TheoremBase

Tonelli is proved for indicators from the section formula for the product measure, extended to nonnegative simple functions by additivity and to all nonnegative measurable functions by dyadic approximation and monotone convergence; Fubini follows by applying Tonelli to |f|, f⁺ and f⁻ and discarding the null set where the sections fail to be integrable.

Proof

Throughout, the section at x∈Xx\in X of a function on XΓ—YX\times Y is its composite with the insertion y↦(x,y)y\mapsto(x,y) (Precomposition Commutes with Pointwise Operations, and Sections of Functions Are Precompositions (iv)), and composites commute with the pointwise operations and send indicators to indicators of preimages, here of sections (Precomposition Commutes with Pointwise Operations, and Sections of Functions Are Precompositions (ii), Precomposition Commutes with Pointwise Operations, and Sections of Functions Are Precompositions (i), Rectangles, Sections and the Swap: Set Identities (iii)). So for functions f,gf,g on XΓ—YX\times Y, c∈[0,∞]c\in[0,\infty], EβŠ†XΓ—YE\subseteq X\times Y and x∈Xx\in X,

(f+g)x=fx+gx,(cf)x=cfx,(1E)x=1Ex,∣f∣x=∣fx∣,(f±)x=(fx)±,(f+g)_{x}=f_{x}+g_{x},\qquad(cf)_{x}=cf_{x},\qquad(\mathbf{1}_{E})_{x}=\mathbf{1}_{E_{x}},\qquad|f|_{x}=|f_{x}|,\qquad(f^{\pm})_{x}=(f_{x})^{\pm},

and if (fm)(f_{m}) is a sequence of functions XΓ—Yβ†’[0,∞]X\times Y\to[0,\infty] and h(p)=sup⁑mfm(p)h(p)=\sup_{m}f_{m}(p) for every p∈XΓ—Yp\in X\times Y, then hx(y)=sup⁑m(fm)x(y)h_{x}(y)=\sup_{m}(f_{m})_{x}(y) for every y∈Yy\in Y; likewise at y∈Yy\in Y. Sections of measurable functions are measurable (The Product Οƒ-Algebra: Rectangles, Generators, Sections, Projections, Pairings and the Swap (v)): for f∈M+(XΓ—Y,FβŠ—G)f\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X\times Y,\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{G}), fx∈M+(Y,G)f_{x}\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(Y,\mathcal{G}) and fy∈M+(X,F)f^{y}\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}), and for a measurable f:XΓ—Yβ†’Rf:X\times Y\to\mathbb{R}, fx:Yβ†’Rf_{x}:Y\to\mathbb{R} and fy:Xβ†’Rf^{y}:X\to\mathbb{R} are measurable.

Proof of (i). We prove that xβ†¦βˆ«Yfx dΞ½x\mapsto\int_{Y}f_{x}\,d\nu lies in M+(X,F)\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}) and that the first two integrals in the display agree. The statements about yβ†¦βˆ«Xfy dΞΌy\mapsto\int_{X}f^{y}\,d\mu follow by the same argument with sections at yy in place of sections at xx, using the second formula of Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure (iii) in Step 1.

For f∈M+(XΓ—Y,FβŠ—G)f\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X\times Y,\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{G}) write Ξ¦f(x)=∫Yfx dΞ½\Phi_{f}(x)=\int_{Y}f_{x}\,d\nu for x∈Xx\in X, and let H\mathcal{H} be the set of those f∈M+(XΓ—Y,FβŠ—G)f\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X\times Y,\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{G}) for which

Ξ¦f∈M+(X,F)and∫XΞ¦f dΞΌ=∫XΓ—Yf d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½).\Phi_{f}\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F})\qquad\text{and}\qquad\int_{X}\Phi_{f}\,d\mu=\int_{X\times Y}f\,d(\mu\otimes\nu).

We show H=M+(XΓ—Y,FβŠ—G)\mathcal{H}=\mathcal{M}^{+}(X\times Y,\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{G}).

