TheoremBase

Lipschitz functions are continuous, hence Borel. For the criterion, a bounded Borel function is approximated in L1L^1 of nu+gamma by clipped Lipschitz combinations of Lipschitz approximations of indicators, which perturbs the functional by an arbitrarily small amount, and the measurable criterion then applies; closedness follows by passing to the weak limit in the Gibbs inequality for each bounded Lipschitz test function.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, ν\nu and γ\gamma are probability measures on the measurable space (S,B(S))(S,\mathcal{B}(S)), by Borel Measure on a Metric Space, and dRd_{\mathbb{R}} is the absolute-value metric; for a nonnegative integrable function the integral of Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral is its integral as a nonnegative measurable function, its negative part being 00.

Claim 1. Let h:S→Rh:S\to\mathbb{R} be bounded Lipschitz. By A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous, hh is continuous from (S,d)(S,d) to (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), so by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space it is measurable with respect to B(S)\mathcal{B}(S) and the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), which is the Borel σ\sigma-algebra B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) of the real line by claim 2 of that lemma. Thus hh is measurable in the sense of Measurable Function and Real-Valued Measurable Function, and being bounded it is bounded measurable.

Claim 2. By Relative Entropy on a Measurable Space: the Gibbs Inequality, the Variational Criterion and Formula, the Entropy Inequality, Small Sets and Data Processing §criterion, applied to (S,B(S))(S,\mathcal{B}(S)), ν\nu, γ\gamma and CC, it suffices to show Λhγ(ν)≤C\Lambda^{\gamma}_{h}(\nu)\le C for every bounded measurable h:S→Rh:S\to\mathbb{R}. Fix such hh and a bound MM for it. By Nonnegative Combinations of Two Finite Measures, and the Average of Two Couplings §combination with α=ν\alpha=\nu, β=γ\beta=\gamma and s=t=1s=t=1, the set function μ=ν+γ\mu=\nu+\gamma is a measure on (S,B(S))(S,\mathcal{B}(S)), hence a Borel measure on (S,d)(S,d), with μ(S)=2\mu(S)=2, and

(‡)∫Su dμ=∫Su dν+∫Su dγfor every measurable u:S→[0,∞].(\ddagger)\qquad\int_{S}u\,d\mu=\int_{S}u\,d\nu+\int_{S}u\,d\gamma\quad\text{for every measurable }u:S\to[0,\infty].

