TheoremBase

Scaling follows from the change of variables z -> z/sqrt(s) in the normalisation integral; smoothness and the derivative formulas from the product rule applied to polynomial multiples of the Gaussian; the bounds from the elementary inequality umu^m exp(-u^2/4) <= DmD_m; the convolution identity from completing the square; and the moments and tails from the moment identities of the smoothing weight and Markov's inequality.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, ss satisfies 0<s≤10<s\le1, and we write ψs(z)=exp⁡(−∥z∥2/(2s))\psi_{s}(z)=\exp(-\lVert z\rVert^{2}/(2s)), so that gs=csψsg_{s}=c_{s}\psi_{s}, with ∫Rqψs dλq=1/cs\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\psi_{s}\,d\lambda_{q}=1/c_{s} by claim 1 of The Gaussian Smoothing Weight: Normalization, Derivatives, Exponential Tilting, Moments, and First-Order Remainder (read in dimension m=qm=q with η=s\eta=s) and the homogeneity in claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion with the nonnegative factor 1/cs1/c_{s}; that claim also gives 0<ψs≤10<\psi_{s}\le1, hence 0<gs≤cs0<g_{s}\le c_{s}, the evenness gs(−z)=gs(z)g_{s}(-z)=g_{s}(z), and, for every a∈Rqa\in\mathbb{R}^{q}, that z↦gs(z−a)z\mapsto g_{s}(z-a) is Borel with ∫Rqgs(z−a) dz=1\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}g_{s}(z-a)\,dz=1. By that lemma ψs\psi_{s} and gsg_{s} are sequentially continuous, hence continuous on Rq\mathbb{R}^{q} by Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity, hence Borel (Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets, preamble). Powers (s)m(\sqrt{s})^{m} obey (s)m(s)n=(s)m+n(\sqrt{s})^{m}(\sqrt{s})^{n}=(\sqrt{s})^{m+n} (claim 1 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities, real and natural powers agreeing) and (s)2=ss=s(\sqrt{s})^{2}=\sqrt{s}\sqrt{s}=s (claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field and Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root), so that s−m/2s−n/2=s−(m+n)/2s^{-m/2}s^{-n/2}=s^{-(m+n)/2} and s−2/2=s−1s^{-2/2}=s^{-1}; and ab=ab\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}=\sqrt{ab} for nonnegative a,ba,b by claim 5 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities. The exponential satisfies exp⁡(u+v)=exp⁡(u)exp⁡(v)\exp(u+v)=\exp(u)\exp(v), exp⁡(u)>0\exp(u)>0, and exp⁡(u)≥1+u\exp(u)\ge1+u for u≥0u\ge0 (claims 1, 2 and 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function); in particular, for u≥0u\ge0, exp⁡(u)≥1\exp(u)\ge1 and exp⁡(−u)=1/exp⁡(u)≤1\exp(-u)=1/\exp(u)\le1 (the inverse of a number ≥1\ge1 is ≤1\le1, by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field applied to 1≤exp⁡(u)1\le\exp(u) with the nonnegative multiplier 1/exp⁡(u)1/\exp(u), claim 4 there).

Claim 1 (scaling). Let c=s−1/2c=s^{-1/2}. For z∈Rqz\in\mathbb{R}^{q}, ∥cz∥2=c2∥z∥2=s−1∥z∥2\lVert cz\rVert^{2}=c^{2}\lVert z\rVert^{2}=s^{-1}\lVert z\rVert^{2} by claim 5 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square, so ψ1(cz)=exp⁡(−∥z∥2/(2s))=ψs(z)\psi_{1}(cz)=\exp(-\lVert z\rVert^{2}/(2s))=\psi_{s}(z). By claim 2 of Scaling Lebesgue Measure on ℝⁿ by a Diagonal Matrix, applied to the nonnegative Borel function ψ1\psi_{1},