Step 1: indicators. Let E∈FβŠ—GE\in\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{G}. Then 1E∈M+(XΓ—Y,FβŠ—G)\mathbf{1}_{E}\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X\times Y,\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{G}) and, as Ex∈GE_{x}\in\mathcal{G} (The Product Οƒ-Algebra: Rectangles, Generators, Sections, Projections, Pairings and the Swap (iv)), Ξ¦1E(x)=∫Y1Ex dΞ½=Ξ½(Ex)\Phi_{\mathbf{1}_{E}}(x)=\int_{Y}\mathbf{1}_{E_{x}}\,d\nu=\nu(E_{x}) (Basic Properties of the Integral of Nonnegative Measurable Maps (ii), on both spaces). By Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure (iii), Ξ¦1E∈M+(X,F)\Phi_{\mathbf{1}_{E}}\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}) and

∫XΞ¦1E dΞΌ=∫XΞ½(Ex) dΞΌ(x)=(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½)(E)=∫XΓ—Y1E d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½).\int_{X}\Phi_{\mathbf{1}_{E}}\,d\mu=\int_{X}\nu(E_{x})\,d\mu(x)=(\mu\otimes\nu)(E)=\int_{X\times Y}\mathbf{1}_{E}\,d(\mu\otimes\nu).

So 1E∈H\mathbf{1}_{E}\in\mathcal{H}.

Step 2: multiples. Let f∈Hf\in\mathcal{H} and let cβ‰₯0c\ge0 be real. Then (cf)x=cfx(cf)_{x}=cf_{x}, and Basic Properties of the Integral of Nonnegative Measurable Maps (iv) on YY, on XX and on XΓ—YX\times Y gives Ξ¦cf=c Φf∈M+(X,F)\Phi_{cf}=c\,\Phi_{f}\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}) and

∫XΞ¦cf dΞΌ=c∫XΞ¦f dΞΌ=c∫XΓ—Yf d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½)=∫XΓ—Ycf d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½).\int_{X}\Phi_{cf}\,d\mu=c\int_{X}\Phi_{f}\,d\mu=c\int_{X\times Y}f\,d(\mu\otimes\nu)=\int_{X\times Y}cf\,d(\mu\otimes\nu).

So cf∈Hcf\in\mathcal{H}.

Step 3: nonnegative simple functions. Let s∈S+(XΓ—Y,FβŠ—G)s\in\mathcal{S}^{+}(X\times Y,\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{G}), let C=s[XΓ—Y]C=s[X\times Y], a finite set of nonnegative reals, and let Ec=sβˆ’1({c})∈FβŠ—GE_{c}=s^{-1}(\{c\})\in\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{G} for c∈Cc\in C (Simple Functions, Nonnegative Simple Functions, and the Simple Integral (iv)). Then

s=βˆ‘c∈Cc 1Ec,sx=βˆ‘c∈Cc 1(Ec)x(x∈X)s=\sum_{c\in C}c\,\mathbf{1}_{E_{c}},\qquad s_{x}=\sum_{c\in C}c\,\mathbf{1}_{(E_{c})_{x}}\quad(x\in X)

pointwise (at p∈XΓ—Yp\in X\times Y the only term that can be nonzero is the one with c=s(p)c=s(p), Finite Sums: Vanishing Terms, Finite Additivity of Measures, and Finite Sums of Series in [0,∞] (iii)), and each c 1Ecc\,\mathbf{1}_{E_{c}} lies in H\mathcal{H} by Steps 1 and 2. The integral of a finite sum in M+\mathcal{M}^{+} is the sum of the integrals (Integrals of Finite Sums of Nonnegative Functions, and Constant Multiples of a Measure (i)). Applied on YY, this gives Ξ¦s=βˆ‘c∈CΞ¦c1Ec\Phi_{s}=\sum_{c\in C}\Phi_{c\mathbf{1}_{E_{c}}}; applied on XX, Ξ¦s∈M+(X,F)\Phi_{s}\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}); and applied on XX and on XΓ—YX\times Y,

