TheoremBase

Stability is proved by contradiction: Prokhorov's theorem and lower semicontinuity of the noise cost send a subsequence weakly to the unique optimal coupling, and expanding the integrand reduces the claim to convergence of the displacement pairing, proved by cylindrical approximation and truncation. Stability in the source glues each coupling with the optimal displacement coupling from the perturbed source and applies the stability claim to the composite couplings.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Throughout, W=Wa(μ,ν)W=W_{a}(\mu,\nu); more generally Wa(λ,λ′)W_{a}(\lambda,\lambda') is defined for all λ,λ′∈Pρa\lambda,\lambda'\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §connected, and Wa(λ,λ′)2≤Ia(π)W_{a}(\lambda,\lambda')^{2}\le I^{a}(\pi) for every π∈Πa(λ,λ′)\pi\in\Pi^{a}(\lambda,\lambda') by The Noise Wasserstein Distance §distance. We record four facts used repeatedly.

(F1) The coordinate maps π1,π2\pi_{1},\pi_{2} are Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §product-sigma; a pair of Borel maps into XX is a Borel map into X×XX\times X by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §pairing; a composite of measurable maps is measurable by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space; and continuous maps between metric spaces are Borel by claims 2 and 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space.

(F2) For a Borel map Φ\Phi defined on XX, X×XX\times X or X(3)X_{(3)} with values in XX or X×XX\times X, and a Borel probability measure λ\lambda on its domain, the push-forward Φ#λ\Phi_{\#}\lambda is the image measure B↦λ(Φ−1(B))B\mapsto\lambda(\Phi^{-1}(B)), a probability measure, and ∫g d(Φ#λ)=∫g∘Φ dλ\int g\,d(\Phi_{\#}\lambda)=\int g\circ\Phi\,d\lambda for every nonnegative Borel gg on the target, while a real-valued Borel gg is integrable against Φ#λ\Phi_{\#}\lambda exactly when g∘Φg\circ\Phi is integrable against λ\lambda, with the same identity; this is claims 1 and 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, as recorded in Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward. In particular (Ψ∘Φ)#λ=Ψ#(Φ#λ)(\Psi\circ\Phi)_{\#}\lambda=\Psi_{\#}(\Phi_{\#}\lambda) for Borel Ψ\Psi on the target of Φ\Phi, since (Ψ∘Φ)−1(B)=Φ−1(Ψ−1(B))(\Psi\circ\Phi)^{-1}(B)=\Phi^{-1}(\Psi^{-1}(B)).

(F3) XaX^{a} is a linear subspace of XX and a real Hilbert space by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §hilbert. For u,v∈Xau,v\in X^{a}, expanding with the symmetry and the linearity in the first argument of the inner product (Real Inner Product Space §inner-product) gives ∣u±v∣a2=∣u∣a2±2⟨u,v⟩a+∣v∣a2|u\pm v|_{a}^{2}=|u|_{a}^{2}\pm2\langle u,v\rangle_{a}+|v|_{a}^{2}, hence ∣u+v∣a2+∣u−v∣a2=2∣u∣a2+2∣v∣a2|u+v|_{a}^{2}+|u-v|_{a}^{2}=2|u|_{a}^{2}+2|v|_{a}^{2} and ∣u±v∣a2≤2∣u∣a2+2∣v∣a2|u\pm v|_{a}^{2}\le2|u|_{a}^{2}+2|v|_{a}^{2}.

(F4) If λ,λ′∈P(X)\lambda,\lambda'\in\mathcal{P}(X) and π∈Πa(λ,λ′)\pi\in\Pi^{a}(\lambda,\lambda'), then π∈Π(λ,λ′)\pi\in\Pi(\lambda,\lambda') by Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §couplings, so (π1)#π=λ(\pi_{1})_{\#}\pi=\lambda and (π2)#π=λ′(\pi_{2})_{\#}\pi=\lambda' by Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling, and π(Da)=1\pi(D_{a})=1 by Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §finite. By the definitions of nan_{a} in The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §borel and of cac_{a} in The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §pairs, ca(z)=na(y−x)=∣y−x∣a2c_{a}(z)=n_{a}(y-x)=|y-x|_{a}^{2} for z∈Daz\in D_{a}.

Step 1 (claim 1). Let TT be a noise-optimal map from μ\mu to ν\nu. By Noise-Optimal Maps and Uniquely Noise-Mapped Pairs §map, TT is Borel, T#μ=νT_{\#}\mu=\nu, T(x)−x∈XaT(x)-x\in X^{a} for every xx, ∫Xna(T(x)−x) μ(dx)<∞\int_{X}n_{a}(T(x)-x)\,\mu(dx)<\infty, the map h:X→Xah:X\to X^{a}, h(x)=T(x)−xh(x)=T(x)-x, is a representative of T−idT-\mathrm{id} with ∣h(x)∣a2=na(T(x)−x)|h(x)|_{a}^{2}=n_{a}(T(x)-x), and γT=(id,T)#μ\gamma_{T}=(\mathrm{id},T)_{\#}\mu is noise-optimal. By The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §operations, Couplings of Finite Noise Cost: the Support Bound, Swap, Displacement Couplings and Lower Semicontinuity of the Noise Cost §displacement (applied with S=TS=T) and Noise-Optimal Couplings §optimal,

∥T−id∥μ2=∫Xna(T(x)−x) μ(dx)=Ia(γT)=W2.\lVert T-\mathrm{id}\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\int_{X}n_{a}\bigl(T(x)-x\bigr)\,\mu(dx)=I^{a}(\gamma_{T})=W^{2}.