1cs=∫Rqψs dλq=∫Rqψ1(cz) dz=∣c∣−q∫Rqψ1 dλq=(s)qc1,\frac{1}{c_{s}}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\psi_{s}\,d\lambda_{q}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\psi_{1}(cz)\,dz=|c|^{-q}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\psi_{1}\,d\lambda_{q}=\frac{(\sqrt{s})^{q}}{c_{1}},

since ∣c∣q=(s−1/2)q|c|^{q}=(s^{-1/2})^{q} is the inverse of (s)q(\sqrt{s})^{q}. Hence cs=c1 s−q/2c_{s}=c_{1}\,s^{-q/2}, and gs(z)=csψs(z)=s−q/2 c1ψ1(s−1/2z)=s−q/2g1(s−1/2z)g_{s}(z)=c_{s}\psi_{s}(z)=s^{-q/2}\,c_{1}\psi_{1}(s^{-1/2}z)=s^{-q/2}g_{1}(s^{-1/2}z).

Claim 2 (smoothness and derivatives). Let C\mathcal{C} be the set of functions F:Rq→RF:\mathbb{R}^{q}\to\mathbb{R} of the form F=h gsF=h\,g_{s} (pointwise product) with h:Rq→Rh:\mathbb{R}^{q}\to\mathbb{R} smooth on Rq\mathbb{R}^{q}. Every F∈CF\in\mathcal{C} is continuous, as a product of continuous functions (claim 5 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space; a smooth hh is of class C1C^{1}, hence continuous, by Smooth Functions on an Open Subset of ℝⁿ and clause 1 of Functions of Class Cᵏ on an Open Subset of ℝⁿ). By claim 2 of The Gaussian Smoothing Weight: Normalization, Derivatives, Exponential Tilting, Moments, and First-Order Remainder the partial derivative ∂igs(z)=−zisgs(z)\partial_{i}g_{s}(z)=-\frac{z_{i}}{s}g_{s}(z) exists at every zz, so by the product rule in claim 1 of Constants, Affine Functions, Sums, Products and Quotients of Cᵏ Functions, for F=h gs∈CF=h\,g_{s}\in\mathcal{C},

∂iF(z)=∂ih(z) gs(z)+h(z) ∂igs(z)=(∂ih(z)−zish(z))gs(z),\partial_{i}F(z)=\partial_{i}h(z)\,g_{s}(z)+h(z)\,\partial_{i}g_{s}(z)=\Bigl(\partial_{i}h(z)-\frac{z_{i}}{s}h(z)\Bigr)g_{s}(z),

and ∂ih−zish\partial_{i}h-\frac{z_{i}}{s}h is smooth: ∂ih\partial_{i}h is of class CkC^{k} for every kk by clause 2 of Functions of Class Cᵏ on an Open Subset of ℝⁿ applied to h∈Ck+1h\in C^{k+1}, hence smooth; the coordinate function z↦ziz\mapsto z_{i} and the constant −1s-\frac1s are smooth by claim 2 of Constants, Affine Functions, Sums, Products and Quotients of Cᵏ Functions; and products and sums of smooth functions are smooth by claim 3 there. Thus ∂iF∈C\partial_{i}F\in\mathcal{C}, in particular ∂iF\partial_{i}F is continuous, and so every F∈CF\in\mathcal{C} is of class C1C^{1} (clauses 1 and 3 of Functions of Class Cᵏ on an Open Subset of ℝⁿ) with all partial derivatives in C\mathcal{C}. Let TT be the set of k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} such that every member of C\mathcal{C} is of class CkC^{k}; then 1∈T1\in T, and if k∈Tk\in T then every F∈CF\in\mathcal{C} is of class C1C^{1} with partial derivatives of class CkC^{k}, hence of class Ck+1C^{k+1} by clause 2 of Functions of Class Cᵏ on an Open Subset of ℝⁿ, so k+1∈Tk+1\in T; by Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers, T=NT=\mathbb{N}, and every member of C\mathcal{C} is smooth. In particular gs=1⋅gs∈Cg_{s}=1\cdot g_{s}\in\mathcal{C} is smooth. The first formula is claim 2 of The Gaussian Smoothing Weight: Normalization, Derivatives, Exponential Tilting, Moments, and First-Order Remainder. Applying the displayed rule to F=∂igsF=\partial_{i}g_{s}, that is h(z)=−zish(z)=-\frac{z_{i}}{s}, with ∂jh=−δijs\partial_{j}h=-\frac{\delta_{ij}}{s} (the partial derivative of a coordinate function is 11 or 00 according as the indices agree or not, by Partial Derivative of a Real-Valued Function on an Open Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n), gives

