TheoremBase

Sketch: approach z along real increments inside a ball contained in U and compare the two limits.

Proof

Routine facts about real and complex numbers are used without comment (Routine Facts, Continued: Typed Arithmetic, Maps and Predicativity).

A ball inside UU. Since UU is open, there is a real number r>0r>0 such that the open ball BdC(z,r)B_{d_{\mathbb{C}}}(z,r) is contained in UU (Open Subset of a Metric Space (i), Open Ball in a Metric Space (i), with dCd_{\mathbb{C}} as in Metric Spaces: Balls, the Metric Topology, and the Real and Complex Numbers as Metric Spaces (v)); that is, every w∈Cw\in\mathbb{C} with ∣w−z∣<r|w-z|<r lies in UU.

A point close to zz. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0; we choose in this order. First take δL>0\delta_{L}>0 from the hypothesis for N=LN=L and δM>0\delta_{M}>0 from the hypothesis for N=MN=M, both for this ε\varepsilon, and let δ=min⁡(δL,δM)\delta=\min(\delta_{L},\delta_{M}). Then put

t=12min⁡(r,δ),w=z+t.t=\tfrac{1}{2}\min(r,\delta),\qquad w=z+t .

The modulus of the real number tt is its absolute value (Metric Spaces: Balls, the Metric Topology, and the Real and Complex Numbers as Metric Spaces (v)), so 0<∣w−z∣=t<min⁡(r,δ)0<|w-z|=t<\min(r,\delta). In particular w∈Uw\in U by the choice of rr, and 0<∣w−z∣<δL0<|w-z|<\delta_{L} and 0<∣w−z∣<δM0<|w-z|<\delta_{M}.

Comparing LL and MM. Let

Q=f(w)−f(z)w−z.Q=\frac{f(w)-f(z)}{w-z}.

By the choice of δL\delta_{L} and δM\delta_{M} we have ∣Q−L∣<ε|Q-L|<\varepsilon and ∣Q−M∣<ε|Q-M|<\varepsilon, and the triangle inequality (Conjugation and Modulus of Complex Numbers: Field Automorphism, Real and Imaginary Parts, Multiplicativity, Inverses, Component Bounds, Triangle Inequalities and Finite Sums (vii)) gives

∣L−M∣≤∣Q−L∣+∣Q−M∣<2ε.|L-M|\le|Q-L|+|Q-M|<2\varepsilon .

Thus ∣L−M∣<2ε|L-M|<2\varepsilon for every real ε>0\varepsilon>0.

Conclusion. Suppose that L≠ML\neq M. Then ∣L−M∣>0|L-M|>0 (Conjugation and Modulus of Complex Numbers: Field Automorphism, Real and Imaginary Parts, Multiplicativity, Inverses, Component Bounds, Triangle Inequalities and Finite Sums (iii)), and the choice ε=∣L−M∣/2\varepsilon=|L-M|/2 in the previous paragraph gives ∣L−M∣<∣L−M∣|L-M|<|L-M|, a contradiction. Hence L=ML=M.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…