Step 2 (claim 2: the optimal coupling and the pairing along it). Assume the hypotheses of claim 2, and let hh and γT\gamma_{T} be as in Step 1. By Noise-Optimal Maps and Uniquely Noise-Mapped Pairs §uniquely-mapped there is a noise-optimal map T0T_{0} from μ\mu to ν\nu such that every noise-optimal coupling of μ\mu and ν\nu equals (id,T0)#μ(\mathrm{id},T_{0})_{\#}\mu. Since γT\gamma_{T} is noise-optimal, γT=(id,T0)#μ\gamma_{T}=(\mathrm{id},T_{0})_{\#}\mu; hence every noise-optimal coupling of μ\mu and ν\nu equals γT\gamma_{T}. Moreover, Noise Displacement and Cross Pairings Along Couplings: Bounds, Linearity, Displacement Couplings, Polarisation and a Vanishing Criterion §displacement, applied with this μ\mu, the representative hh and t=1t=1, has S1(x)=x+h(x)=T(x)S_{1}(x)=x+h(x)=T(x), so its coupling π1\pi_{1} is γT\gamma_{T}, and it gives Ia(γT)=∥h∥μ2I^{a}(\gamma_{T})=\lVert h\rVert_{\mu}^{2} and Ja(η,γT)=⟨η,h⟩μ\mathcal{J}^{a}(\eta,\gamma_{T})=\langle\eta,h\rangle_{\mu} for every η∈L2(μ;Xa)\eta\in L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}); in particular Ja(h,γT)=∥h∥μ2\mathcal{J}^{a}(h,\gamma_{T})=\lVert h\rVert_{\mu}^{2}, the norm of L2(μ;Xa)L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}) being that of its inner product by The Space of Square-Integrable Hilbert-Valued Maps is a Real Hilbert Space: Coordinates and Synthesis §hilbert.

Step 3 (claim 2: an expansion). For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} let An=∫X×Xna(T(x)−y) γn(dz)A_{n}=\int_{X\times X}n_{a}(T(x)-y)\,\gamma_{n}(dz), a nonnegative real number as shown in the statement, and let δn\delta_{n} be the displacement field of Noise Displacement and Cross Pairings Along Couplings: Bounds, Linearity, Displacement Couplings, Polarisation and a Vanishing Criterion §displacement-field for γn\gamma_{n}. For z∈Daz\in D_{a} one has δn(z)=y−x\delta_{n}(z)=y-x and T(x)−y=h(x)−δn(z)∈XaT(x)-y=h(x)-\delta_{n}(z)\in X^{a}, so by (F3) and (F4)

na(T(x)−y)=∣h(x)−δn(z)∣a2=∣h(x)∣a2−2⟨h(x),δn(z)⟩a+ca(z).n_{a}\bigl(T(x)-y\bigr)=|h(x)-\delta_{n}(z)|_{a}^{2}=|h(x)|_{a}^{2}-2\langle h(x),\delta_{n}(z)\rangle_{a}+c_{a}(z).

Call the right-hand side Gn(z)G_{n}(z), defined for every zz. The function z↦∣h(π1z)∣a2z\mapsto|h(\pi_{1}z)|_{a}^{2} is nonnegative and Borel by (F1) and Measurable Maps into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Norms, Inner Products and Linear Combinations, Synthesis from Coordinates, Square-Integrability, and Almost-Everywhere Equality §operations, and its integral against γn\gamma_{n} is ∫X∣h∣a2 dμ=∥h∥μ2<∞\int_{X}|h|_{a}^{2}\,d\mu=\lVert h\rVert_{\mu}^{2}<\infty by (F2) and (F4), so it is integrable by the criterion of Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §integral; the function z↦⟨h(x),δn(z)⟩az\mapsto\langle h(x),\delta_{n}(z)\rangle_{a} is Borel and integrable with integral Ja(h,γn)\mathcal{J}^{a}(h,\gamma_{n}) by Noise Displacement and Cross Pairings Along Couplings: Bounds, Linearity, Displacement Couplings, Polarisation and a Vanishing Criterion §pairing; and cac_{a} is nonnegative and Borel with integral Ia(γn)<∞I^{a}(\gamma_{n})<\infty by Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §cost. By Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable, GnG_{n} is integrable with ∫Gn dγn=∥h∥μ2−2Ja(h,γn)+Ia(γn)\int G_{n}\,d\gamma_{n}=\lVert h\rVert_{\mu}^{2}-2\mathcal{J}^{a}(h,\gamma_{n})+I^{a}(\gamma_{n}). Since γn(Da)=1\gamma_{n}(D_{a})=1 by (F4), the two Borel functions z↦na(T(x)−y)z\mapsto n_{a}(T(x)-y) and GnG_{n} agree γn\gamma_{n}-almost everywhere, and The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison together with Step 1 gives

