TheoremBase

Each clause is reduced to the dot product, using the uniqueness of nonnegative square roots, bilinearity, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and comparison of finite sums of nonnegative terms.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Throughout, R\mathbb{R} is an ordered field, so the rules of arithmetic and order of Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field, carried by Commutative Rings, Fields and Ordered Fields: Standard Notation §ordered-fields, are used without further citation. For a∈Ra\in\mathbb{R} we have a2=a aa^{2}=a\,a, since 2=1+12=1+1 by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §digits, a1+1=a1a1a^{1+1}=a^{1}a^{1} by Powers in a Commutative Ring, a Field and an Ordered Field: Exponent Laws, Factorisation, Geometric Sums, Monotonicity and Bernoulli's Inequality §exponents and a1=aa^{1}=a by Powers in a Commutative Ring, a Field and an Ordered Field: Exponent Laws, Factorisation, Geometric Sums, Monotonicity and Bernoulli's Inequality §product; moreover 2=1+12=1+1 in R\mathbb{R} by Commutative Rings, Fields and Ordered Fields: Standard Notation §numerals and Closure Facts in an Ordered Field: Negatives, Differences, Quotients, Absolute Values, Powers, Natural Numbers, Halves and Minima §two, so b+b=2bb+b=2b for b∈Rb\in\mathbb{R}, and 2>02>0 since 0<1+10<1+1. Also ∣a∣2=∣a2∣=a2|a|^{2}=|a^{2}|=a^{2} for every a∈Ra\in\mathbb{R}, where ∣a∣∈R|a|\in\mathbb{R} by Closure Facts in an Ordered Field: Negatives, Differences, Quotients, Absolute Values, Powers, Natural Numbers, Halves and Minima §absolute-value: the first equality is Powers in a Commutative Ring, a Field and an Ordered Field: Exponent Laws, Factorisation, Geometric Sums, Monotonicity and Bernoulli's Inequality §sign, and the second holds by Absolute Value in an Ordered Field §absolute-value because a2=a a≥0a^{2}=a\,a\ge0.

For u,v∈Rnu,v\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}, the elements u+vu+v, u−vu-v, −u-u and tutu lie in Rn=R[n]\mathbb{R}^{n}=\mathbb{R}^{[n]} by Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n: n-Tuples of Real Numbers with Their Componentwise Operations §operations and Pointwise Operations on Real-Valued Maps §operations, and their components are given by Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n: n-Tuples of Real Numbers with Their Componentwise Operations §operations. Two elements of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with the same components are equal by Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n: n-Tuples of Real Numbers with Their Componentwise Operations §equality; the origin 00 has every component 00 by Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n: n-Tuples of Real Numbers with Their Componentwise Operations §origin and Pointwise Operations on Real-Valued Maps §constants. In particular, comparing components, for u,v∈Rnu,v\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:

u−0=u,u−(u+v)=−v,(u−v)+v=u,v−u=−(u−v),−u=(−1)u,u-0=u,\qquad u-(u+v)=-v,\qquad (u-v)+v=u,\qquad v-u=-(u-v),\qquad -u=(-1)u,

since, for each k∈[n]k\in[n], uk−0=uku_{k}-0=u_{k}, uk−(uk+vk)=−vku_{k}-(u_{k}+v_{k})=-v_{k}, (uk−vk)+vk=uk(u_{k}-v_{k})+v_{k}=u_{k}, vk−uk=−(uk−vk)v_{k}-u_{k}=-(u_{k}-v_{k}) and (−1)uk=−uk(-1)u_{k}=-u_{k}.

Clause square. By The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite §nonnegative, x⋅x=∑k=1nxk2≥0x\cdot x=\sum_{k=1}^{n}x_{k}^{2}\ge0. By The Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §norm, The k-th Root and the Square Root of a Nonnegative Real Number §square-root and The k-th Root and the Square Root of a Nonnegative Real Number §root, ∥x∥=x⋅x\lVert x\rVert=\sqrt{x\cdot x} is the real number y≥0y\ge0 with y2=x⋅xy^{2}=x\cdot x, and by Existence and Uniqueness of Nonnegative k-th Roots of Nonnegative Real Numbers §root there is exactly one such yy. Hence ∥x∥≥0\lVert x\rVert\ge0, ∥x∥2=x⋅x=∑k=1nxk2\lVert x\rVert^{2}=x\cdot x=\sum_{k=1}^{n}x_{k}^{2}, and ∥x∥\lVert x\rVert is the only nonnegative real number whose square is x⋅xx\cdot x. We refer to the last statement as uniqueness: for u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R}, if r≥0r\ge0 and r2=u⋅ur^{2}=u\cdot u, then r=∥u∥r=\lVert u\rVert.

