TheoremBase

Proof of Well-Posedness of the Langevin Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Common Noise and a Density Cost: Existence and Uniqueness of a Bounded Viscosity Solution

theoremthm:langevin-density-cost-well-posed-wasserstein-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 13,395 chars · 27 deps · depth 44 Reason: Proof of well-posedness with density cost, adapted from the Langevin well-posedness proof with constants -b/lambda0 and (b+L)/lambda0.

Comparison and uniqueness follow from the general comparison theorem and its corollary once the density-cost operator is shown to satisfy their hypotheses; existence follows from Perron's method between the constant sub- and supersolutions -b/lambda0 and (b+L)/lambda0, using 0 <= GPhiG_Phi <= L on the absolutely continuous score domain.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named at the point of use. The rules of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field for adding, multiplying and scaling equalities and inequalities (among them 0<10<1, the positivity of λ0−1\lambda_{0}^{-1} and λ0λ0−1=1\lambda_{0}\lambda_{0}^{-1}=1), and claims 1, 3 and 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, are used without further mention.

Step 0: the operator and the properties used. Let FF be the Langevin Hamilton-Jacobi operator with common noise and density cost, with potential VV, noise intensity σ\sigma, discount λ0\lambda_{0}, common-noise intensity κ\kappa, control cost θ\theta, running cost gg and integrand Φ\Phi; the data of the statement satisfy the standing assumptions of The Langevin Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Common Noise and a Density Cost on the Wasserstein Space, since θ\theta is positive. By The Langevin Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Common Noise and a Density Cost on the Wasserstein Space §operator, FF is a second-order equation operator over DΣ\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, which we take with δ\delta-shifts relative to the pair (D,DΣ,E,Σ)(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma},\mathcal{E},\Sigma); and by The Langevin Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Common Noise and a Density Cost on the Wasserstein Space §equation, a viscosity subsolution, supersolution or solution of the equation of the statement is a function D→R\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} that is a viscosity subsolution, supersolution or solution of FF relative to the pair, in the sense of Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on the Wasserstein Space §subsolution, Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on the Wasserstein Space §supersolution and Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on the Wasserstein Space §solution. We record the following properties.

(P1) By The Langevin Free-Energy Pair is a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair: Growth Bounds, Continuity of the Translation Hessian, and the First Variation of the Penalty §pair, the pair is a penalty pair on P2(Rd)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}); in particular DΣ⊆D\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\subseteq\mathcal{D} by Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §pair.

(P2) By The Langevin Free-Energy Pair is a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair: Growth Bounds, Continuity of the Translation Hessian, and the First Variation of the Penalty §coercive, the pair is Wasserstein-coercive and D\mathcal{D} has the map property.

(P3) By The Langevin Free-Energy Pair is Displacement Convex, with Closed Score Along Couplings and Regular Penalised Maxima §closed, the pair has closed score along couplings.

(P4) By The Langevin Free-Energy Pair is Displacement Convex, with Closed Score Along Couplings and Regular Penalised Maxima §regular, the pair has regular penalised maxima.

(P5) By The Langevin Free-Energy Pair is a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair: Growth Bounds, Continuity of the Translation Hessian, and the First Variation of the Penalty §growth, E\mathcal{E} is lower semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D} relative to D\mathcal{D}.

(P6) FF is degenerate elliptic. We apply The Langevin Hamilton-Jacobi Operator with a Density Cost Satisfies the Hypotheses of the Comparison Principle and of Perron's Method §elliptic with VV, with λ0\lambda_{0} and σ\sigma (positive), with θ\theta (which satisfies 0<θ≤10<\theta\le1), with κ\kappa and LL (nonnegative), with gg and with Φ\Phi (a convex Lipschitz integrand with constant LL); FF is the operator named there for these data, with δ\delta-shifts relative to the pair. Its hypothesis (Running cost) holds: for every ν∈P2(Rd)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) we have ∣g(ν)∣≤b≤∣b∣|g(\nu)|\le b\le|b| and 0≤∣b∣0\le|b|, so gg is bounded with bound ∣b∣|b|; and gg is uniformly continuous for W2W_{2} and the metric of The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Line by hypothesis, which is the uniform continuity required there.

