TheoremBase

Proof

Let ∣⋅∣|\cdot| be the absolute value, write ∂mf\partial_{m}f for ∂f/∂xm\partial f/\partial x_{m}, and for z∈Rnz\in\mathbb{R}^{n} write ∥z∥\lVert z\rVert for the Euclidean norm of zz, which by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n is the unique nonnegative real with ∥z∥2=∑i=1nzi2\lVert z\rVert^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}z_{i}^{2}, and which by claim 2 of that lemma is the Euclidean distance from zz to the origin. For z∈Rnz\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, an index mm and u∈Ru\in\mathbb{R}, write z[m:u]z[m{:}u] for the point whose mmth coordinate is uu and whose other coordinates are those of zz. Claim numbers refer to Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and to Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field as indicated.

As in earlier arguments we use that squares are strictly monotone on nonnegative reals: if 0≤α0\le\alpha, 0≤β0\le\beta and α<β\alpha<\beta, then 0<β0<\beta by claim 2, so βα<ββ\beta\alpha<\beta\beta by claim 10 and αα≤βα\alpha\alpha\le\beta\alpha, whence α2<β2\alpha^{2}<\beta^{2} by claim 2; consequently α≤β\alpha\le\beta whenever α2≤β2\alpha^{2}\le\beta^{2}. In particular ∣zi∣≤∥z∥|z_{i}|\le\lVert z\rVert for each ii, since zi2≤∥z∥2z_{i}^{2}\le\lVert z\rVert^{2} and ∣zi∣2=zi2|z_{i}|^{2}=z_{i}^{2} by claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field.

Step 1 (a ball inside UU). Since a∈Ua\in U and UU is open, there is rr with 0<r0<r such that every point of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} at Euclidean distance less than rr from aa lies in UU.

Step 2 (telescoping). Let h=(h1,…,hn)∈Rnh=(h_{1},\dots,h_{n})\in\mathbb{R}^{n} with ∥h∥<r\lVert h\rVert<r. Define points p0,…,pnp_{0},\dots,p_{n} by p0=ap_{0}=a and pm=pm−1[m:am+hm]p_{m}=p_{m-1}[m{:}a_{m}+h_{m}] for m∈{1,…,n}m\in\{1,\dots,n\}, so that pmp_{m} has llth coordinate al+hla_{l}+h_{l} for l≤ml\le m and ala_{l} for l>ml>m; in particular pn=a+hp_{n}=a+h.

More generally, for m∈{1,…,n}m\in\{1,\dots,n\} and uu between ama_{m} and am+hma_{m}+h_{m} inclusive, the point pm−1[m:u]p_{m-1}[m{:}u] differs from aa only in coordinates l≤ml\le m, by hlh_{l} for l<ml<m and by u−amu-a_{m} for l=ml=m, and ∣u−am∣≤∣hm∣|u-a_{m}|\le|h_{m}|; so the square of its distance to aa is at most ∑lhl2=∥h∥2\sum_{l}h_{l}^{2}=\lVert h\rVert^{2}, whence that distance is at most ∥h∥<r\lVert h\rVert<r and the point lies in UU. In particular every pmp_{m} lies in UU, and

f(a+h)−f(a)=∑m=1n(f(pm)−f(pm−1)).f(a+h)-f(a)=\sum_{m=1}^{n}\bigl(f(p_{m})-f(p_{m-1})\bigr).

Step 3 (a mean value point in each coordinate). Fix mm. If hm=0h_{m}=0 then pm=pm−1p_{m}=p_{m-1} and f(pm)−f(pm−1)=0=∂mf(qm)hmf(p_{m})-f(p_{m-1})=0=\partial_{m}f(q_{m})h_{m} with qm=pm−1q_{m}=p_{m-1}.

Suppose hm≠0h_{m}\ne0. Since ∥h∥<r\lVert h\rVert<r, claim 1 gives 0<r−∥h∥0<r-\lVert h\rVert, so by claim 8 the element ρ=(r−∥h∥)⋅2−1\rho=\bigl(r-\lVert h\rVert\bigr)\cdot2^{-1} satisfies 0<ρ0<\rho and ρ+ρ=r−∥h∥\rho+\rho=r-\lVert h\rVert, that is ∥h∥+ρ+ρ=r\lVert h\rVert+\rho+\rho=r; adding ∥h∥+ρ\lVert h\rVert+\rho to 0<ρ0<\rho gives ∥h∥+ρ<r\lVert h\rVert+\rho<r, again by claim 1. Let JJ be the open interval consisting of those uu with am−(∣hm∣+ρ)<ua_{m}-\bigl(|h_{m}|+\rho\bigr)<u and u<am+(∣hm∣+ρ)u<a_{m}+\bigl(|h_{m}|+\rho\bigr).

