TheoremBase

Proof

Throughout, N\mathbb{N} denotes the natural numbers with the order ≤\le and addition ++. The order ≤\le on R\mathbb{R} is in particular a total order, so it is reflexive, transitive and antisymmetric and any two real numbers are comparable; addition, additive inverses and the additive identity 00 are those of the underlying field, s−ts-t abbreviates s+(−t)s+(-t), and s<ts<t means s≤ts\le t and s≠ts\ne t. The absolute value is written ∣⋅∣|\cdot|, so that dR(s,t)=∣s−t∣d_{\mathbb{R}}(s,t)=|s-t|.

Let (xm)m∈N(x_m)_{m\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in R\mathbb{R} with xm∈[a,b]x_m\in[a,b] for every m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}. By the definition of the closed interval,

a≤xmandxm≤bfor every m∈N.a\le x_m\quad\text{and}\quad x_m\le b\qquad\text{for every } m\in\mathbb{N}.

We must produce a point of [a,b][a,b] that is the limit of a subsequence.

Step 1: an auxiliary set and its supremum. Let

E={t∈R : for every N∈N there is m∈N with N≤m and t≤xm}.E=\bigl\{t\in\mathbb{R}\ :\ \text{for every } N\in\mathbb{N}\text{ there is } m\in\mathbb{N}\text{ with } N\le m\text{ and } t\le x_m\bigr\}.

The set EE is nonempty: given N∈NN\in\mathbb{N}, statement 1 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers gives N≤NN\le N, and a≤xNa\le x_N, so the defining condition holds for t=at=a with the choice m=Nm=N; hence a∈Ea\in E.

The real number bb is an upper bound for EE: let t∈Et\in E. Applying the defining condition with N=1N=1, which lies in N\mathbb{N} by Natural Numbers, produces m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} with t≤xmt\le x_m, and xm≤bx_m\le b, so t≤bt\le b by transitivity.

Thus EE is nonempty and bounded above, so by the least upper bound property stated in The Real Numbers it has a least upper bound in R\mathbb{R}, which is unique by Uniqueness of the Supremum and of the Infimum. Write c=sup⁡Ec=\sup E.

Step 2: the supremum lies in [a,b][a,b]. Since a∈Ea\in E and cc is an upper bound for EE, we have a≤ca\le c. Since bb is an upper bound for EE and cc is the least upper bound, we have c≤bc\le b. Hence c∈[a,b]c\in[a,b].

Step 3: cc is a cluster point of (xm)m∈N(x_m)_{m\in\mathbb{N}}. Let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0<ε0<\varepsilon, and let N∈NN\in\mathbb{N}.

(a) A point of EE just below cc. By statement 3 of Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in R\mathbb{R}, applied to the nonempty set EE which is bounded above, there is t∈Et\in E with c−ε<tc-\varepsilon<t.

(b) A tail lying strictly below c+εc+\varepsilon. From 0<ε0<\varepsilon, statement 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 0+c<ε+c0+c<\varepsilon+c; by Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field we have 0+c=c0+c=c, and addition in a field is commutative, so c<c+εc<c+\varepsilon. If c+εc+\varepsilon belonged to EE then, cc being an upper bound for EE, we would have c+ε≤cc+\varepsilon\le c; together with c≤c+εc\le c+\varepsilon antisymmetry would give c+ε=cc+\varepsilon=c, contradicting c≠c+εc\ne c+\varepsilon. Hence c+ε∉Ec+\varepsilon\notin E.

Negating the condition defining EE at the point c+εc+\varepsilon, there is N0∈NN_0\in\mathbb{N} such that for every m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} with N0≤mN_0\le m the inequality c+ε≤xmc+\varepsilon\le x_m fails. For such an mm, comparability gives xm≤c+εx_m\le c+\varepsilon, and xm≠c+εx_m\ne c+\varepsilon because otherwise reflexivity would give c+ε≤xmc+\varepsilon\le x_m; hence

xm<c+εfor every m∈N with N0≤m.x_m<c+\varepsilon\qquad\text{for every } m\in\mathbb{N}\text{ with } N_0\le m.

(c) A single index past both thresholds. Put N1=N+N0N_1=N+N_0. Statement 6 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers gives N<N+N0N<N+N_0 and N0<N0+NN_0<N_0+N, and addition on N\mathbb{N} is commutative by statement 4 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers, so N0+N=N1N_0+N=N_1. By statement 1 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers we get N≤N1N\le N_1 and N0≤N1N_0\le N_1. Applying the defining condition of EE to tt with the threshold N1N_1 produces m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} with N1≤mN_1\le m and t≤xmt\le x_m; transitivity then gives N≤mN\le m and N0≤mN_0\le m.

(d) The estimate. From c−ε<tc-\varepsilon<t and t≤xmt\le x_m, mixed transitivity, statement 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, gives c−ε<xmc-\varepsilon<x_m; and N0≤mN_0\le m gives xm<c+εx_m<c+\varepsilon by part (b). Adding −c-c to both sides of each inequality, which preserves strict inequality by statement 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and simplifying (c−ε)+(−c)=−ε(c-\varepsilon)+(-c)=-\varepsilon and (c+ε)+(−c)=ε(c+\varepsilon)+(-c)=\varepsilon using Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field together with the commutativity and associativity of field addition, we obtain

−ε<xm−candxm−c<ε.-\varepsilon<x_m-c\quad\text{and}\quad x_m-c<\varepsilon .

Statement 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field therefore gives ∣xm−c∣<ε|x_m-c|<\varepsilon, that is, dR(xm,c)<εd_{\mathbb{R}}(x_m,c)<\varepsilon.

We have produced, for the given ε\varepsilon and NN, an index m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} with N≤mN\le m and dR(xm,c)<εd_{\mathbb{R}}(x_m,c)<\varepsilon. Since ε\varepsilon and NN were arbitrary, cc is a cluster point of (xm)m∈N(x_m)_{m\in\mathbb{N}} in (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}).

Step 4: extraction of a convergent subsequence. By Existence of a Sequence of Positive Real Numbers with Limit Zero there is a sequence (εk)k∈N(\varepsilon_k)_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in R\mathbb{R} with 0<εk0<\varepsilon_k for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} and with limit 00. Statement 1 of A Cluster Point of a Sequence in a Metric Space is the Limit of a Subsequence yields a strictly increasing sequence (nk)k∈N(n_k)_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in N\mathbb{N}, in the sense of Subsequence of a Sequence in a Set, with dR(xnk,c)<εkd_{\mathbb{R}}(x_{n_k},c)<\varepsilon_k for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, and statement 2 of the same result shows that the subsequence (xnk)k∈N(x_{n_k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} converges to cc in (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}).

Since c∈[a,b]c\in[a,b] by Step 2, the sequence (xm)m∈N(x_m)_{m\in\mathbb{N}} has a subsequence converging to a point of [a,b][a,b]. As (xm)m∈N(x_m)_{m\in\mathbb{N}} was an arbitrary sequence with all terms in [a,b][a,b], the set [a,b][a,b] is sequentially compact in (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…