Let ε\varepsilon be a positive real; the parameters are chosen in the order ε\varepsilon, then δ\delta and σ\sigma, then η\eta, then the functions ℓi\ell_{i} and sets NiN_{i}. Let δ=ε/4\delta=\varepsilon/4. The function g=h+Mg=h+M is measurable by claims 1 and 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions and satisfies 0≤g≤2M0\le g\le2M, so Approximation of Measurable Functions by Simple Functions §bounded, for the measure space (S,B(S),μ)(S,\mathcal{B}(S),\mu) and K=2MK=2M, gives (choosing an index mm with 2−m≤δ2^{-m}\le\delta) a nonnegative simple function σ\sigma with 0≤g−σ≤δ0\le g-\sigma\le\delta on SS. Let σ=∑i=1rci1Bi\sigma=\sum_{i=1}^{r}c_{i}\mathbf{1}_{B_{i}} be its standard representation of Simple Function and Its Integral, with r≥1r\ge1 (as SS is nonempty), ci≥0c_{i}\ge0 and Bi∈B(S)B_{i}\in\mathcal{B}(S). Let η=ε/(4(M+1)r)\eta=\varepsilon/(4(M+1)r). For each ii, Inner and Outer Regularity of a Finite Borel Measure on a Metric Space, and Lipschitz Approximation of Indicators §lipschitz, applied to μ\mu, BiB_{i} and η\eta, gives a map ℓi:S→R\ell_{i}:S\to\mathbb{R}, Lipschitz with some constant LiL_{i}, with 0≤ℓi≤10\le\ell_{i}\le1, and a set Ni∈B(S)N_{i}\in\mathcal{B}(S) with μ(Ni)≤η\mu(N_{i})\le\eta and ℓi=1Bi\ell_{i}=\mathbf{1}_{B_{i}} on S∖NiS\setminus N_{i}. Let p=−M+∑i=1rciℓip=-M+\sum_{i=1}^{r}c_{i}\ell_{i} and k=max⁡(−M,min⁡(M,p))k=\max(-M,\min(M,p)). By the triangle inequality ∣p(x)−p(x′)∣≤(∑iciLi) d(x,x′)|p(x)-p(x')|\le(\sum_{i}c_{i}L_{i})\,d(x,x') for x,x′∈Sx,x'\in S, and the map v↦max⁡(−M,min⁡(M,v))v\mapsto\max(-M,\min(M,v)) satisfies ∣max⁡(−M,min⁡(M,v))−max⁡(−M,min⁡(M,w))∣≤∣v−w∣|\max(-M,\min(M,v))-\max(-M,\min(M,w))|\le|v-w| for real v,wv,w; hence kk is Lipschitz with constant ∑iciLi\sum_{i}c_{i}L_{i} for dd and dRd_{\mathbb{R}} by Lipschitz Map Between Metric Spaces, and ∣k∣≤M|k|\le M, so kk is bounded Lipschitz and Λkγ(ν)≤C\Lambda^{\gamma}_{k}(\nu)\le C by hypothesis. Let N=⋃i=1rNi∈B(S)N=\bigcup_{i=1}^{r}N_{i}\in\mathcal{B}(S); by Basic Properties of a Measure §subadditivity (extended by empty sets) μ(N)≤rη≤ε/(4(M+1))\mu(N)\le r\eta\le\varepsilon/(4(M+1)). For x∈S∖Nx\in S\setminus N, p(x)=−M+σ(x)p(x)=-M+\sigma(x), so ∣p(x)−h(x)∣=∣σ(x)−g(x)∣≤δ|p(x)-h(x)|=|\sigma(x)-g(x)|\le\delta, and since −M≤h(x)≤M-M\le h(x)\le M gives h(x)=max⁡(−M,min⁡(M,h(x)))h(x)=\max(-M,\min(M,h(x))), also ∣k(x)−h(x)∣≤∣p(x)−h(x)∣≤δ|k(x)-h(x)|\le|p(x)-h(x)|\le\delta; for x∈Nx\in N, ∣k(x)−h(x)∣≤2M|k(x)-h(x)|\le2M. Thus ∣k−h∣≤δ1S+2M1N|k-h|\le\delta\mathbf{1}_{S}+2M\mathbf{1}_{N} pointwise, where ∣k−h∣|k-h| is measurable by Claim 1 and claims 2 and 4 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative with The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set gives

∫S∣k−h∣ dμ≤2δ+2Mμ(N)≤ε2+ε2=ε,\int_{S}|k-h|\,d\mu\le2\delta+2M\mu(N)\le\frac{\varepsilon}{2}+\frac{\varepsilon}{2}=\varepsilon ,

so by (‡)(\ddagger) both ∫S∣k−h∣ dν≤ε\int_{S}|k-h|\,d\nu\le\varepsilon and ∫S∣k−h∣ dγ≤ε\int_{S}|k-h|\,d\gamma\le\varepsilon. By Relative Entropy on a Measurable Space: the Gibbs Inequality, the Variational Criterion and Formula, the Entropy Inequality, Small Sets and Data Processing §functional, hh and kk are ν\nu-integrable and exp⁡∘h\exp\circ h, exp⁡∘k\exp\circ k are γ\gamma-integrable, and the nonnegative measurable function ∣k−h∣|k-h|, having finite integral with respect to ν\nu and to γ\gamma, is ν\nu-integrable and γ\gamma-integrable by Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral. Since h−k≤∣k−h∣h-k\le|k-h| pointwise, the linearity and monotonicity of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable give ∫Sh dν−∫Sk dν=∫S(h−k) dν≤∫S∣k−h∣ dν≤ε\int_{S}h\,d\nu-\int_{S}k\,d\nu=\int_{S}(h-k)\,d\nu\le\int_{S}|k-h|\,d\nu\le\varepsilon, that is ∫Sh dν≤∫Sk dν+ε\int_{S}h\,d\nu\le\int_{S}k\,d\nu+\varepsilon. For reals a≥ba\ge b in [−M,M][-M,M], The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §exp gives exp⁡(b−a)≥1+b−a\exp(b-a)\ge1+b-a, so by claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function exp⁡(a)−exp⁡(b)=exp⁡(a)(1−exp⁡(b−a))≤exp⁡(M)(a−b)\exp(a)-\exp(b)=\exp(a)(1-\exp(b-a))\le\exp(M)(a-b); hence ∣exp⁡∘k−exp⁡∘h∣≤exp⁡(M)∣k−h∣|\exp\circ k-\exp\circ h|\le\exp(M)|k-h| pointwise. Writing Z=∫Sexp⁡∘h dγZ=\int_{S}\exp\circ h\,d\gamma and Zk=∫Sexp⁡∘k dγZ_{k}=\int_{S}\exp\circ k\,d\gamma, the linearity and monotonicity of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable, applied to the γ\gamma-integrable functions exp⁡∘k\exp\circ k, exp⁡∘h\exp\circ h and ∣k−h∣|k-h| and to the pointwise inequality exp⁡∘k−exp⁡∘h≤exp⁡(M)∣k−h∣\exp\circ k-\exp\circ h\le\exp(M)|k-h|, give

