Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. We write W W W for W 2 W_{2} W 2 , M = M ( δ , α ) M=M(\delta,\alpha) M = M ( δ , α ) and Ψ = Ψ δ , α \Psi=\Psi_{\delta,\alpha} Ψ = Ψ δ , α . For n ∈ N n\in\mathbb{N} n ∈ N let ϵ n \epsilon_{n} ϵ n be the multiplicative inverse of the positive real attached to n n n (The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §numbers ), so that 0 < ϵ n ≤ 1 0<\epsilon_{n}\le1 0 < ϵ n ≤ 1 ; the real sequences ( ϵ n ) n (\epsilon_{n})_{n} ( ϵ n ) n and ( ϵ n 2 ) n (\epsilon_{n}^{2})_{n} ( ϵ n 2 ) n converge to 0 0 0 by The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers and Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences . The distance on S ( d ) \mathcal{S}(d) S ( d ) is d S ( d ) ( P , P ′ ) = ∥ P − P ′ ∥ d_{\mathcal{S}(d)}(P,P')=\lVert P-P'\rVert d S ( d ) ( P , P ′ ) = ∥ P − P ′ ∥ , a metric (Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation §matrices ).
Step 0 (Norms along a coupling). Let ν , μ ∈ P 2 ( R d ) \nu,\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) ν , μ ∈ P 2 ( R d ) , π ∈ Π ( ν , μ ) \pi\in\Pi(\nu,\mu) π ∈ Π ( ν , μ ) , q ∈ L 2 ( ν ; R d ) q\in L^{2}(\nu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) q ∈ L 2 ( ν ; R d ) and η ∈ L 2 ( μ ; R d ) \eta\in L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) η ∈ L 2 ( μ ; R d ) . The maps q ∘ p r 1 q\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1} q ∘ pr 1 and η ∘ p r 2 \eta\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2} η ∘ pr 2 (for representatives) are Borel, and by the change-of-variables formula and ( p r 1 ) # π = ν (\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\pi=\nu ( pr 1 ) # π = ν , ( p r 2 ) # π = μ (\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\pi=\mu ( pr 2 ) # π = μ their classes in the real Hilbert space L 2 ( π ; R d ) L^{2}(\pi;\mathbb{R}^{d}) L 2 ( π ; R d ) (Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation §fields ) have norms ∥ q ∥ ν \lVert q\rVert_{\nu} ∥ q ∥ ν and ∥ η ∥ μ \lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu} ∥ η ∥ μ , while the norm of their difference is the square root of the discrepancy of q q q and η \eta η along π \pi π . The triangle inequality The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle gives
∥ q ∥ ν ≤ ( ∫ R d + d ∥ q ( x ) − η ( y ) ∥ 2 π ( d z ) ) 1 / 2 + ∥ η ∥ μ . \lVert q\rVert_{\nu}\le\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\lVert q(x)-\eta(y)\rVert^{2}\,\pi(dz)\Bigr)^{1/2}+\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}. ∥ q ∥ ν ≤ ( ∫ R d + d ∥ q ( x ) − η ( y ) ∥ 2 π ( d z ) ) 1/2 + ∥ η ∥ μ .
With q q q and η \eta η the classes of i d \mathrm{id} id (Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §identity ), the discrepancy is I ( π ) I(\pi) I ( π ) (Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §cost ) and ∥ i d ∥ ν 2 = M 2 ( ν ) \lVert\mathrm{id}\rVert_{\nu}^{2}=M_{2}(\nu) ∥ id ∥ ν 2 = M 2 ( ν ) , so M 2 ( ν ) ≤ I ( π ) + M 2 ( μ ) \sqrt{M_{2}(\nu)}\le\sqrt{I(\pi)}+\sqrt{M_{2}(\mu)} M 2 ( ν ) ≤ I ( π ) + M 2 ( μ ) .
