TheoremBase

Unfolds the outer measure as the infimum of the set of total lengths of covers and reads off the four clauses from the definition of an infimum and the approximation property of infima in the extended real line.

Proof

By Lebesgue Outer Measure on the Real Line (ii), Ξ»βˆ—:P(R)β†’[0,∞]\lambda^{*}:\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R})\to[0,\infty] is a map with Ξ»βˆ—(A)=inf⁑C(A)\lambda^{*}(A)=\inf\mathcal{C}(A), where C(A)\mathcal{C}(A) is the set of Lebesgue Outer Measure on the Real Line (i): a subset of [0,∞][0,\infty] with s∈C(A)s\in\mathcal{C}(A) if and only if s=βˆ‘m∈N(bmβˆ’am)s=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}(b_{m}-a_{m}) for some cover (a,b)(a,b) of AA (Total Lengths of Covers by Open Intervals: the Set of Them and the Map of Their Infima (i)). The infimum is formed in [βˆ’βˆž,∞][-\infty,\infty] with ≀\le and exists by Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (iii); by Bounds, Least and Greatest Elements, Suprema and Infima for a Partial Order (iv) it is the greatest element of the set Lb⁑(C(A))\operatorname{Lb}(\mathcal{C}(A)) of lower bounds of C(A)\mathcal{C}(A). So, by Bounds, Least and Greatest Elements, Suprema and Infima for a Partial Order (iii) and Bounds, Least and Greatest Elements, Suprema and Infima for a Partial Order (i): Ξ»βˆ—(A)≀s\lambda^{*}(A)\le s for every s∈C(A)s\in\mathcal{C}(A); and every t∈[βˆ’βˆž,∞]t\in[-\infty,\infty] with t≀st\le s for every s∈C(A)s\in\mathcal{C}(A) is an element of Lb⁑(C(A))\operatorname{Lb}(\mathcal{C}(A)) and satisfies tβ‰€Ξ»βˆ—(A)t\le\lambda^{*}(A).

Proof of (i). As a subclass of the set R\mathbb{R}, AA is a set (Subclasses of Sets Are Sets, the Union and Power Set of a Set Exist Uniquely, Binary Unions of Sets Are Sets, and the Universal Class Is Proper (i)), so A∈P(R)A\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}), and Ξ»βˆ—(A)\lambda^{*}(A) is the value at AA of a map into [0,∞][0,\infty].

Proof of (ii). Let (a,b)(a,b) be a cover of AA and s=βˆ‘m∈N(bmβˆ’am)s=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}(b_{m}-a_{m}). Then s∈C(A)s\in\mathcal{C}(A), so Ξ»βˆ—(A)≀s\lambda^{*}(A)\le s.

Proof of (iii). Let tt be as there and s∈C(A)s\in\mathcal{C}(A). Then s=βˆ‘m∈N(bmβˆ’am)s=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}(b_{m}-a_{m}) for some cover (a,b)(a,b) of AA, so t≀st\le s by hypothesis. Hence t≀st\le s for every s∈C(A)s\in\mathcal{C}(A), and tβ‰€Ξ»βˆ—(A)t\le\lambda^{*}(A).

Proof of (iv). As inf⁑C(A)=Ξ»βˆ—(A)<t\inf\mathcal{C}(A)=\lambda^{*}(A)<t, Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (x), applied to the subset C(A)\mathcal{C}(A) of [βˆ’βˆž,∞][-\infty,\infty], gives s∈C(A)s\in\mathcal{C}(A) with s<ts<t. Then s=βˆ‘m∈N(bmβˆ’am)s=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}(b_{m}-a_{m}) for some cover (a,b)(a,b) of AA (Total Lengths of Covers by Open Intervals: the Set of Them and the Map of Their Infima (i)).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…