TheoremBase

Proof of Cauchy Sequences for a Positive Semidefinite Symmetric Bilinear Form: Cauchy-Schwarz, the Space of Cauchy Sequences, Convergence of Pairings, and Null Sequences

lemmalem:semi-inner-product-cauchy-sequences-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 10,097 chars · 20 deps · depth 13 Reason: Proof of the semi-inner-product Cauchy sequence lemma (Goal 4, T2).

Cauchy-Schwarz comes from the nonnegative quadratic t -> beta(u+tv,u+tv), and the statements about Cauchy sequences follow from the seminorm inequalities, eventual boundedness of Cauchy sequences and the completeness and limit laws of the real numbers.

Proof

This proof uses: the definitions Vector Space over a Field, Linear Map and Linear Subspace, and claims 1, 2 and 5 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space; for real numbers, Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root and claims 3(c) and 3(e) of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities; for limits, Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers, Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences, Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences, Constant Sequences and Index-Shifted Sequences of Real Numbers §constant, claim 1 of Uniqueness of Limits and Boundedness of Convergent Real Sequences, Cauchy Sequence of Real Numbers and Every Cauchy Sequence of Real Numbers Converges; and, for indices, claims 1 to 3 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers (the order of N\mathbb{N} is total) with claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements. Rearrangements of sums, differences and multiples of vectors below are consequences of conditions 1 to 8 of Vector Space over a Field and claims 1, 2 and 5 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space; in particular u−v=u+(−1)vu-v=u+(-1)v and v−u=(−1)(u−v)v-u=(-1)(u-v). Write ∥⋅∥\|\cdot\| for ∥⋅∥β\|\cdot\|_{\beta}; thus 0≤∥v∥0\le\|v\| and ∥v∥2=β(v,v)\|v\|^{2}=\beta(v,v) by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root.

Step 0 (bilinearity in both arguments). By symmetry, u↦β(u,v)u\mapsto\beta(u,v) is also linear for each vv. Hence for u,v∈Vu,v\in V and t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R},

β(u+tv,u+tv)=β(u,u)+2t β(u,v)+t2β(v,v).(1)\beta(u+tv,u+tv)=\beta(u,u)+2t\,\beta(u,v)+t^{2}\beta(v,v).\tag{1}

Also β(0,v)=β(0⋅0,v)=0\beta(0,v)=\beta(0\cdot0,v)=0 by claim 3 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space, so ∥0∥=0\|0\|=0 (the square root of 00 is 00, by uniqueness in Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root).

Step 1 (claim 1, Cauchy-Schwarz). Let u,v∈Vu,v\in V and b=β(u,v)b=\beta(u,v). By claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, ∣b∣|b| is bb or −b-b, so ∣b∣2=b2|b|^{2}=b^{2} by claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field. Case β(v,v)=0\beta(v,v)=0: then (1) and positive semidefiniteness give 0≤β(u,u)+2tb0\le\beta(u,u)+2tb for every real tt. If b≠0b\ne0, then 2b≠02b\ne0 (as 0<20<2 by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and claim 3 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field), and t=−(β(u,u)+1)/(2b)t=-(\beta(u,u)+1)/(2b) gives β(u,u)+2tb=−1<0\beta(u,u)+2tb=-1<0 (claims 6 and 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), a contradiction; so b=0b=0 and ∣b∣=0=∥u∥⋅∥v∥|b|=0=\|u\|\cdot\|v\| since ∥v∥=0\|v\|=0. Case β(v,v)≠0\beta(v,v)\ne0: then 0<β(v,v)0<\beta(v,v), and t=−b/β(v,v)t=-b/\beta(v,v) in (1) gives 0≤β(u,u)−b2/β(v,v)0\le\beta(u,u)-b^{2}/\beta(v,v); multiplying by β(v,v)\beta(v,v) (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) and translating (claim 3 there), ∣b∣2=b2≤β(u,u)β(v,v)=(∥u∥∥v∥)2|b|^{2}=b^{2}\le\beta(u,u)\beta(v,v)=(\|u\|\|v\|)^{2}. Since 0≤∣b∣0\le|b| and 0≤∥u∥∥v∥0\le\|u\|\|v\| (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives ∣b∣≤∥u∥∥v∥|b|\le\|u\|\|v\|.

