TheoremBase

Proof

Write m=min⁡{a,b}m=\min\{a,b\} and M=max⁡{a,b}M=\max\{a,b\}. Throughout we use the reflexivity, antisymmetry, transitivity, and comparability axioms of a total order. By comparability, either a≤ba\le b holds or it fails; we treat the two cases separately, and in each case the value of mm is read off from Minimum of Two Elements of a Totally Ordered Set and the value of MM from Maximum of Two Elements of a Totally Ordered Set.

Case 1: a≤ba\le b. Then m=am=a and M=bM=b.

1. Reflexivity gives a≤aa\le a, so m≤am\le a; and m=a≤bm=a\le b by the case hypothesis.

2. m=am=a.

3. Suppose c≤mc\le m. Then c≤ac\le a, and transitivity with a≤ba\le b gives c≤bc\le b. Conversely, if c≤ac\le a and c≤bc\le b, then in particular c≤a=mc\le a=m.

4. Apply Minimum of Two Elements of a Totally Ordered Set to the ordered pair (b,a)(b,a). If b≤ab\le a, then min⁡{b,a}=b\min\{b,a\}=b; combining b≤ab\le a with the case hypothesis a≤ba\le b, antisymmetry gives a=ba=b, so min⁡{b,a}=b=a=m\min\{b,a\}=b=a=m. If instead b≤ab\le a fails, then min⁡{b,a}=a=m\min\{b,a\}=a=m.

5. m=a≤b=Mm=a\le b=M by the case hypothesis.

Case 2: a≤ba\le b fails. By comparability, b≤ab\le a. Then m=bm=b and M=aM=a.

1. m=b≤am=b\le a, and reflexivity gives b≤bb\le b, so m≤bm\le b.

2. m=bm=b.

3. Suppose c≤mc\le m. Then c≤bc\le b, and transitivity with b≤ab\le a gives c≤ac\le a. Conversely, if c≤ac\le a and c≤bc\le b, then in particular c≤b=mc\le b=m.

4. Since b≤ab\le a, applying Minimum of Two Elements of a Totally Ordered Set to the ordered pair (b,a)(b,a) gives min⁡{b,a}=b=m\min\{b,a\}=b=m.

5. m=b≤a=Mm=b\le a=M.

In both cases all five claims hold, which completes the proof.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…