Throughout we use the reading fixed in the statement: an element of is a map from to , and for the notation denotes the value of that map at , as in the definition of tuples in a set.
Claim 1. Let . Both are maps with domain , and for the real numbers and are their respective values at . By the ambient convention for equality of maps recorded in the statement, two maps with the same domain are equal exactly when their values agree at every element of that domain. Hence holds if and only if for every .
Claim 2. Suppose a real number is assigned to each . This assignment attaches to each element of exactly one element of , so it is a map from to ; call it . Then , and its value at is , that is, for every . This proves existence. For uniqueness, let also satisfy for every . Then for every , so by claim 1.
Claim 3. Assume first that a map is given for each . Fix . The assignment sending each to the real number satisfies the hypothesis of claim 2, so there is exactly one element of whose -th component is for every ; denote it by . Since exactly one element of is attached in this way to each , this defines a map , and by construction for every and every .
For uniqueness, let also satisfy for every and every . Fix . Then and are elements of with for every , so by claim 1. Thus and are maps with the same domain whose values agree at every element of , so by the ambient convention for equality of maps.
For the converse statement, let be a map and for each let be defined by ; each attaches exactly one real number to each and so is indeed a map from to . These maps satisfy for every and every , which is the defining property above; by the uniqueness just proved, is the unique map determined by .
Loadingβ¦
Prerequisites
04c04237-75fd-47b3-b235-bcbc67ff200f