Throughout, 1 { P } \mathbf{1}\{P\} 1 { P } denotes 1 1 1 if the condition P P P holds and 0 0 0 otherwise, and claim numbers of Linearisation of a Perturbed Controlled Aggregate Flow Along a Comparison Pair: Exact Variation-of-Constants Identity and Residual Bound , Variation of Constants with Bounded Measurable Forcing and the Two-Parameter Fundamental Solution and Cell-Count Form of a Compensated Counting-Path Functional Along a Time Change: Window-Discrepancy Bounds for the Time-Change and Partial-Cell Errors are cited by name of the lemma. By the definition of the label rate in the setting of Shared-Clock Point Insertion into the Open-Loop Aggregate Solution: Exact Response Identity, Crude Bound, and Linearisation Defect , ψ c ( Σ , α ) = Σ σ β ˉ ( σ , γ , Σ , α ) \psi_c(\Sigma,\alpha)=\Sigma^\sigma\bar{\beta}(\sigma,\gamma,\Sigma,\alpha) ψ c ( Σ , α ) = Σ σ β ˉ ( σ , γ , Σ , α ) for c = ( σ , γ ) c=(\sigma,\gamma) c = ( σ , γ ) , and β ˉ = β \bar{\beta}=\beta β ˉ = β on Δ l × A \Delta^l\times\mathcal{A} Δ l × A by condition 1 of Twice Continuously Differentiable Extension of a Transition-Rate Family ; hence ψ c ( Σ , α ) = Σ σ β ( σ , γ , Σ , α ) \psi_c(\Sigma,\alpha)=\Sigma^\sigma\beta(\sigma,\gamma,\Sigma,\alpha) ψ c ( Σ , α ) = Σ σ β ( σ , γ , Σ , α ) on Δ l × A \Delta^l\times\mathcal{A} Δ l × A , and the consumed clock time of Open-Loop Aggregate Solution Driven by Aggregate Transition Clocks reads C t c = ∫ [ 0 , t ] N ψ c ( Σ u , a u ) d u \mathsf{C}^{c}_t=\int_{[0,t]}N\psi_c(\Sigma_u,a_u)\,du C t c = ∫ [ 0 , t ] N ψ c ( Σ u , a u ) d u , its integrand being measurable with values in [ 0 , N B ] [0,NB] [ 0 , NB ] as recorded in that definition. For the comparison pair, u ↦ ψ c ( S u , A u ) = S u σ β ( σ , γ , S u , A u ) u\mapsto\psi_c(S_u,\mathsf{A}_u)=S^\sigma_u\beta(\sigma,\gamma,S_u,\mathsf{A}_u) u ↦ ψ c ( S u , A u ) = S u σ β ( σ , γ , S u , A u ) is measurable: the map ( Σ , α ) ↦ β ( σ , γ , Σ , α ) (\Sigma,\alpha)\mapsto\beta(\sigma,\gamma,\Sigma,\alpha) ( Σ , α ) ↦ β ( σ , γ , Σ , α ) is sequentially continuous on Δ l × A \Delta^l\times\mathcal{A} Δ l × A for the Euclidean distance on R l + m \mathbb{R}^{l+m} R l + m by condition 2 of Transition-Rate Family (the distances d ( Σ n , Σ ) d(\Sigma_n,\Sigma) d ( Σ n , Σ ) and d ( α n , α ) d(\alpha_n,\alpha) d ( α n , α ) being each at most d ( ( Σ n , α n ) , ( Σ , α ) ) d((\Sigma_n,\alpha_n),(\Sigma,\alpha)) d (( Σ n , α n ) , ( Σ , α )) ), so u ↦ β ( σ , γ , S u , A u ) u\mapsto\beta(\sigma,\gamma,S_u,\mathsf{A}_u) u ↦ β ( σ , γ , S u , A u ) is measurable by Sequentially Continuous Functions of Measurable Euclidean Maps are Measurable , and the product with the measurable coordinate u ↦ S u σ u\mapsto S^\sigma_u u ↦ S u σ is measurable by claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions ; its values lie in [ 0 , B ] [0,B] [ 0 , B ] because 0 ≤ S u σ ≤ 1 0\le S^\sigma_u\le1 0 ≤ S u σ ≤ 1 and 0 ≤ β ≤ B 0\le\beta\le B 0 ≤ β ≤ B (condition 1 of Transition-Rate Family ). This proves the first assertion of claim 1.
