TheoremBase

Proof of Couplings of Noncommutative Laws: the Norm Bound, the Cost Identity, the Tensor, Diagonal and Swapped Couplings, Weak-Star Closedness, and Displacement Interpolants

lemmalem:nc-coupling-basic-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 21,053 chars · 25 deps · depth 15 Reason: Proof of the basic properties of couplings of noncommutative laws (Goal 4, T4).

Substitutions by self-adjoint tuples pull tracial states back to tracial states and compose, which yields the marginal and cost computations, while positivity of the tensor coupling follows from the Schur product of two positive semidefinite moment kernels and closedness from sequential weak-star compactness.

Proof

Items used. Definitions: The Algebra of Noncommutative Polynomials in Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables §polynomials, The Algebra of Noncommutative Polynomials in Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables §linear, The Algebra of Noncommutative Polynomials in Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables §monomials, Substitution of Noncommutative Polynomials into the Variables §word-products, Substitution of Noncommutative Polynomials into the Variables §substitution, Noncommutative Laws of Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables with a Norm Bound §tracial-state, Noncommutative Laws of Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables with a Norm Bound §norm-bound, Noncommutative Laws of Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables with a Norm Bound §law, Weak-Star Convergence of Noncommutative Laws §weak-star, Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §marginals, Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling, Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §cost, Positive Semidefinite Kernel on a Finite Set §kernel, Sum over a Finite Index Set, The Complex Numbers, Real and Imaginary Parts of a Complex Number, Subsequence of a Sequence in a Set. Results: Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §vector-space, Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §linear-extension, Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §monomials, Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §algebra, Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §adjoint, Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §self-adjoint; Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §values, Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §homomorphism, Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §adjoint, Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §composition, Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §identity; Basic Properties of Noncommutative Laws: Adjoints, the Self-Adjoint Pairing, Cauchy-Schwarz, Monotonicity in the Bound, and Laws of Constant Tuples §adjoint, Basic Properties of Noncommutative Laws: Adjoints, the Self-Adjoint Pairing, Cauchy-Schwarz, Monotonicity in the Bound, and Laws of Constant Tuples §pairing; The Norm Bound of a Noncommutative Law: Multiplication by a Variable is Bounded, the Bound is Detected by Even Moments, and Laws Pull Back under Self-Adjoint Substitutions §criterion, The Norm Bound of a Noncommutative Law: Multiplication by a Variable is Bounded, the Bound is Detected by Even Moments, and Laws Pull Back under Self-Adjoint Substitutions §affine; Sequential Weak-Star Compactness of the Noncommutative Laws with a Given Norm Bound §unique, Sequential Weak-Star Compactness of the Noncommutative Laws with a Given Norm Bound §compact; Positive Semidefinite Kernels on a Finite Set: Rank-One Decomposition and the Schur Product §schur; Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §vanishing, Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §conjugate, Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §pairs; claims 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7 of Properties of Finite Sums; claims 2, 3, 4 and 7 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors; claims 2 and 3 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets; claim 5 of Basic Properties of Initial Segments of the Natural Numbers; claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field; claims 1 and 8 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus; claims 2 and 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; claim 1 of Uniqueness of Limits and Boundedness of Convergent Real Sequences.

Throughout, xjx_{j} denotes the jj-th variable of whichever Pn\mathcal{P}_{n} is indicated, q2=qqq^{2}=qq, and for j∈[d]j\in[d] we put qj=xj−xd+jq_{j}=x_{j}-x_{d+j} and rj=xj+xd+jr_{j}=x_{j}+x_{d+j} in P2d\mathcal{P}_{2d}, so that Δd=∑j=1dqj2\Delta_{d}=\sum_{j=1}^{d}q_{j}^{2} by Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §cost. Since 2d=d+d2d=d+d, claim 5 of Basic Properties of Initial Segments of the Natural Numbers shows that every element of [2d][2d] is either some j∈[d]j\in[d] or d+kd+k for exactly one k∈[d]k\in[d], and j≠d+kj\neq d+k for j,k∈[d]j,k\in[d].

Step 0 (general facts). (F1) Polynomials are maps Wn→CW_{n}\to\mathbb{C} and the linear operations are pointwise (The Algebra of Noncommutative Polynomials in Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables §linear); hence an identity between linear combinations of polynomials (with no products) holds as soon as the corresponding identity of complex numbers holds at every word. In particular 0q=00q=0 for every q∈Pnq\in\mathcal{P}_{n}, since 0 q(w)=00\,q(w)=0 by claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field; and then, writing the zero polynomial as the scalar multiple c 0c\,0 with the scalar c=0∈Cc=0\in\mathbb{C} (coefficientwise, 0⋅0=00\cdot0=0 in C\mathbb{C}), q0=q(c 0)=c (q0)=0q0=q(c\,0)=c\,(q0)=0 by Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §algebra, the last equality because every coefficient of c (q0)c\,(q0) is 00 times a complex number.