Step 1 (A maximising pair and admitted matrices). By Existence, Penalty Bounds and the Least Penalty at a Maximiser of the Wasserstein-Doubled Difference §maximiser there is ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) ∈ D × D (\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) ∈ D × D with Ψ ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) = M \Psi(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})=M Ψ ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) = M . Apply Intrinsic Test Functions at a Maximiser of the Wasserstein-Doubled Difference with the present δ \delta δ , α \alpha α , u u u , v v v , b b b , b ′ b' b ′ and ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) (\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu}) ( μ ^ , ν ^ ) ; its hypotheses are among ours. It provides ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ∈ D \rho^{*},\sigma^{*}\in\mathcal{D} ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ∈ D and X , Y ∈ S ( d ) \mathbb{X},\mathbb{Y}\in\mathcal{S}(d) X , Y ∈ S ( d ) ; let S S S , S ′ S' S ′ be the optimal maps named there, and put
V ∗ = α ( i d − S ) ∈ L 2 ( ρ ∗ ; R d ) , V ∗ ′ = α ( S ′ − i d ) ∈ L 2 ( σ ∗ ; R d ) , s ∗ = u δ − ( ρ ∗ ) , t ∗ = v δ + ( σ ∗ ) . V_{*}=\alpha(\mathrm{id}-S)\in L^{2}(\rho^{*};\mathbb{R}^{d}),\qquad V'_{*}=\alpha(S'-\mathrm{id})\in L^{2}(\sigma^{*};\mathbb{R}^{d}),\qquad s_{*}=u^{-}_{\delta}(\rho^{*}),\qquad t_{*}=v^{+}_{\delta}(\sigma^{*}). V ∗ = α ( id − S ) ∈ L 2 ( ρ ∗ ; R d ) , V ∗ ′ = α ( S ′ − id ) ∈ L 2 ( σ ∗ ; R d ) , s ∗ = u δ − ( ρ ∗ ) , t ∗ = v δ + ( σ ∗ ) .
By Intrinsic Test Functions at a Maximiser of the Wasserstein-Doubled Difference §maximiser , Ψ ( ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ) = M \Psi(\rho^{*},\sigma^{*})=M Ψ ( ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ) = M , so by hypothesis δ ∣ E ( ρ ∗ ) ∣ ≤ B \delta|\mathcal{E}(\rho^{*})|\le B δ ∣ E ( ρ ∗ ) ∣ ≤ B and δ ∣ E ( σ ∗ ) ∣ ≤ B \delta|\mathcal{E}(\sigma^{*})|\le B δ ∣ E ( σ ∗ ) ∣ ≤ B ; by Intrinsic Test Functions at a Maximiser of the Wasserstein-Doubled Difference §admitted , ( X , Y ) (\mathbb{X},\mathbb{Y}) ( X , Y ) is admitted at α \alpha α , so ∥ X ∥ ≤ 6 α \lVert\mathbb{X}\rVert\le6\alpha ∥ X ∥ ≤ 6 α and ∥ Y ∥ ≤ 6 α \lVert\mathbb{Y}\rVert\le6\alpha ∥ Y ∥ ≤ 6 α (The Second-Order Structure Condition at Optimally Coupled Pairs on the Lift of the Wasserstein Space §admitted ). As s ∗ − t ∗ = M + α 2 W ( ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ) 2 s_{*}-t_{*}=M+\tfrac{\alpha}{2}W(\rho^{*},\sigma^{*})^{2} s ∗ − t ∗ = M + 2 α W ( ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ) 2 and 0 ≤ M 0\le M 0 ≤ M , we have M ≤ s ∗ − t ∗ M\le s_{*}-t_{*} M ≤ s ∗ − t ∗ and t ∗ ≤ s ∗ t_{*}\le s_{*} t ∗ ≤ s ∗ . Since u δ − = u − δ E ≤ b − δ e 0 u^{-}_{\delta}=u-\delta\mathcal{E}\le b-\delta e_{0} u δ − = u − δ E ≤ b − δ e 0 and v δ + = v + δ E ≥ b ′ + δ e 0 v^{+}_{\delta}=v+\delta\mathcal{E}\ge b'+\delta e_{0} v δ + = v + δ E ≥ b ′ + δ e 0 on D \mathcal{D} D (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ),
b ′ + δ e 0 ≤ t ∗ ≤ s ∗ ≤ b − δ e 0 , b'+\delta e_{0}\le t_{*}\le s_{*}\le b-\delta e_{0}, b ′ + δ e 0 ≤ t ∗ ≤ s ∗ ≤ b − δ e 0 ,
and as 0 < δ < 1 0<\delta<1 0 < δ < 1 gives ∣ δ e 0 ∣ ≤ ∣ e 0 ∣ |\delta e_{0}|\le|e_{0}| ∣ δ e 0 ∣ ≤ ∣ e 0 ∣ (claims 4 and 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field ), ∣ s ∗ ∣ ≤ ∣ b ∣ + ∣ b ′ ∣ + ∣ e 0 ∣ ≤ B |s_{*}|\le|b|+|b'|+|e_{0}|\le B ∣ s ∗ ∣ ≤ ∣ b ∣ + ∣ b ′ ∣ + ∣ e 0 ∣ ≤ B and ∣ t ∗ ∣ ≤ B |t_{*}|\le B ∣ t ∗ ∣ ≤ B (claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field ).