Claim 1. By condition 1 of Open-Loop Aggregate Solution Driven by Aggregate Transition Clocks , Σ \Sigma Σ takes values in G N ⊆ Δ l \mathbb{G}_N\subseteq\Delta^l G N ⊆ Δ l and is constant on each of finitely many intervals partitioning [ 0 , T ] [0,T] [ 0 , T ] ; each component is therefore a finite sum of constants times indicators of intervals, which are measurable by claims 1 and 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions (an interval in [ 0 , T ] [0,T] [ 0 , T ] is a Borel set, being an intersection of [ 0 , T ] [0,T] [ 0 , T ] with a Borel subset of the real line), so Σ \Sigma Σ is bounded measurable; y y y is measurable with values in Δ l \Delta^l Δ l by hypothesis, so e = Σ − y e=\Sigma-y e = Σ − y is bounded measurable, and ∣ e t ∣ ≤ 2 |e_t|\le2 ∣ e t ∣ ≤ 2 since ∣ z ∣ ≤ 1 |z|\le1 ∣ z ∣ ≤ 1 for z ∈ Δ l z\in\Delta^l z ∈ Δ l (the coordinates being nonnegative with sum 1 1 1 , ∣ z ∣ 2 = ∑ σ ( z σ ) 2 ≤ ( ∑ σ z σ ) 2 = 1 |z|^{2}=\sum_\sigma(z^\sigma)^{2}\le(\sum_\sigma z^\sigma)^{2}=1 ∣ z ∣ 2 = ∑ σ ( z σ ) 2 ≤ ( ∑ σ z σ ) 2 = 1 ). For each c c c , claim 1 of Cumulative-Rate Time Change: Regularity, Substitution, and Crossing Times applied to the rate u ↦ N ψ c ( Σ u , a u ) u\mapsto N\psi_c(\Sigma_u,a_u) u ↦ N ψ c ( Σ u , a u ) , measurable with values in [ 0 , N B ] [0,NB] [ 0 , NB ] (the cumulative rate there, an integral over [ 0 , T ] [0,T] [ 0 , T ] against the indicator of [ 0 , t ] [0,t] [ 0 , t ] , agrees with the integral over the compact interval [ 0 , t ] [0,t] [ 0 , t ] by claim 2 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval , both being the integral of the same zero extension over the real line), shows that C c \mathsf{C}^{c} C c is nondecreasing and continuous on [ 0 , T ] [0,T] [ 0 , T ] with C 0 c = 0 \mathsf{C}^{c}_0=0 C 0 c = 0 and C T c ≤ N B T ≤ R \mathsf{C}^{c}_T\le NBT\le R C T c ≤ NBT ≤ R ; the same applies to C ˉ c \bar{\mathsf{C}}^{c} C ˉ c with the rate N ϕ c N\phi_c N ϕ c , measurable with values in [ 0 , N B ] [0,NB] [ 0 , NB ] by the first assertion of claim 1. Continuous functions on [ 0 , T ] [0,T] [ 0 , T ] are measurable by claim 4 of Measurability of Countable Suprema, Bounded Pointwise Limits, Monotone Functions, and Continuous Functions .
