TheoremBase

Everything is read off the action and the bilinear form of a block matrix: the quadratic form of JJ at ι(ξ,η)\iota(\xi,\eta) is ∥ξ−η∥2\lVert\xi-\eta\rVert^{2}, and the matrix identities are obtained by comparing quadratic forms and invoking that a symmetric matrix is determined by its quadratic form.

Proof

Throughout, nn, JJ, ξ\xi, η\eta, XX, YY, aa and cc are as in the statement, and we write z=ι(ξ,η)z=\iota(\xi,\eta).

Conventions. We use without further comment that ≤\le on R\mathbb{R} is transitive and compatible with addition, by the ordered field axioms and Total Order on a Set, and the following weak compatibility with multiplication: if 0≤b0\le b and s≤ts\le t, then sb≤tbsb\le tb; this is immediate when b=0b=0 or s=ts=t, and otherwise follows from claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. We use that ∣−1∣=1|-1|=1 and, for positive aa, that ∣a∣=a|a|=a: by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field the value ∣x∣|x| equals xx or −x-x and is nonnegative, while 0<10<1 by claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and −1<0-1<0, respectively −a<0-a<0, by claim 4 of that lemma; the case ∣−1∣=∣1∣|-1|=|1| being covered by claim 2 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. Recall from Euclidean Space and Real Matrices: Standing Notation (iv) that P⪯QP\preceq Q means w⋅(Pw)≤w⋅(Qw)w\cdot(Pw)\le w\cdot(Qw) for every w∈R2nw\in\mathbb{R}^{2n}, and from Euclidean Space and Real Matrices: Standing Notation (vii) that ι\iota is a bijection, so that every w∈R2nw\in\mathbb{R}^{2n} is of the form ι(ξ,η)\iota(\xi,\eta).

Claim 1. By construction JJ is the block matrix determined by A=InA=I_{n}, B=−InB=-I_{n}, C=−InC=-I_{n} and D=InD=I_{n}. By claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Transpose of a Real Matrix we have In⊤=InI_{n}^{\top}=I_{n}, and hence (−In)⊤=(−1)In⊤=−In(-I_{n})^{\top}=(-1)I_{n}^{\top}=-I_{n} by claim 2 of that lemma. Thus A=A⊤A=A^{\top}, D=D⊤D=D^{\top} and C=B⊤C=B^{\top}, so JJ is symmetric by claim 3 of Action and Quadratic Form of a Block Matrix; that is, J∈S(2n)J\in\mathcal{S}(2n).

By claim 1 of Action and Quadratic Form of a Block Matrix,

J ι(ξ,η)=ι(Inξ+(−In)η, (−In)ξ+Inη).J\,\iota(\xi,\eta)=\iota\bigl(I_{n}\xi+(-I_{n})\eta,\ (-I_{n})\xi+I_{n}\eta\bigr).

Here Inξ=ξI_{n}\xi=\xi and Inη=ηI_{n}\eta=\eta by claim 2 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum, while (−In)η=(−1)(Inη)=−η(-I_{n})\eta=(-1)(I_{n}\eta)=-\eta and (−In)ξ=−ξ(-I_{n})\xi=-\xi by claim 1 of that lemma; and ξ+(−η)=ξ−η\xi+(-\eta)=\xi-\eta, η+(−ξ)=η−ξ\eta+(-\xi)=\eta-\xi. Hence J ι(ξ,η)=ι(ξ−η,η−ξ)J\,\iota(\xi,\eta)=\iota(\xi-\eta,\eta-\xi). Taking η=ξ\eta=\xi and using ξ−ξ=0Rn\xi-\xi=0_{\mathbb{R}^{n}} gives J ι(ξ,ξ)=ι(0Rn,0Rn)=0R2nJ\,\iota(\xi,\xi)=\iota\bigl(0_{\mathbb{R}^{n}},0_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\bigr)=0_{\mathbb{R}^{2n}}, the last equality by Concatenation and the Sup-Convolution of a Sum in Separated Variables (i).

Claim 2. By claim 2 of Action and Quadratic Form of a Block Matrix, applied with ξ′=ξ\xi'=\xi and η′=η\eta'=\eta, together with claims 1 and 2 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum and claim 5 of The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite,

z⋅(Jz)=ξ⋅(Inξ)+ξ⋅((−In)η)+η⋅((−In)ξ)+η⋅(Inη)=ξ⋅ξ−ξ⋅η−η⋅ξ+η⋅η.z\cdot(Jz)=\xi\cdot(I_{n}\xi)+\xi\cdot\bigl((-I_{n})\eta\bigr)+\eta\cdot\bigl((-I_{n})\xi\bigr)+\eta\cdot(I_{n}\eta)=\xi\cdot\xi-\xi\cdot\eta-\eta\cdot\xi+\eta\cdot\eta .