(P7) FF is locally strictly proper and satisfies the shift-coercivity condition, the shift-semicontinuity condition and the second-order structure condition at uniquely mapped pairs. This is The Langevin Hamilton-Jacobi Operator with a Density Cost Satisfies the Hypotheses of the Comparison Principle and of Perron's Method §conclusion, applied with the same data as in (P6), whose hypothesis (Running cost) was verified there.

Part 1 (Comparison). Let uu and vv be as in clause 1, and let bu,bv∈Rb_{u},b_{v}\in\mathbb{R} satisfy u(μ)≤buu(\mu)\le b_{u} and bv≤v(μ)b_{v}\le v(\mu) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}. By Step 0, uu is a viscosity subsolution and vv a viscosity supersolution of FF relative to the pair. We apply A Comparison Principle for Viscosity Solutions on the Wasserstein Space §comparison to the pair, which is a Wasserstein-coercive penalty pair by (P1) and (P2), has closed score along couplings by (P3), and whose penalty domain D\mathcal{D} has the map property by (P2); to the operator FF, a second-order equation operator over DΣ\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} with δ\delta-shifts relative to the pair, which is locally strictly proper and satisfies the shift-coercivity, shift-semicontinuity and second-order structure conditions by (P7); and to uu, vv, b=bub=b_{u} and b′=bvb'=b_{v}. It gives u(μ)≤v(μ)u(\mu)\le v(\mu) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}.

Part 2 (Existence). Put c−=−λ0−1bc_{-}=-\lambda_{0}^{-1}b and c+=λ0−1(b+L)c_{+}=\lambda_{0}^{-1}(b+L), so that λ0c−=−b\lambda_{0}c_{-}=-b and λ0c+=b+L\lambda_{0}c_{+}=b+L.

Constant test functions. Let c∈{c−,c+}c\in\{c_{-},c_{+}\}. Let ϕc:Rd→R\phi_{c}:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} be the constant function with value cc. It is the function QQ of Quadratic and Affine Functions of Class C2C^2, Translation, and Quadratic Perturbation of Semiconvexity with n=dn=d, M=0d∈S(d)M=0_{d}\in\mathcal{S}(d), q=0Rdq=0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} and constant cc, because 0dz=0Rd0_{d}z=0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} and z⋅0Rd=0Rd⋅z=0z\cdot0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}=0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\cdot z=0 for z∈Rdz\in\mathbb{R}^{d}; so by Quadratic and Affine Functions of Class C2C^2, Translation, and Quadratic Perturbation of Semiconvexity §quadratic it is of class C2C^{2} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} with Dϕc(z)=0RdD\phi_{c}(z)=0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} and D2ϕc(z)=0dD^{2}\phi_{c}(z)=0_{d} for every z∈Rdz\in\mathbb{R}^{d}. Let χc:P2(Rd)→R\chi_{c}:\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d})\to\mathbb{R} be the constant function with value cc; then χc(μ)=ϕc(m(μ))\chi_{c}(\mu)=\phi_{c}(m(\mu)) for every μ\mu, with m(μ)m(\mu) the mean. By The Squared Wasserstein Distance to a Fixed Measure and Functions of the Mean are Intrinsic Test Functions §mean, applied with the subset D\mathcal{D} and ϕ=ϕc\phi=\phi_{c}, χc\chi_{c} is an intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D}, with ∇χc(μ)\nabla\chi_{c}(\mu) equal, for μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}, to the class in L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) of the constant map with value 00, and with Hχc(μ)=0dH_{\chi_{c}}(\mu)=0_{d} for every μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). That class is the zero vector 0μ0_{\mu} of L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) by The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §classes, applied, as in Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu, on the probability space (Rd,B(Rd),μ)(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\mu). Since DΣ⊆D\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\subseteq\mathcal{D} by (P1), Restrictions, Sums, Real Multiples and Differences of Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space §restriction shows that χc\chi_{c} is also an intrinsic test function on DΣ\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, with the same gradients along couplings and translation Hessians.