Fix q = ( c , j ) q=(c,j) q = ( c , j ) with C ˉ T c ≥ b j c \bar{\mathsf{C}}^{c}_T\ge \mathsf{b}^{c}_j C ˉ T c ≥ b j c and let Z = { u ∈ [ 0 , T ] : C ˉ u c ≥ b j c } Z=\{u\in[0,T]:\bar{\mathsf{C}}^{c}_u\ge \mathsf{b}^{c}_j\} Z = { u ∈ [ 0 , T ] : C ˉ u c ≥ b j c } , nonempty since T ∈ Z T\in Z T ∈ Z , and let τ ˉ \bar{\tau} τ ˉ be its greatest lower bound. Then C ˉ τ ˉ c ≥ b j c \bar{\mathsf{C}}^{c}_{\bar{\tau}}\ge \mathsf{b}^{c}_j C ˉ τ ˉ c ≥ b j c : otherwise, by continuity at τ ˉ \bar{\tau} τ ˉ there is δ > 0 \delta>0 δ > 0 with C ˉ u c < b j c \bar{\mathsf{C}}^{c}_u<\mathsf{b}^{c}_j C ˉ u c < b j c for all u ∈ [ 0 , T ] u\in[0,T] u ∈ [ 0 , T ] with ∣ u − τ ˉ ∣ < δ |u-\bar{\tau}|<\delta ∣ u − τ ˉ ∣ < δ , whereas by the definition of the greatest lower bound some element of Z Z Z lies in [ τ ˉ , τ ˉ + δ ) [\bar{\tau},\bar{\tau}+\delta) [ τ ˉ , τ ˉ + δ ) . Hence τ ˉ ∈ Z \bar{\tau}\in Z τ ˉ ∈ Z is the least element of Z Z Z , and since C ˉ c \bar{\mathsf{C}}^{c} C ˉ c is nondecreasing, Z = [ τ ˉ , T ] Z=[\bar{\tau},T] Z = [ τ ˉ , T ] .
By condition 2 of Open-Loop Aggregate Solution Driven by Aggregate Transition Clocks , Σ t = x 0 + 1 N ∑ c v c p c ( C t c ) \Sigma_t=x_0+\frac{1}{N}\sum_cv_c\,p^{c}(\mathsf{C}^{c}_t) Σ t = x 0 + N 1 ∑ c v c p c ( C t c ) . By linearity of the integral and the definition b = ∑ c v c ψ c b=\sum_cv_c\psi_c b = ∑ c v c ψ c in Linearisation of a Perturbed Controlled Aggregate Flow Along a Comparison Pair: Exact Variation-of-Constants Identity and Residual Bound (its integrand below being bounded measurable by claim 1 there),
1 N ∑ c v c C t c = ∫ [ 0 , t ] ∑ c v c ψ c ( Σ u , a u ) d u = ∫ [ 0 , t ] b ( Σ u , a u ) d u , \frac{1}{N}\sum_cv_c\,\mathsf{C}^{c}_t=\int_{[0,t]}\sum_cv_c\,\psi_c(\Sigma_u,a_u)\,du=\int_{[0,t]}b(\Sigma_u,a_u)\,du , N 1 c ∑ v c C t c = ∫ [ 0 , t ] c ∑ v c ψ c ( Σ u , a u ) d u = ∫ [ 0 , t ] b ( Σ u , a u ) d u ,
so Σ t = x 0 + ∫ [ 0 , t ] b ( Σ u , a u ) d u + 1 N ∑ c v c ( p c ( C t c ) − C t c ) = x 0 + ∫ [ 0 , t ] b ( Σ u , a u ) d u + m t \Sigma_t=x_0+\int_{[0,t]}b(\Sigma_u,a_u)\,du+\frac{1}{N}\sum_cv_c\bigl(p^{c}(\mathsf{C}^{c}_t)-\mathsf{C}^{c}_t\bigr)=x_0+\int_{[0,t]}b(\Sigma_u,a_u)\,du+\mathfrak{m}_t Σ t = x 0 + ∫ [ 0 , t ] b ( Σ u , a u ) d u + N 1 ∑ c v c ( p c ( C t c ) − C t c ) = x 0 + ∫ [ 0 , t ] b ( Σ u , a u ) d u + m t . Each u ↦ p c ( C u c ) u\mapsto p^{c}(\mathsf{C}^{c}_u) u ↦ p c ( C u c ) is bounded measurable by claim 1 of Cell-Count Form of a Compensated Counting-Path Functional Along a Time Change: Window-Discrepancy Bounds for the Time-Change and Partial-Cell Errors (C c \mathsf{C}^{c} C c being measurable with values in [ 0 , R ] [0,R] [ 0 , R ] ), so m \mathfrak{m} m is bounded measurable (claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions ), and m 0 = 0 \mathfrak{m}_0=0 m 0 = 0 since p c ( 0 ) = 0 = C 0 c p^{c}(0)=0=\mathsf{C}^{c}_0 p c ( 0 ) = 0 = C 0 c . The hypotheses of Linearisation of a Perturbed Controlled Aggregate Flow Along a Comparison Pair: Exact Variation-of-Constants Identity and Residual Bound on x = Σ x=\Sigma x = Σ , y y y , a a a and m \mathfrak{m} m are thus all met.
