Throughout, β£ β
β£ |\cdot| β£ β
β£ is the absolute value on R \mathbb{R} R , so that d R ( s , t ) = β£ s β t β£ d_{\mathbb{R}}(s,t)=|s-t| d R β ( s , t ) = β£ s β t β£ for all real s , t s,t s , t by The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Line .
Claim 1. Let x β ( a , b ] x\in(a,b] x β ( a , b ] . By claim 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative , applied with both metric spaces equal to the real line , A = [ a , b ] A=[a,b] A = [ a , b ] and B = [ a , x ] B=[a,x] B = [ a , x ] , the restriction f β£ [ a , x ] f|_{[a,x]} f β£ [ a , x ] β is continuous on [ a , x ] [a,x] [ a , x ] . Since a < x a<x a < x , claim 3 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval , applied on the interval [ a , x ] [a,x] [ a , x ] to the function f β£ [ a , x ] f|_{[a,x]} f β£ [ a , x ] β , shows that f β£ [ a , x ] f|_{[a,x]} f β£ [ a , x ] β is Riemann integrable on [ a , x ] [a,x] [ a , x ] . Hence β« a x f ( t ) β d t \int_a^x f(t)\,dt β« a x β f ( t ) d t is defined for every x β ( a , b ] x\in(a,b] x β ( a , b ] , and F F F is well defined on [ a , b ] [a,b] [ a , b ] , with F ( a ) = 0 F(a)=0 F ( a ) = 0 by the degenerate-interval convention of Mean-Square Riemann Integral of a Family of Random Variables .
Claim 2. By claim 4 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals , applied to Ο = f \varphi=f Ο = f on [ a , b ] [a,b] [ a , b ] , the function t β¦ β« a t f ( u ) β d u t\mapsto\int_a^t f(u)\,du t β¦ β« a t β f ( u ) d u on [ a , b ] [a,b] [ a , b ] is continuous on all of [ a , b ] [a,b] [ a , b ] . That function is exactly F F F , both being defined with the same degenerate-interval convention at t = a t=a t = a , so F F F is continuous on [ a , b ] [a,b] [ a , b ] .
Claim 3. Fix x β ( a , b ) x\in(a,b) x β ( a , b ) and a real Ξ΅ > 0 \varepsilon>0 Ξ΅ > 0 . Since f f f is continuous at x x x relative to [ a , b ] [a,b] [ a , b ] , there is a real Ξ΄ 0 > 0 \delta_0>0 Ξ΄ 0 β > 0 such that every u β [ a , b ] u\in[a,b] u β [ a , b ] with β£ u β x β£ = d R ( x , u ) < Ξ΄ 0 |u-x|=d_{\mathbb{R}}(x,u)<\delta_0 β£ u β x β£ = d R β ( x , u ) < Ξ΄ 0 β satisfies β£ f ( u ) β f ( x ) β£ < Ξ΅ / 2 |f(u)-f(x)|<\varepsilon/2 β£ f ( u ) β f ( x ) β£ < Ξ΅ /2 , that is,
f ( x ) β Ξ΅ / 2 < f ( u ) < f ( x ) + Ξ΅ / 2. f(x)-\varepsilon/2<f(u)<f(x)+\varepsilon/2 . f ( x ) β Ξ΅ /2 < f ( u ) < f ( x ) + Ξ΅ /2.
Set Ξ΄ = min β‘ { Ξ΄ 0 , β x β a , β b β x } \delta=\min\{\delta_0,\,x-a,\,b-x\} Ξ΄ = min { Ξ΄ 0 β , x β a , b β x } , which is positive since a < x < b a<x<b a < x < b . Let h h h be real with 0 < β£ h β£ < Ξ΄ 0<|h|<\delta 0 < β£ h β£ < Ξ΄ and x + h β [ a , b ] x+h\in[a,b] x + h β [ a , b ] .
Case h > 0 h>0 h > 0 . From h < Ξ΄ β€ b β x h<\delta\le b-x h < Ξ΄ β€ b β x we get a β€ x < x + h β€ b a\le x<x+h\le b a β€ x < x + h β€ b , and every u u u with x β€ u β€ x + h x\le u\le x+h x β€ u β€ x + h lies in [ a , b ] [a,b] [ a , b ] . By claim 4 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals , applied to Ο = f \varphi=f Ο = f with s = x s=x s = x and t = x + h t=x+h t = x + h ,
F ( x + h ) β F ( x ) = β« x x + h f ( u ) β d u . F(x+h)-F(x)=\int_x^{x+h}f(u)\,du . F ( x + h ) β F ( x ) = β« x x + h β f ( u ) d u .
