The difference F(q)-F(p) is the integral of f over [p,q], so bounds on f over [p,q] bound it; this gives the Lipschitz estimate and continuity, and, with the bounds f(x0)-eps/2 and f(x0)+eps/2 near a point of continuity, the derivative.
Proof of (ii). Let BβR with β£f(t)β£β€B for every tβ[a,b], and let x,yβ[a,b]. If x=y, both sides of the claimed inequality are 0. Otherwise let p be the smaller and q the larger of x and y, so p<q, β£F(y)βF(x)β£=β£F(q)βF(p)β£ and β£yβxβ£=qβp (Difference and Quotient Identities in β (i)). Every sβ[p,q] lies in [a,b] by Step 1, so βBβ€f(s)β€B. By (2) with c=βB and C=B, βB(qβp)β€F(q)βF(p)β€B(qβp), that is, β£F(y)βF(x)β£=β£F(q)βF(p)β£β€B(qβp)=Bβ£yβxβ£.
Proof of (iii). As f is bounded, there is BβR with β£f(t)β£β€B for every tβ[a,b]; then Bβ₯β£f(a)β£β₯0. Let xβ[a,b] and let Ξ΅>0 be real, and put Ξ΄=Ξ΅/(B+1), a real number with Ξ΄>0. Every yβ[a,b] with β£yβxβ£<Ξ΄ satisfies, by (ii),
Proof of (iv). Let x0ββ[a,b] be a point at which f is continuous, and let Ξ΅>0 be real. By The Real Line: Standing Notation and Background for Calculus on Intervals (vi), applied with Ξ΅/2, there is a real Ξ΄>0 such that every sβ[a,b] with β£sβx0ββ£<Ξ΄ satisfies β£f(s)βf(x0β)β£<Ξ΅/2. Let tβ[a,b] with 0<β£tβx0ββ£<Ξ΄, and let p be the smaller and q the larger of t and x0β, so p<q and qβp=β£tβx0ββ£. Every sβ[p,q] satisfies sβ[a,b] and β£sβx0ββ£β€qβp<Ξ΄, as x0β is one of p and q; hence f(x0β)βΞ΅/2β€f(s)β€f(x0β)+Ξ΅/2. By (2) with c=f(x0β)βΞ΅/2 and C=f(x0β)+Ξ΅/2, and dividing by qβp>0,
If t=q the quotient here is tβx0βF(t)βF(x0β)β; if t=p, numerator and denominator of tβx0βF(t)βF(x0β)β are the negatives of those of qβpF(q)βF(p)β (Difference and Quotient Identities in β (i)), so the two quotients agree again. Hence