Each clause is obtained by applying the two one-sided estimates of the cross-level comparison theorem with the bounded coarse solutions as intermediaries: a fine subsolution lies below composed with the mode restriction up to theta, which in turn lies below a fine supersolution up to theta. Letting theta tend to zero gives comparison, applying it both ways gives uniqueness, and using a fine solution on both sides gives uniform convergence on penalty sublevel sets and hence pointwise convergence.
Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.
Preliminaries. Let . By hypothesis is a viscosity solution of relative to , hence, by Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §solution taken at level , both a viscosity subsolution and a viscosity supersolution of relative to . Since for every , the two-sided bound Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field §two-sided gives and for every . Likewise, by Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §solution, a viscosity solution of relative to is both a viscosity subsolution and a viscosity supersolution of relative to . Finally, is a function from to by Noise Penalty Pairs on the Noise Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §pair, so is a real number for every , and for , as recorded in the statement, so that is defined.
Claim (comparison). Choose with and for every . Fix , put , and let with . The choices are made in this order. First, A Cross-Level Comparison Principle for First-Order Equations on a Fine Noise Wasserstein Space and a Family of Coarse Levels Linked by Mode Restrictions §fine-below, applied with the numbers , , and in place of its , , and , provides . Second, A Cross-Level Comparison Principle for First-Order Equations on a Fine Noise Wasserstein Space and a Family of Coarse Levels Linked by Mode Restrictions §coarse-below, applied with the numbers , , and in place of its , , and , provides . Let be the larger of and . Since , the first of these results, applied to the viscosity subsolution (bounded above by ) and to the viscosity supersolution of (bounded below by by the preliminaries), gives, because ,
Since , the second result, applied to the viscosity subsolution of (bounded above by ) and to the viscosity supersolution (bounded below by ), gives
Hence for every positive . If failed, then would be positive and the last inequality would give , which is false for the positive number . Therefore , and was arbitrary.
Claim (uniqueness). By the preliminaries, is a viscosity subsolution of relative to that is bounded above and is a viscosity supersolution of relative to that is bounded below, so claim 1 gives for every . Exchanging the roles of and , claim 1 gives . Hence for every .
Claim (convergence). Choose with for every , and let with . First, A Cross-Level Comparison Principle for First-Order Equations on a Fine Noise Wasserstein Space and a Family of Coarse Levels Linked by Mode Restrictions §fine-below, applied with , , and in place of its , , and , provides ; second, A Cross-Level Comparison Principle for First-Order Equations on a Fine Noise Wasserstein Space and a Family of Coarse Levels Linked by Mode Restrictions §coarse-below, applied with , , and , provides . Let be the larger of and , and let with and with . The first result, applied to the viscosity subsolution of (bounded above by ) and the viscosity supersolution of (bounded below by ), gives . The second result, applied to the viscosity subsolution of (bounded above by ) and the viscosity supersolution of (bounded below by ), gives . Thus , and the two-sided bound Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field §two-sided gives
Claim (pointwise). Let and let with . Apply claim 3 with , which is positive, and , to obtain . For every with , satisfies , so . By Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers, the sequence converges to .
Loading…