TheoremBase

Each clause is the standard three-term estimate: the limit is compared with a single member of the sequence, chosen by uniform convergence, whose own continuity supplies the remaining term.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named in the step where it is cited. Since dR(s,t)=∣s−t∣d_{\mathbb{R}}(s,t)=|s-t| by The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Numbers, the defining condition of Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces for a map gg from AA into R\mathbb{R}, continuous at xx relative to AA, reads: for every real ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is a real δ>0\delta>0 such that every y∈Ay\in A with dX(x,y)<δd_{X}(x,y)<\delta satisfies ∣g(y)−g(x)∣<ε|g(y)-g(x)|<\varepsilon; the condition of Uniformly Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces is read in the same way.

A quarter of ε\varepsilon. Let ε\varepsilon be a real number with 0<ε0<\varepsilon. Applying claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field first to ε\varepsilon and then to the number it produces, we obtain a real η\eta with 0<η0<\eta and η+η+η+η=ε\eta+\eta+\eta+\eta=\varepsilon. Claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied to the strict inequality 0<η0<\eta and the non-strict inequality η+η+η≤η+η+η\eta+\eta+\eta\le\eta+\eta+\eta, gives

η+η+η=0+(η+η+η)<η+(η+η+η)=ε.\eta+\eta+\eta=0+(\eta+\eta+\eta)<\eta+(\eta+\eta+\eta)=\varepsilon .

We refer to such an η\eta below as a quarter of ε\varepsilon. We also use twice, in Claims 2 and 4, the following consequence of claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field: if α<η\alpha<\eta, β<η\beta<\eta and γ<η\gamma<\eta, then α+β+γ<η+η+η\alpha+\beta+\gamma<\eta+\eta+\eta, by applying that claim first to α<η\alpha<\eta together with β≤η\beta\le\eta and then to the resulting strict inequality together with γ≤η\gamma\le\eta.

Claim 1. Let T⊆S⊆AT\subseteq S\subseteq A and suppose that (fk)k∈N(f_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} converges uniformly to ff on SS.

For uniform convergence on TT, let ε>0\varepsilon>0. By Pointwise and Uniform Convergence of a Sequence of Real-Valued Maps (ii) there is K∈NK\in\mathbb{N} such that ∣fk(x)−f(x)∣<ε|f_{k}(x)-f(x)|<\varepsilon for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} with K≤kK\le k and every x∈Sx\in S. Every x∈Tx\in T lies in SS, so the same KK witnesses that condition with TT in place of SS; hence (fk)k∈N(f_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} converges uniformly to ff on TT.

For pointwise convergence on SS, fix x∈Sx\in S and let ε>0\varepsilon>0. With KK as above, ∣fk(x)−f(x)∣<ε|f_{k}(x)-f(x)|<\varepsilon for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} with K≤kK\le k, which is the condition of Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers for the sequence of real numbers (fk(x))k∈N(f_{k}(x))_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and the limit f(x)f(x). As x∈Sx\in S was arbitrary, Pointwise and Uniform Convergence of a Sequence of Real-Valued Maps (i) gives pointwise convergence to ff on SS.

Claim 2. Let xx, rr and SS be as in the statement and let ε>0\varepsilon>0. The choices below are made in this order: ε\varepsilon is given, then a quarter η\eta of ε\varepsilon, then KK, then δ0\delta_{0}, then δ\delta.

First, x∈Sx\in S. Indeed dX(x,x)=0<rd_{X}(x,x)=0<r by the axioms of Metric Space, so xx lies in the open ball BdX(x,r)B_{d_{X}}(x,r) by Open Ball in a Metric Space; as also x∈Ax\in A, the hypothesis on SS places xx in SS.