On the other hand, by claim 1 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square and claims 3 and 5 of The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite,

∥ξ−η∥2=(ξ−η)⋅(ξ−η)=ξ⋅ξ−η⋅ξ−ξ⋅η+η⋅η.\lVert\xi-\eta\rVert^{2}=(\xi-\eta)\cdot(\xi-\eta)=\xi\cdot\xi-\eta\cdot\xi-\xi\cdot\eta+\eta\cdot\eta .

The two right-hand sides coincide, which proves claim 2.

Claim 3. Let w=ι(ξ,η)∈R2nw=\iota(\xi,\eta)\in\mathbb{R}^{2n}. Since 02n=0 I2n0_{2n}=0\,I_{2n}, both matrices having all entries 00, Vector, Entry and Comparison Bounds for the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix (vi) gives w⋅(02nw)=0 ∥w∥2=0w\cdot(0_{2n}w)=0\,\lVert w\rVert^{2}=0, while w⋅(Jw)=∥ξ−η∥2w\cdot(Jw)=\lVert\xi-\eta\rVert^{2} is nonnegative by claim 1 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. Hence 02n⪯J0_{2n}\preceq J.

By claim 1 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square and claims 1 and 5 of The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite, the computation of claim 2 reads ∥ξ−η∥2=∥ξ∥2+∥η∥2−2(ξ⋅η)\lVert\xi-\eta\rVert^{2}=\lVert\xi\rVert^{2}+\lVert\eta\rVert^{2}-2(\xi\cdot\eta), where 2=1+12=1+1. Applying A Weighted Young Inequality and the Splitting of a Quadratic Form (i) with t=1t=1 to the pair ξ\xi and −η-\eta, and using ξ⋅(−η)=−(ξ⋅η)\xi\cdot(-\eta)=-(\xi\cdot\eta) from claim 5 of The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite and ∥−η∥=∥η∥\lVert-\eta\rVert=\lVert\eta\rVert from claim 5 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square, we get −2(ξ⋅η)≤∥ξ∥2+∥η∥2-2(\xi\cdot\eta)\le\lVert\xi\rVert^{2}+\lVert\eta\rVert^{2}. Therefore

w⋅(Jw)=∥ξ−η∥2≤2(∥ξ∥2+∥η∥2)=2∥w∥2=w⋅((2I2n)w),w\cdot(Jw)=\lVert\xi-\eta\rVert^{2}\le 2\bigl(\lVert\xi\rVert^{2}+\lVert\eta\rVert^{2}\bigr)=2\lVert w\rVert^{2}=w\cdot\bigl((2I_{2n})w\bigr),

by claim 3 of Concatenation Identifies a Product of Euclidean Spaces with a Euclidean Space and Vector, Entry and Comparison Bounds for the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix (vi). Hence J⪯2I2nJ\preceq 2I_{2n}.

Finally w⋅((−2I2n)w)=−2∥w∥2≤0=w⋅(02nw)w\cdot\bigl((-2I_{2n})w\bigr)=-2\lVert w\rVert^{2}\le 0=w\cdot(0_{2n}w), since 0≤2∥w∥20\le 2\lVert w\rVert^{2} and hence −2∥w∥2≤0-2\lVert w\rVert^{2}\le 0 by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; so −2I2n⪯02n⪯J⪯2I2n-2I_{2n}\preceq 0_{2n}\preceq J\preceq 2I_{2n}, and claim 3 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix, applicable because 0≤20\le 2, gives ∥J∥≤2\lVert J\rVert\le 2.

Claim 4. The matrix J2J^{2} lies in S(2n)\mathcal{S}(2n) by Vector, Entry and Comparison Bounds for the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix (ii), and 2J∈S(2n)2J\in\mathcal{S}(2n) by Euclidean Space and Real Matrices: Standing Notation (iii). Let w=ι(ξ,η)w=\iota(\xi,\eta). By Vector, Entry and Comparison Bounds for the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix (ii), claim 1 above and claim 3 of Concatenation Identifies a Product of Euclidean Spaces with a Euclidean Space,

w⋅(J2w)=∥Jw∥2=∥ι(ξ−η,η−ξ)∥2=∥ξ−η∥2+∥η−ξ∥2=2∥ξ−η∥2,w\cdot(J^{2}w)=\lVert Jw\rVert^{2}=\lVert\iota(\xi-\eta,\eta-\xi)\rVert^{2}=\lVert\xi-\eta\rVert^{2}+\lVert\eta-\xi\rVert^{2}=2\lVert\xi-\eta\rVert^{2},

since η−ξ=(−1)(ξ−η)\eta-\xi=(-1)(\xi-\eta) in the real vector space Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} of Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space and hence ∥η−ξ∥=∥ξ−η∥\lVert\eta-\xi\rVert=\lVert\xi-\eta\rVert by claim 5 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square. On the other hand, by claim 1 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum, claim 5 of The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite and claim 2,

w⋅((2J)w)=2(w⋅(Jw))=2∥ξ−η∥2.w\cdot\bigl((2J)w\bigr)=2\bigl(w\cdot(Jw)\bigr)=2\lVert\xi-\eta\rVert^{2}.

