TheoremBase

Proof of Subgradients near a Point of Twice Differentiability of a Convex Function, and Invariance of the Second-Order Expansion under Lipschitz Truncation

lemmalem:alexandrov-point-subgradients-rn-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 4,932 chars · 13 deps · depth 20 Reason: Stage 1M: proof of the subgradient expansion and truncation lemma.

Differentiability gives the single subgradient; testing the subgradient inequality in the direction of the error against the second-order expansion gives the first-order bound; continuity of the subdifferential and the agreement clause of the truncation give the rest.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, β=B\beta=\lVert B\rVert is the norm of BS(n)B\in\mathcal{S}(n), so that k(Bk)βk2|k\cdot(Bk)|\le\beta\lVert k\rVert^{2} for every kRnk\in\mathbb{R}^{n} by claim 2 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix, and 0β0\le\beta by claim 1 there.

Claim 1. By Basic Properties of Twice Differentiability at a Point §gradient, ff is differentiable at yy with derivative matrix the one-row matrix whose entry in column ii is the iith coordinate of pp. Since UU is open and convex and ff is convex on UU, Elementary Calculus of the Subdifferential of a Convex Function §gradient gives Uf(y)={g}\partial_{U}f(y)=\{g\} for the point gg whose iith coordinate is that entry, that is, g=pg=p (points of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} are equal when their coordinates are). Hence Uf(y)={p}\partial_{U}f(y)=\{p\}.

Claim 2. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0. Put t=min{1,ε(β+1)1}t=\min\{1,\varepsilon(\beta+1)^{-1}\}, which satisfies 0<t10<t\le1 and βtε\beta t\le\varepsilon, and η=110εt>0\eta=\tfrac{1}{10}\varepsilon t>0. By the definition of twice differentiability applied with η\eta there is δ0>0\delta_{0}>0 such that every hh with h<δ0\lVert h\rVert<\delta_{0} satisfies y+hUy+h\in U and

f(y+h)f(y)ph12h(Bh)ηh2.(1)\Bigl|f(y+h)-f(y)-p\cdot h-\tfrac12\,h\cdot(Bh)\Bigr|\le\eta\lVert h\rVert^{2}.\qquad(1)

Put δ=12δ0\delta=\tfrac12\delta_{0}. Let yRny'\in\mathbb{R}^{n} with yy<δ\lVert y'-y\rVert<\delta and put h=yyh=y'-y; then y=y+hUy'=y+h\in U since h<δ0\lVert h\rVert<\delta_{0}. Let qUf(y)q\in\partial_{U}f(y') and w=qpBhw=q-p-Bh. If h=0Rnh=0_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}, then y=yy'=y and q=pq=p by claim 1, so w=0Rnw=0_{\mathbb{R}^{n}} (as B0Rn=0RnB0_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}=0_{\mathbb{R}^{n}} by claim 1 of Linearity, Compatibility with the Matrix Product, and a Norm Bound for the Matrix-Vector Product) and the inequality holds. If w=0Rnw=0_{\mathbb{R}^{n}} there is nothing to prove. Otherwise h0Rnh\ne0_{\mathbb{R}^{n}} and w0Rnw\ne0_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}; put e=w1we=\lVert w\rVert^{-1}w and k=thek=t\lVert h\rVert e, so that k=th\lVert k\rVert=t\lVert h\rVert and wk=thww\cdot k=t\lVert h\rVert\lVert w\rVert. Then h+k(1+t)h2h<δ0\lVert h+k\rVert\le(1+t)\lVert h\rVert\le2\lVert h\rVert<\delta_{0}, so y+h+kUy+h+k\in U, and the subgradient inequality of Subdifferential of a Real-Valued Function on a Convex Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n §subdifferential at yy' gives f(y+h+k)f(y+h)+qkf(y+h+k)\ge f(y+h)+q\cdot k. Applying (1) at h+kh+k (upper bound) and at hh (lower bound), and expanding (h+k)(B(h+k))=h(Bh)+2(Bh)k+k(Bk)(h+k)\cdot(B(h+k))=h\cdot(Bh)+2(Bh)\cdot k+k\cdot(Bk) by linearity of the matrix-vector product (claim 1 of Linearity, Compatibility with the Matrix Product, and a Norm Bound for the Matrix-Vector Product), bilinearity and symmetry of the dot product (Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n), and the identity h(Bk)=k(Bh)h\cdot(Bk)=k\cdot(Bh), which holds because both sides equal i,j[n]hiBijkj\sum_{i,j\in[n]}h_{i}B_{ij}k_{j} by the double-sum formula of claim 4 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum and Bij=BjiB_{ij}=B_{ji}, we get

