TheoremBase

Proof of Rational Intervals and Rays Generate the Borel Sigma-Algebra of the Real Line

lemmalem:borel-real-generators-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: First published proof: rational exhaustion of an open set from countability of the rational pairs and density of the rationals; the rays reach the intervals through a positive null sequence; the measurability criterion then follows from the generator criterion.

Proof

Preliminary: the members of I\mathcal{I} and of R\mathcal{R} are Euclidean open. Let p,qp,q be real and let x(p,q)x\in(p,q), so that p<xp<x and x<qx<q. Put δ=min(xp,qx)\delta=\min(x-p,q-x), a positive real number. Every real yy with xδ<y<x+δx-\delta<y<x+\delta satisfies y>x(xp)=py>x-(x-p)=p and y<x+(qx)=qy<x+(q-x)=q, hence lies in (p,q)(p,q); by Euclidean Open Box Criterion in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, applied in R1\mathbb{R}^1, the interval (p,q)(p,q) is Euclidean open, the criterion being satisfied vacuously when the interval is empty. Likewise, if aa is real and a<xa<x, then with δ=xa\delta=x-a every real yy with xδ<y<x+δx-\delta<y<x+\delta satisfies y>ay>a, so every ray is Euclidean open. Since B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) contains every Euclidean open subset of R\mathbb{R}, we get IB(R)\mathcal{I}\subseteq\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) and RB(R)\mathcal{R}\subseteq\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}).

Claim 1. Let UU be Euclidean open. If UU is empty, take Ik=(0,0)I_k=(0,0) for every kk: this interval belongs to I\mathcal{I} because 00 is rational, and it is empty because no real xx satisfies both 0<x0<x and x<0x<0, so the union of the IkI_k is UU.

Suppose now that UU is nonempty, and let DD be the set of those θQ2\theta\in\mathbb{Q}^2 for which the open interval (θ1,θ2)(\theta_1,\theta_2) is contained in UU.

First, every point of UU lies in an interval indexed by DD. Indeed, let xUx\in U. By Euclidean Open Box Criterion in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, applied in R1\mathbb{R}^1, there is a real δ>0\delta>0 such that every real yy with xδ<y<x+δx-\delta<y<x+\delta lies in UU. By claim 1 of The Rational Numbers are Dense in the Real Numbers there are rationals pp and qq with xδ<p<xx-\delta<p<x and x<q<x+δx<q<x+\delta. Every yy with p<y<qp<y<q then satisfies xδ<y<x+δx-\delta<y<x+\delta and so lies in UU; hence (p,q)U(p,q)\subseteq U, the pair (p,q)(p,q) belongs to DD, and x(p,q)x\in(p,q).

In particular DD is nonempty. By claim 3 of The Integers and the Rational Numbers are Countable the set Q2\mathbb{Q}^2 is countable, so its subset DD is countable by claim 3 of Basic Properties of Countable Sets. Being countable and nonempty, DD is the set of terms of a sequence (θk)kN(\theta^k)_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in DD. Put Ik=(θ1k,θ2k)I_k=(\theta^k_1,\theta^k_2); each IkI_k belongs to I\mathcal{I} and is contained in UU, so kIkU\bigcup_{k}I_k\subseteq U. Conversely each xUx\in U lies in an interval (θ1,θ2)(\theta_1,\theta_2) with θD\theta\in D by the previous paragraph, and θ\theta is a term θk\theta^k of the sequence, so xIkx\in I_k. Hence U=kNIkU=\bigcup_{k\in\mathbb{N}}I_k.

Claim 2. By Generated Sigma-Algebra a generated σ\sigma-algebra is the smallest one containing the generating family. From IB(R)\mathcal{I}\subseteq\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) we get σ(I)B(R)\sigma(\mathcal{I})\subseteq\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}). Conversely, by claim 1 every Euclidean open subset of R\mathbb{R} is a union of a sequence of members of I\mathcal{I} and hence lies in σ(I)\sigma(\mathcal{I}), which is closed under countable unions; as B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) is the smallest σ\sigma-algebra containing the Euclidean open sets, B(R)σ(I)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\subseteq\sigma(\mathcal{I}). Therefore B(R)=σ(I)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})=\sigma(\mathcal{I}).

Similarly RB(R)\mathcal{R}\subseteq\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) gives σ(R)B(R)\sigma(\mathcal{R})\subseteq\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}). For the reverse inclusion let (hk)kN(h_k)_{k\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence of positive real numbers with limit 00, which exists by Existence of a Sequence of Positive Real Numbers with Limit Zero, and fix a real number qq. Then

kN{xR:qhk<x}={xR:qx}.\bigcap_{k\in\mathbb{N}}\{x\in\mathbb{R}:q-h_k<x\}=\{x\in\mathbb{R}:q\le x\}.

Indeed, if qxq\le x then qhk<qxq-h_k<q\le x for every kk, because hk>0h_k>0; and if x<qx<q then qx>0q-x>0, so, the sequence having limit 00 and positive terms, there is kk with hk<qxh_k<q-x, that is x<qhkx<q-h_k, and xx fails to lie in the kk-th set. Each set in the intersection belongs to R\mathcal{R}, and a σ\sigma-algebra is closed under countable intersections by Sigma-Algebra and Measurable Space, so {xR:qx}\{x\in\mathbb{R}:q\le x\} lies in σ(R)\sigma(\mathcal{R}) and hence so does its complement {xR:x<q}\{x\in\mathbb{R}:x<q\}. For any reals p,qp,q we therefore have

(p,q)={xR:p<x}{xR:x<q}σ(R).(p,q)=\{x\in\mathbb{R}:p<x\}\cap\{x\in\mathbb{R}:x<q\}\in\sigma(\mathcal{R}).

In particular Iσ(R)\mathcal{I}\subseteq\sigma(\mathcal{R}), so B(R)=σ(I)σ(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})=\sigma(\mathcal{I})\subseteq\sigma(\mathcal{R}), and the two σ\sigma-algebras coincide.

Claim 3. Suppose ff is measurable. Each ray is Borel by the preliminary step, and {xX:f(x)>a}\{x\in X:f(x)>a\} is the preimage under ff of the ray {tR:a<t}\{t\in\mathbb{R}:a<t\}, so it lies in F\mathcal{F}. Conversely, suppose {xX:f(x)>a}F\{x\in X:f(x)>a\}\in\mathcal{F} for every real aa. Then the preimage under ff of every member of R\mathcal{R} lies in F\mathcal{F}, and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) is generated by R\mathcal{R} by claim 2, so claim 2 of Generator Criterion for Measurability makes ff measurable with respect to F\mathcal{F} and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}).

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…