(F2) By Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §self-adjoint, Pn,sa\mathcal{P}_{n,\mathrm{sa}} contains 11 and every variable and is closed under sums and real multiples. Hence qj=xj+(−1)xd+jq_{j}=x_{j}+(-1)x_{d+j}, rjr_{j}, and ajt=(1−t)xj+t xd+ja^{t}_{j}=(1-t)x_{j}+t\,x_{d+j} (for real tt) are self-adjoint, and every tuple substituted in this lemma (ι1,ι2,σ1,σ2,δ,s,σat\iota^{1},\iota^{2},\sigma^{1},\sigma^{2},\delta,s,\sigma_{a^{t}} and the two tuples of claim 7) consists of self-adjoint polynomials.

(F3) Let aa be an nn-tuple in Pm,sa\mathcal{P}_{m,\mathrm{sa}} and λ\lambda a tracial state on Pm\mathcal{P}_{m}. Then λ∘σa\lambda\circ\sigma_{a} is a tracial state on Pn\mathcal{P}_{n}. Indeed it is linear as a composite of linear maps (Substitution of Noncommutative Polynomials into the Variables §substitution); λ(σa(1))=λ(1)=1\lambda(\sigma_{a}(1))=\lambda(1)=1 by Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §values; for p,q∈Pnp,q\in\mathcal{P}_{n}, σa(p∗p)=σa(p)∗σa(p)\sigma_{a}(p^{*}p)=\sigma_{a}(p)^{*}\sigma_{a}(p) by Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §homomorphism and Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §adjoint, so λ(σa(p∗p))\lambda(\sigma_{a}(p^{*}p)) is real and nonnegative by (b) of Noncommutative Laws of Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables with a Norm Bound §tracial-state; and λ(σa(pq))=λ(σa(p)σa(q))=λ(σa(q)σa(p))=λ(σa(qp))\lambda(\sigma_{a}(pq))=\lambda(\sigma_{a}(p)\sigma_{a}(q))=\lambda(\sigma_{a}(q)\sigma_{a}(p))=\lambda(\sigma_{a}(qp)) by the homomorphism clause and (c).

(F4) If σa:Pn→Pm\sigma_{a}:\mathcal{P}_{n}\to\mathcal{P}_{m} and σb:Pm→Pl\sigma_{b}:\mathcal{P}_{m}\to\mathcal{P}_{l} are substitutions, then σb∘σa=σc\sigma_{b}\circ\sigma_{a}=\sigma_{c} with cj=σb(aj)c_{j}=\sigma_{b}(a_{j}), by Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §composition; when aj=xka_{j}=x_{k} we have cj=bkc_{j}=b_{k} by Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §values. If c=(x1,…,xn)c=(x_{1},\dots,x_{n}), then σc\sigma_{c} is the identity by Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §identity.

(F5) Let aa be an nn-tuple in Pm\mathcal{P}_{m} and w∈Wnw\in W_{n}. If every aja_{j} is a monomial, then σa(xw)=aw\sigma_{a}(x_{w})=a_{w} is a monomial; if every aja_{j} equals 11, then σa(xw)=1\sigma_{a}(x_{w})=1. Indeed σa(xw)=aw\sigma_{a}(x_{w})=a_{w} by Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §values; a∅=1=x∅a_{\varnothing}=1=x_{\varnothing}, and for ww of length kk, aw=π(k)a_{w}=\pi(k) with π(1)=aw1\pi(1)=a_{w_{1}} and π(i+1)=π(i)awi+1\pi(i+1)=\pi(i)a_{w_{i+1}} (Substitution of Noncommutative Polynomials into the Variables §word-products). By induction on i∈[k]i\in[k]: if π(i)=xu\pi(i)=x_{u} and awi+1=xva_{w_{i+1}}=x_{v}, then π(i+1)=xuv\pi(i+1)=x_{uv}; if π(i)=1=awi+1\pi(i)=1=a_{w_{i+1}}, then π(i+1)=1⋅1=1\pi(i+1)=1\cdot1=1 (both by Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §monomials).

