TheoremBase

Proof of The Standard Normal Distribution Has Finite Fisher Information, Score Minus the Identity, and Fisher Information One

lemmalem:standard-normal-score-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 11,222 chars · 39 deps · depth 30 Reason: Batch C: proof that the standard normal has score minus the identity and Fisher information one.

The density is the Gaussian smoothing weight of the published smoothing lemma in dimension one with unit parameter, whose normalization constant is the reciprocal of the standard-normal constant; that lemma gives measurability, the partial derivative -x times the weight, sequential continuity of both, and the second moment one. Sequential continuity passes to continuity in the Euclidean sense, so the density is of class C1C^1, and the density lemma for the score, with the vector field -id lying in the tangent space, identifies the score and the Fisher information.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. The identifications of One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative are in force: R=R1\mathbb{R}=\mathbb{R}^{1}, a point of R1\mathbb{R}^{1} being its sole coordinate, B(R1)=B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{1})=\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}), so that λ=λ1\lambda=\lambda_{1} is a measure on B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) and NP(R)N\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}), and az=aza\cdot z=az and z2=z2\lVert z\rVert^{2}=z^{2} for a,zRa,z\in\mathbb{R} (One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §scalars). Field arithmetic in R\mathbb{R} is that of Field, a quotient s/ts/t for t0t\ne0 meaning st1s\,t^{-1}, and 2=1+12=1+1. dRd_{\mathbb{R}} is the absolute-value metric on R\mathbb{R}, and the Euclidean distance dEd_{E} of R1\mathbb{R}^{1} is dRd_{\mathbb{R}} by The Euclidean Distance on the Real Line is the Absolute Value Metric. Convergence of a sequence of real numbers is that of Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers, read as stipulated in the preamble of Convergence and the Cauchy Condition for Real Sequences Agree with Those in the Real Line as a Metric Space, and convergence in a metric space is that of Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space. A nonnegative Borel function RR\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} is read as a [0,][0,\infty]-valued map where such a map is required, the two readings of measurability agreeing by Lebesgue Integral of a Nonnegative Measurable Function. R1\mathbb{R}^{1} is open by claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous.

Throughout, The Gaussian Smoothing Weight: Normalization, Derivatives, Exponential Tilting, Moments, and First-Order Remainder is applied in dimension 11 with smoothing parameter 11 (in the role of its mm and its η\eta, and 0<110<1\le1), and ψ1\psi_{1}, c1c_{1} and φ1=c1ψ1\varphi_{1}=c_{1}\psi_{1} denote the objects of that lemma. For zR1z\in\mathbb{R}^{1}, ψ1(z)=exp(z2/(21))=exp(z2/2)=g(z)\psi_{1}(z)=\exp\bigl(-\lVert z\rVert^{2}/(2\cdot1)\bigr)=\exp(-z^{2}/2)=g(z), so ψ1=g\psi_{1}=g; and c1c_{1} is the unique real number c1>0c_{1}>0 with Rc1gdλ=1\int_{\mathbb{R}}c_{1}g\,d\lambda=1 (claim 1 there, λ1\lambda_{1} being λ\lambda by Lebesgue Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n).

Step 1: φ=φ1\varphi=\varphi_{1}. Since c>0c>0, the inverse c1c^{-1} exists and c1>0c^{-1}>0 by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. By claim 1 of The Gaussian Smoothing Weight: Normalization, Derivatives, Exponential Tilting, Moments, and First-Order Remainder, g=ψ1g=\psi_{1} is measurable with respect to B(R1)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{1}) and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) and 0<g(z)0<g(z) for every zz, so by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, Rc1gdλ=c1Rgdλ=c1c=1\int_{\mathbb{R}}c^{-1}g\,d\lambda=c^{-1}\int_{\mathbb{R}}g\,d\lambda=c^{-1}c=1. By the uniqueness of c1c_{1}, c1=c1c_{1}=c^{-1}, and therefore φ1=c1g=φ\varphi_{1}=c^{-1}g=\varphi.

Step 2: claim 1. By claim 1 of The Gaussian Smoothing Weight: Normalization, Derivatives, Exponential Tilting, Moments, and First-Order Remainder, φ=φ1\varphi=\varphi_{1} is measurable with respect to B(R1)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{1}) and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}), that is, Borel in the sense of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps, it is sequentially continuous, and 0<φ(z)0<\varphi(z) for every zz. By claim 2 there, applied with i=1i=1, the partial derivative 1φ(z)\partial_{1}\varphi(z) exists at every zR1z\in\mathbb{R}^{1}, with 1φ(z)=z11φ(z)=zφ(z)\partial_{1}\varphi(z)=-\frac{z_{1}}{1}\varphi(z)=-z\,\varphi(z), and 1φ\partial_{1}\varphi is sequentially continuous.