Clause vanishing. If ∥x∥=0\lVert x\rVert=0, then x⋅x=∥x∥2=02=0x\cdot x=\lVert x\rVert^{2}=0^{2}=0, by the clause square and Powers in a Commutative Ring, a Field and an Ordered Field: Exponent Laws, Factorisation, Geometric Sums, Monotonicity and Bernoulli's Inequality §product. Conversely, if x⋅x=0x\cdot x=0, then 0≥00\ge0 and 02=0=x⋅x0^{2}=0=x\cdot x, so ∥x∥=0\lVert x\rVert=0 by uniqueness. Thus ∥x∥=0\lVert x\rVert=0 if and only if x⋅x=0x\cdot x=0, which holds if and only if x=0x=0 by The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite §definite.

Clause homogeneity. By The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite §first (with z=txz=tx) and The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite §second (with z=xz=x),

(tx)⋅(tx)=t (x⋅(tx))=t (t (x⋅x))=t2 (x⋅x).(tx)\cdot(tx)=t\,\bigl(x\cdot(tx)\bigr)=t\,\bigl(t\,(x\cdot x)\bigr)=t^{2}\,(x\cdot x).

Let r=∣t∣ ∥x∥r=|t|\,\lVert x\rVert; then r≥0r\ge0 as a product of nonnegative reals (∣t∣∈R|t|\in\mathbb{R} by Closure Facts in an Ordered Field: Negatives, Differences, Quotients, Absolute Values, Powers, Natural Numbers, Halves and Minima §absolute-value and ∣t∣≥0|t|\ge0, and ∥x∥≥0\lVert x\rVert\ge0 by the clause square). By Powers in a Commutative Ring, a Field and an Ordered Field: Exponent Laws, Factorisation, Geometric Sums, Monotonicity and Bernoulli's Inequality §product and the preliminary remarks, r2=∣t∣2 ∥x∥2=t2 (x⋅x)=(tx)⋅(tx)r^{2}=|t|^{2}\,\lVert x\rVert^{2}=t^{2}\,(x\cdot x)=(tx)\cdot(tx). By uniqueness applied to u=txu=tx, ∥tx∥=r=∣t∣ ∥x∥\lVert tx\rVert=r=|t|\,\lVert x\rVert. Since −x=(−1)x-x=(-1)x and ∣−1∣=∣1∣=1|-1|=|1|=1, with −1∈R-1\in\mathbb{R} by Closure Facts in an Ordered Field: Negatives, Differences, Quotients, Absolute Values, Powers, Natural Numbers, Halves and Minima §negative, this gives ∥−x∥=∥x∥\lVert -x\rVert=\lVert x\rVert.

Clause distance. By The Euclidean Distance on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §distance, dE(x,y)=∥x−y∥d_{E}(x,y)=\lVert x-y\rVert. By the clause square applied to x−yx-y, and since (x−y)k=xk−yk(x-y)_{k}=x_{k}-y_{k} for every k∈[n]k\in[n],

dE(x,y)2=∥x−y∥2=∑k=1n(x−y)k2=∑k=1n(xk−yk)2.d_{E}(x,y)^{2}=\lVert x-y\rVert^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}(x-y)_{k}^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}(x_{k}-y_{k})^{2}.

Further dE(x,0)=∥x−0∥=∥x∥d_{E}(x,0)=\lVert x-0\rVert=\lVert x\rVert, and dE(x,x+y)=∥x−(x+y)∥=∥−y∥=∥y∥d_{E}(x,x+y)=\lVert x-(x+y)\rVert=\lVert -y\rVert=\lVert y\rVert by the clause homogeneity.

