TheoremBase

Countable additivity of the image measure comes from that of the measure through preimages, and of the measure with a density from integrating a series; both integral formulas are proved for nonnegative simple functions, extended by monotone convergence along dyadic approximations, and passed to integrable functions through positive and negative parts.

Proof

Throughout, write ν=μ∘T−1\nu=\mu\circ T^{-1} (Image Measure (i)); for B∈GB\in\mathcal{G} we have T−1(B)∈FT^{-1}(B)\in\mathcal{F} (Measurable Map, and the Set of Measurable Maps (i)), and preimages are computed pointwise by Preimages under a Map: Membership, the Preimage Map, Sequences of Preimages, and the Set of Sets with Preimage in a Given Set (ii). By Integrals over Measurable Subsets (i), h1A∈M+(X,F)h\mathbf{1}_{A}\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}) and

(hμ)(A)=∫Ah dμ=∫Xh1A dμ(A∈F).(h\mu)(A)=\int_{A}h\,d\mu=\int_{X}h\mathbf{1}_{A}\,d\mu\qquad(A\in\mathcal{F}).

The image measure. Since T−1(∅)=∅T^{-1}(\emptyset)=\emptyset, ν(∅)=μ(∅)=0\nu(\emptyset)=\mu(\emptyset)=0. Let (Bm)(B_{m}) be a pairwise disjoint sequence in G\mathcal{G}. The preimages T−1(Bm)T^{-1}(B_{m}) form a sequence in F\mathcal{F} (Preimages under a Map: Membership, the Preimage Map, Sequences of Preimages, and the Set of Sets with Preimage in a Given Set (iv)); it is pairwise disjoint, since a point of T−1(Bm)∩T−1(Bk)T^{-1}(B_{m})\cap T^{-1}(B_{k}) would be mapped by TT into Bm∩Bk=∅B_{m}\cap B_{k}=\emptyset; and T−1(⋃mBm)=⋃mT−1(Bm)T^{-1}\bigl(\bigcup_{m}B_{m}\bigr)=\bigcup_{m}T^{-1}(B_{m}) (Preimages of Unions, Intersections and Complements (i)). Countable additivity of μ\mu (Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (i)) gives

ν(⋃m∈NBm)=μ(⋃m∈NT−1(Bm))=∑m∈Nμ(T−1(Bm))=∑m∈Nν(Bm),\nu\Bigl(\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}B_{m}\Bigr)=\mu\Bigl(\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}T^{-1}(B_{m})\Bigr)=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}\mu\bigl(T^{-1}(B_{m})\bigr)=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}\nu(B_{m}),

so ν\nu is a measure on (Y,G)(Y,\mathcal{G}). As T−1(Y)=XT^{-1}(Y)=X (Preimages of Unions, Intersections and Complements (iv)), ν(Y)=μ(X)\nu(Y)=\mu(X); hence ν(Y)<∞\nu(Y)<\infty if μ(X)<∞\mu(X)<\infty, and ν(Y)=1\nu(Y)=1 if μ(X)=1\mu(X)=1 (Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (iii), Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (v)). This proves (i).

Change of variables for simple functions. Let s∈S+(Y,G)s\in\mathcal{S}^{+}(Y,\mathcal{G}), let C=s[Y]C=s[Y], a finite set, and for c∈Cc\in C let Bc=s−1({c})∈GB_{c}=s^{-1}(\{c\})\in\mathcal{G} (Simple Functions, Nonnegative Simple Functions, and the Simple Integral (iv)). The sets T−1(Bc)T^{-1}(B_{c}), c∈Cc\in C, lie in F\mathcal{F} and are pairwise disjoint, and a point x∈Xx\in X lies in exactly one of them, the one with c=s(T(x))c=s(T(x)). Hence all terms but one of the following sum vanish (Finite Sums: Vanishing Terms, Finite Additivity of Measures, and Finite Sums of Series in [0,∞] (iii)), and

(s∘T)(x)=∑c∈Cc 1T−1(Bc)(x)(x∈X).(s\circ T)(x)=\sum_{c\in C}c\,\mathbf{1}_{T^{-1}(B_{c})}(x)\qquad(x\in X).