Step 2 (Viscosity data on the subsolution side). Let n ∈ N n\in\mathbb{N} n ∈ N . By Intrinsic Test Functions at a Maximiser of the Wasserstein-Doubled Difference §subsolution with ε = ϵ n \varepsilon=\epsilon_{n} ε = ϵ n there are ρ n ∈ D \rho_{n}\in\mathcal{D} ρ n ∈ D , an intrinsic test function φ n \varphi_{n} φ n on D \mathcal{D} D with u δ − − φ n u^{-}_{\delta}-\varphi_{n} u δ − − φ n having a local maximum relative to D \mathcal{D} D at ρ n \rho_{n} ρ n , and π n ∈ Π ( ρ n , ρ ∗ ) \pi_{n}\in\Pi(\rho_{n},\rho^{*}) π n ∈ Π ( ρ n , ρ ∗ ) with
I ( π n ) < ϵ n 2 , ∣ u δ − ( ρ n ) − s ∗ ∣ < ϵ n , ∫ R d + d ∥ ∇ φ n ( ρ n ) ( x ) − V ∗ ( y ) ∥ 2 π n ( d z ) < ϵ n 2 , ∥ H φ n ( ρ n ) − X ∥ < ϵ n . I(\pi_{n})<\epsilon_{n}^{2},\quad|u^{-}_{\delta}(\rho_{n})-s_{*}|<\epsilon_{n},\quad\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\lVert\nabla\varphi_{n}(\rho_{n})(x)-V_{*}(y)\rVert^{2}\,\pi_{n}(dz)<\epsilon_{n}^{2},\quad\lVert H_{\varphi_{n}}(\rho_{n})-\mathbb{X}\rVert<\epsilon_{n}. I ( π n ) < ϵ n 2 , ∣ u δ − ( ρ n ) − s ∗ ∣ < ϵ n , ∫ R d + d ∥ ∇ φ n ( ρ n ) ( x ) − V ∗ ( y ) ∥ 2 π n ( d z ) < ϵ n 2 , ∥ H φ n ( ρ n ) − X ∥ < ϵ n .
As u u u is a viscosity subsolution, Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on the Wasserstein Space §subsolution with φ n \varphi_{n} φ n , ρ n \rho_{n} ρ n and ϵ n \epsilon_{n} ϵ n gives ν n ∈ D Σ \nu_{n}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} ν n ∈ D Σ , γ n ∈ Π ( ν n , ρ n ) \gamma_{n}\in\Pi(\nu_{n},\rho_{n}) γ n ∈ Π ( ν n , ρ n ) , s n ∈ R s_{n}\in\mathbb{R} s n ∈ R , q n ∈ L 2 ( ν n ; R d ) q_{n}\in L^{2}(\nu_{n};\mathbb{R}^{d}) q n ∈ L 2 ( ν n ; R d ) and X n ∈ S ( d ) X_{n}\in\mathcal{S}(d) X n ∈ S ( d ) with
I ( γ n ) < ϵ n 2 , ∣ u δ − ( ν n ) − u δ − ( ρ n ) ∣ < ϵ n , ∣ s n − u δ − ( ρ n ) ∣ < ϵ n , I(\gamma_{n})<\epsilon_{n}^{2},\quad|u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu_{n})-u^{-}_{\delta}(\rho_{n})|<\epsilon_{n},\quad|s_{n}-u^{-}_{\delta}(\rho_{n})|<\epsilon_{n}, I ( γ n ) < ϵ n 2 , ∣ u δ − ( ν n ) − u δ − ( ρ n ) ∣ < ϵ n , ∣ s n − u δ − ( ρ n ) ∣ < ϵ n ,
∫ R d + d ∥ q n ( x ) − ∇ φ n ( ρ n ) ( y ) ∥ 2 γ n ( d z ) < ϵ n 2 , ∥ X n − H φ n ( ρ n ) ∥ < ϵ n , F δ − ( ν n , s n , q n , X n ) ≤ ϵ n . \int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\lVert q_{n}(x)-\nabla\varphi_{n}(\rho_{n})(y)\rVert^{2}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)<\epsilon_{n}^{2},\quad\lVert X_{n}-H_{\varphi_{n}}(\rho_{n})\rVert<\epsilon_{n},\quad F^{-}_{\delta}(\nu_{n},s_{n},q_{n},X_{n})\le\epsilon_{n}. ∫ R d + d ∥ q n ( x ) − ∇ φ n ( ρ n ) ( y ) ∥ 2 γ n ( d z ) < ϵ n 2 , ∥ X n − H φ n ( ρ n )∥ < ϵ n , F δ − ( ν n , s n , q n , X n ) ≤ ϵ n .