By Pointwise and Uniform Convergence of a Sequence of Real-Valued Maps (ii) there is K∈NK\in\mathbb{N} such that ∣fk(y)−f(y)∣<η|f_{k}(y)-f(y)|<\eta for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} with K≤kK\le k and every y∈Sy\in S; we use this for k=Kk=K only. Since fKf_{K} is continuous at xx relative to AA, there is a real δ0>0\delta_{0}>0 such that every y∈Ay\in A with dX(x,y)<δ0d_{X}(x,y)<\delta_{0} satisfies ∣fK(y)−fK(x)∣<η|f_{K}(y)-f_{K}(x)|<\eta. Let δ\delta be the least of the two numbers δ0\delta_{0} and rr, which is positive and satisfies δ≤δ0\delta\le\delta_{0} and δ≤r\delta\le r, by claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

Now let y∈Ay\in A satisfy dX(x,y)<δd_{X}(x,y)<\delta. Then dX(x,y)<rd_{X}(x,y)<r, so y∈BdX(x,r)y\in B_{d_{X}}(x,r), and y∈Ay\in A, so y∈Sy\in S; hence ∣f(y)−fK(y)∣<η|f(y)-f_{K}(y)|<\eta, using claim 2 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field to exchange the two arguments. Since x∈Sx\in S, likewise ∣fK(x)−f(x)∣<η|f_{K}(x)-f(x)|<\eta. Also dX(x,y)<δ0d_{X}(x,y)<\delta_{0}, so ∣fK(y)−fK(x)∣<η|f_{K}(y)-f_{K}(x)|<\eta. Two applications of the triangle inequality, claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, give

∣f(y)−f(x)∣≤∣f(y)−fK(y)∣+∣fK(y)−fK(x)∣+∣fK(x)−f(x)∣,|f(y)-f(x)|\le|f(y)-f_{K}(y)|+|f_{K}(y)-f_{K}(x)|+|f_{K}(x)-f(x)| ,

and the right-hand side is smaller than η+η+η\eta+\eta+\eta by the consequence recorded above, hence smaller than ε\varepsilon. As ε>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, ff is continuous at xx relative to AA.

Claim 3. Let x∈Ax\in A. The number 11 is positive by claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and the set AA contains every point of BdX(x,1)B_{d_{X}}(x,1) that lies in AA. Each fkf_{k}, being continuous on AA, is continuous at xx relative to AA by Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces, and (fk)k∈N(f_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} converges uniformly to ff on AA. So Claim 2, applied with r=1r=1 and S=AS=A, shows that ff is continuous at xx relative to AA. As x∈Ax\in A was arbitrary, ff is continuous on AA.

Claim 4. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0 and let η\eta be a quarter of ε\varepsilon. The choices are made in this order: ε\varepsilon, then η\eta, then KK, then δ\delta. By Pointwise and Uniform Convergence of a Sequence of Real-Valued Maps (ii) there is K∈NK\in\mathbb{N} with ∣fk(y)−f(y)∣<η|f_{k}(y)-f(y)|<\eta for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} with K≤kK\le k and every y∈Ay\in A; we use this for k=Kk=K only. Since fKf_{K} is uniformly continuous on AA, Uniformly Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces provides a real δ>0\delta>0 such that all u,v∈Au,v\in A with dX(u,v)<δd_{X}(u,v)<\delta satisfy ∣fK(u)−fK(v)∣<η|f_{K}(u)-f_{K}(v)|<\eta.

Let u,v∈Au,v\in A satisfy dX(u,v)<δd_{X}(u,v)<\delta. Then, by two applications of the triangle inequality, claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, together with claim 2 of that lemma,

∣f(u)−f(v)∣≤∣f(u)−fK(u)∣+∣fK(u)−fK(v)∣+∣fK(v)−f(v)∣,|f(u)-f(v)|\le|f(u)-f_{K}(u)|+|f_{K}(u)-f_{K}(v)|+|f_{K}(v)-f(v)| ,

and each of the three terms on the right is smaller than η\eta, so the right-hand side is smaller than η+η+η\eta+\eta+\eta, hence smaller than ε\varepsilon. As ε>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, ff is uniformly continuous on AA.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…