Proof of Euclidean Continuity Agrees with Metric Continuity for Real-Valued Functions
lemmalem:euclidean-metric-continuity-agree-2026aThroughout, .
Two elementary equivalences.
(i) For every and every with ,
Indeed, by the definition of the Euclidean distance, is the nonnegative square root of , so by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root we have and . From we get , so claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, applied with the two nonnegative elements and , gives if and only if . Substituting the displayed identity for yields the stated equivalence.
(ii) For all and every with ,
Indeed, by The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Line, where is the absolute value on . By claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field we have , and equals either or ; in the first case , and in the second case , using the field arithmetic of . From we get , so claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives if and only if , which is the stated equivalence.
Claim 1. By the Euclidean definition of continuity at a point, taken with and single coordinate function , the function is continuous at in the Euclidean sense exactly when for every with there exists with such that every satisfying satisfies .
By the metric definition of continuity at a point, applied with , , , and , the function is continuous at relative to exactly when for every with there exists with such that every satisfying satisfies . Since is a metric by Euclidean Distance is a Metric on , it is symmetric by the definition of a metric space, so .
Fix with and with . By (i), the hypotheses and are satisfied by exactly the same points ; by (ii), applied with and , the conclusions and hold for exactly the same points . Hence, for this and , the implication required by the Euclidean definition holds if and only if the implication required by the metric definition holds. As the two definitions quantify over and in the same way, the two notions of continuity at are equivalent. This proves claim 1.
Claim 2. Let . By claim 1 of the definition of a function of class , is of class on , regarded as a map into with and single coordinate function . The definition of a map of class requires in particular that each coordinate function be continuous at every point of in the Euclidean sense; hence is continuous at in the Euclidean sense.
Applying claim 1 with and with in place of , we conclude that is continuous at relative to as a map into . As was arbitrary, is continuous on in the sense of Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces.
By claim 2 of Semicontinuity Under Negation and Characterization of Continuity, applied with the metric space , with and with in place of the function there, continuity of at each relative to implies that is both upper semicontinuous at relative to and lower semicontinuous at relative to . Since this holds for every , the function is upper semicontinuous on and lower semicontinuous on . This proves claim 2.
Loading…
Prerequisites
3ac5920d-63ce-4232-891c-b228d3c3c4d7