(F6) For y∈Pmy\in\mathcal{P}_{m} and k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, yky^{k} is, as in The Norm Bound of a Noncommutative Law: Multiplication by a Variable is Bounded, the Bound is Detected by Even Moments, and Laws Pull Back under Self-Adjoint Substitutions, the product along the word ek∈W1e_{k}\in W_{1} of length kk all of whose letters are 11, for the 11-tuple (y)(y); so yk=σ(y)(xek)y^{k}=\sigma_{(y)}(x_{e_{k}}) by Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §values. For every substitution σb:Pm→Pl\sigma_{b}:\mathcal{P}_{m}\to\mathcal{P}_{l}, (F4) and the values clause give σb(yk)=σ(σb(y))(xek)=σb(y)k\sigma_{b}(y^{k})=\sigma_{(\sigma_{b}(y))}(x_{e_{k}})=\sigma_{b}(y)^{k}.

(F7) Two linear maps Pn→C\mathcal{P}_{n}\to\mathbb{C} agreeing on every monomial are equal, by the uniqueness in (a) of Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §linear-extension.

(F8) Let ℓ:Pn→C\ell:\mathcal{P}_{n}\to\mathbb{C} be linear, p∈Pnp\in\mathcal{P}_{n}, and FF a nonempty finite subset of WnW_{n} with supp⁡p⊆F\operatorname{supp}p\subseteq F. Then (i) ℓ(p)=∑w∈Fp(w) ℓ(xw)\ell(p)=\sum_{w\in F}p(w)\,\ell(x_{w}), and (ii) ℓ(p∗p)=∑(u,v)∈F×Fp(u)‾ p(v) ℓ(xu∗xv)\ell(p^{*}p)=\sum_{(u,v)\in F\times F}\overline{p(u)}\,p(v)\,\ell(x_{u}^{*}x_{v}). For (i): ℓ\ell is the unique linear map with ℓ(xw)=c(w):=ℓ(xw)\ell(x_{w})=c(w):=\ell(x_{w}), so the formula of (a) of Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §linear-extension applies. If p=0p=0, then ℓ(p)=0\ell(p)=0 and every term p(w)ℓ(xw)=0p(w)\ell(x_{w})=0 (claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field), so the sum over FF is 00 by Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §vanishing. If p≠0p\neq0, then ℓ(p)=∑w∈supp⁡pp(w)ℓ(xw)\ell(p)=\sum_{w\in\operatorname{supp}p}p(w)\ell(x_{w}) with supp⁡p\operatorname{supp}p nonempty, and the terms with w∈F∖supp⁡pw\in F\setminus\operatorname{supp}p vanish, so this equals the sum over FF by the same clause. For (ii): for fixed uu, q↦ℓ(xu∗q)q\mapsto\ell(x_{u}^{*}q) is linear by Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §algebra, so (i) gives ℓ(xu∗p)=∑v∈Fp(v) ℓ(xu∗xv)\ell(x_{u}^{*}p)=\sum_{v\in F}p(v)\,\ell(x_{u}^{*}x_{v}). The map r↦ℓ(r∗p)‾r\mapsto\overline{\ell(r^{*}p)} is linear: (r+r′)∗p=r∗p+r′∗p(r+r')^{*}p=r^{*}p+r'^{*}p and (cr)∗p=c‾ (r∗p)(cr)^{*}p=\overline{c}\,(r^{*}p) by Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §adjoint and Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §algebra, and conjugation is additive, multiplicative and involutive (claim 1 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus). So (i) gives ℓ(p∗p)‾=∑u∈Fp(u)ℓ(xu∗p)‾\overline{\ell(p^{*}p)}=\sum_{u\in F}p(u)\overline{\ell(x_{u}^{*}p)}; conjugating with Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §conjugate and claim 1 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus,

ℓ(p∗p)=∑u∈Fp(u)‾∑v∈Fp(v) ℓ(xu∗xv)=∑u∈F(∑v∈Fp(u)‾ p(v) ℓ(xu∗xv)),\ell(p^{*}p)=\sum_{u\in F}\overline{p(u)}\sum_{v\in F}p(v)\,\ell(x_{u}^{*}x_{v})=\sum_{u\in F}\Bigl(\sum_{v\in F}\overline{p(u)}\,p(v)\,\ell(x_{u}^{*}x_{v})\Bigr),

the constant being moved inside by Sum over a Finite Index Set and claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums; the iterated sum is the sum over F×FF\times F by Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §pairs with B(u)=FB(u)=F.

(F9) A finite sum in C\mathbb{C} of real numbers is real and equals their finite sum in R\mathbb{R}, by induction along the recursion of claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums and condition 1 of The Complex Numbers. By Real and Imaginary Parts of a Complex Number, every z∈Cz\in\mathbb{C} equals Re⁡z+(Im⁡z)i\operatorname{Re}z+(\operatorname{Im}z)i, and Re⁡z=z\operatorname{Re}z=z when zz is real (as z=z+0iz=z+0i).

