TheoremBase

If the two numbers differed, half their distance would serve as epsilon; a point of the interval close enough to x, which exists by the approach property, would give a difference quotient within epsilon of both, contradicting the triangle inequality.

Proof

Suppose, for a contradiction, that Lβ‰ ML\neq M. Then Lβˆ’Mβ‰ 0L-M\neq0, so 0<∣Lβˆ’M∣0<|L-M| by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (x). Put Ξ΅=∣Lβˆ’M∣/(1+1)\varepsilon=|L-M|/(1+1). Then 0<Ξ΅0<\varepsilon, by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (ix) applied to 0<∣Lβˆ’M∣0<|L-M|, and Ξ΅+Ξ΅=∣Lβˆ’M∣\varepsilon+\varepsilon=|L-M|.

The choices are made in this order. First, the hypothesis for N=LN=L, applied to this Ξ΅\varepsilon, gives a real Ξ΄L>0\delta_{L}>0 such that every t∈It\in I with 0<∣tβˆ’x∣<Ξ΄L0<|t-x|<\delta_{L} satisfies ∣q(t)βˆ’L∣<Ξ΅|q(t)-L|<\varepsilon, where q(t)=(f(t)βˆ’f(x))/(tβˆ’x)q(t)=(f(t)-f(x))/(t-x). Second, the hypothesis for N=MN=M, applied to the same Ξ΅\varepsilon, gives a real Ξ΄M>0\delta_{M}>0 such that every t∈It\in I with 0<∣tβˆ’x∣<Ξ΄M0<|t-x|<\delta_{M} satisfies ∣q(t)βˆ’M∣<Ξ΅|q(t)-M|<\varepsilon. Third, let Ξ΄=min⁑{Ξ΄L,Ξ΄M}\delta=\min\{\delta_{L},\delta_{M}\}, a real number with 0<Ξ΄0<\delta, δ≀δL\delta\le\delta_{L} and δ≀δM\delta\le\delta_{M}. Fourth, II is an interval containing two distinct points, so Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (vii), applied to II, xx and Ξ΄\delta, gives t∈It\in I with 0<∣tβˆ’x∣<Ξ΄0<|t-x|<\delta.

For this tt we have ∣tβˆ’x∣<Ξ΄L|t-x|<\delta_{L} and ∣tβˆ’x∣<Ξ΄M|t-x|<\delta_{M}, so ∣q(t)βˆ’L∣<Ξ΅|q(t)-L|<\varepsilon and ∣q(t)βˆ’M∣<Ξ΅|q(t)-M|<\varepsilon. Since Lβˆ’q(t)=βˆ’(q(t)βˆ’L)L-q(t)=-(q(t)-L), we have ∣Lβˆ’q(t)∣=∣q(t)βˆ’L∣|L-q(t)|=|q(t)-L| by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (x). As Lβˆ’M=(Lβˆ’q(t))+(q(t)βˆ’M)L-M=(L-q(t))+(q(t)-M), the triangle inequality Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (xi) gives

∣Lβˆ’Mβˆ£β‰€βˆ£Lβˆ’q(t)∣+∣q(t)βˆ’M∣.|L-M|\le|L-q(t)|+|q(t)-M| .

Adding the two strict inequalities, by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (iv) applied twice,

∣Lβˆ’q(t)∣+∣q(t)βˆ’M∣<Ξ΅+∣q(t)βˆ’M∣<Ξ΅+Ξ΅=∣Lβˆ’M∣.|L-q(t)|+|q(t)-M|<\varepsilon+|q(t)-M|<\varepsilon+\varepsilon=|L-M| .

Hence ∣Lβˆ’M∣<∣Lβˆ’M∣|L-M|<|L-M|, which is impossible, since << is the strict relation of the order on R\mathbb{R}. Therefore L=ML=M, which is (i).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…