Clause expansion. By the clause square applied to x+yx+y, then The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite §first (with z=x+yz=x+y), The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite §second (with z=xz=x and with z=yz=y) and The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite §symmetric,

∥x+y∥2=(x+y)⋅(x+y)=x⋅(x+y)+y⋅(x+y)=x⋅x+x⋅y+y⋅x+y⋅y=∥x∥2+2 (x⋅y)+∥y∥2,\lVert x+y\rVert^{2}=(x+y)\cdot(x+y)=x\cdot(x+y)+y\cdot(x+y)=x\cdot x+x\cdot y+y\cdot x+y\cdot y=\lVert x\rVert^{2}+2\,(x\cdot y)+\lVert y\rVert^{2},

using x⋅y+y⋅x=x⋅y+x⋅y=2 (x⋅y)x\cdot y+y\cdot x=x\cdot y+x\cdot y=2\,(x\cdot y) and the clause square for xx and yy. If x⋅y=0x\cdot y=0, then 2 (x⋅y)=02\,(x\cdot y)=0 and ∥x+y∥2=∥x∥2+∥y∥2\lVert x+y\rVert^{2}=\lVert x\rVert^{2}+\lVert y\rVert^{2}.

Clause triangle. By Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §absolute-value and The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §cauchy-schwarz, x⋅y≤∣x⋅y∣≤∥x∥ ∥y∥x\cdot y\le|x\cdot y|\le\lVert x\rVert\,\lVert y\rVert, and as 2>02>0, 2 (x⋅y)≤2 ∥x∥ ∥y∥2\,(x\cdot y)\le2\,\lVert x\rVert\,\lVert y\rVert. Hence, by the clause expansion and The Square and the Fourth Power of a Sum §square (in the commutative ring R\mathbb{R}),

∥x+y∥2=∥x∥2+2 (x⋅y)+∥y∥2≤∥x∥2+2 ∥x∥ ∥y∥+∥y∥2=(∥x∥+∥y∥)2.\lVert x+y\rVert^{2}=\lVert x\rVert^{2}+2\,(x\cdot y)+\lVert y\rVert^{2}\le\lVert x\rVert^{2}+2\,\lVert x\rVert\,\lVert y\rVert+\lVert y\rVert^{2}=\bigl(\lVert x\rVert+\lVert y\rVert\bigr)^{2}.

Both ∥x+y∥\lVert x+y\rVert and ∥x∥+∥y∥\lVert x\rVert+\lVert y\rVert are nonnegative by the clause square, so Powers in a Commutative Ring, a Field and an Ordered Field: Exponent Laws, Factorisation, Geometric Sums, Monotonicity and Bernoulli's Inequality §monotone-iff (with exponent 2≥12\ge1) gives ∥x+y∥≤∥x∥+∥y∥\lVert x+y\rVert\le\lVert x\rVert+\lVert y\rVert.

Clause reverse-triangle. Since x=(x−y)+yx=(x-y)+y, the clause triangle gives ∥x∥≤∥x−y∥+∥y∥\lVert x\rVert\le\lVert x-y\rVert+\lVert y\rVert, that is ∥x∥−∥y∥≤∥x−y∥\lVert x\rVert-\lVert y\rVert\le\lVert x-y\rVert. Likewise y=(y−x)+xy=(y-x)+x gives ∥y∥−∥x∥≤∥y−x∥\lVert y\rVert-\lVert x\rVert\le\lVert y-x\rVert, and ∥y−x∥=∥−(x−y)∥=∥x−y∥\lVert y-x\rVert=\lVert-(x-y)\rVert=\lVert x-y\rVert by the clause homogeneity. So −∥x−y∥≤∥x∥−∥y∥≤∥x−y∥-\lVert x-y\rVert\le\lVert x\rVert-\lVert y\rVert\le\lVert x-y\rVert, and Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §absolute-value gives ∣∥x∥−∥y∥∣≤∥x−y∥\bigl|\lVert x\rVert-\lVert y\rVert\bigr|\le\lVert x-y\rVert.

Clause coordinate. Let k∈[n]k\in[n]. By the preliminary remarks, The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite §coordinate-square and the clause square, ∣xk∣2=xk2≤x⋅x=∥x∥2|x_{k}|^{2}=x_{k}^{2}\le x\cdot x=\lVert x\rVert^{2}; as ∣xk∣≥0|x_{k}|\ge0 and ∥x∥≥0\lVert x\rVert\ge0, Powers in a Commutative Ring, a Field and an Ordered Field: Exponent Laws, Factorisation, Geometric Sums, Monotonicity and Bernoulli's Inequality §monotone-iff (exponent 22) gives ∣xk∣≤∥x∥|x_{k}|\le\lVert x\rVert.