Let β n \beta_{n} β n be a gluing of γ n \gamma_{n} γ n and π n \pi_{n} π n (Gluing Two Couplings over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Composite Coupling §glued ) and κ n = ( q 1 , q 3 ) # β n ∈ Π ( ν n , ρ ∗ ) \kappa_{n}=(\mathrm{q}_{1},\mathrm{q}_{3})_{\#}\beta_{n}\in\Pi(\nu_{n},\rho^{*}) κ n = ( q 1 , q 3 ) # β n ∈ Π ( ν n , ρ ∗ ) . By Gluing Two Couplings over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Composite Coupling §composite and A Triangle Inequality for Discrepancies Along a Composite Coupling §triangle , applied with q n q_{n} q n , ∇ φ n ( ρ n ) \nabla\varphi_{n}(\rho_{n}) ∇ φ n ( ρ n ) and V ∗ V_{*} V ∗ , and taking square roots (claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field ),
I ( κ n ) < 2 ϵ n , ( ∫ R d + d ∥ q n ( x ) − V ∗ ( y ) ∥ 2 κ n ( d z ) ) 1 / 2 < 2 ϵ n ; \sqrt{I(\kappa_{n})}<2\epsilon_{n},\qquad\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\lVert q_{n}(x)-V_{*}(y)\rVert^{2}\,\kappa_{n}(dz)\Bigr)^{1/2}<2\epsilon_{n}; I ( κ n ) < 2 ϵ n , ( ∫ R d + d ∥ q n ( x ) − V ∗ ( y ) ∥ 2 κ n ( d z ) ) 1/2 < 2 ϵ n ;
and by the triangle inequalities of ∣ ⋅ ∣ |\cdot| ∣ ⋅ ∣ (claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field ) and of the metric d S ( d ) d_{\mathcal{S}(d)} d S ( d ) ,
∣ u δ − ( ν n ) − s ∗ ∣ < 2 ϵ n , ∣ s n − s ∗ ∣ < 2 ϵ n , ∥ X n − X ∥ < 2 ϵ n . |u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu_{n})-s_{*}|<2\epsilon_{n},\qquad|s_{n}-s_{*}|<2\epsilon_{n},\qquad\lVert X_{n}-\mathbb{X}\rVert<2\epsilon_{n}. ∣ u δ − ( ν n ) − s ∗ ∣ < 2 ϵ n , ∣ s n − s ∗ ∣ < 2 ϵ n , ∥ X n − X ∥ < 2 ϵ n .
Hence ( κ n ) n (\kappa_{n})_{n} ( κ n ) n is a sequence of couplings of vanishing cost from ( ν n ) n (\nu_{n})_{n} ( ν n ) n to ρ ∗ \rho^{*} ρ ∗ , ( q n ) n (q_{n})_{n} ( q n ) n converges strongly to V ∗ V_{*} V ∗ along it, ( s n ) n (s_{n})_{n} ( s n ) n converges to s ∗ s_{*} s ∗ and ( X n ) n (X_{n})_{n} ( X n ) n to X \mathbb{X} X (squares of the bounds 2 ϵ n 2\epsilon_{n} 2 ϵ n being 4 ϵ n 2 4\epsilon_{n}^{2} 4 ϵ n 2 , and Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences ). By Step 0 with κ n \kappa_{n} κ n , M 2 ( ν n ) < M 2 ( ρ ∗ ) + 2 \sqrt{M_{2}(\nu_{n})}<\sqrt{M_{2}(\rho^{*})}+2 M 2 ( ν n ) < M 2 ( ρ ∗ ) + 2 and ∥ q n ∥ ν n < ∥ V ∗ ∥ ρ ∗ + 2 \lVert q_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}<\lVert V_{*}\rVert_{\rho^{*}}+2 ∥ q n ∥ ν n < ∥ V ∗ ∥ ρ ∗ + 2 ; also ∣ s n ∣ < B + 2 |s_{n}|<B+2 ∣ s n ∣ < B + 2 and ∥ X n ∥ ≤ d S ( d ) ( X n , X ) + ∥ X ∥ < 6 α + 2 \lVert X_{n}\rVert\le d_{\mathcal{S}(d)}(X_{n},\mathbb{X})+\lVert\mathbb{X}\rVert<6\alpha+2 ∥ X n ∥ ≤ d S ( d ) ( X n , X ) + ∥ X ∥ < 6 α + 2 . Finally ν n ∈ D Σ ⊆ D \nu_{n}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\subseteq\mathcal{D} ν n ∈ D Σ ⊆ D , so e 0 ≤ E ( ν n ) e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n}) e 0 ≤ E ( ν n ) , and − B − 2 < u δ − ( ν n ) = u ( ν n ) − δ E ( ν n ) ≤ b − δ E ( ν n ) -B-2<u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu_{n})=u(\nu_{n})-\delta\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n})\le b-\delta\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n}) − B − 2 < u δ − ( ν n ) = u ( ν n ) − δ E ( ν n ) ≤ b − δ E ( ν n ) gives E ( ν n ) < δ − 1 ( ∣ b ∣ + B + 2 ) \mathcal{E}(\nu_{n})<\delta^{-1}(|b|+B+2) E ( ν n ) < δ − 1 ( ∣ b ∣ + B + 2 ) ; so ∣ E ( ν n ) ∣ < δ − 1 ( ∣ b ∣ + B + 2 ) + ∣ e 0 ∣ + 1 |\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n})|<\delta^{-1}(|b|+B+2)+|e_{0}|+1 ∣ E ( ν n ) ∣ < δ − 1 ( ∣ b ∣ + B + 2 ) + ∣ e 0 ∣ + 1 .
