TheoremBase

Sketch: everything is reduced to the real and imaginary parts through the component bounds for the modulus, and then to the corresponding facts about real sequences.

Proof

Routine facts are used without comment (Routine Facts, Continued: Typed Arithmetic, Maps and Predicativity), and throughout, the results on real sequences cited below are read in the current definitions of sequences, convergence and Cauchy sequences, by The Earlier and the New Versions of the Definitions of Sequences, Limits, Cauchy Sequences, Series and Iterated Operations Agree (i), The Earlier and the New Versions of the Definitions of Sequences, Limits, Cauchy Sequences, Series and Iterated Operations Agree (ii) and The Earlier and the New Versions of the Definitions of Sequences, Limits, Cauchy Sequences, Series and Iterated Operations Agree (iv); the results on conjugates and moduli cited below are read for the current complex numbers, conjugate and modulus, by The Earlier and the New Versions of the Definitions of the Natural Numbers, the Complex Numbers, the Conjugate and the Modulus Agree, and the Two Versions of Real Correspond (ii), The Earlier and the New Versions of the Definitions of the Natural Numbers, the Complex Numbers, the Conjugate and the Modulus Agree, and the Two Versions of Real Correspond (iii) and The Earlier and the New Versions of the Definitions of the Natural Numbers, the Complex Numbers, the Conjugate and the Modulus Agree, and the Two Versions of Real Correspond (iv); and Cauchy sequences in a metric space are read in the current definition of metric spaces, by The Earlier and the New Versions of the Definitions of Metric Spaces, Convergence, Continuity and Compactness Agree (i).

Parts of differences. Everything below is reduced to real sequences through the real and imaginary parts, and the reduction rests on two facts about a difference zβˆ’wz-w of complex numbers. First, the parts are additive and commute with real scalars, by Conjugation and Modulus of Complex Numbers: Field Automorphism, Real and Imaginary Parts, Multiplicativity, Inverses, Component Bounds, Triangle Inequalities and Finite Sums (ii); writing zβˆ’w=z+(βˆ’1)wz-w=z+(-1)w, this gives

Re⁑(zβˆ’w)=Re⁑zβˆ’Re⁑w,Im⁑(zβˆ’w)=Im⁑zβˆ’Im⁑w.\operatorname{Re}(z-w)=\operatorname{Re}z-\operatorname{Re}w,\qquad\operatorname{Im}(z-w)=\operatorname{Im}z-\operatorname{Im}w .

Second, the modulus is controlled by the parts and controls them, by Conjugation and Modulus of Complex Numbers: Field Automorphism, Real and Imaginary Parts, Multiplicativity, Inverses, Component Bounds, Triangle Inequalities and Finite Sums (vi) applied to zβˆ’wz-w:

∣Re⁑(zβˆ’w)βˆ£β‰€βˆ£zβˆ’w∣,∣Im⁑(zβˆ’w)βˆ£β‰€βˆ£zβˆ’w∣,∣zβˆ’wβˆ£β‰€βˆ£Re⁑(zβˆ’w)∣+∣Im⁑(zβˆ’w)∣.|\operatorname{Re}(z-w)|\le|z-w|,\qquad|\operatorname{Im}(z-w)|\le|z-w|,\qquad|z-w|\le|\operatorname{Re}(z-w)|+|\operatorname{Im}(z-w)| .

Real and imaginary parts. We prove (ii). Suppose first that znβ†’wz_{n}\to w, and let Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0. By Convergent Sequences of Complex Numbers (i) there is N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with ∣znβˆ’w∣<Ξ΅|z_{n}-w|<\varepsilon for every nβ‰₯Nn\ge N, and then, for the same nn, the first two inequalities above give

