TheoremBase

Claim 1 is the sibling cylindrical-integral lemma applied on the entropy domain. Claims 2 and 3 follow from the pairing of the noise score field with noise gradients (which gives the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck functional), the explicit formula for the operator, and the coordinate formula for the squared noise norm of the gradient, integrated term by term.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Throughout, the notation and background of Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation are in force by A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §background, so Integrals of Bounded C^2 Cylindrical Functions are Noise Intrinsic Test Functions with the Noise Gradient as Gradient, which is stated in that setting, applies to nn, ff, φ=f∘pn\varphi=f\circ p_{n} and UφU_{\varphi}. By The Gaussian Entropy Pair on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Relative Entropy and the Noise Score Field §score-domain and The Gaussian Entropy Pair on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Relative Entropy and the Noise Score Field §penalty-domain we have DΣ⊆D⊆Pρa\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\subseteq\mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} and D⊆P2(X)\mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{P}_{2}(X).

Claim 1. Since D⊆Pρa\mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, Integrals of Bounded C^2 Cylindrical Functions are Noise Intrinsic Test Functions with the Noise Gradient as Gradient §test, applied with Q=DQ=\mathcal{D}, shows that UφU_{\varphi} is a noise intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D}, and for μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}, which lies in Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, Integrals of Bounded C^2 Cylindrical Functions are Noise Intrinsic Test Functions with the Noise Gradient as Gradient §gradient gives ∇Uφ(μ)=∇aφ\nabla U_{\varphi}(\mu)=\nabla_{a}\varphi in L2(μ;Xa)L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}).

Claim 2. Let μ∈DΣ\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}. Then μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}, so ∇Uφ(μ)=∇aφ\nabla U_{\varphi}(\mu)=\nabla_{a}\varphi by claim 1, and Σ(μ)=β Zμa\Sigma(\mu)=\beta\,Z^{a}_{\mu} with ZμaZ^{a}_{\mu} the noise score field of μ\mu, by The Gaussian Entropy Pair on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Relative Entropy and the Noise Score Field §pair. By The Gaussian Entropy Pair on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Relative Entropy and the Noise Score Field §score-domain the measure μ\mu has a relative score with respect to γc\gamma_{c} and finite Fisher information relative to γc\gamma_{c} with weights aa, and μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) since D⊆P2(X)\mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{P}_{2}(X); so the hypotheses of The Noise Score Field of a Measure of Finite Weighted Fisher Information: Existence, Norm, Pairing with Noise Gradients, Head Approximation and Tangency hold for μ\mu, and The Noise Score Field of a Measure of Finite Weighted Fisher Information: Existence, Norm, Pairing with Noise Gradients, Head Approximation and Tangency §pairing-functional, applied with nn and with the function there called gg taken to be f∈Cb2(Rn)f\in C^{2}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), gives

⟨Zμa,∇aφ⟩μ=Lμa(f).\langle Z^{a}_{\mu},\nabla_{a}\varphi\rangle_{\mu}=L^{a}_{\mu}(f).

The space L2(μ;Xa)L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}) is a real Hilbert space by Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §fields, so its inner product is bilinear, and therefore

⟨Σ(μ),∇Uφ(μ)⟩μ=⟨β Zμa,∇aφ⟩μ=β ⟨Zμa,∇aφ⟩μ=β Lμa(f).\langle\Sigma(\mu),\nabla U_{\varphi}(\mu)\rangle_{\mu}=\langle\beta\,Z^{a}_{\mu},\nabla_{a}\varphi\rangle_{\mu}=\beta\,\langle Z^{a}_{\mu},\nabla_{a}\varphi\rangle_{\mu}=\beta\,L^{a}_{\mu}(f).

This is the first equality of claim 2. The second equality is the definition of Lμa(f)L^{a}_{\mu}(f) in The Noise Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Functional of a Probability Measure at a Bounded C^2 Function of Finitely Many Coordinates §functional, applied with μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X), nn and the function there called gg taken to be ff, multiplied by β\beta.

