Write ι = ι R \iota=\iota_{\mathbb{R}} ι = ι R ā for the canonical map of R \mathbb{R} R and S S S for the successor map of Natural Numbers .
Step 1 (a bound valid for t ā„ 1 t\ge 1 t ā„ 1 ). By claim 2 of Growth Bound for a Polynomial Function on the Real Line there are N ā N N\in\mathbb{N} N ā N and C ā R C\in\mathbb{R} C ā R with 0 ⤠C 0\le C 0 ⤠C such that ⣠p ( t ) ⣠⤠C ā t N |p(t)|\le C\,t^{N} ⣠p ( t ) ⣠⤠C t N for every t ā R t\in\mathbb{R} t ā R with 1 ⤠t 1\le t 1 ⤠t , where the powers are the natural number powers of R \mathbb{R} R . Put μ = ι ( S ( N ) ) \mu=\iota(S(N)) μ = ι ( S ( N )) and D = C ā μ S ( N ) D=C\,\mu^{S(N)} D = C μ S ( N ) ; by The Exponential Function Dominates Every Power we have 0 < μ 0<\mu 0 < μ , hence 0 ⤠μ S ( N ) 0\le\mu^{S(N)} 0 ⤠μ S ( N ) by claim 5 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field and therefore 0 ⤠D 0\le D 0 ⤠D by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field .
Let t ā R t\in\mathbb{R} t ā R with 1 ⤠t 1\le t 1 ⤠t . Then 0 < 1 ⤠t 0<1\le t 0 < 1 ⤠t by claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 2 of that lemma, so 0 < t 0<t 0 < t and t ā 1 t^{-1} t ā 1 exists with 0 < t ā 1 0<t^{-1} 0 < t ā 1 by claim 7 of that lemma. By claim 2 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function we have 0 < exp ā” ( ā t ) 0<\exp(-t) 0 < exp ( ā t ) , so multiplying ⣠p ( t ) ⣠⤠C ā t N |p(t)|\le C\,t^{N} ⣠p ( t ) ⣠⤠C t N by exp ā” ( ā t ) \exp(-t) exp ( ā t ) using claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives
⣠p ( t ) ⣠exp ā” ( ā t ) ⤠C ā t N exp ā” ( ā t ) . |p(t)|\exp(-t)\le C\,t^{N}\exp(-t). ⣠p ( t ) ⣠exp ( ā t ) ⤠C t N exp ( ā t ) .
By The Exponential Function Dominates Every Power , t N exp ā” ( ā t ) ⤠μ S ( N ) t ā 1 t^{N}\exp(-t)\le\mu^{S(N)}t^{-1} t N exp ( ā t ) ⤠μ S ( N ) t ā 1 ; multiplying by the nonnegative element C C C , again by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , and using associativity of multiplication,
C ā t N exp ā” ( ā t ) ⤠C ā μ S ( N ) t ā 1 = D ā t ā 1 . C\,t^{N}\exp(-t)\le C\,\mu^{S(N)}t^{-1}=D\,t^{-1}. C t N exp ( ā t ) ⤠C μ S ( N ) t ā 1 = D t ā 1 .
By transitivity of the order of the ordered field R \mathbb{R} R ,
⣠p ( t ) ⣠exp ā” ( ā t ) ⤠D ā t ā 1 wheneverĀ 1 ⤠t . |p(t)|\exp(-t)\le D\,t^{-1}\qquad\text{whenever }1\le t. ⣠p ( t ) ⣠exp ( ā t ) ⤠D t ā 1 wheneverĀ 1 ⤠t .
Step 2 (claim 1). Let ε ā R \varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} ε ā R with 0 < ε 0<\varepsilon 0 < ε . Then ε ā 1 \varepsilon^{-1} ε ā 1 exists and 0 < ε ā 1 0<\varepsilon^{-1} 0 < ε ā 1 by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , so 0 ⤠D ε ā 1 0\le D\varepsilon^{-1} 0 ⤠D ε ā 1 by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field . Put M = 1 + D ε ā 1 M=1+D\varepsilon^{-1} M = 1 + D ε ā 1 . Adding 1 1 1 to 0 ⤠D ε ā 1 0\le D\varepsilon^{-1} 0 ⤠D ε ā 1 gives 1 ⤠M 1\le M 1 ⤠M , and adding D ε ā 1 D\varepsilon^{-1} D ε ā 1 to 0 < 1 0<1 0 < 1 gives D ε ā 1 < M D\varepsilon^{-1}<M D ε ā 1 < M , both by claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field together with the trivial case of equality.