The quadratic forms of J2J^{2} and 2J2J therefore agree at every point of R2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}, so J2=2JJ^{2}=2J by A Symmetric Matrix is Determined by its Quadratic Form, and a Second-Order Expansion by its Coefficients (i).

Claim 5. That aJ∈S(2n)aJ\in\mathcal{S}(2n) is Euclidean Space and Real Matrices: Standing Notation (iii). By claim 5 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix and claim 3, ∥aJ∥=∣a∣ ∥J∥=a∥J∥≤2a\lVert aJ\rVert=|a|\,\lVert J\rVert=a\lVert J\rVert\le 2a.

Since J⪯2I2nJ\preceq 2I_{2n} by claim 3 and 3a3a is nonnegative, the compatibility of ⪯\preceq with multiplication by a nonnegative real number, recorded in Euclidean Space and Real Matrices: Standing Notation (iv), gives 3aJ⪯3a(2I2n)3aJ\preceq 3a(2I_{2n}); and 3a(2I2n)=6aI2n3a(2I_{2n})=6aI_{2n}, the two matrices having the same entries. Hence 3aJ⪯6aI2n3aJ\preceq 6aI_{2n}.

For the last identity, note first that aJ+a−1(aJ)2aJ+a^{-1}(aJ)^{2} and 3aJ3aJ both lie in S(2n)\mathcal{S}(2n), by Vector, Entry and Comparison Bounds for the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix (ii) and Euclidean Space and Real Matrices: Standing Notation (iii). Let w=ι(ξ,η)w=\iota(\xi,\eta) and put q=w⋅(Jw)=∥ξ−η∥2q=w\cdot(Jw)=\lVert\xi-\eta\rVert^{2}. By claim 1 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum and claim 5 of The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite, w⋅((aJ)w)=aqw\cdot\bigl((aJ)w\bigr)=aq. Moreover (aJ)w=a(Jw)(aJ)w=a(Jw) by claim 1 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum, so by claim 5 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square and the computation of claim 4,

w⋅((aJ)2w)=∥(aJ)w∥2=a2∥Jw∥2=2a2q,w\cdot\bigl((aJ)^{2}w\bigr)=\lVert(aJ)w\rVert^{2}=a^{2}\lVert Jw\rVert^{2}=2a^{2}q,

using Vector, Entry and Comparison Bounds for the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix (ii) for the first equality. Consequently, again by claim 1 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum and claim 5 of The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite,

w⋅((aJ+a−1(aJ)2)w)=aq+a−1(2a2q)=aq+2aq=3aq=w⋅((3aJ)w),w\cdot\Bigl(\bigl(aJ+a^{-1}(aJ)^{2}\bigr)w\Bigr)=aq+a^{-1}\bigl(2a^{2}q\bigr)=aq+2aq=3aq=w\cdot\bigl((3aJ)w\bigr),

since a−1a2=aa^{-1}a^{2}=a in the field R\mathbb{R}. As ww was arbitrary, A Symmetric Matrix is Determined by its Quadratic Form, and a Second-Order Expansion by its Coefficients (i) gives aJ+a−1(aJ)2=3aJaJ+a^{-1}(aJ)^{2}=3aJ.

Claim 6. Assume X⊕(−Y)⪯cJX\oplus(-Y)\preceq cJ and let ξ∈Rn\xi\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. Put w=ι(ξ,ξ)w=\iota(\xi,\xi). By Block Diagonal Symmetric Matrices and the Blocks of a Symmetric Matrix (ii), claim 1 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum and claim 5 of The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite,

w⋅((X⊕(−Y))w)=ξ⋅(Xξ)+ξ⋅((−Y)ξ)=ξ⋅(Xξ)−ξ⋅(Yξ).w\cdot\Bigl(\bigl(X\oplus(-Y)\bigr)w\Bigr)=\xi\cdot(X\xi)+\xi\cdot\bigl((-Y)\xi\bigr)=\xi\cdot(X\xi)-\xi\cdot(Y\xi).

By claim 2 and claim 3 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square, w⋅(Jw)=∥ξ−ξ∥2=0w\cdot(Jw)=\lVert\xi-\xi\rVert^{2}=0, so w⋅((cJ)w)=c(w⋅(Jw))=0w\cdot\bigl((cJ)w\bigr)=c\bigl(w\cdot(Jw)\bigr)=0 by claim 1 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum and claim 5 of The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite. The assumed inequality therefore reads ξ⋅(Xξ)−ξ⋅(Yξ)≤0\xi\cdot(X\xi)-\xi\cdot(Y\xi)\le 0, that is ξ⋅(Xξ)≤ξ⋅(Yξ)\xi\cdot(X\xi)\le\xi\cdot(Y\xi). As ξ∈Rn\xi\in\mathbb{R}^{n} was arbitrary, X⪯YX\preceq Y by Euclidean Space and Real Matrices: Standing Notation (iv).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…