Step 3 (Viscosity data on the supersolution side). In the same way, Intrinsic Test Functions at a Maximiser of the Wasserstein-Doubled Difference §supersolution with ε = ϵ n \varepsilon=\epsilon_{n} ε = ϵ n , the supersolution property Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on the Wasserstein Space §supersolution of v v v , a gluing and A Triangle Inequality for Discrepancies Along a Composite Coupling §triangle give ν n ′ ∈ D Σ \nu'_{n}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} ν n ′ ∈ D Σ , κ n ′ ∈ Π ( ν n ′ , σ ∗ ) \kappa'_{n}\in\Pi(\nu'_{n},\sigma^{*}) κ n ′ ∈ Π ( ν n ′ , σ ∗ ) , t n ∈ R t_{n}\in\mathbb{R} t n ∈ R , q n ′ ∈ L 2 ( ν n ′ ; R d ) q'_{n}\in L^{2}(\nu'_{n};\mathbb{R}^{d}) q n ′ ∈ L 2 ( ν n ′ ; R d ) and Y n ∈ S ( d ) Y_{n}\in\mathcal{S}(d) Y n ∈ S ( d ) with − ϵ n ≤ F δ + ( ν n ′ , t n , q n ′ , Y n ) -\epsilon_{n}\le F^{+}_{\delta}(\nu'_{n},t_{n},q'_{n},Y_{n}) − ϵ n ≤ F δ + ( ν n ′ , t n , q n ′ , Y n ) , I ( κ n ′ ) < 2 ϵ n \sqrt{I(\kappa'_{n})}<2\epsilon_{n} I ( κ n ′ ) < 2 ϵ n , the discrepancy of q n ′ q'_{n} q n ′ and V ∗ ′ V'_{*} V ∗ ′ along κ n ′ \kappa'_{n} κ n ′ below 4 ϵ n 2 4\epsilon_{n}^{2} 4 ϵ n 2 , ∣ v δ + ( ν n ′ ) − t ∗ ∣ < 2 ϵ n |v^{+}_{\delta}(\nu'_{n})-t_{*}|<2\epsilon_{n} ∣ v δ + ( ν n ′ ) − t ∗ ∣ < 2 ϵ n , ∣ t n − t ∗ ∣ < 2 ϵ n |t_{n}-t_{*}|<2\epsilon_{n} ∣ t n − t ∗ ∣ < 2 ϵ n and ∥ Y n − Y ∥ < 2 ϵ n \lVert Y_{n}-\mathbb{Y}\rVert<2\epsilon_{n} ∥ Y n − Y ∥ < 2 ϵ n . So ( κ n ′ ) n (\kappa'_{n})_{n} ( κ n ′ ) n has vanishing cost, ( q n ′ ) n (q'_{n})_{n} ( q n ′ ) n converges strongly to V ∗ ′ V'_{*} V ∗ ′ along it, t n → t ∗ t_{n}\to t_{*} t n → t ∗ and Y n → Y Y_{n}\to\mathbb{Y} Y n → Y ; and M 2 ( ν n ′ ) < M 2 ( σ ∗ ) + 2 \sqrt{M_{2}(\nu'_{n})}<\sqrt{M_{2}(\sigma^{*})}+2 M 2 ( ν n ′ ) < M 2 ( σ ∗ ) + 2 , ∥ q n ′ ∥ ν n ′ < ∥ V ∗ ′ ∥ σ ∗ + 2 \lVert q'_{n}\rVert_{\nu'_{n}}<\lVert V'_{*}\rVert_{\sigma^{*}}+2 ∥ q n ′ ∥ ν n ′ < ∥ V ∗ ′ ∥ σ ∗ + 2 , ∣ t n ∣ < B + 2 |t_{n}|<B+2 ∣ t n ∣ < B + 2 , ∥ Y n ∥ < 6 α + 2 \lVert Y_{n}\rVert<6\alpha+2 ∥ Y n ∥ < 6 α + 2 , and, from b ′ + δ E ( ν n ′ ) ≤ v δ + ( ν n ′ ) < B + 2 b'+\delta\mathcal{E}(\nu'_{n})\le v^{+}_{\delta}(\nu'_{n})<B+2 b ′ + δ E ( ν n ′ ) ≤ v δ + ( ν n ′ ) < B + 2 and e 0 ≤ E ( ν n ′ ) e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\nu'_{n}) e 0 ≤ E ( ν n ′ ) , ∣ E ( ν n ′ ) ∣ < δ − 1 ( ∣ b ′ ∣ + B + 2 ) + ∣ e 0 ∣ + 1 |\mathcal{E}(\nu'_{n})|<\delta^{-1}(|b'|+B+2)+|e_{0}|+1 ∣ E ( ν n ′ ) ∣ < δ − 1 ( ∣ b ′ ∣ + B + 2 ) + ∣ e 0 ∣ + 1 .
