TheoremBase

Each law is checked by cases according to which arguments are real, zero or infinite, reducing to the arithmetic and order of ℝ when all terms are real.

Proof

Preliminaries. By The Extended Real Line, Its Order, and [0,∞] (ii) and The Extended Real Line, Its Order, and [0,∞] (i), every element of [0,∞][0,\infty] is either a real number xx with 0≤x0\le x or ∞\infty, and not both, as ∞∉R\infty\notin\mathbb{R}. By Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (i), Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (ii) and Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (viii), ≤\le is a total order on [−∞,∞][-\infty,\infty] which agrees with the order of R\mathbb{R} on R\mathbb{R}, every x∈[0,∞]x\in[0,\infty] satisfies 0≤x≤∞0\le x\le\infty, and ∞≤x\infty\le x only for x=∞x=\infty. In the real cases below, real arithmetic means the laws of the real numbers for their sum, product and order (The Real Numbers as a Type (iv), The Real Numbers as a Type (v), The Real Numbers as a Type (vi)). We use these facts without repeating the references, together with the following, for x,y∈[0,∞]x,y\in[0,\infty].

(P0) If x≤yx\le y and y∈Ry\in\mathbb{R}, then x∈Rx\in\mathbb{R}: otherwise x=∞x=\infty and ∞≤y\infty\le y gives y=∞∉Ry=\infty\notin\mathbb{R}.

(P1) If x,y∈Rx,y\in\mathbb{R}, then x+yx+y is the real sum; otherwise x+y=∞x+y=\infty. So x+y∈Rx+y\in\mathbb{R} if and only if x,y∈Rx,y\in\mathbb{R}. This is Addition and Multiplication on [0,∞] (i).

(P2) xy=0xy=0 if and only if x=0x=0 or y=0y=0. If x,y∈Rx,y\in\mathbb{R}, this holds as R\mathbb{R} is a field, which has no zero divisors by Rules of Arithmetic in a Commutative Ring: Zero, Signs and Squares, and No Zero Divisors in a Field (iv), and a real product with a factor 00 is 00; otherwise, by Addition and Multiplication on [0,∞] (ii), xy=0xy=0 if x=0x=0 or y=0y=0 and xy=∞≠0xy=\infty\neq0 otherwise, as 0∈R0\in\mathbb{R}.

(P3) If x≠0x\neq0 and y≠0y\neq0, then xyxy is the real product if x,y∈Rx,y\in\mathbb{R}, and xy=∞xy=\infty otherwise, by Addition and Multiplication on [0,∞] (ii).

Proof of (i). Commutativity holds since both the real sum and the conditions in Addition and Multiplication on [0,∞] (i) are symmetric in xx and yy. For x∈[0,∞]x\in[0,\infty], 0+x=x0+x=x: for real xx this is real arithmetic, and 0+∞=∞0+\infty=\infty by (P1); and x+0=0+xx+0=0+x by commutativity. Associativity: if a,b,c∈Ra,b,c\in\mathbb{R}, (a+b)+c=a+(b+c)(a+b)+c=a+(b+c) is real arithmetic, all sums being real by (P1). Otherwise one of a,b,ca,b,c is ∞\infty; if aa or bb is ∞\infty, then a+b=∞a+b=\infty and (a+b)+c=∞(a+b)+c=\infty, and if c=∞c=\infty, then (a+b)+c=∞(a+b)+c=\infty, by (P1); likewise a+(b+c)=∞a+(b+c)=\infty.

Proof of (ii). Commutativity holds since the real product and the cases of Addition and Multiplication on [0,∞] (ii) are symmetric. For x∈[0,∞]x\in[0,\infty], 1x=x1x=x: for real xx this is real arithmetic, and 1⋅∞=∞1\cdot\infty=\infty by (P3), as 1≠01\neq0 and ∞≠0\infty\neq0; and x1=1xx1=1x. Associativity: if one of a,b,ca,b,c is 00, then (ab)c(ab)c and a(bc)a(bc) each have a factor 00 somewhere, so both are 00 by (P2), applied once or twice. Let a,b,c≠0a,b,c\neq0. If a,b,c∈Ra,b,c\in\mathbb{R}, associativity is real arithmetic, all products being real by (P3). Otherwise one of them is ∞\infty. By (P2), ab≠0ab\neq0 and bc≠0bc\neq0; by (P3), ab=∞ab=\infty if aa or bb is ∞\infty, and then (ab)c=∞(ab)c=\infty, while if c=∞c=\infty then (ab)c=∞(ab)c=\infty as well; likewise a(bc)=∞a(bc)=\infty.

Proof of (iii). If a,b,c∈Ra,b,c\in\mathbb{R}, this is real arithmetic, all terms being real by (P1) and Addition and Multiplication on [0,∞] (ii). If a=0a=0, both sides are 00 by (P2), as 0+0=00+0=0. Let a≠0a\neq0. If b=∞b=\infty or c=∞c=\infty, then b+c=∞b+c=\infty by (P1), so a(b+c)=∞a(b+c)=\infty by (P3); and ab=∞ab=\infty or ac=∞ac=\infty by (P3), so ab+ac=∞ab+ac=\infty by (P1). There remains a=∞a=\infty with b,c∈Rb,c\in\mathbb{R}. If b=c=0b=c=0, both sides are 00 by (P2). Otherwise b+cb+c is real and nonzero, as 0≤b0\le b, 0≤c0\le c and b+c=0b+c=0 force b=c=0b=c=0 in R\mathbb{R}; so a(b+c)=∞a(b+c)=\infty by (P3); and one of b,cb,c is nonzero, so one of ab,acab,ac is ∞\infty by (P3), and ab+ac=∞ab+ac=\infty by (P1).

Proof of (iv). Let a≤ba\le b. If b+c=∞b+c=\infty, then a+c≤b+ca+c\le b+c. Otherwise b,c∈Rb,c\in\mathbb{R} by (P1), a∈Ra\in\mathbb{R} by (P0), and a+c≤b+ca+c\le b+c holds in R\mathbb{R}, all sums being real sums by (P1). For the product: if a=0a=0 or c=0c=0, then ac=0≤bcac=0\le bc by (P2). If bc=∞bc=\infty, then ac≤bcac\le bc. Otherwise a≠0a\neq0, c≠0c\neq0 and bc∈Rbc\in\mathbb{R}; also b≠0b\neq0, since a≤b=0a\le b=0 would give a=0a=0; so b,c∈Rb,c\in\mathbb{R} by (P3), a∈Ra\in\mathbb{R} by (P0), and ac≤bcac\le bc holds in R\mathbb{R} as 0≤c0\le c, all products being real products.

Proof of (v). As 0≤c0\le c, (iv) gives 0+a≤c+a0+a\le c+a, that is a≤a+ca\le a+c by (i).

Proof of (vi). Let c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R} and a+c≤b+ca+c\le b+c. If b=∞b=\infty, then a≤ba\le b. Otherwise b∈Rb\in\mathbb{R}, so b+c∈Rb+c\in\mathbb{R} by (P1), a+c∈Ra+c\in\mathbb{R} by (P0), a∈Ra\in\mathbb{R} by (P1), and a≤ba\le b follows from a+c≤b+ca+c\le b+c in R\mathbb{R}.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…