TheoremBase

Proof of Square-Integrability, Moments, and Covariance Matrix of a Gaussian Random Vector

lemmalem:gaussian-moments-2026b
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Cascade of the def:gaussian-random-vector-2026b correction: proof rebased onto lem:gaussian-moments-2026b with references bumped and the m=0 case noted; argument unchanged.

Proof

Throughout, write Wi=μi+j=1maijZjW_i=\mu_i+\sum_{j=1}^{m}a_{ij}Z_j and Di=XiWiD_i=X_i-W_i; both are random variables by the closure of random variables under sums and scalar multiples recorded in the preliminaries of Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product, and P(Di=0)=1P(D_i=0)=1 by the definition of a Gaussian representation. When m=0m=0, every sum over jj below is empty and equal to 00, in accordance with Gaussian Random Vectors and Jointly Gaussian Random Variables, and every assertion about the individual ZjZ_j holds vacuously; in that case Wi=μiW_i=\mu_i is a constant random variable. All norms and inner products are those of Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product.

Claim 1. Each ZjZ_j is square-integrable, since E[Zj2]=1\mathbb{E}[Z_j^{2}]=1 by Claim 1 of Moments and Stability of the Standard Normal Distribution; hence each WiW_i is square-integrable by the closure properties of Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product (constants being square-integrable). Next, Di2D_i^{2} is a nonnegative random variable that vanishes off the event Ni={XiWi}N_i=\{X_i\ne W_i\}, which satisfies P(Ni)=0P(N_i)=0. If ss is a simple function with 0sDi20\le s\le D_i^{2} pointwise, then ss vanishes wherever Di2D_i^{2} does, so every set on which ss takes a nonzero value is a subset of NiN_i and has probability 00 by the monotonicity of the measure PP; hence the integral of ss is 00. Taking the supremum over such ss in Lebesgue Integral of a Nonnegative Measurable Function gives E[Di2]=0\mathbb{E}[D_i^{2}]=0. Thus DiD_i is square-integrable with Di2=0\lVert D_i\rVert_{2}=0, and Xi=Wi+DiX_i=W_i+D_i is square-integrable by closure. Moreover, for every square-integrable YY, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives E[DiY]Di2Y2=0|\mathbb{E}[D_iY]|\le\lVert D_i\rVert_{2}\lVert Y\rVert_{2}=0, so by the linearity of expectation from Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral,

E[XiY]=E[WiY]for every square-integrable Y.()\mathbb{E}[X_iY]=\mathbb{E}[W_iY]\qquad\text{for every square-integrable }Y. \tag{$*$}

Claim 2. Taking YY the constant random variable 11 in the identity of Claim 1 and using linearity of expectation together with E[Zj]=0\mathbb{E}[Z_j]=0 (Claim 1 of Moments and Stability of the Standard Normal Distribution),

E[Xi]=E[Wi]=μi+j=1maijE[Zj]=μi.\mathbb{E}[X_i]=\mathbb{E}[W_i]=\mu_i+\sum_{j=1}^{m}a_{ij}\,\mathbb{E}[Z_j]=\mu_i .

For the covariance, note Xiμi=jaijZj+DiX_i-\mu_i=\sum_{j}a_{ij}Z_j+D_i, and the terms involving DiD_i or DkD_k contribute 00 to every expectation of a product against a square-integrable factor, by the Cauchy-Schwarz bound of Claim 1. Expanding with the bilinearity of the mean-square inner product from Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product,

Cov(Xi,Xk)=E[(j=1maijZj)(l=1maklZl)]=j=1ml=1maijaklE[ZjZl].\operatorname{Cov}(X_i,X_k)=\mathbb{E}\Bigl[\Bigl(\sum_{j=1}^{m}a_{ij}Z_j\Bigr)\Bigl(\sum_{l=1}^{m}a_{kl}Z_l\Bigr)\Bigr]=\sum_{j=1}^{m}\sum_{l=1}^{m}a_{ij}\,a_{kl}\,\mathbb{E}[Z_jZ_l].

For jlj\ne l, the pair Zj,ZlZ_j,Z_l is independent (a pair from an independent family is independent, directly from that definition), and both are integrable, so E[ZjZl]=E[Zj]E[Zl]=0\mathbb{E}[Z_jZ_l]=\mathbb{E}[Z_j]\,\mathbb{E}[Z_l]=0 by Expectation of a Product of Independent Random Variables; and E[Zj2]=1\mathbb{E}[Z_j^{2}]=1. Hence Cov(Xi,Xk)=j=1maijakj\operatorname{Cov}(X_i,X_k)=\sum_{j=1}^{m}a_{ij}a_{kj}.

Claim 3. The mean vector and covariance matrix are defined from X1,,XdX_1,\dots,X_d alone, so they are representation-independent, and Claim 2 evaluates them in any representation. Symmetry follows from the formula of Claim 2 and commutativity of real multiplication. For positive semidefiniteness, exchanging the order of the finite sums,

i=1dk=1dcickΣik=j=1m(i=1dciaij)(k=1dckakj)=j=1m(i=1dciaij)20.\sum_{i=1}^{d}\sum_{k=1}^{d}c_i\,c_k\,\Sigma_{ik}=\sum_{j=1}^{m}\Bigl(\sum_{i=1}^{d}c_i\,a_{ij}\Bigr)\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{d}c_k\,a_{kj}\Bigr)=\sum_{j=1}^{m}\Bigl(\sum_{i=1}^{d}c_i\,a_{ij}\Bigr)^{2}\ge0 .

Claim 4. Applying Existence of Independent Sequences with Prescribed Distributions with every prescribed distribution equal to the standard normal distribution yields a probability space carrying an independent sequence of standard normal random variables. Given independent standard normals Z1,,ZmZ_1,\dots,Z_m on any probability space and real numbers (μi)(\mu_i), (aij)(a_{ij}), the functions Xi=μi+jaijZjX_i=\mu_i+\sum_{j}a_{ij}Z_j are random variables by the closure preliminaries of Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product, and the defining equalities hold at every point of Ω\Omega, hence with probability 11; so (m,(μi),(aij),(Zj))\bigl(m,(\mu_i),(a_{ij}),(Z_j)\bigr) is a Gaussian representation of (X1,,Xd)(X_1,\dots,X_d) in the sense of Gaussian Random Vectors and Jointly Gaussian Random Variables. \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…