An=W2−2Ja(h,γn)+Ia(γn)(n∈N).A_{n}=W^{2}-2\mathcal{J}^{a}(h,\gamma_{n})+I^{a}(\gamma_{n})\qquad(n\in\mathbb{N}).

Step 4 (claim 2: convergence of the pairing). We show: if (nj)j∈N(n_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} is strictly increasing in N\mathbb{N} and γnj⇒γT\gamma_{n_{j}}\Rightarrow\gamma_{T}, then lim⁡j→∞Ja(h,γnj)=∥h∥μ2\lim_{j\to\infty}\mathcal{J}^{a}(h,\gamma_{n_{j}})=\lVert h\rVert_{\mu}^{2}. The convergent real sequence (Ia(γn))n∈N(I^{a}(\gamma_{n}))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} is bounded, so there is a real β\beta with Ia(γn)≤βI^{a}(\gamma_{n})\le\beta for every nn; then W2≤Ia(γn)≤βW^{2}\le I^{a}(\gamma_{n})\le\beta, and Ia(γT)=W2≤βI^{a}(\gamma_{T})=W^{2}\le\beta by Step 1. Let ε′>0\varepsilon'>0. The order of choices is: first ε′\varepsilon', then ζ\zeta, then KK, then φ1,…,φK\varphi_{1},\dots,\varphi_{K} (and with them gg, BB and CC), then MM, then j0j_{0}.

Step 4a (an approximating field). Let ζ=ε′/(3(β1/2+∥h∥μ+1))>0\zeta=\varepsilon'/(3(\beta^{1/2}+\lVert h\rVert_{\mu}+1))>0. By The Space of Square-Integrable Hilbert-Valued Maps is a Real Hilbert Space: Coordinates and Synthesis §coordinates, applied with E=XaE=X^{a} and the basis (fk)k∈N(f_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} of The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §basis, the coordinates hk∈L2(μ)h_{k}\in L^{2}(\mu) of hh satisfy ∥h∥μ2=∑k=1∞∥hk∥L2(μ)2\lVert h\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\lVert h_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\mu)}^{2}, a convergent series; choose K∈NK\in\mathbb{N} with ∑k>K∥hk∥L2(μ)2<ζ2/2\sum_{k>K}\lVert h_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\mu)}^{2}<\zeta^{2}/2. For each k≤Kk\le K, Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §density provides φk∈FCb1(X)\varphi_{k}\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) whose class satisfies ∥hk−φk∥L2(μ)2<ζ2/(2K)\lVert h_{k}-\varphi_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\mu)}^{2}<\zeta^{2}/(2K), because the open ball of radius ζ/2K\zeta/\sqrt{2K} about hkh_{k} is a nonempty open set and therefore meets the dense set of classes of bounded C1C^{1} cylindrical functions (dense in the sense of Real Hilbert Space §topology). By Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §bounded-borel each φk\varphi_{k} is Borel and bounded; fix a real B≥0B\ge0 with ∣φk(x)∣≤B|\varphi_{k}(x)|\le B for all k≤Kk\le K and x∈Xx\in X. Put gk=φkg_{k}=\varphi_{k} for k≤Kk\le K and gk=0g_{k}=0 for k>Kk>K; for every xx the series ∑kgk(x)2\sum_{k}g_{k}(x)^{2} has only finitely many nonzero terms and converges. By Measurable Maps into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Norms, Inner Products and Linear Combinations, Synthesis from Coordinates, Square-Integrability, and Almost-Everywhere Equality §synthesis the map g:X→Xag:X\to X^{a}, g(x)=∑k=1Kφk(x)fkg(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{K}\varphi_{k}(x)f_{k}, is measurable with coordinates ⟨g(x),fk⟩a=gk(x)\langle g(x),f_{k}\rangle_{a}=g_{k}(x), and by Measurable Maps into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Norms, Inner Products and Linear Combinations, Synthesis from Coordinates, Square-Integrability, and Almost-Everywhere Equality §operations ∣g(x)∣a2=∑k=1Kφk(x)2≤KB2|g(x)|_{a}^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{K}\varphi_{k}(x)^{2}\le KB^{2}, so gg is square-integrable with respect to μ\mu by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative and claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, the latter giving ∫XKB2 dμ=KB2μ(X)=KB2\int_{X}KB^{2}\,d\mu=KB^{2}\mu(X)=KB^{2}. Its class, again written gg, has coordinates gkg_{k} (the class of φk\varphi_{k} for k≤Kk\le K, and 00 for k>Kk>K). By The Space of Square-Integrable Hilbert-Valued Maps is a Real Hilbert Space: Coordinates and Synthesis §coordinates, (h−g)k=hk−gk(h-g)_{k}=h_{k}-g_{k} and

∥h−g∥μ2=∑k=1K∥hk−φk∥L2(μ)2+∑k>K∥hk∥L2(μ)2<ζ22+ζ22=ζ2.\lVert h-g\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{K}\lVert h_{k}-\varphi_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\mu)}^{2}+\sum_{k>K}\lVert h_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\mu)}^{2}<\frac{\zeta^{2}}{2}+\frac{\zeta^{2}}{2}=\zeta^{2}.