∂j∂igs(z)=(−δijs+zjzis2)gs(z);\partial_{j}\partial_{i}g_{s}(z)=\Bigl(-\frac{\delta_{ij}}{s}+\frac{z_{j}z_{i}}{s^{2}}\Bigr)g_{s}(z);

and applying it once more to h(z)=zizjs2−δijsh(z)=\frac{z_{i}z_{j}}{s^{2}}-\frac{\delta_{ij}}{s}, with ∂kh(z)=δikzj+δjkzis2\partial_{k}h(z)=\frac{\delta_{ik}z_{j}+\delta_{jk}z_{i}}{s^{2}} (product rule, claim 1 of Constants, Affine Functions, Sums, Products and Quotients of Cᵏ Functions), gives

∂k∂j∂igs(z)=(δikzj+δjkzis2−zks(zizjs2−δijs))gs(z)=(−zizjzks3+δijzk+δikzj+δjkzis2)gs(z),\partial_{k}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}g_{s}(z)=\Bigl(\frac{\delta_{ik}z_{j}+\delta_{jk}z_{i}}{s^{2}}-\frac{z_{k}}{s}\Bigl(\frac{z_{i}z_{j}}{s^{2}}-\frac{\delta_{ij}}{s}\Bigr)\Bigr)g_{s}(z)=\Bigl(-\frac{z_{i}z_{j}z_{k}}{s^{3}}+\frac{\delta_{ij}z_{k}+\delta_{ik}z_{j}+\delta_{jk}z_{i}}{s^{2}}\Bigr)g_{s}(z),

the stated formulas.

Claim 3 (bounds). Step (a): an elementary inequality. For every real u≥0u\ge0,

u exp⁡(−u2/4)≤1,u2exp⁡(−u2/4)≤4,u3exp⁡(−u2/4)≤512.u\,\exp(-u^{2}/4)\le1,\qquad u^{2}\exp(-u^{2}/4)\le4,\qquad u^{3}\exp(-u^{2}/4)\le512 .

Indeed, exp⁡(u2/4)≥1+u2/4≥u\exp(u^{2}/4)\ge1+u^{2}/4\ge u, the last by 0≤(u/2−1)2=u2/4−u+10\le(u/2-1)^{2}=u^{2}/4-u+1 (claim 5 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field and claim 2 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field), and exp⁡(u2/4)≥1+u2/4≥u2/4\exp(u^{2}/4)\ge1+u^{2}/4\ge u^{2}/4; multiplying by exp⁡(−u2/4)>0\exp(-u^{2}/4)>0 (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives the first two bounds. For the third, if u≤8u\le8 then u3≤83=512u^{3}\le8^{3}=512 (claim 5 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field, monotonicity of powers of nonnegative numbers) and exp⁡(−u2/4)≤1\exp(-u^{2}/4)\le1; if 8≤u8\le u then exp⁡(u2/4)=exp⁡(u2/8)2≥(1+u2/8)2≥(u2/8)2=u4/64\exp(u^{2}/4)=\exp(u^{2}/8)^{2}\ge(1+u^{2}/8)^{2}\ge(u^{2}/8)^{2}=u^{4}/64, so u3exp⁡(−u2/4)≤64u3/u4=64/u≤8≤512u^{3}\exp(-u^{2}/4)\le64u^{3}/u^{4}=64/u\le8\le512.