By Properties of Simple Functions and of the Simple Integral (iii), s∘T∈S+(X,F)s\circ T\in\mathcal{S}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}) and, with the definition of the simple integral (Simple Functions, Nonnegative Simple Functions, and the Simple Integral (iv)),

Iμ(s∘T)=∑c∈Cc⋅μ(T−1(Bc))=∑c∈Cc⋅ν(Bc)=Iν(s).I_{\mu}(s\circ T)=\sum_{c\in C}c\cdot\mu\bigl(T^{-1}(B_{c})\bigr)=\sum_{c\in C}c\cdot\nu(B_{c})=I_{\nu}(s).

Integrals of nonnegative simple functions are their simple integrals (Basic Properties of the Integral of Nonnegative Measurable Maps (i)), so

∫Ys dν=∫Xs∘T dμ.(1)\int_{Y}s\,d\nu=\int_{X}s\circ T\,d\mu .\tag{1}

Change of variables for nonnegative functions. Let g∈M+(Y,G)g\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(Y,\mathcal{G}). Then g∘T∈M+(X,F)g\circ T\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}) (Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (ii)). For m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} the dyadic approximations satisfy sm(g)∘T=sm(g∘T)s_{m}(g)\circ T=s_{m}(g\circ T) (Precomposition Commutes with Pointwise Operations, and Sections of Functions Are Precompositions (iii)). By Approximation of Measurable Functions by Dyadic Simple Functions (i), (sm(g))m(s_{m}(g))_{m} is a nondecreasing sequence in S+(Y,G)\mathcal{S}^{+}(Y,\mathcal{G}) with pointwise supremum gg, and (sm(g∘T))m(s_{m}(g\circ T))_{m} one in S+(X,F)\mathcal{S}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}) with pointwise supremum g∘Tg\circ T. The monotone convergence theorem (Monotone Convergence Theorem (ii)) on both sides and (1) give

∫Yg dν=sup⁡m∫Ysm(g) dν=sup⁡m∫Xsm(g)∘T dμ=sup⁡m∫Xsm(g∘T) dμ=∫Xg∘T dμ,\int_{Y}g\,d\nu=\sup_{m}\int_{Y}s_{m}(g)\,d\nu=\sup_{m}\int_{X}s_{m}(g)\circ T\,d\mu=\sup_{m}\int_{X}s_{m}(g\circ T)\,d\mu=\int_{X}g\circ T\,d\mu ,

which is (ii).

Change of variables for real functions. Let g:Y→Rg:Y\to\mathbb{R} be measurable. Then g∘Tg\circ T is measurable (Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (ii)), and (g∘T)+=g+∘T(g\circ T)^{+}=g^{+}\circ T and (g∘T)−=g−∘T(g\circ T)^{-}=g^{-}\circ T (Precomposition Commutes with Pointwise Operations, and Sections of Functions Are Precompositions (i)). As g+,g−∈M+(Y,G)g^{+},g^{-}\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(Y,\mathcal{G}) (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (iv)), (ii) gives

∫Yg± dν=∫Xg±∘T dμ=∫X(g∘T)± dμ.\int_{Y}g^{\pm}\,d\nu=\int_{X}g^{\pm}\circ T\,d\mu=\int_{X}(g\circ T)^{\pm}\,d\mu .

So the integrals of g+g^{+} and g−g^{-} with respect to ν\nu are finite exactly when those of (g∘T)+(g\circ T)^{+} and (g∘T)−(g\circ T)^{-} with respect to μ\mu are, which is the asserted equivalence (Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral (i)); and then, by Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral (iii),

∫Yg dν=∫Yg+ dν−∫Yg− dν=∫X(g∘T)+ dμ−∫X(g∘T)− dμ=∫Xg∘T dμ.\int_{Y}g\,d\nu=\int_{Y}g^{+}\,d\nu-\int_{Y}g^{-}\,d\nu=\int_{X}(g\circ T)^{+}\,d\mu-\int_{X}(g\circ T)^{-}\,d\mu=\int_{X}g\circ T\,d\mu .

This proves (iii).