Step 4b (replacing hh by gg). By Noise Displacement and Cross Pairings Along Couplings: Bounds, Linearity, Displacement Couplings, Polarisation and a Vanishing Criterion §linear and Noise Displacement and Cross Pairings Along Couplings: Bounds, Linearity, Displacement Couplings, Polarisation and a Vanishing Criterion §bound, for every nn,

∣Ja(h,γn)−Ja(g,γn)∣=∣Ja(h−g,γn)∣≤∥h−g∥μIa(γn)≤ζβ1/2,\bigl|\mathcal{J}^{a}(h,\gamma_{n})-\mathcal{J}^{a}(g,\gamma_{n})\bigr|=\bigl|\mathcal{J}^{a}(h-g,\gamma_{n})\bigr|\le\lVert h-g\rVert_{\mu}\sqrt{I^{a}(\gamma_{n})}\le\zeta\beta^{1/2},

and likewise, by Step 2, ∣Ja(g,γT)−∥h∥μ2∣=∣Ja(g−h,γT)∣≤∥g−h∥μIa(γT)≤ζ∥h∥μ\bigl|\mathcal{J}^{a}(g,\gamma_{T})-\lVert h\rVert_{\mu}^{2}\bigr|=\bigl|\mathcal{J}^{a}(g-h,\gamma_{T})\bigr|\le\lVert g-h\rVert_{\mu}\sqrt{I^{a}(\gamma_{T})}\le\zeta\lVert h\rVert_{\mu}.

Step 4c (a continuous integrand). For k≤Kk\le K, by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical there are mk∈Nm_{k}\in\mathbb{N} and ψk∈Cb1(Rmk)\psi_{k}\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{m_{k}}) with φk=ψk∘pmk\varphi_{k}=\psi_{k}\circ p_{m_{k}}. Define F:X×X→RF:X\times X\to\mathbb{R} by

F(z)=∑k=1Kak−1/2 φk(x) (yk−xk).F(z)=\sum_{k=1}^{K}a_{k}^{-1/2}\,\varphi_{k}(x)\,(y_{k}-x_{k}).

FF is continuous on (X×X,d)(X\times X,d): each ψk\psi_{k} is continuous by claims 1 and 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, the class Cb1C^{1}_{b} consisting of C1C^{1} functions by Bounded Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded; the maps pmkp_{m_{k}} and the coordinate functions x↦xkx\mapsto x_{k} are Lipschitz by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, and π1,π2\pi_{1},\pi_{2} are Lipschitz with constant 11, being linear with ∣πiz∣≤∣z∣|\pi_{i}z|\le|z| by Properties of the Product of Two Real Inner Product Spaces §coordinates, so all of these are continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous; composites of continuous maps are continuous by claim 3 of Semicontinuity and Continuity Under Composition with a Continuous Map; and sums, products and real multiples of continuous real functions are continuous by Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space §on-set. Hence FF is Borel by (F1).

Let π∈Πa(μ,ν)\pi\in\Pi^{a}(\mu,\nu) with displacement field δ\delta. For z∈Daz\in D_{a}, δ(z)=y−x∈Xa\delta(z)=y-x\in X^{a} and, by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §basis and the linearity of u↦⟨u,ek⟩u\mapsto\langle u,e_{k}\rangle, ⟨fk,y−x⟩a=ak−1/2(yk−xk)\langle f_{k},y-x\rangle_{a}=a_{k}^{-1/2}(y_{k}-x_{k}); so the linearity and symmetry of ⟨⋅,⋅⟩a\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{a} give ⟨g(x),δ(z)⟩a=∑k=1Kφk(x)⟨fk,y−x⟩a=F(z)\langle g(x),\delta(z)\rangle_{a}=\sum_{k=1}^{K}\varphi_{k}(x)\langle f_{k},y-x\rangle_{a}=F(z). As π(Da)=1\pi(D_{a})=1 by (F4), the integrand of Noise Displacement and Cross Pairings Along Couplings: Bounds, Linearity, Displacement Couplings, Polarisation and a Vanishing Criterion §pairing for gg and π\pi agrees with FF π\pi-almost everywhere, and The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison shows that FF is integrable against π\pi with Ja(g,π)=∫F dπ\mathcal{J}^{a}(g,\pi)=\int F\,d\pi. Further, ∣yk−xk∣≤∣y−x∣|y_{k}-x_{k}|\le|y-x| by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, so with C=B∑k=1Kak−1/2C=B\sum_{k=1}^{K}a_{k}^{-1/2} one has F(z)2≤C2∣π1(z)−π2(z)∣2F(z)^{2}\le C^{2}|\pi_{1}(z)-\pi_{2}(z)|^{2} for every zz, and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative, Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §cost and Couplings of Finite Noise Cost: the Support Bound, Swap, Displacement Couplings and Lower Semicontinuity of the Noise Cost §support-bound give