Step 4 (Shift-coercivity and closed score). Let
R ′ = M 2 ( ρ ∗ ) + M 2 ( σ ∗ ) + ∥ V ∗ ∥ ρ ∗ + ∥ V ∗ ′ ∥ σ ∗ + δ − 1 ( ∣ b ∣ + ∣ b ′ ∣ + 2 B + 4 ) + 2 ∣ e 0 ∣ + 2 B + 12 α + 10 , R'=\sqrt{M_{2}(\rho^{*})}+\sqrt{M_{2}(\sigma^{*})}+\lVert V_{*}\rVert_{\rho^{*}}+\lVert V'_{*}\rVert_{\sigma^{*}}+\delta^{-1}\bigl(|b|+|b'|+2B+4\bigr)+2|e_{0}|+2B+12\alpha+10, R ′ = M 2 ( ρ ∗ ) + M 2 ( σ ∗ ) + ∥ V ∗ ∥ ρ ∗ + ∥ V ∗ ′ ∥ σ ∗ + δ − 1 ( ∣ b ∣ + ∣ b ′ ∣ + 2 B + 4 ) + 2∣ e 0 ∣ + 2 B + 12 α + 10 ,
a sum of nonnegative reals and 10 10 10 , which exceeds every bound listed at the end of Steps 2 and 3 and exceeds 2 2 2 . For n ∈ N n\in\mathbb{N} n ∈ N put ξ n = ( ν n , s n , q n , X n ) \xi_{n}=(\nu_{n},s_{n},q_{n},X_{n}) ξ n = ( ν n , s n , q n , X n ) and η n = ( ν n ′ , t n , q n ′ , Y n ) \eta_{n}=(\nu'_{n},t_{n},q'_{n},Y_{n}) η n = ( ν n ′ , t n , q n ′ , Y n ) , test data for F F F ; they are R ′ R' R ′ -bounded , and F δ − ( ξ n ) − F δ + ( η n ) ≤ 2 ϵ n ≤ 2 < R ′ F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi_{n})-F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{n})\le2\epsilon_{n}\le2<R' F δ − ( ξ n ) − F δ + ( η n ) ≤ 2 ϵ n ≤ 2 < R ′ , so ξ n ∈ S δ , R ′ − \xi_{n}\in S^{-}_{\delta,R'} ξ n ∈ S δ , R ′ − and η n ∈ S δ , R ′ + \eta_{n}\in S^{+}_{\delta,R'} η n ∈ S δ , R ′ + (Test Data for an Intrinsic Second-Order Equation Operator on the Wasserstein Space and the Admissible Sets §admissible ), each witnessing the other. By the shift-coercivity condition there is a score bound C ≥ 0 C\ge0 C ≥ 0 for F F F at ( δ , R ′ ) (\delta,R') ( δ , R ′ ) , so ∥ Σ ( ν n ) ∥ ν n ≤ C \lVert\Sigma(\nu_{n})\rVert_{\nu_{n}}\le C ∥ Σ ( ν n ) ∥ ν n ≤ C and ∥ Σ ( ν n ′ ) ∥ ν n ′ ≤ C \lVert\Sigma(\nu'_{n})\rVert_{\nu'_{n}}\le C ∥ Σ ( ν n ′ ) ∥ ν n ′ ≤ C for every n n n . By Penalty Pairs with Closed Score Along Couplings §closed at the level C C C , applied to ( ν n ) n (\nu_{n})_{n} ( ν n ) n , ρ ∗ \rho^{*} ρ ∗ and ( κ n ) n (\kappa_{n})_{n} ( κ n ) n , we get ρ ∗ ∈ D Σ \rho^{*}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} ρ ∗ ∈ D Σ and that ( Σ ( ν n ) ) n (\Sigma(\nu_{n}))_{n} ( Σ ( ν n ) ) n converges weakly to Σ ( ρ ∗ ) \Sigma(\rho^{*}) Σ ( ρ ∗ ) along ( κ n ) n (\kappa_{n})_{n} ( κ n ) n ; likewise σ ∗ ∈ D Σ \sigma^{*}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} σ ∗ ∈ D Σ , with ( Σ ( ν n ′ ) ) n (\Sigma(\nu'_{n}))_{n} ( Σ ( ν n ′ ) ) n converging weakly to Σ ( σ ∗ ) \Sigma(\sigma^{*}) Σ ( σ ∗ ) along ( κ n ′ ) n (\kappa'_{n})_{n} ( κ n ′ ) n . So ( ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ) ∈ D Σ × D Σ (\rho^{*},\sigma^{*})\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\times\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} ( ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ) ∈ D Σ × D Σ , and ξ = ( ρ ∗ , s ∗ , V ∗ , X ) \xi=(\rho^{*},s_{*},V_{*},\mathbb{X}) ξ = ( ρ ∗ , s ∗ , V ∗ , X ) and η = ( σ ∗ , t ∗ , V ∗ ′ , Y ) \eta=(\sigma^{*},t_{*},V'_{*},\mathbb{Y}) η = ( σ ∗ , t ∗ , V ∗ ′ , Y ) are test data for F F F .
