TheoremBase

The identities for constant classes come from the pointwise operations on representatives, and give the isometry. Law invariance transfers along the push-forward description of the law of a translate, and makes the two translated functions literally equal. The partial derivatives are read off the definition of Fréchet differentiability along constant directions, after a division step, and their continuity follows by composing the continuous gradient map with the Lipschitz pairing against a fixed vector. The trace identity is the definition of the Laplacian read against that of the trace.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is used here for the real Hilbert space E=L2(Ω;Rm)E=L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{m}) of Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (i), which is open in itself, so that Fréchet Differentiability and the Gradient on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space and The Classes C1C^1 and C2C^2 on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space apply to Φ\Phi on it. Throughout, Xa=Z+caX_{a}=Z+c_{a} for a∈Rma\in\mathbb{R}^{m}, so that ϕZ(a)=Φ(Xa)\phi_{Z}(a)=\Phi(X_{a}). The set Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} is open by claim 1 of Euclidean Space Is Open in Itself, so Partial Derivative of a Real-Valued Function on an Open Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n and Functions of Class Cᵏ on an Open Subset of ℝⁿ apply to functions on it; continuity in the sense of Continuity at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces required there is continuity for the Euclidean distance, which by claim 1 of Euclidean Continuity Agrees with Metric Continuity for Real-Valued Functions is the notion used below.

Claim 1. For a,b∈Rma,b\in\mathbb{R}^{m} and t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} one has

ca+cb=ca+b,t ca=cta,c0Rm=0,c_{a}+c_{b}=c_{a+b},\qquad t\,c_{a}=c_{ta},\qquad c_{0_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}}=\mathbf{0},

where 0\mathbf 0 is the zero vector of EE: the pointwise sum of the constant maps with values aa and bb is the constant map with value a+ba+b, and likewise for scalar multiples and for the value 0Rm0_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}, and by The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors (ii) the class of a pointwise sum is the sum of the classes and the class of a scalar multiple is the scalar multiple of the class. In particular Xa+t cei=Xa+teiX_{a}+t\,c_{e_{i}}=X_{a+te_{i}} for i∈[m]i\in[m], where the point a+teia+te_{i} is obtained from aa by replacing its iith component by ai+ta_{i}+t, by Sum of Points of Rn\mathbb{R}^n and Euclidean Space and Real Matrices: Standing Notation (vi), and X0Rm=ZX_{0_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}}=Z. By The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors is a Real Hilbert Space; Its Laws Have Finite Second Moment; Constants and Translations (iii) and Euclidean Space and Real Matrices: Standing Notation (vi),

∥ca∥L2=∥a∥,∥cei∥L2=∥ei∥=1(i∈[m]).\lVert c_{a}\rVert_{L^{2}}=\lVert a\rVert,\qquad\lVert c_{e_{i}}\rVert_{L^{2}}=\lVert e_{i}\rVert=1\qquad(i\in[m]).

Consequently the map J=JZ:Rm→EJ=J_{Z}:\mathbb{R}^{m}\to E, J(a)=XaJ(a)=X_{a}, satisfies dL2(J(a),J(b))=∥ca−cb∥L2=∥ca−b∥L2=∥a−b∥=dE(a,b)d_{L^{2}}(J(a),J(b))=\lVert c_{a}-c_{b}\rVert_{L^{2}}=\lVert c_{a-b}\rVert_{L^{2}}=\lVert a-b\rVert=d_{E}(a,b), the distances being those of The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity (iii) and Euclidean Space and Real Matrices: Standing Notation (i); so JJ is Lipschitz with constant 11 and hence continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous and Continuous. This proves claim 1.

Claim 2. Let a∈Rma\in\mathbb{R}^{m}. By The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors is a Real Hilbert Space; Its Laws Have Finite Second Moment; Constants and Translations (iii), read with mm in place of dd, the laws of Z+caZ+c_{a} and of Z′+caZ'+c_{a} are the push-forwards of L(Z)\mathcal{L}(Z) and of L(Z′)\mathcal{L}(Z') by the translation τa\tau_{a}, hence are equal. Since Φ\Phi is law-invariant, Law-Invariant Function on the Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors (i) gives Φ(Z′+ca)=Φ(Z+ca)\Phi(Z'+c_{a})=\Phi(Z+c_{a}), that is ϕZ′(a)=ϕZ(a)\phi_{Z'}(a)=\phi_{Z}(a). As aa was arbitrary, ϕZ′=ϕZ\phi_{Z'}=\phi_{Z}; being the same function, it is of class CkC^{k} on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} under either name exactly when it is under the other, with the same partial derivatives of every order at every point. This proves claim 2.

Claim 3. We first record a division step. Let A,L,h∈RA,L,h\in\mathbb{R} with h≠0h\ne0 and let ε\varepsilon be positive with ∣A−hL∣≤ε2∣h∣|A-hL|\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}|h|. Since ∣h∣ ∣h−1∣=∣hh−1∣=∣1∣=1|h|\,|h^{-1}|=|hh^{-1}|=|1|=1 by claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, the number ∣h−1∣|h^{-1}| is the multiplicative inverse of ∣h∣|h|, which is nonzero by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field; hence, by claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field applied with the nonnegative multiplier ∣h−1∣|h^{-1}|,