Claim 2. By the definition of L T L_T L T and of m \mathfrak{m} m , using claims 1 and 2 of Linearity, Compatibility with the Matrix Product, and a Norm Bound for the Matrix-Vector Product (linearity of z ↦ Φ E ( T , u ) ( E u ⋆ z ) z\mapsto\Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(T,u)(\mathcal{E}^{\star}_uz) z ↦ Φ E ( T , u ) ( E u ⋆ z ) , and Φ E ( T , u ) ( E u ⋆ v c ) = H u c \Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(T,u)(\mathcal{E}^{\star}_uv_c)=H^{c}_u Φ E ( T , u ) ( E u ⋆ v c ) = H u c ) and linearity of the integral over the finite sum,
L T ( m ) = 1 N ∑ c ( v c M ˉ c ( C T c ) + ∫ [ 0 , T ] H u c M ˉ c ( C u c ) d u ) = 1 N ∑ c Λ c ( C c ) , L_T(\mathfrak{m})=\frac{1}{N}\sum_c\Bigl(v_c\,\bar{M}^{c}(\mathsf{C}^{c}_T)+\int_{[0,T]}H^{c}_u\,\bar{M}^{c}(\mathsf{C}^{c}_u)\,du\Bigr)=\frac{1}{N}\sum_c\Lambda^{c}(\mathsf{C}^{c}), L T ( m ) = N 1 c ∑ ( v c M ˉ c ( C T c ) + ∫ [ 0 , T ] H u c M ˉ c ( C u c ) d u ) = N 1 c ∑ Λ c ( C c ) ,
where H c H^{c} H c is bounded measurable by claim 2 of Variation of Constants with Bounded Measurable Forcing and the Two-Parameter Fundamental Solution , applied to g u = E u ⋆ v c g_u=\mathcal{E}^{\star}_uv_c g u = E u ⋆ v c , which is bounded measurable because the entries of u ↦ E ( S u , A u ) u\mapsto\mathcal{E}(S_u,\mathsf{A}_u) u ↦ E ( S u , A u ) are (claim 1 of Linearisation of a Perturbed Controlled Aggregate Flow Along a Comparison Pair: Exact Variation-of-Constants Identity and Residual Bound ) and its components are finite linear combinations of them (claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions ), with ∣ H u c ∣ ≤ Φ ˉ 2 ∣ E u ⋆ v c ∣ ≤ Φ ˉ 2 Λ E 2 |H^{c}_u|\le\bar{\Phi}^{2}|\mathcal{E}^{\star}_uv_c|\le\bar{\Phi}^{2}\Lambda_{\mathcal{E}}\sqrt{2} ∣ H u c ∣ ≤ Φ ˉ 2 ∣ E u ⋆ v c ∣ ≤ Φ ˉ 2 Λ E 2 by claim 1 of Linearisation of a Perturbed Controlled Aggregate Flow Along a Comparison Pair: Exact Variation-of-Constants Identity and Residual Bound , whence ∥ H c ∥ 1 ≤ 2 Φ ˉ 2 Λ E T \lVert H^{c}\rVert_1\le\sqrt{2}\bar{\Phi}^{2}\Lambda_{\mathcal{E}}T ∥ H c ∥ 1 ≤ 2 Φ ˉ 2 Λ E T by monotonicity . Multiplying by N \sqrt{N} N and taking the dot product with c \mathbf{c} c gives the first identity.
