TheoremBase

Proof of A Sum in Separated Variables of Semiconvex Functions is Semiconvex

lemmalem:separated-sum-semiconvex-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: First publication of the proof of lem:separated-sum-semiconvex-2026a, via the quadratic increment characterisation of semiconvexity and the linearity and norm identities of the concatenation map.

Proof

Write 2=1+12=1+1; then 0<20<2 and 0<210<2^{-1} by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and a2\tfrac{a}{2} abbreviates a21a\cdot 2^{-1}.

A nonnegativity remark. Let tRt\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0t0\le t and t1t\le 1, and let νR\nu\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0ν0\le\nu. Then 01t0\le 1-t by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and applying claim 5 of that lemma to 01t0\le 1-t with the nonnegative factor tt, together with claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field, gives 0t(1t)0\le t(1-t). Applying claim 5 twice more, with the nonnegative factors 212^{-1} and ν\nu, gives

012t(1t)ν.0\le\tfrac{1}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\nu .

Claim 1. Let z,zCz,z'\in C and let tRt\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0t0\le t and t1t\le1. By the definition of CC there are ξ,ξC1\xi,\xi'\in C_{1} and η,ηC2\eta,\eta'\in C_{2} with z=ι(ξ,η)z=\iota(\xi,\eta) and z=ι(ξ,η)z'=\iota(\xi',\eta'). By claim 2 of Concatenation Identifies a Product of Euclidean Spaces with a Euclidean Space,

tz=ι(tξ,tη),(1t)z=ι((1t)ξ,(1t)η),t\,z=\iota(t\xi,t\eta),\qquad (1-t)\,z'=\iota\bigl((1-t)\xi',(1-t)\eta'\bigr),

and, adding these,

tz+(1t)z=ι(tξ+(1t)ξ, tη+(1t)η).t\,z+(1-t)\,z'=\iota\bigl(t\xi+(1-t)\xi',\ t\eta+(1-t)\eta'\bigr).

Since C1C_{1} and C2C_{2} are convex, tξ+(1t)ξC1t\xi+(1-t)\xi'\in C_{1} and tη+(1t)ηC2t\eta+(1-t)\eta'\in C_{2}, so the point above lies in CC. As z,zz,z' and tt were arbitrary, CC is convex by Convex Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n.

Claim 2. From 0μ10\le\mu_{1} and μ1μ\mu_{1}\le\mu we get 0μ0\le\mu by transitivity of the order.

By Quadratic Increment Characterisation of Semiconvexity, applied to ww on the convex set CC with the constant μ\mu, it suffices to prove that

w(tz+(1t)z)tw(z)+(1t)w(z)+μ2t(1t)zz2w\bigl(t\,z+(1-t)\,z'\bigr)\le t\,w(z)+(1-t)\,w(z')+\frac{\mu}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\lVert z-z'\rVert^{2}

for all z,zCz,z'\in C and every tRt\in\mathbb{R} with 0t0\le t and t1t\le1. Fix such z,z,tz,z',t and write z=ι(ξ,η)z=\iota(\xi,\eta), z=ι(ξ,η)z'=\iota(\xi',\eta') as in claim 1, and put ζ1=tξ+(1t)ξC1\zeta_{1}=t\xi+(1-t)\xi'\in C_{1} and ζ2=tη+(1t)ηC2\zeta_{2}=t\eta+(1-t)\eta'\in C_{2}. By claim 1, tz+(1t)z=ι(ζ1,ζ2)t\,z+(1-t)\,z'=\iota(\zeta_{1},\zeta_{2}), so by the defining property of ww,

w(tz+(1t)z)=u1(ζ1)+u2(ζ2).w\bigl(t\,z+(1-t)\,z'\bigr)=u_{1}(\zeta_{1})+u_{2}(\zeta_{2}).

Applying Quadratic Increment Characterisation of Semiconvexity to u1u_{1} on C1C_{1} and to u2u_{2} on C2C_{2},

u1(ζ1)tu1(ξ)+(1t)u1(ξ)+μ12t(1t)ξξ2,u_{1}(\zeta_{1})\le t\,u_{1}(\xi)+(1-t)\,u_{1}(\xi')+\frac{\mu_{1}}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\lVert\xi-\xi'\rVert^{2}, u2(ζ2)tu2(η)+(1t)u2(η)+μ22t(1t)ηη2.u_{2}(\zeta_{2})\le t\,u_{2}(\eta)+(1-t)\,u_{2}(\eta')+\frac{\mu_{2}}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\lVert\eta-\eta'\rVert^{2}.

By claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n the numbers ξξ\lVert\xi-\xi'\rVert and ηη\lVert\eta-\eta'\rVert are nonnegative, hence so are their squares by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field. So the nonnegativity remark applies with ν=ξξ2\nu=\lVert\xi-\xi'\rVert^{2} and with ν=ηη2\nu=\lVert\eta-\eta'\rVert^{2}, and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied to μ1μ\mu_{1}\le\mu and to μ2μ\mu_{2}\le\mu with these nonnegative factors, gives

μ12t(1t)ξξ2μ2t(1t)ξξ2,μ22t(1t)ηη2μ2t(1t)ηη2.\frac{\mu_{1}}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\lVert\xi-\xi'\rVert^{2}\le\frac{\mu}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\lVert\xi-\xi'\rVert^{2},\qquad \frac{\mu_{2}}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\lVert\eta-\eta'\rVert^{2}\le\frac{\mu}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\lVert\eta-\eta'\rVert^{2}.

Adding the four inequalities just obtained — each is equivalent by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field to the nonnegativity of a difference, the sum of nonnegative differences is nonnegative by claim 2 there, and claim 3 converts back — and using w(z)=u1(ξ)+u2(η)w(z)=u_{1}(\xi)+u_{2}(\eta) and w(z)=u1(ξ)+u2(η)w(z')=u_{1}(\xi')+u_{2}(\eta') together with distributivity, we obtain

w(tz+(1t)z)tw(z)+(1t)w(z)+μ2t(1t)(ξξ2+ηη2).w\bigl(t\,z+(1-t)\,z'\bigr)\le t\,w(z)+(1-t)\,w(z')+\frac{\mu}{2}\,t(1-t)\,\Bigl(\lVert\xi-\xi'\rVert^{2}+\lVert\eta-\eta'\rVert^{2}\Bigr).

Finally, by claim 2 of Concatenation Identifies a Product of Euclidean Spaces with a Euclidean Space we have zz=ι(ξξ,ηη)z-z'=\iota(\xi-\xi',\eta-\eta'), and then claim 3 of that lemma gives

zz2=ξξ2+ηη2.\lVert z-z'\rVert^{2}=\lVert\xi-\xi'\rVert^{2}+\lVert\eta-\eta'\rVert^{2}.

Substituting this into the previous display yields exactly the required inequality, so ww is semiconvex on CC with constant μ\mu.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…