∫X×XF2 dπ≤C2I(π)≤C2aˉ Ia(π).\int_{X\times X}F^{2}\,d\pi\le C^{2}I(\pi)\le C^{2}\bar{a}\,I^{a}(\pi).

For π=γn\pi=\gamma_{n} and for π=γT\pi=\gamma_{T} the right-hand side is at most C2aˉβC^{2}\bar{a}\beta.

Step 4d (truncation). For a real M>0M>0 let clM(s)=max⁡{−M,min⁡{M,s}}\mathrm{cl}_{M}(s)=\max\{-M,\min\{M,s\}\} for s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R}. Elementary order arithmetic gives ∣clM(s)−clM(s′)∣≤∣s−s′∣|\mathrm{cl}_{M}(s)-\mathrm{cl}_{M}(s')|\le|s-s'|, ∣clM(s)∣≤M|\mathrm{cl}_{M}(s)|\le M and ∣s−clM(s)∣≤s2/M|s-\mathrm{cl}_{M}(s)|\le s^{2}/M for all s,s′s,s' (the last because the left side is 00 when ∣s∣≤M|s|\le M and is ∣s∣−M<∣s∣<s2/M|s|-M<|s|<s^{2}/M otherwise). Choose M>0M>0 with C2aˉβ/M≤ε′/12C^{2}\bar{a}\beta/M\le\varepsilon'/12. The function FM=clM∘FF_{M}=\mathrm{cl}_{M}\circ F is continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous and claim 3 of Semicontinuity and Continuity Under Composition with a Continuous Map, bounded by MM, and Borel by (F1), hence integrable against every Borel probability measure on X×XX\times X by claim 6(b) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. For π∈{γn:n∈N}∪{γT}\pi\in\{\gamma_{n}:n\in\mathbb{N}\}\cup\{\gamma_{T}\}, Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative together with Step 4c give

∣∫F dπ−∫FM dπ∣≤∫∣F−FM∣ dπ≤1M∫F2 dπ≤C2aˉβM≤ε′12.\Bigl|\int F\,d\pi-\int F_{M}\,d\pi\Bigr|\le\int|F-F_{M}|\,d\pi\le\frac{1}{M}\int F^{2}\,d\pi\le\frac{C^{2}\bar{a}\beta}{M}\le\frac{\varepsilon'}{12}.

Step 4e (weak convergence). Since FMF_{M} is bounded and continuous and γnj⇒γT\gamma_{n_{j}}\Rightarrow\gamma_{T}, Weak Convergence of Finite Borel Measures on a Metric Space gives lim⁡j∫FM dγnj=∫FM dγT\lim_{j}\int F_{M}\,d\gamma_{n_{j}}=\int F_{M}\,d\gamma_{T}; choose j0j_{0} with ∣∫FM dγnj−∫FM dγT∣<ε′/6|\int F_{M}\,d\gamma_{n_{j}}-\int F_{M}\,d\gamma_{T}|<\varepsilon'/6 for every j≥j0j\ge j_{0}. By Steps 4c and 4d, for j≥j0j\ge j_{0},

∣Ja(g,γnj)−Ja(g,γT)∣≤ε′12+ε′6+ε′12=ε′3.\bigl|\mathcal{J}^{a}(g,\gamma_{n_{j}})-\mathcal{J}^{a}(g,\gamma_{T})\bigr|\le\frac{\varepsilon'}{12}+\frac{\varepsilon'}{6}+\frac{\varepsilon'}{12}=\frac{\varepsilon'}{3}.

Combining with Step 4b, for j≥j0j\ge j_{0},

∣Ja(h,γnj)−∥h∥μ2∣≤ζβ1/2+ε′3+ζ∥h∥μ<ε′3+ε′3<ε′,\bigl|\mathcal{J}^{a}(h,\gamma_{n_{j}})-\lVert h\rVert_{\mu}^{2}\bigr|\le\zeta\beta^{1/2}+\frac{\varepsilon'}{3}+\zeta\lVert h\rVert_{\mu}<\frac{\varepsilon'}{3}+\frac{\varepsilon'}{3}<\varepsilon',

by the choice of ζ\zeta. As ε′>0\varepsilon'>0 was arbitrary, the assertion of Step 4 follows.