Zk−Z=∫S(exp⁡∘k−exp⁡∘h) dγ≤exp⁡(M)∫S∣k−h∣ dγ≤exp⁡(M)ε,Z_{k}-Z=\int_{S}(\exp\circ k-\exp\circ h)\,d\gamma\le\exp(M)\int_{S}|k-h|\,d\gamma\le\exp(M)\varepsilon ,

and Z≥exp⁡(−M)γ(S)=exp⁡(−M)Z\ge\exp(-M)\gamma(S)=\exp(-M) because exp⁡∘h≥exp⁡(−M)\exp\circ h\ge\exp(-M) (exp⁡\exp being increasing by claim 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function). By The Natural Logarithm and the inequality log⁡x≤x−1\log x\le x-1 of The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §log,

log⁡Zk−log⁡Z=log⁡ZkZ≤Zk−ZZ≤exp⁡(2M)ε.\log Z_{k}-\log Z=\log\frac{Z_{k}}{Z}\le\frac{Z_{k}-Z}{Z}\le\exp(2M)\varepsilon .

Therefore Λhγ(ν)=∫Sh dν−log⁡Z≤∫Sk dν+ε−log⁡Zk+exp⁡(2M)ε=Λkγ(ν)+(1+exp⁡(2M))ε≤C+(1+exp⁡(2M))ε\Lambda^{\gamma}_{h}(\nu)=\int_{S}h\,d\nu-\log Z\le\int_{S}k\,d\nu+\varepsilon-\log Z_{k}+\exp(2M)\varepsilon=\Lambda^{\gamma}_{k}(\nu)+(1+\exp(2M))\varepsilon\le C+(1+\exp(2M))\varepsilon. As ε\varepsilon was an arbitrary positive real, Λhγ(ν)≤C\Lambda^{\gamma}_{h}(\nu)\le C.

Claim 3. Let h:S→Rh:S\to\mathbb{R} be bounded Lipschitz; it is bounded measurable by Claim 1 and continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous. Let Z=∫Sexp⁡∘h dγZ=\int_{S}\exp\circ h\,d\gamma, a positive real by Relative Entropy on a Measurable Space: the Gibbs Inequality, the Variational Criterion and Formula, the Entropy Inequality, Small Sets and Data Processing §functional. For each jj, Relative Entropy on a Measurable Space: the Gibbs Inequality, the Variational Criterion and Formula, the Entropy Inequality, Small Sets and Data Processing §gibbs, applied to (S,B(S))(S,\mathcal{B}(S)), νj\nu_{j} and γ\gamma, gives

∫Sh dνj−log⁡Z=Λhγ(νj)≤H(νj ∣ γ)≤C.\int_{S}h\,d\nu_{j}-\log Z=\Lambda^{\gamma}_{h}(\nu_{j})\le H(\nu_{j}\,|\,\gamma)\le C .

Since νj⇒ν\nu_{j}\Rightarrow\nu and hh is bounded and continuous, ∫Sh dνj→∫Sh dν\int_{S}h\,d\nu_{j}\to\int_{S}h\,d\nu by Weak Convergence of Finite Borel Measures on a Metric Space, so passing to the limit gives Λhγ(ν)=∫Sh dν−log⁡Z≤C\Lambda^{\gamma}_{h}(\nu)=\int_{S}h\,d\nu-\log Z\le C. This holds for every bounded Lipschitz hh, so Claim 2 shows that ν\nu has finite relative entropy with respect to γ\gamma and H(ν ∣ γ)≤CH(\nu\,|\,\gamma)\le C.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…