∫XΞ¦s dΞΌ=βˆ‘c∈C∫XΞ¦c1Ec dΞΌ=βˆ‘c∈C∫XΓ—Yc 1Ec d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½)=∫XΓ—Ys d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½).\int_{X}\Phi_{s}\,d\mu=\sum_{c\in C}\int_{X}\Phi_{c\mathbf{1}_{E_{c}}}\,d\mu=\sum_{c\in C}\int_{X\times Y}c\,\mathbf{1}_{E_{c}}\,d(\mu\otimes\nu)=\int_{X\times Y}s\,d(\mu\otimes\nu).

So s∈Hs\in\mathcal{H}.

Step 4: all of M+\mathcal{M}^{+}. Let f∈M+(XΓ—Y,FβŠ—G)f\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X\times Y,\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{G}), and let sm=sm(f)s_{m}=s_{m}(f) be its dyadic approximations: sm∈S+(XΓ—Y,FβŠ—G)s_{m}\in\mathcal{S}^{+}(X\times Y,\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{G}), sm≀sm+1s_{m}\le s_{m+1} and f=sup⁑msmf=\sup_{m}s_{m} pointwise (Approximation of Measurable Functions by Dyadic Simple Functions (i)). By Step 3, sm∈Hs_{m}\in\mathcal{H} for every mm. For x∈Xx\in X the sections (sm)x(s_{m})_{x} increase to fxf_{x}, so the monotone convergence theorem on (Y,G,Ξ½)(Y,\mathcal{G},\nu) (Monotone Convergence Theorem (ii)) gives

Φf(x)=sup⁑mΦsm(x).\Phi_{f}(x)=\sup_{m}\Phi_{s_{m}}(x).

The functions Ξ¦sm∈M+(X,F)\Phi_{s_{m}}\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}) increase with mm (Basic Properties of the Integral of Nonnegative Measurable Maps (iii)), so Ξ¦f∈M+(X,F)\Phi_{f}\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}) (Monotone Convergence Theorem (i)), and monotone convergence on (X,F,ΞΌ)(X,\mathcal{F},\mu) and on (XΓ—Y,FβŠ—G,ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½)(X\times Y,\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{G},\mu\otimes\nu) (Monotone Convergence Theorem (ii)) gives

∫XΞ¦f dΞΌ=sup⁑m∫XΞ¦sm dΞΌ=sup⁑m∫XΓ—Ysm d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½)=∫XΓ—Yf d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½).\int_{X}\Phi_{f}\,d\mu=\sup_{m}\int_{X}\Phi_{s_{m}}\,d\mu=\sup_{m}\int_{X\times Y}s_{m}\,d(\mu\otimes\nu)=\int_{X\times Y}f\,d(\mu\otimes\nu).

So f∈Hf\in\mathcal{H}, which proves (i).

Proof of (ii). Let f∈L1(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½)f\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mu\otimes\nu). Then ∣f∣,f+,fβˆ’βˆˆM+(XΓ—Y,FβŠ—G)|f|,f^{+},f^{-}\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X\times Y,\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{G}) and

∫XΓ—Y∣fβˆ£β€‰d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½)=∫XΓ—Yf+ d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½)+∫XΓ—Yfβˆ’β€‰d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½)<∞\int_{X\times Y}|f|\,d(\mu\otimes\nu)=\int_{X\times Y}f^{+}\,d(\mu\otimes\nu)+\int_{X\times Y}f^{-}\,d(\mu\otimes\nu)<\infty

(Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (iv)).

The exceptional set. Let G(x)=∫Y∣fxβˆ£β€‰dΞ½G(x)=\int_{Y}|f_{x}|\,d\nu. By (i) applied to ∣f∣|f|, G∈M+(X,F)G\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}) and ∫XG dΞΌ=∫XΓ—Y∣fβˆ£β€‰d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½)<∞\int_{X}G\,d\mu=\int_{X\times Y}|f|\,d(\mu\otimes\nu)<\infty. By the integrability criterion on (Y,G,Ξ½)(Y,\mathcal{G},\nu) (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (iv)), fx∈L1(Ξ½)f_{x}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\nu) if and only if G(x)<∞G(x)<\infty, so

N={x∈X:G(x)=∞},N=\{x\in X:G(x)=\infty\},

which lies in F\mathcal{F} and has ΞΌ(N)=0\mu(N)=0 by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (v).