∣Ah−L∣=∣(A−hL)h−1∣=∣A−hL∣ ∣h−1∣≤ε2<ε,\Bigl|\frac{A}{h}-L\Bigr|=\bigl|(A-hL)h^{-1}\bigr|=|A-hL|\,|h^{-1}|\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}<\varepsilon ,

the last inequality by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

Now assume Φ∈C1(E)\Phi\in C^{1}(E) and fix a∈Rma\in\mathbb{R}^{m} and i∈[m]i\in[m], and put L=⟨DΦ(Xa),cei⟩L2L=\langle D\Phi(X_{a}),c_{e_{i}}\rangle_{L^{2}}. Let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. Since Φ\Phi is differentiable at XaX_{a}, Fréchet Differentiability and the Gradient on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space (i) applied with ε2\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}, positive by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, provides a positive δ\delta such that every w∈Ew\in E with ∥w∥L2<δ\lVert w\rVert_{L^{2}}<\delta satisfies

∣Φ(Xa+w)−Φ(Xa)−⟨DΦ(Xa),w⟩L2∣≤ε2∥w∥L2.\bigl|\Phi(X_{a}+w)-\Phi(X_{a})-\langle D\Phi(X_{a}),w\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr|\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}\lVert w\rVert_{L^{2}} .

Let h∈Rh\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0<∣h∣<δ0<|h|<\delta and take w=h ceiw=h\,c_{e_{i}}, so that ∥w∥L2=∣h∣ ∥cei∥L2=∣h∣\lVert w\rVert_{L^{2}}=|h|\,\lVert c_{e_{i}}\rVert_{L^{2}}=|h| by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iv), and Xa+w=Xa+heiX_{a}+w=X_{a+he_{i}} by claim 1. Since ⟨DΦ(Xa),h cei⟩L2=hL\langle D\Phi(X_{a}),h\,c_{e_{i}}\rangle_{L^{2}}=hL by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (i), the display reads

∣ϕZ(a+hei)−ϕZ(a)−hL∣≤ε2∣h∣,\bigl|\phi_{Z}(a+he_{i})-\phi_{Z}(a)-hL\bigr|\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}|h| ,

and the division step gives ∣1h(ϕZ(a+hei)−ϕZ(a))−L∣<ε\bigl|\tfrac{1}{h}(\phi_{Z}(a+he_{i})-\phi_{Z}(a))-L\bigr|<\varepsilon. By Partial Derivative of a Real-Valued Function on an Open Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n this says exactly that ∂iϕZ(a)\partial_{i}\phi_{Z}(a) exists and equals LL, the point a+heia+he_{i} being the one obtained from aa by replacing its iith component by ai+ha_{i}+h.

It remains to see that ϕZ\phi_{Z} is of class C1C^{1} on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m}. For i∈[m]i\in[m] let Ψi:E→R\Psi_{i}:E\to\mathbb{R} be the function Ψi(X)=⟨DΦ(X),cei⟩L2\Psi_{i}(X)=\langle D\Phi(X),c_{e_{i}}\rangle_{L^{2}}, so that ϕZ=Φ∘J\phi_{Z}=\Phi\circ J and ∂iϕZ=Ψi∘J\partial_{i}\phi_{Z}=\Psi_{i}\circ J by the previous paragraph. The function Φ\Phi is continuous on EE by claim 2 of Basic Properties of Differentiability on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space, its gradient map DΦ:E→ED\Phi:E\to E is continuous by The Classes C1C^1 and C2C^2 on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space (i), and the map X↦⟨X,cei⟩L2X\mapsto\langle X,c_{e_{i}}\rangle_{L^{2}} is Lipschitz with constant ∥cei∥L2\lVert c_{e_{i}}\rVert_{L^{2}} by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity (vii), hence continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous and Continuous. Claim 3 of Semicontinuity and Continuity Under Composition with a Continuous Map, applied to the continuous map DΦD\Phi and to the continuous function X↦⟨X,cei⟩L2X\mapsto\langle X,c_{e_{i}}\rangle_{L^{2}}, gives that Ψi\Psi_{i} is continuous on EE; applying that claim again, to the continuous map JJ of claim 1 and to Ψi\Psi_{i}, and once more to JJ and to Φ\Phi, the functions ∂iϕZ=Ψi∘J\partial_{i}\phi_{Z}=\Psi_{i}\circ J, for each i∈[m]i\in[m], and ϕZ=Φ∘J\phi_{Z}=\Phi\circ J are continuous at every point of Rm\mathbb{R}^{m}. Hence ϕZ\phi_{Z} is continuous with continuous partial derivatives of every index, so is of class C1C^{1} on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} by clauses 1 and 3 of Functions of Class Cᵏ on an Open Subset of ℝⁿ. This proves claim 3.

Claim 4. By The Translation Laplacian of a Function on the Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors (i), read with mm in place of dd, the hypothesis says that ϕZ\phi_{Z} is of class C2C^{2} on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m}, so its Hessian matrix D2ϕZ(0Rm)D^{2}\phi_{Z}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}) is defined and lies in S(m)\mathcal{S}(m) by Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation (ii), its entry in row ii and column ll being ∂i∂lϕZ(0Rm)\partial_{i}\partial_{l}\phi_{Z}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}) by The Hessian Matrix of a Function of Class C². By The Translation Laplacian of a Function on the Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors (ii) the translation Laplacian of Φ\Phi at ZZ is ΔtrΦ(Z)=ΔϕZ(0Rm)\Delta_{\mathrm{tr}}\Phi(Z)=\Delta\phi_{Z}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}), which by The Laplacian of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function (i) is the sum of the mm numbers ∂i∂iϕZ(0Rm)\partial_{i}\partial_{i}\phi_{Z}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}), that is of the diagonal entries of D2ϕZ(0Rm)D^{2}\phi_{Z}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}); by Trace of a Real Square Matrix this sum is tr D2ϕZ(0Rm)\mathrm{tr}\,D^{2}\phi_{Z}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}). This proves claim 4.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…