Write 2=1+1; then 0<2 and 0<2−1 by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and 2a abbreviates a⋅2−1.
A nonnegativity remark. Let t∈R satisfy 0≤t and t≤1, and let ν∈R satisfy 0≤ν. Then 0≤1−t by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and applying claim 5 of that lemma to 0≤1−t with the nonnegative factor t, together with claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field, gives 0≤t(1−t). Applying claim 5 twice more, with the nonnegative factors 2−1 and ν, gives
0≤21t(1−t)ν.
Claim 1. Let z,z′∈C and let t∈R satisfy 0≤t and t≤1. By the definition of C there are ξ,ξ′∈C1 and η,η′∈C2 with z=ι(ξ,η) and z′=ι(ξ′,η′). By claim 2 of Concatenation Identifies a Product of Euclidean Spaces with a Euclidean Space,
tz=ι(tξ,tη),(1−t)z′=ι((1−t)ξ′,(1−t)η′),
and, adding these,
tz+(1−t)z′=ι(tξ+(1−t)ξ′, tη+(1−t)η′).
Since C1 and C2 are convex, tξ+(1−t)ξ′∈C1 and tη+(1−t)η′∈C2, so the point above lies in C. As z,z′ and t were arbitrary, C is convex by Convex Subset of Rn.
Claim 2. From 0≤μ1 and μ1≤μ we get 0≤μ by transitivity of the order.
By Quadratic Increment Characterisation of Semiconvexity, applied to w on the convex set C with the constant μ, it suffices to prove that
w(tz+(1−t)z′)≤tw(z)+(1−t)w(z′)+2μt(1−t)∥z−z′∥2
for all z,z′∈C and every t∈R with 0≤t and t≤1. Fix such z,z′,t and write z=ι(ξ,η), z′=ι(ξ′,η′) as in claim 1, and put ζ1=tξ+(1−t)ξ′∈C1 and ζ2=tη+(1−t)η′∈C2. By claim 1, tz+(1−t)z′=ι(ζ1,ζ2), so by the defining property of w,
w(tz+(1−t)z′)=u1(ζ1)+u2(ζ2).
Applying Quadratic Increment Characterisation of Semiconvexity to u1 on C1 and to u2 on C2,
u1(ζ1)≤tu1(ξ)+(1−t)u1(ξ′)+2μ1t(1−t)∥ξ−ξ′∥2,
u2(ζ2)≤tu2(η)+(1−t)u2(η′)+2μ2t(1−t)∥η−η′∥2.
By claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn the numbers ∥ξ−ξ′∥ and ∥η−η′∥ are nonnegative, hence so are their squares by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field. So the nonnegativity remark applies with ν=∥ξ−ξ′∥2 and with ν=∥η−η′∥2, and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied to μ1≤μ and to μ2≤μ with these nonnegative factors, gives
2μ1t(1−t)∥ξ−ξ′∥2≤2μt(1−t)∥ξ−ξ′∥2,2μ2t(1−t)∥η−η′∥2≤2μt(1−t)∥η−η′∥2.
Adding the four inequalities just obtained — each is equivalent by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field to the nonnegativity of a difference, the sum of nonnegative differences is nonnegative by claim 2 there, and claim 3 converts back — and using w(z)=u1(ξ)+u2(η) and w(z′)=u1(ξ′)+u2(η′) together with distributivity, we obtain
w(tz+(1−t)z′)≤tw(z)+(1−t)w(z′)+2μt(1−t)(∥ξ−ξ′∥2+∥η−η′∥2).
Finally, by claim 2 of Concatenation Identifies a Product of Euclidean Spaces with a Euclidean Space we have z−z′=ι(ξ−ξ′,η−η′), and then claim 3 of that lemma gives
∥z−z′∥2=∥ξ−ξ′∥2+∥η−η′∥2.
Substituting this into the previous display yields exactly the required inequality, so w is semiconvex on C with constant μ.