Fix a label c ′ c' c ′ and apply claim 4 of Cell-Count Form of a Compensated Counting-Path Functional Along a Time Change: Window-Discrepancy Bounds for the Time-Change and Partial-Cell Errors to p = p c ′ p=p^{c'} p = p c ′ , the cells b j c ′ \mathsf{b}^{c'}_j b j c ′ , s = T s=T s = T , C = C c ′ \mathsf{C}=\mathsf{C}^{c'} C = C c ′ , C ˉ = C ˉ c ′ \bar{\mathsf{C}}=\bar{\mathsf{C}}^{c'} C ˉ = C ˉ c ′ (measurable with values in [ 0 , R ] [0,R] [ 0 , R ] by claim 1, and satisfying ∣ C u c ′ − C ˉ u c ′ ∣ ≤ w 1 |\mathsf{C}^{c'}_u-\bar{\mathsf{C}}^{c'}_u|\le w_1 ∣ C u c ′ − C ˉ u c ′ ∣ ≤ w 1 by (CD)), v = v c ′ v=v_{c'} v = v c ′ and H = H c ′ H=H^{c'} H = H c ′ : with the cell coefficients α j c ′ = v c ′ 1 { b j c ′ ≤ C ˉ T c ′ } + ∫ [ 0 , T ] 1 { b j c ′ ≤ C ˉ u c ′ } H u c ′ d u \alpha^{c'}_j=v_{c'}\mathbf{1}\{\mathsf{b}^{c'}_j\le\bar{\mathsf{C}}^{c'}_T\}+\int_{[0,T]}\mathbf{1}\{\mathsf{b}^{c'}_j\le\bar{\mathsf{C}}^{c'}_u\}H^{c'}_u\,du α j c ′ = v c ′ 1 { b j c ′ ≤ C ˉ T c ′ } + ∫ [ 0 , T ] 1 { b j c ′ ≤ C ˉ u c ′ } H u c ′ d u of that lemma,
∣ Λ c ′ ( C c ′ ) − ∑ j = 1 J c ′ ( K c ′ , j − μ c ′ , j ) α j c ′ ∣ ≤ ( ∣ v c ′ ∣ + ∥ H c ′ ∥ 1 ) ( D i s c w 1 ( p c ′ ) + D i s c μ max ( p c ′ ) ) , \Bigl|\Lambda^{c'}(\mathsf{C}^{c'})-\sum_{j=1}^{J_{c'}}(\mathsf{K}_{c',j}-\mu_{c',j})\,\alpha^{c'}_j\Bigr|\le\bigl(|v_{c'}|+\lVert H^{c'}\rVert_1\bigr)\bigl(\mathrm{Disc}_{w_1}(p^{c'})+\mathrm{Disc}_{\mu_{\max}}(p^{c'})\bigr), Λ c ′ ( C c ′ ) − j = 1 ∑ J c ′ ( K c ′ , j − μ c ′ , j ) α j c ′ ≤ ( ∣ v c ′ ∣ + ∥ H c ′ ∥ 1 ) ( Disc w 1 ( p c ′ ) + Disc μ m a x ( p c ′ ) ) ,
where the lemma's bound is stated with its own maximal cell length μ max c ′ = max 1 ≤ j ≤ J c ′ μ c ′ , j ≤ μ max \mu^{c'}_{\max}=\max_{1\le j\le J_{c'}}\mu_{c',j}\le\mu_{\max} μ m a x c ′ = max 1 ≤ j ≤ J c ′ μ c ′ , j ≤ μ m a x and we have used D i s c μ max c ′ ( p c ′ ) ≤ D i s c μ max ( p c ′ ) \mathrm{Disc}_{\mu^{c'}_{\max}}(p^{c'})\le\mathrm{Disc}_{\mu_{\max}}(p^{c'}) Disc μ m a x c ′ ( p c ′ ) ≤ Disc μ m a x ( p c ′ ) : for 0 ≤ w ≤ w ′ 0\le w\le w' 0 ≤ w ≤ w ′ the set whose least upper bound defines D i s c w ( p c ′ ) \mathrm{Disc}_w(p^{c'}) Disc w ( p c ′ ) is contained in the one defining D i s c w ′ ( p c ′ ) \mathrm{Disc}_{w'}(p^{c'}) Disc w ′ ( p c ′ ) , both nonempty and bounded above by p c ′ ( R ) + R p^{c'}(R)+R p c ′ ( R ) + R , so the least upper bound is nondecreasing in w w w . Here ∣ v c ′ ∣ = 2 |v_{c'}|=\sqrt{2} ∣ v c ′ ∣ = 2 because