Proof of Gluing Two Noncommutative Couplings along a Common Marginal
lemmalem:nc-gluing-couplings-2026aRealize both couplings in the amalgamated free product over the common marginal nu, take the vacuum law of the resulting 3d-tuple of operators, and check traciality by rotating letters one at a time.
Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. We adopt the setting of Noncommutative Laws, Couplings and the Wasserstein Distance: Standing Notation, together with the Hilbert space conventions of Complex Hilbert Spaces and Bounded Linear Maps: Standing Notation, and fix , , , and as in the statement.
Step 0 (the amalgamation data). By Couplings of Noncommutative Laws: the Norm Bound, the Cost Identity, the Tensor, Diagonal and Swapped Couplings, Weak-Star Closedness, and Displacement Interpolants §bound, and lie in , hence in by Noncommutative Laws of Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables with a Norm Bound §law. Put and , and let
-tuples in whose entries are variables and hence lie in by Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §self-adjoint. They are exactly the tuples defining the marginal substitutions in Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §marginals, so and , and Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling gives
Thus the data of Two Noncommutative Laws with a Common Marginal: Standing Notation for Their Amalgamated Free Product §data hold for . The letters clash: the common marginal, which that setting (and every result stated in it) calls , is here ; our plays no role in the amalgamation. With this renaming we use the notation of its algebras and its embeddings: acting on , acting on with trace , and the embeddings . Let , , and be the amalgamated free product space, its vacuum vector, its vacuum state and the actions, as in The Amalgamated Free Product of Two Noncommutative Laws over a Common Marginal: Representations, Amalgamation, Freeness and the Tracial Vacuum State; by The Amalgamated Free Product Space of Two Noncommutative Laws over a Common Marginal, Its Vacuum Vector and Vacuum State §state, for .
For let be the left multiplication operator of Left and Right Multiplication Operators on the Complex GNS Space of a Noncommutative Law: Boundedness, Algebra Rules, Adjoints, Commutation, the Vacuum and the Conjugation §multiplication on , and for let be the one on . By The Tracial Algebra of a Noncommutative Law: a Norm-Closed Unital *-Algebra with a Faithful Positive Trace, Determined by Vacuum Vectors, Closed under Square Roots §star-algebra, and . Since , Left and Right Multiplication Operators on the Complex GNS Space of a Noncommutative Law: Boundedness, Algebra Rules, Adjoints, Commutation, the Vacuum and the Conjugation §multiplication, with and in place of that lemma's and , gives for , and Left and Right Multiplication Operators on the Complex GNS Space of a Noncommutative Law: Boundedness, Algebra Rules, Adjoints, Commutation, the Vacuum and the Conjugation §adjoint together with (Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §adjoint) gives .
Step 1 (the operators). Define and by , for , and , for , and let be the -tuple in with . We claim that for . By Marginals of a Noncommutative Law: the Isometry of GNS Spaces, the Trace-Preserving Embedding of Tracial Algebras and the Conditional Expectation §homomorphism, applied with , , , in place of that lemma's , , , (its being our ), and Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §values,
Since , The Amalgamated Free Product of Two Noncommutative Laws over a Common Marginal: Representations, Amalgamation, Freeness and the Tracial Vacuum State §amalgamation gives . Consequently
Each is some with , so by The Amalgamated Free Product of Two Noncommutative Laws over a Common Marginal: Representations, Amalgamation, Freeness and the Tracial Vacuum State §representation and Step 0, and for every .
Step 2 (the glued state). By The Amalgamated Free Product of Two Noncommutative Laws over a Common Marginal: Representations, Amalgamation, Freeness and the Tracial Vacuum State §marginals, . By Step 1, The Law of a Tuple of Bounded Self-Adjoint Operators in a Tracial Vector State applies with , , in place of its , , ; let , so that for . To get from The Law of a Tuple of Bounded Self-Adjoint Operators in a Tracial Vector State §law we show for all . If then by Evaluation of Noncommutative Polynomials at a Tuple of Bounded Operators §word-products, and both sides equal ; likewise if . If are nonempty, then and by Evaluation of Noncommutative Polynomials at Bounded Operators: a Unital Homomorphism Compatible with Adjoints, Substitution, Representations and the GNS Multiplication Operators §values, so it suffices to prove
First, for a letter and a nonempty word of length with letters ,
Indeed, and by Evaluation of Noncommutative Polynomials at a Tuple of Bounded Operators §word-products, and , by Evaluation of Noncommutative Polynomials at Bounded Operators: a Unital Homomorphism Compatible with Adjoints, Substitution, Representations and the GNS Multiplication Operators §values. As composition is associative, is the product of factors and is the product of the same factors with the first one moved to the end, so (3) is The Amalgamated Free Product of Two Noncommutative Laws over a Common Marginal: Representations, Amalgamation, Freeness and the Tracial Vacuum State §trace with .
