,1)ln⁡(1/s) dλ(s)=1\int_{(0,1)}\ln(1/s)\,d\lambda(s)=1: by (ii) applied on (R,λ)(\mathbb{R},\lambda) to h(s)=ln⁡(1/s)1(0,1)(s)h(s)=\ln(1/s)\mathbf{1}_{(0,1)}(s) (measurable: for u>0u>0, {h>u}={s∈(0,1):1/s>exp⁡(u)}=(0,exp⁡(−u))\{h>u\}=\{s\in(0,1):1/s>\exp(u)\}=(0,\exp(-u)), an interval; for u≤0u\le 0, {h>u}∈B(R)\{h>u\}\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) similarly),

∫(0,1)ln⁡(1/s) dλ(s)=∫(0,∞)λ((0,exp⁡(−u))) dλ(u)=∫(0,∞)exp⁡(−u) dλ(u),\int_{(0,1)}\ln(1/s)\,d\lambda(s)=\int_{(0,\infty)}\lambda\bigl((0,\exp(-u))\bigr)\,d\lambda(u)=\int_{(0,\infty)}\exp(-u)\,d\lambda(u),

and the map u↦−exp⁡(−u)u\mapsto-\exp(-u) is an antiderivative of u↦exp⁡(−u)u\mapsto\exp(-u) on every [0,L][0,L] (one-dimensional chain rule with exp⁡′=exp⁡\exp'=\exp), so by Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part II in One Dimension and Agreement of the Riemann and Lebesgue Integrals for Continuous Functions on a Closed Interval, ∫1[0,L]exp⁡(−u) dλ=1−exp⁡(−L)\int\mathbf{1}_{[0,L]}\exp(-u)\,d\lambda=1-\exp(-L); by Monotone Convergence Theorem and exp⁡(−L)≤1/L→0\exp(-L)\le1/L\to0 (from exp⁡(L)≥L\exp(L)\ge L), the integral equals 11. Hence c2=2πc^{2}=2\pi. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…