Step 1 (claim 1). Let μ,ν∈Σd,R\mu,\nu\in\Sigma_{d,R} and γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu); γ\gamma is a tracial state on P2d\mathcal{P}_{2d} (Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling). Let m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}. For j∈[d]j\in[d], ι1(xj)=xj\iota^{1}(x_{j})=x_{j} by Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §values, so by (F6) ι1(xj2m)=xj2m\iota^{1}(x_{j}^{2m})=x_{j}^{2m} and γ(xj2m)=(γ∘ι1)(xj2m)=μ(xj2m)≤R2m\gamma(x_{j}^{2m})=(\gamma\circ\iota^{1})(x_{j}^{2m})=\mu(x_{j}^{2m})\le R^{2m} by the only-if direction of The Norm Bound of a Noncommutative Law: Multiplication by a Variable is Bounded, the Bound is Detected by Even Moments, and Laws Pull Back under Self-Adjoint Substitutions §criterion for μ\mu. For k∈[d]k\in[d], ι2(xk)=xd+k\iota^{2}(x_{k})=x_{d+k}, so likewise γ(xd+k2m)=ν(xk2m)≤R2m\gamma(x_{d+k}^{2m})=\nu(x_{k}^{2m})\le R^{2m}. As every element of [2d][2d] is of one of these forms, the if direction of the same clause gives γ∈Σ2d,R\gamma\in\Sigma_{2d,R}.

Step 2 (claim 2). For j∈[d]j\in[d], xj∗=xjx_{j}^{*}=x_{j} (Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §adjoint), so μ(xj2)=μ(xj∗xj)\mu(x_{j}^{2})=\mu(x_{j}^{*}x_{j}) is real and nonnegative by (b) of Noncommutative Laws of Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables with a Norm Bound §tracial-state; by (F9) and claim 5 of Properties of Finite Sums, M(μ)M(\mu) is real and nonnegative, and likewise M(ν)M(\nu). Let γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) and j∈[d]j\in[d]. By Basic Properties of Noncommutative Laws: Adjoints, the Self-Adjoint Pairing, Cauchy-Schwarz, Monotonicity in the Bound, and Laws of Constant Tuples §pairing with a=xja=x_{j}, b=xd+jb=x_{d+j}, the number gj=γ(xjxd+j)g_{j}=\gamma(x_{j}x_{d+j}) is real, and γ(xd+jxj)=gj\gamma(x_{d+j}x_{j})=g_{j} by (c). By Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §homomorphism and Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §values, ι1(xjxj)=xjxj\iota^{1}(x_{j}x_{j})=x_{j}x_{j} and ι2(xjxj)=xd+jxd+j\iota^{2}(x_{j}x_{j})=x_{d+j}x_{d+j}, so γ(xj2)=μ(xj2)\gamma(x_{j}^{2})=\mu(x_{j}^{2}) and γ(xd+j2)=ν(xj2)\gamma(x_{d+j}^{2})=\nu(x_{j}^{2}). By Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §algebra and (F1), qj2=xj2−xjxd+j−xd+jxj+xd+j2q_{j}^{2}=x_{j}^{2}-x_{j}x_{d+j}-x_{d+j}x_{j}+x_{d+j}^{2} and rj2=xj2+xjxd+j+xd+jxj+xd+j2r_{j}^{2}=x_{j}^{2}+x_{j}x_{d+j}+x_{d+j}x_{j}+x_{d+j}^{2}, so by linearity

γ(qj2)=μ(xj2)+ν(xj2)−2gj,γ(rj2)=μ(xj2)+ν(xj2)+2gj.\gamma(q_{j}^{2})=\mu(x_{j}^{2})+\nu(x_{j}^{2})-2g_{j},\qquad \gamma(r_{j}^{2})=\mu(x_{j}^{2})+\nu(x_{j}^{2})+2g_{j}.

By claim 4 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors, I(γ)=γ(Δd)=∑j=1dγ(qj2)I(\gamma)=\gamma(\Delta_{d})=\sum_{j=1}^{d}\gamma(q_{j}^{2}), and claims 2 and 3 of Properties of Finite Sums give the stated identity. Since qjq_{j} and rjr_{j} are self-adjoint (F2), γ(qj2)=γ(qj∗qj)\gamma(q_{j}^{2})=\gamma(q_{j}^{*}q_{j}) and γ(rj2)=γ(rj∗rj)\gamma(r_{j}^{2})=\gamma(r_{j}^{*}r_{j}) are real and nonnegative; so I(γ)≥0I(\gamma)\ge0 by (F9) and claim 5 of Properties of Finite Sums. Moreover 2μ(xj2)+2ν(xj2)−γ(qj2)=γ(rj2)≥02\mu(x_{j}^{2})+2\nu(x_{j}^{2})-\gamma(q_{j}^{2})=\gamma(r_{j}^{2})\ge0, so, summing with claims 2, 3 and 5 of Properties of Finite Sums, 2M(μ)+2M(ν)−I(γ)≥02M(\mu)+2M(\nu)-I(\gamma)\ge0, i.e. I(γ)≤2M(μ)+2M(ν)I(\gamma)\le2M(\mu)+2M(\nu) by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