Step (b): pointwise bounds with a Gaussian factor. Fix zz, put u=∥z∥/s≥0u=\lVert z\rVert/\sqrt{s}\ge0, so that ∥z∥=s u\lVert z\rVert=\sqrt{s}\,u and ∥z∥2/(2s)=u2/2=u2/4+u2/4\lVert z\rVert^{2}/(2s)=u^{2}/2=u^{2}/4+u^{2}/4; hence ψs(z)=exp⁡(−u2/4)exp⁡(−u2/4)\psi_{s}(z)=\exp(-u^{2}/4)\exp(-u^{2}/4) and, by step (a), for m∈{1,2,3}m\in\{1,2,3\},

∥z∥m ψs(z)=(s)m umexp⁡(−u2/4) exp⁡(−u2/4)≤Dm(s)mexp⁡(−∥z∥2/(4s)),\lVert z\rVert^{m}\,\psi_{s}(z)=(\sqrt{s})^{m}\,u^{m}\exp(-u^{2}/4)\,\exp(-u^{2}/4)\le D_{m}(\sqrt{s})^{m}\exp\bigl(-\lVert z\rVert^{2}/(4s)\bigr),

with D1=1D_{1}=1, D2=4D_{2}=4, D3=512D_{3}=512. Since ∣zi∣≤∥z∥|z_{i}|\le\lVert z\rVert for every ii (claim 4 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square) and ∣δij∣≤1|\delta_{ij}|\le1, the formulas of claim 2 and the triangle inequality (claims 4 and 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field) give, with Es(z)=exp⁡(−∥z∥2/(4s))≤1E_{s}(z)=\exp(-\lVert z\rVert^{2}/(4s))\le1,

gs(z)≤csEs(z),∣∂igs(z)∣≤∥z∥scsψs(z)≤cs D1ssEs(z)=c1D1 s−(q+1)/2Es(z),g_{s}(z)\le c_{s}E_{s}(z),\qquad|\partial_{i}g_{s}(z)|\le\frac{\lVert z\rVert}{s}c_{s}\psi_{s}(z)\le c_{s}\,D_{1}\frac{\sqrt{s}}{s}E_{s}(z)=c_{1}D_{1}\,s^{-(q+1)/2}E_{s}(z), ∣∂j∂igs(z)∣≤(∥z∥2s2+1s)csψs(z)≤c1(D2+1) s−(q+2)/2Es(z),∣∂k∂j∂igs(z)∣≤(∥z∥3s3+3∥z∥s2)csψs(z)≤c1(D3+3D1) s−(q+3)/2Es(z),|\partial_{j}\partial_{i}g_{s}(z)|\le\Bigl(\frac{\lVert z\rVert^{2}}{s^{2}}+\frac1s\Bigr)c_{s}\psi_{s}(z)\le c_{1}(D_{2}+1)\,s^{-(q+2)/2}E_{s}(z),\qquad |\partial_{k}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}g_{s}(z)|\le\Bigl(\frac{\lVert z\rVert^{3}}{s^{3}}+\frac{3\lVert z\rVert}{s^{2}}\Bigr)c_{s}\psi_{s}(z)\le c_{1}(D_{3}+3D_{1})\,s^{-(q+3)/2}E_{s}(z),

using cs=c1s−q/2c_{s}=c_{1}s^{-q/2} (claim 1), ψs=Es2≤Es\psi_{s}=E_{s}^{2}\le E_{s} (since 0<Es≤10<E_{s}\le1) in the first bound and in the δij/s\delta_{ij}/s term of the third, and the power rules of the preamble (for instance (s)3/s3=s−3/2(\sqrt{s})^{3}/s^{3}=s^{-3/2} and s/s2=s−3/2\sqrt{s}/s^{2}=s^{-3/2}, so both terms of the last bound carry the same power of ss). Dropping the factor Es≤1E_{s}\le1 gives the uniform bounds with A0=c1A_{0}=c_{1}, A1=c1D1A_{1}=c_{1}D_{1}, A2=c1(D2+1)A_{2}=c_{1}(D_{2}+1), A3=c1(D3+3D1)A_{3}=c_{1}(D_{3}+3D_{1}), which depend only on qq (through c1c_{1}).

