TheoremBase

Proof

Every step below in which the same quantity is added to both sides of an inequality, or an inequality is negated, is justified by the elementary order arithmetic in an ordered field; the same lemma, with the totality of the order of an ordered field, is what converts a failure of x<yx<y into y≤xy\le x.

Uniqueness. Suppose m,n∈Zm,n\in\mathbb{Z} both satisfy the displayed condition and m≠nm\ne n; without loss of generality m<nm<n. By claim 3 of the arithmetic and discreteness lemma for the integers, m+1≤nm+1\le n. Combining x<m+1x<m+1 with m+1≤nm+1\le n and n≤xn\le x gives x<xx<x, which is false. Hence m=nm=n.

Existence. Fix x∈Rx\in\mathbb{R}. By claim 1 of the Archimedean property applied to −x-x, there is N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with −x<ι(N)-x<\iota(N), that is −ι(N)<x-\iota(N)<x. Put

S={k∈N  :  x<−ι(N)+ι(k)}.S=\bigl\{k\in\mathbb{N}\;:\;x<-\iota(N)+\iota(k)\bigr\}.

The set SS is nonempty: by claim 1 of the Archimedean property applied to x+ι(N)x+\iota(N) there is M∈NM\in\mathbb{N} with x+ι(N)<ι(M)x+\iota(N)<\iota(M), hence x<−ι(N)+ι(M)x<-\iota(N)+\iota(M) and M∈SM\in S.

By the well-ordering of the natural numbers, SS has a least element k0k_{0}. Set

n=−ι(N)+ι(k0)−1.n=-\iota(N)+\iota(k_{0})-1 .

Since ι(N)\iota(N) and ι(k0)\iota(k_{0}) lie in Z\mathbb{Z} by the definition of Z\mathbb{Z}, and 1∈Z1\in\mathbb{Z}, claim 2 of the arithmetic lemma gives n∈Zn\in\mathbb{Z}.

The upper inequality. Because k0∈Sk_{0}\in S we have x<−ι(N)+ι(k0)=n+1x<-\iota(N)+\iota(k_{0})=n+1.

The lower inequality. Every natural number is either 11 or the successor of a natural number: the set {1}∪{j+1:j∈N}\{1\}\cup\{j+1:j\in\mathbb{N}\} contains 11 and contains k+1k+1 whenever it contains kk, hence equals N\mathbb{N} by the principle of induction.

If k0=1k_{0}=1 then ι(k0)=ι(1)=1\iota(k_{0})=\iota(1)=1 by claim 1 of the properties of the canonical map, so n=−ι(N)n=-\iota(N), and n<xn<x was established above; in particular n≤xn\le x.

Otherwise k0=j+1k_{0}=j+1 for some j∈Nj\in\mathbb{N}. Then j<k0j<k_{0} by the definition of the order on N\mathbb{N}, so j∉Sj\notin S by minimality of k0k_{0}; that is, −ι(N)+ι(j)≤x-\iota(N)+\iota(j)\le x. By claim 1 of the properties of the canonical map, ι(k0)=ι(j+1)=ι(j)+1\iota(k_{0})=\iota(j+1)=\iota(j)+1, whence

n=−ι(N)+ι(j)+1−1=−ι(N)+ι(j)≤x.n=-\iota(N)+\iota(j)+1-1=-\iota(N)+\iota(j)\le x .

So n≤x<n+1n\le x<n+1, which proves existence. Writing ⌊x⌋\lfloor x\rfloor for this unique integer, the inequality ⌊x⌋≤x\lfloor x\rfloor\le x is immediate, and x<⌊x⌋+1x<\lfloor x\rfloor+1 gives x−1<⌊x⌋x-1<\lfloor x\rfloor on adding −1-1 to both sides.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…