∣Re⁑znβˆ’Re⁑w∣=∣Re⁑(znβˆ’w)βˆ£β‰€βˆ£znβˆ’w∣<Ξ΅,|\operatorname{Re}z_{n}-\operatorname{Re}w|=|\operatorname{Re}(z_{n}-w)|\le|z_{n}-w|<\varepsilon,

and likewise ∣Im⁑znβˆ’Im⁑w∣<Ξ΅|\operatorname{Im}z_{n}-\operatorname{Im}w|<\varepsilon. So the same NN serves in Convergent Sequences of Real Numbers (i) for both Re⁑znβ†’Re⁑w\operatorname{Re}z_{n}\to\operatorname{Re}w and Im⁑znβ†’Im⁑w\operatorname{Im}z_{n}\to\operatorname{Im}w. Conversely, suppose that Re⁑znβ†’Re⁑w\operatorname{Re}z_{n}\to\operatorname{Re}w and Im⁑znβ†’Im⁑w\operatorname{Im}z_{n}\to\operatorname{Im}w, and let Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0. Choose N1N_{1} with ∣Re⁑znβˆ’Re⁑w∣<Ξ΅/2|\operatorname{Re}z_{n}-\operatorname{Re}w|<\varepsilon/2 for nβ‰₯N1n\ge N_{1}, then N2N_{2} with ∣Im⁑znβˆ’Im⁑w∣<Ξ΅/2|\operatorname{Im}z_{n}-\operatorname{Im}w|<\varepsilon/2 for nβ‰₯N2n\ge N_{2}, and put N=max⁑(N1,N2)N=\max(N_{1},N_{2}). For nβ‰₯Nn\ge N the third inequality above gives

∣znβˆ’wβˆ£β‰€βˆ£Re⁑znβˆ’Re⁑w∣+∣Im⁑znβˆ’Im⁑w∣<Ξ΅2+Ξ΅2=Ξ΅,|z_{n}-w|\le|\operatorname{Re}z_{n}-\operatorname{Re}w|+|\operatorname{Im}z_{n}-\operatorname{Im}w|<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}=\varepsilon,

so zn→wz_{n}\to w.

Uniqueness. For (i), let znβ†’wz_{n}\to w and znβ†’wβ€²z_{n}\to w'. By (ii), (Re⁑zn)(\operatorname{Re}z_{n}) converges to both Re⁑w\operatorname{Re}w and Re⁑wβ€²\operatorname{Re}w', so Re⁑w=Re⁑wβ€²\operatorname{Re}w=\operatorname{Re}w' by Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (ii); in the same way Im⁑w=Im⁑wβ€²\operatorname{Im}w=\operatorname{Im}w'; so w=wβ€²w=w', since a complex number is determined by its parts (Real and Imaginary Parts of a Complex Number (i)).

Arithmetic. For (iii), each statement is checked on the parts and transferred back by (ii). The constant sequence (Ξ»)(\lambda) has the constant sequences (Re⁑λ)(\operatorname{Re}\lambda) and (Im⁑λ)(\operatorname{Im}\lambda) as parts, which converge to Re⁑λ\operatorname{Re}\lambda and Im⁑λ\operatorname{Im}\lambda by Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (i); so (Ξ»)(\lambda) converges to Ξ»\lambda. Now let znβ†’wz_{n}\to w and unβ†’vu_{n}\to v, so that Re⁑znβ†’Re⁑w\operatorname{Re}z_{n}\to\operatorname{Re}w, Im⁑znβ†’Im⁑w\operatorname{Im}z_{n}\to\operatorname{Im}w, Re⁑unβ†’Re⁑v\operatorname{Re}u_{n}\to\operatorname{Re}v and Im⁑unβ†’Im⁑v\operatorname{Im}u_{n}\to\operatorname{Im}v by (ii). By Conjugation and Modulus of Complex Numbers: Field Automorphism, Real and Imaginary Parts, Multiplicativity, Inverses, Component Bounds, Triangle Inequalities and Finite Sums (ii), Re⁑(zn+un)=Re⁑zn+Re⁑un\operatorname{Re}(z_{n}+u_{n})=\operatorname{Re}z_{n}+\operatorname{Re}u_{n}, which converges to Re⁑w+Re⁑v=Re⁑(w+v)\operatorname{Re}w+\operatorname{Re}v=\operatorname{Re}(w+v) by Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (vi); the imaginary parts behave in the same way, so zn+unβ†’w+vz_{n}+u_{n}\to w+v by (ii). The same argument with the formulas for parts of differences shows znβˆ’unβ†’wβˆ’vz_{n}-u_{n}\to w-v. For products, write z=Re⁑z+(Im⁑z)iz=\operatorname{Re}z+(\operatorname{Im}z)i and u=Re⁑u+(Im⁑u)iu=\operatorname{Re}u+(\operatorname{Im}u)i; the product formula and the uniqueness of parts in The Complex Numbers, with the Real Numbers Identified with a Subset of the Complex Numbers (vii) give

Re⁑(zu)=Re⁑zRe⁑uβˆ’Im⁑zIm⁑u,Im⁑(zu)=Re⁑zIm⁑u+Im⁑zRe⁑u.\operatorname{Re}(zu)=\operatorname{Re}z\operatorname{Re}u-\operatorname{Im}z\operatorname{Im}u,\qquad\operatorname{Im}(zu)=\operatorname{Re}z\operatorname{Im}u+\operatorname{Im}z\operatorname{Re}u .