For the second inequality let S=∑j=1n∣xj∣S=\sum_{j=1}^{n}|x_{j}|. The maps j↦∣xj∣j\mapsto|x_{j}|, j↦S ∣xj∣j\mapsto S\,|x_{j}| and j↦∣xj∣ ∣xj∣j\mapsto|x_{j}|\,|x_{j}| to which the finite-sum lemmas are applied below, and the constant map j↦sj\mapsto s of the last paragraph, are maps from [n][n] to R\mathbb{R} by Sets and Maps: Ordinary Notation §maps, their values lying in R\mathbb{R} by Closure Facts in an Ordered Field: Negatives, Differences, Quotients, Absolute Values, Powers, Natural Numbers, Halves and Minima §absolute-value (for S ∣xj∣S\,|x_{j}| with S∈RS\in\mathbb{R}, which holds by Iterated Operations and Operations over Finite Sets Take Values in the Underlying Set §segment-sums applied to j↦∣xj∣j\mapsto|x_{j}|) and their defining conditions being predicative by Predicative Substitution of Values of Functions and Binary Operations, and Predicative Formulas for Negatives, Differences, Absolute Values, Distances, Reciprocals and Quotients in an Ordered Field §value-substitution, Predicative Substitution of Values of Functions and Binary Operations, and Predicative Formulas for Negatives, Differences, Absolute Values, Distances, Reciprocals and Quotients in an Ordered Field §operation-substitution and Predicative Substitution of Values of Functions and Binary Operations, and Predicative Formulas for Negatives, Differences, Absolute Values, Distances, Reciprocals and Quotients in an Ordered Field §absolute-value-formula. Since ∣xj∣≥0|x_{j}|\ge0 for every j∈[n]j\in[n], Finite Sums in a Commutative Ring and in an Ordered Field: Distributivity, Differences, Telescoping, Constant Terms, Comparison and the Triangle Inequality §nonnegative gives S≥0S\ge0 and ∣xj∣≤S|x_{j}|\le S for every j∈[n]j\in[n]. For each j∈[n]j\in[n] we have ∣xj∣ ∣xj∣≤S ∣xj∣|x_{j}|\,|x_{j}|\le S\,|x_{j}|: if ∣xj∣=0|x_{j}|=0 both sides are 00, and otherwise ∣xj∣>0|x_{j}|>0 and this follows from ∣xj∣≤S|x_{j}|\le S by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-product. Hence, by Finite Sums in a Commutative Ring and in an Ordered Field: Distributivity, Differences, Telescoping, Constant Terms, Comparison and the Triangle Inequality §distributive (with c=Sc=S), Finite Sums in a Commutative Ring and in an Ordered Field: Distributivity, Differences, Telescoping, Constant Terms, Comparison and the Triangle Inequality §comparison, the preliminary remarks and the clause square,

S2=S∑j=1n∣xj∣=∑j=1nS ∣xj∣≥∑j=1n∣xj∣ ∣xj∣=∑j=1nxj2=∥x∥2,S^{2}=S\sum_{j=1}^{n}|x_{j}|=\sum_{j=1}^{n}S\,|x_{j}|\ge\sum_{j=1}^{n}|x_{j}|\,|x_{j}|=\sum_{j=1}^{n}x_{j}^{2}=\lVert x\rVert^{2},

the equality ∣xj∣ ∣xj∣=∣xj∣2=xj2|x_{j}|\,|x_{j}|=|x_{j}|^{2}=x_{j}^{2} holding termwise. As S≥0S\ge0 and ∥x∥≥0\lVert x\rVert\ge0, Powers in a Commutative Ring, a Field and an Ordered Field: Exponent Laws, Factorisation, Geometric Sums, Monotonicity and Bernoulli's Inequality §monotone-iff (exponent 22) gives ∥x∥≤S\lVert x\rVert\le S.

Finally let s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R} with ∣xk∣≤s|x_{k}|\le s for every k∈[n]k\in[n]. By Finite Sums in a Commutative Ring and in an Ordered Field: Distributivity, Differences, Telescoping, Constant Terms, Comparison and the Triangle Inequality §comparison and Finite Sums in a Commutative Ring and in an Ordered Field: Distributivity, Differences, Telescoping, Constant Terms, Comparison and the Triangle Inequality §constant, ∑j=1n∣xj∣≤∑j=1ns=n s\sum_{j=1}^{n}|x_{j}|\le\sum_{j=1}^{n}s=n\,s, so ∥x∥≤n s\lVert x\rVert\le n\,s by the bound just proved.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…