Step 5 (Shift-semicontinuity). Put R ′ ′ = R ′ + C R''=R'+C R ′′ = R ′ + C , positive. Every ξ n \xi_{n} ξ n is R ′ ′ R'' R ′′ -bounded and ∥ Σ ( ν n ) ∥ ν n ≤ R ′ ′ \lVert\Sigma(\nu_{n})\rVert_{\nu_{n}}\le R'' ∥ Σ ( ν n ) ∥ ν n ≤ R ′′ ; with Steps 2 and 4 this says that ( ξ n ) n (\xi_{n})_{n} ( ξ n ) n converges to ξ \xi ξ along ( κ n ) n (\kappa_{n})_{n} ( κ n ) n with score bounded by R ′ ′ R'' R ′′ , and likewise ( η n ) n (\eta_{n})_{n} ( η n ) n converges to η \eta η along ( κ n ′ ) n (\kappa'_{n})_{n} ( κ n ′ ) n with score bounded by R ′ ′ R'' R ′′ . F F F is shift-semicontinuous at ( δ , R ′ ′ ) (\delta,R'') ( δ , R ′′ ) (The Shift-Semicontinuity Condition for an Equation Operator on the Wasserstein Space §semicontinuity ). Given ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 there is N N N with ϵ n ≤ ε \epsilon_{n}\le\varepsilon ϵ n ≤ ε for n ≥ N n\ge N n ≥ N , so F δ − ( ξ n ) ≤ 0 + ε F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi_{n})\le0+\varepsilon F δ − ( ξ n ) ≤ 0 + ε and 0 − ε ≤ F δ + ( η n ) 0-\varepsilon\le F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{n}) 0 − ε ≤ F δ + ( η n ) for n ≥ N n\ge N n ≥ N ; the two implications of The Shift-Semicontinuity Condition for an Equation Operator on the Wasserstein Space §level with c = 0 c=0 c = 0 give F δ − ( ξ ) ≤ 0 ≤ F δ + ( η ) F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi)\le0\le F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta) F δ − ( ξ ) ≤ 0 ≤ F δ + ( η ) .
Step 6 (Properness and the structure condition). The measures ρ ∗ , σ ∗ \rho^{*},\sigma^{*} ρ ∗ , σ ∗ lie in D Σ ⊆ D \mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\subseteq\mathcal{D} D Σ ⊆ D , which has the map property, so both ordered pairs ( ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ) (\rho^{*},\sigma^{*}) ( ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ) and ( σ ∗ , ρ ∗ ) (\sigma^{*},\rho^{*}) ( σ ∗ , ρ ∗ ) are uniquely mapped (The Map Property of a Set of Probability Measures §map-property ); δ ( ∣ E ( ρ ∗ ) ∣ + ∣ E ( σ ∗ ) ∣ ) ≤ 2 B ≤ R \delta(|\mathcal{E}(\rho^{*})|+|\mathcal{E}(\sigma^{*})|)\le2B\le R δ ( ∣ E ( ρ ∗ ) ∣ + ∣ E ( σ ∗ ) ∣ ) ≤ 2 B ≤ R ; − R ≤ t ∗ ≤ R -R\le t_{*}\le R − R ≤ t ∗ ≤ R since ∣ t ∗ ∣ ≤ B ≤ R |t_{*}|\le B\le R ∣ t ∗ ∣ ≤ B ≤ R ; and ( X , Y ) (\mathbb{X},\mathbb{Y}) ( X , Y ) is admitted at α \alpha α . So The Second-Order Structure Condition at Uniquely Mapped Pairs on the Wasserstein Space §pair , for the pair ( ω 1 , ω 2 ) (\omega_{1},\omega_{2}) ( ω 1 , ω 2 ) at R R R with the value slot t ∗ t_{*} t ∗ , gives
− ω 1 ( α W ( ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ) 2 + α − 1 ) − ω 2 ( δ ( ∣ E ( ρ ∗ ) ∣ + ∣ E ( σ ∗ ) ∣ + 1 ) , α ) ≤ F δ − ( ρ ∗ , t ∗ , V ∗ , X ) − F δ + ( η ) . -\omega_{1}\bigl(\alpha W(\rho^{*},\sigma^{*})^{2}+\alpha^{-1}\bigr)-\omega_{2}\bigl(\delta(|\mathcal{E}(\rho^{*})|+|\mathcal{E}(\sigma^{*})|+1),\alpha\bigr)\le F^{-}_{\delta}(\rho^{*},t_{*},V_{*},\mathbb{X})-F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta). − ω 1 ( α W ( ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ) 2 + α − 1 ) − ω 2 ( δ ( ∣ E ( ρ ∗ ) ∣ + ∣ E ( σ ∗ ) ∣ + 1 ) , α ) ≤ F δ − ( ρ ∗ , t ∗ , V ∗ , X ) − F δ + ( η ) .
