TheoremBase

Proof

Preliminary: the members of I\mathcal{I} and of R\mathcal{R} are Euclidean open. Let p,qp,q be real and let x∈(p,q)x\in(p,q), so that p<xp<x and x<qx<q. Put δ=min⁡(x−p,q−x)\delta=\min(x-p,q-x), a positive real number. Every real yy with x−δ<y<x+δx-\delta<y<x+\delta satisfies y>x−(x−p)=py>x-(x-p)=p and y<x+(q−x)=qy<x+(q-x)=q, hence lies in (p,q)(p,q); by Euclidean Open Box Criterion in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, applied in R1\mathbb{R}^1, the interval (p,q)(p,q) is Euclidean open, the criterion being satisfied vacuously when the interval is empty. Likewise, if aa is real and a<xa<x, then with δ=x−a\delta=x-a every real yy with x−δ<y<x+δx-\delta<y<x+\delta satisfies y>ay>a, so every ray is Euclidean open. Since B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) contains every Euclidean open subset of R\mathbb{R}, we get I⊆B(R)\mathcal{I}\subseteq\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) and R⊆B(R)\mathcal{R}\subseteq\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}).

Claim 1. Let UU be Euclidean open. If UU is empty, take Ik=(0,0)I_k=(0,0) for every kk: this interval belongs to I\mathcal{I} because 00 is rational, and it is empty because no real xx satisfies both 0<x0<x and x<0x<0, so the union of the IkI_k is UU.

Suppose now that UU is nonempty, and let DD be the set of those θ∈Q2\theta\in\mathbb{Q}^2 for which the open interval (θ1,θ2)(\theta_1,\theta_2) is contained in UU.

First, every point of UU lies in an interval indexed by DD. Indeed, let x∈Ux\in U. By Euclidean Open Box Criterion in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, applied in R1\mathbb{R}^1, there is a real δ>0\delta>0 such that every real yy with x−δ<y<x+δx-\delta<y<x+\delta lies in UU. By claim 1 of The Rational Numbers are Dense in the Real Numbers there are rationals pp and qq with x−δ<p<xx-\delta<p<x and x<q<x+δx<q<x+\delta. Every yy with p<y<qp<y<q then satisfies x−δ<y<x+δx-\delta<y<x+\delta and so lies in UU; hence (p,q)⊆U(p,q)\subseteq U, the pair (p,q)(p,q) belongs to DD, and x∈(p,q)x\in(p,q).

In particular DD is nonempty. By claim 3 of The Integers and the Rational Numbers are Countable the set Q2\mathbb{Q}^2 is countable, so its subset DD is countable by claim 3 of Basic Properties of Countable Sets. Being countable and nonempty, DD is the set of terms of a sequence (θk)k∈N(\theta^k)_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in DD. Put Ik=(θ1k,θ2k)I_k=(\theta^k_1,\theta^k_2); each IkI_k belongs to I\mathcal{I} and is contained in UU, so ⋃kIk⊆U\bigcup_{k}I_k\subseteq U. Conversely each x∈Ux\in U lies in an interval (θ1,θ2)(\theta_1,\theta_2) with θ∈D\theta\in D by the previous paragraph, and θ\theta is a term θk\theta^k of the sequence, so x∈Ikx\in I_k. Hence U=⋃k∈NIkU=\bigcup_{k\in\mathbb{N}}I_k.

Claim 2. By Generated Sigma-Algebra a generated σ\sigma-algebra is the smallest one containing the generating family. From I⊆B(R)\mathcal{I}\subseteq\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) we get σ(I)⊆B(R)\sigma(\mathcal{I})\subseteq\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}). Conversely, by claim 1 every Euclidean open subset of R\mathbb{R} is a union of a sequence of members of I\mathcal{I} and hence lies in σ(I)\sigma(\mathcal{I}), which is closed under countable unions; as B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) is the smallest σ\sigma-algebra containing the Euclidean open sets, B(R)⊆σ(I)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\subseteq\sigma(\mathcal{I}). Therefore B(R)=σ(I)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})=\sigma(\mathcal{I}).

Similarly R⊆B(R)\mathcal{R}\subseteq\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) gives σ(R)⊆B(R)\sigma(\mathcal{R})\subseteq\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}). For the reverse inclusion let (hk)k∈N(h_k)_{k\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence of positive real numbers with limit 00, which exists by Existence of a Sequence of Positive Real Numbers with Limit Zero, and fix a real number qq. Then

⋂k∈N{x∈R:q−hk<x}={x∈R:q≤x}.\bigcap_{k\in\mathbb{N}}\{x\in\mathbb{R}:q-h_k<x\}=\{x\in\mathbb{R}:q\le x\}.

Indeed, if q≤xq\le x then q−hk<q≤xq-h_k<q\le x for every kk, because hk>0h_k>0; and if x<qx<q then q−x>0q-x>0, so, the sequence having limit 00 and positive terms, there is kk with hk<q−xh_k<q-x, that is x<q−hkx<q-h_k, and xx fails to lie in the kk-th set. Each set in the intersection belongs to R\mathcal{R}, and a σ\sigma-algebra is closed under countable intersections by Sigma-Algebra and Measurable Space, so {x∈R:q≤x}\{x\in\mathbb{R}:q\le x\} lies in σ(R)\sigma(\mathcal{R}) and hence so does its complement {x∈R:x<q}\{x\in\mathbb{R}:x<q\}. For any reals p,qp,q we therefore have

(p,q)={x∈R:p<x}∩{x∈R:x<q}∈σ(R).(p,q)=\{x\in\mathbb{R}:p<x\}\cap\{x\in\mathbb{R}:x<q\}\in\sigma(\mathcal{R}).

In particular I⊆σ(R)\mathcal{I}\subseteq\sigma(\mathcal{R}), so B(R)=σ(I)⊆σ(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})=\sigma(\mathcal{I})\subseteq\sigma(\mathcal{R}), and the two σ\sigma-algebras coincide.

Claim 3. Suppose ff is measurable. Each ray is Borel by the preliminary step, and {x∈X:f(x)>a}\{x\in X:f(x)>a\} is the preimage under ff of the ray {t∈R:a<t}\{t\in\mathbb{R}:a<t\}, so it lies in F\mathcal{F}. Conversely, suppose {x∈X:f(x)>a}∈F\{x\in X:f(x)>a\}\in\mathcal{F} for every real aa. Then the preimage under ff of every member of R\mathcal{R} lies in F\mathcal{F}, and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) is generated by R\mathcal{R} by claim 2, so claim 2 of Generator Criterion for Measurability makes ff measurable with respect to F\mathcal{F} and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…