Applying this to znunz_{n}u_{n} and using the rules for products, sums and differences in Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (vi), Re⁑(znun)β†’Re⁑wRe⁑vβˆ’Im⁑wIm⁑v=Re⁑(wv)\operatorname{Re}(z_{n}u_{n})\to\operatorname{Re}w\operatorname{Re}v-\operatorname{Im}w\operatorname{Im}v=\operatorname{Re}(wv) and Im⁑(znun)β†’Im⁑(wv)\operatorname{Im}(z_{n}u_{n})\to\operatorname{Im}(wv); hence znunβ†’wvz_{n}u_{n}\to wv by (ii).

Real sequences. For (iv), let y∈Ry\in\mathbb{R}. Then ΞΉ(y)=y+0i\iota(y)=y+0i, so Re⁑ι(y)=y\operatorname{Re}\iota(y)=y and Im⁑ι(y)=0\operatorname{Im}\iota(y)=0 (Real and Imaginary Parts of a Complex Number (i)). Thus the parts of (ΞΉ(xn))(\iota(x_{n})) are (xn)(x_{n}) and the constant sequence 00, and those of ΞΉ(x)\iota(x) are xx and 00. By (ii), ΞΉ(xn)β†’ΞΉ(x)\iota(x_{n})\to\iota(x) if and only if xnβ†’xx_{n}\to x and the constant sequence 00 tends to 00; the latter always holds, by Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (i), so ΞΉ(xn)β†’ΞΉ(x)\iota(x_{n})\to\iota(x) if and only if xnβ†’xx_{n}\to x.

Conjugates and moduli. For (v), let znβ†’wz_{n}\to w. For z∈Cz\in\mathbb{C}, The Complex Conjugate of a Complex Number (i) gives zβ€Ύ=Re⁑z+(βˆ’Im⁑z)i\overline{z}=\operatorname{Re}z+(-\operatorname{Im}z)i, so, by the uniqueness in The Complex Numbers, with the Real Numbers Identified with a Subset of the Complex Numbers (vii),

Re⁑zβ€Ύ=Re⁑z,Im⁑zβ€Ύ=βˆ’Im⁑z.\operatorname{Re}\overline{z}=\operatorname{Re}z,\qquad\operatorname{Im}\overline{z}=-\operatorname{Im}z .

Hence Re⁑znβ€Ύ=Re⁑znβ†’Re⁑w=Re⁑wβ€Ύ\operatorname{Re}\overline{z_{n}}=\operatorname{Re}z_{n}\to\operatorname{Re}w=\operatorname{Re}\overline{w}, and Im⁑znβ€Ύ=βˆ’Im⁑znβ†’βˆ’Im⁑w=Im⁑wβ€Ύ\operatorname{Im}\overline{z_{n}}=-\operatorname{Im}z_{n}\to-\operatorname{Im}w=\operatorname{Im}\overline{w} by the rule for negatives in Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (vi); so znβ€Ύβ†’wβ€Ύ\overline{z_{n}}\to\overline{w} by (ii). For the moduli, the reverse triangle inequality of Conjugation and Modulus of Complex Numbers: Field Automorphism, Real and Imaginary Parts, Multiplicativity, Inverses, Component Bounds, Triangle Inequalities and Finite Sums (vii) gives

∣∣znβˆ£βˆ’βˆ£wβˆ£βˆ£β‰€βˆ£znβˆ’w∣.\big||z_{n}|-|w|\big|\le|z_{n}-w| .

Given Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0, the NN that Convergent Sequences of Complex Numbers (i) provides for znβ†’wz_{n}\to w therefore gives ∣∣znβˆ£βˆ’βˆ£w∣∣<Ξ΅\big||z_{n}|-|w|\big|<\varepsilon for nβ‰₯Nn\ge N, which is ∣znβˆ£β†’βˆ£w∣|z_{n}|\to|w| in the sense of Convergent Sequences of Real Numbers (i).