Step 2 (claim 1, the seminorm). Triangle: by (1) with t=1t=1, b≤∣b∣b\le|b| (claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field), Step 1 and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

∥u+v∥2=∥u∥2+2β(u,v)+∥v∥2≤∥u∥2+2∥u∥∥v∥+∥v∥2=(∥u∥+∥v∥)2,\|u+v\|^{2}=\|u\|^{2}+2\beta(u,v)+\|v\|^{2}\le\|u\|^{2}+2\|u\|\|v\|+\|v\|^{2}=(\|u\|+\|v\|)^{2},

and both ∥u+v∥\|u+v\| and ∥u∥+∥v∥\|u\|+\|v\| are nonnegative (claim 2 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), so ∥u+v∥≤∥u∥+∥v∥\|u+v\|\le\|u\|+\|v\| by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. Homogeneity: ∥cu∥2=β(cu,cu)=c2β(u,u)=(∣c∣ ∥u∥)2\|cu\|^{2}=\beta(cu,cu)=c^{2}\beta(u,u)=(|c|\,\|u\|)^{2}, using ∣c∣2=c2|c|^{2}=c^{2} as in Step 1; both sides being nonnegative, ∥cu∥=∣c∣ ∥u∥\|cu\|=|c|\,\|u\| by claim 3 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. Reverse triangle: ∥u∥=∥(u−v)+v∥≤∥u−v∥+∥v∥\|u\|=\|(u-v)+v\|\le\|u-v\|+\|v\| gives ∥u∥−∥v∥≤∥u−v∥\|u\|-\|v\|\le\|u-v\|, and likewise ∥v∥−∥u∥≤∥v−u∥=∥(−1)(u−v)∥=∥u−v∥\|v\|-\|u\|\le\|v-u\|=\|(-1)(u-v)\|=\|u-v\|; so −∥u−v∥≤∥u∥−∥v∥≤∥u−v∥-\|u-v\|\le\|u\|-\|v\|\le\|u-v\| (claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), which is the reverse triangle inequality by claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field.

Step 3 (claim 2). A constant sequence (v)(v) satisfies ∥v−v∥=∥0∥=0<ε\|v-v\|=\|0\|=0<\varepsilon for all indices. Let (uk),(vk)∈Cβ(u_{k}),(v_{k})\in C_{\beta}, c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R} and ε>0\varepsilon>0. Choose N1,N2N_{1},N_{2} for ε/2\varepsilon/2 (which is positive, claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) for (uk)(u_{k}) and (vk)(v_{k}), and let N=max⁡{N1,N2}N=\max\{N_{1},N_{2}\}; for k,l≥Nk,l\ge N we have k,l≥N1,N2k,l\ge N_{1},N_{2} (claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements, claim 1 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers), and by Step 2 and claims 3 and 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

∥(uk+vk)−(ul+vl)∥≤∥uk−ul∥+∥vk−vl∥<ε/2+ε/2=ε.\|(u_{k}+v_{k})-(u_{l}+v_{l})\|\le\|u_{k}-u_{l}\|+\|v_{k}-v_{l}\|<\varepsilon/2+\varepsilon/2=\varepsilon .

For multiples, ∥cuk−cul∥=∣c∣ ∥uk−ul∥\|cu_{k}-cu_{l}\|=|c|\,\|u_{k}-u_{l}\| by Step 2; if c=0c=0 this is 0<ε0<\varepsilon, and otherwise 0<∣c∣0<|c| (claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field) and choosing NN for ε/∣c∣\varepsilon/|c| (positive by claims 5 and 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives ∣c∣ ∥uk−ul∥<ε|c|\,\|u_{k}-u_{l}\|<\varepsilon for k,l≥Nk,l\ge N by claim 10 there. So CβC_{\beta} is closed under termwise sums and multiples. Conditions 1, 2 and 5 to 8 of Vector Space over a Field hold in CβC_{\beta} because they hold in VV at every index; the constant sequence 00 lies in CβC_{\beta} and satisfies condition 3, and for (uk)∈Cβ(u_{k})\in C_{\beta} the sequence ((−1)uk)∈Cβ((-1)u_{k})\in C_{\beta} satisfies condition 4, since uk+(−1)uk=0u_{k}+(-1)u_{k}=0 for every kk (claim 5 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space). So CβC_{\beta} is a real vector space with zero vector the constant sequence 00.