Step 5 (claim 2: conclusion). Suppose, for a contradiction, that (An)n∈N(A_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} does not converge to 00. Since An≥0A_{n}\ge0, there are a real ε>0\varepsilon>0 and a strictly increasing sequence (nj)j∈N(n_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} with Anj≥εA_{n_{j}}\ge\varepsilon for every jj. The set Π(μ,ν)\Pi(\mu,\nu) is tight in X×XX\times X by Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Tightness, Closedness under Weak Convergence, and Lower Semicontinuity of the Quadratic Cost §tight, hence so is its subset {γnj:j∈N}\{\gamma_{n_{j}}:j\in\mathbb{N}\}, directly from Tight Family of Borel Measures on a Metric Space §tight; thus the sequence (γnj)j(\gamma_{n_{j}})_{j} is tight in the sense of Tight Family of Borel Measures on a Metric Space §sequence. By Prokhorov's Theorem on a Metric Space: a Tight Sequence of Borel Probability Measures Has a Weakly Convergent Subsequence §subsequence, applied on the metric space (X×X,d)(X\times X,d), there are a strictly increasing (ji)i∈N(j_{i})_{i\in\mathbb{N}} and γ∈P(X×X)\gamma\in\mathcal{P}(X\times X) with γmi⇒γ\gamma_{m_{i}}\Rightarrow\gamma, where mi=njim_{i}=n_{j_{i}} is strictly increasing. The constant sequences with terms μ\mu and ν\nu converge weakly to μ\mu and ν\nu directly from Weak Convergence of Finite Borel Measures on a Metric Space, each γmi\gamma_{m_{i}} lies in Πa(μ,ν)\Pi^{a}(\mu,\nu), and (Ia(γmi))i(I^{a}(\gamma_{m_{i}}))_{i} converges to W2W^{2}, being a subsequence of a sequence converging to W2W^{2}, so it is bounded, and its limit inferior, in the sense of Limit Inferior of a Bounded Sequence of Real Numbers, equals its limit W2W^{2} by claim 5 of Basic Properties of the Limit Inferior and Limit Superior of a Bounded Real Sequence. Hence Couplings of Finite Noise Cost: the Support Bound, Swap, Displacement Couplings and Lower Semicontinuity of the Noise Cost §lsc gives γ∈Πa(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi^{a}(\mu,\nu) with Ia(γ)≤W2I^{a}(\gamma)\le W^{2}, while W2≤Ia(γ)W^{2}\le I^{a}(\gamma) by The Noise Wasserstein Distance §distance. So γ\gamma is noise-optimal by Noise-Optimal Couplings §optimal, and γ=γT\gamma=\gamma_{T} by Step 2. Step 4, applied to (mi)i(m_{i})_{i}, gives lim⁡iJa(h,γmi)=∥h∥μ2=W2\lim_{i}\mathcal{J}^{a}(h,\gamma_{m_{i}})=\lVert h\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=W^{2} (Step 1), and Step 3 gives

lim⁡i→∞Ami=W2−2W2+W2=0,\lim_{i\to\infty}A_{m_{i}}=W^{2}-2W^{2}+W^{2}=0,

contradicting Ami≥ε>0A_{m_{i}}\ge\varepsilon>0 for every ii. Hence lim⁡nAn=0\lim_{n}A_{n}=0, which is claim 2.

Step 6 (claim 3: a gluing). Assume the hypotheses of claim 3. By Strong and Weak Convergence of Noise Fields Along Couplings of Vanishing Noise Cost §couplings, applied with μ\mu in place of its ν\nu and (μn)(\mu_{n}) in place of its (νn)(\nu_{n}), γn∈Πa(μn,μ)\gamma_{n}\in\Pi^{a}(\mu_{n},\mu) for every nn and lim⁡nIa(γn)=0\lim_{n}I^{a}(\gamma_{n})=0. Fix nn. Let τ:X×X→X×X\tau:X\times X\to X\times X, τ(x,y)=(y,x)\tau(x,y)=(y,x), be the swap map of Couplings of Finite Noise Cost: the Support Bound, Swap, Displacement Couplings and Lower Semicontinuity of the Noise Cost §swap (there written σ\sigma); it is Borel by (F1), and that clause gives γn′=τ#γn∈Πa(μ,μn)\gamma'_{n}=\tau_{\#}\gamma_{n}\in\Pi^{a}(\mu,\mu_{n}) with Ia(γn′)=Ia(γn)I^{a}(\gamma'_{n})=I^{a}(\gamma_{n}). By Noise-Optimal Maps and Uniquely Noise-Mapped Pairs §map, applied to μn,ν∈Pρa\mu_{n},\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, the coupling θn=(id,Sn)#μn\theta_{n}=(\mathrm{id},S_{n})_{\#}\mu_{n} belongs to Πa(μn,ν)\Pi^{a}(\mu_{n},\nu) and is noise-optimal, so Ia(θn)=Wa(μn,ν)2I^{a}(\theta_{n})=W_{a}(\mu_{n},\nu)^{2} by Noise-Optimal Couplings §optimal. The measures μ,μn,ν\mu,\mu_{n},\nu belong to P2(X)\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §moments, so Gluing Two Couplings on a Hilbert Space over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Triangle Inequalities for the Quadratic and Noise Costs §glued, applied with λ=μn\lambda=\mu_{n}, π12=γn′\pi_{12}=\gamma'_{n} and π23=θn\pi_{23}=\theta_{n}, provides σn∈P(X(3))\sigma_{n}\in\mathcal{P}(X_{(3)}) with (q1,q2)#σn=γn′(q_{1},q_{2})_{\#}\sigma_{n}=\gamma'_{n} and (q2,q3)#σn=θn(q_{2},q_{3})_{\#}\sigma_{n}=\theta_{n}. Let κn=(q1,q3)#σn\kappa_{n}=(q_{1},q_{3})_{\#}\sigma_{n}. By Gluing Two Couplings on a Hilbert Space over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Triangle Inequalities for the Quadratic and Noise Costs §noise-triangle, κn∈Πa(μ,ν)\kappa_{n}\in\Pi^{a}(\mu,\nu) and Ia(κn)≤Ia(γn)+Wa(μn,ν)\sqrt{I^{a}(\kappa_{n})}\le\sqrt{I^{a}(\gamma_{n})}+W_{a}(\mu_{n},\nu), using Wa(μn,ν)2=Wa(μn,ν)\sqrt{W_{a}(\mu_{n},\nu)^{2}}=W_{a}(\mu_{n},\nu) by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root.