Step 3 (claim 3). Existence and uniqueness of τ=μ⊗ν\tau=\mu\otimes\nu is (a) of Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §linear-extension with c(w)=μ(σ1(xw))ν(σ2(xw))c(w)=\mu(\sigma^{1}(x_{w}))\nu(\sigma^{2}(x_{w})). By (F2), σ1,σ2\sigma^{1},\sigma^{2} substitute self-adjoint tuples, so they are multiplicative, unital and commute with adjoints (Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §values, Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §homomorphism, Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §adjoint). For u,v∈W2du,v\in W_{2d}, xuxv=xuvx_{u}x_{v}=x_{uv} and xu∗xv=xurevxv=xurevvx_{u}^{*}x_{v}=x_{u^{\mathrm{rev}}}x_{v}=x_{u^{\mathrm{rev}}v} are monomials (Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §monomials, Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §adjoint), hence

τ(xuxv)=μ(σ1(xu)σ1(xv)) ν(σ2(xu)σ2(xv)),τ(xu∗xv)=K(u,v)L(u,v),\tau(x_{u}x_{v})=\mu\bigl(\sigma^{1}(x_{u})\sigma^{1}(x_{v})\bigr)\,\nu\bigl(\sigma^{2}(x_{u})\sigma^{2}(x_{v})\bigr),\qquad \tau(x_{u}^{*}x_{v})=K(u,v)L(u,v),

where K(u,v)=μ(σ1(xu)∗σ1(xv))K(u,v)=\mu(\sigma^{1}(x_{u})^{*}\sigma^{1}(x_{v})) and L(u,v)=ν(σ2(xu)∗σ2(xv))L(u,v)=\nu(\sigma^{2}(x_{u})^{*}\sigma^{2}(x_{v})).

(a) τ(1)=τ(x∅)=μ(1)ν(1)=1\tau(1)=\tau(x_{\varnothing})=\mu(1)\nu(1)=1.

(b) Let p∈P2dp\in\mathcal{P}_{2d} and let F=supp⁡pF=\operatorname{supp}p if p≠0p\neq0 and F={∅}F=\{\varnothing\} if p=0p=0; FF is nonempty and finite (The Algebra of Noncommutative Polynomials in Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables §polynomials, claim 2 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets) and contains supp⁡p\operatorname{supp}p. We show KK (restricted to F×FF\times F) is a positive semidefinite kernel on FF (Positive Semidefinite Kernel on a Finite Set §kernel). By Basic Properties of Noncommutative Laws: Adjoints, the Self-Adjoint Pairing, Cauchy-Schwarz, Monotonicity in the Bound, and Laws of Constant Tuples §adjoint, K(v,u)=μ(σ1(xv)∗σ1(xu))=K(u,v)‾K(v,u)=\mu(\sigma^{1}(x_{v})^{*}\sigma^{1}(x_{u}))=\overline{K(u,v)}. Given z:F→Cz:F\to\mathbb{C}, let s:W2d→Cs:W_{2d}\to\mathbb{C} be zz on FF and 00 elsewhere; supp⁡s⊆F\operatorname{supp}s\subseteq F is finite (claim 3 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets), so s∈P2ds\in\mathcal{P}_{2d}. By (F8)(ii) for the linear map μ∘σ1\mu\circ\sigma^{1}, and σ1(xu∗xv)=σ1(xu)∗σ1(xv)\sigma^{1}(x_{u}^{*}x_{v})=\sigma^{1}(x_{u})^{*}\sigma^{1}(x_{v}),