v c ′ = δ γ − δ σ v_{c'}=\delta_\gamma-\delta_\sigma v c ′ = δ γ − δ σ with σ ≠ γ \sigma\neq\gamma σ = γ has exactly two nonzero coordinates, 1 1 1 and − 1 -1 − 1 . We identify c ⋅ α j c ′ \mathbf{c}\cdot\alpha^{c'}_j c ⋅ α j c ′ with α ( c ′ , j ) \alpha_{(c',j)} α ( c ′ , j ) . If C ˉ T c ′ < b j c ′ \bar{\mathsf{C}}^{c'}_T<\mathsf{b}^{c'}_j C ˉ T c ′ < b j c ′ , both indicators vanish for every u u u (C ˉ c ′ \bar{\mathsf{C}}^{c'} C ˉ c ′ being nondecreasing), so α j c ′ = 0 = α ( c ′ , j ) \alpha^{c'}_j=0=\alpha_{(c',j)} α j c ′ = 0 = α ( c ′ , j ) . If C ˉ T c ′ ≥ b j c ′ \bar{\mathsf{C}}^{c'}_T\ge \mathsf{b}^{c'}_j C ˉ T c ′ ≥ b j c ′ , then by claim 1 the indicator u ↦ 1 { b j c ′ ≤ C ˉ u c ′ } u\mapsto\mathbf{1}\{\mathsf{b}^{c'}_j\le\bar{\mathsf{C}}^{c'}_u\} u ↦ 1 { b j c ′ ≤ C ˉ u c ′ } is the indicator of [ τ ˉ , T ] [\bar{\tau},T] [ τ ˉ , T ] with τ ˉ = τ ˉ ( c ′ , j ) \bar{\tau}=\bar{\tau}_{(c',j)} τ ˉ = τ ˉ ( c ′ , j ) , so, the integral over [ 0 , T ] [0,T] [ 0 , T ] of a function vanishing off [ τ ˉ , T ] [\bar{\tau},T] [ τ ˉ , T ] being its integral over [ τ ˉ , T ] [\bar{\tau},T] [ τ ˉ , T ] (claim 2 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval , both being the integral of the same zero extension over the real line),
α j c ′ = v c ′ + ∫ [ τ ˉ , T ] Φ E ( T , u ) E u ⋆ v c ′ d u = Φ E ( T , τ ˉ ) v c ′ \alpha^{c'}_j=v_{c'}+\int_{[\bar{\tau},T]}\Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(T,u)\,\mathcal{E}^{\star}_u\,v_{c'}\,du=\Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(T,\bar{\tau})\,v_{c'} α j c ′ = v c ′ + ∫ [ τ ˉ , T ] Φ E ( T , u ) E u ⋆ v c ′ d u = Φ E ( T , τ ˉ ) v c ′
by claim 1 of Variation of Constants with Bounded Measurable Forcing and the Two-Parameter Fundamental Solution , whose integrand Φ E ( T , u ) ( E u ⋆ v c ′ ) \Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(T,u)(\mathcal{E}^{\star}_uv_{c'}) Φ E ( T , u ) ( E u ⋆ v c ′ ) equals H u c ′ H^{c'}_u H u c ′ by claim 2 of Linearity, Compatibility with the Matrix Product, and a Norm Bound for the Matrix-Vector Product ; hence c ⋅ α j c ′ = α ( c ′ , j ) \mathbf{c}\cdot\alpha^{c'}_j=\alpha_{(c',j)} c ⋅ α j c ′ = α ( c ′ , j ) . Summing over c ′ c' c ′ , dividing by N \sqrt{N} N , and using ∣ c ⋅ z ∣ ≤ ∣ c ∣ ∣ z ∣ |\mathbf{c}\cdot z|\le|\mathbf{c}||z| ∣ c ⋅ z ∣ ≤ ∣ c ∣∣ z ∣ (Cauchy-Schwarz ) together with the triangle inequality yields the bound E c e l l \mathsf{E}_{\mathrm{cell}} E cell .