Composition of image measures. S∘T∈Meas(X,F;Z,H)S\circ T\in\mathrm{Meas}(X,\mathcal{F};Z,\mathcal{H}) by Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (ii), and ν∘S−1\nu\circ S^{-1} is defined since ν\nu is a measure by (i). For E∈HE\in\mathcal{H} we have (S∘T)−1(E)=T−1(S−1(E))(S\circ T)^{-1}(E)=T^{-1}(S^{-1}(E)), so

(ν∘S−1)(E)=ν(S−1(E))=μ(T−1(S−1(E)))=μ((S∘T)−1(E))=(μ∘(S∘T)−1)(E).(\nu\circ S^{-1})(E)=\nu\bigl(S^{-1}(E)\bigr)=\mu\bigl(T^{-1}(S^{-1}(E))\bigr)=\mu\bigl((S\circ T)^{-1}(E)\bigr)=\bigl(\mu\circ(S\circ T)^{-1}\bigr)(E).

Both sides of (iv) are functions on H\mathcal{H} with the same values, hence equal.

The measure with a density. The function h1∅h\mathbf{1}_{\emptyset} is identically 00, so (hμ)(∅)=0(h\mu)(\emptyset)=0 (Basic Properties of the Integral of Nonnegative Measurable Maps (v)). Let (Am)(A_{m}) be a pairwise disjoint sequence in F\mathcal{F} and A=⋃mAmA=\bigcup_{m}A_{m}. For x∈Xx\in X,

∑m∈Nh(x)1Am(x)=h(x)1A(x):\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}h(x)\mathbf{1}_{A_{m}}(x)=h(x)\mathbf{1}_{A}(x):

if x∉Ax\notin A, every term is 00 (Small Facts about [0,∞]: Zero, Finiteness and Sums of Zeros (iv)); if x∈Akx\in A_{k}, then x∉Amx\notin A_{m} for m≠km\neq k, and the sum equals its kk-th term (Sums of Sequences in [0,∞]: Real Series, Linearity, Comparison, Rearrangement, Double Series and Monotone Convergence (vii), and Finite Sums: Vanishing Terms, Finite Additivity of Measures, and Finite Sums of Series in [0,∞] (iii) for the partial sum up to kk). By the series clause of linearity, Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (ii),

(hμ)(A)=∫Xh1A dμ=∫X∑m∈Nh1Am dμ=∑m∈N∫Xh1Am dμ=∑m∈N(hμ)(Am),(h\mu)(A)=\int_{X}h\mathbf{1}_{A}\,d\mu=\int_{X}\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}h\mathbf{1}_{A_{m}}\,d\mu=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}\int_{X}h\mathbf{1}_{A_{m}}\,d\mu=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}(h\mu)(A_{m}),

so hμh\mu is a measure (Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (i)). This proves (v).

Integrals against a density: simple functions. Let s∈S+(X,F)s\in\mathcal{S}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}), let C=s[X]C=s[X] and Ac=s−1({c})∈FA_{c}=s^{-1}(\{c\})\in\mathcal{F} for c∈Cc\in C. A point x∈Xx\in X lies in AcA_{c} exactly for c=s(x)c=s(x), so (Finite Sums: Vanishing Terms, Finite Additivity of Measures, and Finite Sums of Series in [0,∞] (iii) in [0,∞][0,\infty])

s(x)h(x)=∑c∈Cc h(x)1Ac(x)(x∈X).s(x)h(x)=\sum_{c\in C}c\,h(x)\mathbf{1}_{A_{c}}(x)\qquad(x\in X).

By Basic Properties of the Integral of Nonnegative Measurable Maps (iv), c h1Ac∈M+(X,F)c\,h\mathbf{1}_{A_{c}}\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}) with ∫Xc h1Ac dμ=c (hμ)(Ac)\int_{X}c\,h\mathbf{1}_{A_{c}}\,d\mu=c\,(h\mu)(A_{c}). The integral is additive over finite sums in M+(X,F)\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}) (from Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (i) by induction on the number of terms, Induction over Finite Sets, and Predicative Formulas for the Segments [n] and for Finiteness (iii), the empty sum being the zero function, with integral 00 by Basic Properties of the Integral of Nonnegative Measurable Maps (v)). With the definition of the simple integral for the measure hμh\mu (Simple Functions, Nonnegative Simple Functions, and the Simple Integral (iv)) and Basic Properties of the Integral of Nonnegative Measurable Maps (i), this gives