Step (c): square-integral bounds. Each of gsg_{s}, ∂igs\partial_{i}g_{s}, ∂j∂igs\partial_{j}\partial_{i}g_{s}, ∂k∂j∂igs\partial_{k}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}g_{s} is continuous (claim 2), hence Borel, and so is its square (claim 3 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps). Since Es(z)2=exp⁡(−∥z∥2/(2s))=ψs(z)E_{s}(z)^{2}=\exp(-\lVert z\rVert^{2}/(2s))=\psi_{s}(z), writing ∂βgs\partial^{\beta}g_{s} for any one of these four functions and ∣β∣∈{0,1,2,3}|\beta|\in\{0,1,2,3\} for its order, squaring the bounds of step (b) gives (∂βgs)2≤A∣β∣2 s−(q+∣β∣) ψs(\partial^{\beta}g_{s})^{2}\le A_{|\beta|}^{2}\,s^{-(q+|\beta|)}\,\psi_{s} and s−(q+∣β∣)=(s−(q+∣β∣)/2)2s^{-(q+|\beta|)}=(s^{-(q+|\beta|)/2})^{2}; by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion and ∫ψs=1/cs=sq/2/c1\int\psi_{s}=1/c_{s}=s^{q/2}/c_{1},

∫Rq(∂βgs)2 dλq≤A∣β∣2 s−(q+∣β∣) (s)qc1=A∣β∣2c1 s−(q+2∣β∣)/2,\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}(\partial^{\beta}g_{s})^{2}\,d\lambda_{q}\le A_{|\beta|}^{2}\,s^{-(q+|\beta|)}\,\frac{(\sqrt{s})^{q}}{c_{1}}=\frac{A_{|\beta|}^{2}}{c_{1}}\,s^{-(q+2|\beta|)/2},

a finite number, so the square is integrable (Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral), and B∣β∣=A∣β∣2/c1B_{|\beta|}=A_{|\beta|}^{2}/c_{1} serves.

Claim 4 (convolution identity). Let 0<s≤120<s\le\tfrac12, so that s/2≤1s/2\le1 and 2s≤12s\le1, and let x,x′∈Rqx,x'\in\mathbb{R}^{q}, m=12(x+x′)m=\tfrac12(x+x'). For y∈Rqy\in\mathbb{R}^{q} put a=y−xa=y-x and b=y−x′b=y-x', so a+b=2(y−m)a+b=2(y-m) and a−b=x′−xa-b=x'-x. Expanding ∥a±b∥2=(a±b)⋅(a±b)\lVert a\pm b\rVert^{2}=(a\pm b)\cdot(a\pm b) by the bilinearity and symmetry of the dot product (The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite, with ∥v∥2=v⋅v\lVert v\rVert^{2}=v\cdot v by The Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n) gives ∥a∥2+∥b∥2=12∥a+b∥2+12∥a−b∥2=2∥y−m∥2+12∥x−x′∥2\lVert a\rVert^{2}+\lVert b\rVert^{2}=\tfrac12\lVert a+b\rVert^{2}+\tfrac12\lVert a-b\rVert^{2}=2\lVert y-m\rVert^{2}+\tfrac12\lVert x-x'\rVert^{2}, using claim 5 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square and ∥x′−x∥=∥x−x′∥\lVert x'-x\rVert=\lVert x-x'\rVert (claim 2 there with Rn\mathbb{R}^n with the Euclidean Distance Is a Complete Metric Space with Coordinatewise Convergence). Hence

gs(y−x) gs(y−x′)=cs2exp⁡(−∥y−m∥22(s/2))exp⁡(−∥x−x′∥22(2s))=cs2cs/2 c2s gs/2(y−m) g2s(x−x′),g_{s}(y-x)\,g_{s}(y-x')=c_{s}^{2}\exp\Bigl(-\frac{\lVert y-m\rVert^{2}}{2(s/2)}\Bigr)\exp\Bigl(-\frac{\lVert x-x'\rVert^{2}}{2(2s)}\Bigr)=\frac{c_{s}^{2}}{c_{s/2}\,c_{2s}}\,g_{s/2}(y-m)\,g_{2s}(x-x'),

and cs/2c2s=c12(s/2 2s)−q=c12(s2)−q=c12s−q=cs2c_{s/2}c_{2s}=c_{1}^{2}\bigl(\sqrt{s/2}\,\sqrt{2s}\bigr)^{-q}=c_{1}^{2}(\sqrt{s^{2}})^{-q}=c_{1}^{2}s^{-q}=c_{s}^{2} by claim 1 and ab=ab\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}=\sqrt{ab}. So y↦gs(y−x)gs(y−x′)y\mapsto g_{s}(y-x)g_{s}(y-x') equals g2s(x−x′)⋅gs/2(y−m)g_{2s}(x-x')\cdot g_{s/2}(y-m), a nonnegative multiple of a Borel function with integral 11; it is integrable with integral g2s(x−x′)g_{2s}(x-x') by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion.