Let t ā R t\in\mathbb{R} t ā R with M ⤠t M\le t M ⤠t . Then 1 ⤠t 1\le t 1 ⤠t by transitivity, and D ε ā 1 < t D\varepsilon^{-1}<t D ε ā 1 < t by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field . Since 0 < t 0<t 0 < t , as in Step 1, and 0 < ε t ā 1 0<\varepsilon t^{-1} 0 < ε t ā 1 by claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , multiplying the strict inequality D ε ā 1 < t D\varepsilon^{-1}<t D ε ā 1 < t by ε t ā 1 \varepsilon t^{-1} ε t ā 1 using claim 10 of that lemma gives
D ā ε ā 1 ε ā t ā 1 < t ā ε ā t ā 1 , thatĀ is, D ā t ā 1 < ε , D\,\varepsilon^{-1}\varepsilon\,t^{-1}<t\,\varepsilon\,t^{-1},\qquad\text{that is,}\qquad D\,t^{-1}<\varepsilon , D ε ā 1 ε t ā 1 < t ε t ā 1 , thatĀ is, D t ā 1 < ε ,
by commutativity and associativity of multiplication and ε ā 1 ε = 1 = t ā t ā 1 \varepsilon^{-1}\varepsilon=1=t\,t^{-1} ε ā 1 ε = 1 = t t ā 1 . Combining with the bound of Step 1 and claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ,
⣠p ( t ) ⣠exp ā” ( ā t ) ⤠D ā t ā 1 < ε , |p(t)|\exp(-t)\le D\,t^{-1}<\varepsilon , ⣠p ( t ) ⣠exp ( ā t ) ⤠D t ā 1 < ε ,
which proves claim 1.
Step 3 (claim 2). Let ε ā R \varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} ε ā R with 0 < ε 0<\varepsilon 0 < ε and let M M M be as in claim 1, so 1 ⤠M 1\le M 1 ⤠M and hence 0 < M 0<M 0 < M by claim 6 and claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field . Put Ī“ = M ā 1 \delta=M^{-1} Ī“ = M ā 1 ; then 0 < Ī“ 0<\delta 0 < Ī“ by claim 7 of that lemma.
Let s ā R s\in\mathbb{R} s ā R with 0 < s < Ī“ 0<s<\delta 0 < s < Ī“ . Then s ā 1 s^{-1} s ā 1 exists and 0 < s ā 1 0<s^{-1} 0 < s ā 1 by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , and 0 < M s ā 1 0<Ms^{-1} 0 < M s ā 1 by claim 5 of that lemma. Multiplying the strict inequality s < M ā 1 s<M^{-1} s < M ā 1 by M s ā 1 Ms^{-1} M s ā 1 using claim 10 of that lemma gives
s ā M ā s ā 1 < M ā 1 M ā s ā 1 , thatĀ is, M < s ā 1 , s\,M\,s^{-1}<M^{-1}M\,s^{-1},\qquad\text{that is,}\qquad M<s^{-1}, s M s ā 1 < M ā 1 M s ā 1 , thatĀ is, M < s ā 1 ,
by commutativity and associativity of multiplication and s ā s ā 1 = 1 = M ā 1 M s\,s^{-1}=1=M^{-1}M s s ā 1 = 1 = M ā 1 M . In particular M ⤠s ā 1 M\le s^{-1} M ⤠s ā 1 , so claim 1 applied to t = s ā 1 t=s^{-1} t = s ā 1 gives
⣠p ( s ā 1 ) ⣠exp ā” ( ā s ā 1 ) < ε , \bigl|p\bigl(s^{-1}\bigr)\bigr|\exp\bigl(-s^{-1}\bigr)<\varepsilon , ā p ( s ā 1 ) ā exp ( ā s ā 1 ) < ε ,
which proves claim 2.