QK(z)=∑(u,v)∈F×Fs(u)‾ s(v) μ(σ1(xu∗xv))=μ(σ1(s∗s))=μ(σ1(s)∗σ1(s)),Q_{K}(z)=\sum_{(u,v)\in F\times F}\overline{s(u)}\,s(v)\,\mu\bigl(\sigma^{1}(x_{u}^{*}x_{v})\bigr)=\mu\bigl(\sigma^{1}(s^{*}s)\bigr)=\mu\bigl(\sigma^{1}(s)^{*}\sigma^{1}(s)\bigr),

which is real and nonnegative by (b) of Noncommutative Laws of Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables with a Norm Bound §tracial-state. The same argument with ν,σ2\nu,\sigma^{2} shows LL is a positive semidefinite kernel on FF, so KLKL is one by Positive Semidefinite Kernels on a Finite Set: Rank-One Decomposition and the Schur Product §schur. With z(u)=p(u)z(u)=p(u) (u∈F)(u\in F), (F8)(ii) for τ\tau gives τ(p∗p)=∑(u,v)∈F×Fz(u)‾z(v)K(u,v)L(u,v)=QKL(z)\tau(p^{*}p)=\sum_{(u,v)\in F\times F}\overline{z(u)}z(v)K(u,v)L(u,v)=Q_{KL}(z), real and nonnegative.

(c) For u,v∈W2du,v\in W_{2d}, (c) of Noncommutative Laws of Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables with a Norm Bound §tracial-state for μ\mu and ν\nu and the displayed formula give τ(xuxv)=τ(xvxu)\tau(x_{u}x_{v})=\tau(x_{v}x_{u}). For fixed uu, q↦τ(xuq)q\mapsto\tau(x_{u}q) and q↦τ(qxu)q\mapsto\tau(qx_{u}) are linear (Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §algebra) and agree on monomials, so they are equal by (F7); then for fixed qq, p↦τ(pq)p\mapsto\tau(pq) and p↦τ(qp)p\mapsto\tau(qp) are linear and agree on monomials, so they are equal. Thus τ\tau is a tracial state.

Marginals. By (F4), σ1∘ι1=σc\sigma^{1}\circ\iota^{1}=\sigma_{c} with cj=σ1(xj)=xjc_{j}=\sigma^{1}(x_{j})=x_{j} (j∈[d])(j\in[d]), the identity of Pd\mathcal{P}_{d}, and σ2∘ι1=σc′\sigma^{2}\circ\iota^{1}=\sigma_{c'} with cj′=σ2(xj)=1c'_{j}=\sigma^{2}(x_{j})=1. For w∈Wdw\in W_{d}, ι1(xw)\iota^{1}(x_{w}) is a monomial of P2d\mathcal{P}_{2d} by (F5), so τ(ι1(xw))=μ(σ1(ι1(xw))) ν(σ2(ι1(xw)))=μ(xw)ν(1)=μ(xw)\tau(\iota^{1}(x_{w}))=\mu(\sigma^{1}(\iota^{1}(x_{w})))\,\nu(\sigma^{2}(\iota^{1}(x_{w})))=\mu(x_{w})\nu(1)=\mu(x_{w}), using (F5) for c′c'. Both τ∘ι1\tau\circ\iota^{1} and μ\mu are linear, so τ∘ι1=μ\tau\circ\iota^{1}=\mu by (F7). Symmetrically σ1∘ι2\sigma^{1}\circ\iota^{2} sends each xjx_{j} to 11 and σ2∘ι2\sigma^{2}\circ\iota^{2} is the identity, so τ(ι2(xw))=μ(1)ν(xw)=ν(xw)\tau(\iota^{2}(x_{w}))=\mu(1)\nu(x_{w})=\nu(x_{w}) and τ∘ι2=ν\tau\circ\iota^{2}=\nu. Hence τ∈Π(μ,ν)\tau\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) by Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling, and Π(μ,ν)≠∅\Pi(\mu,\nu)\neq\emptyset.

Step 4 (claim 4). By (F2) and (F3), μ∘δ\mu\circ\delta is a tracial state on P2d\mathcal{P}_{2d}. By (F4), δ∘ι1\delta\circ\iota^{1} and δ∘ι2\delta\circ\iota^{2} are σc\sigma_{c} with cj=δ(xj)=xjc_{j}=\delta(x_{j})=x_{j}, resp. cj=δ(xd+j)=xjc_{j}=\delta(x_{d+j})=x_{j}, i.e. the identity; so (μ∘δ)∘ι1=(μ∘δ)∘ι2=μ(\mu\circ\delta)\circ\iota^{1}=(\mu\circ\delta)\circ\iota^{2}=\mu and μ∘δ∈Π(μ,μ)\mu\circ\delta\in\Pi(\mu,\mu). By linearity and Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §values, δ(qj)=xj−xj=0\delta(q_{j})=x_{j}-x_{j}=0 (F1), so δ(qj2)=0⋅0=0\delta(q_{j}^{2})=0\cdot0=0 by Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §homomorphism and (F1), and δ(Δd)=∑j=1d0=0\delta(\Delta_{d})=\sum_{j=1}^{d}0=0 by claims 4 and 7 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors. Thus I(μ∘δ)=μ(0)=0I(\mu\circ\delta)=\mu(0)=0.

