TheoremBase

Proof of Uniqueness and Continuity on Energy Sublevel Sets of Bounded Viscosity Solutions on the Wasserstein Space

corollarycor:comparison-uniqueness-continuity-wasserstein-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 4,530 chars · 16 deps · depth 42 Reason: Proof of uniqueness and uniform continuity on sublevel sets from the comparison principle.

Uniqueness is the comparison principle applied in both directions. For continuity, the comparison of the envelopes applied with v = u makes the upper and lower delta-envelopes of u uniformly close for small delta; semicontinuity of the envelopes and the bound on the penalty on the sublevel set then give continuity there, and the Heine-Cantor theorem on the compact sublevel set gives uniform continuity.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named here. s|s| is the absolute value of sRs\in\mathbb{R} and W=W2W=W_{2}.

Claim 1. Let bb and bb'' be bounds for uu and vv; by claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, bu(μ)b-b\le u(\mu)\le b and bv(μ)b-b''\le v(\mu)\le b'' for every μD\mu\in\mathcal{D}. By Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on the Wasserstein Space §solution, uu and vv are each a viscosity subsolution and a viscosity supersolution of FF relative to the penalty pair. A Comparison Principle for Viscosity Solutions on the Wasserstein Space §comparison, applied to the subsolution uu, bounded above by bb, and the supersolution vv, bounded below by b-b'', gives u(μ)v(μ)u(\mu)\le v(\mu) for every μD\mu\in\mathcal{D}; applied to the subsolution vv, bounded above by bb'', and the supersolution uu, bounded below by b-b, it gives v(μ)u(μ)v(\mu)\le u(\mu). By antisymmetry of the order of R\mathbb{R} (Total Order on a Set), u(μ)=v(μ)u(\mu)=v(\mu).

Claim 2. Let bb be a bound for uu, so that bu(μ)b-b\le u(\mu)\le b for every μD\mu\in\mathcal{D} (claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field), and let cRc\in\mathbb{R}. As in Claim 1, uu is a viscosity subsolution bounded above by bb and a viscosity supersolution bounded below by b-b. For positive δ\delta, Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Wasserstein Space §semicontinuity gives that uδu^{-}_{\delta} is upper and uδ+u^{+}_{\delta} lower semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D} relative to D\mathcal{D} in (P2(Rd),W)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),W), with

u(ν)uδ(ν)+δE(ν),uδ+(ν)δE(ν)u(ν)(νD).(2a)u(\nu)\le u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu),\qquad u^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le u(\nu)\qquad(\nu\in\mathcal{D}).\qquad(2\mathrm{a})

For νKc\nu\in K_{c} one has E(ν)cc\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le c\le|c| (claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field).

Continuity on KcK_{c}. Let μKc\mu\in K_{c} and let ε\varepsilon be positive; put θ=ε/3\theta=\varepsilon/3. By A Comparison Principle for Viscosity Solutions on the Wasserstein Space §envelopes, applied with v=uv=u (and the bounds bb and b-b), there is a positive δ0\delta_{0} with uδ(ρ)uδ+(ρ)θu^{-}_{\delta}(\rho)-u^{+}_{\delta}(\rho)\le\theta for every ρD\rho\in\mathcal{D} and every δ\delta with 0<δ<δ00<\delta<\delta_{0}. Let δ\delta be half the least of δ0\delta_{0} and θ(2c+1)1\theta\bigl(2|c|+1\bigr)^{-1}; then 0<δ<δ00<\delta<\delta_{0} and 2δcθ2\delta|c|\le\theta. By the upper semicontinuity of uδu^{-}_{\delta} at μ\mu (Upper Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space) and the lower semicontinuity of uδ+u^{+}_{\delta} at μ\mu (Lower Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space), there is a positive rr such that every νD\nu\in\mathcal{D} with W(ν,μ)<rW(\nu,\mu)<r satisfies uδ(ν)<uδ(μ)+θu^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)<u^{-}_{\delta}(\mu)+\theta and uδ+(μ)θ<uδ+(ν)u^{+}_{\delta}(\mu)-\theta<u^{+}_{\delta}(\nu) (take the least of the two radii, claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). Let νKc\nu\in K_{c} with W(ν,μ)<rW(\nu,\mu)<r. Using (2a), these two bounds, uδ(μ)uδ+(μ)+θu^{-}_{\delta}(\mu)\le u^{+}_{\delta}(\mu)+\theta, and δE(ν)δc\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le\delta|c|, δE(μ)δc\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu)\le\delta|c| (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field),

u(ν)uδ(ν)+δE(ν)<uδ+(μ)+2θ+δE(ν)u(μ)+δE(μ)+δE(ν)+2θu(μ)+2δc+2θu(μ)+ε,u(\nu)\le u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)<u^{+}_{\delta}(\mu)+2\theta+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le u(\mu)+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu)+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)+2\theta\le u(\mu)+2\delta|c|+2\theta\le u(\mu)+\varepsilon, u(ν)uδ+(ν)δE(ν)>uδ(μ)2θδE(ν)u(μ)δE(μ)δE(ν)2θu(μ)ε.u(\nu)\ge u^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)>u^{-}_{\delta}(\mu)-2\theta-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)\ge u(\mu)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)-2\theta\ge u(\mu)-\varepsilon .

So u(ν)u(μ)<ε|u(\nu)-u(\mu)|<\varepsilon by claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field (the first chain is strict at its second step, the second at its second step). Hence the restriction of uu to KcK_{c} is continuous on KcK_{c}.

Uniform continuity. The set KcK_{c} is sequentially compact in (P2(Rd),W)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),W) by Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pairs §coercive, hence compact in the topology of that metric space by A Sequentially Compact Subset of a Metric Space is Compact. By Heine-Cantor Theorem: Continuity on a Compact Subset Implies Uniform Continuity, with X=P2(Rd)X=\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), K=KcK=K_{c}, Y=RY=\mathbb{R} and ff the restriction of uu to KcK_{c}, that restriction is uniformly continuous on KcK_{c}.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…