Claim 3. Let μ∈DΣ\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} and r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R}. By claim 1, ∇Uφ(μ)=∇aφ\nabla U_{\varphi}(\mu)=\nabla_{a}\varphi is an element of L2(μ;Xa)L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}), and μ∈DΣ⊆Pρa\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\subseteq\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, so (μ,∇Uφ(μ))(\mu,\nabla U_{\varphi}(\mu)) belongs to the bundle Va(DΣ)\mathcal{V}^{a}(\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}) of The Bundle of Noise Fields over a Set of Measures, First-Order Equation Operators on the Noise Wasserstein Space, and Their Delta-Shifts §bundle, applied with Q=DΣQ=\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}; this is the bundle on which FF is defined, by The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Gaussian Score Drift on a Hilbert Space §operator. That clause, applied with ν=μ\nu=\mu, the real number rr and q=∇aφq=\nabla_{a}\varphi, gives

F(μ,r,∇Uφ(μ))=λ0 r+θ2 ∥∇aφ∥μ2+β ⟨Zμa,∇aφ⟩μ−g(μ),F\bigl(\mu,r,\nabla U_{\varphi}(\mu)\bigr)=\lambda_{0}\,r+\frac{\theta}{2}\,\lVert\nabla_{a}\varphi\rVert_{\mu}^{2}+\beta\,\langle Z^{a}_{\mu},\nabla_{a}\varphi\rangle_{\mu}-g(\mu),

and β ⟨Zμa,∇aφ⟩μ=β Lμa(f)\beta\,\langle Z^{a}_{\mu},\nabla_{a}\varphi\rangle_{\mu}=\beta\,L^{a}_{\mu}(f) by the first equality of claim 2. It remains to compute the norm.

Since f∈Cb2(Rn)f\in C^{2}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), also f∈Cb1(Rn)f\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), as recorded in The Noise Score Field of a Measure of Finite Weighted Fisher Information: Existence, Norm, Pairing with Noise Gradients, Head Approximation and Tangency §pairing-functional; so (n,f)(n,f) is a representation of φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X). By Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial, the kk-th partial derivative of φ\varphi is ∂kφ=(∂kf)∘pn\partial_{k}\varphi=(\partial_{k}f)\circ p_{n} for k∈[n]k\in[n]. Hence the formula for the noise gradient in The Noise Gradient of a Cylindrical Function and the Noise Tangent Space at a Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space §gradient, computed with the representation (n,f)(n,f), gives for every x∈Xx\in X

∣∇aφ(x)∣a2=∑k=1nak (∂kφ(x))2=∑k=1nak ∂kf(pn(x))2.|\nabla_{a}\varphi(x)|_{a}^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\,\bigl(\partial_{k}\varphi(x)\bigr)^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\,\partial_{k}f(p_{n}(x))^{2}.

By Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §fields, the norm ∥⋅∥μ\lVert\cdot\rVert_{\mu} is that of The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §operations with E=XaE=X^{a}, so ∥∇aφ∥μ2=∫X∣∇aφ∣a2 dμ\lVert\nabla_{a}\varphi\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\int_{X}|\nabla_{a}\varphi|_{a}^{2}\,d\mu, the square of the nonnegative square root of a nonnegative real number being that number. For k∈[n]k\in[n] the function ∂kφ\partial_{k}\varphi is Borel by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §bounded-borel, so (∂kφ)2=∣∂kφ∣2(\partial_{k}\varphi)^{2}=|\partial_{k}\varphi|^{2} is measurable and nonnegative by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §measurable-power with p=2p=2, and its integral with respect to μ\mu is finite, ∂kφ\partial_{k}\varphi being 22-integrable with respect to μ\mu by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §square-integrable in the sense of Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §space. The additivity and the positive homogeneity of the integral of nonnegative measurable functions in Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative, applied n−1n-1 times and nn times respectively with the nonnegative coefficients aka_{k}, give

∥∇aφ∥μ2=∫X∑k=1nak ∂kf(pn(x))2 μ(dx)=∑k=1nak∫X∂kf(pn(x))2 μ(dx),\lVert\nabla_{a}\varphi\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\int_{X}\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\,\partial_{k}f(p_{n}(x))^{2}\,\mu(dx)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\int_{X}\partial_{k}f(p_{n}(x))^{2}\,\mu(dx),

a finite sum of real numbers. Substituting this and β ⟨Zμa,∇aφ⟩μ=β Lμa(f)\beta\,\langle Z^{a}_{\mu},\nabla_{a}\varphi\rangle_{\mu}=\beta\,L^{a}_{\mu}(f) into the expression for F(μ,r,∇Uφ(μ))F\bigl(\mu,r,\nabla U_{\varphi}(\mu)\bigr) gives the display of claim 3.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…