qkf(y+h+k)f(y+h)pk+(Bh)k+12k(Bk)+η(h+k2+h2).q\cdot k\le f(y+h+k)-f(y+h)\le p\cdot k+(Bh)\cdot k+\tfrac12\,k\cdot(Bk)+\eta\bigl(\lVert h+k\rVert^{2}+\lVert h\rVert^{2}\bigr).

Hence wk12βt2h2+5ηh2w\cdot k\le\tfrac12\beta t^{2}\lVert h\rVert^{2}+5\eta\lVert h\rVert^{2}, that is, thw(12βt2+5η)h2t\lVert h\rVert\lVert w\rVert\le(\tfrac12\beta t^{2}+5\eta)\lVert h\rVert^{2}. Dividing by the positive number tht\lVert h\rVert,

w(12βt+5ηt1)h(12ε+12ε)h=εyy.\lVert w\rVert\le\bigl(\tfrac12\beta t+5\eta t^{-1}\bigr)\lVert h\rVert\le\bigl(\tfrac12\varepsilon+\tfrac12\varepsilon\bigr)\lVert h\rVert=\varepsilon\lVert y'-y\rVert .

Claim 3. By claim 1, Uf(y)={p}\partial_{U}f(y)=\{p\}, so Elementary Calculus of the Subdifferential of a Convex Function §continuity applied with the positive number LpL-\lVert p\rVert gives δ1>0\delta_{1}>0 such that every yUy'\in U with yy<δ1\lVert y'-y\rVert<\delta_{1} and every qUf(y)q\in\partial_{U}f(y') satisfy qp<Lp\lVert q-p\rVert<L-\lVert p\rVert, hence qqp+p<L\lVert q\rVert\le\lVert q-p\rVert+\lVert p\rVert<L by the triangle inequality (claim 6 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n). Since UU is open there is r0>0r_{0}>0 with every yy' satisfying yy<r0\lVert y'-y\rVert<r_{0} in UU; put r=min{r0,δ1}r=\min\{r_{0},\delta_{1}\}. Let yy<r\lVert y'-y\rVert<r. Then yUy'\in U, Uf(y)\partial_{U}f(y') is nonempty by The Subdifferential of a Convex Function on an Open Convex Set is Nonempty, and any qq in it satisfies q<L\lVert q\rVert<L, so fL(y)=f(y)f^{L}(y')=f(y') by The Lipschitz Truncation of a Convex Function: a Global Lipschitz Convex Minorant Agreeing with It Where the Slope is Small §agreement.

Finally let ε>0\varepsilon>0, let δ\delta be as in the definition of twice differentiability of ff at yy with this ε\varepsilon, and put δ=min{δ,r}\delta'=\min\{\delta,r\}. For h<δ\lVert h\rVert<\delta' we have y+hRny+h\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, fL(y+h)=f(y+h)f^{L}(y+h)=f(y+h) and fL(y)=f(y)f^{L}(y)=f(y), so

fL(y+h)fL(y)ph12h(Bh)=f(y+h)f(y)ph12h(Bh)εh2.\Bigl|f^{L}(y+h)-f^{L}(y)-p\cdot h-\tfrac12\,h\cdot(Bh)\Bigr|=\Bigl|f(y+h)-f(y)-p\cdot h-\tfrac12\,h\cdot(Bh)\Bigr|\le\varepsilon\lVert h\rVert^{2}.

Since Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} is open and convex and fLf^{L} is defined on it, fLf^{L} is twice differentiable at yy with first-order coefficient pp and Hessian BB.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…