Step 5 (claim 5). Here s(xj)=xd+js(x_{j})=x_{d+j} and s(xd+j)=xjs(x_{d+j})=x_{j} for j∈[d]j\in[d]. By (F2) and (F3), γ∘s\gamma\circ s is a tracial state. By (F4), s∘ι1=σ(xd+1,…,x2d)=ι2s\circ\iota^{1}=\sigma_{(x_{d+1},\dots,x_{2d})}=\iota^{2} and s∘ι2=σ(x1,…,xd)=ι1s\circ\iota^{2}=\sigma_{(x_{1},\dots,x_{d})}=\iota^{1}, so (γ∘s)∘ι1=ν(\gamma\circ s)\circ\iota^{1}=\nu and (γ∘s)∘ι2=μ(\gamma\circ s)\circ\iota^{2}=\mu, i.e. γ∘s∈Π(ν,μ)\gamma\circ s\in\Pi(\nu,\mu). Further s(qj)=xd+j−xj=(−1)qjs(q_{j})=x_{d+j}-x_{j}=(-1)q_{j} (F1), so s(qj2)=((−1)qj)((−1)qj)=qj2s(q_{j}^{2})=((-1)q_{j})((-1)q_{j})=q_{j}^{2} by Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §homomorphism and Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §algebra; by claim 4 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors, s(Δd)=Δds(\Delta_{d})=\Delta_{d} and I(γ∘s)=γ(s(Δd))=I(γ)I(\gamma\circ s)=\gamma(s(\Delta_{d}))=I(\gamma).

Step 6 (claim 6). By Step 1, γm∈Σ2d,R\gamma_{m}\in\Sigma_{2d,R} for all mm, so Sequential Weak-Star Compactness of the Noncommutative Laws with a Given Norm Bound §compact gives a strictly increasing (mi)i∈N(m_{i})_{i\in\mathbb{N}} (Subsequence of a Sequence in a Set) and γ∈Σ2d,R\gamma\in\Sigma_{2d,R} with γmi→γ\gamma_{m_{i}}\to\gamma weak-star; γ\gamma is a tracial state. By Sequential Weak-Star Compactness of the Noncommutative Laws with a Given Norm Bound §unique (second sentence; μm∈Σd\mu_{m}\in\Sigma_{d} by Noncommutative Laws of Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables with a Norm Bound §law), μmi→μ\mu_{m_{i}}\to\mu weak-star. Let p∈Pdp\in\mathcal{P}_{d}. For every ii, γmi(ι1(p))=μmi(p)\gamma_{m_{i}}(\iota^{1}(p))=\mu_{m_{i}}(p), so the real sequence (Re⁡γmi(ι1(p)))i(\operatorname{Re}\gamma_{m_{i}}(\iota^{1}(p)))_{i} converges both to Re⁡μ(p)\operatorname{Re}\mu(p) and, by Weak-Star Convergence of Noncommutative Laws §weak-star applied to ι1(p)∈P2d\iota^{1}(p)\in\mathcal{P}_{2d}, to Re⁡γ(ι1(p))\operatorname{Re}\gamma(\iota^{1}(p)); by claim 1 of Uniqueness of Limits and Boundedness of Convergent Real Sequences these are equal, and likewise the imaginary parts. By (F9), γ(ι1(p))=μ(p)\gamma(\iota^{1}(p))=\mu(p). The same argument gives γ∘ι2=ν\gamma\circ\iota^{2}=\nu, so γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu). Finally I(γmi)=γmi(Δd)I(\gamma_{m_{i}})=\gamma_{m_{i}}(\Delta_{d}) and I(γ)=γ(Δd)I(\gamma)=\gamma(\Delta_{d}) are real by Step 2 (applied to μmi,νmi\mu_{m_{i}},\nu_{m_{i}} and to μ,ν\mu,\nu), so by (F9) and weak-star convergence at Δd\Delta_{d}, I(γmi)=Re⁡γmi(Δd)→Re⁡γ(Δd)=I(γ)I(\gamma_{m_{i}})=\operatorname{Re}\gamma_{m_{i}}(\Delta_{d})\to\operatorname{Re}\gamma(\Delta_{d})=I(\gamma).

