TheoremBase

Proof

Write A=φ(U∩V)A=\varphi(U\cap V), a set open in the closed upper half-space HnH^n.

Claim 1. The value det⁡JF(a)\det J_F(a) does not depend on the chosen local smooth extension FF, since first-order partial derivatives at points of a set open in HnH^n are determined by the values of the map on that set (as observed in Smooth Diffeomorphism of Euclidean or Half-Space Domains, Jacobian, and Pullback), and x↦det⁡JF(x)x\mapsto\det J_F(x) is continuous near aa, being obtained from the continuous partial derivatives of FF by finitely many sums and products (Determinant of a Real Square Matrix, Sums and Products of Continuous Real-Valued Functions).

If a∈A∩int⁡(Hn)a\in A\cap\operatorname{int}(H^n), then a∈φ(U∩V∩int⁡(M))a\in\varphi(U\cap V\cap\operatorname{int}(M)) by claim 3 of Boundary of a Smooth Manifold with Boundary as a Smooth Manifold of Dimension n-1 (interior points are exactly those mapping into the interior of the half-space), and det⁡JF(a)>0\det J_F(a)>0 is precisely the positive compatibility required of the oriented smooth atlas.

If a∈A∩∂Hna\in A\cap\partial H^n: since AA is open in HnH^n, the points a+tena+te_n (with ene_n the last standard basis vector) lie in A∩int⁡(Hn)A\cap\operatorname{int}(H^n) for all sufficiently small t>0t>0, so det⁡JF(a+ten)>0\det J_F(a+te_n)>0 there; letting t→0+t\to 0^{+} and using continuity, det⁡JF(a)≥0\det J_F(a)\ge 0. Moreover det⁡JF(a)≠0\det J_F(a)\ne 0: exactly as in Step A of the proof of Boundary of a Smooth Manifold with Boundary as a Smooth Manifold of Dimension n-1, a local smooth extension GG of the inverse transition satisfies JG(F(a)) JF(a)=J_G(F(a))\,J_F(a)= identity matrix by the chain rule (the composition equals the identity on a set open in HnH^n around aa, which determines the first-order partials at aa), so JF(a)J_F(a) is invertible and its determinant is nonzero. Hence det⁡JF(a)>0\det J_F(a)>0.

Claim 2. By claim 3 of Boundary of a Smooth Manifold with Boundary as a Smooth Manifold of Dimension n-1, the transition maps A∩∂HnA\cap\partial H^n into ∂Hn\partial H^n; since FF agrees with the transition on W∩AW\cap A for its domain WW, we have Fn=0F_n=0 on W∩A∩∂HnW\cap A\cap\partial H^n, which is open in ∂Hn\partial H^n and contains aa. For j∈{1,…,n−1}j\in\{1,\dots,n-1\}: the points a+heja+he_j lie in A∩∂HnA\cap\partial H^n for small ∣h∣|h|, where FnF_n vanishes; since the partial derivative of the extension at aa is determined by these values (the difference quotients along the boundary directions), ∂Fn∂xj(a)=0\frac{\partial F_n}{\partial x_j}(a)=0. For j=nj=n: FF maps W∩AW\cap A into HnH^n, so Fn(a+ten)≥0F_n(a+te_n)\ge 0 for small t>0t>0 while Fn(a)=0F_n(a)=0; the one-sided difference quotients are ≥0\ge 0, and since ∂Fn∂xn\frac{\partial F_n}{\partial x_n} is continuous, the partial derivative at aa equals the limit of these one-sided quotients, so ∂Fn∂xn(a)≥0\frac{\partial F_n}{\partial x_n}(a)\ge 0. Expanding det⁡JF(a)\det J_F(a) along its nnth row — whose only possibly nonzero entry is ∂Fn∂xn(a)\frac{\partial F_n}{\partial x_n}(a) — using Minor, Cofactor, and Adjugate of a Real Square Matrix gives

det⁡JF(a)=∂Fn∂xn(a)⋅det⁡J′(a),\det J_F(a)=\frac{\partial F_n}{\partial x_n}(a)\cdot\det J'(a),

where J′(a)J'(a) is the (n−1)×(n−1)(n-1)\times(n-1) matrix with entries ∂Fi∂xj(a)\frac{\partial F_i}{\partial x_j}(a) for i,j≤n−1i,j\le n-1. Since det⁡JF(a)>0\det J_F(a)>0 by claim 1 and ∂Fn∂xn(a)≥0\frac{\partial F_n}{\partial x_n}(a)\ge 0, we conclude ∂Fn∂xn(a)>0\frac{\partial F_n}{\partial x_n}(a)>0 (and also det⁡J′(a)>0\det J'(a)>0).

Claim 3. By claim 4 of Boundary of a Smooth Manifold with Boundary as a Smooth Manifold of Dimension n-1 (and its proof), the boundary transition ψ2∘ψ1−1\psi_2\circ\psi_1^{-1} is a bijection between its images admitting, at every point and in both directions, local smooth extensions of the form

G(z)=Tc2(π(F(Tc1−1(z),0))),G(z)=T_{c_2}\bigl(\pi\bigl(F(T_{c_1}^{-1}(z),0)\bigr)\bigr),

with FF a local smooth extension of the ambient transition, π\pi the projection dropping the last coordinate, and Tc1,Tc2T_{c_1},T_{c_2} the translations of the charts. Both images are open subsets of Rn−1\mathbb{R}^{n-1}, hence admissible domains in the sense of Continuous n-Form, Support, and Zero Extension on a Euclidean or Half-Space Domain; so the boundary transition is a smooth diffeomorphism of admissible domains. Its Jacobian matrix at zz is computed from GG: translations have identity Jacobian, so by the chain rule the (i,j)(i,j) entry of JG(z)J_G(z), for i,j≤n−1i,j\le n-1, is ∂Fi∂xj(a)\frac{\partial F_i}{\partial x_j}(a) with a=(Tc1−1(z),0)a=(T_{c_1}^{-1}(z),0) — that is, JG(z)=J′(a)J_G(z)=J'(a) in the notation of claim 2. By claim 2, det⁡J′(a)>0\det J'(a)>0. Hence the boundary transition is orientation-preserving. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…