TheoremBase

Proof

Step 1: an almost sure event of good paths. By clause (a) of the martingale decomposition, there is an event Ω1∈F\Omega_1\in\mathcal{F} with P(Ω1)=1P(\Omega_1)=1 such that for every ω∈Ω1\omega\in\Omega_1 and every γ\gamma the path s↦bγ(Σs(ω),αs(ω))s\mapsto b^\gamma(\Sigma_s(\omega),\alpha_s(\omega)) is measurable on [0,T][0,T] and bounded in absolute value by 2(l−1)B2(l-1)B. Put Ω∗=Ω0∩Ω1\Omega_*=\Omega_0\cap\Omega_1. Its complement is the union of the two events Ω∖Ω0\Omega\setminus\Omega_0 and Ω∖Ω1\Omega\setminus\Omega_1, each of probability 00; these two events need not be disjoint, but countable subadditivity of a measure gives P(Ω∖Ω∗)=0P(\Omega\setminus\Omega_*)=0 and hence P(Ω∗)=1P(\Omega_*)=1. Also Ω∗⊆Ω0\Omega_*\subseteq\Omega_0.

Fix ω∈Ω∗\omega\in\Omega_* and γ\gamma. By condition 1 of the definition of a solution, each path t↦σti(ω)t\mapsto\sigma^i_t(\omega) is constant on each interval of a finite partition of [0,T][0,T] into intervals that are closed on the left, so each occupation indicator ηi,γ\eta^{i,\gamma} has this property too, and hence so does the empirical state measure Σγ=1N∑iηi,γ\Sigma^\gamma=\frac{1}{N}\sum_i\eta^{i,\gamma}, the relevant partition for the latter being the common refinement generated by the finitely many times tk(i)t^{(i)}_k with 1≤i≤N1\le i\le N. In particular t↦Σtγ(ω)t\mapsto\Sigma^\gamma_t(\omega) is right-continuous at every t∈[0,T)t\in[0,T), being constant on a right-neighbourhood of each such tt, and it is measurable in tt. The map t↦∫[0,t]1Ω0bγ(Σs,αs) dst\mapsto\int_{[0,t]}\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}b^\gamma(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)\,ds satisfies, for 0≤r≤t≤T0\le r\le t\le T,

∣∫[0,t]1Ω0bγ(Σs,αs)ds−∫[0,r]1Ω0bγ(Σs,αs)ds∣=∣∫[r,t]1Ω0bγ(Σs,αs)ds∣≤2(l−1)B (t−r).\Big|\int_{[0,t]}\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}b^\gamma(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)ds-\int_{[0,r]}\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}b^\gamma(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)ds\Big|=\Big|\int_{[r,t]}\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}b^\gamma(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)ds\Big|\le2(l-1)B\,(t-r).

Indeed the indicator functions of the three intervals satisfy 1[0,t]=1[0,r]+1[r,t]\mathbf{1}_{[0,t]}=\mathbf{1}_{[0,r]}+\mathbf{1}_{[r,t]} off the Lebesgue null set {r}\{r\}, so linearity of the integral gives the equality, and monotonicity of the integral together with the bound 2(l−1)B2(l-1)B of part (a) of the martingale decomposition gives the inequality. Hence that map is continuous in tt. Therefore t↦Mtγ(ω)t\mapsto M^\gamma_t(\omega) is right-continuous at every t∈[0,T)t\in[0,T), and since Σt∈Δl\Sigma_t\in\Delta^l gives ∣Σtγ∣≤1|\Sigma^\gamma_t|\le1 and ∣Σ0γ∣≤1|\Sigma^\gamma_0|\le1,

∣Mtγ(ω)∣≤1+1+2(l−1)BT=KM.|M^\gamma_t(\omega)|\le1+1+2(l-1)BT=K_M .