Let u∈Ju\in J. Adding −am-a_{m} to both inequalities, claim 1 gives −(∣hm∣+ρ)<u−am-\bigl(|h_{m}|+\rho\bigr)<u-a_{m} and u−am<∣hm∣+ρu-a_{m}<|h_{m}|+\rho, so ∣u−am∣<∣hm∣+ρ|u-a_{m}|<|h_{m}|+\rho by claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. The point pm−1[m:u]p_{m-1}[m{:}u] agrees with aa in the coordinates l>ml>m and differs from it by hlh_{l} in the coordinates l<ml<m and by u−amu-a_{m} in the coordinate mm; hence the square of its Euclidean distance to aa equals ∑l<mhl2+(u−am)2\sum_{l<m}h_{l}^{2}+(u-a_{m})^{2}. Here ∑l<mhl2≤∥h∥2−hm2\sum_{l<m}h_{l}^{2}\le\lVert h\rVert^{2}-h_{m}^{2}, since the omitted terms hl2h_{l}^{2} with l>ml>m are nonnegative, and (u−am)2=∣u−am∣2≤(∣hm∣+ρ)2(u-a_{m})^{2}=|u-a_{m}|^{2}\le\bigl(|h_{m}|+\rho\bigr)^{2} by claim 4 of that lemma and the monotonicity of squares. Moreover ∣hm∣ρ≤∥h∥ρ|h_{m}|\rho\le\lVert h\rVert\rho: this is claim 10 when ∣hm∣<∥h∥|h_{m}|<\lVert h\rVert, and an equality when ∣hm∣=∥h∥|h_{m}|=\lVert h\rVert. Using ∣hm∣2=hm2|h_{m}|^{2}=h_{m}^{2}, again by claim 4, we get

∑l<mhl2+(u−am)2≤∥h∥2−hm2+(∣hm∣+ρ)2=∥h∥2+∣hm∣ρ+∣hm∣ρ+ρ2≤(∥h∥+ρ)2.\sum_{l<m}h_{l}^{2}+(u-a_{m})^{2}\le\lVert h\rVert^{2}-h_{m}^{2}+\bigl(|h_{m}|+\rho\bigr)^{2}=\lVert h\rVert^{2}+|h_{m}|\rho+|h_{m}|\rho+\rho^{2}\le\bigl(\lVert h\rVert+\rho\bigr)^{2}.

By the monotonicity of squares the distance from pm−1[m:u]p_{m-1}[m{:}u] to aa is therefore at most ∥h∥+ρ\lVert h\rVert+\rho, hence less than rr; so pm−1[m:u]∈Up_{m-1}[m{:}u]\in U for every u∈Ju\in J.

Let G:J→RG:J\to\mathbb{R} be given by G(u)=f(pm−1[m:u])G(u)=f\bigl(p_{m-1}[m{:}u]\bigr). For each u0∈Ju_{0}\in J, apply Slice Function and the Partial Derivative to ff at the point pm−1[m:u0]p_{m-1}[m{:}u_{0}] of UU in the mmth variable: claim 1 of that lemma gives a positive radius ρ0\rho_{0}, and claim 2 identifies the slice function on the interval (u0−ρ0,u0+ρ0)(u_{0}-\rho_{0},u_{0}+\rho_{0}), which agrees with GG there, as differentiable at u0u_{0} with derivative ∂mf(pm−1[m:u0])\partial_{m}f\bigl(p_{m-1}[m{:}u_{0}]\bigr), the partial derivative existing because ff is of class C1C^{1}. By An Open Interval is an Interval All of Whose Points Are Interior both intervals have all points interior, so shrinking the δ\delta in the defining condition confines the increments to the overlap, where the two functions agree; hence GG is differentiable at u0u_{0} with G′(u0)=∂mf(pm−1[m:u0])G'(u_{0})=\partial_{m}f\bigl(p_{m-1}[m{:}u_{0}]\bigr).

Both ama_{m} and am+hma_{m}+h_{m} lie in JJ: indeed 0≤∣hm∣0\le|h_{m}| and 0<ρ0<\rho give 0<∣hm∣+ρ0<|h_{m}|+\rho and ∣hm∣<∣hm∣+ρ|h_{m}|<|h_{m}|+\rho by claim 1, so claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, applied to 00 and to hmh_{m} with c=∣hm∣+ρc=|h_{m}|+\rho, yields the two pairs of strict inequalities required. Applying Mean Value Theorem on an Open Interval to GG on JJ with these two points in increasing order yields ξm\xi_{m} strictly between them with G(am+hm)−G(am)=G′(ξm)hmG(a_{m}+h_{m})-G(a_{m})=G'(\xi_{m})h_{m}, that is, with qm=pm−1[m:ξm]q_{m}=p_{m-1}[m{:}\xi_{m}],

f(pm)−f(pm−1)=∂mf(qm) hm.f(p_{m})-f(p_{m-1})=\partial_{m}f(q_{m})\,h_{m}.

Since ∣ξm−am∣<∣hm∣|\xi_{m}-a_{m}|<|h_{m}|, Step 2 shows qmq_{m} is at distance at most ∥h∥\lVert h\rVert from aa.