Step 7 (claim 3: the composite couplings are nearly optimal). Let rn=Ia(γn)r_{n}=\sqrt{I^{a}(\gamma_{n})}; since Ia(γn)→0I^{a}(\gamma_{n})\to0, also rn→0r_{n}\to0 (given ε>0\varepsilon>0, eventually Ia(γn)<ε2I^{a}(\gamma_{n})<\varepsilon^{2}, hence rn<εr_{n}<\varepsilon). By The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §triangle, applied to μn,μ,ν\mu_{n},\mu,\nu, and by Wa(μn,μ)2≤Ia(γn)W_{a}(\mu_{n},\mu)^{2}\le I^{a}(\gamma_{n}), one has Wa(μn,ν)≤Wa(μn,μ)+W≤rn+WW_{a}(\mu_{n},\nu)\le W_{a}(\mu_{n},\mu)+W\le r_{n}+W. With Step 6 and W2≤Ia(κn)W^{2}\le I^{a}(\kappa_{n}),

W2≤Ia(κn)≤(W+2rn)2=W2+4rnW+4rn2,W^{2}\le I^{a}(\kappa_{n})\le(W+2r_{n})^{2}=W^{2}+4r_{n}W+4r_{n}^{2},

so lim⁡nIa(κn)=W2\lim_{n}I^{a}(\kappa_{n})=W^{2}. Since (μ,ν)(\mu,\nu) is uniquely noise-mapped and SS is a noise-optimal map from μ\mu to ν\nu, claim 2 (Steps 2 to 5), applied with T=ST=S and the sequence (κn)n(\kappa_{n})_{n}, gives

lim⁡n→∞∫X×Xna(S(x)−y) κn(dz)=0.\lim_{n\to\infty}\int_{X\times X}n_{a}\bigl(S(x)-y\bigr)\,\kappa_{n}(dz)=0 .

By (F2), with the nonnegative Borel function z↦na(S(x)−y)z\mapsto n_{a}(S(x)-y) of claim 2 and the Borel map (q1,q3)(q_{1},q_{3}), this integral equals ∫X(3)na(S(q1w)−q3w) σn(dw)\int_{X_{(3)}}n_{a}(S(q_{1}w)-q_{3}w)\,\sigma_{n}(dw).

Step 8 (claim 3: a set of full measure). Let En={z∈X×X:y=Sn(x)}E_{n}=\{z\in X\times X:y=S_{n}(x)\}, the preimage of the closed set {0X}\{0_{X}\} under the Borel map z↦y−Sn(x)z\mapsto y-S_{n}(x) (Borel by (F1) and Measurable Maps into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Norms, Inner Products and Linear Combinations, Synthesis from Coordinates, Square-Integrability, and Almost-Everywhere Equality §operations applied with E=XE=X), so EnE_{n} is Borel by claim 1 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. Since (id,Sn)−1(En)=X(\mathrm{id},S_{n})^{-1}(E_{n})=X, (F2) gives σn((q2,q3)−1(En))=θn(En)=μn(X)=1\sigma_{n}((q_{2},q_{3})^{-1}(E_{n}))=\theta_{n}(E_{n})=\mu_{n}(X)=1. Also σn((q1,q2)−1(Da))=γn′(Da)=1\sigma_{n}((q_{1},q_{2})^{-1}(D_{a}))=\gamma'_{n}(D_{a})=1 by (F4). Let Nn=(q2,q3)−1(En)∩(q1,q2)−1(Da)N_{n}=(q_{2},q_{3})^{-1}(E_{n})\cap(q_{1},q_{2})^{-1}(D_{a}); then σn(Nn)=1\sigma_{n}(N_{n})=1 by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §null-union. For w∈Nnw\in N_{n} one has q3w=Sn(q2w)q_{3}w=S_{n}(q_{2}w) and v:=q2w−q1w∈Xav:=q_{2}w-q_{1}w\in X^{a}; further S(q1w)−q1w∈XaS(q_{1}w)-q_{1}w\in X^{a} and Sn(q2w)−q2w∈XaS_{n}(q_{2}w)-q_{2}w\in X^{a} by Noise-Optimal Maps and Uniquely Noise-Mapped Pairs §map, so u:=S(q1w)−q3w=(S(q1w)−q1w)−v−(Sn(q2w)−q2w)∈Xau:=S(q_{1}w)-q_{3}w=(S(q_{1}w)-q_{1}w)-v-(S_{n}(q_{2}w)-q_{2}w)\in X^{a} by (F3).

