TheoremBase

Simple approximants dominated by the absolute value of the function converge to it pointwise, and dominated convergence applied to the p-th power of the difference gives convergence in seminorm.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data appearing in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named in the statement above. We use countable choice, to select one approximating simple function for each index.

Claim 1. If XX is empty then Z=βˆ…Z=\varnothing has measure 00 and the unique map Xβ†’RX\to\mathbb{R} lies in Lp\mathcal{L}^{p}, its integral being 00; both sides of the asserted equivalence hold and there is nothing to prove. Assume therefore that XX is nonempty, so that a simple function on (X,F)(X,\mathcal{F}) has at least one value.

Let s=βˆ‘i=1rci1Ais=\sum_{i=1}^{r}c_{i}\mathbf{1}_{A_{i}} be the standard representation of Simple Functions, Nonnegative Simple Functions, and the Simple Integral, with the cic_{i} the distinct values of ss and Ai=sβˆ’1({ci})∈FA_{i}=s^{-1}(\{c_{i}\})\in\mathcal{F}. The set Z={x∈X:s(x)β‰ 0}Z=\{x\in X:s(x)\ne0\} is the union of those AiA_{i} with ciβ‰ 0c_{i}\ne0, a union of finitely many members of F\mathcal{F}, so Z∈FZ\in\mathcal{F} in every case; only its measure is at issue.

Suppose ΞΌ(Z)<∞\mu(Z)<\infty. Let KK be the largest of the finitely many numbers ∣c1∣,…,∣cr∣|c_{1}|,\dots,|c_{r}|. For xβˆ‰Zx\notin Z we have s(x)=0s(x)=0 and hence (∣s(x)∣)p=0(|s(x)|)^{p}=0, while for x∈Zx\in Z we have ∣s(x)βˆ£β‰€K|s(x)|\le K and hence (∣s(x)∣)p≀Kp(|s(x)|)^{p}\le K^{p} by Properties of Real Powers (v). So ∣s∣p≀Kp1Z|s|^{p}\le K^{p}\mathbf{1}_{Z} pointwise, and by the monotonicity and homogeneity in claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion together with The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set,

∫X∣s∣p dμ≀KpΞΌ(Z)<∞,\int_{X}|s|^{p}\,d\mu\le K^{p}\mu(Z)<\infty ,

so s∈Lps\in\mathcal{L}^{p}, the map ss being measurable.

Conversely suppose s∈Lps\in\mathcal{L}^{p}. If ZZ is empty then ΞΌ(Z)=0<∞\mu(Z)=0<\infty. Otherwise let cc be the smallest of the numbers ∣ci∣|c_{i}| with ciβ‰ 0c_{i}\ne0, a positive real number, so that cβ‰€βˆ£s(x)∣c\le|s(x)| for every x∈Zx\in Z and hence cp1Zβ‰€βˆ£s∣pc^{p}\mathbf{1}_{Z}\le|s|^{p} pointwise by Properties of Real Powers (v). As above this gives cpΞΌ(Z)β‰€βˆ«X∣s∣p dΞΌ<∞c^{p}\mu(Z)\le\int_{X}|s|^{p}\,d\mu<\infty. Since cpc^{p} is positive by Properties of Real Powers (i), the value ΞΌ(Z)=∞\mu(Z)=\infty would force cpΞΌ(Z)=∞c^{p}\mu(Z)=\infty; hence ΞΌ(Z)<∞\mu(Z)<\infty.

Claim 2. By Approximation of Measurable Functions by Dyadic Simple Functions (iii) there is a sequence (sm)m∈N(s_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} of simple functions with ∣smβˆ£β‰€βˆ£f∣|s_{m}|\le|f| pointwise and with (sm(x))m(s_{m}(x))_{m} converging to f(x)f(x) for every x∈Xx\in X. By Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (iii) each sms_{m} lies in Lp\mathcal{L}^{p}.

For every xx and mm, claims 2 and 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field give ∣f(x)βˆ’sm(x)βˆ£β‰€βˆ£f(x)∣+∣sm(x)βˆ£β‰€2∣f(x)∣|f(x)-s_{m}(x)|\le|f(x)|+|s_{m}(x)|\le 2|f(x)|, so by Properties of Real Powers (v) and Properties of Real Powers (iii),

(∣f(x)βˆ’sm(x)∣)p≀2p(∣f(x)∣)p,\bigl(|f(x)-s_{m}(x)|\bigr)^{p}\le 2^{p}\bigl(|f(x)|\bigr)^{p},

and the map 2p∣f∣p2^{p}|f|^{p} is integrable because f∈Lpf\in\mathcal{L}^{p}. Moreover (∣f(x)βˆ’sm(x)∣)m(|f(x)-s_{m}(x)|)_{m} converges to 00 for every xx, hence so does ((∣f(x)βˆ’sm(x)∣)p)m((|f(x)-s_{m}(x)|)^{p})_{m} by Properties of Real Powers (vii) together with 0p=00^{p}=0. The maps ∣fβˆ’sm∣p|f-s_{m}|^{p} are measurable by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (i), so The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (vii), applied with the limit function 0X0_{X}, gives

lim⁑mβ†’βˆžβˆ«X∣fβˆ’sm∣p dΞΌ=0.\lim_{m\to\infty}\int_{X}|f-s_{m}|^{p}\,d\mu=0 .

By Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (i) this integral is (βˆ₯fβˆ’smβˆ₯p)p(\lVert f-s_{m}\rVert_{p})^{p}, and applying Properties of Real Powers (vii) with the exponent 1/p1/p, together with ((βˆ₯fβˆ’smβˆ₯p)p)1/p=βˆ₯fβˆ’smβˆ₯p((\lVert f-s_{m}\rVert_{p})^{p})^{1/p}=\lVert f-s_{m}\rVert_{p} and 01/p=00^{1/p}=0, we get that βˆ₯fβˆ’smβˆ₯p\lVert f-s_{m}\rVert_{p} converges to 00. In particular there is mm with βˆ₯fβˆ’smβˆ₯p≀Ρ\lVert f-s_{m}\rVert_{p}\le\varepsilon, and s=sms=s_{m} is as required.

Claim 3. Let F∈LpF\in L^{p} and let f∈Lpf\in\mathcal{L}^{p} be a representative of FF. For each m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} apply claim 2 with the positive number 1/m1/m and choose a simple sm∈Lps_{m}\in\mathcal{L}^{p} with βˆ₯fβˆ’smβˆ₯p≀1/m\lVert f-s_{m}\rVert_{p}\le 1/m. Then [sm]∈S[s_{m}]\in S and

dp(F,[sm])=βˆ₯fβˆ’smβˆ₯p≀1m,d_{p}\bigl(F,[s_{m}]\bigr)=\lVert f-s_{m}\rVert_{p}\le\frac{1}{m},

by the formula for dpd_{p} in The Riesz–Fischer Theorem (i). Since (1/m)m(1/m)_{m} converges to 00, claim 3 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences shows that (dp(F,[sm]))m(d_{p}(F,[s_{m}]))_{m} converges to 00, that is, ([sm])m([s_{m}])_{m} converges to FF in (Lp,dp)(L^{p},d_{p}). By Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space the point FF lies in the closure of SS. As FF was arbitrary, that closure is all of LpL^{p}, so SS is dense in LpL^{p}.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…