Proof of Viscosity Inequalities Pass to Limits of Test-Function Data
lemmalem:viscosity-inequality-limit-test-data-2026aWrite .
Claim 1. Suppose, seeking a contradiction, that fails. Since the order on is a total order, this means .
Apply the continuity hypothesis with : there is with such that every , , and with
satisfies .
Apply the approximation hypothesis with : there are and of class on such that has a local maximum at relative to and
Thus the quadruple satisfies the four conditions above, with , and ; recall that lies in by claim 2 of Equality of Mixed Second Partial Derivatives and Symmetry of the Hessian. Writing
we therefore have , and claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives , whence by claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.
On the other hand is a viscosity subsolution of on , and is of class on with having a local maximum at relative to , so Viscosity Subsolution and Supersolution of a Second-Order Equation gives . Together with this yields by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, which is false. Hence , which is claim 1.
Claim 2. Suppose, seeking a contradiction, that fails; by totality of the order, , and by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field the element satisfies .
Apply the continuity hypothesis with , obtaining with as above, and then the approximation hypothesis with , obtaining and of class on such that has a local minimum at relative to and the four displayed conditions hold. With
we get , and claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives , whence by claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.
On the other hand is a viscosity supersolution of on and has a local minimum at relative to , so Viscosity Subsolution and Supersolution of a Second-Order Equation gives . Together with this yields by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, which is false. Hence , which is claim 2.
Loadingβ¦
Prerequisites
51809e03-f61e-4206-9d4e-8294ccfd82f3