By claim 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative the restriction of f f f to [ x , x + h ] [x,x+h] [ x , x + h ] is continuous on [ x , x + h ] [x,x+h] [ x , x + h ] , hence Riemann integrable on [ x , x + h ] [x,x+h] [ x , x + h ] by claim 3 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval . Every u β [ x , x + h ] u\in[x,x+h] u β [ x , x + h ] satisfies β£ u β x β£ = u β x β€ h < Ξ΄ β€ Ξ΄ 0 |u-x|=u-x\le h<\delta\le\delta_0 β£ u β x β£ = u β x β€ h < Ξ΄ β€ Ξ΄ 0 β , so the two-sided bound above gives f ( x ) β Ξ΅ / 2 β€ f ( u ) β€ f ( x ) + Ξ΅ / 2 f(x)-\varepsilon/2\le f(u)\le f(x)+\varepsilon/2 f ( x ) β Ξ΅ /2 β€ f ( u ) β€ f ( x ) + Ξ΅ /2 on [ x , x + h ] [x,x+h] [ x , x + h ] . By claim 2 of Uniform Partitions and Order Bounds for the Riemann Integral , applied to this restriction on [ x , x + h ] [x,x+h] [ x , x + h ] with m = f ( x ) β Ξ΅ / 2 m=f(x)-\varepsilon/2 m = f ( x ) β Ξ΅ /2 and M = f ( x ) + Ξ΅ / 2 M=f(x)+\varepsilon/2 M = f ( x ) + Ξ΅ /2 ,
( f ( x ) β Ξ΅ / 2 ) β h β€ F ( x + h ) β F ( x ) β€ ( f ( x ) + Ξ΅ / 2 ) β h . \bigl(f(x)-\varepsilon/2\bigr)\,h\le F(x+h)-F(x)\le\bigl(f(x)+\varepsilon/2\bigr)\,h . ( f ( x ) β Ξ΅ /2 ) h β€ F ( x + h ) β F ( x ) β€ ( f ( x ) + Ξ΅ /2 ) h .
Dividing by h > 0 h>0 h > 0 ,
β£ F ( x + h ) β F ( x ) h β f ( x ) β£ β€ Ξ΅ / 2 < Ξ΅ . \left|\frac{F(x+h)-F(x)}{h}-f(x)\right|\le\varepsilon/2<\varepsilon . β h F ( x + h ) β F ( x ) β β f ( x ) β β€ Ξ΅ /2 < Ξ΅ .
Case h < 0 h<0 h < 0 . From β£ h β£ = β h < Ξ΄ β€ x β a |h|=-h<\delta\le x-a β£ h β£ = β h < Ξ΄ β€ x β a we get a β€ x + h < x β€ b a\le x+h<x\le b a β€ x + h < x β€ b , and every u u u with x + h β€ u β€ x x+h\le u\le x x + h β€ u β€ x lies in [ a , b ] [a,b] [ a , b ] . By claim 4 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals , applied with s = x + h s=x+h s = x + h and t = x t=x t = x ,
F ( x ) β F ( x + h ) = β« x + h x f ( u ) β d u . F(x)-F(x+h)=\int_{x+h}^{x}f(u)\,du . F ( x ) β F ( x + h ) = β« x + h x β f ( u ) d u .
As before, the restriction of f f f to [ x + h , x ] [x+h,x] [ x + h , x ] is continuous on [ x + h , x ] [x+h,x] [ x + h , x ] , hence Riemann integrable, and every u β [ x + h , x ] u\in[x+h,x] u β [ x + h , x ] satisfies β£ u β x β£ = x β u β€ β h < Ξ΄ 0 |u-x|=x-u\le -h<\delta_0 β£ u β x β£ = x β u β€ β h < Ξ΄ 0 β , so f ( x ) β Ξ΅ / 2 β€ f ( u ) β€ f ( x ) + Ξ΅ / 2 f(x)-\varepsilon/2\le f(u)\le f(x)+\varepsilon/2 f ( x ) β Ξ΅ /2 β€ f ( u ) β€ f ( x ) + Ξ΅ /2 on [ x + h , x ] [x+h,x] [ x + h , x ] . By claim 2 of Uniform Partitions and Order Bounds for the Riemann Integral , applied on [ x + h , x ] [x+h,x] [ x + h , x ] , whose length is x β ( x + h ) = β h > 0 x-(x+h)=-h>0 x β ( x + h ) = β h > 0 ,
( f ( x ) β Ξ΅ / 2 ) ( β h ) β€ F ( x ) β F ( x + h ) β€ ( f ( x ) + Ξ΅ / 2 ) ( β h ) . \bigl(f(x)-\varepsilon/2\bigr)(-h)\le F(x)-F(x+h)\le\bigl(f(x)+\varepsilon/2\bigr)(-h) . ( f ( x ) β Ξ΅ /2 ) ( β h ) β€ F ( x ) β F ( x + h ) β€ ( f ( x ) + Ξ΅ /2 ) ( β h ) .
Dividing by β h > 0 -h>0 β h > 0 and noting that
F ( x + h ) β F ( x ) h = F ( x ) β F ( x + h ) β h , \frac{F(x+h)-F(x)}{h}=\frac{F(x)-F(x+h)}{-h}, h F ( x + h ) β F ( x ) β = β h F ( x ) β F ( x + h ) β ,
we again obtain
β£ F ( x + h ) β F ( x ) h β f ( x ) β£ β€ Ξ΅ / 2 < Ξ΅ . \left|\frac{F(x+h)-F(x)}{h}-f(x)\right|\le\varepsilon/2<\varepsilon . β h F ( x + h ) β F ( x ) β β f ( x ) β β€ Ξ΅ /2 < Ξ΅ .
In both cases, whenever 0 < β£ h β£ < Ξ΄ 0<|h|<\delta 0 < β£ h β£ < Ξ΄ and x + h β [ a , b ] x+h\in[a,b] x + h β [ a , b ] , the difference quotient of F F F at x x x lies within Ξ΅ \varepsilon Ξ΅ of f ( x ) f(x) f ( x ) . Since Ξ΅ > 0 \varepsilon>0 Ξ΅ > 0 was arbitrary and x x x is an interior point of the interval [ a , b ] [a,b] [ a , b ] , the function F F F is differentiable at x x x with F β² ( x ) = f ( x ) F'(x)=f(x) F β² ( x ) = f ( x ) . β \blacksquare β