Claim 5 (moments and tails). For i∈[q]i\in[q] apply claim 4 of The Gaussian Smoothing Weight: Normalization, Derivatives, Exponential Tilting, Moments, and First-Order Remainder with a=eia=e_{i}, the iith standard basis vector: Za(z)=zi/sZ_{a}(z)=z_{i}/s and κa=∥ei∥2/s=1/s\kappa_{a}=\lVert e_{i}\rVert^{2}/s=1/s, so ∫Rqzi2s2gs(z) dz=1s\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\frac{z_{i}^{2}}{s^{2}}g_{s}(z)\,dz=\frac1s, whence ∫Rqzi2gs(z) dz=s\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}z_{i}^{2}g_{s}(z)\,dz=s by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (multiplication by the nonnegative constant s2s^{2}). Since ∥z∥2=∑i=1qzi2\lVert z\rVert^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{q}z_{i}^{2} (The Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n), the additivity in claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion, applied q−1q-1 times by induction on the number of summands (the inductive set being the set of n≤qn\le q for which the integral of ∑i=1nzi2gs\sum_{i=1}^{n}z_{i}^{2}g_{s} is nsns, with Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers and claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums), gives ∫∥z∥2gs=qs\int\lVert z\rVert^{2}g_{s}=qs, finite, so z↦∥z∥2gs(z)z\mapsto\lVert z\rVert^{2}g_{s}(z) (Borel by claim 3 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps and Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iv)) is integrable. Next, let t=qst=\sqrt{qs}, which is positive since qs>0qs>0 (claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field with claim 3 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field) and t2=qst^{2}=qs. For every zz, 0≤(∥z∥−t)2=∥z∥2−2t∥z∥+t20\le(\lVert z\rVert-t)^{2}=\lVert z\rVert^{2}-2t\lVert z\rVert+t^{2} (claim 5 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field and claim 2 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field), so 2t∥z∥≤∥z∥2+t22t\lVert z\rVert\le\lVert z\rVert^{2}+t^{2} (claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). Multiplying by gs(z)≥0g_{s}(z)\ge0 (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) and integrating, by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion with ∫gs=1\int g_{s}=1 and the first moment identity,

2t∫Rq∥z∥gs(z) dz≤qs+t2=2t2,2t\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\lVert z\rVert g_{s}(z)\,dz\le qs+t^{2}=2t^{2},

so the integral of the nonnegative Borel function z↦∥z∥gs(z)z\mapsto\lVert z\rVert g_{s}(z) is finite, the function is integrable, and ∫∥z∥gs(z) dz≤t=qs\int\lVert z\rVert g_{s}(z)\,dz\le t=\sqrt{qs} (multiplying by the positive (2t)−1(2t)^{-1}, claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). Finally let R>0R>0. For z∈ARz\in A_{R} one has R<∥z∥R<\lVert z\rVert, hence R2<∥z∥2R^{2}<\lVert z\rVert^{2} (claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field) and 1<∥z∥2/R21<\lVert z\rVert^{2}/R^{2} (claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field with the positive factor R−2R^{-2}); for z∉ARz\notin A_{R} the indicator vanishes. Thus 1AR(z) gs(z)≤R−2∥z∥2gs(z)\mathbf{1}_{A_{R}}(z)\,g_{s}(z)\le R^{-2}\lVert z\rVert^{2}g_{s}(z) for every zz, and the monotonicity and homogeneity in claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion give ∫1ARgs dλq≤R−2 qs\int\mathbf{1}_{A_{R}}g_{s}\,d\lambda_{q}\le R^{-2}\,qs, as claimed.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…