Claim 3. By claim 1, claims 3 and 4 of Linearisation of a Perturbed Controlled Aggregate Flow Along a Comparison Pair: Exact Variation-of-Constants Identity and Residual Bound apply: e T = Φ E ( T , 0 ) e 0 + L T ( m ) + ∫ [ 0 , T ] Φ E ( T , u ) ρ u d u e_T=\Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(T,0)e_0+L_T(\mathfrak{m})+\int_{[0,T]}\Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(T,u)\rho_u\,du e T = Φ E ( T , 0 ) e 0 + L T ( m ) + ∫ [ 0 , T ] Φ E ( T , u ) ρ u d u with ∣ ∫ [ 0 , T ] Φ E ( T , u ) ρ u d u ∣ ≤ Φ ˉ 2 ∫ [ 0 , T ] ∣ ρ u ∣ d u |\int_{[0,T]}\Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(T,u)\rho_u\,du|\le\bar{\Phi}^{2}\int_{[0,T]}|\rho_u|\,du ∣ ∫ [ 0 , T ] Φ E ( T , u ) ρ u d u ∣ ≤ Φ ˉ 2 ∫ [ 0 , T ] ∣ ρ u ∣ d u , and e 0 = x 0 − y 0 e_0=x_0-y_0 e 0 = x 0 − y 0 since Σ 0 = x 0 \Sigma_0=x_0 Σ 0 = x 0 (condition 2 of Open-Loop Aggregate Solution Driven by Aggregate Transition Clocks at t = 0 t=0 t = 0 , where every C 0 c = 0 \mathsf{C}^{c}_0=0 C 0 c = 0 and p c ( 0 ) = 0 p^{c}(0)=0 p c ( 0 ) = 0 ). Taking the dot product with c \mathbf{c} c , multiplying by N \sqrt{N} N , subtracting 1 N ∑ q α q ( K q − μ q ) \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\sum_q\alpha_q(\mathsf{K}_q-\mu_q) N 1 ∑ q α q ( K q − μ q ) and using claim 2, the triangle inequality, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and ∣ Φ E ( T , 0 ) e 0 ∣ ≤ Φ ˉ 2 ∣ e 0 ∣ |\Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(T,0)e_0|\le\bar{\Phi}^{2}|e_0| ∣ Φ E ( T , 0 ) e 0 ∣ ≤ Φ ˉ 2 ∣ e 0 ∣ gives the displayed bound with E r e s = N ∫ [ 0 , T ] ∣ ρ u ∣ d u \mathsf{E}_{\mathrm{res}}=\sqrt{N}\int_{[0,T]}|\rho_u|\,du E res = N ∫ [ 0 , T ] ∣ ρ u ∣ d u . For the bound on E r e s \mathsf{E}_{\mathrm{res}} E res , claim 2 of Linearisation of a Perturbed Controlled Aggregate Flow Along a Comparison Pair: Exact Variation-of-Constants Identity and Residual Bound gives, for every u u u , with ∣ e u ∣ ≤ e ˉ / N |e_u|\le\bar{e}/\sqrt{N} ∣ e u ∣ ≤ e ˉ / N ,
∣ ρ u ∣ ≤ 2 l ( l − 1 ) Λ 2 e ˉ 2 N + 2 l ( l − 1 ) Λ 3 e ˉ N ∣ y u − S u ∣ + 2 e ˉ N d u , |\rho_u|\le\sqrt{2}\,l(l-1)\Lambda_2\frac{\bar{e}^{2}}{N}+\sqrt{2}\,l(l-1)\Lambda_3\frac{\bar{e}}{\sqrt{N}}|y_u-S_u|+\sqrt{2}\,\frac{\bar{e}}{\sqrt{N}}\mathsf{d}_u , ∣ ρ u ∣ ≤ 2 l ( l − 1 ) Λ 2 N e ˉ 2 + 2 l ( l − 1 ) Λ 3 N e ˉ ∣ y u − S u ∣ + 2 N e ˉ d u ,
where e ˉ \bar{e} e ˉ , the least upper bound of the nonempty set { N ∣ e u ∣ : u ∈ [ 0 , T ] } \{\sqrt{N}|e_u|:u\in[0,T]\} { N ∣ e u ∣ : u ∈ [ 0 , T ]} bounded above by 2 N 2\sqrt{N} 2 N , is a real number. The maps u ↦ ∣ y u − S u ∣ u\mapsto|y_u-S_u| u ↦ ∣ y u − S u ∣ and u ↦ d u u\mapsto\mathsf{d}_u u ↦ d u are bounded measurable (Norm Bound for a Vector-Valued Lebesgue Integral over a Compact Interval for the norm of the bounded measurable y − S y-S y − S ; claim 1 of Linearisation of a Perturbed Controlled Aggregate Flow Along a Comparison Pair: Exact Variation-of-Constants Identity and Residual Bound for d \mathsf{d} d ), so integrating over [ 0 , T ] [0,T] [ 0 , T ] by monotonicity and linearity and multiplying by N \sqrt{N} N gives the stated bound.