Step 4 (eventual bounds). Let u=(uk)∈Cβu=(u_{k})\in C_{\beta}. Choosing NuN_{u} for ε=1\varepsilon=1 and putting Mu=∥uNu∥+1M_{u}=\|u_{N_{u}}\|+1, Step 2 gives ∥uk∥≤∥uk−uNu∥+∥uNu∥≤Mu\|u_{k}\|\le\|u_{k}-u_{N_{u}}\|+\|u_{N_{u}}\|\le M_{u} for every k≥Nuk\ge N_{u}, and 0<Mu0<M_{u}.

Step 5 (claim 3). Let u,v∈Cβu,v\in C_{\beta}, ε>0\varepsilon>0, and M=Mu+MvM=M_{u}+M_{v}, which is positive. By bilinearity and symmetry, β(uk,vk)−β(ul,vl)=β(uk−ul,vk)+β(ul,vk−vl)\beta(u_{k},v_{k})-\beta(u_{l},v_{l})=\beta(u_{k}-u_{l},v_{k})+\beta(u_{l},v_{k}-v_{l}), so by claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, Step 1 and Step 4, for k,l≥max⁡{Nu,Nv}k,l\ge\max\{N_{u},N_{v}\},

∣β(uk,vk)−β(ul,vl)∣≤∥uk−ul∥ M+M ∥vk−vl∥.|\beta(u_{k},v_{k})-\beta(u_{l},v_{l})|\le\|u_{k}-u_{l}\|\,M+M\,\|v_{k}-v_{l}\|.

Let δ=ε/(2M)>0\delta=\varepsilon/(2M)>0 and choose N′N' with ∥uk−ul∥<δ\|u_{k}-u_{l}\|<\delta and ∥vk−vl∥<δ\|v_{k}-v_{l}\|<\delta for k,l≥N′k,l\ge N' (maximum of two indices as in Step 3). For k,l≥max⁡{Nu,Nv,N′}k,l\ge\max\{N_{u},N_{v},N'\} the right side is <δM+δM=ε<\delta M+\delta M=\varepsilon (claims 3 and 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). So (β(uk,vk))k(\beta(u_{k},v_{k}))_{k} is a Cauchy sequence (Cauchy Sequence of Real Numbers) and converges by Every Cauchy Sequence of Real Numbers Converges; its limit β^(u,v)\widehat\beta(u,v) is unique by claim 1 of Uniqueness of Limits and Boundedness of Convergent Real Sequences. Symmetry: (β(uk,vk))(\beta(u_{k},v_{k})) and (β(vk,uk))(\beta(v_{k},u_{k})) are the same sequence. Bilinearity: for w∈Cβw\in C_{\beta} and c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R}, β(uk,vk+wk)=β(uk,vk)+β(uk,wk)\beta(u_{k},v_{k}+w_{k})=\beta(u_{k},v_{k})+\beta(u_{k},w_{k}) and β(uk,cvk)=c β(uk,vk)\beta(u_{k},cv_{k})=c\,\beta(u_{k},v_{k}), so by claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences and uniqueness of limits, β^(u,v+w)=β^(u,v)+β^(u,w)\widehat\beta(u,v+w)=\widehat\beta(u,v)+\widehat\beta(u,w) and β^(u,cv)=c β^(u,v)\widehat\beta(u,cv)=c\,\widehat\beta(u,v). Positive semidefiniteness: 0≤β(uk,uk)0\le\beta(u_{k},u_{k}) for every kk, the constant sequence 00 converges to 00 (Constant Sequences and Index-Shifted Sequences of Real Numbers §constant), so 0≤β^(u,u)0\le\widehat\beta(u,u) by claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences. If u,vu,v are constant, (β(uk,vk))(\beta(u_{k},v_{k})) is the constant sequence β(u1,v1)\beta(u_{1},v_{1}), whose limit is β(u1,v1)\beta(u_{1},v_{1}) by Constant Sequences and Index-Shifted Sequences of Real Numbers §constant.