Step 2: Doob's inequality. By clause (b) of the martingale decomposition, each (Mtγ)t∈[0,T](M^\gamma_t)_{t\in[0,T]} is a square-integrable martingale with respect to the system filtration, with time index restricted to [0,T][0,T], and M0γ=0M^\gamma_0=0. Step 1 verifies the path hypotheses of Doob's L2 maximal inequality for bounded right-continuous martingales on the event Ω∗\Omega_*, with constant KMK_M. Only the properties P(Ω∗)=1P(\Omega_*)=1, Ω∗⊆Ω0\Omega_*\subseteq\Omega_0, and, for every ω∈Ω∗\omega\in\Omega_* and every γ\gamma, the right-continuity of t↦Σtγ(ω)t\mapsto\Sigma^\gamma_t(\omega) and the bound ∣Mtγ(ω)∣≤KM|M^\gamma_t(\omega)|\le K_M for every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T] and the right-continuity of t↦Mtγ(ω)t\mapsto M^\gamma_t(\omega), are used in Steps 2--4; hence the conclusions hold for any event with those properties. Hence each Mγ‾\overline{M^\gamma} is a random variable, with

E[(Mγ‾)2]≤4 E[(MTγ)2].\mathbb{E}\big[(\overline{M^\gamma})^2\big]\le4\,\mathbb{E}\big[(M^\gamma_T)^2\big] .

The map M‾\overline{M} is then a random variable, being the composition of the sequentially continuous map z↦∣z∣z\mapsto|z| on Rl\mathbb{R}^l with the map whose components are the Mγ‾\overline{M^\gamma}, by measurability of sequentially continuous functions of measurable Euclidean maps.

Step 3: the terminal second moment. Apply the first covariation identity of clause (c) of the martingale decomposition with r=0r=0, t=Tt=T, γ=δ\gamma=\delta, and with the conditioning event of that clause taken to be Ω\Omega, which lies in F0sys\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_0, and let Θ\Theta be the aggregate fluctuation covariance of β\beta, as in that theorem. (That clause writes DD for its conditioning event; in the present statement DD denotes the set of dyadic partition points, a different object.) Since M0γ=0M^\gamma_0=0,

E[(MTγ)2]=1N E[∫[0,T]1Ω0 Θγγ(Σs,αs) ds]≤2(l−1)B TN,\mathbb{E}\big[(M^\gamma_T)^2\big]=\frac{1}{N}\,\mathbb{E}\Big[\int_{[0,T]}\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\,\Theta^{\gamma\gamma}(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)\,ds\Big]\le\frac{2(l-1)B\,T}{N},

using the bound ∣Θγγ∣≤2(l−1)B|\Theta^{\gamma\gamma}|\le2(l-1)B from clause (a) of that theorem and monotonicity of the integral.

Step 4: conclusion. Combining Steps 2 and 3 and summing over the ll values of γ\gamma,

E[M‾ 2]=∑γ=1lE[(Mγ‾)2]≤∑γ=1l8(l−1)B TN=8 l (l−1)B TN.\mathbb{E}\big[\overline{M}^{\,2}\big]=\sum_{\gamma=1}^l\mathbb{E}\big[(\overline{M^\gamma})^2\big]\le\sum_{\gamma=1}^l\frac{8(l-1)B\,T}{N}=\frac{8\,l\,(l-1)B\,T}{N} .

Finally, for ω∈Ω∗\omega\in\Omega_* and t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T], the supremum clause of the supremum lemma gives ∣Mtγ(ω)∣≤Mγ‾(ω)|M^\gamma_t(\omega)|\le\overline{M^\gamma}(\omega) for each γ\gamma, so

∣Mt(ω)∣2=∑γ=1l(Mtγ(ω))2≤∑γ=1l(Mγ‾(ω))2=M‾(ω)2.■|M_t(\omega)|^2=\sum_{\gamma=1}^l\big(M^\gamma_t(\omega)\big)^2\le\sum_{\gamma=1}^l\big(\overline{M^\gamma}(\omega)\big)^2=\overline{M}(\omega)^2 . \qquad\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…