Write c = F ( x 0 , u ( x 0 ) , p , X ) c=F\bigl(x_{0},u(x_{0}),p,X\bigr) c = F ( x 0 β , u ( x 0 β ) , p , X ) .
Claim 1. Suppose, seeking a contradiction, that c β€ 0 c\le 0 c β€ 0 fails. Since the order on R \mathbb{R} R is a total order , this means 0 < c 0<c 0 < c .
Apply the continuity hypothesis with Ξ΅ = c \varepsilon=c Ξ΅ = c : there is Ξ΄ β R \delta\in\mathbb{R} Ξ΄ β R with 0 < Ξ΄ 0<\delta 0 < Ξ΄ such that every y β U y\in U y β U , s β R s\in\mathbb{R} s β R , q β R n q\in\mathbb{R}^{n} q β R n and Y β S ( n ) Y\in\mathcal{S}(n) Y β S ( n ) with
d E ( y , x 0 ) < Ξ΄ , β£ s β u ( x 0 ) β£ < Ξ΄ , β₯ q β p β₯ < Ξ΄ , d S ( n ) ( Y , X ) < Ξ΄ d_{E}(y,x_{0})<\delta,\quad |s-u(x_{0})|<\delta,\quad \lVert q-p\rVert<\delta,\quad d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(Y,X)<\delta d E β ( y , x 0 β ) < Ξ΄ , β£ s β u ( x 0 β ) β£ < Ξ΄ , β₯ q β p β₯ < Ξ΄ , d S ( n ) β ( Y , X ) < Ξ΄
satisfies β£ F ( y , s , q , Y ) β c β£ < c \bigl|F(y,s,q,Y)-c\bigr|<c β F ( y , s , q , Y ) β c β < c .
Apply the approximation hypothesis with Ξ΅ = Ξ΄ \varepsilon=\delta Ξ΅ = Ξ΄ : there are y β U y\in U y β U and Ο : U β R \varphi:U\to\mathbb{R} Ο : U β R of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 on U U U such that u β Ο u-\varphi u β Ο has a local maximum at y y y relative to U U U and
d E ( y , x 0 ) < Ξ΄ , β£ u ( y ) β u ( x 0 ) β£ < Ξ΄ , β₯ D Ο ( y ) β p β₯ < Ξ΄ , d S ( n ) ( D 2 Ο ( y ) , X ) < Ξ΄ . d_{E}(y,x_{0})<\delta,\quad |u(y)-u(x_{0})|<\delta,\quad \lVert D\varphi(y)-p\rVert<\delta,\quad d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}\bigl(D^{2}\varphi(y),X\bigr)<\delta . d E β ( y , x 0 β ) < Ξ΄ , β£ u ( y ) β u ( x 0 β ) β£ < Ξ΄ , β₯ D Ο ( y ) β p β₯ < Ξ΄ , d S ( n ) β ( D 2 Ο ( y ) , X ) < Ξ΄ .
Thus the quadruple ( y , u ( y ) , D Ο ( y ) , D 2 Ο ( y ) ) \bigl(y,u(y),D\varphi(y),D^{2}\varphi(y)\bigr) ( y , u ( y ) , D Ο ( y ) , D 2 Ο ( y ) ) satisfies the four conditions above, with s = u ( y ) s=u(y) s = u ( y ) , q = D Ο ( y ) q=D\varphi(y) q = D Ο ( y ) and Y = D 2 Ο ( y ) Y=D^{2}\varphi(y) Y = D 2 Ο ( y ) ; recall that Y Y Y lies in S ( n ) \mathcal{S}(n) S ( n ) by claim 2 of Equality of Mixed Second Partial Derivatives and Symmetry of the Hessian . Writing
a = F ( y , u ( y ) , D Ο ( y ) , D 2 Ο ( y ) ) , a=F\bigl(y,u(y),D\varphi(y),D^{2}\varphi(y)\bigr), a = F ( y , u ( y ) , D Ο ( y ) , D 2 Ο ( y ) ) ,
we therefore have β£ a β c β£ < c |a-c|<c β£ a β c β£ < c , and claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives β c < a β c -c<a-c β c < a β c , whence 0 < a 0<a 0 < a by claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field .
On the other hand u u u is a viscosity subsolution of F F F on U U U , and Ο \varphi Ο is of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 on U U U with u β Ο u-\varphi u β Ο having a local maximum at y β U y\in U y β U relative to U U U , so Viscosity Subsolution and Supersolution of a Second-Order Equation gives a β€ 0 a\le 0 a β€ 0 . Together with 0 < a 0<a 0 < a this yields 0 < 0 0<0 0 < 0 by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , which is false. Hence c β€ 0 c\le 0 c β€ 0 , which is claim 1.
Claim 2. Suppose, seeking a contradiction, that 0 β€ c 0\le c 0 β€ c fails; by totality of the order, c < 0 c<0 c < 0 , and by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field the element β c -c β c satisfies 0 < β c 0<-c 0 < β c .
Apply the continuity hypothesis with Ξ΅ = β c \varepsilon=-c Ξ΅ = β c , obtaining Ξ΄ β R \delta\in\mathbb{R} Ξ΄ β R with 0 < Ξ΄ 0<\delta 0 < Ξ΄ as above, and then the approximation hypothesis with Ξ΅ = Ξ΄ \varepsilon=\delta Ξ΅ = Ξ΄ , obtaining y β U y\in U y β U and Ο : U β R \varphi:U\to\mathbb{R} Ο : U β R of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 on U U U such that u β Ο u-\varphi u β Ο has a local minimum at y y y relative to U U U and the four displayed conditions hold. With
a = F ( y , u ( y ) , D Ο ( y ) , D 2 Ο ( y ) ) a=F\bigl(y,u(y),D\varphi(y),D^{2}\varphi(y)\bigr) a = F ( y , u ( y ) , D Ο ( y ) , D 2 Ο ( y ) )
we get β£ a β c β£ < β c |a-c|<-c β£ a β c β£ < β c , and claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives a β c < β c a-c<-c a β c < β c , whence a < 0 a<0 a < 0 by claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field .
On the other hand u u u is a viscosity supersolution of F F F on U U U and u β Ο u-\varphi u β Ο has a local minimum at y y y relative to U U U , so Viscosity Subsolution and Supersolution of a Second-Order Equation gives 0 β€ a 0\le a 0 β€ a . Together with a < 0 a<0 a < 0 this yields 0 < 0 0<0 0 < 0 by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , which is false. Hence 0 β€ c 0\le c 0 β€ c , which is claim 2.