Step 6 (claim 4). Subspace: the constant sequence 00 has ∥0∥=0\|0\|=0, so it lies in NβN_{\beta}. For u,z∈Nβu,z\in N_{\beta} and c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R}: 0≤∥uk+zk∥≤∥uk∥+∥zk∥0\le\|u_{k}+z_{k}\|\le\|u_{k}\|+\|z_{k}\|, where the right side tends to 00 by claim 1 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences, so ∥uk+zk∥→0\|u_{k}+z_{k}\|\to0 by claim 2 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences; and ∥cuk∥=∣c∣ ∥uk∥→0\|cu_{k}\|=|c|\,\|u_{k}\|\to0 by claim 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences. With Step 3 this shows NβN_{\beta} is a linear subspace of CβC_{\beta} (Linear Subspace). Characterisation: β(uk,uk)=∥uk∥2\beta(u_{k},u_{k})=\|u_{k}\|^{2}. If ∥uk∥→0\|u_{k}\|\to0 then ∥uk∥2→0\|u_{k}\|^{2}\to0 by claim 2 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences, so β^(u,u)=0\widehat\beta(u,u)=0. Conversely, if β(uk,uk)→0\beta(u_{k},u_{k})\to0, then, the terms being nonnegative, claim 3(e) of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities gives ∥uk∥=β(uk,uk)→0=0\|u_{k}\|=\sqrt{\beta(u_{k},u_{k})}\to\sqrt{0}=0, so u∈Nβu\in N_{\beta}. Orthogonality: let u∈Cβu\in C_{\beta}, z∈Nβz\in N_{\beta}. For k≥Nuk\ge N_{u}, Steps 1 and 4 and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field give ∣β(uk,zk)−0∣≤∥uk∥ ∥zk∥≤Mu∥zk∥|\beta(u_{k},z_{k})-0|\le\|u_{k}\|\,\|z_{k}\|\le M_{u}\|z_{k}\|, and Mu∥zk∥→0M_{u}\|z_{k}\|\to0 by claim 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences; by claim 3(c) of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities, β(uk,zk)→0\beta(u_{k},z_{k})\to0, so β^(u,z)=0\widehat\beta(u,z)=0 by uniqueness of limits.

Step 7 (claim 5). Let u,v∈Cβu,v\in C_{\beta}. If [u]=[v][u]=[v], then u=u+0∈[u]=[v]u=u+0\in[u]=[v] (as 0∈Nβ0\in N_{\beta}), so u=v+zu=v+z with z∈Nβz\in N_{\beta} and u−v=z∈Nβu-v=z\in N_{\beta}. Conversely let z0=u−v∈Nβz_{0}=u-v\in N_{\beta}. For z∈Nβz\in N_{\beta}, u+z=v+(z0+z)u+z=v+(z_{0}+z) and v+z=u+(z−z0)v+z=u+(z-z_{0}), where z0+zz_{0}+z and z−z0=z+(−1)z0z-z_{0}=z+(-1)z_{0} lie in NβN_{\beta} by Step 6; hence [u]⊆[v][u]\subseteq[v] and [v]⊆[u][v]\subseteq[u], so [u]=[v][u]=[v]. Now let [u]=[u′][u]=[u'] and [v]=[v′][v]=[v'], so u−u′,v−v′∈Nβu-u',v-v'\in N_{\beta}. Then (u+v)−(u′+v′)=(u−u′)+(v−v′)∈Nβ(u+v)-(u'+v')=(u-u')+(v-v')\in N_{\beta} and cu−cu′=c(u−u′)∈Nβcu-cu'=c(u-u')\in N_{\beta}, which gives [u+v]=[u′+v′][u+v]=[u'+v'] and [cu]=[cu′][cu]=[cu'] by the equivalence just proved. Finally, by bilinearity and symmetry of β^\widehat\beta (Step 5) and the orthogonality in Step 6,

β^(u,v)−β^(u′,v′)=β^(v,u−u′)+β^(u′,v−v′)=0+0=0.\widehat\beta(u,v)-\widehat\beta(u',v')=\widehat\beta(v,u-u')+\widehat\beta(u',v-v')=0+0=0 .
Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…