The operator at a constant. Let ν∈DΣ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}. By The Langevin Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Common Noise and a Density Cost on the Wasserstein Space §operator,

F(ν,χc(ν),∇χc(ν),Hχc(ν))=F(ν,c,0ν,0d)=λ0c−κ2 tr 0d+θ2∥0ν∥ν2+⟨∇V+σ22 ξν, 0ν⟩ν−g(ν)−GΦ(ν),F\bigl(\nu,\chi_{c}(\nu),\nabla\chi_{c}(\nu),H_{\chi_{c}}(\nu)\bigr)=F(\nu,c,0_{\nu},0_{d})=\lambda_{0}c-\frac{\kappa}{2}\,\mathrm{tr}\,0_{d}+\frac{\theta}{2}\lVert0_{\nu}\rVert_{\nu}^{2}+\Bigl\langle\nabla V+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\,\xi_{\nu},\,0_{\nu}\Bigr\rangle_{\nu}-g(\nu)-\mathcal{G}_{\Phi}(\nu),

where ∇V+σ22ξν=Σ(ν)\nabla V+\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\xi_{\nu}=\Sigma(\nu) as recorded in the statement of The Langevin Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Common Noise and a Density Cost on the Wasserstein Space, an element of Tν⊆L2(ν;Rd)T_{\nu}\subseteq L^{2}(\nu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) by Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §pair, the pair being a penalty pair by (P1). By the definition of the trace with p=dp=d, tr 0d\mathrm{tr}\,0_{d} is the sum of the dd diagonal entries of 0d0_{d}, each equal to 00, so tr 0d=0\mathrm{tr}\,0_{d}=0 by claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums with the factor 00. By Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu and The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §inner-product, L2(ν;Rd)L^{2}(\nu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) is a real inner product space with inner product ⟨⋅,⋅⟩ν\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{\nu}, norm ∥⋅∥ν\lVert\cdot\rVert_{\nu} and zero vector 0ν0_{\nu}, so ⟨Σ(ν),0ν⟩ν=0\langle\Sigma(\nu),0_{\nu}\rangle_{\nu}=0 and ∥0ν∥ν=0\lVert0_{\nu}\rVert_{\nu}=0 by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §zero. Hence

F(ν,χc(ν),∇χc(ν),Hχc(ν))=λ0c−g(ν)−GΦ(ν).F\bigl(\nu,\chi_{c}(\nu),\nabla\chi_{c}(\nu),H_{\chi_{c}}(\nu)\bigr)=\lambda_{0}c-g(\nu)-\mathcal{G}_{\Phi}(\nu).

Since ∣g(ν)∣≤b|g(\nu)|\le b, we have −b≤g(ν)≤b-b\le g(\nu)\le b. By the statement of The Langevin Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Common Noise and a Density Cost on the Wasserstein Space, ν\nu is absolutely continuous, and ν∈DΣ⊆D⊆P2(Rd)\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\subseteq\mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) by (P1) and Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §pair, so ν∈P2ac(Rd)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and 0≤GΦ(ν)≤L0\le\mathcal{G}_{\Phi}(\nu)\le L by The Density Cost of a Convex Lipschitz Integrand §cost, applied with LL and the convex Lipschitz integrand Φ\Phi with constant LL. For c=c−c=c_{-} the value is −b−g(ν)−GΦ(ν)≤−b−g(ν)≤0-b-g(\nu)-\mathcal{G}_{\Phi}(\nu)\le-b-g(\nu)\le0, and for c=c+c=c_{+} it is b+L−g(ν)−GΦ(ν)≥b−g(ν)≥0b+L-g(\nu)-\mathcal{G}_{\Phi}(\nu)\ge b-g(\nu)\ge0. As ν∈DΣ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} was arbitrary, χc−\chi_{c_{-}} is a classical subsolution and χc+\chi_{c_{+}} a classical supersolution of FF on DΣ\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}.

Growth. Let w−,w+:D→Rw_{-},w_{+}:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} be the restrictions of χc−\chi_{c_{-}} and χc+\chi_{c_{+}} to D\mathcal{D}. For c∈{c−,c+}c\in\{c_{-},c_{+}\} the restriction of χc\chi_{c} satisfies χc(μ)≤c\chi_{c}(\mu)\le c and c≤χc(μ)c\le\chi_{c}(\mu) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}, so by The Delta-Envelopes of Bounded Functions and Their Monotonicity in the Weight, for a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair §growth, applied to the pair, which is a Wasserstein-coercive penalty pair by (P1) and (P2), with bound cc, it has penalty-subordinate growth from above and from below.