∫Xsh dμ=∑c∈Cc⋅(hμ)(Ac)=Ihμ(s)=∫Xs d(hμ).(2)\int_{X}sh\,d\mu=\sum_{c\in C}c\cdot(h\mu)(A_{c})=I_{h\mu}(s)=\int_{X}s\,d(h\mu).\tag{2}

Integrals against a density: nonnegative functions. Let f∈M+(X,F)f\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}). Then fh∈M+(X,F)fh\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}), and likewise sm(f)hs_{m}(f)h for m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} (Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (iii), Basic Properties of the Integral of Nonnegative Measurable Maps (i)). By Approximation of Measurable Functions by Dyadic Simple Functions (i), sm(f)∈S+(X,F)s_{m}(f)\in\mathcal{S}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}) and sm(f)(x)s_{m}(f)(x) increases in mm with supremum f(x)f(x); multiplying by h(x)h(x) preserves this (Arithmetic in [0,∞]: Monoid Laws, Distributivity, Monotonicity and Cancellation (iv), Suprema and Finite Sums in [0,∞] (ii), Arithmetic in [0,∞]: Monoid Laws, Distributivity, Monotonicity and Cancellation (ii)):

sm(f)(x)h(x)≤sm+1(f)(x)h(x),sup⁡msm(f)(x)h(x)=f(x)h(x)(x∈X).s_{m}(f)(x)h(x)\le s_{m+1}(f)(x)h(x),\qquad\sup_{m}s_{m}(f)(x)h(x)=f(x)h(x)\qquad(x\in X).

The monotone convergence theorem (Monotone Convergence Theorem (ii)) for hμh\mu and for μ\mu, together with (2), gives

∫Xf d(hμ)=sup⁡m∫Xsm(f) d(hμ)=sup⁡m∫Xsm(f)h dμ=∫Xfh dμ,\int_{X}f\,d(h\mu)=\sup_{m}\int_{X}s_{m}(f)\,d(h\mu)=\sup_{m}\int_{X}s_{m}(f)h\,d\mu=\int_{X}fh\,d\mu ,

which is (vi).

Integrals against a density: real functions. Let h(x)<∞h(x)<\infty for every x∈Xx\in X and let f:X→Rf:X\to\mathbb{R} be measurable. As a real function hh is measurable (Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (vii)), so fhfh is measurable (Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (i)). Since h(x)≥0h(x)\ge0,

(fh)+(x)=max⁡{f(x)h(x),0}=f+(x)h(x),(fh)−(x)=f−(x)h(x)(x∈X),(fh)^{+}(x)=\max\{f(x)h(x),0\}=f^{+}(x)h(x),\qquad(fh)^{-}(x)=f^{-}(x)h(x)\qquad(x\in X),

and these real products of nonnegative numbers are their products in [0,∞][0,\infty] (Addition and Multiplication on [0,∞] (ii)). As f+,f−∈M+(X,F)f^{+},f^{-}\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(X,\mathcal{F}) (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (iv)), (vi) gives

∫Xf± d(hμ)=∫Xf±h dμ=∫X(fh)± dμ.\int_{X}f^{\pm}\,d(h\mu)=\int_{X}f^{\pm}h\,d\mu=\int_{X}(fh)^{\pm}\,d\mu .

By these equalities, ∫Xf+ d(hμ)<∞\int_{X}f^{+}\,d(h\mu)<\infty if and only if ∫X(fh)+ dμ<∞\int_{X}(fh)^{+}\,d\mu<\infty, and ∫Xf− d(hμ)<∞\int_{X}f^{-}\,d(h\mu)<\infty if and only if ∫X(fh)− dμ<∞\int_{X}(fh)^{-}\,d\mu<\infty; this is the asserted equivalence (Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral (i)), and subtracting (Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral (iii)) gives

∫Xf d(hμ)=∫X(fh)+ dμ−∫X(fh)− dμ=∫Xfh dμ.\int_{X}f\,d(h\mu)=\int_{X}(fh)^{+}\,d\mu-\int_{X}(fh)^{-}\,d\mu=\int_{X}fh\,d\mu .

This proves (vii).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…