Step 7 (claim 7). By Step 1, γ∈Σ2d,R\gamma\in\Sigma_{2d,R}. For j∈[d]j\in[d] put cj0=0c_{j0}=0, cjj=1−tc_{jj}=1-t, cj,d+j=tc_{j,d+j}=t and cjk=0c_{jk}=0 for the other k∈[2d]k\in[2d] (well defined since j≠d+jj\neq d+j); these are real, and 0≤1−t0\le1-t by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Writing cjkxk=uk+vkc_{jk}x_{k}=u_{k}+v_{k} with uk=cjkxku_{k}=c_{jk}x_{k} for k=jk=j, vk=cjkxkv_{k}=c_{jk}x_{k} for k=d+jk=d+j, and all other uk,vku_{k},v_{k} equal to 00 (F1), claims 2 and 7 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors give cj01+∑k=12dcjkxk=ajtc_{j0}1+\sum_{k=1}^{2d}c_{jk}x_{k}=a^{t}_{j}; similarly, by claims 2 and 7 of Properties of Finite Sums and claim 8 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus, ∣cj0∣+R∑k=12d∣cjk∣=0+R((1−t)+t)=R|c_{j0}|+R\sum_{k=1}^{2d}|c_{jk}|=0+R((1-t)+t)=R. So The Norm Bound of a Noncommutative Law: Multiplication by a Variable is Bounded, the Bound is Detected by Even Moments, and Laws Pull Back under Self-Adjoint Substitutions §affine (for γ\gamma, with n=dn=d and S=RS=R) gives γt∈Σd,R⊆Σd\gamma_{t}\in\Sigma_{d,R}\subseteq\Sigma_{d}. By (F1), aj0=xja^{0}_{j}=x_{j} and aj1=xd+ja^{1}_{j}=x_{d+j}, so σa0=ι1\sigma_{a^{0}}=\iota^{1}, σa1=ι2\sigma_{a^{1}}=\iota^{2}, and γ0=μ\gamma_{0}=\mu, γ1=ν\gamma_{1}=\nu (Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling).

Let b=(x1,…,xd,a1t,…,adt)b=(x_{1},\dots,x_{d},a^{t}_{1},\dots,a^{t}_{d}). By (F2) and (F3), γ∘σb\gamma\circ\sigma_{b} is a tracial state; by (F4), σb∘ι1=σ(x1,…,xd)=ι1\sigma_{b}\circ\iota^{1}=\sigma_{(x_{1},\dots,x_{d})}=\iota^{1} and σb∘ι2=σat\sigma_{b}\circ\iota^{2}=\sigma_{a^{t}}, so (γ∘σb)∘ι1=μ(\gamma\circ\sigma_{b})\circ\iota^{1}=\mu and (γ∘σb)∘ι2=γt(\gamma\circ\sigma_{b})\circ\iota^{2}=\gamma_{t}, whence γ∘σb∈Π(μ,γt)\gamma\circ\sigma_{b}\in\Pi(\mu,\gamma_{t}). By linearity, Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §values and (F1), σb(qj)=xj−ajt=t qj\sigma_{b}(q_{j})=x_{j}-a^{t}_{j}=t\,q_{j} (at each word, c−((1−t)c+tc′)=t(c−c′)c-((1-t)c+tc')=t(c-c')), so σb(qj2)=(tqj)(tqj)=t2qj2\sigma_{b}(q_{j}^{2})=(tq_{j})(tq_{j})=t^{2}q_{j}^{2} by Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §homomorphism and Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §algebra, and σb(Δd)=t2Δd\sigma_{b}(\Delta_{d})=t^{2}\Delta_{d} by claims 3 and 4 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors. Hence the cost is γ(σb(Δd))=t2I(γ)\gamma(\sigma_{b}(\Delta_{d}))=t^{2}I(\gamma).

Let b′=(a1t,…,adt,xd+1,…,x2d)b'=(a^{t}_{1},\dots,a^{t}_{d},x_{d+1},\dots,x_{2d}). As before γ∘σb′\gamma\circ\sigma_{b'} is a tracial state, σb′∘ι1=σat\sigma_{b'}\circ\iota^{1}=\sigma_{a^{t}} and σb′∘ι2=ι2\sigma_{b'}\circ\iota^{2}=\iota^{2}, so γ∘σb′∈Π(γt,ν)\gamma\circ\sigma_{b'}\in\Pi(\gamma_{t},\nu); and σb′(qj)=ajt−xd+j=(1−t)qj\sigma_{b'}(q_{j})=a^{t}_{j}-x_{d+j}=(1-t)q_{j}, so σb′(Δd)=(1−t)2Δd\sigma_{b'}(\Delta_{d})=(1-t)^{2}\Delta_{d} and the cost is (1−t)2I(γ)(1-t)^{2}I(\gamma). ■\blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…