TheoremBase

Proof of A Real Hilbert Space Containing an Orthonormal Sequence Is Not Finite-Dimensional

lemmalem:orthonormal-sequence-not-finite-dimensional-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 3,763 chars · 16 deps · depth 18 Reason: Proof that a real Hilbert space containing an orthonormal sequence is not finite-dimensional, by contradiction from a spanning orthonormal tuple and Bessel's inequality.

A spanning orthonormal tuple would make the sum of the squared coordinates of each member of the orthonormal sequence equal to one, while Bessel's inequality forces each of those finitely many coordinates to tend to zero.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. For sRs\in\mathbb{R} we write s2=sss^{2}=ss, and s|s| is the absolute value of ss.

Suppose, for a contradiction, that HH is finite-dimensional.

Step 1 (the space is not the zero space). Since (fj)jN(f_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} is orthonormal, f1,f1=1\langle f_{1},f_{1}\rangle=1 by Orthogonality, Orthogonal Complement and Orthonormal Families in a Real Inner Product Space §orthonormal, that is, f12=1|f_{1}|^{2}=1 by Real Inner Product Space §norm. Were f1=0Hf_{1}=0_{H}, we should have f1=0|f_{1}|=0 by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §vanishing and hence f12=0|f_{1}|^{2}=0, whereas 010\ne1 by claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. So f10Hf_{1}\ne0_{H}, and therefore H{0H}H\ne\{0_{H}\}.

Step 2 (a spanning orthonormal tuple). The set HH is a linear subspace of HH: it contains 0H0_{H} and is closed under the addition and scalar multiplication of HH. It is finite-dimensional by assumption and differs from {0H}\{0_{H}\} by step 1, so claim 2 of Gram-Schmidt Orthonormalisation in a Real Inner Product Space, applied with the inner product space HH in the role of EE and with L=HL=H, provides a natural number mm and an orthonormal mm-tuple eHme\in H^{m}, with components e1,,eme_{1},\dots,e_{m}, such that span(e)=H\operatorname{span}(e)=H.

Step 3 (each member of the sequence has unit coordinate sum). Let P:HHP:H\to H be the map of Projection onto the Span of an Orthonormal Tuple, and Coordinates on a Finite-Dimensional Subspace formed with this ee, namely Px=i=1mx,eieiPx=\sum_{i=1}^{m}\langle x,e_{i}\rangle e_{i}, and let M=span(e)M=\operatorname{span}(e), so that M=HM=H by step 2. By Projection onto the Span of an Orthonormal Tuple, and Coordinates on a Finite-Dimensional Subspace §projection we have Px=xPx=x for every xMx\in M, hence for every xHx\in H; and by Projection onto the Span of an Orthonormal Tuple, and Coordinates on a Finite-Dimensional Subspace §pythagoras, Px2=i=1mx,ei2|Px|^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{m}\langle x,e_{i}\rangle^{2}. Taking x=fjx=f_{j} and using fj2=fj,fj=1|f_{j}|^{2}=\langle f_{j},f_{j}\rangle=1, which holds by Orthogonality, Orthogonal Complement and Orthonormal Families in a Real Inner Product Space §orthonormal and Real Inner Product Space §norm,

i=1mfj,ei2=1for every jN.\sum_{i=1}^{m}\langle f_{j},e_{i}\rangle^{2}=1\qquad\text{for every }j\in\mathbb{N}.

Step 4 (each coordinate tends to zero). Let ii be a natural number with 1im1\le i\le m. By Orthonormal Expansions in a Real Hilbert Space §bessel, applied to the orthonormal sequence (fj)jN(f_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} and to the vector eie_{i}, the series j=1ei,fj2\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\langle e_{i},f_{j}\rangle^{2} converges; hence the sequence (ei,fj2)jN(\langle e_{i},f_{j}\rangle^{2})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} converges to 00 by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers. Since fj,ei=ei,fj\langle f_{j},e_{i}\rangle=\langle e_{i},f_{j}\rangle by Real Inner Product Space §inner-product, the sequence (fj,ei2)jN(\langle f_{j},e_{i}\rangle^{2})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} converges to 00 as well.

Step 5 (contradiction). Apply Finite Sums of Real Numbers: Nonnegativity, Domination by the Sum, and Limits §limit with N=mN=m to the mm sequences of step 4, indexed by ii: the sequence whose jj-th term is i=1mfj,ei2\sum_{i=1}^{m}\langle f_{j},e_{i}\rangle^{2} converges to i=1m0\sum_{i=1}^{m}0, which is 00 by claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums applied with λ=0\lambda=0. By step 3 that sequence is constant with value 11. Taking ε=1\varepsilon=1 in Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers there is accordingly some index at which 10<1|1-0|<1; but 010\le1 by claim 1 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so 10=1=1|1-0|=|1|=1 by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, and 1<11<1 contradicts the irreflexivity of the strict order of Ordered Field.

Hence the assumption was false, and HH is not finite-dimensional.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…