We prove (2) by induction on the length of , for all nonempty simultaneously. If , then is a letter by Basic Properties of Words: Associativity, Reversal, Finitely Many Factorisations, and Countability §last-letter, and (2) is (3). Suppose (2) holds for all words of length , and let have length . By Basic Properties of Words: Associativity, Reversal, Finitely Many Factorisations, and Countability §last-letter, with of length , hence nonempty. By Basic Properties of Words: Associativity, Reversal, Finitely Many Factorisations, and Countability §monoid, , the word is nonempty, with nonempty, and . The induction hypothesis (for and ) and then (3) (for and ) give
This proves (2), and hence by The Law of a Tuple of Bounded Self-Adjoint Operators in a Tracial Vector State §law.
Step 3 (the first and second pairs). Let and let , the tuple in defining . By Evaluation of Noncommutative Polynomials at Bounded Operators: a Unital Homomorphism Compatible with Adjoints, Substitution, Representations and the GNS Multiplication Operators §values, , so by Evaluation of Noncommutative Polynomials at Bounded Operators: a Unital Homomorphism Compatible with Adjoints, Substitution, Representations and the GNS Multiplication Operators §substitution and (1),
Apply Evaluation of Noncommutative Polynomials at Bounded Operators: a Unital Homomorphism Compatible with Adjoints, Substitution, Representations and the GNS Multiplication Operators §transport with , , , , , in place of its , , , , , : the set contains and every and is closed under sums, complex multiples and composition by The Tracial Algebra of a Noncommutative Law: a Norm-Closed Unital *-Algebra with a Faithful Positive Trace, Determined by Vacuum Vectors, Closed under Square Roots §star-algebra, and is linear, multiplicative and unital by The Amalgamated Free Product of Two Noncommutative Laws over a Common Marginal: Representations, Amalgamation, Freeness and the Tracial Vacuum State §representation. Together with Evaluation of Noncommutative Polynomials at Bounded Operators: a Unital Homomorphism Compatible with Adjoints, Substitution, Representations and the GNS Multiplication Operators §gns (for ), which gives , this yields . By The Amalgamated Free Product of Two Noncommutative Laws over a Common Marginal: Representations, Amalgamation, Freeness and the Tracial Vacuum State §marginals and The Tracial Algebra of a Noncommutative Law: a Norm-Closed Unital *-Algebra with a Faithful Positive Trace, Determined by Vacuum Vectors, Closed under Square Roots §trace,
Hence , which is claim 1. The same argument with the tuple defining , for which by (1), and with , , , in place of , , , , gives , which is claim 2.
Step 4 (the composite coupling). Write . It is linear, as is linear by The Law of a Tuple of Bounded Self-Adjoint Operators in a Tracial Vector State §state and is linear by Substitution of Noncommutative Polynomials into the Variables §substitution. The entries of the tuple defining are variables, hence self-adjoint by Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §self-adjoint. For , Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §values, Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §homomorphism and Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §adjoint give , and . Since is a tracial state (Noncommutative Laws of Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables with a Norm Bound §tracial-state), it follows that , that is real and nonnegative, and that ; so is a tracial state on .
For the marginals, apply Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §composition with as the inner substitution. For , the -th entries of the tuples defining and are both , so by Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §values ; hence and are both the substitution of in , and by claim 1 and Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling (for )
Likewise, with as the inner substitution: for the -th entries of the tuples defining and are both , so and are both the substitution of , and by claim 2 and Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling (for )
As , Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling gives , which is claim 3.
Loading…
Prerequisites
627ae68f-d55d-420a-a510-94f48c9ac7eb