Sequential continuity implies continuity in the Euclidean sense. Let h:R1Rh:\mathbb{R}^{1}\to\mathbb{R} be sequentially continuous in the sense of The Gaussian Smoothing Weight: Normalization, Derivatives, Exponential Tilting, Moments, and First-Order Remainder: h(zk)h(z)h(z^{k})\to h(z) as a sequence of real numbers whenever (zk)kN(z^{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} is a sequence in R1\mathbb{R}^{1} and zR1z\in\mathbb{R}^{1} with dE(zk,z)0d_{E}(z^{k},z)\to0 as a sequence of real numbers. Let zR1z\in\mathbb{R}^{1} and let (zk)kN(z^{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} converge to zz in the metric space (R1,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{1},d_{E}): for every real ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is NNN\in\mathbb{N} with dE(zk,z)<εd_{E}(z^{k},z)<\varepsilon for every kNk\in\mathbb{N} with kNk\ge N. Since 0dE(zk,z)0\le d_{E}(z^{k},z) (Euclidean Distance is a Metric on Rn\mathbb{R}^n) we have dE(zk,z)0=dE(zk,z)|d_{E}(z^{k},z)-0|=d_{E}(z^{k},z) by Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, so the same condition says that the real sequence (dE(zk,z))k(d_{E}(z^{k},z))_{k} converges to 00 in the metric space (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), hence converges to 00 as a sequence of real numbers by claim 1 of Convergence and the Cauchy Condition for Real Sequences Agree with Those in the Real Line as a Metric Space. By sequential continuity, h(zk)h(z)h(z^{k})\to h(z) as a sequence of real numbers, hence in (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) by claim 1 of Convergence and the Cauchy Condition for Real Sequences Agree with Those in the Real Line as a Metric Space again. By Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §criterion, applied with X=A=R1X=A=\mathbb{R}^{1} (with dEd_{E}) and Y=(R,dR)Y=(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), hh is continuous at zz relative to R1\mathbb{R}^{1} as a map into (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}); and by claim 1 of Euclidean Continuity Agrees with Metric Continuity for Real-Valued Functions, applied with n=1n=1 and E=R1E=\mathbb{R}^{1}, hh is continuous at zz in the sense of Continuity at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces.

Applying this to h=φh=\varphi and to h=1φh=\partial_{1}\varphi, both are continuous at every point of R1\mathbb{R}^{1} in the sense of Continuity at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces; since R1\mathbb{R}^{1} is open (claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous), clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, read through its clause 3, shows that φ\varphi is of class C1C^{1} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1}. By claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, φ\varphi is continuous in the sense of the preamble of One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative, and it is Borel as recorded above. By claim 2 of One-Dimensional Derivatives, Partial Derivatives, and Smoothness on the Real Line, φ\varphi is differentiable at every xRx\in\mathbb{R} with φ(x)=1φ(x)=xφ(x)\varphi'(x)=\partial_{1}\varphi(x)=-x\,\varphi(x).

The density. Let BB(R)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}). By Standard Normal Distribution and claim 2 of The Gaussian Weight Defines a Probability Distribution, N(B)=c1R1BgdλN(B)=c^{-1}\int_{\mathbb{R}}\mathbf{1}_{B}\,g\,d\lambda, the integral of the nonnegative function 1Bg\mathbf{1}_{B}\,g, which is measurable by The Gaussian Weight Defines a Probability Distribution. By claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, with the constant c1[0,)c^{-1}\in[0,\infty), c1R1Bgdλ=Rc11Bgdλc^{-1}\int_{\mathbb{R}}\mathbf{1}_{B}\,g\,d\lambda=\int_{\mathbb{R}}c^{-1}\,\mathbf{1}_{B}\,g\,d\lambda, and c1(1B(x)g(x))=1B(x)(c1g(x))=1B(x)φ(x)c^{-1}\bigl(\mathbf{1}_{B}(x)\,g(x)\bigr)=\mathbf{1}_{B}(x)\bigl(c^{-1}g(x)\bigr)=\mathbf{1}_{B}(x)\,\varphi(x) for every xx by associativity and commutativity of multiplication. Hence N(B)=R1BφdλN(B)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\mathbf{1}_{B}\,\varphi\,d\lambda, which is νφ(B)\nu_{\varphi}(B) for the measure νφ\nu_{\varphi} with density φ\varphi with respect to λ\lambda of claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, applied on (R,B(R),λ)(\mathbb{R},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}),\lambda) with h=φh=\varphi, a Borel function with values in [0,)[0,\infty). So N=νφN=\nu_{\varphi}.

