TheoremBase

Proof

Write 2=1+12=1+1; then 0<20<2 and 0<2−10<2^{-1} by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and a2\tfrac{a}{2} abbreviates a⋅2−1a\cdot 2^{-1}.

A nonnegativity remark. Let t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0≤t0\le t and t≤1t\le 1, and let ν∈R\nu\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0≤ν0\le\nu. Then 0≤1−t0\le 1-t by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and applying claim 5 of that lemma to 0≤1−t0\le 1-t with the nonnegative factor tt, together with claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field, gives 0≤t(1−t)0\le t(1-t). Applying claim 5 twice more, with the nonnegative factors 2−12^{-1} and ν\nu, gives

0≤12 t(1−t) ν.0\le\tfrac{1}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\nu .

Claim 1. Let z,z′∈Cz,z'\in C and let t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0≤t0\le t and t≤1t\le1. By the definition of CC there are ξ,ξ′∈C1\xi,\xi'\in C_{1} and η,η′∈C2\eta,\eta'\in C_{2} with z=ι(ξ,η)z=\iota(\xi,\eta) and z′=ι(ξ′,η′)z'=\iota(\xi',\eta'). By claim 2 of Concatenation Identifies a Product of Euclidean Spaces with a Euclidean Space,

t z=ι(tξ,tη),(1−t) z′=ι((1−t)ξ′,(1−t)η′),t\,z=\iota(t\xi,t\eta),\qquad (1-t)\,z'=\iota\bigl((1-t)\xi',(1-t)\eta'\bigr),

and, adding these,

t z+(1−t) z′=ι(tξ+(1−t)ξ′, tη+(1−t)η′).t\,z+(1-t)\,z'=\iota\bigl(t\xi+(1-t)\xi',\ t\eta+(1-t)\eta'\bigr).

Since C1C_{1} and C2C_{2} are convex, tξ+(1−t)ξ′∈C1t\xi+(1-t)\xi'\in C_{1} and tη+(1−t)η′∈C2t\eta+(1-t)\eta'\in C_{2}, so the point above lies in CC. As z,z′z,z' and tt were arbitrary, CC is convex by Convex Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n.

Claim 2. From 0≤μ10\le\mu_{1} and μ1≤μ\mu_{1}\le\mu we get 0≤μ0\le\mu by transitivity of the order.

By Quadratic Increment Characterisation of Semiconvexity, applied to ww on the convex set CC with the constant μ\mu, it suffices to prove that

w(t z+(1−t) z′)≤t w(z)+(1−t) w(z′)+μ2 t(1−t) ∥z−z′∥2w\bigl(t\,z+(1-t)\,z'\bigr)\le t\,w(z)+(1-t)\,w(z')+\frac{\mu}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\lVert z-z'\rVert^{2}

for all z,z′∈Cz,z'\in C and every t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} with 0≤t0\le t and t≤1t\le1. Fix such z,z′,tz,z',t and write z=ι(ξ,η)z=\iota(\xi,\eta), z′=ι(ξ′,η′)z'=\iota(\xi',\eta') as in claim 1, and put ζ1=tξ+(1−t)ξ′∈C1\zeta_{1}=t\xi+(1-t)\xi'\in C_{1} and ζ2=tη+(1−t)η′∈C2\zeta_{2}=t\eta+(1-t)\eta'\in C_{2}. By claim 1, t z+(1−t) z′=ι(ζ1,ζ2)t\,z+(1-t)\,z'=\iota(\zeta_{1},\zeta_{2}), so by the defining property of ww,

w(t z+(1−t) z′)=u1(ζ1)+u2(ζ2).w\bigl(t\,z+(1-t)\,z'\bigr)=u_{1}(\zeta_{1})+u_{2}(\zeta_{2}).

Applying Quadratic Increment Characterisation of Semiconvexity to u1u_{1} on C1C_{1} and to u2u_{2} on C2C_{2},

u1(ζ1)≤t u1(ξ)+(1−t) u1(ξ′)+μ12 t(1−t) ∥ξ−ξ′∥2,u_{1}(\zeta_{1})\le t\,u_{1}(\xi)+(1-t)\,u_{1}(\xi')+\frac{\mu_{1}}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\lVert\xi-\xi'\rVert^{2}, u2(ζ2)≤t u2(η)+(1−t) u2(η′)+μ22 t(1−t) ∥η−η′∥2.u_{2}(\zeta_{2})\le t\,u_{2}(\eta)+(1-t)\,u_{2}(\eta')+\frac{\mu_{2}}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\lVert\eta-\eta'\rVert^{2}.

By claim 1 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square the numbers ∥ξ−ξ′∥\lVert\xi-\xi'\rVert and ∥η−η′∥\lVert\eta-\eta'\rVert are nonnegative, hence so are their squares by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field. So the nonnegativity remark applies with ν=∥ξ−ξ′∥2\nu=\lVert\xi-\xi'\rVert^{2} and with ν=∥η−η′∥2\nu=\lVert\eta-\eta'\rVert^{2}, and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied to μ1≤μ\mu_{1}\le\mu and to μ2≤μ\mu_{2}\le\mu with these nonnegative factors, gives

μ12 t(1−t) ∥ξ−ξ′∥2≤μ2 t(1−t) ∥ξ−ξ′∥2,μ22 t(1−t) ∥η−η′∥2≤μ2 t(1−t) ∥η−η′∥2.\frac{\mu_{1}}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\lVert\xi-\xi'\rVert^{2}\le\frac{\mu}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\lVert\xi-\xi'\rVert^{2},\qquad \frac{\mu_{2}}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\lVert\eta-\eta'\rVert^{2}\le\frac{\mu}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\lVert\eta-\eta'\rVert^{2}.

Adding the four inequalities just obtained — each is equivalent by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field to the nonnegativity of a difference, the sum of nonnegative differences is nonnegative by claim 2 there, and claim 3 converts back — and using w(z)=u1(ξ)+u2(η)w(z)=u_{1}(\xi)+u_{2}(\eta) and w(z′)=u1(ξ′)+u2(η′)w(z')=u_{1}(\xi')+u_{2}(\eta') together with distributivity, we obtain

w(t z+(1−t) z′)≤t w(z)+(1−t) w(z′)+μ2 t(1−t) (∥ξ−ξ′∥2+∥η−η′∥2).w\bigl(t\,z+(1-t)\,z'\bigr)\le t\,w(z)+(1-t)\,w(z')+\frac{\mu}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\Bigl(\lVert\xi-\xi'\rVert^{2}+\lVert\eta-\eta'\rVert^{2}\Bigr).

Finally, by claim 2 of Concatenation Identifies a Product of Euclidean Spaces with a Euclidean Space we have z−z′=ι(ξ−ξ′,η−η′)z-z'=\iota(\xi-\xi',\eta-\eta'), and then claim 3 of that lemma gives

∥z−z′∥2=∥ξ−ξ′∥2+∥η−η′∥2.\lVert z-z'\rVert^{2}=\lVert\xi-\xi'\rVert^{2}+\lVert\eta-\eta'\rVert^{2}.

Substituting this into the previous display yields exactly the required inequality, so ww is semiconvex on CC with constant μ\mu.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…