The function II. Let P(x)=∫Y(fx)+ dΞ½P(x)=\int_{Y}(f_{x})^{+}\,d\nu and Q(x)=∫Y(fx)βˆ’β€‰dΞ½Q(x)=\int_{Y}(f_{x})^{-}\,d\nu. By (i) applied to f+f^{+} and fβˆ’f^{-}, P,Q∈M+(X,F)P,Q\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}) with

∫XP dΞΌ=∫XΓ—Yf+ d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½)<∞,∫XQ dΞΌ=∫XΓ—Yfβˆ’β€‰d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½)<∞.\int_{X}P\,d\mu=\int_{X\times Y}f^{+}\,d(\mu\otimes\nu)<\infty,\qquad\int_{X}Q\,d\mu=\int_{X\times Y}f^{-}\,d(\mu\otimes\nu)<\infty.

Since G=P+QG=P+Q (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (iv) on YY), P(x)P(x) and Q(x)Q(x) are real for xβˆ‰Nx\notin N. Let P~=P 1Xβˆ–N\tilde P=P\,\mathbf{1}_{X\setminus N} and Q~=Q 1Xβˆ–N\tilde Q=Q\,\mathbf{1}_{X\setminus N}; they are real-valued and, as 1Xβˆ–N∈M+(X,F)\mathbf{1}_{X\setminus N}\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}) (Basic Properties of the Integral of Nonnegative Measurable Maps (ii)), lie in M+(X,F)\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}) (Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (iii)), and so are measurable as real functions (Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (vii)). As P~=P\tilde P=P outside the null set NN, ∫XP~ dΞΌ=∫XP dΞΌ<∞\int_{X}\tilde P\,d\mu=\int_{X}P\,d\mu<\infty (The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (ii)), so P~∈L1(ΞΌ)\tilde P\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mu) with integral ∫XΓ—Yf+ d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½)\int_{X\times Y}f^{+}\,d(\mu\otimes\nu) (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (vi)); likewise Q~∈L1(ΞΌ)\tilde Q\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mu) with integral ∫XΓ—Yfβˆ’β€‰d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½)\int_{X\times Y}f^{-}\,d(\mu\otimes\nu).

For xβˆ‰Nx\notin N, the definition of the integral of fx∈L1(Ξ½)f_{x}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\nu) (Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral (iii)) gives I(x)=P(x)βˆ’Q(x)=P~(x)βˆ’Q~(x)I(x)=P(x)-Q(x)=\tilde P(x)-\tilde Q(x), and for x∈Nx\in N, I(x)=0=P~(x)βˆ’Q~(x)I(x)=0=\tilde P(x)-\tilde Q(x). Hence I=P~βˆ’Q~∈L1(ΞΌ)I=\tilde P-\tilde Q\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mu) and, by linearity (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (vii)) and the definition of the integral of ff (Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral (iii)),

∫XI dΞΌ=∫XP~ dΞΌβˆ’βˆ«XQ~ dΞΌ=∫XΓ—Yf+ d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½)βˆ’βˆ«XΓ—Yfβˆ’β€‰d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½)=∫XΓ—Yf d(ΞΌβŠ—Ξ½).\int_{X}I\,d\mu=\int_{X}\tilde P\,d\mu-\int_{X}\tilde Q\,d\mu=\int_{X\times Y}f^{+}\,d(\mu\otimes\nu)-\int_{X\times Y}f^{-}\,d(\mu\otimes\nu)=\int_{X\times Y}f\,d(\mu\otimes\nu).

Proof of (iii). This is the argument for (ii) with sections at yy in place of sections at xx, using the second equality of (i) in place of the first.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…