Step 4 (the estimate). Combining Steps 2 and 3,

f(a+h)−f(a)−∑m=1n∂mf(a)hm=∑m=1n(∂mf(qm)−∂mf(a))hm.f(a+h)-f(a)-\sum_{m=1}^{n}\partial_{m}f(a)h_{m}=\sum_{m=1}^{n}\bigl(\partial_{m}f(q_{m})-\partial_{m}f(a)\bigr)h_{m}.

Let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} with 0<ε0<\varepsilon. Since n≥1n\ge1, the element nn, a sum of copies of 11, is positive by claims 6 and 3, so ε′=ε n−1\varepsilon'=\varepsilon\,n^{-1} is positive by claims 7 and 5. Each ∂mf\partial_{m}f is continuous at aa, by clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set; taking the least of the finitely many radii by repeated use of claim 9, there is θ\theta with 0<θ0<\theta such that every z∈Uz\in U at distance less than θ\theta from aa satisfies ∣∂mf(z)−∂mf(a)∣<ε′|\partial_{m}f(z)-\partial_{m}f(a)|<\varepsilon' for every mm.

Let δ\delta be the least, by claim 9, of rr and θ\theta, so 0<δ0<\delta. Suppose h∈Rnh\in\mathbb{R}^{n} satisfies 0<∥h∥<δ0<\lVert h\rVert<\delta. Then ∥h∥<r\lVert h\rVert<r, so a+h∈Ua+h\in U by Step 1 and Steps 2 and 3 apply, and each qmq_{m} is at distance at most ∥h∥<θ\lVert h\rVert<\theta from aa, so ∣∂mf(qm)−∂mf(a)∣<ε′|\partial_{m}f(q_{m})-\partial_{m}f(a)|<\varepsilon'.

Writing cm=∂mf(qm)−∂mf(a)c_{m}=\partial_{m}f(q_{m})-\partial_{m}f(a) and using claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field repeatedly, then claim 4 of that lemma and claim 10 together with ∣hm∣≤∥h∥|h_{m}|\le\lVert h\rVert,

∣∑m=1ncmhm∣≤∑m=1n∣cm∣ ∣hm∣≤∑m=1nε′∥h∥=n ε′∥h∥=ε ∥h∥.\Bigl|\sum_{m=1}^{n}c_{m}h_{m}\Bigr|\le\sum_{m=1}^{n}|c_{m}|\,|h_{m}|\le\sum_{m=1}^{n}\varepsilon'\lVert h\rVert=n\,\varepsilon'\lVert h\rVert=\varepsilon\,\lVert h\rVert .

Combining this with the identity displayed at the start of Step 4,

∣f(a+h)−f(a)−∑m=1n∂mf(a)hm∣≤ε ∥h∥.\Bigl|f(a+h)-f(a)-\sum_{m=1}^{n}\partial_{m}f(a)h_{m}\Bigr|\le\varepsilon\,\lVert h\rVert .

Step 5 (reading the estimate as differentiability). Since ff is of class C1C^{1} on UU, every partial derivative ∂mf(a)\partial_{m}f(a) exists, so the Jacobian matrix Df(a)Df(a) is defined; it has one row and nn columns, with entry ∂mf(a)\partial_{m}f(a) in column mm. By Matrix-Vector Product the single coordinate of the point Df(a) hDf(a)\,h of R1\mathbb{R}^{1} is therefore ∑m=1n∂mf(a)hm\sum_{m=1}^{n}\partial_{m}f(a)h_{m}, so the single coordinate of f(a+h)−f(a)−Df(a)hf(a+h)-f(a)-Df(a)h, computed by Difference, Dot Product, and Orthogonality in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, is the quantity inside the absolute value above. Moreover, for a point zz of R1\mathbb{R}^{1} with single coordinate tt, claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n characterises ∥z∥\lVert z\rVert as the unique nonnegative real whose square is t2t^{2}, while ∣t∣|t| is nonnegative with ∣t∣2=t2|t|^{2}=t^{2} by claims 1 and 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field; hence ∥z∥=∣t∣\lVert z\rVert=|t|. The displayed inequality therefore reads

∥f(a+h)−f(a)−Df(a) h∥≤ε ∥h∥.\bigl\lVert f(a+h)-f(a)-Df(a)\,h\bigr\rVert\le\varepsilon\,\lVert h\rVert .

Thus for every real ε\varepsilon with 0<ε0<\varepsilon there is a real δ\delta with 0<δ0<\delta such that every h∈Rnh\in\mathbb{R}^{n} with 0<∥h∥<δ0<\lVert h\rVert<\delta satisfies a+h∈Ua+h\in U and the displayed inequality. By Differentiability at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces this says exactly that ff, regarded as a map into R1\mathbb{R}^{1} with single coordinate function ff, is differentiable at aa with derivative matrix Df(a)Df(a).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…