TheoremBase

Proof of Lyapunov Representation and Positive Semidefiniteness for Linear Matrix Equations

lemmalem:lyapunov-equation-psd-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Kalman-Bucy phase Block B: representation-formula proof of the Lyapunov lemma; internally reviewed and validated; batch-approved by Aaron on 2026-07-31.

Proof

Preliminaries. We use: entrywise sums and products of continuous functions are continuous (Sum and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives and Continuity); matrix products are rearranged with Associativity of the Matrix Product; the transpose reversal (UV)=VU(UV)^{\top}=V^{\top}U^{\top} and the transpose-dot identity y(Mz)=(My)zy\cdot(Mz)=(M^{\top}y)\cdot z of claim 3 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals; and the identity x((atU(r)dr)x)=atx(U(r)x)drx\cdot\bigl(\bigl(\int_a^tU(r)\,dr\bigr)x\bigr)=\int_a^t x\cdot(U(r)x)\,dr of claim 6 there.

Claim 1. Uniqueness and existence. Identify k×kk\times k matrices with Rk2\mathbb{R}^{k^{2}} as in the proof conventions of Fundamental Solution and Variation of Constants for Linear Ordinary Differential Equations. The map F(t,X)=A(t)X+XA(t)+C(t)F(t,X)=A(t)X+XA(t)^{\top}+C(t) is composition continuous, and Lipschitz in XX with constant 2k3α2k^{3}\alpha where α\alpha bounds the entries of AA (entry estimates from claims 1 and 2 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals; Extreme Value Theorem on a Compact Interval for the bound). By Global Existence and Uniqueness for Lipschitz Ordinary Differential Equations in Integral Form there is exactly one continuous solution PP.

Representation. Let Φ,Ψ\Phi,\Psi be as in Fundamental Solution and Variation of Constants for Linear Ordinary Differential Equations and put Y(t)=atΨ(r)C(r)Ψ(r)drY(t)=\int_a^t\Psi(r)C(r)\Psi(r)^{\top}\,dr (entrywise; the integrand has continuous entries). By claim 4 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals the entries of YY are continuous on all of [a,b][a,b], and by Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part I in One Dimension they are differentiable at interior points with Y=ΨCΨY'=\Psi C\Psi^{\top}. Define P^(t)=Φ(t)(P0+Y(t))Φ(t)\widehat P(t)=\Phi(t)\bigl(P_0+Y(t)\bigr)\Phi(t)^{\top}; its entries are continuous on [a,b][a,b]. On (a,b)(a,b): Φ=AΦ\Phi'=A\Phi, and (Φ)=(Φ)=(AΦ)=ΦA(\Phi^{\top})'=(\Phi')^{\top}=(A\Phi)^{\top}=\Phi^{\top}A^{\top} (transposition commutes with entrywise differentiation, being a relabelling of entries); the product and sum rules (Sum and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives and Continuity, applied entrywise to the finite sums defining the products) give

P^=AΦ(P0+Y)Φ+ΦΨCΨΦ+Φ(P0+Y)ΦA=AP^+C+P^A,\widehat P'=A\Phi(P_0+Y)\Phi^{\top}+\Phi\,\Psi C\Psi^{\top}\,\Phi^{\top}+\Phi(P_0+Y)\Phi^{\top}A^{\top}=A\widehat P+C+\widehat PA^{\top},

using ΦΨ=Ik\Phi\Psi=I_k (identity matrix) and ΨΦ=(ΦΨ)=Ik\Psi^{\top}\Phi^{\top}=(\Phi\Psi)^{\top}=I_k. Since the entries of the right side are continuous on [a,b][a,b] and P^(a)=P0\widehat P(a)=P_0, each entry of P^\widehat P is an antiderivative of the corresponding entry, and Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part II in One Dimension, applied on [a,t][a,t] for each tt (degenerate t=at=a by the convention of Mean-Square Riemann Integral of a Family of Random Variables), yields the integral equation for P^\widehat P; by the uniqueness just proved, P=P^P=\widehat P.

Claim 2. Suppose P0=P0P_0^{\top}=P_0 and C(t)=C(t)C(t)^{\top}=C(t) for all tt. Transposing the integral equation entrywise (the transpose of an entrywise integral is the entrywise integral of the transpose, a relabelling) and using (AP)=PA(AP)^{\top}=P^{\top}A^{\top} and (PA)=AP(PA^{\top})^{\top}=AP^{\top} (claim 3 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals) shows that tP(t)t\mapsto P(t)^{\top} satisfies the same integral equation; by uniqueness, P(t)=P(t)P(t)^{\top}=P(t).

Claim 3. Suppose additionally that P0P_0 and every C(t)C(t) are positive semidefinite. Fix tt and xRkx\in\mathbb{R}^{k}, and put w=Φ(t)xw=\Phi(t)^{\top}x. By the transpose-dot identity (twice) and the representation,

x(P(t)x)=w((P0+Y(t))w)=w(P0w)+w(Y(t)w),x\cdot\bigl(P(t)x\bigr)=w\cdot\bigl((P_0+Y(t))w\bigr)=w\cdot(P_0w)+w\cdot\bigl(Y(t)w\bigr),

and by claim 6 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals and the transpose-dot identity again,

w(Y(t)w)=atw(Ψ(r)C(r)Ψ(r)w)dr=at(Ψ(r)w)(C(r)(Ψ(r)w))dr0,w\cdot\bigl(Y(t)w\bigr)=\int_a^t w\cdot\bigl(\Psi(r)C(r)\Psi(r)^{\top}w\bigr)\,dr=\int_a^t\bigl(\Psi(r)^{\top}w\bigr)\cdot\Bigl(C(r)\bigl(\Psi(r)^{\top}w\bigr)\Bigr)\,dr\ge0,

the integrand being continuous and nonnegative (monotonicity of the integral via Agreement of the Riemann and Lebesgue Integrals for Continuous Functions on a Closed Interval and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral; degenerate t=at=a by the convention of Mean-Square Riemann Integral of a Family of Random Variables). Also w(P0w)0w\cdot(P_0w)\ge0. Hence x(P(t)x)0x\cdot(P(t)x)\ge0; with the symmetry from claim 2, P(t)P(t) is positive semidefinite. \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…