Viscosity sub- and supersolution. We apply Classical Sub- and Supersolutions of a Degenerate Elliptic Equation on the Wasserstein Space are Viscosity Sub- and Supersolutions to the pair, which is a penalty pair by (P1) with regular penalised maxima by (P4) and with E\mathcal{E} lower semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D} relative to D\mathcal{D} by (P5), and to FF, a second-order equation operator over DΣ\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} that is degenerate elliptic by (P6). With the intrinsic test function χc−\chi_{c_{-}} on D\mathcal{D}, whose restriction w−w_{-} to D\mathcal{D} has penalty-subordinate growth from above and from below, and which is a classical subsolution of FF on DΣ\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, Classical Sub- and Supersolutions of a Degenerate Elliptic Equation on the Wasserstein Space are Viscosity Sub- and Supersolutions §subsolution shows that w−w_{-} is a viscosity subsolution of FF relative to the pair. With χc+\chi_{c_{+}}, which has the same two growth properties and is a classical supersolution of FF on DΣ\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, Classical Sub- and Supersolutions of a Degenerate Elliptic Equation on the Wasserstein Space are Viscosity Sub- and Supersolutions §supersolution shows that w+w_{+} is a viscosity supersolution of FF relative to the pair.

Order. Let ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D}. Then 0≤∣g(ν)∣≤b0\le|g(\nu)|\le b, so 0≤b0\le b and 0≤λ0−1b0\le\lambda_{0}^{-1}b; as LL is nonnegative, also 0≤b+L0\le b+L and 0≤λ0−1(b+L)0\le\lambda_{0}^{-1}(b+L), whence w−(ν)=−λ0−1b≤0≤λ0−1(b+L)=w+(ν)w_{-}(\nu)=-\lambda_{0}^{-1}b\le0\le\lambda_{0}^{-1}(b+L)=w_{+}(\nu).

Perron's method. We apply Perron's Method on the Wasserstein Space: Existence of a Viscosity Solution Between a Subsolution and a Supersolution to the pair, a Wasserstein-coercive penalty pair by (P1) and (P2) with regular penalised maxima by (P4), whose penalty domain has the map property by (P2); to FF, degenerate elliptic by (P6); with f=w−f=w_{-}, a viscosity subsolution with penalty-subordinate growth from below; with the supersolution written gg there taken to be w+w_{+}, a viscosity supersolution with penalty-subordinate growth from above; and with w−(ν)≤w+(ν)w_{-}(\nu)\le w_{+}(\nu) for every ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D}, as just shown. Let u:D→Ru:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} be the function defined there. By Perron's Method on the Wasserstein Space: Existence of a Viscosity Solution Between a Subsolution and a Supersolution §solution, uu is a viscosity solution of FF relative to the pair, hence, by Step 0, a viscosity solution of the equation; and by Perron's Method on the Wasserstein Space: Existence of a Viscosity Solution Between a Subsolution and a Supersolution §bounds, w−(ν)≤u(ν)≤w+(ν)w_{-}(\nu)\le u(\nu)\le w_{+}(\nu), that is −λ0−1b≤u(ν)≤λ0−1(b+L)-\lambda_{0}^{-1}b\le u(\nu)\le\lambda_{0}^{-1}(b+L), for every ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D}.

Part 3 (Uniqueness and continuity). By Step 0, a bounded viscosity solution of the equation is a bounded viscosity solution of FF relative to the pair. We apply Uniqueness and Continuity on Energy Sublevel Sets of Bounded Viscosity Solutions on the Wasserstein Space to the pair, a Wasserstein-coercive penalty pair by (P1) and (P2) with closed score along couplings by (P3), whose penalty domain has the map property by (P2), and to FF, a second-order equation operator over DΣ\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} with δ\delta-shifts relative to the pair that is locally strictly proper and satisfies the shift-coercivity, shift-semicontinuity and second-order structure conditions by (P7). If uu and vv are bounded viscosity solutions of the equation, then u(μ)=v(μ)u(\mu)=v(\mu) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D} by Uniqueness and Continuity on Energy Sublevel Sets of Bounded Viscosity Solutions on the Wasserstein Space §uniqueness. If uu is a bounded viscosity solution of the equation and c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R}, then by Uniqueness and Continuity on Energy Sublevel Sets of Bounded Viscosity Solutions on the Wasserstein Space §continuity the restriction of uu to {μ∈D:E(μ)≤c}\{\mu\in\mathcal{D}:\mathcal{E}(\mu)\le c\} is uniformly continuous for W2W_{2} restricted to that set and the metric of The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Line, which is the uniform continuity asserted in clause 3.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…