Step 9 (claim 3: the discrepancy). Let qn∗(x)=Sn(x)−xq_{n}^{\ast}(x)=S_{n}(x)-x and q∗(y)=S(y)−yq^{\ast}(y)=S(y)-y be the representatives of Sn−id∈L2(μn;Xa)S_{n}-\mathrm{id}\in L^{2}(\mu_{n};X^{a}) and S−id∈L2(μ;Xa)S-\mathrm{id}\in L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}) given by Noise-Optimal Maps and Uniquely Noise-Mapped Pairs §map. By Noise Displacement and Cross Pairings Along Couplings: Bounds, Linearity, Displacement Couplings, Polarisation and a Vanishing Criterion §discrepancy, applied with μn\mu_{n} and μ\mu in place of its ν\nu and μ\mu and with γn∈Π(μn,μ)\gamma_{n}\in\Pi(\mu_{n},\mu), the function Δn(z)=∣qn∗(x)−q∗(y)∣a2\Delta_{n}(z)=|q_{n}^{\ast}(x)-q^{\ast}(y)|_{a}^{2} is nonnegative, Borel and γn\gamma_{n}-integrable, and its integral is the discrepancy occurring in Strong and Weak Convergence of Noise Fields Along Couplings of Vanishing Noise Cost §strong. Since τ∘(q1,q2)=(q2,q1)\tau\circ(q_{1},q_{2})=(q_{2},q_{1}), (F2) gives γn=τ#γn′=(q2,q1)#σn\gamma_{n}=\tau_{\#}\gamma'_{n}=(q_{2},q_{1})_{\#}\sigma_{n} (as τ∘τ\tau\circ\tau is the identity), and hence

∫X×XΔn dγn=∫X(3)∣(Sn(q2w)−q2w)−(S(q1w)−q1w)∣a2 σn(dw).\int_{X\times X}\Delta_{n}\,d\gamma_{n}=\int_{X_{(3)}}\bigl|(S_{n}(q_{2}w)-q_{2}w)-(S(q_{1}w)-q_{1}w)\bigr|_{a}^{2}\,\sigma_{n}(dw).

For w∈Nnw\in N_{n}, with uu and vv as in Step 8, the vector inside the norm is −(u+v)-(u+v), whose norm is ∣u+v∣a|u+v|_{a} by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §homogeneity in XaX^{a}, so by (F3) and (F4) the integrand is at most 2∣u∣a2+2∣v∣a2=2na(S(q1w)−q3w)+2ca((q1,q2)(w))2|u|_{a}^{2}+2|v|_{a}^{2}=2n_{a}(S(q_{1}w)-q_{3}w)+2c_{a}((q_{1},q_{2})(w)). As σn(Nn)=1\sigma_{n}(N_{n})=1, The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison, Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative and (F2) (with (q1,q2)#σn=γn′(q_{1},q_{2})_{\#}\sigma_{n}=\gamma'_{n}) give

0≤∫X×XΔn dγn≤2∫X(3)na(S(q1w)−q3w) σn(dw)+2Ia(γn′).0\le\int_{X\times X}\Delta_{n}\,d\gamma_{n}\le2\int_{X_{(3)}}n_{a}\bigl(S(q_{1}w)-q_{3}w\bigr)\,\sigma_{n}(dw)+2I^{a}(\gamma'_{n}).

The first term on the right tends to 00 by Step 7 and the second equals 2Ia(γn)→02I^{a}(\gamma_{n})\to0 by Step 6. Hence lim⁡n∫Δn dγn=0\lim_{n}\int\Delta_{n}\,d\gamma_{n}=0, which is, by Strong and Weak Convergence of Noise Fields Along Couplings of Vanishing Noise Cost §strong, the strong convergence of (Sn−id)n∈N(S_{n}-\mathrm{id})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} to S−idS-\mathrm{id} along (γn)n∈N(\gamma_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}}.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…