By The Bundle of Vector Fields over a Set of Measures, Second-Order Equation Operators on the Wasserstein Space, and Their Delta-Shifts §shifted , F δ − ( ρ ∗ , r , V ∗ , X ) = F ( ρ ∗ , r + δ E ( ρ ∗ ) , V ∗ + δ Σ ( ρ ∗ ) , X ) F^{-}_{\delta}(\rho^{*},r,V_{*},\mathbb{X})=F(\rho^{*},r+\delta\mathcal{E}(\rho^{*}),V_{*}+\delta\Sigma(\rho^{*}),\mathbb{X}) F δ − ( ρ ∗ , r , V ∗ , X ) = F ( ρ ∗ , r + δ E ( ρ ∗ ) , V ∗ + δ Σ ( ρ ∗ ) , X ) for every r ∈ R r\in\mathbb{R} r ∈ R . We have t ∗ + δ E ( ρ ∗ ) ≤ s ∗ + δ E ( ρ ∗ ) t_{*}+\delta\mathcal{E}(\rho^{*})\le s_{*}+\delta\mathcal{E}(\rho^{*}) t ∗ + δ E ( ρ ∗ ) ≤ s ∗ + δ E ( ρ ∗ ) , and both have absolute value at most B + B ≤ R B+B\le R B + B ≤ R (claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field ), so the properness constant λ \lambda λ at R R R (Locally Strictly Proper Second-Order Equation Operator on the Wasserstein Space §constant , with Q = D Σ Q=\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} Q = D Σ ) gives
λ ( s ∗ − t ∗ ) ≤ F δ − ( ξ ) − F δ − ( ρ ∗ , t ∗ , V ∗ , X ) . \lambda(s_{*}-t_{*})\le F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi)-F^{-}_{\delta}(\rho^{*},t_{*},V_{*},\mathbb{X}). λ ( s ∗ − t ∗ ) ≤ F δ − ( ξ ) − F δ − ( ρ ∗ , t ∗ , V ∗ , X ) .
Adding the two displays and using F δ − ( ξ ) − F δ + ( η ) ≤ 0 F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi)-F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta)\le0 F δ − ( ξ ) − F δ + ( η ) ≤ 0 from Step 5,
λ ( s ∗ − t ∗ ) ≤ ω 1 ( α W ( ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ) 2 + α − 1 ) + ω 2 ( δ ( ∣ E ( ρ ∗ ) ∣ + ∣ E ( σ ∗ ) ∣ + 1 ) , α ) . \lambda(s_{*}-t_{*})\le\omega_{1}\bigl(\alpha W(\rho^{*},\sigma^{*})^{2}+\alpha^{-1}\bigr)+\omega_{2}\bigl(\delta(|\mathcal{E}(\rho^{*})|+|\mathcal{E}(\sigma^{*})|+1),\alpha\bigr). λ ( s ∗ − t ∗ ) ≤ ω 1 ( α W ( ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ) 2 + α − 1 ) + ω 2 ( δ ( ∣ E ( ρ ∗ ) ∣ + ∣ E ( σ ∗ ) ∣ + 1 ) , α ) .
Finally M ≤ s ∗ − t ∗ M\le s_{*}-t_{*} M ≤ s ∗ − t ∗ and 0 < λ 0<\lambda 0 < λ give λ M ≤ λ ( s ∗ − t ∗ ) \lambda M\le\lambda(s_{*}-t_{*}) λ M ≤ λ ( s ∗ − t ∗ ) by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field . With Ψ ( ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ) = M \Psi(\rho^{*},\sigma^{*})=M Ψ ( ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ) = M and ( ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ) ∈ D Σ × D Σ (\rho^{*},\sigma^{*})\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\times\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} ( ρ ∗ , σ ∗ ) ∈ D Σ × D Σ , this is the claim.