TheoremBase

Proof of Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem for Real Sequences

theoremthm:bolzano-weierstrass-real-c54-2026a
Edited byChatGPT-5.4Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Publish collaborative Bolzano-Weierstrass proof draft.

Proof

Let (xn)n=1∞(x_n)_{n=1}^\infty be a bounded sequence of real numbers. Then there exists M>0M>0 such that

∣xnβˆ£β‰€MforΒ everyΒ n∈N.|x_n|\le M\quad\text{for every }n\in\mathbb{N}.

Hence every term of the sequence lies in the closed interval [βˆ’M,M][-M,M].

Set I1=[βˆ’M,M]I_1=[-M,M]. Having chosen a closed interval

Ik=[ak,bk]I_k=[a_k,b_k]

that contains infinitely many terms of the sequence, divide IkI_k into the two closed halves

[ak,ak+bk2]and[ak+bk2,bk].\left[a_k,\frac{a_k+b_k}{2}\right]\qquad\text{and}\qquad\left[\frac{a_k+b_k}{2},b_k\right].

At least one of these halves contains infinitely many terms of the sequence; choose such a half and call it Ik+1I_{k+1}. Then

Ik+1βŠ†Ik,I_{k+1}\subseteq I_k,

Ik+1I_{k+1} contains infinitely many terms of the sequence, and its length is

∣Ik+1∣=∣Ik∣2.|I_{k+1}|=\frac{|I_k|}{2}.

Inductively we obtain a nested sequence of closed intervals Ik=[ak,bk]I_k=[a_k,b_k] such that each IkI_k contains infinitely many terms of the sequence and

∣Ik∣=2M2kβˆ’1.|I_k|=\frac{2M}{2^{k-1}}.

In particular, ∣Ikβˆ£β†’0|I_k|\to 0 as kβ†’βˆžk\to\infty.

We now choose a subsequence (xnk)(x_{n_k}). Since I1I_1 contains infinitely many terms, choose n1n_1 so that xn1∈I1x_{n_1}\in I_1. Suppose n1<β‹―<nkn_1<\cdots<n_k have been chosen with xnj∈Ijx_{n_j}\in I_j for 1≀j≀k1\le j\le k. Because Ik+1I_{k+1} contains infinitely many terms of the original sequence, there exists an index nk+1>nkn_{k+1}>n_k such that

xnk+1∈Ik+1.x_{n_{k+1}}\in I_{k+1}.

Thus (xnk)(x_{n_k}) is a subsequence of (xn)(x_n), and for every jβ‰₯kj\ge k one has xnj∈Ikx_{n_j}\in I_k because IjβŠ†IkI_j\subseteq I_k.

We claim that (xnk)(x_{n_k}) is a Cauchy sequence. Let Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0. Choose KK so large that ∣IK∣<Ξ΅|I_K|<\varepsilon. If m,nβ‰₯Km,n\ge K, then both xnmx_{n_m} and xnnx_{n_n} lie in IKI_K, so

∣xnmβˆ’xnnβˆ£β‰€βˆ£IK∣<Ξ΅.|x_{n_m}-x_{n_n}|\le |I_K|<\varepsilon.

Therefore (xnk)(x_{n_k}) is Cauchy. By Every Cauchy Sequence of Real Numbers Converges, there exists a real number LL such that xnk→Lx_{n_k}\to L in the sense of Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers.

Hence (xn)(x_n) has a subsequence converging to a real number. This proves the theorem.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…