Step 3: claim 2. By The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment, M2(N)=Rx2N(dx)=Rx2N(dx)M_{2}(N)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\,N(dx)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}x^{2}\,N(dx), the integral of the nonnegative Borel function xx2=x2x\mapsto\lVert x\rVert^{2}=x^{2} (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pairs), and by claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables and Step 2 this equals Rx2φ(x)λ(dx)\int_{\mathbb{R}}x^{2}\varphi(x)\,\lambda(dx) in [0,][0,\infty]. Apply claim 4 of The Gaussian Smoothing Weight: Normalization, Derivatives, Exponential Tilting, Moments, and First-Order Remainder with a=1R1a=1\in\mathbb{R}^{1} (and smoothing parameter 11): there Za(z)=(az)/1=(1z)/1=zZ_{a}(z)=(a\cdot z)/1=(1\cdot z)/1=z and κa=a2/1=12/1=1\kappa_{a}=\lVert a\rVert^{2}/1=1^{2}/1=1, so the function Za2φ1:zz2φ(z)Z_{a}^{2}\varphi_{1}:z\mapsto z^{2}\varphi(z) is integrable with respect to λ\lambda, with Lebesgue integral Rz2φ(z)λ(dz)=κa=1\int_{\mathbb{R}}z^{2}\varphi(z)\,\lambda(dz)=\kappa_{a}=1 in the sense of Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral. This function is nonnegative: 0<φ(z)0<\varphi(z) (Step 2), hence 0φ(z)0\le\varphi(z), and 0z20\le z^{2} by claim 2 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field, so φ(z)0φ(z)z2\varphi(z)\cdot0\le\varphi(z)z^{2} by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and φ(z)0=0\varphi(z)\cdot0=0 by claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field. Hence its positive part is the function itself and its negative part is the zero function, which is the nonnegative simple function 1\mathbf{1}_{\varnothing}, whose integral is λ()=0\lambda(\varnothing)=0 by The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set and Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure; so by Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral its Lebesgue integral equals its integral as a nonnegative function, and M2(N)=1M_{2}(N)=1. In particular M2(N)<M_{2}(N)<\infty, so NP2(R)N\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) by The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space.

Step 4: claim 3. Apply The Score of a Measure with a Positive Continuously Differentiable Density with d=1d=1, with the density φ\varphi in the role of its mm, and with μ=N\mu=N: by Steps 2 and 3, φ\varphi is of class C1C^{1} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1} with φ(x)>0\varphi(x)>0 for every xx, and NP2(R)N\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) is the measure with density φ\varphi with respect to λ1=λ\lambda_{1}=\lambda. Its gradient map is φ(x)=Dφ(x)\nabla\varphi(x)=D\varphi(x), the point of R1\mathbb{R}^{1} with single coordinate 1φ(x)=xφ(x)\partial_{1}\varphi(x)=-x\,\varphi(x) (Gradient of a Real-Valued Function on a Euclidean Open Set), so the vector field of that lemma, written η\eta there and ζ\zeta here, is ζ(x)=φ(x)1φ(x)\zeta(x)=\varphi(x)^{-1}\nabla\varphi(x), the scalar multiple in R1\mathbb{R}^{1} being formed on the single coordinate (Scalar Multiple of a Point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n): ζ(x)=φ(x)1((xφ(x)))=(φ(x)1φ(x)x)=x\zeta(x)=\varphi(x)^{-1}\bigl(-(x\,\varphi(x))\bigr)=-\bigl(\varphi(x)^{-1}\varphi(x)\,x\bigr)=-x by claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field and the field axioms. Thus ζ(x)=x=(1)x\zeta(x)=-x=(-1)x for every xx, since (1)x=(1x)=x(-1)x=-(1x)=-x by claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field. The remaining hypothesis of the lemma holds: ζ(x)2=(x)2=x2\lVert\zeta(x)\rVert^{2}=(-x)^{2}=x^{2} by One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §scalars and claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field, so Rζ2dN=M2(N)=1<\int_{\mathbb{R}}\lVert\zeta\rVert^{2}\,dN=M_{2}(N)=1<\infty by Step 3. By The Score of a Measure with a Positive Continuously Differentiable Density §projection, NN has finite Fisher information, so NP2I(R)N\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{R}). The class of ζ\zeta belongs to L2(N;R)L^{2}(N;\mathbb{R}) by The Score of a Measure with a Positive Continuously Differentiable Density §identity; its representative is x(1)xx\mapsto(-1)x, so it is the scalar multiple (1)id(-1)\mathrm{id} of the class of id\mathrm{id}, scalar multiples of classes being formed on representatives (The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §classes), and (1)id=id(-1)\mathrm{id}=-\mathrm{id} by claim 5 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space. Since idTN\mathrm{id}\in T_{N} by Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §identity and TNT_{N} is a closed linear subspace of L2(N;R)L^{2}(N;\mathbb{R}) by Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §closed, hence a linear subspace by Real Hilbert Space §closed-subspace, clause 3 of Linear Subspace gives ζ=idTN\zeta=-\mathrm{id}\in T_{N}. By The Score of a Measure with a Positive Continuously Differentiable Density §equality, ξN=ζ=id\xi_{N}=\zeta=-\mathrm{id} and I(N)=ζN2=Rζ2dN=1\mathcal{I}(N)=\lVert\zeta\rVert_{N}^{2}=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\lVert\zeta\rVert^{2}\,dN=1, the last two equalities by One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §scalars and Step 3.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…