The Cauchy criterion. For (vi), suppose first that (zn)(z_{n}) is convergent, say znβ†’wz_{n}\to w (Convergent Sequences of Complex Numbers (ii)), and let Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0. Choose NN with ∣znβˆ’w∣<Ξ΅/2|z_{n}-w|<\varepsilon/2 for nβ‰₯Nn\ge N. For m,nβ‰₯Nm,n\ge N, the triangle inequality of Conjugation and Modulus of Complex Numbers: Field Automorphism, Real and Imaginary Parts, Multiplicativity, Inverses, Component Bounds, Triangle Inequalities and Finite Sums (vii), together with ∣wβˆ’zn∣=βˆ£βˆ’(znβˆ’w)∣=∣znβˆ’w∣|w-z_{n}|=|-(z_{n}-w)|=|z_{n}-w| from Conjugation and Modulus of Complex Numbers: Field Automorphism, Real and Imaginary Parts, Multiplicativity, Inverses, Component Bounds, Triangle Inequalities and Finite Sums (iii), gives

∣zmβˆ’znβˆ£β‰€βˆ£zmβˆ’w∣+∣wβˆ’zn∣<Ξ΅2+Ξ΅2=Ξ΅.|z_{m}-z_{n}|\le|z_{m}-w|+|w-z_{n}|<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}=\varepsilon .

Conversely, suppose the condition of (vi) holds. Given Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0, its NN also gives, by the inequalities for parts of differences,

∣Re⁑zmβˆ’Re⁑znβˆ£β‰€βˆ£zmβˆ’zn∣<Ξ΅,∣Im⁑zmβˆ’Im⁑znβˆ£β‰€βˆ£zmβˆ’zn∣<Ξ΅(m,nβ‰₯N),|\operatorname{Re}z_{m}-\operatorname{Re}z_{n}|\le|z_{m}-z_{n}|<\varepsilon,\qquad|\operatorname{Im}z_{m}-\operatorname{Im}z_{n}|\le|z_{m}-z_{n}|<\varepsilon\qquad(m,n\ge N),

so (Re⁑zn)(\operatorname{Re}z_{n}) and (Im⁑zn)(\operatorname{Im}z_{n}) are Cauchy sequences in R\mathbb{R}. By Completeness of the Real Numbers for Sequences: Monotone Convergence, the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem and Cauchy Sequences (v) they converge, to some a∈Ra\in\mathbb{R} and b∈Rb\in\mathbb{R} respectively. Put w=a+biw=a+bi; then Re⁑w=a\operatorname{Re}w=a and Im⁑w=b\operatorname{Im}w=b by Real and Imaginary Parts of a Complex Number (i), so znβ†’wz_{n}\to w by (ii), and (zn)(z_{n}) is convergent.

The modulus metric. For (vii), recall that dC(z,w)=∣zβˆ’w∣d_{\mathbb{C}}(z,w)=|z-w| for all z,w∈Cz,w\in\mathbb{C}, by Metric Spaces: Balls, the Metric Topology, and the Real and Complex Numbers as Metric Spaces (v). Hence, for every Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0 and every N∈NN\in\mathbb{N}, the condition dC(zn,w)<Ξ΅d_{\mathbb{C}}(z_{n},w)<\varepsilon for all nβ‰₯Nn\ge N in Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space (i) is the condition ∣znβˆ’w∣<Ξ΅|z_{n}-w|<\varepsilon for all nβ‰₯Nn\ge N in Convergent Sequences of Complex Numbers (i), so the two notions of convergence to ww coincide. Likewise the condition dC(zm,zn)<Ξ΅d_{\mathbb{C}}(z_{m},z_{n})<\varepsilon for all m,nβ‰₯Nm,n\ge N in Cauchy Sequence in a Metric Space (i) is the condition ∣zmβˆ’zn∣<Ξ΅|z_{m}-z_{n}|<\varepsilon for all m,nβ‰₯Nm,n\ge N in (vi), for the same Ξ΅\varepsilon and NN, so (zn)(z_{n}) satisfies the condition of (vi) exactly when it is a Cauchy sequence in (C,dC)(\mathbb{C},d_{\mathbb{C}}).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…